Skip to main content

Full text of "Newtonian Mechanics"

See other formats

Newtonian mechanics 

A. R French 



o o o o o senes 







I his tcxl prescnts the import 

m bot h cUlMlol and modern 
physics as relevani today, atartlng 
fiom ibout 

niotion and ending with an 

problcms in murinml dynamics. 
i lu- prime empha i the 

lopment and usc of New. i 

ii a cornpletc 
llret-yaar tnechanka couim and 
contains manj iiiggesdona i<>r 
further rcadh 

Aboul tbC Aulhor 

\ i eived bot h his B. A. 

Ph. D. degrees from ( amhridge 
i nivenlty, where he cootinued asa 
member of the Physics i tepartment 
from 1948 undi 1955. b 

■ic joincd the staff of the 
l m. : South 

PhyalGS and became 


hc wenl to mi i 

Profc I was appointed 

t wo years later. 

has devoted ai 
half his timc during the past ala 
lopment of the 
\t i i . Introdw 
but his eapertaaca h bj do dm 
purel . He hai had 

extc carch assignments with 

the Cavendlah i aboratoriea, the 
Manhattan Project, and the U.K. 
Vtomk Eoergj Reseercb 




AH liooks must be Returned to «he College Library or 
Renewed not later iban the last date sbown below. 





NGV !974 

-6. OCT. 19J 



FEB. 197L. 

-?■ M 197 

. 19. m. [991 

-3. MAY 1976 



-0 ■ 
7. I 

21. FED. 1997 



The M.I.T. 

Special RelatiVity 


Vibrations and Waves 


Newtonian Mechanics 




A. E French _ 




36 Park Street London wIy 4de 
po Box 18123 Nairobi Kenya 


597 Little Collins Street Melbourne 3000 


8 1 Curlew Drive Don Mills Ontario 


po Box 336 Apapa Lagos 


51 Commissioner Street Johanncsburg 

Copyright © 1971, 1965 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 
First published in Great Britain 1971 

sbn 17 771074 8 (paper) 
L^bn 17 761075 1 (boards) 


per ■ ic' 


— — » 



Made and printed by 

William Clowes & Sons Ltd, Beccles, Colchester and London 


Preface xi 
Prologue 3 


1 A universe of particles 21 

The particulate view 21 

Eleclrons and nucleons 24 

Atomic nuclei 25 

Atoms 26 

Molecules; licing cells 28 

Sand and dust 31 

Other lerrestrial objecls 32 

Planels and satellifes 33 

Stars 35 

Galaxies 36 


2 Space, time, and motion 43 

What is motion? 43 
Frames ofreference 46 
Coordinale systems 48 

Combination ofvector displacements 53 

The resolution ofvectors 56 

Vector addilion and the properties ofspace 59 

Time 61 

Uni is and standards oflength and time 63 

Space-time graphs 66 

Velocily 67 

lnslantaneous velocily 68 

Relatlve velocily and relative motion 72 

Planetary motions: Ptolemy versus Copernicus 74 


3 Accelerated motions 85 

Acceleralion 85 

The analysis of straight-line motion 87 

A comment on exlraneous roots 93 

Trujectory problems in two dimensions 95 

Free fail of individual aloms 98 

Other features of motion in free fail 102 

Uniform circular motion 105 

Velocily and acceleralion in polar coordinales 106 


4 Forces and equilibrium 115 

Forces in static equilibrium 116 
Unit s offorce 118 

Ekuilibrium conditions; forces as vector s 119 
Action and reaction in the contact of objects 123 
Rotational ekuilibrium; loraue 124 
Forces without contact; weight 128 
Pulleys and slrings 130 
problems 132 

5 The various forces of nature 139 

The hasic lypes of forces 139 
Gravitatkmal forces 140 
Electric and magnetic forces 145 
Nuclear forces 147 
Forces between neutral atoms 148 
Con laci forces 1 50 
Frictional contact forces 152 
Concluding remarks 154 
problems 154 


6 Force, inertia, and motion 161 

The principle of inertia 161 
Force and inertial mass: Newlon's law 164 
Some comments on Newlon's law 167 
Scales ofmass and force 170 
The effect of a continuing force 173 
The incariance of Newton' s law; relatioily 173 
Incar iance with specific force laws 176 
Newlon's law and time reuersal 178 
Concluding remarks 180 
problems 181 


7 Using Newton's law 187 

Some inlroduclory examples 188 
Motion in two dimensions 194 
Mo I ion in a circle 198 
Curoilinear motion with changing speed 200 
Circular pai lis of charged particles in uniform magnelic fields 202 
Charged particle in a magnelic fielcl 205 
Mass spectrographs 206 
The fracture ofrapidly rotating objects 208 
Motion against resistive forces 210 
Deiailed analysis ofresisted motion 213 
Motion gocerned by viscosily 218 
Growlh and decay ofresisted motion 221 
Air resistance and "independence of molions" 225 
Simple harmonic motion 226 
More about simple harmonic motion 231 
problems 234 

8 Universal gravitation 245 

The discovery of universal gravitation 245 

The orbit s of the planet s 246 

Planetary periods 249 

Kepler's third law 252 

The moon and the apple 256 

Finding the dislance to the moon 259 

The gracitational attraciion of a large sphere 261 

Other satellites of the eartli 265 

The ualue of G, and the mass of the earth 268 

Local uariations of g 270 

The mass of the sun 274 


Finding the dislance to the sun 275 
Mass and weight 279 
Weightlessness 285 
Learning about other planets 286 
The moons ofJupiter 288 
The discovery ofNeptune 291 
Gravilation outside the solar system 295 
Einstein's theory of gravilation 299 


9 Collisions and conservation laws 307 

The laws of impact 308 

The conservation of linear momentum 309 

Momentum as a vector guantity 310 

Action, reaction, and impulse 313 

Extending the principie of momentum conservation 318 

The force exerted hy a stream ofparticles 321 

Reaction from a fluid jet 324 

Rocket propulsion 327 

Collisions and f rames ofreference 331 

Kinetic energy in collisions 333 

The zero-momentum frame 335 

Collision processes in two dimensions 339 

Elastic nuclear collisions 342 

Inelastic and explosive processes 346 

What is a collisionl 351 

lnteracting particles subject t o external forces 352 

The pressure of a gas 354 

The neutrino 356 


10 Energy conservation in dynamics; 

vibrational motions 367 

Introduction 367 

lntegrals of motion 368 

Work, energy, and power 373 

Gravitational potential energy 376 

More about one-dimensional situations 379 

The energy methodfor one-dimensional motions 381 

Some examples of the energy method 384 

The harmonic oscillator by the energy method 393 

Small oscillations in general 395 

The linear oscillator as a two-body problem 397 

Collision processes inuolving energy storage 400 

The diatomic molecule 405 



1 1 Conservative forces and motion in space 423 

Extending the concepl of conservative forces 423 

Acceleration of two connected masses 425 

Object moving in a verlical circle 426 

An experimenl by Galileo 429 

Mass on a puraboiic track 431 

The simple pendulum 434 

The pendulum cis a harmonic oscillator 437 

The pendulum with larger amplitudo 440 

Universal gravitation: a conservative central force 442 

A gravitating spherical shell 446 

A gravitating sphere 450 

Escape velocities 453 

More aboul the cri teria for conservative forces 457 

Fields 461 

Equipotential surfaces and the gradien! of potential energy 463 

Motion in conservative fields 466 

The effect of dissipative forces 470 

Gauss's law 473 

Applications of Gauss's theorem 476 



12 Inertial forces and non-inertial frames 493 

Motion observed from unaccelerated frames 494 
Motion observed front an accelerated frame 495 
Accelerated frames and inertial forces 497 
Accelerometers 501 
Accelerating frames and gravity 504 
Centrif ugal force 507 
Centrifuges 511 
Coriolis forces 514 
Dynamics on a merry-go-round 518 
General ecjuation of motion in a rotating frame 519 
The earth as a rotating reference frame 524 
The tides 531 

Tidal heights; effect of the sun 535 
The search for a fundamental inertial frame 538 
Speculations on the origin of inertia 542 

13 Motion under central forces 555 

Basic features of the problem 555 

The law ofequal areas 557 

The conservation of angular momentum 560 


Energy conseruation in ceniral force molions 563 

Vse of the effectiue potential-energy citrues 565 

Bounded orbtts 568 

Unbcnmded orbits 569 

Circular orbtts in an inuerse-square force field 572 

Small perturbation of a circular orbit 574 

The elliptic orbits ofthe planels 577 

Deducing the inuerse-scpiare law from the eltipse 583 

Elliptic orbits: analylical treatment 585 

Energy in an elliptic orbit 589 

Molion near the earth's surface 591 

Interplcmetciry transfer orbits 592 

Calculaling an orbit from inilial condilions 595 

A family of relai ed orbits 596 

Central force motion as a two-body problem 598 

Deducing the orbit from the force law 600 

Rutherford scattering 604 

Cross sections for scattering 609 

Alpha-particle scattering (Geiger and Marsden, Philosophical 

Magazine excerpts) 612 
An historical note 615 

problems 617 

14 Extended systems and rotational dynamics 627 

Momentum and kinetic energy of a many-particle system 628 
Angtilar momentum 632 

Angular momentum as a fundamental quanlity 636 
Conseruation of angular momentum 639 
Moments of inertia of extended objects 643 
Two theorems concerning moments of inertia 647 
Kinetic energy ofrotaling objects 651 
Angular momentum conseruation and kinetic energy 654 
Torsional oscillations and rigid pendulums 659 
Motion under combined forces and tonjues 664 
Impu/sioe forces and torgues 668 
Bachground to gyroscopic motion 671 
Gyroscope in steady precession 677 
More about precessional motion 680 
Gyroscopes in nauigation 683 
Atoms and nuclei as gyroscopes 686 
Gyroscopic motion in teriris of F = »ia 688 
Niitation 691 

The precession of the equinoxes 694 
problems 700 

Appendix 709 
Bibliography 713 
Answers to problems 723 
lndex 733 


the work of the Education Research Center at M.I.T. (formerly 
the Science Teaching Center) is concerned with curriculum im- 
provement, with the process of instruction and aids thereto, and 
with the learning process itself, primarily with respect to students 
at the college or university undergraduate level. The Center was 
established by M.I.T. in 1960, with the late Professor Francis L. 
Friedman as its Director. Since 1961 the Center has been sup- 
ported mainly by the National Science Foundation; generous 
support has also been received from the Kettering Foundation, 
the Shell Companies Foundation, the Victoria Foundation, the 
W. T. Grant Foundation, and the Bing Foundation. 

The M.I.T. Introductory Physics Series, a direct outgrowth 
of the Center's work, is designed to be a set of short books that, 
taken collectively, span the main areas of basic physics. The 
series seeks to emphasize the interaction of experiment and intui- 
tion in generating physical theories. The books in the series are 
intended to provide a variety of possible bases for introductory 
courses, ranging from those which chiefly emphasize classical 
physics to those which embody a considerable amount of atomic 
and quantum physics. The various volumes are intended to be 
compatible in level and style of treatment but are not conceived 
as a tightly knit package; on the contrary, each book is designed 
to be reasonably self-contained and usable as an individual com- 
ponent in many different course structures. 


The text material in the present volume is designed to be a 
more or less self-contained introduction to Newtonian mechanics, 
such that a student with little or no grounding in the subject can, 
by beginning at the beginning, be brought gradually to a level of 
considerable proficicncy. A rough guide to the possible use of 
the book is suggested by its division into three parts. Part I, The 
Approach to Newtonian Dynamics, is intended to serve two pur- 
poses. First, it does discuss the basic concepts of kinematics and 
dynamics, more or less from scratch. Second, it seeks to place the 
study of mechanics squarely in the context of the world of physical 
phenomena and of neccssarily imperfect physical theories. This 
is a conscious reaction, on the author's part, against the preserta- 
tion of mechanics as "applied mathematics," with the divorce- 
ment from reality and the misleading impression of rigor that this 
has engendered in generations of students (especially, alas, those 
brought up in the British educational system). The student who 
already has some expertise in using Newton's laws will find little 
of an analytical or quantitative sort to learn from Part I, but he 
may still derive some value and interest from reading through it 
for its broader implications. 

Part II, Classical Mechanics at Work, is undoubtedly the 
heart of the book. Some instructors will wish to begin here, and 
relegate Part I to the status of background reading. The initial 
emphasis is on Newton's second law applied to individual objccts. 
Later, the emphasis shifts to systems of two or more particlcs, and 
to the conservation laws for momentum and energy. A fairly 
lengthy chapter is devoted to the subject that deserves pride of 
place in the whole Newtonian scheme— the theory of universal 
gravitation and its successes, which can still be appreciated as a 
pinnacle in man's attempts to discover order in the vast universe 
in which he finds himself. 

Part III, Some Special Topics, concerns itself with the prob- 
lems of noninertial frames, central-force motions, and rotational 
dynamics. Most of this material, except perhaps the fundamental 
features of rotational motion and angular momentum, could be 
regarded as optional if this book is used as the basis of a genuinely 
introduetory presentation of mechanics. Undoubtedly the book 
as a whole contains more material than could in its entirety be 
covered in a one-term course; one could, however, consider using 
Parts I and II as a manageablc paekage for beginners, and Parts II 
and III as a text for students having some prior preparation. 


One of the great satisfactions of classical mechanics lies in 
the vast range and variety of physical systems to which its princi- 
ples can be applied. The attempt has been made in this book to 
make explicit reference to such applications and, as in other books 
in this series, to "document" the presentation with appropriate 
citations from original sources. Enriched in this way by its own 
history, classical mechanics has an excitement that is not, in this 
author's view, surpassed by any of the more recent fields of 
physical thory. 

This book, like the others in the series, owes much to the 
thoughts, criticisms, and suggestions of many people, both 
students and instructors. A special acknowledgment in connection 
with the present volume is due to Prof. A. M. Hudson, of Occiden- 
tal College, Los Angeles, who worked with the present author in 
the preparation of the preliminary text from which, five years 
later, this final version evolved. Grateful thanks are also due to 
Eva M. Hakala and William H. Ingham for their invaluable help 
in preparing the manuscript for publication. 

Cambridge, Massachusetts 
July 1970 



In the Beginning was Mechanics. 

max von laue, History ofPhysics (1950) 

/ offer this work as the mathematical principles of philosophy, 
for the whole burden of philosophy seems to consist in this — 
from the phenomena ofmotions to investigate theforces of 
nature, and thenfrom these forces to demonstrate the other 

newton, Preface to the Principia (1686) 


one of the most prominent features of the universe is motion. 
Galaxies have motions with respect to other galaxies, all stars 
have motions, the planets have distinctive motions against the 
background of the stars, the events that capture our attention 
most quickly in everyday life are those involving motion, and 
even the apparently inert book that you are now reading is made 
up of atoms in rapid motion about their equilibrium positions. 
"Give me matter and motion," said the seventeenth-century 
French philosopher Rene Descartes, "and I will construct the 
universe." There can be no doubt that motion is a phenomenon 
we must learn to deal with at all levels if we are to understand 
the world around us. . 

Isaac Newton developed a precise and powerful theory j 
regarding motion, according to which the changes of_motion of 
any object are the result of J orces acting on itfln so doing he 
created the subject with "wmcrTthis book is coBeerned and which 
is called classical or Newtonian mechanics. I It was a landmark in 
the history of science, because it replacea a merely descriptive 
account of phenomena with a rational and marvelously successful 
scheme of cause and effect. Indeed, the strict causal nature of 
Newtonian mechanics had an impressive influence in the develop- 
ment of Western thought and civilization generally, provoking 
fundamental questions about the interrelationships of science, 
philosophy, and religion, with repercussions in social ideas and 
other areas of human endeavor. 

Classical mechanics is a subject with a fascinating dual 
character. For it starts out from the kinds of everyday experiences 

that are as old as mankind, yet it brings us face to face with some 
of the most profound questions about the universe in which we 
find ourselves. Is it not remarkable that the fiight of a thrown 
pebble, or the fail of an apple, should contain the clue to the 
mechanics of the heavens and should ultimately involve some of 
the most basic questions that we are able to formulate about the 
nature of space and time? Sometimes mechanics is presented as 
though it consisted merely of the routine application of self- 
evident or revealed truths. Nothing could be further from the 
case; it is a superb example of a physical theory, slowly evolved 
and refined through the continuing interplay between observation 
and hypothesis. 

The richness of our first-hand acquaintance with mechanics 
is impressive, and through the partnership of mind and eye and 
hand we solve, by direct action, innumerable dynamical problems 
without benefit of mathematical analysis. Like Moliere's famous 
character, M. Jourdain, who learned that he had been speaking 
prose all his life without realizing it, every human being is an 
expert in the consequences of the laws of mechanics, whether or 
not he has ever seen these laws written down. The skilled sports- 
man or athlete has an almost incredible degree of judgment and 
control of the amount and direction of muscular effort needed to 
achieve a desired result. It has been estimated, for example, that 
the World Series baseball championship would have changed 
hands in 1962 if one crucial swing at the ball had been a mere 
millimeter lower. ' But experiencing and controlling the motions 
of objects in this very personal sense is a far cry from analyzing 
them in terms of physical laws and equations. It is the task of 
classical mechanics to discover and formulate the essential 
principles, so that they can be applied to any situation, par- 
ticularly to inanimate objects interacting with one another. Our 
intimate familiarity with our own muscular actions and their 
consequences, although it represents a kind of understanding 
(and an important kind, too), does not help us much here. 

The greatest triumph of classical mechanics was Newton's 
own success in analyzing the workings of the solar system — a 
feat immortalized in the famous couplet of his contemporary and 
admirer, the poet Alexander Pope : 

■P. Kirkpatrick, Am. J. Phys., 31, 606 (1963). 

4 Prologue 

Nature and Nature's Laws Iay hid in night 
God said "Let Newton be," and all was light. 1 

Men had observed the motions of the heavenly bodies since time 
immemorial. They had noticed various regularities and had 
learned to predict such things as conjunctions of the planets and 
eclipses of the sun and moon. Then, in the sixteenth century, the 
Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe amassed meticulous records, of 
unprecedented accuracy, of the planetary motions. His assistant, 
Johannes Kepler, after wrestling with this enormous body of in- 
formation for years, found that all the observations could be 
summarized as follows: 

1 . The planets move in ellipses having the sun at one focus. 

2. The line joining the sun to a given planet sweeps out 
equal areas in equal times. 

3. The square of a planet's year, divided by the cube of its 
mean distance from the sun, is the same for all planets. 

This represented a magnificent advance in man's knowledge 
of the mechanics of the heavens, but it was still a description 
rather than a theory. Why? was the question that still looked for 
an answer. Then came Newton, with his concept of force as the 
cause of changes of motion, and with his postulate of a particular 
law of force — the inverse-square law of gravitation. Using these 
he demonstrated how Kepler's laws were just one consequence 
of a scheme of things that also included the falling apple and other 
terrestrial motions. (Later in this book we shall go into the de- 
tails of this great achievement of Newton's.) 

I f universal gravitation had done no more than to relate 
planetary periods and distances, it would still have been a splen- 
did theory. But, like any other good theory in physics, it had 
predictive value; that is, it could be applied to situations besides 
the ones from which it was deduced. Investigating the predic- 
tions of a theory may involve looking for hitherto unsuspected 
phenomena, or it may involve recognizing that an already 
familiar phenomenon must fit into the new framework. In either 
case the theory is subjected to searching tests, by which it must 

'To which there is the almost equally famous, although facetious, riposte: 
It did not last; the Devil, howling "Ho, 
Let Einstein be!" restored the status quo. 

(Sir John Squire) 

5 Prologue 

stand or fail. With Newton's theory of gravitation, the initial 
tests resided almost entirely in the analysis of known effects— 
but what a list! Here are some of the phenomena for which 
Newton proceeded to give quantitative explanations: 

1. The bulging of the earth and Jupiter because of their 

2. The variation of the acceleration of gravity with latitude 
over the earth's surface. 

3. The generation of the tides by the combined action of 
sun and moon. 

4. The paths of the comets through the solar system. 

5. The slow steady change in direction of the earth's axis 
of rotation produced by gravitational torques from the sun and 
moon. (A complete cycle of this variation takes about 25,000 
years, and the so-called "precession of the equinoxes" is a mani- 
festation of it.) 

This marvelous illumination of the workings of nature 
represented the last part of Newton's program, as he described 
it in our opening quotation ". . . and then from these forces to 
demonstrate the other phenomena." This modest phrase con- 
ceals not only the immensity of the achievement but also the 
magnitude of the role played by mathematics in this develop- 
ment. Newton had, in the theory of universal gravitation, 
created what would be called today a mathematical model of the 
solar system. And having once made the model, he followed out 
a host of its other implications. The working out was purely 
mathematical, but the final step— the test of the conclusions— 
involved a return to the world of physical experience, in the 
detailed checking of his predictions against the quantitative data 
of astronomy. 

Although Newton's mechanical picture of the universe was 
amply confirmed in his own time, he did not live to see some 
of its greatest triumphs. Perhaps the most impressive of these 
was the use of his laws to identify previously unrecognized mem- 
bers of the solar system. By a painstaking and lengthy analysis 
of the motions of the known planets, it was inferred that dis- 
turbing influences due to other planets must be at work. Thus it 
was that Neptune was discovered in 1846, and Pluto in 1930. 
In each case it was a matter of deducing where a telescope should 
be pointed to reveal a new planet, identifiable through its chang- 
ing position with respect to the general background of the stars. 

6 Prologuc 

What more striking and convincing evidence could there be that 
the theory works? 

Probably everyone who reads this book has some prior 
acquaintance with classical mechanics and with its expression in 
mathematically precise statements. And this may make it hard 
to realize that, as with any other physical theory, its development 
was not just a matter of mathematical logic applied undis- 
criminatingly to a mass of data. Was Newton inexorably driven 
to the inverse-square Iaw? By no means. It was the result of 
guesswork, intuition, and imagination. In Newton's own words: 
"I began to think of gravity extending to the orbit of the Moon, 
and . . . fromKepler's Ruleof the periodictimesofthePlanets . . . 
I deduced that the forces which keep the Planets in their orbits 
must be reciprocally as the squares of their distances from the 
centers about which they revolve; and thereby compared the 
force requisite to keep the Moon in her orbit with the force of 
gravity at the surface of the Earth, and found them to answer 
pretty nearly." An intellectual leap of this sort — although seldom 
as great as Newton's — is involved in the creation of any theory 
or model. It is a process of induction, and it goes beyond the 
facts immediately at hand. Some facts may even be temporarily 
brushed aside or ignored in the interests of pursuing the main 
idea, for a partially correct theory is often better than no theory 
at all. And at all stages there is a constant interplay between 
experiment and theory, in the process of which fresh observations 
are continually suggesting themselves and modification of the 
theory is an ever-present possibility. The following diagram, the 
relevance of which goes beyond the realm of classical mechanics, 
suggests this pattern of man's investigation of matter and motion. 

Laws of Motion 

and Experiments 




Laws of Force 




The enormous success of classical mechanics made it seem, 
at one stage, that nothing more was needed to account for the 
whole world of physical phenomena. This belief reached a 
pinnacle toward the end of the nineteenth century, when some 

7 Prologue 

optimistic physicists felt that physics was, in principle, complete. 
They could hardly have chosen a more unfortunate time at which 
to form such a conclusion, for within the next few decades 
physics underwent its greatest upheaval since Newton. The dis- 
covery of radioactivity, of the electron and the nucleus, and the 
subtleties of electromagnetism, called for fundamentally new 
ideas. Thus we know today that Newtonian mechanics, like 
every physical theory, has its fundamental limitations. The 
analysis of motions at extremely high speeds requires the use of 
modified descriptions of space and time, as spelled out by Albert 
Einstein's special theory of relativity. In the analysis of phe- 
nomena on the atomic or subatomic scale, the still more drastic 
modifications described by quantum theory are required. And 
Newton's particular version of gravitational theory, for all its 
success, has had to admit modifications embodied in Einstein's 
general theory of relativity. But this does not alter the fact that, 
in an enormous range and variety of situations, Newtonian 
mechanics provides us with the means to analyze and predict the 
motions of physical objects, from electrons to galaxies. Its range 
of validity, and its limits, are indicated very qualitatively in the 

figure below. 

In developing the subject of classical mechanics in this book, 
we shall try to indicate how the horizons of its application to the 
physical world, and the horizons of one's own view, can be 
gradually broadened. Mechanics, as we shall try to present it, is 
not at all a cut-and-dried subject that would justify its description 


10-'° m 

10 !0 m 


8 Proloeuc 

as "applied mathematics," in which the rules of the game are 
given at the outset and in which one's only concern is with apply- 
ing the rules to a variety of situations. We wish to offer a dif- 
ferent approach, in which at every stage one can be conscious of 
working with partial or limited data and of making use of as- 
sumptions that cannot be rigorously justifled. But this is the 
essence of doing physics. Newton himself said as much. At the 
beginning of Book III of the Principia he propounds four "Rules 
of Reasoning in Philosophy," of which the last runs as follows: 
"In experimental philosophy we are to look upon proposi- 
tions inferred by general induction from phenomena as accurately 
or very nearly true, notwithstanding any contrary hypotheses 
that may be imagined, till such time as other phenomena occur, 
by which they may either be made more accurate, or liable to 
exceptions." The person who waits for complete information is 
on the way to dooming himself never to finish an experiment or 
to construct a useful theory. Lest this should be taken, however, 
as an encouragement to slipshod or superficial thinking, we shall 
end this introduction with a little fable due to George Polya. 1 
He writes as a mathematician, but the moral for physicists (and 
others) is clear. 

The Logician, the Mathematician, 
the Physicist, and the Engineer 

"Look at this mathematician," said the logician. "He observes 
that the first 99 numbers are less than 100 and infers, hence, by 
what he calls induction, that all numbers are less than a hundred." 
"A physicist believes," said the mathematician, "that 60 is 
divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. He examines a few more cases, 
such as 10, 20, and 30, taken at random (as he says). Since 60 is 
also divisible by these, he considers the experimental evidence 
sufficient." "Yes, but look at the engineers," said the physicist. 
"An engineer suspected that all odd numbers are prime numbers. 
At any rate, 1 can be considered as a prime number, he argued. 
Then there come 3, 5, and 7, all indubitably primes. Then there 
comes 9; an awkward case; it does not seem to be a prime num- 

'This cautionary tale is to be found in a book entitled Induction and Analogy 
in Mathematics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1954. This 
volume and its companion, Patterns of Plausible Inference, make delightful 
reading for any scientist. 

9 Prologuc 

ber. Yet 1 1 and 13 are certainly primes. 'Corning back to 9,' he 
said, 'I conclude that 9 must be an experimental error.' " But 
having done his teasing, Polya adds these remarks. 

It is only too obvious that induction can lead to error. Yet it is 
remarkable that induction sometimes leads to truth, since the 
chances of error seem so overwhelming. Should we begin with 
the study of the obvious cases in which induction fails, or with 
the study of those remarkable cases in which induction succeeds? 
The study of precious stones is understandably more attractive 
than that of ordinary pebbles and, moreover, it was much more 
the precious stones than the pebbles that led the mineralogists 
to the wonderful science of crystallography. 

With that encouragement, we shall, in Chapter l, begin our 
approach to the study of classical mechanics, which is one of the 
most perfect and polished gems in the physicist's treasury. We 
end this Prologue, however, with some preparatory exercises. 


The literal meaning of the phrase "hors d'oeuvre" is "outside 
the work." The exercises below correspond exactly to that 
definition, although it is hoped that they will also whet the 
appetite as hors d'oeuvres should. They deal mostly with order- 
of-magnitude estimates (i.e., estimates to the nearest power of 10) 
and judicious approximations— things that play an important 
role in a physicist's approach to problems but seldom get em- 
phasized or systematically presented in textbooks. For example, 
everybody learns the binomial theorem, but how many students 
think of it as a useful tool for obtaining a quite good value for 
the hypotenuse of a right triangle, by the approximation 

^ + b^'^a{\+^ 

where we assume b < a? (Even in the worst possible case, with 
b = a, the result is wrong by only about 6 percent — 1.5 instead 
of 1.414 . . . .) Moreover, it takes practice and some conscious 
effort to develop the habit of assessing, quite crudely, the magni- 
tudes of quantities and the relative importance of various pos- 
sible effects in a physical system. For example, in dealing with 
objects moving through liquids, can one quickly decide whether 

10 Prologue 

viscosity or turbulence is going to be the chief source of resistance 
for an object of given speed and linear dimensions? An awareness 
of the effects of changes of scale can give valuable insights into 
the properties of systems. [A beautiful example of this is the 
well-known essay by J. B. S. Haldane, "On Being the Right 
Size," which is reprinted in The World of Mathematics, Vol. II 
(J. R. Newman, ed.), Simon and Schuster, New York, 1956.] 
By the use of such methods and ways of thought one can deepen 
one's appreciation of physical phenomena and can improve one's 
feeling for what the world is like and how it behaves. 

It is surprising how much one can do with the help of a 
relatively small stock of primary information — which might in- 
clude such items as the following: 

Physical Magnitudes 

Gravitational acceleration (g) 

Densities of solids and liquids 

Density of air at sea level 

Length of day 

Length of year 

Earth's radius 

Angle subtended by finger thickness 

at arm's length 
Thickness of paper 
Mass of a paperclip 
Highest mountains, deepest oceans 
Earth-moon separation 
Earth-sun separation 
Atmospheric pressure 

Avogadro's number 
Atomic masses 

Linear dimensions of atoms 
Molecules/cm 3 i n gas at STP 
Atoms/cm 3 in solids 
Elementary charge (e) 
Electron mass 
Speed of light 
Wavelength of light 

10 m/sec' 2 

10 3 -10 4 kg/m 3 

1 kg/m 3 (approx.) 

10 5 sec (approx.) 

3.16 X 10 7 sec « I0 75 sec 

6400 km 

1° (approx.) 
0.1 mm (approx.) 
0.5 g (approx.) 
10 km (approx.) 
3.8 X 10 5 km 

1.5 X 10 8 km 
Equivalent to weight of 

1 kg/cm 2 or a 10-m 
column of water 
6.0 X 10 23 

1.6 X 10- 27 kgto 
4 X 10 _25 kg 

10 _,0 m (approx.) 

2.7 X 10 13 
10 23 (approx.) 
1.6 X lO -1 9 C 
10~ 30 kg (approx.) 
3 X 10 8 m/sec 

6 X 10 -7 m (approx.) 

11 EKcrcises- hors d'oeuvres 

Malhematical Magnitudes 

w 2 m 10 log,,, 4 m 0.60 

e « 2.7 log, o e ~ 0.43 

log 10 2«0.30 log, T«0.50 
log, o 3 m 0.48 log c 10 « 2.3 
Angle (radians) = arc length/radius. Full circle = 2jrrad. 

1 rad « 0.16 X full circle « 57°. 
Solid angle (steradians) = area/(radius) 2 . Full sphere = 4*- sr. 
1 sr ~ 0.08 X full sphere. 


Binomial theorem: 
Forx« 1, (1 + x) n m 1 + «* 

e.g., (1 + x) 3 « 1 + 3* 

(1 -x)" 2 a 1 - **« (1 +x)- 1/2 

For b « a, (a + b)" - fl*(l + jjjY ~ a n (l+n?\ 

Othcr expansions: 

e 3 

For 6 « 1 rad, sin fl w > 


e 2 

cos d « 1 ► 1 


For a: « 1, log« (1 + x) ~ x 

log, (l +Jc)« 0.43x 

No answers are given to the problems that follow. For 
most of them, you yourself will be the best judge. You may want 
to turn to an encyclopedia or other reference book to check 
some of your assumptions or conclusions. If you are not prepared 
at this point to tackle them all, don't worry; you can always 
return to them later. 

/ What is the order of magnitude of the number of times that the 
earth has rotated on its axis since the solar system was formed? 

2 During the average lifetime of a human being, how many heart- 
beats are there ? How many breaths ? 

3 Make reasoned estimates of (a) the total number of ancestors ytou 
would have (ignoring inbreeding) since the beginning of the human 
race, and (b) the number of hairs on your head. 

4 The present world population (human) is about 3 X 10°. 

(a) How many squarc kilometers of land are there per person? 

12 Prologue 

How many feet long is the side of a square of that area? 

(b) If one assumes that the population has been doubling every 
50 years throughout the existence of the human race, when did Adam 
and Eve start it all ? If the doubling every 50 years were to continue, 
how long would it be before people were standing shoulder to shoulder 
over all the land area of the world? 

5 Estimate the order of magnitude of the mass of (a) a speck of dust ; 
(b) a grain of sak (or sugar, or sand); (c) a mouse; (d) an elephant; 
(e) the water corresponding to 1 in. of rainfall over 1 square mile; 
(0 a small hill, 500 ft high; and (g) Mount Everest. 

6 Estimate the order of magnilude of the number of atoms in (a) a 
pin's head, (b) a human being, (c) the earth's atmosphere, and (d) the 
whole earth. 

7 Estimate the fraction of the total mass of the earth that is now in 
the form of living things. 

8 Estimate (a) the total volume of ocean water on the earth, and 
(b) the total mass of sah in all the oceans. 

9 It is estimated that there are about 10 80 protons in the (known) 
universe. If all these were lumped into a sphere so that they were 
just touching, what would the radius of the sphere be? Ignore the 
spaces left when spherical objects are packed and takc the radius of a 
proton to be about 10~ 15 m. 

10 The sun is losing mass (in the form of radiant energy) at the rate of 
about 4 million tons per second. What fraction of its mass has it lost 
during the lifetime of the solar system ? 

11 Estimate the time in minutcs that it would take for a theatre audience 
of about 1000 people to use up 10% of the available oxygen if the build- 
ing were sealed. The average adult absorbs about one sixth of the 
oxygen that he or she inhales at each breath. 

12 Solar energy falls on the earth at the rate of about 2 cal/cm 2 /min. 
Estimate the amount of power, in megawatts or horsepower, repre- 
sented by the solar energy falling on an area of 100 square miles — 
about the area of a good-sized city. How would this comparc with the 
total power requirementsofsuch a city? (1 cal = 4.2 J; 1 W = U/sec; 
1 hp = 746 W.) 

13 Starting from an estimate of the total mileage that an automobile 
tire will give before wearing out, estimate what thickness of rubber is 
worn off during one revolution of the wheel. Consider the possible 
physical significance of the result. (With acknowledgment to E. M. 
Rogers, Physics for the lnquiring Mind, Princeton University Press, 
Princeton, N. J., 1%0.) 

14 An ine.vpensive wristwatch is found to lose 2 min/day. 
(a) What is its fractional dcviation from the correct rate? 

13 Exercises — hors d'oei v re s 

(b) By how much could the length of a ruler (nominally 1 ft long) 
differ from exactly 12 in. and still be fractionally as accurate as the 
watch ? 

15 The astronomer Tycho Brahe made observations on the angular 
posilions of stars and planets by using a quadrant, with one peephole 
at its center of curvature and another peephole mounted on the arc. 
One such quadrant had a radius of about 2 m, and Tycho's measure- 
ments could usually be trusted to 1 minute of arc (^g°). What diameter 
of peepholes would havc been needed for him to attain this accuracy ? 

16 Jupiter has a mass about 300 times that of the earth, but its mean 
density is only about one fifth that of the earth. 

(a) What radius would a planet of Jupiter's mass and earth's 
density have? 

(b) What radius would a planet of earth's mass and Jupiter's 
density have ? 

17 Identical spheres of material are tightly packed in a given volume 
of space. 

(a) Consider why one does not need to know the radius of the 
spheres, but only the density of the material, in order to calculate the 
total mass contained in the volume, provided that the linear dimensions 
of the volume are large compared to the radius of the individual spheres. 

(b) Consider the possibility of packing more material if two sizes 
of spheres may be chosen and used. 

(c) Show that the total surface area of the spheres of part (a) does 
depend on the radius of the spheres (an important consideration in 
the design of such things as filters, which absorb in proportion to the 
total exposed surface area within a given volume). 

18 Calculate the ratio of surface area to volume for (a) a sphere of 
radius r, (b) a cube of edge a, and (c) a right circular cylinder of 
diameter and height both equal to d. For a given value of the volume, 
which of these shapes has the greatest surface area ? The least surface 

19 How many seconds of arc does the diameter of the earth subtend 
at the sun? At what distance from an observer should a football be 
placed to subtend an equal angle? 

20 From the time the lower limb of the sun touches the horizon it 
takes approximately 2 min for the sun to disappear beneath the horizon. 

(a) Approximately what angle (exprcssed both in degrees and in 
radians) does the diameter of the sun subtend at the earth ? 

(b) At what distance from your eye does a coin of about ^-in. 
diameter (e.g., a dime or a nickel) just block out the disk of the sun? 

(c) What solid angle (in steradians) does the sun subtend at the 

14 Prologue 

21 How many inches per mile does a terrestrial great circle (e.g., a 
meridian of longitude) deviate from a straight line ? 

22 A crude measure of the roughness of a nearly spherical surface 
could be defined by Ar/r, where Ar is the height or depth of local 
irregularities. Estimate this ratio for an orange, a ping-pong ball, and 
the earth. 

23 What is the probability (expressed as 1 chance in 10") that a good- 
sized meteorite falling to earth would strike a man-made structure? 
A human ? 

24 Two students want to measure the speed of sound by the following 
procedure. One of them, positioned some distance away from the 
other, sets off a firecracker. The second student starts a stopwatch 
when he sees the flash and stops it when he hears the bang. The speed 
of sound in air is roughly 300 m/scc, and the students must admit the 
possibility of an error (of undetermined sign) of perhaps 0.3 sec in the 
elapsed time recorded. If they wish to keep the error in the measured 
speed of sound to within 5%, what is the minimum distance over which 
they can perform the experiment? 

25 A right triangle has sides of length 5 m and 1 m adjoining the right 
angle. Calculate the length of the hypotenuse from the binomial ex- 
pansion to two terms only, and estimate the fractional error in this 
approximate result. 

26 The radius of a sphere is measured with an uncertainty of 1%. 
What is the percentage uncertainty in the volume? 

27 Construct a piece of semilogarithmic graph paper by using the 
graduations on your slide rulc to mark off the ordinates and a normal 
ruler to mark off the abscissa. On this piece of paper draw a graph of 
the function y = 2 X . 

28 The subjective sensations of loudness or brightness have bcen 
judged to be approximately proportional to the logarithm of the 
intensity, so that equal mulliples of intensity are associated with equal 
arithmetic increases in sensation. (For example, intensities propor- 
tional to 2, 4, 8, and 16 would correspond to equal increases in sensa- 
tion.) In acoustics, this has led to the measurement of sound intensities 
in decibels. Taking as a reference value the intensity /o of the faintest 
audible sound, the decibel level of a sound of intensity / is defined by 
the equation 

dB = lOlogio 


(a) An intolerable noise level is represented by about 120 dB. By 
what factor does the intensity of such a sound exceed the threshold 
intensity /o? 

15 Exercises — hors d'oeuvres 

(b) A similar logarithmic scale is used to describe the relative 
brightness of stars (as seen from the earth) in terms of magnitudes. 
Stars differing by "one magnitude" have a ratio of apparent brightness 
equal to about 2.5. Thus a "first-magnitude" (very bright) star is 2.5 
times brighter than a second-magnitude star, (2.5) 2 times brighter 
than a third-magnitude star, and so on. (These differences are due 
largely to differences of distance.) The faintest stars detectable with the 
200-in. Palomar telescope are of about the twenty-fourth magnitude. 
By what factor is the amount of light reaching us from such a star less 
than we receive from a first-magnitude star ? 

29 The universe appears to be undergoing a general expansion in which 
the galaxies are receding from us at speeds proportional to their dis- 
tances. This is described by Hubble's law, v = «r, where the con- 
stant a corresponds to v becoming equal to the speed of light, c 
(= 3 X 10 8 m/sec), at r « 10 26 m. This would imply that the mean 
mass per unit volume in the universe is decreasing with time. 

(a) Suppose that the universe is represented by a sphere of volume 
V at any instant. Show that the fractional increase of volume per unit 
time is given by 

1 dV 

= 3a 

V dt 

(b) Calculate the fractional decrease of mean density per second 
and per century. 

30 The table lists the mean orbit radii of successivc planets expressed in 
terms of the earth's orbit radius. The planets are numbered in order («): 

Planet r/rg 






















(a) Make a graph in which \og(r/r E ) is ordinate and the number 
n is abscissa. (Or, alternatively, plot values of r /r e against n on semi- 
logarithmic paper.) On this samc graph, replot the points for Jupiter, 
Saturn, and Uranus at values of n increased by unity (i.e., at n = 6, 
7, and 8). The points representing the seven planets can thcn be reason- 
ably well fitted by a straight line. 

(b) If n = 5 in the revised plot is taken to represent the asteroid 
belt between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter, what value of r/r E would 

16 Prologue 

your graph imply for this ? Compare with the actual mean radius of 
the asteroid belt. 

(c) If n = 9 is taken to suggest an orbit radius for the next planet 
(Neptune) beyond Uranus, what value of r/re would your graph 
imply ? Compare with the observed value. 

(d) Consider whether, in the light of (b) and (c), your graph can 
be regarded as the expression of a physical law with predictive value. 
(As a matter of history, it was so used. See the account of the dis- 
covery of Neptune near the end of Chapter 8.) 





Autore J S. NEWTON, Irin. Coli. Cantab. Soc. Mathefeos 
Profeflbre Lucafiano, & Socictatis Regalis Sodalt. 


S. P E P Y S, Reg. Soc. P R JE S E S. 
Juiii 5. 1686. 

L N D I N I, 

Juflii Soaetatis Rcgi* ac Typis Jofepbi Strealcr. Proftat apud 
plures Bibliopolas. Amo MDCLXXXVII. 

Facsimile oflhe title page oflhe firsl edilion of Newion's 
Principia (published 1687). It may be seen thal Ihe work 
was officially accepted by Ihe Royal Sociely of London 
in July, 1686, when ils president was thefamous diarist 
Samuel Pepys (who was also Secretary to Ihe Admirally 
at Ihe time). 


The approach to 



// seems probable to me, that God in the Beginningfortrid 
Matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable 
Particles .... 

newton, Opticks (1730) 


A universe of particles 


the essence of the Newtonian approach to mechanics is that 
the motion of a given object is analyzed in terms of the forces to 
which it is subjected by its environment. Thus from the very 
outset we are concerned with discrete objects of various kinds. 
A special interest attaches to objects that can be treated as if 
they are point masses; such objects are called particles. 1 In the 
strictest sense there is nothing in nature that fits this definition. 
Nevertheless, you have lived for years in a world of particles — 
electrons, atoms, baseballs, earth satellites, stars, galaxies — and 
have an excellent idea of what a particle is. If you have read 
George Orwell's famous political satire Animal Farm, you may 
remember the cynical proclamation : "Ali animals are equal, 
but some animals are more equal than others." In somewhat 
the same way, you may feel that some particles (electrons or 
protons, for example) are more particulate than others. But in 
any case the judgement as to whether something is a particle can 
only be made in terms of specific questions — specific kinds of 
experiments and observations. 

And the answer to the question "Is such and such an object 
a particle?" is not a clear-cut yes or no, but "It depends." For 
example, atoms and atomic nuclei will look (i.e., behave) like 

'Actually, Newton himself reserved the word "particle" to denote what we 
might now call "fundamental particles"— atoms and other such natural 
building blocks — but the usage has since changed. 


Fig. 1-1 Photograph 
of a portion of the 
night sky. (Photograph 
from the Hale 

particles if you don't hit them too hard. Planets and stars will 
look like particles (both visually and in behavior) if you get far 
enough away from them (see Fig. 1-1). But every one of these 
objects has spatial extension and an internal structure, and there 
will always be circumstances in which these features must be 
taken into account. Very often this will be done by picturing a 
given object not as a single point particle but as an assemblage 
of such ideal particles, more or less firmly connected to one 
another. (If the connections are sufficiently strong, it may be 
possible to make use of another fiction — the ideal "rigid body" — 
that further simplifies the analysis of rotational motions, in 
particular.) For the moment, however, we shall restrict ourselves 

22 A universe of particles 

to a consideration of objects that exist as recognizable, individual 
entities and behave, in appropriate circumstances, as particles 
in the idealized dynamical sense. 

What sort of information do we need to build up a good 
description of a particle? Here are a few obvious items, which 
we write down without any suggestion that the list is exhaustive 
(or, for that matter, sharply categorized): 

1. Mass 

2. Size 

3. Shape 

4. Internal structure 

5. Electric charge 

6. Magnetic properties 

7. Interaction with other particles of the same kind 

8. Interaction with different sorts of particles 

Partial though that list may be, it is already formidable, and 
it would not be realistic to tackle it all at once. So we ask a more 
modest question : What is the smalkst number of properties that 
suffkes to characterize a particle? If we are concerned with the 
so-called "elementary" particles (electrons, mesons, etc), the 
state of charge (positive, negative, or neutral) is an important 
datum, along with the mass, and these two may be sufficient to 
identify such a particle in many circumstances. Most other 
objects, composed of large numbers of atoms, are normally 
electrically neutral, and in any event the mass alone is for many 
purposes the only property that counts in considering a particle's 
dynamic behavior — provided we take the forces acting on it as 
being independently specified. ' It is, however, useful to know, 
at least approximately, the size also. Not only is this one of our 
most informative pieces of data concerning any object, but its 
magnitude will help to tell us whether, in given circumstances, 
the particle may reasonably be treated as a point mass. 

Recognizing, then, that many of the finer details will have 
to be filled in later, we shall begin with a minimal description in 
which particles are objects possessing mass and size. Our survey 
is not exhaustive or detailed. On the contrary, we have sought 

'Of course, if we want to treat the forces as being derived from characteristic 
interactions of the body with its surroundings (e.g., by gravitatton), then the 
laws of interaction must also be known. That is the subject of Chapter 5. 

23 The particulate view 

to reduce it to a minimum, consistent with illustrating the gen- 
eral scheme of things, by considering only the masses and the 
linear dimensions of some typical particles. We shall begin with 
the smallest and least massive particles and go up the scale until 
we reach what appears to be a fundamental limit. You will 
appreciate that this account, brief though it is, draws upon the 
results of a tremendous amount of painstaking observation and 
research in diverse fields. 

A note on units 

In this book we shall most frequently employ the meter-kilogram- 
second (MKS) metric system. You are probably already familiar 
with it, at least for the basic measures of mass, length, and time. 
If not, you should learn it at this time. We shall, however, make 
occasional use of other measures. In mechanics the conversion 
from one system of measurement to another presents no problem, 
because it is just a matter of applying simple numerical factors. 
(This is in contrast to electromagnetism, where the particular 
choice of primary quantities affects the detailed formulation of 
the theory.) A tabulation of MKS and other units is given in the 


The principal building blocks of matter from the standpoint 
of physics and chemistry are electrons, protons, and neutrons. 
Protons and neutrons are virtually equivalent as constituents 
of atomic nuclei and are lumped together under the generic title 
nucleons. The vast amount of research on the so-called ele- 
mentary particles, and on the structure of nucleons, has not 
brought forth any evidence for particles notably smaller (or 
notably less massive) than those that were known to science 50 
years ago. Thus, although the study of subatomic particles is a 
field of very great richness and complexity, filled with bizarre and 
previously unsuspected phenomena, the microscopic limits of 
the physical world are still well represented by such familiar 
particles as electrons and protons. 

Theelectron,withamassofaboutl(r 30 kg(9.1 X l(T 31 kg 
to be more precise), is by far the lightest (by more than three 

24 A universc of particles 

powers of 10) of the familiar constituents of matter. (The elusive 
neutrino, emitted in radioactive beta decay, appears to have no 
mass at all. This puts it in a rather special category!) The size 
of the electron is not something that can be unequivocally stated. 
Indeed, the concept of size is not sharply or uniquely defined for 
any object. If, however, we regard the electron as a sphere of 
electric charge, its radius can be estimated to be of the order of 
10 -15 m. In our present state of knowledge, the electron can 
properly be regarded as a fundamental particle, in the sense that 
there is no evidence that it can be analyzed into other constituents. 
The nucleon, with a mass of 1.67 X 10~ 27 kg, is the other 
basic ingredient of atoms. In its electrically charged form — the 
proton — it is (like the electron) completely stable; that is, it 
survives indefinitely in isolation. In its electrically neutral form — 
the neutron — it cannot survive in isolation but decays radio- 
actively (with a half-life of about 13 min) into a proton, an 
electron, and a neutrino. The fact that neutrons spontaneously 
give birth to the constituents of hydrogen atoms has led some 
cosmologists to suggest that neutrons represent the true primeval 
particles of the universe — but that is just a speculation. Nucleons 
have a diameter of about 3 X 10 -15 m — by which we mean 
that the nuclear matter appears to be confined within a moderately 
well defined region of this size. Unlike electrons, nucleons seem 
to have a quite complex internal structure, in which various types 
of mesons are incorporated. But from the standpoint of atomic 
physics they can be regarded as primary particles. 


The combination of protons and neutrons to form nuclei pro- 
vides the basis for the various forms of stable, ordinary matter 
as we know it. The smallest and lightest nucleus is of course the 
individual proton. The heaviest naturally occurring nucleus 
(that of 238 U)— contains 238 nucleons and has a mass of 4.0 X 
10 -25 kg. All nuclei have about the same mass per unit volume, 
so that their diameters are roughly proportional to the cube 
roots of the numbers of the nucleons. Thus nuclear diameters 
cover a range from about 3 X 10~ 15 to 2 X 10~ 14 m. 

A unit of distance has been defined that is very convenient 
when dealing with nuclear dimensions. It is named after the 

25 Alomic nuclei 


Italian physicist Enrico Fermi 1 : 

lfermi(F) = H)" 18 m = 10- 13 cm 
Thus the range of nuciear diameters is from about 3 to 20 F. 

The density of nuciear matter is enormous. Given that the 
uranium nucleus has a mass of about 4 X 10 -25 kg and a radius 
of about 10 F, you can deduce (do it!) that its density is about 
10 17 kg/m 3 . This is so vast (it is larger, by a factor of 10 14 , 
than the density of water) that we really cannot apprehend it, 
although we now have evidence that some astronomical objects 
(neutron stars) are composed of this nuciear matter in bulk. 

A great deal was learned about atomic masses long before it was 
possible to count individual atoms. From the concepts of valence 
and chemical combinations, chemists established a relative mass 
scale based on assigning to hydrogen a mass of 1 . The mole was 
introduced as that amount of any element or compound whose 
mass in grams was equal numerically to its relative mass on this 
scale. Furthermore, from the relative proportions of elements 
that combined to form compounds, it was known that a mole of 
any substance must contain the same unique number of atoms 
(or molecules in the case of compounds) — the number known as 
Avogadro's constant. But this number was itself unknown. 
Obviously, if the number could be determined, the mass of an 
individual atom could be found. 

The existence of characteristic mass transfers in electrolysis 
gave corroborative evidence on relative atomic masses but also 
pointed the way to absolute mass determinations, for it seemed 
clear that the electrolytic phenomena stemmed from a charac- 
teristic atomic charge unit. Ali that was necessary was to establish 
the size of this unit (e)— a feat finally achieved in Millikan's 
precision measurements in 1909. Some representative atomic 
mass values are listed in Table 1-1. 

'E. Fermi (1901-1954) was the greatest Italian physicist since Galileo and 
one of the most distinguished scientists of the twentieth century, gifted in 
both theoretical and experimental work. He achieved popular fame as the 
man who produced the first self-sustained nuciear chain reaction, at the Uni- 
versity of Chicago in 1942. 

26 A universe of particles 




mass transfer, 






per ion 

relative mass 



1.04 X lO" 8 



1.67 X lO" 27 


6.22 X 10- 8 



2.00 X 10" 26 


8.29 X 10- 8 



2.66 X lO" 26 


2.38 X 10~ 7 



3.81 X K)- 26 


9.32 X lO" 8 



4.48 X 10 -26 


4.05 X 10" 7 



6.49 X lO -26 


3.39 X 10- 7 



1.09 X 10- 2S 


1.118 X 10- 6 



1.79 X 10~ 2S 

Modern precision measurements of atomic masses are based 
on mass spectroscopy (see p. 206 for an account of the principles) 
and are quoted in terms of an atomic mass unit (amu). This is 
now defined as tV of the mass of the isotope carbon 12. 

lamu = 1.66043 X 10" 27 kg 

Since almost all the mass of any atom is concentrated in its 
nucleus (99.95% for hydrogen, rising to 99.98% for uranium), 
we can say that to a first approximation the mass of an atom is 
just the mass of its nucleus. But, in terms of size, the atom 
represents a leap of many orders of magnitude. Nuclear diam- 
eters, as we have just seen, are of the order of 10 -14 m. Atomic 
diameters are typically about 10 4 times larger than this — i.e., of 
the order of 10 -1 ° m. One way of getting a feeling for what this 
factor means is to consider that if the dot on a printed letter i on 
this page is taken to represent a medium-weight nucleus, the outer 
boundary of the atom is about 10 ft away. Think of a grain of 
fine sand suspended in the niiddle of your bedroom or study, and 
you will get a feeling for what that means in three dimensions. 
(Nuclei are really very small.) 

It is very convenient to take 10 -10 m as a unit of distance 
in describing atomic sizes or interatomic distances in solids and 
other condensed states in which the atoms are closely packed. 
The unit is named after the nineteenth-century Swedish physicist, 
A. J. Angstrom: 

1 angstrom (A) = 10 -10 m = 10~ 8 cm = 10 5 F 

It is noteworthy that the heaviest atoms are not markedly bigger 
than the lightest ones, although there are systematic variations, 

27 Atoms 

Fig. 1-2 Relative atotnic radii (iiiferred from atomic 
volumes) versus atomic mass number, A. 

with pronounced peaks at the alkali atoms, as one progresses 
through the periodic table of the elements (see Fig. 1-2). 

Atoms are so small that it is hard to develop any real ap- 
preciation of the enormous numbers of atoms present in even 
the tiniest objects. For example, the smallest object that can be 
seen with a good microscope has a diameter of perhaps a few 
tenths of a micron anda mass of the order of 10~ ' 7 to 10~ ' fi kg. 
This minuscule object nevertheless contains something like 1 
billion atoms. Or (to take another example) a very good labora- 
tory vacuum may contain residual gas at a pressure of a few times 
10 -1 ' of atmospheric. One cubic centimeter of such a vacuum 
would likewise contain about 1 billion atoms. 

The atoms or molecules of a gas at normal atmospheric 
pressure are separated from one another, on the average, by 
about 10 times their diameter. This justifies (although only 
barely) the picture of a gas as a collection of particles that move 
independently of one another most of the time. 


Our first introduction to molecules is likely to be in an elementary 
chemistry course, which very reasonably limits its attention to 
simple molecules made up of small numbers of atoms — H 2 0, 
C0 2) Na 2 S0 4 , C 6 H 6 , and the like, with molecular weights of 
the order of 10 or 100 and with diameters of a few angstroms. 

28 A universe of particles 

mouth virus 

Edge of Bacterium coli 

Bushy stunt virus 

fever virus' 

|Tobacco mosaic virus ( half-le 


Fig 1-3 Sizes of ■ Hemocyanin molecule 16,000,000 

microscopic and sub- mo Hemoglobin molecule (63,000) 

microscopic objects, m A | bumin m0 |ecule (40,000) 

from bacteria down to _ Amino acjd chain _ 10 units (1|30 0) 

, . „ r, i t -a * Su 6 ar molecule (350) 

J. A. V. Butler, Inside _ ,,„„ % 

the Living Cell, ' Smgle am,n0 aC,d moleCule (130) 

George Allen & 

Vnwin, London, 1959.) 

0.1 u.= 


These then, do not represent much of an advance, either in size 
or in mass, on the individual atoms we have just been discussing. 
But through the development of biochemistry and biophysics we 
have come to know of molecules of remarkable size and com- 
plexity. We can feel justified in regarding them as particles on 
the strength of such features as a unique molecular weight for 
all molecules of a given type. The biggest objects that are de- 
scribable as single molecules have molecular weights of the order 
of 10 7 amu— hence masses of the order of 10~ 20 kg and lengths 
of the order of 10~ 7 m. Such objects are, however, far more 
important for their structure, and for their involvement in bio- 
logical processes, than for their rather precarious status as 
particles. The particle dynamics of a protein molecule is a pretty 
slim subject — limited perhaps to the behavior of the molecule in 
a centrifuge — whereas the elucidation of its structure is a study 
that requires (and merits) the most intensive efforts of brilliant 
chemists and crystallographers. It would be both presumptuous 
and inappropriate to attempt to discuss such matters here, but 
it is perhaps worth indicating the range of magnitudes of such 
particles with the help of Fig. 1-3. A convenient unit of length 

29 Molecules; living cells 

for describing biological systems is the micron: 
1 micron (m) = lO" 9 m = 10 4 A 

The largest object shown in Fig. 1-3 (a bacterium) is about 1m 
across and would be visible in a good microscope (for which the 
limit of resolution is about 0.2/n — rather less than one wavelength 
of light). 

Figure 1-3 includes some viruses, which have a peculiar 
status between living and nonliving — possessed of a rather 
definite size and mass, isolatable (perhaps as a crystalline sub- 
stance), yet able to multiply in a suitable environment. Figure 
1-4 is an electron-microscope photograph of some virus particles. 
These are almost the smallest particles of matter of which we can 
form a clear image in the ordinary photographic sense. (You 
have perhaps seen "photographs" of atomic arrangements as 
observed with the device called a field ion microscope. These 
are not direct images of individual atoms, although the pattern 

Fig. 1-4 Sphericat 
particles of 
polio virus. 
[C. E. Schwerdt et 
al., Proc. Soc. Exptl. 
Biol. Med., 86, 310 
(1954). Photograph 
courtesy of Robley 
C. Williams.] 

30 A. universe of particles 

does reveal their spatial relationships.) 1 

If we go one step further along this biological road, then 
of course we come to the living cell, which has the kind of sig- 
nificance for a biologist that the atom has for a physical scientist. 
Certainly it is appropriate to regard biological cells as particles, 
albeit of such a special kind that the study of most of them lies 
outside physics. They do, however, provide us with some con- 
venient reference points on our scale of physical magnitudes, and 
that is our only reason for mentioning them here — except, per- 
haps, for the matter of reminding ourselves that biological systems 
also belong within a framework defined by the fundamental 
atomic interactions. 

Although some single cells may be less than 1/* (certain 
bacteria) or more than 1 cm (e.g., the yolk of a hen's egg), the 
cells of most living organisms have diameters of the order of 
I0~ 5 m (1<V) on the average. Thus a human being, with a 
volume of about 0. 1 m 3 , contains about 10 ' 4 cells, each of which 
(on the average) contains about 10 l4 atoms. 


Vast areas of our earth arc covered with particles that have come 
from the breaking down of massive rock formations. These 
particles, predominantly of quartz (crystalline Si0 2 ), are chem- 
ically very inert and are just the kind of objects to which the 
word "particle" applies in ordinary speech — small but visible, 
and inanimate. The earth's surface, and the atmosphere above 
that surface, are loaded with such particles. The biggest ones 
(say, of the order of 1 mm across) rest more or less firmly on the 
ground. Others, orders of magnitude smaller, may be seen as 
motes of dust dancing in the sunlight, apparently showing no 
tendency to fail. The fate of a given particle depends on the 
combined effect of wind (or air resistance) and gravity. Ac- 
cumulations of windblown sand are found to be made up of 
particles from a maximum of about 1 mm diameter to a minimum 
of about 0.01 mm. Below that size the material tends to remain 
airborne, and the smallest dust particles are of the order of 

'Improvemcnts in electron- and proton-microscope technique reach further 
and further down into the world of small particles. In 1969 the helical struc- 
ture of a protein molecule was photographed in an electron microscope. 

31 Sand and dust 

Fig. 1-5 Size distribulion of particles found on or above the earlh's surface. 
(After R. A. Bagnold, The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes, 
Meihuen, London, 1941.) 

10 -4 mm (=0.1/*) diameter. Figure 1-5 shows an approximate 
classification of particle sizes for dust, sand, and other small 


In a range from the smallest sand grains to the largest man-made 
objects we are in the realm of our most immediate experience: 
things that are large enough to be apprehended by the unaided 
sight or touch, yet not so big that we cannot achieve a rather 
direct awareness of them. In ordinary human terms, 100 is al- 
ready a large number, and a factor of 1000 up or down in linear 
scale from human dimensions brings us close to the limits of 
anything that can properly be regarded as a f uli, first-hand con- 
tact with the physical world. Outside that domain we depend 
chiefly upon indirect evidence, imagination and analogy. 

Since the densities of most solid materials (as we find them 
in the earth's crust) are of the order of magnitude of a few 
thousand kg/m 3 , the range of diameters from a grain of sand 
(1 mm) to a cliff or a dam (1 km) implies a range of masses from 
about 1 mg to 10' 2 kg (i.e., 10 9 tons). Actually, if mass itself 
(or the weight associated with it under the gravitational con- 
ditions at the earth's surface) were to be our criterion, then the 
range we have just stated goes far beyond the span of human 
perceptions. In terms of weights, it would be fair to say that our 
direct experience gives us some feeling for objects as light as 
about 10 mg or as heavy as 1000 kg— i.e., up to a factor of 10 ±4 
with respect to a central value of the order of 0. 1 kg (or a few 

32 A universc of particles 


For an earthdweller going about his ordinary daily affairs, it is 
almost impossible— as well as unrealistic— to regard the earth as 
a particle. We cannot help but be aware, primarily, of the vast- 
ness of the earth and of the fact that man's greatest edifices are, 
at least in terms of physical size, totally insignificant modifica- 
tions of its surface. Yet if we can imagine ourselves backing off 
into space for 100 million miles or so, we can arrive at a very 
different point of view. The earth loses its special status and is 
placed on the same footing as the other planets. And all of them 
can, on this scale, be regarded as particles moving in their orbits 
about a much more massive particle, the sun. In Kepler's mathe- 
matical description of the orbits of the planets, and subsequently 
in Newton's dynamical theory of these motions, the planets could 
legitimately be regarded as point particles— their extent and 
internal structure were in no way relevant. The reason, of course, 
was the simple one that on the scale of the solar system the 
planets are little more than mere points, as is obvious whenever 
we look up into the night sky. The earth's diameter is only about 
10 -4 of the distance between earth and sun — and the sun's own 
diameter is only 10 -2 of the same distance. No wonder, then, 
that a good first approximation to the dynamics of the solar 
system can be obtained by taking such ratios to be zero. 

But we should not rest content with such an approximation; 
indeed, we cannot. When Newton turned his attention from the 
planetary orbits to the tides, the physical extent of the earth 
became a key feature, because it was only this that made possible 
the existence of tide-producing forces, through a significant 
change of the moon's gravitational effect over a distance equal 
to the earth's diameter. In any case, once we free ourselves of 
the restriction of dealing with terrestrial objects and terrestrial 
phenomena, the particles that comprise the solar system are 
among the first to claim our attention. 

The planets can be described as roughly spherical particles, 
somewhat flattened as a result of their own rotation. Their 
range of diameters is considerable — a factor of nearly 30 between 
Mercury and Jupiter. Since the mean densities do not differ 
really drastically (the densest is our earth, at 5.5 times the density 
of water), the masses cover a very great range indeed. Again the 
extremes are Mercury and Jupiter, and there is a factor of about 
6000 between their masses. Figure 1-6 depicts these principal 

33 Planets and satellites 

Fig. 1-6 Relative sizes of llre planets and the sun. 

planets in correct relative scale. The size of the sun, which has 
about the same density as Jupiter but 10 times the diameter and 
about 1000 times the mass, is indicated for comparison. The 
same data are presented in Table 1-2. 

TABLE 1-2: 


Mean radius, km 


M/M E 

Mean density, kg/m 3 


2.42 X 10 3 


















































(6.96 X 10 6 ) 


(3.33 X 10 5 ) 


The nine major planets represent almost all the mass of 
matter around the sun (and Jupiter alone accounts for almost 
two thirds of it), but the number of other captive objects is 
enormous. There are, first, the natural satellites. If we ignore 
man's contributions, there are about 30 known satellites of the 
planets, most of them extremely tiny in comparison with the 
planets to which they are tied. (Our own moon is relatively 
the largest, but even it has only a little over 1% of the mass of 
the earth.) These satellites have a very special dynamical in- 
terest, because from their motions it has been possible to infer 
the masses of the planets themselves. 

34 A universe of particles 


The planetary satellites are, however, vastly outnumbered 
by the minor planets, also called planetoids or asteroids. ' Tens 
of thousands of them are orbiting the sun in the region between 
the orbits of Mars and Jupiter. In size they range from 500 miles 
in diameter down to 1 mile or less, and they most probably come 
from the breakup of a larger body. If the astronomer Walter 
Baade's description of them — "the vermin of the skies" — is at 
all representative, they are not greatly beloved by professional 

A star is a magnificently complex structure, almost inconceivably 
gigantic by human standards and with a fascinating interior 
dynamics that involves nuclear reactions, gravitation, and elec- 
tromagnetism. Yet when we gaze out into space we see nothing 
of this, unless we look with the eye — and the instruments — of an 
astrophysicist. Instead, we see the stars as luminous points, 
which (in contrast to the planets) continue to appear as point 
sources when examined through even the most powerful tele- 
scopes. In relation to their diameters, in fact, stars are much 
farther away from each other than are the planets of our solar 

A convenient unit for specifying astronomical distances is 
the Hght-year, the distance light travels in a vacuum in 1 year: 

1 light-year - 9.46 X 10 15 m 

The nearest star to the sun is about 4 light-years away, or 
about 25,000,000,000,000 miles! A number of other stars that 
are near neighbors of the sun have mutual separations of the 
order of 10 light-years or 10 17 m, which makes the ratio of 
diameter to separation about 10 -7 or 10 -8 . A cluster or galaxy 
of stars is thus an excellent example of a system of massive point 
particles, despite the fantastically large size of the particles. The 
best vacua attainable in the laboratory scarcely approach a 
corresponding emptiness as given by the ratio of interparticle 
spacing to particle diameter. One must look to the extreme vacua 
of interstellar space, where there are regions containing less than 
one hydrogen atom per cubic centimeter, to find a still emptier 
kind of system. 

•The word "asteroid" derives from the star-like appearance of these tiny 
objects as seen through a telescope. 

35 Stars 


Most of the objects that are recognizable as stars are within 
the range of 10* 2 solar masses. In this sense our sun can be 
regarded as an average or typical star. In terms of size or lumi- 
nosity (total radiation) the range of variation is very much 
greater, but a worthwhile account of these features would really 
call for some discussion of the evolution and interior mechanism 
of stars; and this is certainly not the place to attempt it. 1 We 
shall content ourselves, therefore, with remarking that the stars, 
regarded simply as aggregations of matter, with masses between 
about 10 28 and 10 32 kg (thus containing something of the order of 
10 54 to 10 58 atoms) can still be regarded as particles when we 
discuss their motions through space, because of the immense 
distances that separate them from one another. 

In 1900 the words "galaxy" and "universe" were regarded as 
being synonymous. Our universe appeared to consist primarily 
of a huge number of stars— many billions of them— scattered 
through space (see Fig. 1-1). Here and there, however, could be 
seen cloudy objects — nebulae — near enough or big enough to 
have an observable extent and even structure, as contrasted with 
the pointlike appearance of the stars. By 1900 many thousands 
of nebulae were known and catalogued. But what were they? 
To quote the astronomer Allan Sandage: "No one knew before 
1900. Very few people knew in 1920. AH astronomers knew 
after 1924." 2 For it was in 1924 that the great astronomer 
Edwin Hubble produced the conclusive proof that the nebulae 
were, in the picturesque phrase, "island universes" far outside 
the region of space occupied by the Milky Way, and that our 
own Galaxy (distinguished with a capital G) was only one of in- 
numerable systems of the same general kind. The first suggestion 
for such a picture of the universe was in fact put forward by the 
philosopher Immanuel Kant as long ago as 1755, but of course 
at that time it was no more than a pure hypothesis. 

; For extensive discussion, see (for example) F. Hoyle, Fronliers of Aslronomy, 

Harper & Row, New York, 1955. 

2 The story of this development is fascinatingly told by Sandage in his iniro- 

duction to a beautifui book entitled The Hubble Alias of Galaxies, published 

in 1961 by the Carnegie Institution of Washington, D. C. See also Hubble's 

own classic work, The Realm of the Nebulae, Dover Publications, New York, 


36 A universe of particles 

Fig. 1-7 Cluster of 
galaxies in the con- 
stellation Corona 
Borealis. Dislance 
about 600 million 
light-years. (Photo- 
graphfrom the Hale 

To quote Sandage again: "Galaxies are the largest single 
aggregates of stars in the universe. They are to astronomy what 
atoms are to physics." And so far as we can tell at present, they 
represent the largest particles in the observable scheme of things. 

A single galaxy may contain anywhere from about 10 6 to 
10 ' ' stars. Our own Galaxy appears to be one of the larger ones, 
with a diameter of about 10 21 m (10 5 light-years). As we have 
already seen, the stars within an individual galaxy are very widely 
spaced indeed, so that the average density of matter in a galaxy 
is very, very low — only about 10~ 20 kg/m 3 . But even so, galaxies 
represent notable concentrations of matter. On the average the 
spacing between galaxies is about 100 times their diameter, 
although there is a tendency for them to exist in clusters with 
separations perhaps 10 times less than this. Thus even the 
galaxies may, on an appropriately large scale, be regarded as 
particles, and the interactions between them may be approximated 
by treating them as points (see Fig. 1-7). 

Astronomical surveys indicate that space contains a roughly 
uniform concentration of galaxies. If we assume that this con- 
tinues to be true up to the theoretical limits of observation, we 
can make some estimate of the content of the universe as a whole. 
For it would appear that the universe can be represented by a 
sphere with a radius of about 10 10 light-years (10 26 m). The 

37 Galaxies 


galaxies in general appear to be receding from us with speeds 
proportional to their distances, and at a distance of 10 l0 light- 
years the recessional speed would reach the speed of light. At 
this speed, because of the "galactic red shift" (a form of the 
wavelength and frequency shift for radiation from a moving 
source — called in general the Doppler effect), the transmission 
of energy back to us would fail to zero, thus setting a natural 
limit to the extent of the knowable universe. 

If we take the average density of matter throughout space 
to be about 10 -a(i kg/m 3 (10 -6 of the density within an individ- 
ual galaxy) and assume the total volume of the universe to be 
of the order of (10 26 ) 3 , i.e., 10 78 m 3 , we arrive at a total mass 
of about 10 52 kg (equivalent to about 10 79 hydrogen atoms). 
This would then correspond to a total of about 10 il galaxies, 
each containing about 10" stars. Such numbers are of course so 
stupendous that they defy any attempt to form a mental image of 
the universe as a whole. But it scems that we can be assured of one 
thing, at least, which is that the basis of our description of the 
physical world — what we described at the outset as "the par- 
ticulate view"— flnds some justiflcation over the entire range 
of our experience, from the nucleus to the cosmos. And the fact 
that this approach to the description of nature makes sense, while 
embracing a span of about 10 40 in distance and 10 80 in mass, is 
not merely aesthetically pleasing; it also suggests that something, 
at least, of the physical description we give. to the behavior of 
atoms will be found applicable to the behavior of galaxies, too. 
If we want to find a unifying theme for the study of nature, 
especially for the applications of classical mechanics, this par- 
ticulate view is a strong candidate. 

1-1 Make a tabulation of the orders of magnitude of diameter, 
volume, mass, and density for a wide selection of objects that you 
regard as being of physical importance — e.g., nucleus, cell, and star. 
For the diameters and masses, rcprcsent the data by labclcd points on 
a straight line marked off logarithmically in successive powers of 10. 
This should give you a useful overview of the scale of the universe. 

1-2 Estimate the number of atoms in: 

(a) The smallest speck of matter you can see with the naked eye. 

(b) The earth. 

38 A universe of partieles 

1-3 Calculate the approximate mass, in tons, of a teaspoonful of 
nuclear matter — closely packed nuclei or neutrons. 

1-4 Sir James Jeans once suggested that each time any one of us 
draws a breath, there is a good chance that this lungful of air contains 
at least onc molecule from the last breath of Julius Caesar. Make your 
own calculation to test this hypothesis. 

1-5 A vacuum pump evacuates a bottle to a pressure of 10~ 6 mm of 
mercury (about 10 -9 of atmospheric pressure). Estimate the magni- 
tudes of the following quantities: 

(a) The number of molecules per cubic centimeter. 

(b) The average distance between molecules. 

1-6 In a classic experiment, E. Rutherford and T. Royds [Phil. Mag., 
17, 281 (1909)] showed that the alpha particles emitted in radioactive 
decay are the nuclei of normal helium atoms. They did this by collecting 
the gas resulting from the decay and measuring its spectrum. They 
started with a source of the radioactive gas radon (itself a decay product 
of radium). The half-life of radon is 3.8 days; i.e., out of any given 
number of atoms present at any instant, half are left, and half have 
decayed, 3.8 days later. When the experiment started, the rate of alpha- 
particle emission by the radon was about 5 X 10 9 per second. Six 
days later, enough helium gas had been collected to display a complete 
helium spectrum when an electric discharge was passed through the 
tube. What volume of helium gas, as measured at STP, was collected 
in this experiment? [The number of surviving radioactive atoms as a 
function of time is given by the exponential decay law, N(t) = Noe-*'. 
The number of disintegrations per unit time at any instant is \dN/dt\ = 
\Noe- u . Given the value of the half-life, you can deduce the value of 
the constant, X.] 

1-7 The general expansion of the universe as described by Hubble's 
law [o{r) = ar] implies that the average amount of mass per unit 
volume in the universe should be decreasing by about 1 part in 10 17 
per second (see Hors d'oeuvres no. 29, p. 16). According to one theory 
(no longer so strongly held) this Ioss is being made up by the continuous 
creation of matter in space. 

(a) Calculate the approximate number of hydrogen atoms per 
cubic meter per year that would, if produced throughout the volume 
of the universe, bring in the necessary amount of new mass. 

(b) It has been hypothesized (by J. G. King) that the creation 
of new matter, if it occurs, might well take place, not uniformly 
throughout space, but at a rate proportional to the amount of old 
matter present within a given volume. On this hypothesis, calculate 
the number of hydrogen atoms equivalent to the new mass created 
per day in a vessel containing 5 kg of mercury. (J. G. King concluded 

39 Problcms 

on this basis that a test of the hypothesis was feasible.) Convert your 
result to an equivalent volume of hydrogen gas as measured at a pres- 
sure of 1 Torr (1 mm of mercury). 

1-8 Theodore Rosebury, in his book Life on Man (Viking, New York, 
1969), remarks that the total bulk of all the microorganisms that live 
on the surface of a human being (excluding a far larger quantity on the 
inner surfaces of the intestinal system) could easily be accommodated 
in the bottom of a thimble. If the mean radius of these microorganisms 
is taken to be 5 y. (1 n = 10 -6 m), what is the order of magnitude of 
the population of such organisms that each of us carries around all 
the time ? Compare the result with the total human population of the 

1-9 It seems probable that the planets were formed by condensation 
from a nebula, surrounding the sun, whose outer diameter corresponded 
roughly to the orbit of Pluto. 

(a) If this nebula were assumed to be in the form of a disk with a 
thickness equal to about one tenth of its radius, what would have 
been its mean density in kg/m 3 ? (Do not include the mass of the sun 
in the calculation.) 

(b) A better picture appears to be of a gas cloud whose thickness 
increases roughly in proportion to the radius. Suppose that Jupiter 
were formed from a ring-shaped portion of the cloud, extending radially 
for half the distance from the asteroid belt to the orbit of Saturn and 
with a thickness equal to this radial extension. What would have been 
the mean density of this portion of the nebula ? 

(In terms of the radius of the earth's orbit, the orbit of Pluto has a 
radius of about 40 units, the asteroid belt is at about 3 units, and the 
orbit of Saturn has a radius of about 9.5 units.) 

1-10 The core of a large globular cluster of stars may typically contain 
about 30,000 stars within a radius of about 5 light-years. 

(a) Estimate the ratio of the mean separation of stars to the 
stellar diameter in such a core. 

(b) At approximately what degree of vacuum would the same 
ratio of separation to particle diameter be obtained for the molecules 
of a gas? 

40 A universe of particles 

/ do not define time, space, place and motion, since they are 
well known to all. 

newton, Principia (1686) 

Space, time, 
and motion 


you are undoubtedly familiar with motion in all kinds of mani- 
festations, but what would you say if you were asked to define it? 
The chances are that you would find yourself formulating a 
statement in which the phrase "a change of position with time," 
or something equivalent to that, expressed the central thought. 
For it seems that our ability to give any precise account of motion 
depends in an essential way on the use of the separate concepts 
of space and time. We say that an object is moving if it occupies 
different positions at different instants, and any stroboscopic 
photograph, such as that shown in Fig. 2-1, gives vivid expression 
to this mental picture. 

Ali of us grow up to be good Newtonians in the sense that 
our intuitive ideas about space and time are closely in harmony 
with those of Newton himself. The following paragraphs are a 
deliberate attempt to express these ideas in simple terms. The 
description may appear natural and plausible, but it embodies 
many notions which, on closer scrutiny, will turn out to be naive, 
and difficult or impossible to defend. So the account below (set 
apart with square brackets to emphasize its provisional status) 
should not be accepted at its face value but should be read with a 
healthy touch of skepticism. 

[Space, in Newton's view, is absolute, in the sense that it 
exists permanently and independently of whether there is any 
matter in the space or moving through it. To quote Newton's 
own words in the Principia: "Absolute space, in its own nature, 


Fig. 2-1 Slrobo- 
scopic photograph of 
a motion. {Front 
PSSC Physics, D. C. 
Healh, Lexington, 
Massachusetis, 1965.) 

without relation to anything external, remains always similar 
and immovable." 

[Space is thus a sort of stationary three-dimensional matrix 
into which one can place objects or through which objects can 
move without producing any interaction between the object and 
the space. Each object i n the universe exists at a particular point 
in space and time. An object in motion undergoes a continuous 
change of its position with time. And although it would not be 
practicable, one can imagine the charting of positions with the 
help of a vast network of meter sticks, laid out end to end in a 
three-dimensional, cubical array throughout space. One can 
conceive of extending such measurements to any point in the 
universe. In other words, the space is there, and we simply have 
a practical task of attaching markers to it. Moreover, our 
physical measurements agree with the theorems of Euclidean 
geometry, and space is thus assumed to be Euclidean. 

[Time, in Newton's view, is also absolute and flows on with- 

44 Space, time, and motion 

out regard to any physical object or event. Again quoting from 
the Principia: "AbsoLute, true, and mathematical time, of itself, 
and from its own nature, flows equably without relation to any- 
thing external, and by another name is called duration." The 
language is elegant but delightfully uninformative. As Newton 
said in the remark quoted at the beginning of this chapter, he 
did not attempt to define either space or time. 

[One can neither speed up time nor slow down its rate, and 
this flow of time exists uniformly throughout the universe. If we 
imagine the instant "'now" as it occurs simultaneously on every 
planet and star in the universe, and an hour later mark the end 
of this 60-minute interval, we assume that such a time interval 
has been identical for every object in the universe, as could (in 
principle) be verified by observations of physical, chemical, or 
biological processes at various locations. As an aid to measuring 
time intervals, it would be possible, in principle, to place identical 
clocks at each intersection of a meter-stick framework and to 
synchronize these clocks so that they indicate the same time at a 
common, simultaneous instant. Being identical clocks, they 
would thereafter correctly mark off the flow of absolute time and 
remain synchronized with each other. 

[Space and time, although completely independent of each 
other, are in a sense interrelated insofar as we find it impossible 
to conceive of objects existing in space for no time at all, or 
existing for a finite time interval but "nowhere" in space. Both 
space and time are assumed to be infinitely divisible — to have no 
ultimate structure.] 

The preceding five paragraphs describe in everyday language 
some commonsense notions about the nature of space and time. 
Embedded in these notions are many assumptions that we adopt, 
either knowingly or unconsciously, in developing our picture of 
the universe. It is fascinating therefore that, however intuitively 
correct they seem, many of these ideas have consequences that 
are inconsistent with experience. This first became apparent 
(as we mentioned in the Prologue) in connection with motions 
at very high speeds, approaching or equaling the speed of light, 
and with the phenomena of electromagnetism ; and it was Einstein, 
in his development of special relativity theory, who exposed 
some of the most important limitations of classical ideas, in- 
cluding Newton's own ideas about relativity, and then showed 
how they needed to be modified, especially with regard to the 
concept of time. 

45 What is motion '? 

The crux of the matter is that it is one thing to have abstract 
concepts of absolute space and time, and it is another thing to 
have a way of describing the actual motion of an object in terms 
of measured changes of position during measured intervals of 
time. Newton himself understood this very well, at least as far 
as spatial measurements were concerned. Thus in the Principia 
we find him remarking: "But because the parts of space cannot 
be seen, or distinguished from one another by our senses, there- 
fore in their stead we use sensible [i.e., observable] measures 
of them . . . And so, instead of absolute places and motions, we 
use relative ones . . . For it may be that there is no body really at 
rest, to which the places and measures of others may be re- 
ferred." If there is any knowledge to be gained about absolute 
space, it can only be by inference from these relative measure- 
ments. Thus our attention turns to the only basis we have for 
describing motion — observation of what a given object does in 
relation to other objects. 


If you should hear somebody say "That car is moving," you 
would be quite certain that what is being described is a change 
of position of the car with respect to the earth's surface and any 
buildings and the like that may be nearby. Anybody who an- 
nounced "There is relative motion between that car and the 
earth" would be rightly regarded as a tiresome pedant. But this 
does not alter the fact that it takes the pedantic statement to 
express the true content of the colloquial one. We accept the 
local surroundings — a collection of objects attached to the earth 
and therefore at rest relative to one another— as defining a frame 
ofreference with respect to which the changes of position of other 
objects can be observed and measured. 

It is clear that the choice of a particular frame of reference 
to which to refer the motion of an object is entirely a matter 
of taste and convenience, but it is often advantageous to use a 
reference frame in which the description of the motion is simplest. 
A ship, for example, is for many purposes a self-contained world 
within which the position or path of any person is most efficiently 
described in terms of three perpendicular axes based on the 
directions fore and aft, port and starboard, and up and down 
(according to deck number). The uniform motion of the ship itself 

46 Space, time, and motion 

with respect to a frame of reference attached to the earth may be 
unnoticed or even ignored by the passengers, as long as they can 
rely on the navigation officers. 

Is the earth itself at rest? We would not say so. We have 
become accustomed to the fact that the earth, like the other 
planets, is continually changing its position with respect to a 
greater frame of reference represented by the stars. And since 
the stars constitute an almost completely unchanging array of 

Fig. 2-2 Apparent 
circular molions of 
the stars. (Carillon 
Tower of Wellesley 
College, Wellesley, 
Mass., from J. C. 
Duncan, Astronomy, 
5th edilion, Harper 
&Row,J954,p. 19.) 




' ' JK 

f' ] 


'■ - i 
T , 


f f 'f f 



47 Frames of reference 

reference points in the sky, we regard the totality of them as 
representing a fixed frame of reference, within which the earth 
both rotates and moves bodily. It remains true, however, that 
our primary data are only of relatioe positions and displacements; 
the belief that it makes more sense to assume that the earth is 
really rotating on its axis once every 24 hours, rather than that 
the system of stars is going around us, is one that cannot be 
justified by primary observations alone (see Fig. 2-2). With our 
present knowledge of the great masses and enormous numbers of 
the stars, it does, to be sure, simply seem more reasonable to 
attribute the motion to our puny earth. But it would be hard to 
elevate that subjective judgment into a physical law. 

Later we shall see that there are powerful theoretical reasons 
for preferring some reference frames to others. The "best" 
choice of reference frame becomes ultimately a question of 
dynamics — i.e., dependent on the actual laws of motion and 
force. But the choice of a particular reference frame is often 
made without regard to the dynamics, and for the present we 
shall just concern ourselves with the purely kinematic problems 
of analyzing positions and motions with respect to any given 


A frame of reference, as we have said, is defined by some array 
of physical objects that remain at rest relative to one another. 
Within any such frame, we make measurements of position and 
displacement by setting up a coordinate system of some kind. In 
doing this we have a free choice of origin and of the kind of 
coordinate system that is best suited to the purpose at hand. 
Since the space of our experience has three dimensions, we must 
in general specify three separate quantities in order to fix uniquely 
the position of a point. However, most of the problems that we 
shall consider will be of motion confined to a single plane, so let 
us first consider the specification of positions and displacements 
in two dimensions only. 

As you are doubtless well aware, the position of a point 
in a plane is most often designated with respect to two mutually 
perpendicular straight lines, which we call the x and y axes of a 
coordinate system, intersecting at an origin O. The position 
of the point P [Fig. 2-3(a)] relative to O is then described by a 
position vector r, as shown, characterized by a specific length and 

48 Space, time, and motion 

Fig. 2-3 (a) Square 
grid; the basis of 
Carlesian coordinates 
in a plane. (b) Plane 
polar coordinate grid. 

a specific direction. Using our perpendicular axes, we can 
uniquely define r by the pair of rectangular (Cartesian) co- 
ordinates (x, y), which are projections of r onto the x and y 
axes, respectively. However, another important way of specify- 
ing r is in terms of polar coordinates (r, 0), as shown in Fig. 
2-3(b). Here r is the distance of P from O and d is the angle that 
r makes with the positive x axis, as measured in a counterclock- 
wise (conventionally positive) direction. The two schemes of 
designating the position of P are related as follows: 

(In two dimcnsions) 

r 2 = x 2 + y 2 

tan = - 


x = r cos d 

y = 

= r sin 


Figure 2-4 shows examples of the use of these coordinate systems. 
We shall on various occasions be making use of unit vectors 
that represent displacements of unit length along the basic co- 
ordinate directions. In the rectangular (Cartesian) system we 
shall denote the unit vectors in the x and y directions by i and j, 
respectively. The position veetor r can be written as the sum of its 
two veetor components: 

(In two dimensions) r = xi + y\ 


In the polar coordinate system, we shall use the symbol e r to 
denote a unit veetor in the direction of increasing r at constant 
6 and the symbol e e to denote a unit veetor at right angles to r 
in the direction of increasing 9. (The use of the symbol e for this 
purpose comes from the German word for unit, which is 

49 Coordinate systems 

/*>" '""'V 


y>«iui.i«ns< * 


fig. 2-4 (a) Example of Cariesian coordinales in use — a portion of mid- 
town Manhattan, New York City. (b) Example of plane polar coordinales in 
use— a radar scopeface with afew incipient thunderslorms (June 3, 1970). 
North is shown as O" azimuth. The heavy circles ofr = const are at 100 km, 
200 km; the lighter circles are spaced by 25 km. (Photograph courtesy of 
Department of Meteorology, M.l.T.) 

"Einheit.") In this polar-coordinate system, the vector r is simply 
equal to re r , and one might wonder why the unit vector e« is 
introduced at all. As we shall see, however, it becomes very 
important as soon as we consider motions rather than static 
displacements, for motions will often have a component per- 
pendicular to r. 

Although the above coordinate schemes are the most familiar 
ones — and are the only ones we shall be using in this book for 
two-dimensional problems — it is worth noting that any mapping 
of the surface that uniquely fixes the position of a point is a 
possible system. Figure 2-5 shows two examples — one a non- 
orthogonal system based on straight axes, and the other an 
orthogonal system based on two sets of intersecting curves. Such 
systems are introduced to capitalize on the kinds of symmetry 
that particular physical systems may possess. 

50 Spacc, time, and motion 

Fig. 2-5 (a) Oblique coordinate system, ofthe kind 
Ihal is freguently used in Minkowski diagrams (space- 
time diagrams) in special relativity. (b) Orthogonal 
curvilinear coordinate system, made o/ intersecting sets of 
confocal ellipses and hyperbolas. 

If it is necessary to specify all three of the spatial coordinates 
of a point, the most generally useful coordinate systems are the 
three-dimensional rectangular (Cartesian) coordinates (x, y, z), 
and spherical polar coordinates (r, 6, <p). These are both illus- 
trated in Fig. 2-6(a). The Cartesian system is almost always 
chosen to be right-handed, by which we mean that the positive z 
direction is chosen so that, looking upward along it, the process 
of rotating from the positive x direction toward the positive y 
direction corresponds to that of a right-handed screw. It then 
follows that the cyclic permutations of this operation are also 
right-handed — from -\-y to +z, looking along +x, and from 
+z to +x, looking along +y. You may note that the two- 
dimensional coordinate system, as shown in Fig. 2-3(a), would 
on this convention bc associated with a positive z axis sticking 
up toward you out of the plane of the paper. Introducing a unit 
vector k in the +z direction, analogous to the i and j of Eq. (2-2), 
we can write the vector r as the sum of its three Cartesian vector 

r = xi + yi + zk 

51 Coordinate systems 


Fig. 2-6 (a) Coordinates ofa poinl in three dimensions, 
showing both spherical polar and right-handed Carlesian 
coordinates. (6) Point located by angular coordinates 
(lalitude and longitude) on a sphere, and the unit vectors 
ofa local Carlesian coordinate system at the point in 

The description of the position or displacement in spherical 
polar coordinates makes use of one distance and two angles. 
(Notice that three dimensions requires three independent co- 
ordinates, whatever particular form they may take.) The distance 
is, as with plane polar coordinates, the distance r from the chosen 
origin. One of the angles [the one shown as in Fig. 2-6(a)] is 
simply the angle between the vector r and the positive z axis; 
it is known as the polar angle. The other angle represents the 
angle between the zx plane and the plane defined by the z axis 
and r. It can be found by drawing a perpendicular PN from the 
end point P of r onto the xy plane and measuring the angle be- 
tween the positive x axis and the projection ON. This angle (p) 
is called the azimuth. The geometry of the figure shows that the 
rectangular and spherical polar coordinates are related as follows: 

x = r sin cos tp 
y = r sin sin <p 
z = r cos 


If we set = tt/2, we make z = and so get back to the two- 

52 Space, time, and motion 

dimensional world of the xy plane. The first two equations of 
(2-4) then give us 

x = r cos ¥> 
y = r sin v? 

It is very unfortunate that a long-established tradition uses the 
symbol d, as we ourselves did earlier, to denote the angle between 
the vector r and the x axis in this special two-dimensional case. 
This need not become a cause for confusion, but one does need 
to be on the alert for the inconsistency of these conventions. 

We have all grown up with one important use of spherical 
polar coordinates, the mapping of the earth's surface. This is 
indicated in Fig. 2-6(b). The longitude of a given point is just 
the angle ip, and the latitude is an angle, X, equal to jr/2 — 6. 
(This entails calling north latitudes positive and south latitudes 
negative.) At any given point on the earth's surface a set of three 
mutually orthogonal unit vectors defines for us a local coordinate 
system; the unit vector e r points vertically upward, the vector e e 
points due south, parallel to the surface, and the third unit 
vector, e^,, points due east, also parallel to the surface. As with 
the plane polar coordinates, the vector r is given simply by re r . 


Suppose we were at a point P\ on a flat horizontal plane [Fig. 
2-7 (a)] and wished to go to another point P g. Imagine that we 
chose to make the trip by moving only east and north (represented 
by +x and +y in the figure). We know there are two particularly 

Fig. 2-7 (a) Suc- 
cessiue displacements 
on a plane; the final 
position is independen! 
of the order in which 
the displacements are 
made. {b) Addition 
of secerat displace- 
ment vectors in a 

53 Combination of vector displacements 


Fig. 2-8 Seatar 
multiples of a given 
veetor r, including 
negative multiples. 




straightforward ways of doing this: (1) travel a certain distance 
s z due cast and then a certain distance s u due north, or (2) travel 
s u due north, followed by s x due east. The order in which we 
take these two component displacements does not matter; we 
rcach the same point P 2 in either casc. Our representation of the 
veetor r in Eq. (2-2) as the sum of the individual veetors xi and 
yj is an example of such a combination. This simple and familiar 
property of linear displacements exemplifies an essential feature 
of all those quantities we call veetors and is not confined to 
combinations at right anglcs. Thus, for example, in Fig. 2-7(b) 
we illustrate how three veetor displacements, A, B, and C, placed 
head to tail, can be combined into a single veetor displacement S 
drawn from the original starting point to the final end point. 
This is what we mean by adding the veetors A, B, and C. The 
order in which veetors are added is of no consequence; thus 
successive displacements of an object can be combined according 
to the veetor addition law, without regard to the sequence in 
which the displacements are made. What we mean by a veetor 
quantity, in general, is that it is a direeted quantity obeying the 
same laws of combination as positional displacements. 

We shall often be concerned with forming a numerical 
multiple of a given veetor. A positive multiplier, n, means that 
we changc the length of the veetor by the faetor n without chang- 
ing its direetion. The negative of a veetor (multiplication by — 1) 
is defined to mean a veetor of equal magnitude but in the opposite 
direetion, so that added to the original veetor it gives zero. A 
negative multiplier, —n, then defines a veetor reversed in diree- 
tion and changed in length by the faetor n. These operations are 
illustrated in Fig. 2-8. 

Subtracting one veetor from another is accomplished by 
noting that subtraetion basically involves the addition of a nega- 
tive quantity. Thus if veetor B is to be subtraeted from veetor A, 
we form the veetor —B and add it to A: 

A - B = A I (-B) 

54 Space, time, and motion 

Fig. 2-9 Addilion 
and subtraction of 
Iwo given vectors. 
Note that the magni- 
tude ofthe vector 
difference may be {as 
here) larger than the 

Fig. 2-10 Construc- 
tion of the relative 
position vector ofone 
point (i> 2 ) with re- 
spect to another point 


In Fig. 2-9 we show both the sum and the difference of two given 
veetors. We have deliberately chosen the direetions of A and B 
to be such that the vector A — B is longer than the vector A + B; 
this will help to emphasize the faet that vector combination is 
something rather different from simple arithmetical combination. 
The evaluation of the vector distance from a point P^ to a 
point P 2 , when originally the positions of these points are given 
separately with respect to an origin O [see Fig. (2-10)], is a 
direct application of vector subtraction. The position of P 2 
relative to P\ is given by the vector r 12 such that 

ri2 = r2 — ri 

(The subseript "12" is to be read as "one-two" and is a common 
notation in the deseription of two-particle systems.) Similarly, 
the position of P! relative to P 2 is given by the vector r 2 i = 
r, — r 2 . Clearlyr 2 i = — r 12 . 

55 Combination of vector displacements 

Fig. 2-11 (a) Com- 
ponents of a given 
vector in two different 
rectangular coordi- 
nate systems related 
by an angular dis- 
placemenl 9 in the 
xy plane. (b) Com- 
ponents of a given 
vector in a rectangu- 
lar coordinate system 
and in an obligue co- 
ordinate system. 


In discussing the description of a given vector in terms of its 
components, we have indicated that this is a process that can be 
operated in either direction. There is the analysis (resolution) 
of the vector into its components in a given coordinate system, 
or there is the synthesis (addition) of the vector components to 
reconstitute the original vector. There is, however, an important 
difference between thcse two operations. The vector sum of the 
components is unique— it is the particular vector that we are 
considering — but the process of resolving the vector into com- 
ponents can be done in an infinity of ways, depending on the 
choice of coordinate system. 

If we are using a coordinate system based on orthogonal 
axes (whether Cartcsian or polar or anything else), the com- 
ponents of the vector are easily found by multiplying the length 
of the vector by the cosine of the angle that the vector makes 
with cach of the coordinate axes in turn. Thus, for example, if 
we had a vector A confined to the xy plane [see Fig. 2-1 l(a)] its 
components in the xy coordinate system are given by 

A x = Acosa A„ = /4cos<3 

We know that /3 = (tt/2) - «> but by introducing the two 
separate angles we have a formalism that lends itself to being 

'U is hoped that this seetion may be helpful in a general way, but the only 
fcaturc that will be specifically needed later is the scalar produet of two arbi- 
trary veetors. 

56 Space, (ime, and motion 

extended to the case of three dimensions, making use of the three 
separate angles a, 0, and T that the vector makes with the three 
axes. In this more general case there is no simple connection 
between the angles themselves, but we have the relationship 

cos 2 a + cos 2 /3 + cos 2 7 = 1 

Our two-dimensional case corresponds to putting 7 = w/2. 

The total vector A in Fig. 2- 11 (a) can of course be written 

A = AJ + A v \ 

= {A cos d)\ + (A cos ;8)j 

A very convenient way of expressing such results is made possible 
by introducing what is called the scalar product of two vectors. 
This is defined in general in the following way: If the angle be- 
tween any two vectors, A and B, is 0, then the scalar product, S, 
is equal to the product of the lengths of the two vectors and the 
cosine of the angle d. This product is also called the dot product 
because it is conventionally written as A • B. Thus we have 

scalar product (S) = A ■ B = AB cos d 

If for the vector B we now choose one or other of the unit vectors 
of an orthogonal coordinate system, the scalar product of A 
with the unit vector is just the component of A along the direction 
characterized by the unit vector: 

A x = A ■ i A y = A • j 

Thus the vector A can be written as follows: 

A = (A-i)i + (A-j)j 

This result can, in fact, be developed directly from the basic 
statement that A can be written as a vector sum of components 
along x-and y: 

A = A x \ + Ay\ 

Forming the scalar product of both sides of this equation with 
the unit vector i, we have 

A • i = A x (i ■ i) + A„(i ■ i) 

Now (i • i) = 1 and (j • i) = 0, because these vectors are all of 
unit length and the values of are and t/2, respectively. Thus 

57 The resolution of vectors 

we have a more or less automatic procedure for selecting out 
and evaluating each component in turn. 

If one were to take this no further, the above development 
would seem perhaps pointlessly complicated. Its value becomes 
more apparent if one is interested in relating the components of a 
given vector in different coordinate systems. Consider, for 
example, the second set of axes (x\ y') shown in Fig. 2-1 1 (a) ; 
they are obtained by a positive (counterclockwise) rotation from 
the original (x,y) system. The vector A then has two equally 
valid representations: 

A - AJL + A„j = AJV + A u '¥ 

If we want to find A» in terms of A x and A v , we just form the 
scalar product with i' throughout. This gives us 

A,' = AS • i') + A„(i ■ i') 

Looking at Fig. 2-1 l(a), we see the following relationships: 

i • i' = cos 6 j • i' = cos f | - 6 j = sin 


A z ' = A z cos + A„ sin 

A y ' = AA-f) + AJl'f) 

= /*xCOs(;; + B ) + /*„COS0 


A y ' = -A x sin d + A y cos 6 

This procedure avoids the need for tiresome and sometimes 
awkward considerations of geometrical projections of the vector 
A onto various axes of coordinates. 

The same approach can be useful if a vector is to be resolved 
into nonorthogonal components. Consider, for example, the 
situation shown in Fig. 2-1 1 (b). The axes are the lines Osi and 
Os 2 , and the components of the vector A in this system are OE 
and OF. If we denote unit veetors along the coordinate direetions 
by ei and e 2 , we havc 

58 Space, timc, and motion 

A = siei + S2*2 = A z i + A„\ 

If we form the scalar product throughout with, let us say, ei, 
we havc 

s\ + J2(e2 • ei) = A x (i ■ ei) + /i„(j • ci) 

Given a knowledge of the angles between the various axes, this 
is a linear equation involving the two unknowns Si and s 2 . A 
second equation can be obtained by forming the scalar product 
throughout with e 2 instead of ei, and it then becomes possible 
to solve for Si and s 2 separately. It is important, in this case, 
to recognize that the base vectors e! and e 2 are no longer or- 
thogonal, so that the scalar product (e, • e 2 ) does not vanish. 
The use of oblique coordinate systems of this kind is, however, 
rather special, and as a rule the resolution of a vector along the 
three independent directions of an orthogonal coordinate system 
is the reasonable and useful thing to do. 


You may be tempted to think that the basic law of vector addi- 
tion, and the fact that the final result is independent of the order 
in which the combining vectors are taken, is more or less obvious. 
Let us therefore point out that it dcpends crucially on having 
our space obey the rules of Euclidean geometry. If we are dealing 
with displacements confined to a two-dimensional world as 
represented by a surface, it is essential that this surface be flat. 
This is not just a pedantic consideration, because one of our 
most important two-dimensional reference frames — the earth's 
surface — is curved. As long as displacements are small compared 
to the radius of the curvature, our surface is for practical pur- 
poses flat, our observations conform to Euclidean plane geometry, 
and all is well. But if the displacements along the surface are 
sufliciently great, this idcalization cannot be used. For cxample, 
a displacement 1000 miles eastward from a point on the equator, 
followed by a displacement 1000 miles northward, does nol 
bring one to the same placc as two equivalent displacements 
(i.e., again on grcat circles intersecting at right angles) taken in 

■This scction can be omitted without loss of continuity. 

59 Vector addition and the properties of space 

Fig. 2-12 Successiue 
displacements on a 
sphere are not com- 
mutative if the sizes 
of the displacements 
are not small com- 
pared to the radius of 
the sphere. 

the opposite order; it misses by about 40 miles! (See Fig. 2-12.) 
This means, in effect, that the correctness of vector addition is a 
matter for experiment and that tests for departures from it can 
be used to make deductions about the geometrical properties 
of the space in which we operate. For example, we could take 
the results of sensitive measurements on the difference between 
the two possible ways of making two successive displacements 
on a sphere and use the data to deduce the radius of the sphere. 
When we acknowledge that the space of our ordinary ex- 
perience is really three-dimensional, then, of course, we look at 
the foregoing analysis from a different point of view. We recog- 
nize that displacements on the surface of a sphere can actually 
be scen as displacements in a three-dimensional world that obeys 
Euclidean geometry rather than in a merely two-dimensional 
world that appears, within itself, to be non-Euclidean. But at 
this point a very intercsting speculation suggests itself: Can we 
say that our space of three dimensions is rigorously Euclidean? 
Is it possible that the result of adding displacements along the 
three basic coordinate dircctions is dependent to some minute 
extent on the order of addition? If this were discovered to be 
the case, then we might proceed by analogy and introduce a 
fourth spatial dimension, associated with some characteristic 
radius of curvature, such that our non-Euclidean space of three 
dimensions could be described as Euclidean in a "hyperspace" 
of four dimensions. 

60 Space, tirae, and motion 


Some distinguishcd scientists, beginning with the great Kari 
Friedrich Gauss ("the Prince of mathematicians") ' have sought 
by direct observation to test the validity of Euclidean geometry, 
by measuring whether the angles of a closed triangle add up to 
exactly 180°. (For example, in the non-Euclidean space repre- 
sented by the surface of a sphere, the angles of a triangle add up 
to more than 180°.) No departure from a Euclidean character for 
three-dimensional space has been detected through such observa- 
tions. The concept that space may, however, be "curved," and 
that this curvature might be revealed if one could only carry out 
observations over sufficiently great distances, occupies an im- 
portant place in thcoretical cosmology. 

You may have read about the curvature of space in another 
connection— Einstein's theory of gravitation— which describes 
local gravitational effects in terms of a modification of geometry in 
the space surrounding a massive object such as the sun. We shall 
not pursue this topic here, although we shall touch on it very 
briefly at the end of our account of gravitation in general 
(Chapter 8). 

In the preceding sections we have developed the basic analysis 
of spatial displacements. To describe motion we must link such 
displacements to the time intervals during which they occur. 
Before considering this as a quantitative problem, let us very 
briefly supplement the remarks that we made at the beginning 
of the chapter concerning the actual nature of time. This is, of 
course, a hugc subject that has engaged the thoughts and specula- 
tions of men— philosophers, scientists, and humanists alike— 
throughout history, and continues to do so. We shall not presume 
to do more than to cxamine one or two aspects of the problem 
from the standpoint of physical seienec. 

The sense of the passage of time is deeply embedded in 
every one of us. We know, in some elemental sense, what time is. 

'Kari Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855) was one of the outstanding mathema- 
ticians of all time. In the originality and range of his work he has never been 
surpassed, and probably never equaled. He delved deeply into astronomy 
and geodesy and was perhaps the first to recognize the possibility of a non- 
Euclidean geometry for space. See E. T. Bell's essay about him in The World 
of Mathemalics (J. R. Newman, ed.), Simon and Schuster, New York, 1956. 

61 Time 

But can we say what it is? The distinguished Dutch physicist 
H. A. Kramers once remarked: "My own pet notion is that in 
the world of human thought gencrally, and in physical science 
particularly, the most important and most fruitful concepts are 
those to which it is impossible to attach a well-defined meaning." ' 
To nothing, perhaps, does this apply more cogently than to time. 
Nevertheless, if one tries to analyze the problem, one can perhaps 
begin to see that it is not entirely elusive. Even though a defini- 
tion of time may be hard to come by, one can recognize that our 
concept of the passage of time is tied very directly to the fact 
that things change. In particular we are aware of certain recurrent 
events or situations — the beats of our pulse, the daily passage 
of the sun, the seasons, and so on. We almost subconsciously 
treat these as though they are markers on some continuous line 
that already exists— rather like milestones along a road. But 
all we have in terms of direct knowledge is the set of markers; 
the rest is an intellectual construction. Thus, although it may 
be valuable to have an abstract concept of time continuously 
flowing, our first-hand experience is only the observed behavior 
of a device called "a clock." In order to assign a quantitative 
measure to the duration of some process or the interval between 
two events, we simply associatc the beginning and end points 
with readings on a clock. It is not essential that the clock make 
use of a recurrent phenomenon — one need only consider ancient 
devices such as water clocks and graduated candles, or modern 
parallels such as continuously weakening radioactive sources — 
but we do ask that it provide us with a means of marking off 
successive intervals in some recognizable way, and most such 
devices do, in fact, make use of repetitive phenomena of some 

How do we know that the successive time intervals defined 
by our chosen clock are truly cqual? The fact is that we don't; 
it is ultimately a matter of faith. No clock is perfect, but we 
have learned to recognize that some clocks are better than 
others — better in the sense that the segments into which they 
divide our experience are more nearly equal. A doctor observes 
his wristwatch and tells us that our pulse is irregular; the wrist- 
watch, however, is found to be itself irregular when compared 

'Physical Sciences and Human Values (a symposium), Princeton University 
Press, Princeton, N. J., 1947. 

62 Space, time, and motion 

more critically against a crystal-controlled oscillator; the oscil- 
lator wandcrs noticeably when checked against a clock based on 
atomic vibrations. Whether or not the uniform flow of time, as 
an ultimate abstraction, has any physical meaning, the remarkable 
fact is that we approach the measurement of time as if this steady 
flow existed. We evaluate the behavior of any given clock by 
observing its consistency and reproducibility, so that in using it 
we can quote its measure of a time or a time interval with a 
specified range of possible error. And then, when we proceed 
from individual measurements to general equations involving 
time, we introduce the symbol t and treat r as a continuous 
variable in the mathematical sense. 


Most of our discussion of motion will be in terms of unspecified 
positions and times, represented symbolically by r, /, and so on. 
It should never be forgotten, however, that the description of 
actual motions involves the numerical measures of such quan- 
tities and the use of universally accepted units and standards. 
Our choice of acceptable standards of both distance and time is 
the result of a continuing search for the highest degree of con- 
sistency and reproducibility in such measurements. The evolution 
and present state of this process is briefly summarized below. 


The current Standard of length — the meter — was introduced, 
along with the rcst of the metric system, in the drive for scientific 
and cultural order that developed in France in the latter half 
of the 18th century. The meter was originally intended to repre- 
sent 1 ten-millionth (10 -7 ) of the distance from pole to equator 
of the earth along a meridian of longitude. But it proved im- 
possible to construct any sufficiently precise Standard on the 
basis of this definition, and the meter was then defined as the 
length of a particular metal bar kept in Sevres, near Paris, and 
finally as a multiple of the wavelength of a charaeteristie spectral 
line — most recently (since 1960) as being a distance equal to 
1,650,763.73 wavelengths of orange-red light from the isotopc 
krypton 86. 

Although the use of the extremely small units of length 

63 Units and standards of length and time 

represented by light waves means that the meter can be defined 
with immense precision — to 1 part in 10 8 or better — there is the 
disadvantage that an object as long as a meter cannot be directly 
measured, in a one-step process, in terms of light waves from 
ordinary sources. The reason is that the measurements depend 
on observing optical interference effects that begin to wash out 
if the distance in question becomes more than about 1 ft. The 
development of lasers has completely transformed this situation, 
and interference effects have been observed up to path lengths 
of over 100 m. It thus seems quite probable that the meter will 
at some future date be defined in terms of an optical wavelength 
obtainable from a laser source, perhaps one of the characteristic 
spectral lines of neon in a helium-neon laser. 


The process of defining a Standard of time involves a feature that 
sets it significantly apart from the establishment of a Standard 
of length. This is that, as Allen Astin has remarked: "We cannot 
choose a particular sample of time and keep it on hand for 
reference." 1 We depend upon identifying some recurring phe- 
nomenon and assumirrg that it always supplies us with time 
intervals of the same length. 

The Standard of time — the second — was originally based on 
the assumed constancy of the earth's rotation. It was first defined 
as being equal to 1/86,400 of a mean solar day — i.e., the average, 
over 1 year, ol the time from noon to noon or midnight to mid- 
night at a given placc on the earth's surfacc. This is an awkward 
definition, because the length of the day, as measured from noon 
to noon, is not a constant; it varies because the earth's speed 
and its distance from the sun are continuously changing during 
one complete orbit. A logically more satisfaetory definition of 
the second can be based on the sidereal day— the time for any 
given star to return to the same position overhead. If the earth's 
rotation were truly uniform, the length of every sidereal day 
would be the same. 

In faet, it has gradually come to be rccognized, thanks to 

'Allen V. Astin, "Standards of Measurement," Sci. Am., 218 (6), 50 (1968). 
Some people would, however, argue that even a solid, tangible bar as a length 
Standard is equally vulnerable on philosophical and logical grounds. 

64 Space, time, and motion 

the extraordinary precision of astronomical raeasurements ex- 
tended over thousands of years, that neither the length of the 
solar year nor the earth's rate of rotation on its axis is exactly 
constant, the latter in particular being subject to minute but 
abrupt variations. The year has been found to be lengthening 
at the rate of about £ sec per century, so that in 1956 the second 
was redefined as being equal to 1/31,556,925.9747 of the tropical 
year 1900. (A tropical year is defined as the interval of time 
between two successive passages of the sun through the vernal 
equinox. We shall not attempt here to deseribe just how one 
"latehes on" to a second of the year 1900 for calibration pur- 
poses.) It should be recognized that the variations being dis- 
cussed here are fantastically small, as is implied by the ability 
to define the year in terms of the second to 12 significant figures. 

Finally, in 1967, the use of atomic vibrations to specify a 
time Standard was adopted by international agreement ; it defines 
the second as corresponding to 9,192,631,770 eyeles of vibration 
in an atomic clock controlled by one of the charaeteristie fre- 
quencies associated with atoms of the isotope cesium 133. 

Quite apart from the practical challenge of defining units 
and standards of time with the maximum attainable precision, 
there are some questions of fundamental interest involved. Does 
time as defined by celestial motions, controlled by gravitation, 
keep step at all epochs with time as defined by atomic vibrations, 
controlled by electric forees within the atom? It was suggested 
in 1938 by P. A. M. Dirac 1 that the constant of universal gravita- 
tion might be slowly changing with time — with a "time constant" 
on the order of the age of the universe itself, i.e., about 10 10 
years. If this were true, our astronomical and atomic standards 
would, in the long run, be found to reveal diserepancies. 

This matter of units and standards is one that most of us 
do not bother our heads with. We think we know well enough 
what is meant by a meter and a second; and a ruler or a wateh 
is usually near at hand. But perhaps the above diseussion may 
help to suggest that the detailed story of how these basic mea- 
sures are defined, redefined, and made more and more precise 
is a quitc faseinating business — especially, perhaps, for time, to 

■Dirac, a British theorelical physicist, was one of the leaders in the develop- 
ment of quantum thcory around 1926-1930. He was awarded the Nobel 
prize for this work. 

65 Units and standards of length and time 

which astronomical observations over the centuries have con- 
tributed data of a refinement that almost passes belief. ' 


The primary data in the description of any motion will be a set 
of associated measures of position and time. Such data might, 
for example, be a tabulation i n an astronomer's logbook, or a 
single stroboscopic photograph such as Fig. 2—1. In general 
the statement of position at any instant will require the use of 
three coordinates, corresponding to the three independcnt di- 
mensions of space. I n many circumstances, however, the motion 
may be confined to a planc, requiring two coordinates only, or 
to a single line, so that a single positional coordinate sumces. 
In this last case, and especially if the motion is along a straight 
line, it is often extremely convenient to display the motion in 

Fig. 2-13 Example 
of a space-lime graph 
for a one-dimen- 
sional motion. (From 
the PSSCfilm, 
"Straight Line Kine- 
matics," by E. M. 
Hafner, Edueation 
Deiselopment Center 
Film Studio, Newton, 
Mass., 1959.) 


'For further reading see, for instance, An Introduction to the Physics of Mass, 
Length and Time, by N. Fealher, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 
1959. On the matler of time in parlicular, which probably holds the greatest 
interest, the following books and articles are recommended: J. T. Fraser (ed.), 
The Voices ofTime, Gcorgc Braziller, New York, 1966; T. Gold and D. L. 
Schumacher (eds.), The Nature of Time, Corncll University Press, Ithaca, 
N. Y., 1967; G. M. Clemence, "Siandards ofTime and Frequency," Science, 
123, 567 (1956); Lee Coe, "The Nature of Time," Am. J. Phys., 37, 810 
(1969); Richard Schlegel, Time and the Physical World, Dover, New York, 

66 Space, time, and motion 


terms of a space-time graph in which, as a rule, thc time is re- 
garded as an independent variable, plotted along the abscissa, 
and the position is plotted along the ordinate. Figurc 2-13 shows 
such a graph. It has the great merit that it conveys directly, in a 
way that a numerical table cannot, a complete picture of a given 
motion. One can immcdiately identify points of maximum and 
minimum distance from the origin, regions of time in which the 
motion temporarily ccases altogether, and so on. ' 

The central concept in the quantitative description of motion is 
that of velocity. It is a vcctor. The quantitative measure of 
velocity, in the case of one-dimensional motion, is one of the 
first pieces of information that we can extract from a space-time 
graph such as Fig. 2-13. Our way of designating velocities — 
miles per hour, meters per second, and so on — is a constant 
reminder of thc fact that velocity is a deriued quantity, based on 
these separatc mcasures of spacc and time. Has it ever struck 
you that although physicists have invcntcd names for the units 
of measurcment of all sorts of physical quantitics, they have 
never introduced special names for units of velocity? (Seafaring 
men have done it, though, with their unit the knot, equal to 1 
nautical mile per hour.) In nature itself, things seem to be quite 
otherwise, for although we have not as yet idcntified anything 
that is directly rccognizablc as a fundamental natural unit of 
length or time, we do find a fundamental unit of velocity — thc 
magnitude (c) of the velocity of light in empty space: 

c = (2.997925 ± 0.000001) X 10 8 m/sec 

It has become customary in high-energy partiele physics to 
express velocities as fraetions of c. And in a comparable way, 
in connection with high-speed (light, the Mach number is used 
to express the speed of an aireraft as a fraelion or multiple of 
the speed of sound in air. But this does not alter the fact that 

'Such graphical representations of correlated quantities often provide a much 
more immediale and vivid insight into a situalion ihan do numerical tab- 
ulations or algebraic formulas, and cven a rough graph, sketehed freehand, 
can be a great aid to thinking aboul a situalion. A facility in drawing and 
interpreling graphs as cxpressions of physical relalionships is well worth 

67 Velocity 

our basic description of velocities is in terms of the number of 
units of distance per unit of time. 

The measurement of a velocity requires at least two measure- 
ments of the position of an object and the two corresponding 
measurements of timc. Let us denote these measurements by 
(ri, Ij) and (r 2 , t 2 )- Using these we can deduce the magnitude 
and direction of what we can loosely call the average velocity 
between those points: 

_ T2—U 

Vav — 

t% — /l 

However, this average velocity is not, in most cases, a very 
interesting quantity. Sometimes we may find that a graph of s 
versus / (let us assume a onc-dimensional motion) is a straight 
linc, so that the value of v deduced from any two pairs of values 
s and t is the same. But there is a much more basic and general 
problem: What can we do about defining and evaluating the 
velocity at an arbitrary instant in a nonuniform motion such as 
that represented by Fig. 2-13? The next section is devoted to this 
question, which is of fundamental importance to the whole of the 
mathematical analysis of motion. 


Richard P. Feynman tells the story of the lady who is caught 
for speeding at 60 miles per hour and says to the police ofncer: 
"That's impossible, sir, I was traveling for only seven minutes." 1 
The lady's objection does not convince us (or the police omcer); 
we understand that what is at issue is not the persistence of a 
uniform motion for a long time but the property of the motion 
as measured over a time interval that might be arbitrarily short. 
In order to talk about this in specific terms, imagine that along- 
side a straight section of a road in each direction from a chosen 
point, P, we have placed a set of equally spaced poles, say at 

'This story, further embellished by Feynman with entertaining and instructive 
details, can be found in The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. I (R. P. 
Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, eds.), Addison-Wesley, Reading, 
Mass., 1963. These lectures, of wonderful freshness and originality, range 
over the whole of physics and provide rich and exciting fare for everyone, 
whether a beginner or a veteran in the subject. Feynman, one of the most 
outstanding physicists of our time, was awarded the Nobel prize in 1966 for 
his fundamental contributions to quantum field theory. 

68 Space, time, and motion 

Fig. 2-14 Arrange- 
menl for inferring the 
instantaneous velocity 
of a car as it passes 
the point P. 

5-meter intervals (see Fig. 2-14). On each pole is an electric 
clock with a sweep second hand. The clocks are synchronized 
and run continuously. A movie camera is placed opposite each 
pole, so as to photograph the pole, the clock face, and the road. 
A car comes along the road; the cameras are set running and the 
photographic records are developed. It is like the photofinish 
of a race. Each film will contain one frame in which, let us say, 
the front bumper of the car is more or less exactly in line with the 
pole. We now assemble the records. Take the data for the poles 
in pairs, equal distances before and after the central point P. 
For a given pair let the separation in distance be called As (a 
multiple of 10 m) and let the differcnce of time readings be 
called A;. Then the ratio As/A/ is the average velocity over the 
range of distance Ax centered on P. Now construct a graph, as 
shown in Fig. 2-1 5(a), of As/A/ as a funetion of As. Unless the 
motion of the car has been extraordinarily erratic, the points can 
be fitted by a smooth curve that flattens out for the smaller 
values of As. We extrapolate it baekward, and the value of 
As/A/ for As = is our measure of the instantaneous velocity 
at the central point P. We could equally well plot the values of 
As/A/ against the time intervals A/, as shown in Fig. 2- 15 (b); 
the value of As/A/ at A/ = is again the same, even though the 

Fig. 2-15 (a) Eual- 
ualion ofthe instan- 
taneous velocity ds/dt 
by extrapolation to 
As m of a graph o f 
As/At against As. 
{b) Evalualion of the 
instantaneous velocity 
ds/dt by extrapola- 
tion WAt = of a 
graph ofAs/At 
against At. 

69 Instantaneous velocity 

Fig. 2-16 The "slope" of a graph ofone physica! 
guantity against another is not primarily geometrical; U 
is defined by the ratio of the changes A Q and Aq, each 
measured in whatever unils are appropriale. 

graph itself looks somewhat different. And here, in physical 
terms, is what we mean by evaluating the limit of the average 
velocity, when the range of position or time over which As/At is 
evaluated is shrunk to zero. 

The process described above corresponds to the mathe- 
matical process of determining a derivative — in this case, of 
displacement with respect to time. Using the Standard calculus 
notation, which in the context of the above discussion almost 
speaks for itself, we write 

instantaneous velocity o = lim — = — 
A«-oA/ dt 


The quantity ds/dl, a synonym for the limit of As/At, is, in mathe- 
matical parlance, the first derivative of 5 with respect to t. In 
geometrical terms, it reprcsents the slope of (a tangent to) the 
graph of s versus t at a particular value of t. 

[A note concerning the mcaning of the word "slope" in 
graphs of physical data is in order. The graph — e. g., as in 
Fig. 2-16 — is a display of the numerical measure of one physical 
quantity plotted against the numerical measure of another, using 
scales that are entirely arbitrary and dictated by convenience 
alone. Thus there is, in general, no physical significance to the 
inclination of such a line as measured by a protractor. By "slope" 
we mean simply the ratio of the change in the quantity repre- 
sented on the ordinate to the corresponding change in the quan- 
tity represented on the abscissa— e.g., (Q 2 — <2i)/(<72 — <7i)- In 
this ratio, numerator and denominator are each a pure number 
times a unit, and the slope is then expressible as the quotient of 
these numbers, labeled with its own characteristic units — e.g., 
metcrs per second.] 

If the same ideas as above are applied to changes with time 
of the displacement in space, we arrive at a general definition 
of instantaneous velocity as a veetor: 

.. Ar dt 

v = hm — = — 

Ar—O Ar dt 


In Fig. 2-17(a) we indicate what the evaluation of Ar entails. 
Clearly, if wc display the path of an object as a continuous curve, 
as in Fig. 2-17(b), the instantaneous velocity veetor is tangent 

70 Space, time, and motion 

Fig. 2-17 (a) Vector 
diagram to define a 
small chaiige ofposi- 
tion. (b) Instan- 
taneous velocity vec- 
tor, tangent to the 

to this curvc; this is implicit in the definition. 

With this departurc from straight-line notion, we shall draw 
attention to the distinetion that is made technically (but not 
always faithfully observed) bctwcen the words velocity and speed. 
The speed is the magnitude of the vector velocity v. The spced is 
thus, by definition, a positive, scalar quantity. The o that figures 
in our analysis of straight-line motion has, in faet, represented 
the velocity; it may take on negative as well as positive values, 
which of course is all the information needed to specify the 
direetion of motion in the one-dimensional case. 

Even if we are dealing with motion along a single straight 
line, the use of the vectorial deseription of position and velocity 
will be necessary if displacements are referred to an origin not 

Fig. 2-18 (a) Vector positions in a straight-line motion, 
referred to an origin not on the line. (b) Corresponding 
diagram for a curvilinear path. 

71 Instantancous velocity 

on the line itself. It is, in fact, a very instructive thing to consider 
a straight-line motion from this point of view [see Fig. 2-18(a)], 
because it helps us to scc the one-dimensional situation in its 
larger context. We can become accustomed to the idea that the 
displacement vcctor Ar is, in general, in a different direction from 
the position vcctor r, when the latter is referred to an arbitrary 
origin O. This then makcs the transition from the description of 
a rectilinear path to the description of an arbitrary curved path 
[Fig. 2-18(b)] scem less abrupt. It also emphasizes the fact that 
although it may be very convcnient, in the case of straight-line 
motion, to choose an origin on the line itself, this is certainly not 
necessary and may not always be possible. 


Sincc the vector velocity is the time derivative of the vector dis- 
placement, the velocity of one object relative to another is just 
the vector difference of the individual velocities. Thus if one 
object is at r! and another object is at r 2 , the vector distance R 
from object 1 to object 2 is given by 

R = r2 - n 

The rate of changc of R is then the velocity, V, of object 2 relative 
to object 1 , and wc have 

V m — - — — — 

dt dt dt 


V = v 2 - vi ( 2 ~ 7 ) 

This relative velocity V is the velocity of object 2 in a frame of 
reference attached to object 1. 

In diseussing frames of reference earlier in this chapter, 
we pointed out how the choice of some particular frame of 
reference may be advantageous because it gives us the clearest 
picture of what is going on. Nothing could illustrate this better 
than the practical problems of navigation and the avoidance of 
collisions at sea or in the air. Imagine, for example, two ships 
that at some instant arc in the situation shown in Fig. 2-19(a). 
The veetors v, and v 2 represent their velocities (which we take to 
be constant) with respect to the body of water in which they both 

72 Space, time, and motion 

Fig.2-19 (a)Paths 
of two ships moving 
at consiam velocity 
along courses that 
intersect. (b) Path of 
ship B relative to ship 
A, showing that they 
do not collide even 
lhough their paths 

move. The paths of the ships, extended along the directions of 
motion from the initial points A and B, intersect at a point P. 
Will the ships collide, or will they pass one another at a safe 
distance? The answer to this question is not at all elear if we 
stiek to the ocean frame, but if we deseribe things from the 
standpoint of one of the two ships the analysis becomes very 
straightforward. Let us imagine that we are standing on the deck 
of the ship marked A . Putting ourselves in that frame of reference 
means giving ourselves the velocity Vi with respect to the water. 
But from our standpoint it is as if the water, and everything else, 
were given a velocity equal and opposite to vj. Thus to every 
motion as observed in the ocean frame we add the veetor — Vi, 
as implied by Eq. (2-7). This automatically, and by definition, 
brings A to rest, as it were, and shows us that the velocity of the 
ship B, relative to A, is obtained by combining the veetors v 2 
and —V], as shown in Fig. 2-1 9(b). The veetor distance between 
the ships is unaffected by this change of viewpoint. So now we 
can see the whole picture. B follows the straight line shown, as 
indicated by several successive positions in the diagram. It will 
miss A by the distance AN, the perpendicular distance from A 
to the line of V. The time at which this elosest approach oecurs 
is equal to the distance BN divided by the magnitude of V. Thus 
B seems to sweep aeross /4 's bow, more or less sideways. If you 
have had oceasion to observe a elose encounter of this sort, 
especially if it is out on the open water with no landmarks in 
sight, you will know that it can be a curious experience, quite 

73 Relative velocity and relative motion 

disturbing to the intuitions, because the observed motion of the 
other ship seems to be unrelated to the direction in which it is 


Some of the most fascinating problems in the study of motion, 
and in particular of its relative character, have arisen in man's 
attempts to elucidate the motions of the heavenly bodies, in- 
cluding our own earth, through space. Observational astronomy, 
the first of the exact sciences, has yielded data of marvelous 
accuracy for several thousand years. But the question has always 
been how to interpret these data. Let us consider some of the 
main features of the problem. 

The first thing to recognize is that naked-eye astronomy is, 

Fig. 2-20 (a) Palh 
of Venus omong the 
stars during a 6- 
month period, showing 
reoersed (retrograde) 
motion at one stage. 

(b) Similar set ofob- 
servalions on Mars. 
{.Bot h diagrams after 
E. M. Rogers, 
Physics for the In- 
quiring Mind, 
Princeton Uniuersity 
Press, Princeton, 
N. J., 1960.) 

IA Space, time, and motion 

almost exclusively, the study of directions rather than distancei 
These unaided observations reveal nothing about the distances 
of the stars. The great Greek astronomers Aristarchus (third 
century B.c.) and Hipparchus (~150b.c.) did make reasoned 
estimates of the distances of sun and moon (the latter very 
successfully), ' but the only direct clues to the distances of the 
planets are through such quantitative evidence as changes of 
apparent brightness with time, suggesting that whatever the 
distances of the planets from the earth may be, they undergo 
systematic variations. Thus, as is still the practice, the positions 
of astronomical objects are defined in the first place in terms 
of their directions only (this being all we need to find them with 
a telescope) and can be described as if they were points on the 
surface of a sphere of large but arbitrary radius — the celestial 
sphere — with its center at the earth, and with a polar axis and an 
equator defined by the earth's own axis of rotation (cf. Fig. 2-2). 
In these terms the primary data on the motions of the planets 
are of the type shown in Fig. 2-20. 

It is already a tribute to the genius of the early astronomers 
that they were able to visualize such strange-looking paths as 
the projections, on the celestial sphere, of orbital motions of 
various kinds. In particular, the belief took hold that the orbits 
must be combinations of circular motions. This is not the place 
to go into a detailed account of the problem; some outstandingly 
fine accounts exist elsewhere. 2 Instead, we shall simply focuson 
an idealized presentation of the two main models: an earth- 
centered (geocentric) or a sun-centered (heliocentric) solar 

The most intuitively reasonable picture of the universe, in 
terms of everyday experience, is undoubtedly one that places 
the earth at the center of everything. Not one of us, without 
benefit of hindsight, could interpret his first impressions in any 
other way, and the ancient descriptions, such as the biblical one 
in Genesis, are entirely justifiable in these terms. It was the 
Alexandrian astronomer Ptolemy (—150 a.d.) who built this 
picture into a quantitative model of planetary motions and 

'See the problems at the end of this chapter, and also Chapter 8. 

2 See, for example, E. M. Rogers, Phyiics for the Inguiring Mind, Princeton 

University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1960, Chaps. 12-18, or E. C. Kemble, 

Physical Science, lis Structure and Developmenl, MIT Press, Cambridge, 

Mass., 1966, Chaps. 1-5; or any of a number of excellent books on elementary 


75 Planetary motions: Ptolemy versus Copernicus 

Fig. 2-21 (a) Apparent matian of a planet as explained 
in the Ptolemaic syslem. The planet P moues on the 
epicycle whose center C follows a circular path around 
the earth, E. {b) Copernican explanation ofobserved 
motion. The epicycle of (a) Is seen as being a reflection 
of the earth' s own motion around the sun. 

described it in his great work, the Almagest. Figure 2-21 (a) 
illustrates the essential features. Setting aside the effects of the 
earth's daily rotation, the motion of the sun is an approximately 
circular path, with a period of 1 year, around the earth, E, as 
center. l The motion of a planet, however, is compound. It can 
be fairly closely approximated by imagining that a point C 
travels uniformly around a circular path, and that the planet, P, 
travels in another circular path with respect to C as center. This 
extra circle is called an epicycle; the combination of these two 
motions, if they are in the same plane, gives rise to a complicated 
path that can have backward loops as shown. Precisely the same 
result would be obtained if we interchanged the roles of the two 
circles. (Verify this.) 

If we now imagine viewing this motion from the earth, and 
projecting it onto the celestial sphere or to any other constant 
distance, we obtain almost the kind of variation of angular posi- 
tion that is shown in Fig. 2-20. We can come even closer by 
tilting the plane of the epicycle out of the plane of the primary 

■This path, which carries the sun eastward through the constellations around 
the celestial sphere, is known as the ecliptic. 

76 Space, time, and motion 

circle a little. To fit the motion of a particular planet it is neces- 
sary to choose appropriate values for the ratio of the radii of the 
two circles and also for the times to make one complete circuit 
of each. It is a noteworthy fact that in two cases (Mercury and 
Venus) the period of the primary circle is exactly 1 sidereal year 
(i.e., the period for one complete orbit of the sun around the 
ecliptic), and in the other three cases (Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn) 
the period of the epicycle is 1 sidereal year. Indeed, this can be 
taken as the crucial clue to what we now regard as the truer 

Suppose that we now place the sun at the center, as in 
Fig. 2-21 (b), and make the earth travel around a circle that has 
the same radius as the epicycle in Fig. 2-21 (a). Then if the 
planet, P, travels around another simple circle, of radius equal 
to that of the primary circle in Fig. 2-21 (a), the relative positions 
and velocities of E and P can be made precisely the same as 
before. We have drawn the positions of E and P in the two 
diagrams to display this exact correspondence. The reason for 
the appearance of the sidereal year in one or other of the two 
component motions of a planet in the Ptolemaic model is now 
very clear, and much of the arbitrariness of the whole description 
disappears. It is this new, heliocentric, description with which we 
associate the name of Copernicus. He presented it in great detail 
in his principal work, De Revolutionibus Orbiwn Celestium 
("On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres") published in 
1543, the year of his death. Actually, the first suggestion that 
the sun occupied the central position had been made about 1800 
years earlier by Aristarchus, who from other observations knew 
that the sun was much bigger than the earth (although he seri- 
ously underestimated just how huge and distant it is). There is 
no record, however, that the heliocentric theory was developed 
in quantitative detail before Copernicus. It is interesting, by the 
way, to note his clear understanding of the relativity of motion. 
Here is a translation of his own statement of the principle: 
"For all change in position which is seen is due to a motion 
either of the observer or of the thing looked at, or to changes in 
the position of both, provided that these are different. For when 
things are moved equally relatively to the same things, no motion 
is perceived, as between the object seen and the observer." l 

'From Arthur Berry, A Short History of Astronomy, Dover Publications, 
New York, 1961. 

77 Planetary motions: Ptolemy versus Copernicus 


Given the persistent intrusion of the sidereal year into the 
Ptolemaic scheme, it may seem surprising that the heliocentric 
picture did not prevail at a much earlier stage, especially when 
its possibility had been recognized by Aristarchus about 400 years 
before Ptolemy's day. It must be remembered, however, that 
we have been presenting a greatly oversimplified model of the 
solar system, and the ancient astronomers were legitimately 
worried over discrepancies between thcse idcalized models and 
the precise, hard facts of observation. Both Ptolcmy and Coper- 
nicus were driven to introduce numerous auxiliary circular 
motions to obtain even approximate agreement between theory 
and observation. The Copernican scheme, in the form in which 
Copernicus himself developed it, was not in fact notably less 
arbitrary or less complex than the Ptolemaic. Not until the 
theory could free itself of the cirele as the basis of all celestial 
motion was a fundamental solution to be finally attained, al- 
though the introduetion of dynamical considerations — the laws 
of foree and the laws of motion — transformed the context within 
which the observations were interpreted. We shall come back to 
these questions in Chaptcr 8 and, more fully, in Chaptcr 13. 

2-1 Slarting from a point that can be laken as the origin, a. ship 
travels 30 miles northeast in a straight line, and then 40 miles on 
a course that heads SSW (a direetion making a countcrclockwise 
angle of 247^° with a reference linc drawn eastward). Find the x and 
y coordinates of its final posilion (x eastward, y northward) and its 
distance from the slarting point. 

2-2 The scalar (dot) produet of two veetors, A - B, is equal to 
ABcosOah, where 6 mi is the angle between the veetors. 

(a) By expressing the veetors in terms of their Cartesian compo- 
nents, show that 

A Z B X + AyBy + A,B Z 

cos d a u = 


(b) By using the relation between rectangular and spherical 
polar coordinates [Eq. (2-4)], show that the angle 0i2 between the 
radii to two points (R, 6\, <p\) and (R, 02, <P2) on a sphere is given by 

cos0i2 = cos0i cos 62 + sin 0i sin $2 cos (^2 — <pi) 

(Notc that the distance between the two points as measured along the 

78 Space, timc, and motion 

great circle that passes through them is equal to Rd 12, where 0i2 is 
expressed in radians. This can be used, for example, to calculate 
mileages between points on the earth's surface.) 

2-3 (a) Calculate the Cartesian coordinates of New York, U.S.A. 
(41° N, 74° W) and Sydney, Australia (34° S, 151° E). Take an origin 
of coordinates at the earth's center, with a z axis through the north 
pole and an x axis passing through the equator at the zero of longitude. 
The earth's mean radius is 6370 km. 

(b) Find the distance along an imaginary straight tunnel bored 
through the earth between New York and Sydney. 

(c) Compare the result of (b) with the shortest practicable route 
between these points by a great-circle flight. You can either calculate 
this, using the result of Problem 2-2(b), or measure it directly on a 
globe with the help of a piece of string. 

2-4 (a) Starting from a point on the cquator of a sphere of radius R, 
a partiele travels through an angle a eastward and then through an 
angle /3 along a great circle toward the north pole. If the initial position 
of the point is taken to correspond to x — R, y = 0, z = 0, show 
that its final coordinates are R cos a cos /3, R sin a cos /3, and R sin 0. 
Verify that x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = R 2 - 

(b) Find the coordinates of the final position of the same par- 
tiele if it first travels through an angle a northward, then changes 
course by 90° and travels through an angle /3 along a great circle that 
starts out eastward. 

(c) Show that the straight-line distance As between the end 
points of the displacements in (a) and (b) is given by 

As 2 = 2« 2 (sin/3 - sin a cos P) 2 

(d) Using the above result, check the statement in the text 
(p. 60) that there is a difference of about 40 miles in the end points 
of (1) a displacement of 1000 miles eastward on the earth along the 
equator, followed by a displacement 1000 miles north, and (2) a dis- 
placement of 1000 miles north, followed by a displacement of 1000 
miles starting out eastward on another great circle. (Put Ra = Rp = 
1000 miles. The approximation cos 6 s» 1 — d 2 /2 will be found 

2-5 If you found yoursclf transported to an unfamiliar planet, what 
methods could you suggest 

(a) To verify that the planet is spherical? 

(b) To find the value of its radius? 

2-6 The radius of the earth was found more than 2000 years ago by 
Eratosthenes through a brilliant piece of analysis. He lived at Alex- 
andria, at the mouth of the Nile, and observed that on midsummer 
day at noon, the sun's rays were at 7.2° to the vertical (see the figure). 
He also knew that the people living at a placc 500 miles south of 

79 Problcms 


/ 500 


7.2° ^ 



Alexandria saw the sun as being directly overhead at the same date 
and time. From this information, Eratosthenes deduced the value of 
the earth's radius. What was his answer? 

2-7 It has been suggested that a fundamental unit of length is repre- 
sented by a distance about equal to a nucleon diameter, and that a 
fundamental unit of time is represented by the time it would take a 
light signal (i.e., the fastest kind of signal achievable) to travel across 
a nucleon diameter. Express the radius of the universe and the age 
of the universe in terms of these units, and ponder the results. 

2-8 A particle is confined to motion along the x axis between re- 
fiecting walls at x = and x = a. Between these two limits it moves 
freely at constant velocity. Construct a space-time graph of its motion 

(a) If the walls are perfectly reflecting, so that upon reaching 
either wali the particle's velocity changes sign but not magnitude. 

(b) If upon each reflection the magnitude of the velocity is 
reduced by a factor/(i.e., i>2 = —foi). 

2-9 A particle that starts at x = at t = with velocity +v (along x) 
collides with an identical particle that starts at x = xo at / = with 
velocity —v/2. Construct a space-time graph of the motion before 
and after collision 

(a) For the case that the particles collide elastically, exchanging 

(b) For the case that the particles stick together upon impact. 

2-10 A particle moves along the curve y = Ax 2 such that its x posi- 
tion is given by x = Bt. 

(a) Express the vector position of the particle in the form 
r(f) = xi + yy 

(b) Calculate the speed v (= ds/di) of the particle along this 
path at an arbitrary instant /. 

2-11 The refraction of light may be understood by purely kinematic 
considerations. We need to assume that light takes the shortest 

80 Space, time, and motion 

(timewise) path between two points (Fermat's principle of least time). 
Referring to the figure, let the speed of light in medium 1 be vi and in 
medium 2, i?2- Calculate the time it takes light to go from point A to 
point B as a function of the variable x. Minimize with respect to x. 
Given that 

vi = c/rti 


V2 = c/ri2 

where the n's are known as indices of refraction, prove Snell's law of 

«i sinfli = /»2sin02 

2-12 At 12:00 hours ship A is 10 km east and 20 km north of a certain 
port. It is steaming at 40 km/hr in a direction 30° east of north. At 
the same time ship B is 50 km east and 40 km north of the port, and is 
steaming at 20 km/hr in a direction 30° west of north. 

(a) Draw a diagram of this situation, and find the velocity of B 
relative to A. 

(b) If the ships continue to move with the above velocities, what 
is their closest distance to one another and when does it occur ? 

2-13 The distance from A to B is /. A plane fiies a straight course 
from A to B and back again with a constant speed V relative to the 
air. Calculate the total time taken for this round trip if a wind of 
speed v is blowing in the following directions: 

(a) Along the line from A to B. 

(b) Perpendicular to this line. 

(c) At an angle d to this line. 

Show that the time of the round trip is always increased by the existence 
of the wind. 

2-14 A ship is steaming parallel to a straight coastline, distance D 
offshore, at speed V. A coastguard cutter, whose speed is v ( < V) sets 
out from a port to intcrcept the ship. 

81 Problems 






Bulge rotates 

to keep pace 

with moon- 

^Earth's daily 

(a) Show that the cutter must start out before the ship passes a 
point a distance D(V 2 — v 2 ) 1 ' 2 1 o back along the coast. (H ini: Draw 
a vector diagram to show the vclocity of the cutter as seen from the 

(b) Tf the cutter starts out at the latest possible moment, where 
and when does it reach the ship ? 

2-15 With respect to the "fixed stars/' the earth rotates once on its 
axis in one sidereal day — that is how the sidereal day is defined. 

(a) The length of the year is about 366 sidereal days. By what 
amount is the mean solar day (from noon to noon) longer than the 
sidereal day ? 

(b) The moon completes one orbit with respect to the stars in 
27.3 sidereal days. That is, in this time the line from earth to moon 
turns through 360° with respect to the stars. The time between cor- 
responding high tides on successive days is longer than 1 solar day 
(24 hr) because of this motion of the moon. (The high tide is an ocean 
bulge at a fixed direetion with respect to the moon— see the figure.) 
Show that the daily lag is elose to 50.5 min (60 min = ^ solar day). 

2-16 (a) The orbital radii of Venus and Mars are 0.72 and 1.52 times 
the radius of the earth 's orbit. Their periods are about 0.62 and 1 .88 
times the earth's year. Using these data, construct diagrams by which 
to find how the apparent angular positions of Venus and Mars change 
with time as seen from the earth, assuming that the orbits of all three 
planets lie in the same plane. Compare your results with Fig. 2-20. 
(b) With respect to the ecliptic (the plane of the earth's own 
orbit) the planes of the orbits of Venus and Mars are tilted by about 
3.5° and 2°, respectively. Consider how the apparent paths of Venus 
and Mars are affected by this additional feature. 

2-17 (a) What methods can you suggest for finding the distance from 
the earth to the moon (without using radar or space fiight) ? 


82 Space, time, and motion 


on earth - 

(b) The astronomer Hipparchus, more than 2000 years ago, 
found the distance of the moon as a multiple of the earth's radius by 
observing the duration of a total eclipse of the moon by the earth 
(see the figure). The rays from the sun have a spread of directions of 
about ±5°, and the moon itself subtends an angle of just about ^° 
(the same as the sun within about 2%). The moon takes about 29 
days to circle the earth, and the duration of the total eclipse is about 
l£ hr. Use these data to obtain the moon's distance. 

2-18 The astronomer Aristarchus had the idea of comparing the 
distances of the sun and the moon from the earth by measuring the 
angular separation 6 between them when the moon was exactly half 
full (see the figure). Using our present knowledge of what these 
distances are, criticize the feasibility of the method. Aristarchus found 
6 = 87°. What result would this imply? Calculate what the angle 
really is and what error would be introduced in the distance if this 
angle were uncertain by ±0.1°. 

83 Problems 

At present it is the purpose of our Author merely to 
investigate and to demonstrate some of the properties of 
accelerated motion (whatever the cause of this acceleration 
may be). 

galileo, Dialogues Concerning 
Two New Sciences (1638) 

Accelerated motions 


from THn purely descriptive point of view, the central feature 
of motion is velocity — the instantaneous rate of change of 
position with time. But we must dig a little deeper to get to the 
quantity that proves to be the crucial one in relating motion per 
se (kinematics) to motion as governed by forces (dynamics). 
This is acceleration, the rate of change of velocity with time. 
Again we shall develop the basic ideas in the first instance in the 
context of straight-line motion. If the instantaneous velocity is 
found to be a linear function of time, as in Fig. 3-1 (a), then we 
conclude that the instantaneous acceleration is the same at all 
times and equal to the slope of the graph as evaluated from any 
two points on it. ! If, on the other hand, the values of the instan- 
taneous velocity define some sort of curve, as in Fig. 3-1 (b), 
then we must obtain the instantaneous acceleration at a par- 
ticular value of f by a limiting process: 

• • i- Ad dv .. ,. 

instantaneous acceleration a = lim — — — (3-1) 

a,_o A? di 

Thus the acceleration is the first derivative of the velocity with 

'The units in which this is expressed will be defined by our chosen unit of 
velocity divided by whatever unit of time is found convenient. For example, 
the acceleration of a car is expressed most effectively and vividly in m.p.h. 
per second. But in the more analytical treatment of motions it is almost 
essential to use the same time units throughout, e.g., expressing velocities 
in m/sec and accelerations in m/sec 2 . Otherwise, when we see a symbol 
such as i/, we have to stop and ask ourselves which of the different units it is 
measured in, and that makes for confusion and error. 


Fig. 3-1 (a) Oraph 
ofv versus t for a 
uniformly acceleraled 
motion. (b) Motion 
with varying accelera- 
tion. In the indicated 
time interval Al ihe 
acceleralion is 

v(/ + A/) 

respect to time. If, however, we wish to tie our definition of 
acceleration to a priinary record of position against time, then 
wc can write it as the second derivative of s with respect to /: 


In general, we must be ready to take into account a variation of 
velocity in direction as well as magnitude. This then requircs 
us to considcr the acceleration explicitly as a vector quantity. 
Just as we previously considered vectorial changes of position, 
so now we can show the instantaneous velocity vectors at two 
neighboring instants, as in Fig. 3-2, and can proceed to a state- 
ment of the instantaneous vector acceleration, a: 

.. Av dv d r 

As far as kinematics by itself is concerned, there is no good 
reason why we should stop here. We could define and evaluate 
the rate of change of acceleration, but in general this does not 
represent information of any basic physical interest, and so our 
discussion of mechanics is based almost exclusively on the three 
quantities displacement, velocity, and acceleration. 

You may fcel, cspccially if you have some prior familiarity 
with calculus, that we have gone to excessive lengths in our dis- 

Fig. 3-2 Small change of a velocity that is changing in 
bot/i magnitude and direction. 

86 Accclcratcd motions 

cussion of instantaneous velocity and acceleration. But make no 
mistake about it; these are very subtle concepts. The notion 
that an object could both be at a certain point and moving past 
that point was one that perplexed some of the best minds of 
antiquity. Indeed, it is the subject of one of the famous paradoxes 
of the Greek philosopher, Zeno, who contended that if an object 
was moving it could not be said to be anywhere. l 

If you want to test your own mastery of these ideas, try 
explaining to someone how an object that is at a certain point 
with zero velocity (i. e., instantaneously at rest) can nonetheless 
move away from that point by virtue of having an acceleration. 
It really isn't trivial. 


Given a detailed record of position versus time in a straight-line 
motion, the procedures that we have described enable us to find 
the associated variations of velocity and acceleration. The 
sequence of diagrams in Fig. 3-3, going from top to bottom, 
shows an example of this. But how about the converse of this 
process: given the acceleration as a function of time, to infer the 
graphs of velocity and displacement? The basic definitions of 
velocity and acceleration suggest the appropriate procedure for 
doing this. From Eq. (3-1) we see that the change of velocity Av 
in a short time At is given, at least approximately, by the equation 

Av = aAt 

Of course, "approximately" is not good enough, but we recognize 
that the smaller we choose At to be, the more nearly is Av an 
accurate statement of the change of v. Again we resort to a 
graphical presentation. In Fig. 3-4(a) we show a graph of ac- 
celeration versus time ; it then becomes apparent that a At can be 
read as the area of a narrow rectangular strip, the top of which 
cuts aeross the curve of a versus t. From there it is a short step 
to concluding that the over-all change of v between two given 
values of t is obtained by summing all such rectangular con- 
tributions. (We must, of course, recognize that wherever a is 
negative, the area represented by a At, and hence the change of v, 
is also negative.) We then imagine that the widths At are made 

'On a quite different basis, the uncertainty principle of quanlum mechanies 
expresses our inability to measure both the position and the velocity of a 
moving object with arbitrarily high precision. 

87 The analysis of straight-line motion 

Fig. 3-3 Sel ofre- 
lated graphs showing 
the time dependence 
of (a) posilion, 

(b) velocity, and 

(c) acceleralion. 


vanishingly small so that the sum of all the strips coincides, in 
this limit, with the area under the smooth curve of a versus t. 
This is then written mathematically as a definite integral: 

u 2 — 01 = 

aU) di 


wherc we write a(t) to show that the acceleration is to be con- 
sidered as a specific function of time. Most often this integral is 
evaluated up to some indefinite time /, starting from some choscn 
zero of time at which the velocity is v . Thus we put 

— 00 = 

fl(0 di 


Notice, then, that our integral, starting from knowledge of the 
acceleration as a function of time, gives us only the change of 
velocity during the time /. Information about the value of v at 
t = (or at some other specific time) must be supplied sep- 

88 Accelcratcd motions 



Fig. 3-4 (a) Graphical integration o/a graph of 
acceleration versus time to find change ofvelocity. 
(b) Graphical integration of velocity-time graph to find 

arately; v is a typical example of a constant of integration that 
requires some knowledge of the initial conditions — or of the 
specific value of v at any one value of t. 

In like manner, given the curve such as that of Fig. 3-4(b) 
of v against / (which may represent the initial data or may itself 
have come from the above integration of the acceleration function) 
we can proceed to find the distance traveled. It is represented 
by the area contained between the velocity-time curve, the r axis, 
and the ordinates at two given values of t: 

S2 - si = 

v(t) dt 


Again it is most usual to evaluate the integral from / = up to 
an arbitrary time, and again a constant of integration — the 
position s o at t = — must be supplied : 

s — Si) = 

v(t) dt 


Very often, of course, it is possible to choose Sq = 0, but one 
should never forget that the area included under the velocity- 
time graph gives us only the change of position. 

The simplest applications of these kinematic equations, for 
a = or a = constant, are undoubtedly familiar to you. In the 
first case the velocity-time graph is simply a rectangle, as shown 
in Fig. 3-5(a). If the acceleration is constant (but not zero), 

89 The analysis of straight-line motion 

Fig. 3-5 (a) Veloc- 
ity-time graph for the 
special case ofzero 
acceleration. (b) 
Velocity-lime graph 
for a constant 
(positice) accelera- 

Fig. 3-5(b) is appropriate. The magnitude of the constant ac- 
celeration is given by 

a = slope = 

v — do 

This conforms to the definition of acceleration in Eq. (3-1). 
If we took a as given, then we would obtain this same result by 
integration, according to Eq. (3-4), 

V — DO 

i / dt - 




The area in Fig. 3-5(b) that represents the distance traveled 
can be thought of as made up of the two shaded regions as shown. 

s — so = vot + \{o — Uo)l 

Combining the last two equations, we get 

s — so = Dot + \at 2 

which we can recognize also as the result of evaluating the 
integral in Eq. (3-6) with v(l) = v + at: 

— so = / 

(dq + at) dt = Dot + %at 


It is sometimes convenient to remove all explicit reference to 
the time, by combining Eqs. (3-7) and (3-8). This gives us 

o 2 = u 2 + 2a(s - so) 


90 Accelerated motions 

For ease of reference, we repeat these equations below as a group: 

Kinematic ( o = v + at (3-10a) 

equations l v 2 = vq 2 + 2a(s — so) (3-10b) 

(valid only for constant a){ s = s + o t + \at 2 (3-1 Oc) 

Although these mathematical expressions for accelerated 
motion are tidy and extremely useful, it should be remembered 
that a truly constant acceleration is never maintained indefinitely. 
For example, the problems that everyone learns to solve on free 
fail under gravity, using a constant acceleration g, really do not 
correspond to the facts, because air resistance causes the ac- 
celeration to become less as the velocity increases. For low 
velocities the error may not be big enough to worry about, but it 
is there. Later we shall be dealing with situations in which the 
acceleration varies in some mathematically well-defined way 
with position or time. Thus the emphasis will shift away from 
Eq. (3-10) and toward the more general statements expressed in 
Eqs. (3-4) and (3-6). Another very important factor in solving 
real problems in kinematics is the digital computer. Whether or 
not the acceleration i s described by a mathematically convenient 
function, the actual technique of getting numerical answers to 
problems on motion — e.g., the path of a rocket or a satellite — 
will be the summation of small but finite contributions, corre- 
sponding to the strips of Fig. 3-4. The program for solving 
problems in motion is then represented not by mathematical 
integrals, but by equations such as the following: 

v(t +&t) = v(t) +a(/)Ar 

s(/+A/) = s(l) + v(t)At 
s(t) = so +!>(') A' 

There are many problems in motion that can be handled as 
one-dimensional problems, even though the space in which 
dynamical processes go on is a space of three dimensions. A 
prime reason for this is that it is often feasible to resolve the 
vectors of position, velocity and acceleration into their com- 
ponents in a rectangular coordinate system and then proceed to 
work with the separate components. Under these conditions, as 
we have mentioned before, it is not necessary to make use of 
vector notation as such, even though we know that we are dealing 

91 The anaiysis of straight-line motion 

with directional quantities. It becomes sufficient to choose an 
axis of reference along the given line of the motion and adopt a 
convention that selects one direction along this axis as positive 
and the opposite direction as negative. Which we choose as 
positive is arbitrary, but having made a choice for the purpose 
of a particular problem we must stick to it. Directed quantities 
that are to be found as a result of a calculation — e.g., the un- 
known final coordinate, x, of a particle moving along a straight 
line — will always be taken as measured along the positive direc- 
tion of the axis. If the answer comes out negative, this auto- 
matically tells us that the final position is on the negative side 
of the origin. In other words, it is not necessary (and may be 
actually inadvisable, because it can lead to confusion) to inject 
preconceived ideas as to which sign or direction a quantity will 
be found to have; the mathematics will do it for you. 

Example. A particle starts out at / = from the point 
x = 10 m with an initial velocity v = 15 m/sec and a constant 
acceleration a = — 5 m/sec 2 in the x direction. Find its velocity 
and position at t = 8 sec. 

We have 

o(0 = oo + at 

d(8) = 15 + (-5)(8) = -25 m/sec 


x(t) = x + v l + ial 2 

x(8) = 10 + (15)(8) + |(-5)(8) 2 - -30 m 

Thus at t = 8 sec the particle has passed back through the origin 
to a point on the far side and is traveling in the direction of in- 
creasingly negative x. The whole progress of the motion up to 
t = 8 sec is shown in the two graphs of Fig. 3-6. Notice how 
much information is provided at a glance in these diagrams. One 
sees at once how the velocity falls to zero at / = 3 sec and at 
t = 6 sec becomes equal and opposite to its initial value. One 
sees how the maximum value of x corresponds to the instant at 
which u reaches zero and reverses sign, and that the particle 
returns to its original displacement (x ) at t = 6 sec when v has 
reached the negative of its initial value v Q , so that the total area 
under the velocity-time curve up to that instant is zero. Even 
though this is a very simple and straightforward example, it dis- 

92 Acceleratcd motions 

Fig. 3-6 (a) Veloc- 
ity-time graph for 
specific values of ini- 
tial velocily and con- 
sianl (negatiue) 
(b) Posiiion versus 
timefor the motion 
represented in (a). 







plays many features that are worthy of note. And seeing how the 
various details fit together will greatly strengthen one's grip of 
basic kinematics. 


Occasionally, in turning the mathematical handle in the solution 
of the kinematic equations, one cranks out extraneous roots that 
are contrary to the physical situation. How docs one recognize 
these "incorrect" answcrs and when can thcy be discarded? 

Many of thcsc cxtraneous answers have their origin in the 
fact that in solving a problem we always state initial conditions 
which specify the situation at the moment we first begin to follow 
the motion of the particle at t = 0. Specifying the position and 
velocity at t = does not tell us anything whatsoever about the 
past dynamical history of the particle. lndeed, it is of no con- 
sequence whatsoever how the particle attained these initial values. 
For example, if we think of the motion of a body falling freely 
from rest at an initial height h above the earth's surface, we have 

93 A comment on exlraneous roots 

v = O and y = h. We may have held the body at its initial 
position and released it from rest, or we may have thrown it 
upward so that it rises to a maximum height h. The motion of the 
particle subsequent to the instant of time (t = 0) when it was at 
the height h with zero velocity is identical in both cases. 

The most frequent source of extraneous roots is the equation 
relating displacement to time in motion with constant acceleration 
— i.e., Eq. (3-10c). Mathematically, this is a quadratic equation 
for t and must be solved as such if the displacement is given and 
the time is to be found. 

Because initial conditions alone do not give us information 
about the earlier motion of the particle (unless additional relevant 
data are given), a root of this equation corresponding to a 
negative value of t may not be valid. To illustrate this, consider 
the problem used as an example in the last section. Suppose we 
ask for the value of / at which x = 0. We have 

x(t) = 10 + 15? - £/ 2 

Putting x = 0, we get the following quadratic equation: 

i 2 - 6t - 4 = 

with the roots t = 3 ± V 13 = 6.6 sec or — 0.6 sec. Figure 
3-6(b) makes quite apparent the origin of these two roots and 
shows how the negative root follows from an extrapolation of the 
graph backward into the region of times prior to t = 0. But that 
may be quite unjustified. We might, if asked, say: "Oh yes, I 
held the particle at + 10 m from the origin until t = and then 
fired it off in the positive x direction with its initial velocity of 
15 m/sec." If that were the case, the solution x = Oat* = —0.6 
sec would be a complete fabrication; one would be forced to 
recognize that it simply did not correspond to reality. One 
should not, however, discard extraneous roots without first 
asking, in the way we have just done, whether there is a clear 
physical reason for doing so. 

The matter of extraneous roots has had an interesting con- 
sequence in the history of physics. In quantum mechanics, 
developing a relativistically correct equation led to two values 
for the total energy of an electron : positive and negative. Nega- 
tive values were initially rejected outright as having no physical 
significance. After all, what meaning can one attach to a kinetic 
energy less than zero? However, at a later time, P. A. M. Dirac 
investigated more carefully the nature of these negative energy 

94 Accelerated motions 

Fig. 3-7 Ideal ized 
parabolic trajectory 
for motion under grav- 
ity in the absence of 
air resistance. 

states and was led to a highly successful theory of electrons which 
predicted the existence of positrons and other "antimatter" 


One of the most famous and widely studied problems in motion 
is that of free fail near the earth's surface. It provides an illus- 
tration of the fact that, in the rectangular-coordinate system 
represented by horizontal and vertical directions, the two ortho- 
gonal components of the motion are completely independent 
(provided that air resistance is negligible— see p. 225). The path 
of an object may be treated as two, separate motions occurring 
simultaneously, and each may be analyzed as if the other were 
not present. Galileo, in his Dialogue on the Two Chief World 
Systems (1632), first recognized this fact. 1 

We shall consider the motion of an object hurled with 
initial speed v at an angle as shown in Fig. 3-7 from a height h 

'The accomplishmenls of Galileo Galilei, born in Pisa in 1564, the year of 
Shakespeare's birth and Michaelangelo's dealh, are often citetl as the be- 
ginning of modern science. Galileo's publication on astronomy, Dialogue 
on The Two Chief World Sysiems, incorporated the Copernican model and 
led to confiicts with church authorities. While technically a prisoner of the 
Inquisition, Galileo turncd to the studies of mechanics and published (1638) 
surreptitiously in Holland the results of his investigations "Discourses and 
Mathematical Demonsirations Concerning Two New Sciences Pertaining 
to Mechanics and Local Motion," commonly referred to as Two New Sciences 
(translated, Dover Publications, New York). These books, written largely 
in the form of imaginary conversations, have a surprisingly modern flavor, 
and impress one with Galileo's insight and intellectual sophistication. They 
are well worth reading. 

95 Trajectory problems in two dimensions 

above a level plain. As you know, an approximation to the actual 
motion is obtained by assuming that the horizontal component 
of velocity, v z , remains constant and that the vertical component 
of velocity, v v , is subject to a constant acceleration of magnitude 
g (= 9.8 m/sec 2 ) downward. This approximate description of 
the motion works well provided that the effects of air resistance 
are unimportant, which generally speaking requires compact 
(dense) objects and fairly low velocities. Later we shall consider 
cases in which the resistive effects are important and our present- 
idealized picture of the motion becomes seriously inadequate. 
Let us now see how to answer the following questions: 

1. How long is the object in flight? 

2. What is the range R (the horizontal distance traveled)? 

3. What is the velocity upon striking the ground? 

We shall choose our origin of coordinates at the starting 
point of the particle, and we shall take the positive coordinate 
directions to be upward (y) and to the righl (x). The values of the 
initial and final coordinates, the initial velocity components, and 
the acceleration components are then as shown in Fig. 3-8. 

Fig. 3-8 Anatysis oflhe motion o/ Fig. 3-7 in terms of 
separale horizontal and vertical components. 

p»t = t'o cos e 

- — *- 



Horizontal Component 

Vertical Component 

< ! ox " l 'o COS W,, 

v„ sin o 

„ cos «„ 


u li (minus because it is 

H (unknown) 

below the origin of the 

ai (always) 

coordinate system 

g (acceleration due to 


(a) (b) 

96 Accelerated motions 

[A note about signs is in order here. The acceleration due 
to gravity is represented by a vector, g. In this book we shall 
use the symbol g to represent the scalar magnitude of this vector. 
That is, g denotes the positive quantity equal to 9.8 m/sec 2 or 
32 ft/sec 2 . This is in accord with the usual convention in which 
the symbol A represents the positive scalar magnitude of any 
vector A. After a coordinate system has been chosen, and if the 
upward vertical direction is taken to be positive, then the y com- 
ponent of the vector g becomes —g (i.e., a y = —9.8 m/sec 2 ). In 
some situations it may be convenient to choose the downward 
direction as positive. In this case the y component of g must be 
set equal to +g. We must of course be consistent, within a given 
calculation, about what we mean by the positive coordinate 
direction, but we are completely free to take whichever choice we 
please; the actual content of the final answers cannot depend 
on this.] 

We return now to the trajectory problem, as depicted in 
Figs. 3-7 and 3-8: 

1. How long is the object in flight? 

We know the initial velocity, the initial and final values of 
y, and the vertical acceleration. Therefore, if we take Eq. (3-10c), 
as applied to motion in the y direction, we know everything 
except the time of flight / : 

y = vo y t + \a y t 2 


-h = (do sin 8 )t + \{-g)t 2 

We solve this equation and take the positive root as the physically 
relevant one. 

2. What is the range RP. 

Apply Eq. (3-10c) to the horizontal-component problem: 

x = v 0z t + h a ** 2 


R = (do cos 0o)t + = (do cos 0oV 

In this we substitute the specific value of t obtained in cal- 
culation 1. 

97 Trajectory problems in two dimensions 

3. What is the velocity upon striking the ground? 

The components of v may be found from Eq. (3-10b) using 
the value of / obtained from calculation 1. 

Vz — o d 4- a z t o y = i»o» + Oyt 

v x = do cos Ba v v = "o sin do + (— g)' 

Then from these components we have 

Magnitude of v : o = (v z 2 + v u 2 ) l/2 

o v 

Direction of v : tan d = — 

o x 

(In this case tan will be negative, because represents a direc- 
tion pointing downward below the horizontal.) Alternatively, 
we can calculate the magnitude of o 2 directly from Eq. (3-10b) 
as follows: 

o 2 = «Or 2 = oo 2 cos 2 0o 

v y 2 = v y 2 + 2a u y = o 2 sin 2 6 + 2(-*)(-A) 


v 2 = o 2 + o y 2 = o 2 + 2gh 

The direction of v can then be calculated from the relation 

sin d = — 


Atoms moving in a vacuum cast sharp shadows and give evidence 
of traveling in straight lines. On the other hand, it must surely 
be true that atoms and molecules, as samples of ordinary matter, 
are subject to the usual free fail under gravity at the earth's 
surface. The effect is not very noticeable because evaporated 
atoms have high average speeds— about the same as a rifle 
bullet — but it is measurable. How far would a beam of atoms 
(initially moving horizontally) fail vertically under gravity while 
traveling a horizontal distance L at such speeds? Figure 3-9(a) 
illustrates the problem. It would be just like the trajectory prob- 
lem of the last section, except that this time we take the horizontal 
distance as given and then solvc for the vertical distance y. If an 
origin is taken at the point O as shown, from which the atoms 

98 Accelerated molions 


/ ^ 



— . £^— *- 

Fig. 3-9 (a) Trajec- 


tory ofaloms in 


vacuum with an inisial 

horizontal velocity. 

The vertical displace- 

ment is greatly exag- 

gerated. {b) Para- 

bolic trajectory of 




atoms in an atomic 


beam ihat must pass 
Ihrough the slils A 


and B to reach the 
detector D. 


— *j« lm - 

D H 

start out horizontally with a speed v, we have 
Horizontal component: 

X = GQ x t + %a x t 2 


L = vt 

Vertical component: 

y = v 0y t + \ayt~ 2 
y = + K-*)' 2 

which upon substitution for / gives us 

y = 

-g L 

Suppose that we apply this result to a beam of atoms with a 
speed of about 500 m/sec. In traveling a horizontal distance of 
1 m, the time of flight would be 1/500 sec (2 msec) and we should 

y = — 

2 \500/ 

2 X 10 -5 m 

The deviation from a straight-line path is thus extremely small, 
only a few hundredths of a millimeter. 

Despite the small size of the effect, it has been studied with 

99 Frcc fali of individual atoms 

precision in an experiment by Estermann et al. 1 Their arrange- 
ment was as shown schematically in Fig. 3-9(b). Atoms of 
cesium or potassium were evaporated out of an "oven" at about 
450°K inside a vacuum system. Since the atoms emerge from the 
oven in a variety of directions, the beam was collimated by two 
slits A and B on the same horizontal level, as shown. The slits 
were about 0.02 mm wide. The beam of atoms was detected by 
a horizontal hot-wire detector D, also about 0.02 mm across. 2 
As Fig. 3-9(b) shows, any atom that reaches the detector must 
have a small initial upward component velocity at A in order to 
negotiate the slit system. However, from a point midway be- 
tween A and B where the beam is horizontal, the trajectory is 
just like that shown in Fig. 3-9(a). 

The detector is moved vertically across the beam and the ion 
current, produced by atoms that strike the wire, is recorded. 
In the absence of any gravitational deflection, the intensity dis- 
tribution across the beam should be trapezoidal as in Fig. 3-10(a) 
because the central region would be bordered by "penumbra" 
regions that are a consequence of the two-slit system. Some 
results are shown in Fig. 3-10(b). 

The most obvious feature of these graphs is that they reveal 
a wide spread of speeds in the atoms of a beam. Some atoms are 
moving so fast that they are scarcely deflected at all; others are 
moving so slowly that their deflection is many times greater 
than the most probable deflection (which corresponds to the 
maximum of the intensity distribution). The complete curve 
must reflect a characteristic distribution of speeds of the atoms 
in the oven at a particular temperature. 

We shall not consider the detailed shape of the intensity 
pattern but will fix attention on the deflection of the peak. A 
comparison of the graphs for cesium and potassium makes it 
obvious that potassium atoms (atomic mass = 39) move on the 

'I. Estermann, O. C. Simpson, and O. Stern, Phys. Reo., 71, 238 (1947). 
Similar experiments were reported at about the same time on the free fail of 
thermal neutrons— see L. J. Rainwater and W. W. Havens. Phys. Rev., 70, 
136 (1946). 

2 A neutral Cs or K. atom, striking the hot wire, becomes ionized by losing 
an electron. A nearby electrode at a negative potential with respect to the 
wire will collect these positive ions and the resultant current flow can be 
detected with a sensitive electrometer or galvanometer. If a thin straight wire 
is used, it acts as a detector of width equal to its own diameter. Some atoms 
(e.g., the halogens) tend to capture electrons and form negative ions; the 
sign of the potential of the electrode can be adjusted accordingly. 

100 Accelerated motions 



Vertical line 

along which 

detector travels 


*• Detector current 
Graph showing detector 
response for various 
positions along vertical axis 







i 6 




■= 4 


- /\ Widthof 





*-, ' 1 Width of 


r \ 


V detector 

7 . >>■!-_ 


0.1 0.2 03 0.4 

Deflection, mm 


0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 
Def lection, mm 


F/g. 3-10 (a) Magnified detail of geometrical image 
formed by atoms moving in siraiglu lines through Iwo 
slits. The intensity is proportional t o the area ofthe source 
that can be "seen" by the detector in any given position. 
(6) Actual data on the deflection of beams ofcesium and 
potassium atoms. [After 1. Estermann, O. C. Simpson, 
and O. Stern, Phys. Rev., 71, 238 U947).] 

average much faster than cesium atoms (atomic mass = 133) at 
comparable temperatures. This is an expression of the fact that 
the molecules of different gases at the same temperature have 
equal average kinetic energies — a result that we quote without 
further discussion at this point. As for the actual magnitude of 
the thermal velocities, let us look at the peak of the cesium curve. 
It is displaced relative to the center of a gravitation-free beam 
by about 0.11 mm. Now in the arrangement shown in Fig. 

101 Free fail of individual atoms 

3-9(b), if A B = BC = L, then an analysis of the trajectory will 
show (see Problem 3-10) that atoms of speed v will be displaced 
downward by a distance y given approximately by 

y v* 




Substituting the values L = lm and y = 1.1 X 10~ 4 m we get, 
for the approximatc speed, v = 300 m/sec. 

This very beautiful and delicate experiment was used as a 
test of the theoretical velocity distribution of atoms at a given 
temperature. ' We cite it here as a nice illustration that atoms, 
like baseballs or earth satellites, follow curved paths under the 
action of gravitational forces. Since the motion takes place in a 
vacuum it is, in fact, a more justifiable applicatibn of the idealized 
laws of free fail than are the more usual problems of objects 
moving through the air. You may wonder if it is possible to 
demonstrate the free fail of individual electrons in a similar way. 
This is an immensely more difficult problem, because whereas 
atoms, being electrically neutral, experience only the gravitational 
acceleration, electrons are exposed to stray electric forces that 
completely swamp all gravitational effects unless extraordinary 
precautions are taken. Nonetheless, some experiments have 
been attempted on this problem, although the interpretation of 
the results is a rather complicated affair. 


In the idealized description of motion of a freely moving object 
near the earth's surface, the horizontal component of velocity 
always remains constant and the vertical acceleration always 
has the same value, g (downward). It may be interesting to point 
out that, under these assumptions, every trajectory associated 
with the same value of the constant horizontal velocity, v 0x , 
forms part of a single parabola — a kind of universal curve (see 
Fig. 3-1 1) on which one can mark in the beginning and end points 
of any particular trajectory, as shown. There is nothing profound 

'A similar experimenl, using velocity-selected atoms, has been reported by 
N. B. Johnson and J. C. Zorn, Am. J. Phys., 37, 554 (1969). 

102 Accelerated motions 

Fig. 3-11 "Universal 
parabola" that em- 
bodies all possible 
parabolic trajectories 
for a gicen downward 
acceleralion and a 
given horizontal 
component of velocity. 
The heavily marked 
pari ofthe curve 
beiween poinis C and 
D corresponds lo the 
atomic beam trajec- 
lory ofFig. 3-9(b). 

about this, but it can be useful in helping one to see any in- 
dividual trajectory as part of a larger scheme. For example, it 
makes very clear the relation between the two atomic-beam paths 
shown in Fig. 3-9. 

A closely related feature is the way in which the total velocity 
vector changes during the course of the motion. This is illus- 
trated in Fig. 3-12. Suppose that the initial velocity is repre- 
sented by the vector v i. Then the velocity v 2 , at a time At later, 
is obtained by adding to v i a vertical (downward) vector a At as 
shown. Similarly, every vector representing the instantaneous 
velocity at a subsequent stage in the motion has its end point on 
a vertical line drawn from the end of W\. This result embodies 
the fact that the horizontal component of every such vector has 
the same value. 

Yet another aspect of this same free-fall problem is illus- 
trated by the venerable demonstration of the hunter and the 

Fig, 3-12 Array of 
successive velocity 
vectors for a motion 
in which the accel- 
eralion is constant 
and vertically down- 
ward, as in free fail 
under gravity in the 
absence of air re- 
sistance. (This type 
of diagram is known 
as a hodograph.) 


103 Other features of motion in. frce fail 

Fig. 3-13 Classic monkey-shooting demonsiration. The 
bullet and Ihe monkey undergo egual gravilational dis- 
placements in egual limes and are doomed to meet if ihe 
monkey lets go as soon as he sees ihe gun fired. 

monkey. The hunter aims directly at the monkey as it hangs 
from a limb (see Fig. 3-13). This is really a mistake, because it 
makes no allowance for the fact that the bullet follows a parabolic 
path as shown. But the monkey makes a compensating mistake. 
Seeing the gun aimed directly at him, he lets go of the limb as 
soon as he sees the flash of the gun. Thus the bullet and the 
monkey begin falling at the same instant (ignoring any delays 
due to the time of transit of the light flash and— less justifiably— 
the reaction time of the monkey). It then follows that, in what- 
ever time it takes for the bullet to travel the horizontal distance 
from the gun to the vertical line of the monkey's descent, both 
bullet and monkey receive the same contributions, \gt 2 , to their 
displacement as a result of the gravitational acceleration alone. 
Thus the bullet's trajectory crosses the line of the monkey's fail 
at a point that is bound to be reached at the same time by the 
monkey — with dirc consequences to himself. Note that this 
result is indcpendent of both the speed of the bullet and the 
value of g; it requires only that the bullet would, in the absence 
of gravity, go straight to the monkey's original position. Quite 
remarkable, on the face of it, yet easily understood in terms 
of the basic analysis of accelerated motion. 

104 Accelerated motions 

Fig. 3-14 (a) Small displacement CP1P2) in a uniform 
circular motion. (b) Velocily veciors at the beginning 
and end of the shorl element ofpath. (c) Vector diagram 
for the evaluation of the change ofvelocity, At. 


Probably the most interesting direct application of the vector 
definitions of velocity and acceleration is to the problem of 
motion in a circular path at some constant speed. In this case, 
if the center of the circle is chosen as an origin, the vector r 
always has the same length and simply changes its direction at a 
uniform rate. The instantaneous velocity is always at right angles 
to r, and its magnitude v is constant. From this we can readily 
calculate the acceleration. For during a short time, A/, the 
distance traveled is v A/, from P x to P z along a circular arc 
[Fig. 3-14(a)]. The angle A0 between the two corresponding 
directions of r is therefore given by 

A0 = 


Imagine that the bisector of this angle is drawn [Fig. 3-14(b)] 
and consider the changes in velocity parallel and perpendicular 
to this bisector. Initially the velocity has a component v sin(A 0/2) 
away from O, and v cos(A0/2) transversely. Subsequently it has 
a component v sin(A0/2) toward O, and again i; cos(A0/2) trans- 
versely in the same direction as before. Thus the change of 
velocity is of magnitude 2v sin(A0/2) toward O. Figure 3-14(c) 
shows how this same result comes from considering a vector 

105 Uniform circular motion 

diagram in which Av is defined as that vector which, added to 
v(r), gives v(/ + M). 

As A0 is made vanishingly small, sin(A0/2) becomes in- 
distinguishable from A0/2 itself (in radian measure). ' Thus we 
can put 

|Av| = 2usin(A0/2)-x;A0 
But &d = v M/r, so we have 

|Av| = o 2 M/r 
Hence the magnitude of the acceleration is given by 

(Uniform circular motion) |a| = — (3-12) 

and its direction is radially inward, regardless of whether the 
circular path is being traced out clockwise or counterclockwise. 
This is called the centripetal acceleration (literally, "center- 
seeking") asscciated with any circular motion. The need for a 
dynamical means of supplying this acceleration to an object is an 
essential feature of any motion that is not strictly straight, be- 
cause any change in the direction of the path implies a component 
of Av perpendicular to v itself. 


The result of the last section, and other results of more general 
application, are very nicely developed with the help of polar 
coordinatcs in the plane. The use of this type of analysis is 
particularly appropriate if the origin represents a center of force 
of some kind— e.g., the sun, acting on an orbiting planet. The 
starting point is to writc the position vector r as the product of 
the scalar distance r and the unit vector e r : 

r = re r 


We now consider the change of r with time. This can arise from 
a change of its length, or from a change of its direction, or from 

■Mathematically, this approximation is equivalent to (sin 6)19 -» 1 for 
g-,0. We shall be using this approximaiion often. For a diseussion of it, 
sec, for example, G. B. Thomas Jr., Calculus and Analylic Geometry, 3rd ed., 
Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1960, p. 172. 

106 Accclcraled motions 

Fig. 3-15 (a) Vector 
change ofdisplace- 
ment, Ar, during a 
short time At in a uni- 
form circular motion. 
(b) Changes in the 
unit vectors t, and e« 
during At, showing 
how Ae, is parallel to 
et and Ae« is parallel 
{but opposite) to e,. 

a combination of both. For the present we shall limit ourselves 
to circular motion, in which the length of r remains constant. The 
change of r in a short time At is then as shown in Fig. 3- 15 (a), 
which is almost the same as Fig. 3-14(a). The direction of this 
change (Ar) is in the direction of the unit vector e$ drawn at 
right angles to e r as shown in Fig. 3-1 5(b). Its magnitude, as is 
clear from Fig. 3-15(a), is equal to r A0. Thus we can put 

Ar = rAdee 

Dividing by A/, and letting At tend to zero, we then have the 

(Circular motion) 

dt dB 

v = — = r — e» 
dt dt 


If we designate dd/dt by the single symbol w, for angular velocity 
(measured in rad/sec), we have 

(Circular motion) 

v = wree = ce» 


The derivation of the above result embodies the important 
fact that the unit vector e r is changing with time. Although its 
length is by definition constant, its direction changes in accord 
with the direction of r itself. In fact, we can obtain the explicit 
expression of its rate of change as a special case of Eq. (3-14a), 
with r = 1 : 

d d6 



In an exactly similar way, as Fig. 3-15(b) shows, a change of 8 
implies a change of the other unit vector, ej. If the change of 6 is 
positive, as shown, it can be seen that the change of e$ is in the 
direction of — e r ; it is given by the equation 

107 Velocity and accclcration in polar coordinates 


| (e.)- -** = -we r (3-15b) 

This possible time dependence of the unit vectors in a polar- 
coordinate system is a feature that has no counterpart in rectan- 
gular coordinates, where the unit vectors i, j, and k are defined 
to have the same directions for all values of the position vector r. 
Once we have Eqs. (3-14a) and (3-14b) we can proceed to 
calculate the acceleration by taking the next time derivative. 
If we limit ourselves to the case of uniform circular motion, both 
r and to are constant, so we have 

(Uniform circular d , . 2 o 

... a = cor — (e») = -co re r = e r 

motion) di r 


Thus the result expressed by Eq. (3-12) falls out automatically, 
together with its correct direction. If we label this acceleration 
specifically as a radial acceleration of magnitude a r , we can put 

If, still restricting ourselves to motion in a circle, we remove 
the condition that the motion be uniform, then the acceleration 
vector a has a transverse component also. Starting from Eq. 
(3-14b), we have 

(Arbitrary circular do dd ,. ,_ 

. „ a = — e« — o — e r (3-17) 

motion) di dt 

The radial component of a is the same as we obtained for uniform 
circular motion (since dd/dt = v/r = «), but it is now joined 
by a transverse component, a«. Thus we have 

{_ — = — • = _ 2 
do do) d 6 
ae = -r=r— =r -— 
di dt dfi 

(where co = dd/dt) 


3-1 At t = an object is released from rest at the top of a tali 
building. At the time /o a second object is dropped from the same 

(a) Ignoring air resistance, show that the time at which the 

108 Accelerated motions 

objects have a vertical separation / is given by 

t = — + 1T 

glo 2 

How do you interpret this result for / < £«*o 2 ? 

(b) The above formula implies that there is an optimum value 
of f o so that the separation / reaches some specified value at the earliest 
possible value of /. Calculate this optimum value of fo, and interpret 
the result. 

3-2 Below are some careful measurements taken on a stroboscopic 
photograph of a particle undergoing accelerated motion. The distance 
is measured from the starting point, but the zero of time is set at the 
first position that could be separately identified: 


Distance (cm) 

(in strobe flashes) 

in photo 


















Plot a straight-line graph, based on these data, to show that they are 
fitted by the equation s = %a(t — to) 2 , and find /o- 
3-3 A child's toy car rolling across a sloping floor is known to have 
a constant acceleration. Taking x = at / = 0, it is observed that 
the car is at x = 3 m at / = 1 sec, and at x = 4 m at / = 2 sec. 

(a) What are the acceleration and initial velocity of the car? 

(b) Plot the position of the car as a function of time up to 
/ = 4 sec. 

(c) When is the car at x = 2 m? 

3-4 The faculty resident of a dormitory sees an illegal water-filled 
balloon fail vertically past his window. Having lightning reflexes, he 
observes that the balloon took 0.15 sec to pass from top to bottom of 
his window — a distance of 2 m. Assuming that the balloon was re- 
leased from rest, how high above the bottom of his window was the 
guilty party? 

3-5 The graph on the next page is an actual record of distance 
versus time in a straight-line motion. 

109 Problems 

(a) Find the values of the instantaneous velocity at / = 25, 45, 
and 65 sec. 

(b) Sketch a graph of y as a function of / for the whole trip. 

(c) From (b) estimate very roughly the times at which the ac- 
celeration had its greatest positive and negative values. 

3-6 In 1965 the world records for women's sprint races over different 
distances were as follows: 

60 m 7.2 sec 

100 yd 10.3 sec 
100 m 11.2 sec 

(a) Make an accurate graph of distance in meters versus time in 

(b) The graph will show you that the data can be well fitted by 
assuming that a sprinter has a certain accelcration a for a short time t 
and then continues with a constant speed v. Set up the equation for 
distance x in terms of a, t, and /. 

(c) Find the numerical values of l>, a, and t that fit the de- 
scription given in (b). If this description is correct, what is the dis- 
tance in meters traveled by the sprinters before they reach their steady 

3-7 Two cars are traveling, one behind the other, on a straight road. 
Each has a speed of 70 ft/sec (about 50 mph) and the distance be- 
tween them is 90 ft. The driver of the rear car decides to overtake the 
car ahead and does so by accelerating at 6 ft/sec 2 up to 100 ft/sec 
(about 70 mph) after which he continues at this speed until he is 90 ft 

110 Acceleratcd motions 

ahead of the other car. How far does the overtaking car travel along 
the road between the bcginning and end of this operation? If a third 
car were in sight, coming in the opposite direction at 88 ft/sec (60 mph), 
what would be the minimum safe distance between the third car and 
the overtaking car at the beginning of the overtaking operation? (If 
you are a driver, take note of how large this distance is.) 

3-8 In Paradise Lost, Book I, John Milton describes the fail of Vulcan 
from Heaven to earth i n the following words: 

. . . from M om 
To Noon he fell, from Noon to dewy Eve, 
A Summer's day ; and with the setting Sun 
Dropt from the Zenith like a falling Star .... 

(It was this nasty fail that gave Vulcan his limp, as a result of his 
being thrown out of Heaven by Jove.) 

(a) Clearly air resistance can be ignored in this trip, which was 
mostly through outer space. If we assume that the acceleration had 
the value g (9.8 m/sec 2 ) throughout, how high would Heaven be 
according to Milton's data ? What would have been Vulcan's velocity 
upon entering the top of the atmosphere? 

(b) (Much harder) One really should take account of the fact 
that the acceleration varies inversely as the square of the distance 
from the earth's center. Obtain revised values for the altitude of 
Heaven and the atmospheric entry speed. 

3-9 A particle moves in a vertical plane with constant acceleration. 
Below are values of its x (horizontal) and y (vertical) coordinates at 
three successive instants of time: 

/, sec x, m y, m 



2 X 10- 2 



4 X 10~ 2 



Using the basic definitions of velocity and acceleration (u x = Ax/At, 
etc), calculate 

(a) The x and v components of the average velocity vector during 
the time intervals to 2 X 10 -2 sec and 2 X 10~ 2 to 4 X 10 -2 sec. 

(b) The acceleration vector. 

3-10 (a) The figure [similar to Fig. 3-9(b)] shows a parabolic atomic- 
beam trajectory in vacuum, passing through two narrow slits, a dis- 
tance L apart on the same horizontal level, and traveling an addi- 
tional horizontal distance L to the detector. Verify that the atoms 
arrive at the detector at a vertical distance v below the first slit, such 

111 Problems 



— / *. 

* L 

* L 





that >> » gL 2 /v 2 , where u is the speed of the atoms. (You can assume 
y « L.) 

(b) A beam of rubidium atoms (atomic weight 85) passes 
through two slits at the same level, 1 m apart, and travels an additional 
distance of 2 m to a detector. The maximum intensity is recorded 
when the detector is 0.2 mm below the level of the other slits. What is 
the speed of the atoms detected under these conditions? Compare 
with the results for K and Cs shown in Fig. 3-10(b). What was the 
initial vertical component of velocity at the first slit? 

3-11 (a) Galileo, in his book Two New Sciences (1638), stated that 
the theoretical maximum range of a projectile of given initial speed 
over level ground is obtained at a firing angle of 45° to the horizontal, 
and furthermore that the ranges for angles 45° ± 5 (where 5 can be 
any angle < 45°) are equal to one another. Verify these results if you 
have not been through such calculations previously. 

(b) Show that for any angle of projection (to the horizontal) 
the maximum height reached by a projectile is half what it would be 
at the same instant if gravity were absent. 

3-12 A perfectly elastic ball is thrown against a house and bounces 
back over the head of the thrower, as shown in the figure. When it 
leaves the thrower's hand, the ball is 2 m above the ground and 4 m 
from the wali, and has i>ox - i>o» = 10 m/sec. How far behind the 
thrower does the ball hit the ground? (Assume that g = 10 m/sec 2 .) 

3-13 A man stands on a smooth hillside that makes a constant angle 
a with the horizontal. He throws a pebble with an initial speed vo 
at an angle d above the horizontal (see the figure). 

(a) Show that, if air resistance can be ignored, the pebble lands 
at a distance j down the slope, such that 

s = 

2v sin(0 + a) cos 8 
g cos 2 <x 

(b) Hence show that, for given values of uo and a, the biggest 
value of s is obtained with = 45° — a/2 and is given by 

•Tmn* — 

t-'o (1 + sina) 

g COS 2 £* 

(Use calculus if you likc, but it is not necessary.) 

112 Accelerated motions 

3-14 A baseball is hit out of the stadium and is observed to pass over 
the stands, 400 ft from home plate, at a height of 50 ft. The ball 
leaves the bat at an angle of 45° to the horizontal, and is 4 ft above 
the ground when struck. If air resistance can be ignored (which it 
actually cannot), what magnitude of the ball's initial speed would be 
implied by these numbers? (g = 32 ft/sec 2 .) 

3-15 A stopwatch has a hand of length 2.5 cm that makes one com- 
plete revolution in 10 sec. 

(a) What is the vector displacement of the tip of the hand be- 
tween the points marked 6 sec and 8 sec? (Take an origin of rec- 
tangular coordinates at the center of the watch-face, with a y axis 
passing upward througjt I = 0.) 

(b) What are the velocity and acceleration of the tip as it passes 
the point marked 4 sec on the dial ? 

3-16 Calculate the following centripetal accelerations as fractions or 
multiples of g (« 10 m/sec 2 ): 

(a) The acceleration toward the earth's axis of a person standing 
on the earth at 45° latitude. 

(b) The acceleration of the moon toward the earth. 

(c) The acceleration of an electron moving around a proton at 
a speed of about 2 X 10 6 m/sec in an orbit of radius 0.5 A (the first 
orbit of the Bohr atomic model). 

(d) The acceleration of a point on the rim of a bicycle wheel 
of 26 in. diameter, traveling at 25 mph. 

3-17 A particle moves in a plane; its position can be described by 
rectangular coordinates (x, y) or by polar coordinates (r, 0), where 
x = r cos and y = r sin 6, 

(a) Calculate a z and a y as the time derivatives of r cos and 
r sin 0, respectively, where both r and B are assumed to depend on /. 

(b) Verify that the acceleration components in polar coordinates 
are given by 

a r = a z cos 9 + a u sin 6 
a» = — a x sin 6 + a„ cos 6 

Substitute the values of a z and 0j, from (a) and thus obtain the general 
expressions for a r and a» in polar coordinates. 

3-18 A particle oscillates along the x axis according to the equation 
x = 0.05 sin(5/ — tt/6), where x is in meters and / in sec. 

(a) What are its velocity and acceleration at t = 0? 

(b) Make a drawing to show this motion as the projection of a 
uniform circular motion. 

(c) Using (b), find how long it is, after the particle passes through 
the position x = 0.04 m with a negative velocity, before it passes again 
through the same point, this time with positive velocity. 

113 Problems 

// seems clear to me that no one ever does mean or ever 
has meant by "force" rate ofchange of momentum. 

C. D. broad, Scientific Thought (1923) 

Forces and equilibrium 

as we said at the beginning of this book, Newton's great achieve- 
ment, in creating the science of mechanics, was to develop 
quantitative relationships between the forces acting on an object 
and the changes in the object's motion. More than that, he 
declared that the main task of mechanics was to learn about 
forces from observed motions. But this does not alter the fact 
that the idea of force exists independently of the quantitative 
laws of motion and comes initially from very subjective ex- 
periences — the muscular effort involved in applying a push or a 
puli. We shall begin from this point of view, and rather than 
plunge at once into dynamics, we shall first take a look at forces 
in balance. It has become rather unfashionable to do this be- 
cause, as you probably already know, the accepted units for the 
absolute measurement of force are defined in terms of the motions 
that unbalanced forces produce. We are bound to come to that, 
and in doing so we shall come to the heart of mechanics. Never- 
theless, the quantitative notion of force can be (and was) de- 
veloped in another context — the study of objects at rest, in static 
equilibrium. Indeed, our basic knowledge of the two most im- 
portant forces in mechanics — the gravitational force and the 
Coulomb force between electric charges — was obtained largely 
through laboratory observations of static equilibrium situations, 
using techniques that are still important and broadly applied. 

In discussing forces in equilibrium, we shall begin with 
experiences that are familiar and seemingly quite straightforward. 
Later, after considering some of the problems of motion, we shall 
recognize that tacit assumptions and unsuspected subtleties are 


involved; we shall then be equipped to return to the problem of 
equilibrium with deeper insights and a broader view. But, as we 
said earlier, that kind of development is very good physics; we 
do not try to handle everything at once, but proceed by easy 
stages to extend the range and sophistication of our ideas. 


Let us consider a very simple physical system — an archer's bow. 
In Fig. 4-1 (a) we show the bow in its resting state; the string is 
straight and taut. We know that to bring the bow into the 
situation shown in Fig. 4-1 (b), and to hold it there, a force must 
be supplied. Remove that force and the bowstring snaps back 
toward its straight condition, perhaps launching an arrow in the 
process [Fig. 4-1 (c)]. What conditions have to be satisfied to 
hold the bow in the shape shown in Fig. 4-1 (b)? Putting aside 
the human, subjective aspects of the situation, one can say that 
the forces at the point C are in balance. But what does this 
mean? A force is not disembodied; it is applied to something. 

Fig. 4-1 (a) Schematic diagram of an archer's bow in 
resting stale. (b) Bowstring drawn back at midpoint, 
regu/ring applied force along the bisector ofthe angle 
between the two segments of string. (r) Arrow in the pro- 
cess ofbeing launched. (d) Forces applied at the center of 
the bowstring in situation (6). 

116 Forces and equilibrium 

Fig. 4-2 (a) Balanc- 
ing of equal forces in 
simple egual-arm ar- 
rangement. (b) Bal- 
aiicing ofunequal 
forces in accordance 
with the law ofthe 






S S ^> S fe 

f l 


One cannot imagine a force in the absence of a physical object 
on which it is exerted. In this case the object in question is some 
small part of the bowstring in the immediate neighborhood of 
point C. This little piece of string is exposed to pulls along 
directions CA and CB from the adjoining portions of the string, 
and to a third force, supplied by the archer, along the bisector 
of angle ACB. We can draw a separate diagram, as in Fig. 
4-1 (d), showing the piece of string at C in equilibrium under the 
action of three forces — a force F from the archer, and two forces, 
which by symmetry are of equal magnitude T, from the string. 
These latter combine to give a force, equal and opposite to F, 
along the line of symmetry. But how do we know that the equi- 
librium requires that the bowstring supply a net force equal and 
opposite to F? You might say that this is obvious, but we can 
back up this intuition with a real experiment. It will involve one 
assumption: that identical objects, equally deformed, supply 
pulls or pushes of cqual size. For example, a small loop of string 
can remain at rest if pullcd in opposite directions by two identical 
coiled springs extended by equal amounts. And this balancing 
of equal and opposite forces is the most elementary of all equi- 
librium situations. 

Problems such as that of the archer's bow will not be new 
to you. But let us point out that the analysis of them involves 
our ability to assign numerical magnitudes to individual forces 
and to compare one force with another. How can we do that? 
Archimedes showed the way, when he discovered the law of the 
lever over 2000 years ago. Equal forces balance when applied 
at equal distances on either side of the pivot O [Fig. 4-2(a)]. 
Unequal forces balance [Fig. 4-2(b)] if the condition F\l\ = 
F 2 h is satisfied. Considerations of symmetry alone would 
suggest the first result, but the second has to be based on experi- 
ment. ' To establish it we need to have a way of obtaining 

■Archimedes believed that he could obtain the result by pure logic, but this 
is not so. See Problem 4-5. 

117 Forces in static equilibrium 

Fig. 4-3 Basic ar- 
rangement of a "steel- 
yard" for weighing 
an unknown (X) with 
the help of a Standard 
weight (S) that can 
be moved along the 
horizontal arm. 

multiples of a given force. One method would be to construct a 
number of identical coiled springs. We could first verify that, 
when stretched by equal amounts, they would balance one 
another individually in an equal-arm arrangement. Then we 
could attach several, all at the same distance on one side of the 
pivot, and balance them with a single spring, or some different 
multiple, at the appropriate distance on the other side, as shown 
in Fig. 4-2(b). (Note that such a procedure entails no assump- 
tions about the way in which the force varies with extension for 
an individual spring.) Once the law of the lever has been justified 
in this way, we can use it to measure an unknown force in terms 
of an arbitrary Standard. The technique has been used since 
Archimedes' time, at the very least, for the purpose of weighing 
objects (see Fig. 4-3), and its basic principle, which allows us to 
balance a small force against a large one, using suitably chosen 
lever arms, is exploited in many familiar mechanical devices. 


For the purposcs of this introductory study of forces in equi- 
librium, we do not strictly necd to worry about the absolute 
magnitudes of forces. The introduction of an arbitrary unit of 
force, and the specification of other forces as multiples of this 
unit, would really suffice. However, it will often be convenient 
to express forces in terms of their customary measures, so before 
going further we shall state what these measures are. (You have 
probably met them all before, in any case.) 

The unit of force that we shall most frequently employ, here 
and throughout the book, is the newton (N). This is a force of 

118 Forces and equilibrium 

such a size that it can give an acceleration of 1 m/sec 2 to a mass 
of 1 kg ; it represents the basic unit of force in the MKS system. 
The detailed basis of this definition will be discussed in Chapter 6; 
all that we need for the moment is the recognition that this does 
uniquely define a force of a certain size. The magnitude of this 
unit is such that the gravitational puli exerted on a mass of 1 kg 
near the earth's surface is about 9.8 N. A force of about 1 N 
is represented by the earth's puli on a medium-sized apple — a 
most appropriate result in view of the old tradition (which may 
well be true) that the fail of an apple provided the starting point 
of Newton's profound thoughts about gravitation. 

In the CGS (centimeter-gram-second) system, the unit of 
force is the dyne (dyn), defined as the force that can give an 
acceleration of 1 cm/sec 2 to a mass of 1 g. Since 1 cm = 10~ 2 m, 
and 1 g = 10 -3 kg, we have the relationship 

1 dyn = 10- 5 N 

(In saying this we take the relation F = ma as already estab- 
lished, so that changing m and a by given factors implies changing 
F by the product of those factors.) The dyne is thus an ex- 
ceedingly small force, about equal to the earth's gravitational 
puli on a mass of 1 mg — as represented, for example, by roughly 
a £-in.-square piece of this page. 

The only other force that we shall have occasion to mention 
is the pound. Unlike the newton and the dyne, the pound is 
(or at least was, originally) based directly on the measure of the 
earth's gravitational puli on a Standard object. As soon as one 
recognizes that the gravitational puli on any given object changes 
from one place to another, this definition loses its exactness and 
has to be adjusted. However, setting aside such difnculties of 
detail, we can still say that the pound is a force equal in mag- 
nitude to about 4.5 N. Every time we buy something that is 
weighed out on a spring scale, we are accepting the use of gravita- 
tional units of force such as the pound. We shall considcr the 
practical implications of that in more detail later (Chapter 8). 


The static equilibrium of a given object entails two distinct 

1 . The object shall not be subject to any net force tending to 
119. Ecjuilibrium conditions; forccs as veclors 

Fig. 4-4 (a) An ob- 
ject in ekuilibrium 
uuder the action of 
three nonparailel 
forces. (6) Two 
equally acceptable 
vector diagrams show- 
ing the eguilibrium 
condition 2F = 0. 



move it bodily; it is in what we call translational equilibrium. 

2. The object shall not be subject to any net infiuence tending 
to twist or rotate it; it is in what we call rotational equilibrium. 

The first condition involves, in general, the combination of 
forces acting in different directions, as in our initial example 
of the bowstring. It has been known since long before Newton's 
time that forces are vectors. This says much more than that they 
have characteristic directions; it says that they combine with one 
another in the same way as the prototype vector quantity, posi- 
tional displacement. Imagine, for example, a ring that is a loosc 
fit over a vertical peg. Suppose that it has three strings attached 
to it and that these strings are pulled by forces of relative mag- 
nitudes 3, 4, and 5, as defined by corresponding numbers of 
identical springs equally extended [see Fig. 4-4(a)]. Then ex- 
periment will show that the ring remains in equilibrium, even 
when the peg is removed, if the directions of the forces cor- 
respond exactly to those of a 3-4-5 triangle. This means that the 
forces, represented as vectors with lengths proportional to their 
magnitudes, form a closed triangle, which can be drawn in two 
different ways, as shown in Fig. 4-4(b). In formal terms, we say 
that the three force vectors add up to zero: 

Fi +F2 + F3 = 

It is a basic property of vectors that the order of addition is 
immaterial (Chapter 2). Thus, if we have a large number of 
forces applied to the same object, it is possible to represent their 
addition in many different ways; Fig. 4-5 gives an example. The 
one essential feature is that, in every case, the force vectors form 

120 Forces and equilibrium 

Fig. 4-5 (a) Seueral 
forces acting at the 
same poin:, (b) The 
force veciorsform a 
closed polygon, show- 
ing equilibrium. 
(c) Equioalent veclor 
diagram lo (b). 

a closed polygon (i.e., they add up to zero) if equilibrium exists. 
Since forces may be applied in any direction in three-dimensional 
space, the force polygon is not necessarily confined to a plane, 
and the single statement that the force vectors add up to zero 
will in general be analyzable into three separate statements per- 
taining to three independently chosen directions — usually, al- 
though not necessarily, the mutually orfhogonal axes of a rec- 
tangular coordinate system. Geometrically, one can think of this 
as the projection of the closed vector polygon onto different 
planes; regardless of the distortions of shape, the projected 
polygon remains a closed figure. When written out in algebraic 
terms, the projection involves a statement of the analysis of an 
individual force vector into components, or resolved parts, along 
the chosen directions. Thus the first condition of equilibrium — 
equilibrium with respect to bodily translation — can be written 
as follows: 

Vector statement: 

F = Fi +F2 + F3 + ••■ = 

Component statement: 

F z = F U + F 2l + F 3l + ■ ■ ■ = 
F u = Fi„ + F 2u + Fa, + ■ ■ ■ = 
F z = Fu + F 2l + F 3l + • • • = 


(4-1 b) 

It is worth noticing the relationship between the process 
of adding force vectors and the process of resolving an individual 
force vector into its components. I n Fig. 4-6(a) we show a 
force F, in the xy plane, resolved into the usual orthogonal 

F = Fj + F„j 

121 Equiiibrium conditions; forces as vectors 

Fig. 4-6 (a) Re sol u t ion ofaforce inlo orthogonal com- 
ponents. (b) The components of F, added vectorially to 
theforce —F, giue zero. (c) Resoluiion of F inlo 
nonorthogonal components. 

We represent F by a full line and its components by dashed lines, 
to emphasize that the components are a replacement — a sub- 
stitute— for F itself. In Fig. 4-6(b) we show a elosed veetor foree 
triangle, in which the veetors F x \ and F„\, added to the foree veetor 
—F, represent an cquilibrium situation: 

FA + F v i + (-F) = 

We can then recognize that any other pair of veetors that give 
zero when added to — F are a complete equivalent to F itself. 
Thus we have at our disposal an infinite variety of ways of re- 
solving a given foree into components. For example, the two 
forees F m > and F v > in Fig. 4-6(c) could represent the way of 
analyzing F into components in an oblique coordinate system; 
the faet that F,< may happen to be larger than F itself does not 
invalidate this way of resolving the original foree. 

In a similar vein, if any set of forees combine to give zero, 
as in Fig. 4-7(a), we can regard one of them (which we have 

Fig. 4-7 (a) The 
combination of forees 
Fi, F 2 , and F 3 is bal- 
anced by the equil- 
ibrantF B . (b) The 
same combination of 
forees Fi, F2, and F3 
has the resultant F K . 

122 Forees and equilibrium 

labeled here as ¥ E ) as the equilibrant (i.e., the balancer) of all 
the others. A force equal and opposite to F E is then a force 
completely equivalent to the vector sum of these other forces: 
it is their resuJtant, shown as ¥ R in Fig. 4-7(b). A familiarity 
with these simple relationships can be a considerable help in 
problems of combining or resolving forces and can strengthen 
one*s understanding of equilibrium situations in general. 


We have already used a kind of principle of uniformity to pre- 
scribe a way of reproducing a force of a given magnitude or 
making a known multiple of the force. We assume that identical 
springs, stretched or compressed by equal amounts, define equal 
forces. This assumption leads to consistent conclusions in the 
analysis of equilibrium situations. Picture now a simple ex- 
periment that any two people can do with a pair of identical 
springs. They stand facing each other, and one of them, A, 
agrees to be the active agent. His goal is to push (via the spring 
that he holds) on the end of the spring held by B, the passive 
partner, who tries to avoid pushing back. The size of the push 
that each person exerts is measured by the amount by which his 
spring is compressed. 

You know the result of the experiment, of course. Regard- 
less of the maneuvers made by A and B, the compressions of the 
two springs are always the same ; only the amount of both com- 
pressions together can be varied. This displays, in a particularly 
direct manner, the phenomenon that is expressed by the familiar 
statement: Action and reaction are equal and opposite. In its 
general form this says that, regardless of the detailed form of the 
contact or of the relative hardness or softness of the two objects 
involved, the magnitudes of the forces that each object exerts 
on the other are always exactly equal. Note particularly that, 
from the very way they are defined, these two forces cannot both 
act on the same object. This may seem a trivial and obvious 
remark, but many calculations in elementary mechanics have 
come to grief through a failure to recognize it. 

The production of a force of reaction in response to an 
applied force always involves deformation to some extent. You 
push on a wali, for example, and that is a conscious muscular act; 
but how does the wali know to push back? The answer is that it 

123 Action and reaction in the contact of objects 

yields, however imperceptibly, and it is as a result of such elastic 
deformations that a contact force exerted by the wali comes into 
existence. No matter how rigid a surface may sefem, it always 
gives a little under a push or a puli and cannot supply a contrary 
force until it has done so. There is no basic difference between 
what happens when we sit down in a comfortably upholstered 
chair and what happens when we sit down on a concrete ftoor. 
But in the one case the springs are soft and yield visibly by 
distances of an inch or more, whereas in the other case the springs 
are essentially the individual atoms in a tightly packed solid 
structure, and a deformation by a small fraction of an atomic 
diameter is enough to produce the support required. 


We shall now consider the second condition for static equilib- 
rium of an object, assuming that the first condition, £F = 0, 
has been satisfied. Whether the object is, in fact, in equilibrium 
will now depend on whether or not the forces are applied in such 
a way as to produce a resultant twist. Figure 4-8 illustrates the 
problem with the simplest possible example. An object is acted 
on by two equal and opposite forces. If, as in Fig. 4-8(a), the 
forces are along the line joining the points A and B at which the 
forces are applied, the object is truly in equilibrium; it has no 
tendency to rotate. In any other circumstances [e.g., as shown in 
Fig. 4-8(b)] the object is bound to twist. If the directions of the 
forces remain unchanged as the object turns, equilibrium orienta- 
tion is finally reached, as shown in Fig. 4-8(c). How do we con- 

Fig. 4-8 (a) Rota- 
tional equilibrium with 
equal, opposite forces 
applied at different 
points of an extended 
object. (b) Equal, 
opposite forces ap- 
plied in a way that 
does not give rota- 
tional eouilibrium. 
(c) Iffree to rotate, 
the object mouesfrom 
orientation (b) to an 
equilibrium orienta- 

124 Forces and equilib.rium 

Fig. 4-9 Alt the forces acling 
on a pivoted bar (pf negligible 
weight) in rolalional equilib- 
rium with one force applied on 
each side ofthe pivot. 


struct out of such familiar knowledge a quantitative criterion for 
rotational equilibrium? 

The law of the lever provides the clue. Look again at the 
situations shown in Fig. 4-2. In particular, consider situation (b). 
The balancing of the forces F t and F 2 with respect to the pivot 
at O reauires the condition FJi = F 2 / 2 . The product of the 
force and its lever arm describes its "leverage," or twisting 
ability; the technical term for this is torque. The torques of F t 
and F 2 with respect to O are equal in magnitude but opposite in 
direction — that due to F 2 is clockwise and that due to F\ is 
counterclockwise. Let us call one of them positive and the other 
one negative; then the condition of balance can be expressed in 
another way: The total toraue is equal to zero. 

Although the situation as described above is extremely 
simple, there is more to it than meets the eye, because a further 
force is exerted on the bar at the position of the pivot ; it must be 
of magnitude F, + F 2 if the first condition of equilibrium is to 
be satisfied. Thus the complete array of forces is as shown in 
Fig. 4-9. Now, to be sure, this third force exerts no torque 
about the pivot point O itself. However, what if we choose to 
consider the torques about, let us say, the left-hand end of the 
bar, some distance d to the left of the point of application of F x ? 
Then clearly, with respect to this new origin, the force at O is 
supplying a counterclockwise torque — but it turns out that this 
is exactly balanced by the sum of the torques due to Fj and F 2 
(both clockwise, notice, with respect to the new, hypothetical 
pivot), provided that the condition F\l\ = F 2 / 2 is satisfied. If 
this result is new to you, take a momcnt to convince yourself 
of its correctness. What it says is that, if the vector sum of the 
forces on an object is zero, and if the sum of the torques about 
any one point is zero, then the sum of the torques about any 
other point is also zero. 

So far we have limited ourselves to the balancing of torques 
of parallel forces. Now let us make things more general. Suppose 
that a force F is applied at a point P, somewhere on or in an 

125 Rotational equilibrium; torquc 

K F sin + \Sf 

COS ip 

l ' (J* 

( = r sin^) 


(a) (b) 

Rgi 4-/0 (a) Force F applied at a vector distance r 
front a pivot point. (6) Resolution of F into components 
along and perpendicular lo r. (c) Evaluation of lorgue of 
F by finding its effeclive lever arm, I. 

object [Fig. 4-10(a)]. Consider the torque produced by F about 
some other point O, which might be the position of a real pivot, 
or just an arbitrary point. Let the vector distance from O to 
Z' be r. The first thing to notice is that r and F between them 
define a plane, which we have chosen to be the plane of the 
diagram. Experience, so familiar that it has become second 
nature, tells us that if O were indeed a real pivot point, the effect 
of F would be to produce rotation about an axis perpendicular 
to the plane in which r and F lie. It therefore makes excellent 
sense to associate this direction with the torque itself, regarded 
as a vector of some sort. Now, what about the magnitude of the 
torque? We can calculate this in two ways. The first, indicated 
in Fig. 4-10(b), is to resolve the force into components along and 
perpendicular to r. If the angle between r and F is <p, these 
components are Fcos<p and F sin v», respectively. The radial 
component represents a force directed straight through O and 
hence contributes nothing to the torque. The transverse com- 
ponent, perpendicular to r, gives a torque of magnitude rFsin <?. 
Another way of seeing this result is, as suggested in Fig. 4-10(c), 
to recognize that the effective lever arm of the total force F can 
be formed by drawing the perpendicular ON from O to the line 
along which F acts. Then the torque due to F is just the same as 
if it were actually applied at the point W, at right angles to a 
lever arm of length / equal to r sin <p. ' 

We shall introduce the single symbol M for the magnitude 

•Leonardo da Vinci envisaged the effeclive lever arm of a force in this way 
and called it "the spiritual distance of the force." 

126 Forces and equilibrium 

Fig. 4-11 {a) Cross product. C, oftwo arbilrary vectors, 
A and B. (b) Torque vector, M, as the cross product oft 
and F. (c) Silualion resulling in a torque vecior opposile 
in direclion to thal in (b). 

of the torque. Then we have 

M = rF siri <p (4- 2a ) 

This equation does not contain the necessary information about 
the direclion of the torque, but a compact statement in vector 
algebra, invented specifically for such purposes, is at hand. This 
is the so-called cross product or vector product of two vectors. 
Given two vectors A and B, the cross product C is defined 
to be a vector perpendicular to the plane of A and B and of 
magnitude given by 

C = AB sin 6 

where is the Iesser of the two angles between A and B (the 
other being 2v — d). There are, of course, two opposite vector 
directions normal to the plane of A and B. To establish a unique 
convention we proceed as follows. Imagine rotating the vector A 
through the (smaller) angle until it lies along the direction of B 
[see Fig. 4-1 l(a)]. This establishes a sense of rotation. If the 
fingers of the right hand are curled around in the sense of rota- 
tion, keeping the thumb extended (do it!), the direction of the 
cross product is along the direction of the pointing thumb. The 
shorthand mathematical statement, which is understood to em- 
body all these properties, is then written as 

C = A X B 

127 Rolational equilibrium; torque 

Note carefuily that the order of the factors is crucial; reversing 
the order reverses the sign : 

B X A = -(A X B) 

Using this vector notation, the torque as a vector quantity 
is completely specified by the following equation: 

M = r X F (4-2b) 

Figure 4- 11 (b) and (c) illustrates this for two different values 
of <p; in each case a right-handed rotation about the direction in 
which M points represents, as you can verify, the direction in 
which F would cause rotation to occur. Then, finally, we can 
write down the vector sum of all the torques acting on an object, 
and the second condition of cquilibrium — equilibrium with 
respect to rotation— can be written as follows: 

YM = ri X Fi + r 2 X F 2 + r 3 X F 3 + • • • = (4-3) 

If the object on which a set of forces acts can be regarded 
as an ideal particle (i.e., a point object), then the condition of 
rotational equilibrium becomes superfiuous. Since all the forces 
are applied at the same point, they cannot exert a net torque 
about this point; and if the condition £F = is also satisfied, 
they cannot exert a net torque about any other point either. 
If one wants to put this in more formal terms, one can say that 
the same value of r applies to every term in Eq. (4-3), so that the 
condition £M = reduces to the condition 

r X (EF) = 

and so embodies the condition £F = o for translational equi- 
librium; the equation for rotational equilibrium adds no new 


Figure 4-12 depicts a pair of situations that look so simple, and 
embody results that are so familiar, that you may never have 
paused to wonder about the relation between them. In Fig. 
4-1 2(a) an object is shown attached to two spring balances that 
puli on it horizontally with equal and opposite forces— a clear 
case of static equilibrium. In Fig. 4-1 2(b) the same object hangs 

128 Forces and equilibrium 

-~n=\ — # — E>^ 

Fig. 4-12 (o) Objecl in equi- 

librium under equal and 

opposite horizontal forces 

(from spring balances). (g) 

{b) Objecl in eauilibrium under 

the action ofa single uerlical 

contaclforce (from a spring 

balance) and an incisible in- 
fluence (gracity). (c) The 

reading on the spring balance in 

(b) defines the measured weight 

(W) of the objecl. Byinference 

the gravitational force F„ is (b) (C) 

equal and opposite to W. 

from a single spring balance that pulls vertically upward on it. 

Experience tells us that this is also a case of static equilibriutn, 

yet as far as visible connections are concerned, it is quite clearly 

an unbalanced situation. How do we resolve the dilemma? 

This may seem like a trite or even trivial question. In fact, it is a 

very profound one. At this time we shall examine it only from 

the standpoint of our knowledge of static equilibrium. Later we 

shall see that it has much wider ramifications. 

Try to imagine coming to situation (b) of Fig. 4-12 for the 

first time, with a background of experience in other kinds of 

static equilibrium. You have learned from this previous ex- 
perience that equilibrium always corresponds to having the 
vector sum of the applied forces equal to zero. You are used to 
having tangible and visible evidence of these forces being applied, 
via strings, springs, and so on. Now you see an equilibrium 
situation in which only one force is i n f uli view, so to speak. But 
your confidence in the general validity of the equilibrium con- 
ditions is so strong that you say: "Even though there is no other 
contact, there must be another force acting on the object, equal 
and opposite to the force supplied by the spring." And so you 
postulate the force of gravity, pulling downward on the object. 
But your only measure of it is the reading on the spring balance 
that counteracts this gravitational force. 

It is in terms such as these that we have come to postulate 
and accept the existence of a downward gravitational force 
exerted on every object at or near the earth's surface. In order 
to hold an object at rest relative to the earth, we must apply a 
certain upward force on it. The magnitude of this equilibrating 
force, as measured for example on a spring balance, is what we 
shall call the weight of an object. This is an important definition; 

129 Forces without contact; weight 

we shall restate it : The weight of cm object will be defined as the 
magnitude, W, of the upward force that must be applied to the 
object to hold it at rest relative to the earth. This is an example 
of what is called an operalional dcfinition; we describe the actual 
process that is to be followed to get a practical measurement 
of the quantity in question. Notice especially that we are not 
defining the weight of an object as the gravitational force on it. 
If the connection with the supporting spring is broken, so that 
the object begins to fail freely, then by our definition the object 
is now weightless, although there is no suggestion that the gravi- 
tational force on the object has been changed in any way in the 
process of breaking the connection. (We shall diseuss weight- 
lessness further in Chapter 8.) 

If we return to the situation in which the object is held 
stationary relative to the earth by the puli of the spring, then 
our picture of the forees aeting on the object is as shown in 
Fig. 4-l2(c). On the assumption that this is indeed a static 
equilibrium situation, then we can say that the spring force W 
and the gravitational force F„ are equal and opposite, so that 
the magnitude of W does provide, under these cireumstances, 
a measure of the magnitude of F„. But keep it firmly in mind 
that, in our usc of the terms, weight and gravitational force are 
not synonymous. By maintaining this distinetion we shall be 
much better equipped to handle dynamical problems involving 
gravity later on. 


The use of pulleys and strings to transmit forees has more physics 
in it than one might think and contains some nice applications 
of the principles of static equilibrium. Consider a string passing 
over a cireular pulley of radius R [Fig. 4-1 3(a)]. Let the string 
be pulled by forees F i and F 2 as shown. If this is to be a situation 
of static equilibrium, the pulley must be in both translational 
and rotational cquilibrium. Let us consider the rotational equi- 
librium first. If the pivot is effectivcly frictionless, the only 
torques on the pulley are supplied by the forees Fi and F 2 . 
Since both of these are applied tangcntially, they have equal 
lever arms of length R (assuming that the pulley is pivoted 
exactly at its center). Therefore, to give zero net torque, the 
magnitudes of Fj and F 2 must both be equal to the same value, 
T, which we can thus call the tension in the string — the strength 

130 Forees and eqiiilibrium 

Fig. 4-13 (o) Ten- 
sions in the segments 
of a st ring where it 
meels a slationary 
circular pulley must 
be in rotational equi- 
librium. (b) Set of 
three forces involced 
in the static eguilib- 
rium of a pulley. (c) 
Pulley as a deuicefor 
applying a force of 
gicen magnitude in 
any desired direction. 




of the puli that would be found to be exerted by the string at any 
point along its length. The pulley thus enables us to change the 
direction of an applied force without changing its magnitude. 
However, to satisfy the condition of translational equilibrium, 
the pivot must be able to supply a force F 3 equal and opposite 
to the vector sum of F, and F 2 . This force must therefore lie 
along the bisector of the angle between the two straight seg- 
ments of the string, and its magnitude must be equal to 
2Tcos(6/2) [see Fig. 4-13(b)]. 

If the tension at one end of a string passing over a pulley 
is supplied by a suspended object, then a force F of magnitude 
equal to the weight, W, of the object is needed to maintain equi- 
librium [Fig. 4-13(c)]. This means that a pulley-string system 
can be used to supply a force of magnitude W in any desired 
direction. Figure 4-14 illustrates the typical kind of arrangement 
that exploits these features in a simple experiment to study the 
equilibrium of three concurrent forces. To the extent that the 
pulleys can be treated as ideal, the magnitudes of the forces Fi, 

Fig. 4-14 (a) Simple 
static equilibrium ar- 
rangement involving 
three nonparallel 
forces (string ten- 
sions) applied at the 
pomt P. (b) Vector 
diagram showing the 
equilibrium condition. 



131 Pulleys and strings 




H l- 




F 2) and F 3 are equal to the respective weights W\, W 2 , and W 3 
of the suspended objects. 

4-1 The ends of a rope are held by two men who puli on it with 
equal and opposite forces of magnitude F. Construct a clear argument 
to show why the tension in the rope is F, not 2F. 

4-2 It is a well-known fact that the total gravitational force on an 
object may be represented as a single force acting through a uniquely 
defined point— the "center of gravity"— regardless of the orientation 
of the object. 

(a) For a uniform bar, the center of gravity (CG) coincides with 
the geometrical center. Use this fact to show that the total gravita- 
tional torque about the point P [see part (a) of the figure] may be 
considered as arising from a single force W at the bar's center, or from 
two individual forces of magnitudes Wx/L and W(L — x)/L acting 
at the midpoints of the two scgments defined by P. 

(b) If a bar or rod has a weight W, and a small weight w is hung 
at one end [see part (b) of the figure], use the simpler of the above 
two methods to show that the system balances on a fulcrum placed 
atPif x = LW/UW + »v). 

4-3 Diagram (a) represents a rectangular board, of negligible weight, 
with individual concentrated weights mounted at its corners. 



H'. H», 








(a) To find the position of the CG of this system, one can 
proceed as follows: Choose an origin at the corner O, and introduce 
x and y axes as shown. Imagine the board to be pivoted about a 
horizontal axis along y, and calculate the distance x from this axis at 
which an upward force W (= wi +K-2-f-H'3 + w 4) will keep the 

132 Forces and equilibrium 

system in rotational equilibrium. Next imagine the board to be 
pivoted about a horizontal axis along x, and calculate the correspond- 
ing distance y. Then the center of gravity, C, is at the point (x. y). 

(b) An experimental method of locating the CG is to hang the 
board from two corners in succession (or any other two points, for 
that matter) and mark the direction of a plumbline across the board 
in each case. To verify that this is consistent with (a), imagine the 
board to be suspended from O in a vertical plane [diagram (b)] and 
show by direct consideration of the balancing of torques due to W2, 
h% and m>4 that the board hangs in such a way that the vertical line 
from O passes through C (so that tan d = y /2). 

4-4 You have just finished a 20-page letter to your giri friend (or 
boyfriend) and you want to mail it at once, so that it will be collected 
first thing in the morning. You have a supply of stamps, but un- 
fortunately it is 2 a.m., the local post office is closed, and you haven't 
a letter scale of your own. However, you do have a 12-in. ruler and a 
nickel, and you happen to have learned somewhere that the density 
of nickel is about 9 g/cm 3 . The ruler itsclf balances at its midpoint. 
When the nickel is placed on the ruler at the 1-in. mark, the balance 
point is at the 5-in. mark. When the letter is placed on the ruler, 
centered at the 2-in. mark, the balance point is at S^in. The postal 
rate is 20 cents per half-ounce (international airmail). How much 
postage should you put on? (This problem is drawn from real life. 
You might like to do a similar experiment for yourself, perhaps using 
a differcnt coin as your Standard of weight.) 

4-5 (a) As mentioned in the text (p. 1 17), Archimedes gave what he 
believed to be a theoretical proof of the law of the lever. Starting from 
the necessity that equal forces, F, at equal distances, /, from a fulcrum 
must balance (by symmetry), he argued that one of these forces could, 
again by symmetry, be replaced by a force F/2 at the fulcrum and 
another force F/2 at 21. Show that this argument depends on the 
truth of what it is purporting to prove. 

(b) A less vulnerable argument is based on the experimental 

133 Problems 




knowledge that forces combine as vectors. Suppose that parallel 
forces F\ and F2 are applied to a bar as shown. Imagine that equal 
and opposite forces of magnitude / are introduccd as shown. This 
gives us two resultant force vectors that intersect at a point that 
defines the line of action of their resultant (of magnitude Fi + F2). 
Show that this resultant intersects the bar at the pivot point for which 
Fili = F2/2. 

4-6 Find the tensions in the ropes in the two configurations shown. 
The weight W is in static equilibrium in each case. 

4-7 (a) A elothesline is tied between two poles, 10 m apart, in such 
a way that the sag is negligible. When a wet shirt with a mass of 
0.5 kg is hung at the middle of the line, the midpoint is pulled down 
by 8 cm. What is the tension in the elothesline? 

(b) (With acknowledgements to F. W. Sears.) A car is stranded 
in a diteh, but the driver has a length of rope. The driver knows that 
he is not strong enough to puli the car out directly. Instead, he ties 
the rope tightly between the car and a tree that happens to be 50 ft 
away ; he then pushes transversely on the rope at its midpoint. If the 
midpoint of the rope is displaced transversely by 3 ft when the man 
pushes with a, force of 500 N (= 50 kg ), what force does this exert 
on the car? If this were suflicient to begin to move the car, and the 
man pushed the midpoint of the rope another 2 ft, how far would 
the car be shifted, assuming that the rope does not streteh any further? 
Does this seem like a practical method for dealing with the situation? 

4-8 Prove that if three forces act on an object in equilibrium, they 
must be coplanar and their lines of action must meet at one point 
(unless all three forces are parallel). 

4-9 Painters sometimes work on a plank supported at its ends by 
long ropes that pass over fixed pulleys, as shown in the figure. One 
end of each rope is attached to the plank. On the other side of the 
pulley the rope is loopcd around a hook on the plank, thus holding 
the plank at any desired height. A painter weighing 175 lb works on 
such a plank, of weight 50 lb. 

(a) Keeping in mind that he must be able to move from side to 
side, what is the maximum tension in the ropes? 

(b) Suppose that he uses a rope that supports no more than 
150 lb. One day he finds a firm nail on the wali and loops the rope 
around this instead of around the hook on the plank. But as soon as 
he lets go of the rope, it breaks and he falls to the ground. Why? 

4-10 An inn sign weighing 100 lb is hung as shown in the figure. The 
supporting arm, freely pivoted at the wali, weighs 50 lb, and the 
system is held by a guywire that should not be subjected to a tension 
of more than 250 lb. 

134 Forces and equilibrium 


Slr Isaac 







i w 

(a) What is the minimum safe distance of the point B above 
poin t A ? 

(b) What is the magnitude and direction of the force exerted on 
the supporting arm at A under these conditions? 

4-11 A man begins to climb up a 12-ft ladder (see the figure). The 
man weighs 180 lb, the ladder 20 lb. The wali against which the ladder 
rests is very smooth, which means that the tangential (vertical) com- 
ponent of force at the contact between ladder and wali is negligible. 
The foot of the ladder is placed 6 ft from the wali. The ladder, with 
the man's weight on it, will slip if the tangential (horizontal) force 
at the contact between ladder and ground exceeds 80 lb. How far up 
the ladder can the man safely climb? 

4-12 You want to hang a picture at a certain place on a wali, but the 
only available nails are at points 1 ft to the left and 2 ft to the right 
of the edges of the picture (see the figure). You attach strings of the 
appropriate lengths from these nails to the top corners of the picture, 
as shown, but the picture will not hang straight unless you add a 
balancing weight of some kind. 

(a) If the picture with its frame weighs 10 lb, what is the least 
possible balancing weight, and where would you put it ? (Hint: Find 
the point of intersection of the two tension forces in the strings.) 

(b) In the absence of the balancing weight, how would the 
picture hang? (If you want to go beyond a qualitative discussion, be 
prepared for some rather messy trigonometry.) 

4-13 A yo-yo rests on a table (see the figure) and the free end of its 
string is gently pulled at an angle 6 to the horizontal as shown. 

(a) What is the critical value of 6 such that the yo-yo remains 
stationary, even though it is free to roli? (This problem may be solved 
geometrically if you consider the torques about P, the point of contact 
with the table.) 

135 Problems 

(b) What happens for greater or lesser values of 0? (If you have 
a yo-yo, test your conclusions experimentally.) 

4-14 A simple and widely used chain hoist is based on what is callcd 
a diffcrential pulley. In this arrangement two pulleys of slightly 
different diameter are rigidly connected with a common, fixed axis 
of rotation. An endless chain passes over these pulleys and around a 
free pulley from which the load W is suspended (see the figure). If the 
components of the ditferential pulley have radii a and 0.9a, respec- 
tively, what downward puli applied to one side of the freely hanging 
part of the chain will (ignoring friction) suffice to prevent the load 
from descending if 

(a) the weight of the chain itself can be neglected? 

(b) (more realistic) one takes account of the fact that the freely 
hanging portion of the chain (PQR) has a total weight w? 

4-15 A force F with components F z — 3N, F y = AN, and F z = is 
applied at the point x = 0, y = 5 m, and z = 4 m. Find the mag- 
nitude and direction of the torque, M, of F about the origin. (Express 
the direction in terms of the direction cosines — i.e., the cosines of the 
angles that M makes with the axes.) 

4-16 Analyze in qualitative but careful terms how the act of pushing 
vertically downward on the pedal of a bicycle results in the production 
of a horizontal force that can accelerate the bicycle forward. (Clearly 
the contact of the rear wheel with the ground plays an essential role 
in this situation.) 

136 Forees and equilibrium 

And thus Nature will be very conformable to herselfand 
very simple, performing all the great Motions of the 
heavenly Bodies by the attraction of gravity . . . and 
almost all the small ones of their Particles by some other 
attracting and repelling Powers .... 

newton, Opticks (1730) 

The various forces 
of nature 


all forces arise from the interactions between difFerent objects. 
Once upon a time it must have seemed that these interactions 
were bewilderingly diverse, and one of the most remarkable 
features in the development of modern science has been the 
growing realization that only a very few basically distinct kinds 
of interaction are at work. The following are the only forces 
that we know of at present: 

1 . Gravitational forces, which arise between objects because 
of their masses. 

2. Electromagnetic forces, due to electric charges at rest or 
in motion. 

3. Nuclear forces, which dominate the interaction between 
subatomic particles if they are separated by distances less than 
about 10 -15 m. 

It may be that evcn this degree of categorization will prove 

>An excellent background to this topic is the PSSC film, "Forces," by J. R. 
Zacharias, produced by Education Development Center, Inc., Newton, Mass., 
1959. The title of this chapter is borrowed from that of a set of popular lec- 
tures delivered in London by the great scientist, Michael Faraday, just over 
100 years ago and available in paperback (Viking, New York, 1960). They 
make easy and rather delightful reading. 


to be unnecessarily great; the theoretical physicist's dream is to 
find a unifying idea that would allow us to recognize all these 
forces as aspects of one and the same thing. Albert Einstein 
spent most of his later years on this problem but to no avail, 
and at the present time the assumption of several different kinds 
of forces seems meaningful as well as convenient. 

In the following sections we shall briefly consider these 
three primary types of forces, with examples of physical systems 
in which they are significant. It will be useful, and from the 
standpoint of classical mechanics very important, to add to our 
classification what we shall call "contact forces" — the forces 
manifested in the mechanical contact of ordinary objects. Al- 
though these forces are merely the gross, large-scale manifesta- 
tion of the basic electromagnetic forces between large numbers 
of atoms, they serve so well to describe most of the familiar 
interactions in mechanical phenomena that they merit a category 
of their own. 


Ali our experience suggests that a gravitational interaction be- 
tween material objects is a universal phenomenon. It is always 
an attractive interaction. The gravitational forces exerted by the 
earth on different objects near its surface can be compared, by 
using a spring balance for example, and these gravitational 
attractions are proportional, in every case, to the property of the 
attracted object that we call its mass. (The content and the im- 
plications of this familiar and seemingly simple statement will 
be a matter for detailed discussion in later chapters.) 

The general law of gravitational interaction arrived at by 
Newton states that the force F with which any particle attracts 
any other is proportional to the product of the masses of the 
particles, inversely proportional to the square of thcir separation, 
and directed along the line separating the two particles. It is 
found experimentally that this force has no measurable de- 
pendence on the velocity of the particle on which it acts. ' The 
magnitudo of the force F 1 3 that a particle of mass m 1 exerts on a 

■Departures from ihis velocity indcpendence are analyzcd in the general 
theory of relativity. They are discernible only if the effect of quantities of 
the order of o 2 /c 2 (where c is the speed of light) can be detected in the gravi- 
tational interaction. 

140 The various forces of natura 

particle of mass m 2 can be written as 

F l2 = G^f (5-1) 

where r l2 is the distance from the center of mi to the center 
of m 2 and G is a constant of proportionality called the universal 
gravitational constant. This law of force holds for point masses 
and for uniform spheres of finite size. The value of the constant 
G is 0.667 X 10- lo m 3 /kg-sec 2 . 

Equation (5-1), and the preceding verbal expression of it, 
is the first example in this book of the quantitative expression 
of a physical law. It is worth spending a few words to discuss 
what it really says. Every mathematical statement of experi- 
mental relationships in physics is no more than a statement of a 
relationship between numbers. By m i and m 2 we simply mean the 
numerical measures of the masses of particles 1 and 2 in terms 
of some arbitrarily chosen unit. The concept of mass is one that 
has been developed to aid us in our description of nature— like- 
wise the concepts of force and distance. But it is always the 
numbers that we deal with. Thus the full verbal equivalent of 
Eq. (5-1) would be: 

The numerical measure of the force F with which any particle at- 
tracts any other is proportional to the product of the numerical 
measures of their masses and inversely proportional to the square 
of the numerical measure of their separation. 

Keep those italicized phrases in mind whenever you read the 
mathematical statement of a physical relationship. They are 
almost never included explicitly, yet without them there is a 
danger of reading more into such a statement than it really con- 
tains. Thus the customary type of abbreviated colloquial state- 
ment of the law of gravitation begins: "The force of gravitational 
attraction between two particles is proportional to the product 
of their masses . . . ." What, one may ask, is meant by the product 
of two masses? What sort of a physical quantity is that? Even 
very good seientists have been drawn, at times, into almost 
metaphysical arguments through the effort to read some special 
significance into the "dimensions" of such combinations. By 
reminding oneself what an equation such as Eq. (5-1) actually 
represents, one can avoid any such confusion. 

The classic experiment to measure G was performed by 
the British physicist Henry Cavendish in 1798. It involved a 

141 Gravitational forees 

Fig. 5-1 Sehemat ic diagram of a gravity lorsion- 
balance experiment. 

measurement of the gravitational foree between solid lead spheres 
of modest dimensions and made use of an ingenious mechanical 
arrangement — a torsion balance — to detect this tiny attractive 
foree. Figure 5-1 shows the essential features of the arrangement. 
Two small lead spheres are placed at the ends of a light rod. The 
rod is suspended horizontally by a very thin metal fiber attached 
to its midpoint. Two larger lead spheres are positioned elose to 
the smaller ones, in symmetrical fashion, so that the gravita- 
tional attraction between these pairs of large and small masses 
tends to rotate the rod in a horizontal plane. An equilibrium 
orientation is reached when the twist of the supporting fiber 
provides a restoring effect that just balances the gravitational 
attraction. A beam of light reflected from a small mirror attached 
to the rod allows the tiny angular deflection to be amplified into 
a substantial movement of a spot formed by the reflected light on 
a distant wali (the "optical lever" effect). A torsion-balance 
arrangement of this type, incorporating an optical lever, is one 
of the most sensitive of all mechanical devices. 

The gravitational foree is astonishingly weak under the 
conditions of a laboratory cxperiment involving the interaetion 
of relatively small objects, and the detection and measurement 
of it is an extremely delicate operation. For example, a modern 
version of the Cavendish apparatus 1 uses two small suspended 
lead spheres, each of 15-g mass, and large spheres of 1.5 kg each. 
The center-to-center distance between a small sphere and a 

■Manufactured by the Leybold Co. 

142 The va-rious forees of nature 

Fig. 5-2 Globular 
cluster ofstars held 
together by graoita- 
lionalforces (globular 
cluster M 13 in the 
constellation Her- 
cules). (Photograph 
from the Hale Obser- 

large one is about 5 cm. Under these conditions the gravita- 
tional force of attraction is only about 6 X 10~ 10 N. The 
weight of a single human hair is about 10,000 times greater 
than this! 

Although the gravitational interaction is intrinsically so very 
feeble, it plays the prime role in most astronomical systems, 
because (1) the interacting objects are extremely massive and (2) 
other forces are almost absent. An interesting example is pro- 
vided by globular star clusters. These are collections of stars 
in a spherically symmetric distribution ; more than 120 such 
clusters have been identified in our galaxy. Figure 5-2 shows a 
globular cluster containing perhaps more than a million stars. 
One can infer from the symmetry of this system that there is 
probably no net rotational motion to the cluster as a whole 
though individual stars undoubtedly travel in all directions. 
Direct experimental evidence on the actual motions of individual 
stars is very meager. If we consider a star "at rest" near the outer 
edge of the cluster, the net force due to all other stars should be 
(by symmetry) toward the center of the cluster and the star will 
accelerate, reaching its maximum speed at the center. The net 
force on the star (again by symmetry considerations) will ap- 
proach zero as the star reaches the center of the cluster. Having 
gained considerable speed, the star will pass through the center 
and gradually slow down due to the resultant force of attraction 

143 Gravitational forces 

Fig. 5-3 Schematic 
diagram ofa group of 
globular clusters asso- 
ciated with our 

of all the other stars (which at all times is a net force directed 
toward the center of the cluster). The star will finally reach a 
point diametrically opposite its starting position. Thus a star 
could perform oscillations along a diameter passing through the 
center of cluster. Because the separation between stars is so very 
much greater than the diameter of any star, the chance of a 
stellar collision is very small, even at the center of the cluster 
(although the photograph would not suggest this). 

Thcre is clear astronomical evidence for other systems of a 
similar type but on a much larger scale. Our Galaxy is surrounded 
by a spherically symmetric "halo" of globular clusters (see the 
sketch shown in Fig. 5-3). Since the individual clusters maintain 
their compact identity, each can itself be considered a "mass 
point," and together they form a sort of supercluster of globular 
clusters. Direct observational evidence shows that clusters are 
traveling in all directions and there is no reason to doubt that a 
single cluster can perform oscillations through the heart of our 
Galaxy (just as single stars can oscillatc within a cluster), again 
with almost negligible chance of individual stars colliding with 
each other. 

These two similar examplcs illustrate cases where gravita- 
tional attraction between masses is the sole force that governs 
the motion. Usually gravitational forces are important only 
where at least one body of astronomical size is involved — note 
that it is solely because the earth is in this category that gravity 
exercises a major influence on our everyday lives. One can 
think of certain exceptions to this general rule, as for example 
the initial stages of the aggregation of neutral hydrogen atoms 

144 The various forces of naturc 

under their mutual gravitational attractions to form a proto- 


The forces that electrically charged particles exert on one another 
are of fundamental importance in nature. The basic law of 
electric force is that found by the nineteenth-century French 
physicist C. A. Coulomb, and known by his name. Like 
Cavendish, Coulomb used a torsion balance for his measure- 
ments. 1 But whereas Cavendish simply measured the gravita- 
tional constant, taking the basic form of the force law as already 
known, Coulomb explored the actual form of the law of electric 
force. Coulomb's law states that a charged particle at rest will 
attract or repel another charged particle at rest with a force 
proportional to the product of the charges, inversely propor- 
tional to the square of their separation and directed along the 
line separating the two particles. 2 The force is attractive when 
the charges are unlike and repulsive when they are alike in sign. 
If one denotes by qi and q 2 the charges carried by the particles, 
the magnitude of the force that particle 1 exerts on particle 2 is 
given by 

*»-km (5-2) 

identical in form with the law of universal gravitation. The 
metric unit of electric charge is the coulomb (C). The constant k 
in Coulomb's law has the value 9 X 10 9 N-m 2 /C 2 . 

A coulomb is a huge amount of electric charge — vastly 
more than is usually found in isolation in nature. One coulomb 
separated from a similar charge 1 mile distant would experience 
a repulsive force of about 3500 N (approximately 800 lb). Yet 
an electrically neutral droplet of water | in. in diameter contains 
nearly 1000 C of positive charge in the nuclei of the hydrogen 
and oxygen atoms, balanced by an equal amount of negatively 
charged electrons. (Check this for yourself.) 

'Their experiments were performed at almost the same time, but apparently 
they acted quite independently of one another in their choice and development 
of the torsion-balance technique. 

2 Note that insertion, where appropriate, of the phrase "numerical measure 
of" is tacitly assumed. 

145 Electric and magnetie forces 

Fig. 5-4 Cakulaled irajectories 
ofprotons ofaboul 14 Gev kinetic 
energy approaching the earth 'm its 
magnetic egualorial place and 
deflected by its magnetic field. 
(After D. J. X. Monlgomery, 
Cosmic Ray Physics, Princeton 
Unioersity Press, 1949.) 

It is interesting to compare the sizes of electrical forces with 
those of gravity. Consider, for example, the gravitational torsion 
balance mentioned earlier. If only one out of every 10 ' 8 electrons 
in each lead sphere were missing, the resultant imbalance of 
electric charge on the masses would produce an electrical force 
comparable to the gravitational force. Through such examples 
one can appreciate the immense strength of the electrical force 
compared to the gravitational force. 

Although gravity is always present, the electrical force is 
overwhelmingly the most significant agent in all chemical and 
biological processes and in the interactions between physical 
objects of everyday size (i.e., below those of the astronomical 
domain). It holds atoms together, provides the rigidity and 
tensile strength of material objects, and is the only force involved 
in chemical reactions. 

We have been discussing the electrical forces between 
stationary charged particles. Moving charged particles also exert 
electrical forces on each other. But an additional force arises in 
this case which we call the magnetic force. It has the interesting 
property that it depends on the velocity of the charges and always 
acts on a given charged particle at right angles to the particle's 
motion. We shall discuss these magnetic forces more precisely 
in Chapter 7. 

An illustration of the magnetic force is provided by the 
trajectories of protons (positively charged) ejected from the sun 
and approaching the earth. Figure 5-4 shows possible paths 
of protons approaching in the equatorial plane, when they pass 

146 The various forces of nature 

in the vicinity of the earth's magnetic field. It is confidently 
believed that the earth's magnetic field itself arises as a result 
of charged particles in motion inside the earth, so basically this 
is an example of the electromagnetic interaction between charges 
in motion. 

Actually, from the standpoint of relativity theory, the mag- 
netic force is not something new and different. Charges that are 
moving with respect to one observer can be stationary with 
respect to another. Thus, if one accepts the basic idea of rela- 
tivity, one may expect to be able to relate a magnetic force, as 
observed in one reference frame, to a Coulomb force, as ob- 
served in another frame. For the detailed working out of this 
idea, see for example the volume Special Relativity in this series. 


Although electric forces are responsible for holding atoms to- 
gether, they would, by themselves, prevent the existence of 
atomic nuclei. For we all know that nuclei contain protons, 
electrically repelling one another and not stabilized by a com- 
pensating negative charge. But nature has supplied another 
force, known as the sirong interaction, which binds together the 
nucleons (protons and neutrons) in a nucleus. Although much 
stronger than the Coulomb force at sufficiently short distances, 
its properties were relatively unknown until recently because 
of its extremely short range. For distances greater than about 
10 -13 cm (= 1 F) this nuclear force quickly becomes negligibly 
small, but it dominates over all other interactions between 
nucleons at shorter distances. It is an exceedingly complex type 
of interaction, attractive down to about 0.4 F and strongly re- 
pulsive for still smaller separations. It is, in part, a noncentral 
force— that is, in contrast to the gravitational and Coulomb 
interactions, it is not directed along the line joining the centers 
of the interacting particles. Somewhat analogously to the Cou- 
lomb force, which exists only between electrically charged 
particles, the strong nuclear interaction exists only among a 
certain class of particles, known as hadrons (Gr. hadros: heavy, 
bulky), which besides the nucleons themselves includes a number 
of lighter particles (mesons) and heavier particles (baryons), all 
of which are unstable and very short-lived (10 -8 sec or less). 
Another type of force associated with nuclear interactions 

147 Nuclear forces 

is also known to exist but is not very well understood as yet. 
It is called the "weak interaction." The range of this force is 
even less than that of the strong interactions, and its strength is 
estimated to be only about 10 -15 as great as the other. This 
weak interaction is important only for certain types of nuclear 
process, such as radioactive beta decay. 

It is instructive to compare the magnitudes of the different 
types of forces exerted between two protons 10~ 15 m apart — i.e., 
separated by about one nucleon diameter: 

Type of interaction Approximate magnitude of the force, N 

Gravitational 2 X 10-" 

Coulomb 2 X 10 2 

Nuclear (strong) 2 X 10» 

The magnitude of the weak nuclear interaction, within the range 
in which it is effective, is of the order of 10~ 1 3 of the electrical 
force, but even so it is greater, by a factor of the order of 10 23 , 
than the calculated gravitational force at the same distance be- 
tween two particles. 

The nuclear forces have really no place in a discussion of 
Newtonian mechanics. Indeed, the very use of the word "force" 
in connection with nuclear interactions is open to question, for 
any statement about the force between two nuclear particles is 
at best a remote inference. We cannot cite any direct observa- 
tions comparable to those of Cavendish and Coulomb for 
gravitational and electrical forces. Moreover, the subject of 
nuclear forces, like everything else in subatomic physics, requires 
the ideas and techniques of quantum mechanics, which is a 
theory that has almost no use for the concept of force as such. 
Thus, when we talk of classical or Newtonian mechanics, we are 
really concerned with situations in which the only relevant kinds 
of interactions are electromagnetic or gravitational. 


It is a fact of profound importance that, in contrast to gravita- 
tion, the electric forces between individual particles may be 
repulsive as well as attractive, because of the existence of two 
different signs of electric charge. This duality of charge makes 
possible the existence of mattcr that is clectrically neutral in 

148 The various forces of nature 

bulk and of atoms that are individually neutral by virtue of 
having equal numbers of protons and electrons. 1 

On the face of it, therefore, two neutral atoms would exert 
no forces on one another at all when separated (if one excepts 
the usually negligible gravitational force). This, however, is not 
quite true. It would be the case if the positive and negative 
charges in an atom were located at a single point. We know, 
however, that the electrons and the nucleus are separated by a 
certain small amount. Also, the atom is not a rigid structure; 
and although the "center of gravity" of the negative charge 
distribution due to the electrons coincides with the positive 
nucleus when the atom is isolated, the approach of another 
particle can disturb this situation. One manifestation of this is a 
characteristic force of attraction between neutral atoms— a force 
named after the great Dutch physicist J. van der Waals. This 
force increases much more rapidly than l/r 2 as two atoms ap- 
proach one another— or (to put it in a way that carries a subtly 
different message) the force falls off with increasing distance 
much more rapidly than the attraction between two unbalanced 
charges of opposite sign. 

The basis of the van der Waals force is still, of course, the 
inverse-square law of force between point charges, but its detailed 
character cannot be calculated without the use of quantum 
mechanics. The final result is a force varying as l/r 7 between 
neutral atoms of the same kind. 

There is, however, another kind of force that comes into 
play between neutral atoms when the attempt is made to squash 
them together. This is a positive (repulsive) force that increases 
with decreasing separation even more rapidly than the van der 
Waals force. The result is that the net force exerted by one 
neutral atom on another, as a function of the separation r be- 
tween their centers, has the kind of variation shown in Fig. 5-5. 
The force passes through zero at a certain value of r, and this 
value (r o) can be thought of as the sum of the two atomic radii— 
i.e., one atomic diameter if the atoms are identical. The repulsive 
component of F grows so sharply with further decrease of r 
below r that atoms behave to some approximation as hard 
spheres; one manifestation of this is the highly incompressible 

'J. G. King has shown by direct invesligation of the degree of neutrality of a 
volume of gas that the basic units of positive and negative charge in ordinary 
matter cannot differ by more than about 1 part in 10" (private communica- 

149 Forces between neutral atoms 

Fig. 5-5 Qualitative graph oflhe 
force between two neutral aloms 
as a function of the distance be- 
tween their centers. The dashed 
line represents the nonphysical 
idealization of aloms t hai act as 
completely hard spheres Ihal 
attract one anolher. 

nature of condensed matter. The dashed line in Fig. 5-5 in- 
dicates the result of idealizing the interatomic force to correspond 
to complete impenetrability for r < r and the van der Waals 
attraction for r > r . This model can be used quite effectively 
to analyze the deviations of an actual gas from the ideal gas laws. 
Since almost all the objects we deal with in classical me- 
chanics are electrically neutral, this basic atomic interaction — 
the electric force between neutral particles — is of fundamental 
importance, as we shall discuss next. 


Many of the physical systems we shall deal with are the ordinary 
objects of everyday experience, acted upon by such forces as 
friction, the push and puli of struts and beams, the tension of 
strings and cables, and so on. Each of these forces involves what 
we naively call physical "contact" with the object under ob- 

Consider, for example, a book resting on a horizontal table. 
The book is supported by the sum total of countless electro- 
magnetic interactions between atoms in the adjacent surface 
layers of the book and the table. A submicroscopic analysis of 
these interactions would be prohibitively complex. For most 
purposes, however, we can ignore this complexity and can lump 
all these interactions together into a single force that we shall 
call a contact force. This is a rather artificial category but a 
useful one. Broadly speaking, all the familiar forces of a me- 
chanical nature, including the force that a liquid or a gas exerts 
on a surface, are contact forces in this sense. Our discussion in 
the previous section makes it clear that they are electric forces 

150 The various forces of nature 

Fig. 5-6 (a) Two charged spheres, obciously not in 
conlact. The weight of the upper sphere is balanced by 
the electrical repulsion. (b) Two uncharged spheres, 
apparently in conlact. Oli a sufficiently magnified scale, 
this appearance ofa conlact ofsharp geometrical bound- 
aries would disappear. 

Fig. 5-7 (a) Quali- 
tatwe graph offorce 
versus separation for 
the charged spheres 
ofFig. 5-6{a). The 
conlact is "soft" — 
i. e., the difference be- 
tween F and W varies 
slowly with r. 
(b) Comparable graph 
for the uncharged 
spheres ofFig. 5-5(6). 
The conlact is "hard" 
— the near equality of 
F and W occurs only 
over an extremely 
narrow range of 
values of r. 

exerted between electrically neutral objects. The development 
of such forces when one smooth, hard object is pressed against 
another comes about through a distortion of the distributions 
of positive and negative electric charges. It is characteristic of 
such forces that their variation with the distance between the 
objects is much more rapid than the inverse-square dependence 
that holds for objects carrying a net charge. Thus the contact 
forces are, in effect, forces of very short range; they fail to 
negligible size when objects are more than about one atomic 
diameter apart. The fact, however, that they do have a syste- 
matic dependence on the distance of separation means that the 
notion of what we ultimately mean by "contact" is not clear-cut. 
There is no fundamental distinction between the situation repre- 
sented by two charged spheres, visibly held apart by their elec- 
trical repulsion, and the same two spheres, uncharged, apparently 
in contact, as shown in Fig. 5-6. In each case the upper sphere 
assumes a final position of equilibrium in which the net elec- 
trical force on it just balances its weight. For any smaller 
separation it exceeds the weight. But if we display these variations 
of force with distance, as in Fig. 5-7, we see a drastic difference. 
In the case of uncharged objects, the transition from negligible 
force to very large force is so abrupt that it supports our im- 
pression of a completely rigid object with a geometrically sharp 

Separation of centers, r 

Separation of centers. t 


151 Contact forces 

boundary and no interaction outside that boundary. Do not 
forget, however, that this is an idealization, and that sufficiently 
refined measurements would always reveal a continuous variation 
of force with separation. 


Fig.5-8 (a) Block 
on a rough horizontal 
table, subjected to a 
horizontal puli, P. 
{b) Qualitative graph 
of the frictional force, 
S, as afunclion ofP. 
The condiiion S = P 
can be satisfied up to 
the point at which 
S = nN. After that, 
the eguilibrium is 
bound to be broken. 

The discussion in the previous section has concentrated on 
contact forces called into play by the simple pushing together 
of two objects. Such forces are then at right angles to the surface 
of contact — we call them normal forces in the geometrical sense 
of that word. But much importance and interest attaches to the 
tangential forces of friction that appear when the attempt is 
made to drag an object sidcways along a surface. Figure 5-8(a) 
depicts a block resting on a horizontal surface; its weight is 
supported by a normal contact force N. We now apply a hori- 
zontal force P. Suppose that the magnitude of P is gradually 
increased from zero. At first nothing seems to happen ; the block 
remains still. We know, from our analysis of equilibrium situa- 
tions, that this means that a force equal and opposite to P is 
being supplied via the contact between the block and the surface. 
This is the frictional force, S. It automatically adjusts itself to 
balance P, just as the normal force N would automatically in- 
crease if we deliberately pushed down harder, in a vertical di- 
rection, on the top of the block. In both cases we can imagine 
minute deformations of the electric charge distributions along 
the interface, sufficient to develop the requisite forces. But then, 
when P is increased beyond a certain value, the frictional force S 
is no longer ablc to keep step with it. The equilibrium is broken 
down, and motion ensues. A graph of S against the applied 
force P might look like Fig. 5-8(b). Once S has been brought to 
its maximum limiting value, it may even drop at first as P is 

152 The various forces of naturc 

Fig. 5-9 (a) Force 
on a sphere in a 
flowing fluid. 
(b) Total force o f 
fluid friction is mode 
1 1 P ofseparate terms 
that are respectively 
linear and quadratic 
in the relativeflow 
celocity, v. 






-« — 



A v 

^ — 


further increased, although it tends to remain at a fairly constant 
value thereafter. However, the whole regime P > S corresponds 
to motion, and ff may depend in detail on the velocity. The only 
uniquely defined region is that of static equilibrium, throughout 
which we can put JF = P, as represented by the 45° line on the 
graph of Fig. 5-8(b). The other feature of interest is the empirical 
fact that the limiting value of £F is roughly proportional to the 
normal force N, so that their quotient — the coefficient of friction 
(n) — is a property of the two surfaces in contact: 

= 11N 


The above discussion applies to the contact of two solid 
surfaces. If the contact is lubricated, the behavior is very dif- 
ferent. One is then dealing, in effect, with the properties of the 
contact between a fluid (liquid or gas) and a solid. The basic 
properties of so-called fluid friction can be studied by measuring 
the force exerted on a fixed solid object as a stream of fluid is 
driven past it at a given speed d [see Fig. 5-9(a)]. Over a wide 
range of values of u, this fluid frictional resistance is well described 
by the following formula: 

R(v) = Ao + Bv 2 


where A and B are constants for a given object in a given fluid. 
The first term depends on the viscosity of the fluid, and the 
second is associated with the production of turbulence. Since 
the ratio of the second term to the first is proportional to v, one 
knows that at sufficiently high speeds the fluid friction is domi- 

153 Frictional contaci forces 

nated by turbulence, however small the ratio B/ 'A may be. The 
same consideration guarantees that at sufficiently low speeds the 
resistance will be dominated by the viscous term, directly propor- 
tional to o [see Fig. 5-9(b)]. 



In this chapter we have given a brief account of the three major 
types of physical interactions and have indicated the general 
areas in which they are dominant. To recapitulate: Nuclear 
forces are significant only for nuclear distances, the gravitational 
force is important only if objects of astronomical scale are in- 
volved, and nearly everything else ultimately depends on electro- 
magnetic interactions. The study of physics is essentially the 
attempt to understand these interactions and all their con- 
sequences. In mechanics we have, for the most part, the more 
modest goal of taking the forces as given and considering various 
dynamical situations in which they enter. We shall, however, be 
discussing two classic cases— gravitation and alpha-particle 
scattering — in which Newtonian mechanics provided the key to 
the basic laws of force. The present chapter has provided a kind 
of preview, because it summarizes the state of our current knowl- 
edge without entering into any detailed discussion of how we 
have come to know it. The real work lies ahead! 

5-1 At what distance from the earth, on the line from the earth to 
the sun, do the gravitational forces exerted on a mass by the earth 
and the sun become equal and opposite? Compare the result with 
the radius of the moon's orbit around the earth. 
5-2 By what angle, in seconds of are, will a plumbline be pulled out 
of its normal vertical direetion by the gravitational attraction of a 
10-ton truck that parks 20 ft away? Do you think that this effect 
could be detected ? 

5-3 In a Cavendish-type apparatus (see the figure) the large spheres 
are each 2 kg, the small spheres each 20 g. The length of the arm con- 
necting the small spheres is 20 cm, and the distance between the centers 
of a small sphere and the big sphere elose to it is 5 cm. The torsion 
constant of the suspending fiber is 5 X 10 -8 m-N/rad. The angular 
deflection of the suspended system is deduced from the displacement 

154 The various forces of naturc 


^20 g 

of a reflected spot of light on a scale 5 m away. (Remember that the 
change in direction of the reflected light is twice the angle through 
which the mirror is turned.) 

It is observed that when the large spheres are moved from their initial 
positions to equivalent positions on the other side (dashed lines) the 
mean position of the spot of light is shifted by 8 cm. 

(a) Deduce the value of G according to these data, ignoring the 
effect on each small sphere of the force due to the more distant of the 
larger spheres. 

(b) Estimate the percentage correction on the result of (a) re- 
quired to allow for the effect of the more distant spheres. 

5-4 The original Cavendish experiment was done with a large-size 
apparatus, as is natural if one wants to make the gravitational forces 
and torques as big as possible. However, this requires a strong, stiff 
wire to support the suspended masses. Much later (1895) C. V. Boys 
made a miniature apparatus, using thin fibers of fused quartz for the 
suspensions. It is an interesting exercise to see how the attainable 
sensitivity of the apparatus depends on its size. Imagine two versions 
of the Cavendish apparatus, A and B, both using solid lead spheres, 
in which the radii and separations of all the masses in B, together with 
the length of the torsion fiber, are scaled down by a certain factor L 
with respect to A. We then design for maximum sensitivity in each 
apparatus by using the thinnest possible torsion fiber that will take 
the weight of the suspended masses without breaking. Now for a 
torsion fiber of given material and of circular cross section, the maxi- 
mum supportable load is proportional to d 2 , where d is its diameter, 
and its torsion constant is proportional to d* /I, where / is its length. 
Using this information, compare the maximum angular deflections 
obtainable with the two different sizes of apparatus. (Remember, the 
lengths of the torsion fibers also differ by the scaling factor L.) 

5-5 The radius of the hydrogen atom according to the original Bohr 

155 Problems 

theory is 0.5 A. 

(a) What is the Coulomb force between the proton and the 
electron at this distance? What is the gravitational force? 

(b) How far apart must the proton and electron be for the 
Coulomb force to be equal to the value that the gravitational attrac- 
tion has at 0.5 A? What familiar astronomical distance is this com- 
parable to? 

5-6 Suppose electrons could be added to earth and moon until the 
Coulomb repulsion thus devcloped was of just the size to balance the 
gravitational attraction. What would be the smallest total mass of 
electrons that would achieve this? 

5-7 For a person living at 45° latitude, what is the approximate 
fractional difference, during the day, between the maximum and 
minimum gravitational forces due to the moon — the change resulting 
from the fact that the earth's rotation causes the person's distance 
from the moon to vary ? What is a manifestation of this kind of force 
effect in nature? 

5-8 You know that the Coulomb force and the gravitational force 
both obey an inverse-square law. Suppose that it were put to you 
that the origin of the gravitational force is a minute difference be- 
tween the natural unit of positive charge, as carried by a proton, and 
the natural unit of negative charge, as carried by an electron. Thus 
"neutral" matter, containing equal numbers of protons and electrons, 
would not be quite neutral in fact. 

(a) What fractional difference between the positive and negative 
elementary charges would lead to "gravitational" forces of the right 
magnitudo between lumps of ordinary "neutral" matter ? How could 
such a difference be looked for by laboratory experiments? 

(b) Is the theory tenable? 

5-9 (a) The text (p. 148) quotes a valuc of the nuclear force for two 
nucleons close together but also suggests that to describe the nuclear 
interactions in terms of forces is not very practical. Can you suggest 
any way in which a nuclear force as such could be measured? 

(b) According to one of the earliest and simplest theoretical 
descriptions of the nuclear interaction (by H. Yukawa) the force of 
attraction between two nucleons at large separation would be given by 

F( ,) = _d e -'"o 

where the distance r o is about 10~ 15 m and the constant A is about 
10" ' 1 N-m. At about what separation between a proton and a neutron 
would the nuclear force be equal to the gravitational force between 
these two particlcs? 

5-10 Can you think of any systems or processes in which gravita- 

156 The yarious forces of nature 




tional, electromagnetic, and nuclear forces all play an important role? 
5-11 As mentioned in the text, the attractive (long-range) part of the 
force between neutral molecules varies as l/r 7 . For a number of 
molecules, the order of magnitude of this van der Waals force is well 
represented by the equation 

F vw (r)~ -10- 76 A 7 

where F V w is in newtons and r in meters. Compare the magnitude of 
the van der Waals force with the Coulomb force between two ele- 
mentary charges [Eq. (5-2), with<?i = ?2 = e = 1.6 X 10~ C]: 

(a) For r = 4 A. (This is a distance about equal to the diameter 
of a molecule of oxygen or nitrogen and hence barely exceeding the 
closest approach of the centers of two such molecules in a collision.) 

(b) For a value of r corresponding to the mean distance between 
molecules in a gas at STP. 

5-12 One of the seemingly weakest forms of contact force is the 
surface tension of a liquid film. One of the seemingly strongest is the 
tensile force of a stretched metal wire. However, when expressed in 
terms of a force between individual atoms in contact, they do not 
look so different. Use the following data to evaluate them in these 

(a) If a water film is formed between a rectangular wire frame, 
3 in. wide, and a freely sliding transverse wire (see the figure), it takes 
the weight of about 1 g to prevent the film from contracting. This 
contractile force can be ascribed to the contact of the atoms lying 
within a monomolecular layer along each side of the film. Supposing 
that the molecules are 3 A across and closely packed, calculate the 
force per molecule. 

(b) A copper wire of 0.025-in. diameter was found to break 
when a weight of about 10 kg was hung from its lower end. First, 
calculate this breaking force in tons per square inch. If the fracture is 
assumed to involve the rupturing of the contacts between the atoms 
on the upper and lower sides of a horizontal section right across the 
wire, calculate the force per atom, assuming an atomic diameter of 
about 3 A. 

5-13 A time-honored trick method for approximately locating the 
midpoint of a long uniform rod or bar is to support it horizontally 
at any two arbitrary points on one's index fingers and then move the 
fingers together. (Of course, just finding its balance point on one 
finger alone works very well, too!) Explain the workings of the trick 
method, using your knowledge of the basic principles of static equi- 
librium and a property of frictional forces: that they have a maximum 
value equal to a constant /x (the coefficient of friction) times the com- 
ponent of force normal to the surface of contact between two objects. 

157 Problems 

5-14 (a) A string in tension is in contact with a circular rod (radius r) 
over an arc subtending a small angle A0 (see the figure). Show that 
the force with which the string presses radially inward on the pulley 
(and hence the normal force AN with which the pulley pushes on the 
string) is equal to TA9. 

(b) Hence show that the normal force per unit length is equal 
to T/r. This is a sort of pressure which, for a given value of T, gets 
bigger as r decreases. (This helps to explain why, when a string is 
tightly tied around a package, it cuts into the package most deeply 
as it passes around corners, where r is least.) 

(c) If the contact is not perfectly smooth, the values of the 
tension at the two ends of the arc can differ by a certain amount AF 
before slipping occurs. The value of AT is equal to y. AN, where n is 
the coeffkient of friction between string and rod. Deduce from this 
the exponential relation 

T(6) = T e 


where To is the tension applied at one end of an arbitrary arc (0) of 
string and T(6) is the tension at the other end. 

(d) The above result expresses the possibility of withstanding a 
large tension T in a rope by wrapping the rope around a cylinder, a 
phenomenon that has been exploited since time immemorial by sailors. 
Suppose, for example, that the value of n in the contact between a rope 
and a bollard on a dock is 0,2. For 7" = 100 lb, calculate the values 
of T corresponding to one, two, three and four complete turns of rope 
around the bollard. 

(It is interesting to note that T is proportional to To- This allows 
sailors to produce a big puli or not, at will, by having a rope passing 
around a continuously rotating motor-driven drum. The arrangement 
can be described as a force amplifier.) 

5-15 In a very dclicate torsion-balance experiment, such as the 
Cavendish experiment, the stray forces due to the fluid friction of slow 
air currents pushing on the suspended system may be quite significant. 
To make this quantitative, consider the gravity torsion-balance ex- 
periment described in Problem 5-3. For suspended spheres of the 
size stated (r « 0.8 cm), the force due to a flow of air of speed v is 
given approximately by the formula [Eg. (5-4)] 


R (newtons) = 2.5 X 10- 6 <; + 5 X 10 

where u is in m/sec. Calculate the value of v that would cause a force 
due to air currents that equaled the gravitational force exerted on the 
sphere in this experiment (i.e., the force exerted on a 20-g sphere by a 
2-kg sphere with their centcrs 5 cm apart). (Hint: Do not bother to 

158 The various forces of nature 

solve a quadratic equation for v. Just find the values of d for which 
the contributions to R, taken separately, would equal the gravitational 
force. The smaller of the two values of u so obtained is clearly already 
enough to spoil the experiment.) 

159 Probiems 

To tell us that every species of things is endowed with an 
occult specific quality by which it acts and produces manifest 
effects, is to tell us nothing. But to derive two or three 
general principles of motion from phenomena, and afterwards 
to tell us how the properties and actions of all corporeal 
things f ollow from those manifest principles, would be a 
very great step in Philosophy, t/wugh the causes of those 
principles were not yet discovered. 

newton, Opticks (1730) 

Force, inertia, and motion 


the preceding chapters have treated matter, motion, and force 
as separate topics. Now we come to the central problem of 
Newtonian dynamics: How are motions of material objects 
affected by forces? We shall preface this with a question that is, 
on the face of it, much simpler: What can we say about the 
motion of an object that is subjected to no forces? It was in the 
analysis of this problem by Galileo that the science of dynamics 
really began. ] 

We saw in Chapter 4 how the study of static cquilibrium 
situations leads us to a basic principle: For an object at rest, the 
net force aeting is zero. What could be more natural than to 
turn this statement around and infer that, if the net force on 
an object is zero, the object must remain at rest — and, as a kind 
of corollary to this, to conclude that in order to keep an object 
moving a net force must bc maintained. After all, our experience 

>You will undoubtedly have solved many problems in the use of Newton's 
laws before rcading this chapter. Do not, on that account, assume that the 
following diseussion is superfluous. A wish to get down to business — 
writing equations and using them — is very sound. The quantitative use of a 
physical theory is an essential part of the game; physics is not a spectator 
sport. But to gain real insight and understanding — Where do the equations 
come from? What do they really say? — one must also examine the basic 
assumptions and phenomena. And some of the greatest advances in physics 
have come about in just this way. Einstein arrived at special relativity by 
thinking deeply about the nature of time. And Newton, when asked once 
about how he gained his insight into the problems of nature, replied "By 
constantly thinking unto them." 


Fig. 6-1 Limitalions on in- 
ertial molion at the earth's 
surface. An object starling oul 
horizontally in a Iruly straight 
line at A mighl end up on a 
hilttop at B. In the process it 
would be bound to slow down. 

shows that moving objects on the earth's surface do come to 
rest if left to themselves, and a continuing effort does have to 
be applied to keep an object moving steadily. But, as Galileo was 
the first to realize, an extrapolation beyond the range of ordinary 
experience is possible; it is expressed in his principle of inertia. 
Initially, this simply asserted that an object would, if free of all 
resistive forces, continue with unchanging speed on a horizontal 
plane. Galileo himself recognized that this assertion is true only 
in a limited sense. For a truly flat horizontal plane is tangent 
to the earth's surface; therefore, if extended far enough, it must 
be seen as going perceptibly up hill (Fig. 6-1), and objects 
traveling outward along it must ultimately slow down. ' 

Subsequently Isaac Newton stated the principle of inertia in 
a generalized form in his "first law" of motion as presented in 
the Principia: "Every body perseveres in its state of rest, or of 
uniform motion in a right line, unless it is compelled to change 
that state by forces impressed upon it." It is a familiar statement, 
which we probably all learn in our first encounter with me- 
chanics, and Fig. 6-2 shows a practical illustration of it. But 
what does it really say? The first thing we must recognize is 
that, as discussed in Chapter 2, every statement about the motion 
of a given object involves a physical frame of reference; we can 
only measure displacements and velocities with respect to other 
objects. Thus the principle of inertia is not just a clear-cut 
statement about the behavior of individual objects; it goes much 
deeper than that. We can, in faet, turn it around and make a 
statement that goes roughly as follows: 

There exist certain frames of reference with respect to which the 
motion of an object, free of all external forces, is a motion in a 
straight line at constant velocity (including zero). 

■For Galileo's own diseussion of these matters, see his Dialogues Concerning 
Two New Sciences (H. Crew and A. de Salvio, translators), Dover Publica- 
tions, New York. 

162 Force, inertia, and motion 

Fig. 6-2 A motion al conslanl velocity — a bullet 
traveling at about 1,500 J 1 /sec, photographed strobo- 
scopically at 30,000 flashes/sec. (Photograph by Prof. 
Harold E. Edgerton, M. I. T.) 

A reference frame in which the law of inertia holds good 
is called an inertial frame, and the question as to whether a 
given frame of reference is inertial then becomes a matter for 
observation and experiment. Most observations made within 
the confines of a laboratory on the earth's surface suggest that a 
frame of reference attached to that laboratory is suitable. After 
all, it was on the strength of observations within such a frame 
that Galileo arrived at the principle of inertia in the first place! 
A more critical seruti ny shows that this is not quite good enough, 
and we need to look further afield — but we shall do that later. 
For the moment we shall limit ourselves to introducing the main 
principle, which is not affected by the later refinements. 

Sir Arthur Eddington, who had a flair for making comments 
that were both penetrating and witty, offered his own version 
of the principle of inertia: "Every body continues in its state 
of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, except insofar as 
it doesn't." 1 In other words, he regarded it as being, in the last 

'A. S. Eddington, The Nalure o/ the Physical World (Ann Arbor Paperbacks), 
University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1958. 

163 The principle of inertia 

analysis, an expendable proposition. (He was paving the way for 
a discussion of general relativity and gravitation.) This remark 
of Eddington's nevertheless draws attention, in a colorful way, 
to what is the very foundation of Newtonian mechanics: Any 
deviation from a straight-line path is taken to imply the existence 
of a force. No deviation, no force — and vice versa. It must be 
recognized that we cannot "prove" the principle of inertia by 
an experimental test, because we can never be sure that the object 
under test is truly free of all external interactions, such as those 
due to extremely massive objects at very large distances. More- 
over, there is the far from trivial question of defining a straight 
line in a real physical sense: it is certainly not intuitively obvious, 
nor is it an abstract mathematical question. (How would you 
define a straight line for this purpose?) Nevertheless, it can be 
claimed that the principle of inertia is a valid generalization 
from experience; it is a possible interpretation of observed 
motions, and our belief in its validity grows with the number 
of phenomena one can correlate successfully with its help. 


The law of inertia implies that the "natural" state of motion 
of an object is a state of constant velocity. Closely linked to 
this is the recognition that the effect of an interaction between 
an object and an external physical system is to change the state 
of motion. For example, we havc no doubt that the motion of a 
tennis ball is affected by the racket, that the motion of a compass 
needle is affected by a magnet, and that the motion of the earth 
is affected by the sun. "Inertial mass" is the technical phrase 
for that property which determines how difficult it is for a given 
applied force to change the state of motion of an object. Let us 
consider how this description of things can be made quantitative. 
"Force" is an abstract term, but we have seen how to asso- 
ciate it with practical operations such as compressing springs, 
stretching rubber bands, and so on. We can readily study the 
effect of pushing or pulling on an object by such means, using 
forces of definite magnitude. The observations become par- 
ticularly clear-cut if we apply a force to an object that would 
otherwise move with constant velocity. A very close approxima- 
tion to this ideal can be obtained by supporting a flat-bottomed 
object on a cushion of gas— for example by placing the object on 

164 Force, inertia, and motion 

I 3 I 4 I 



Fig. 6-3 (a) Strobo- 
scopic pholograpli of 
a uniformly accel- 
eraled molion. The 
time interval between 
Hght flashes was £ 
sec. (From PSSC 
Physics, D. C. Heath, 
Lexington, Massa- 
chuselts, 1960.) 
(b) Simple dynamical 
experimenls ihat can 
be used as a basis for 
deoeloping Newton' s 
second law. 

2 springs 


1 block 

1 block 

1 spring 



Acceleration = « a ° 

a horizontal table pierced with holes through which air is blown 
from below. It is then possible to puli horizontally on the object 
and make such observations as the following (see also Fig. 6-3): 

1. A spring, stretched by a constant amount, causes the 
velocity of the object to change linearly with time — the accelera- 
tion produced in a given object by a given force is constant. 

2. If a second spring, identical with the first and stretch- 
by the same amount, is used side by side with the first, the ac- 
celeration is doubled. That is, if we take a known multiple of a 
force, according to our criteria for comparing forccs in static 
equilibrium (see Chapter 4), then the acceleration produced in a 
given object is directly proportional to the total force. 

It thus becomes possible to write down simple equations 
expressing the relation betwccn forces F and accelerations a: 

165 Force and ineriial mass: Newton's law 

a = kF 


F= k'a 

where k and k' describc thc inertial properties of the particular 
object. Which of the above two statements of the results is more 
convenient? We find the answer in another simple experiment: 

3. If we place on the first object a second, identical object, 
it is observed that all accelerations produced by given arrange- 
ments of the springs are rcduced to half of what was obtained 
with one object alone. We can express this most easily by choos- 
ing the second of the above equations, so that the inertial property 
is additive — i.e., the inertial constants k' of two different objects 
can be simply added together, and the acceleration of the com- 
bined system under a given force is immediately given by 

F = (Ar'i + k' 2 )a l+2 

1+2 fci + JG 

It is by such steps that one can be led to the equation that 
is universally known as "Newton's (second) law": 

F = ma ■= m— (6-1 ) 


where the proportionality factor m (identical with k' as defined 
above) is called the inertial mass of the object and F is the net 
force acting on it. Embodied in this basic statement of Newton's 
law is the feature that force and acceleration are vector quan- 
tities and that the acceleration is always in the same direction as 
the net force. 

An interesting historical fact, often overlooked, is that 
Newton's own statement of the basic law of mechanics was nol 
in the form of Eq. (6-1); the equation F = ma appears nowhere 
in the Principia. Instead, Newton spoke of the change of 
"motion" (by which he meant momentum) and related this to 
the value of force X time. In other words, Newton's version 
of the second law of motion was essentially the following: 

FAt = mAo (6-2) 

166 Force, inertia, and motion 

We shall see in Chapter 9 that Newton's way of formulating the 
law grew, by inference, out of the particular kind of evidence 
available to him: the consequences of collision processes. Direct 
experiments of the kind illustrated in Fig. 6-3 were not possible 
with the limited techniques of Newton's day. (The only type 
of uniformly accelerated motion easily accessible to Newton was 
that of motion under gravity, but this, of course, did not allow 
any independent control over the value of F applied to a given 
object — unless the use of an inclined plane, giving a driving force 
mg sin 6, is regarded as fulfilling this purpose.) 


Sitnple and familiar as Eq. (6-1) is, it nevertheless contains an 
enormous wealth of physical concepts — indeed, almost the whole 
basis of classical dynamics. First comes the assumption that 
quantitative measurements of displacements and time intervals 
lead us to a unique value of the acceleration of an object at a 
given instant. If we remind ourselves that displacements can 
only be measured with respect to other physical objects, we see 
that this, like the principle of inertia, cannot be separated from 
the choice of reference frame. In fact, we tacitly assume that the 
frame in which the acceleration is measured is an inertial frame. 
For the kinds of basic experiments illustrated in Fig. 6-3, the 
earth fills this role. 

Next comes the feature, already emphasized, that the ac- 
celeration vector is in the direction of the net force vector. This 
is an important result; it is an expression of the fact that the 
accelerative effects of several different forces combine in a linear 
way. Suppose, for example, that an object has two springs 
attached to it [see Fig. 6-4(a)]. Spring 1 exerts on the object a 
force Fi in the x direction. Acting alone it would produce an 
acceleration F t /m along x. Spring 2 exerts a force F 2 i n the y 
direction. Acting alone it would produce an acceleration F-i/m 
along y. It is then a matter of experiment — not predictable by 
pure logic — that the acceleration caused by the two springs 
acting together is just what one would calculate by adding the 
vectors Fi and F 2 to form a resultant force F [Fig. 6-4(b)] and 
applying this single force to the mass [Fig. 6-4(c)]. The observed 
acceleration a is equal to F/m. This result provides the dynamical 
basis for the "independence of motions" that we discusscd as a 
purely kinematic effect in the trajectory problem of Chapter 3. 
It tells us that the instantaneous acceleration of an object is the 

167 Some comments on Newton's law 

Fig. 6-4 (a) Object pulled by two springs in perpendic- 
ular directions. (b) Resultan! force calculated according 
to Ihe laws ofveclor addUion. (c) Obserced acceleralion 
ofthe objecl agrees With lhal due lo the net force cector 
as found in (b). 

consequence of a linear superposilion of the applied forces or of 
the accelerations that they would individually produce. If this 
resiilt did not hold, the prediction and analysis of motions as 
produced by forces would become vastly more complicated and 

Let us add a word of explanation and caution here. The 
linear superposition of instantaneous components of acceleration 
does not mean that we can always automatically proceed to 
calculate, let us say, the whole course of development of the y 
component of an object's motion without reference to what is 
happening in the x direction. To take an example that we shall 
consider in more detail later, if a charged particle is moving in a 
magnetic field, the component of force in a given direction de- 
pends on the component of velocity perpendicular to that direc- 
tion. In such a case, we have to keep traek of the way in which 
that perpendicular velocity component changes as time goes on. 

In the case of an object subjected to a single force, one may 
be tempted to think that it is intuitively obvious that the ac- 
celeration is in the same direction as the force. It may be worth 
pointing out, therefore, that this is not in general true if high- 
velocity particles are involved — sufficiently fast to require the 
modified kinematies and dynamics of special relativity. ' 

Finally comes the assertion that a given force, applied to a 
particular object, causes the velocity of that object to change 
at a certain rate a, the magnitude of which depends only on the 

■See, for example, the volume Special Relatioity in this series. 

168 Force, inertia, and motion 

Fig. 6-5 Increase of i 
inertial mass with 
speed, as revealed in 
experiments on high- 
speed electrons. 
Based on data of 
(open circles) Kauf- 
mann (1910), (filled 
circles) Bucherer 
(1909), and (crosses) 
Guye and Lauanchy 
(1915). (AflerR.S. 
Shankland, Atomic 
and Nuclear Physics, 
Macmillan, New 
York, 1961.) 

magnitude and direction of F and on a single scalar quantity 
characteristic of the object — its inertial mass m. This is a very 
remarkable result; let us consider it further. 

Newton's law asserts that the acceleration produced by any 
constarit force, as for example by a stretched spring, has the 
same value under all conditions. Thus, according to this state- 
ment, it does not matter whether the object is initially stationary 
or is traveling at high speed. Is this alvvays, and universally true? 
No! It turns out that for extremely high speeds — speeds that 
are a significant fraction of the speed of light — the acceleration 
produced by a given force on a given object does depend on v. 
Under these high-speed conditions Newton's mechanics gives 
way to Einstein's, as described by the special theory of relativity: 
The inertia of a given object increases systematically with speed 
according to the formula 

m(o) = 

(1 - oVc2)" 2 


This relation is shown in Fig. 6-5, with experimental data that 
substantiate it. The quantity m Q , which is called the "rest mass" 
of the object, represents what we can simply call the inertial mass 
in all situations to which classical mechanics applies, because 
for any v « c the value of m according to Eq. (6-3) is inap- 
preciably different from m . 

Another implication of Newton's law, as expressed by Eq. 
(6-1), is that the basic dynamics of an object subjected to a 
given force does not depend on d 2 v/dt 2 or on any of the higher 
time derivatives of the velocity. The absence of any such com- 

169 Some comments on Newton's law 

plication is in itself a remarkable result, which as far as we know 
continues to hold good even in the "relativistic" region of very 
high velocities. It has, however, been pointed out that if one 
considers physiological effects, not just the basic physics, the 
existence and magnitude of d 2 o/dt 2 (= da/dt) can be important. 
We all know the good feeling of a "smooth acceleration" in a 
car, and what we mean by that phrase is an acceleration that is 
close to being constant. A rapid rate of change of acceleration 
produces great discomfort, and it has even been suggested that a 
unit of da/dt — to be called a "jerk" — should be introduced as 
a quantitative measure of such effects! 

The conclusion that we can draw from the above discussion 
is that Newton's law, although ultimately limited in its applica- 
tion, does express with insignificantly small error the relation 
between the acceleration of an object and the force acting on it 
for almost everything outside the realm of high-speed atomic 


Granted that a given force produces a unique acceleration of a 
given object, we can then apply this same force to different 
objects. Such observations can be used to establish quantitative 
scales for measuring both inertial masses and forces. In taking 
this step, we adopt Newton's law as the central feature of me- 
chanics. Although we have hitherto used static situations to 
compare forces with one another, we now turn to dynamics for 
defining the absolute magnitudes of forces in terms of the motions 
they produce. This also means that instead of relying on static 
measurements to give us prior knowledge of the magnitude of a 
force, we accept the idea that Newton's law can be used as an 
analytical tool for deducing the force from the observed ac- 
celeration that it produces. Because the measures of force and 
inertial mass are linked in the single equation F = ma, there is 
danger of circularity in our definitions. But we shall not delve 
into the subtleties of this problem; we shall simply present a 
pragmatic method of establishing scales of measures for these 

Our observations permit us to assume that every time a 
given spring is stretched to the same elongation, it exerts the 
same magnitude of force on an object attached to it — for we 

170 Force, inertia, and motion 

observe a reproducible acceleration. We can then take a number 
of different objects, labeled 1, 2, 3, ... , puli them one at a time 
with the same force (i.e., our spring stretched to the same elon- 

gation) and measure the individual accelerations : a x , a 2 , a 3 , 

We can use these experimental results to define an inertial mass 
scale because we can put 

F = m\a\ = «12^2 = W3<33 - • • 


m\ fl2 W!l fl3 

One particular object (e.g., m,) can be chosen (arbitrarily) as a 
Standard unit mass called a "kilogram." A quantitative measure 
of all other inertial masses can then be obtained in terms of the 
Standard object. Originally, the kilogram was defined to be the 
mass of 1000 cm 3 of water at its temperature of maximum 
density (about 4°C), but it is now the mass of a particular cylinder 
of platinum-iridium alloy, kept at the International Bureau of 
Weights and Measures in Sevres, France. (This object was in- 
tended to be exactly equivalent to the liter of water, but when a 
small discrepancy was discovered it was decided to switch to the 
metal Standard as being generally superior in terms of durability, 
reproducibility, and convenience.) 

If the inertial mass is truly a property of the object alone, 
then the ratios (6-4) must be independent of the particular force 
used. Repeating the procedure with a spring extended by a 
different amount and hence with different accelerations, one 
finds experimentally that the mass ratios are the same as before. 
The fact that these experimentally determined mass ratios are 
independent of the magnitude of the force establishes the inertial 
mass as a characteristic property of the object. 

Our quantitative scale for forces likewise stems from New- 
ton's law once the scale of inertial masses has been established, 
so that in the MKS system, as we mentioned in our first dis- 
cussion of forces in Chapter 4, the unit force (the newtori) is 
defined as the force that imparts to 1 kg an acceleration of 
1 m/sec 2 : 

1 N = 1 kg-m/sec 2 
Dynamical units of force in other systems of measurement can 

171 Scales of mass and force 

be defined in an exactly similar way, A newton, as we noted in 
Chapter 4, is about equal to the gravitational force on an apple, 
i.e., on a mass of a few ounces. 

In describing the kinds of simple experiments on which the 
formulation of F = ma might be based, we introduced the result 
that the inertial property represented by mass is additive. You 
may be tempted to feel that this is obvious and not worthy of an 
experimental test. As far as ordinary objects are concerned, this 
commonsense reaction to the problem is sound. But just to 
recognize that there is, in principle, a legitimate question here, 
imagine that we have measured the inertial masses of a proton 
and an electron, separately, and that we then let them come 
together to form a hydrogen atom. Is the inertial mass of the 
atom equal to the sum of the masses of the electron and proton? 
No; it is a shade less. Why? Because in the formation of the 
atom, with the binding together of the proton and electron, the 
equivalent of a tiny amount of mass escapes in the form of 
radiation. Conversely, if an object is made up of various parts 
held together by cohesive forces, so that effort has to be supplied 
to separate it into those parts, then the sum of the masses of the 
individual parts is greater than the mass of the original object. 
For ordinary objects the difference is immeasurably small, but 
in atomic and nuclear systems it can become a significant feature 
of the total mass, and provides the basis of calculations on the 
energy of nuclear reactions, etc. 

Returning now to the observed additivity of inertial masses 
for macroscopic objects, we can see that this property fully 
justifies the procedure of making a set of Standard masses by 
constructing blocks of a given material with their volumes in 
simple numerical ratios — e. g., 1 :2:5: 10 .... This proportion- 
ality of mass to volume was taken by Newton himself as basic, 
embodying the concept of a constant density for a given material. 
The very first sentence in the Principia is, in fact, a definition 
of mass as the product of density and volume — a definition that 
has drawn heavy fire, because some critics regard it as circular. 
"How," they say, "can one define density except as the quotient 
of mass and volume?" But Newton had a picture of solid matter 
as built up of small particles packed together in a uniform 
manner, and it probably seemed to him more logical to take this 
inner structure as primary. The calculation of the mass of a 
lump of matter would then be in essence a matter of counting 
the number of particles that it contained and multiplying by the 
mass of a single particle. 

172 Force, inertia, and motion 


Our main concern in this chapter and the next is with the in- 
stantaneous effect of a force. Let us, however, take a first look 
at a question that will be the subject of very extensive analysis 
later in the book. This question is: What is the effect of a force 
that is applied to an object and maintained for a while? You 
are no doubt aware that the answer to this question can be given 
in more than one way, depending on whether we consider the 
time or the distance over which the force is applied. To take the 
simplest possible case, let us suppose that a constant force F is 
applied to an object of mass m that is at rest at time zero. Then 
we have F = ma, defining a constant acceleration. The resulting 
motion is thus deseribed by the most elementary versions of the 
kinematic equations: 

d = at 

x = \ttfi 

At time t the object has traveled a total distance x, and we can 
caleulate two possible measures of the total effect of F: 

Ft = mat = mv 

Fx = (ma)$at 2 ) = %mv 2 

Thus we arrive at the two primary dynamical properties that we 
associate with a moving object: its momentum and its kinetic 

The effect of F as measured by the produet Ft is called its 
impulse; the effect of F as measured by the produet Fx is of course 
what we call work. The quantitative measures of Ft and Fx are 
newton-seconds and newton-meters. The former, which defines 
our measure of momentum, does not have a special unit named 
in its honor. The latter, however, is expressed in terms of the 
basic unit of work or energy in the MKS system — the joule. 
Thus we have 

impulse — * momentum in N-sec = kg-m/sec 
work > kinelic energy in N-m = joules 


We have emphasized how the experimental basis of Newton's 
law involves the observation of motions with respect to an inertial 

173 The invariance o\' Newton's law; relativity 

Fig. 6-6 Molion of 
a particle P referred 
to iwoframes that 
have a relatiue 
uelocity v. 

frame of reference. The actual appearance of a given motion 
will vary from one such frame to another. It is worth seeing, 
therefore, how the dynamical conclusions are independent of the 
particular choice of frame — which means that Newton's me- 
chanics embodies a principle of relativity. 

The first point to establish is that, if we have identified any 
one inertial frame, S (i.e., a frame in which an object under no 
forces moves uniformly in a straight line), then any other frame, 
S', having a constant velocity relative to the first is also an inertial 
frame. This follows directly from the fact that if an object has the 
instantaneous velocity u in S, and if the velocity of S' relative to 
S is v, then the instantaneous velocity of the object relative to S' 
is given (see Chapter 2) by 

Thus if u and v are constant velocities, so also is u', and the 
object will obey the law of inertia as observed in S'. 

To discuss the problem further, let us set up rectangular 
coordinate systems in both frames, with their x axcs along the 
direction of the velocity v (see Fig. 6-6). Let the origins O and 
O' of the two systems be chosen to coincide at t — 0, at which 
instant, also, the y and z axes of S' coincide with those of S. 
Let a moving object be at the point P at a later time, /, when the 
origin O' has moved a distance vt along the x axis of S. Then 
the coordinates of P in the two systems are related by the follow- 
ing equations. (It is appropriate, in view of Galileo's pioneer 
work in kinematics and especially of his clear statement of the 
law of inertia, that they should have become known as the 
Galilean transformations.) 

174 Force, inertia, and molion 

(Galilean transformalion: 

x' = X - 

- vt 


= const.) 

S' moves relative to S with | 

L' =y 


a constant speed u in the 

z' = z 

-\-x direction) | 

r' = r 

The last of these equations expresses the Newtonian assumption 
of a universal, absolute flow of time, but it also embodies the 
specific convention that the zero of time is taken to be the same 
instant in both frames of reference, so that all the clocks in both 
frames agree with one another. 

We can then proceed to obtain relationships between the 
components of an instantaneous velocity as measured in the two 
frames. Thus for the x components we have 

, dx' dx 

** = -d7 u ' = 'di 

Putting x' = x — vi, and dt' = dt, we have 

d , ^ 

u' z = — (x — vt) = u, - v 


The transformations of all three components of velocity are as 

u' x = u x — v 

u' y = u„ (6-6) 

«'s = "z 

Finally, diflferentiating these velocity components with respect to 
time, we have (for v = const.) three equalities involving the 
components of acceleration: 

du' x 

du x 

dUy dUy 

du' z 

du z 



dt' dt 



Thus the measure of any acceleration is the same in both frames: 
a' = a (6-7) 

Since this identity holds for any two inertial frames, whatever 
their relative velocity, we say that the acceleration is an invariant 
in classical mechanics. This result is the central feature of 
relativity in Newtonian dynamics (and it ceases to hold good in 
the description of motion according to special relativity). 

To illustrate the application of these ideas, consider the 

175 The invariancc of Ncwton's law: relativity 

Fig. 6-7 Two dif- 
ferent views of the 
trajectory of an object 
after it has been 
released from rest 
with respect to a 
moving frame. S'. 

ide released 
from rest 
i n .V frame 


Frame S 

Frame S' 

simple and familiar example of a particle falling freely under 
gravity. Suppose that at t = 0, when the axes of the systems 
5 and S' are coincident, an experimenter in S' drops a particle 
from rest in this frame. The trajectories of the particle, as seen 
in S and 5', are plotted in Fig. 6-7. In each frame the particle 
is observed to follow the expected trajectory according to the 
kinematic equations with a vertical acceleration g. In the S 
frame, the particle has an initial horizontal velocity and therefore 
it follows a parabolic path, whereas in S' the particle, under the 
aetion of gravity, falls straight down. Observers in these two 
different frames would agree that the equation F = ma, where 
they use the same F, accounts properly for the trajectories for 
any particle launehed in any manner in either frame. The frames 
are thus equivalent as far as dynamical experiments are con- 
cerned — either frame may be assumed stationary and the other 
frame in motion, with the same laws of mechanies providing 
correct explanations from the observed motions. This is a simple 
example of the invariance of Newton's law itself. 


In this seetion we shall consider a little more carefully what is 
involved in a transformation of Newton's second law of motion. 
What do we mean by a transformation of this law? Unless we 
have an explicit law of foree, F = ma can be regarded as only 
a preseription for deducing F from the observed motions. So let 
us consider the foree provided by the interaetion between two 
objects. Suppose, for simplicity, that the interaetion is provided 
by something like a stretehed rubber band, so that the foree is 
a funetion only of the distance r between the objects; i.e., we 
can put F = f (r). For further simplicity, let us assume that the 

'This seetion can be omitted without loss of continuity. 

176 Foree, inertia. and motion 

motion is confined to the x axis. Then the force exerted on 
object 2 by object I , as measured in frame S, can be written : 

F12 =/(*2- *i) (6-8) 

Newton's law, as applied to object 2, is then stated as follows in 
terms of measurements in S alone: 

F 12 = f(x? — x\) = /M2fl2 (6-9) 

We shall now rewrite this equation so that it is expressed 
entirely in terms of measurements made in the frame S'. From 
Eq. (6-5) we have 

X2 - Xi = (X2 + vl) - (x[ + ot) = x 2 - x\ 

Fl2 = f(X2 ~ X[) 

but according to the assumed law of force, the function 
f(x' 2 — x[) is precisely the specification of the force F i2 in 
terms of measurements in S'. Hence we can put 

Fl2 = F\2 

Turning now to the right-hand side of Eq. (6-9), the Galilean 
transformations give us a = a'; and in Newtonian dynamics the 
inertial mass is a constant: m 2 = m'i. Thus we are able to write 

F[ 2 = f(x 2 - x\) = m' 2 a 2 (6-10) 

We see here in explicit terms how the Newtonian law of 
motion is invariant with respect to the particular choice of 
inertial frame, provided that the Galilean transformations cor- 
rectly describe the transformations of displacements and times 
between one frame and another. A more complicated force law, 
as long as it involved only the relative positions and velocities 
of two interacting objects, would possess this same property of 
invariance. If, however, the force depended on absolute positions 
and velocities — e.g., if the force law were of the form 

F12 = f(xl - x?) 

then the form of the equation of motion would cease to be the 
same in all inertial frames. Nothing in our experience has re- 
vealed such a situation, which would make the laws of physics 

177 Invariance with Specific force laws 

appear different in a laboratory and in a train or plane moving 
at constant velocity. If the physical laws were different for 
different observers, this might be a clue to the uniqueness of 
certain frames of reference. It was, indeed, believed for a long 
time that a unique reference frame must exist, in the form of a 
medium, pervading space, in which the waves of light could be 
carried. (Otherwise, how could light travel from the stars to the 
earth?) But Einstein showed how the equivalence of all inertial 
frames and the invariance of all physical laws could be pre- 
served, provided that the kinematics of Galileo and the dynamics 
of Newton were replaced by ncw formulations that merged into 
the old ones in the region of moderate or small velocities. 


The subject of this section might be more dramatically, although 
less accurately, stated as a question: Is time reversible? Look 
at the two stroboscopic photographs in Fig. 6-8. The first shows 
an individual object moving vertically under gravity. Is it falling 
down or "falling up"? The second shows a collision between 
two objects. Which were the paths of the objects before collision? 
In both cases the answer must be "We don't know." A motion 
picture of these two sequences of events could be run backward 
and it would be impossible for the viewer to detect any violation 
of Newton's laws. The reason is that all velocities of a collection 
of particles can be reversed without violating Newton's law of 
motion. A time-reoersal operation (replacing t by — t in the 
kinematical equations) changes every u to -v, but it leaves the 
acceleration unchanged. (Gravity, for example, remains in 
the downward direction.) This is because acceleration involves 
the second derivative with respect to time. Thus any conclusions 
about forces that we reach as a result of watching a dynamical 
process in reverse sequcnce are identical with what we would 
conclude from the process itself. We do not see attractions 
apparently turn into repulsions, or anything like that. 

And yet, when we see an ordinary motion picture in reverse, 
it quickly becomes apparent from the behavior of inanimate 
objects — leaving aside the ludicrous effects of reversing human 
actions, which appear strange for quite different reasons — that 
most physical actions havc a well-defined direction. Imagine, for 
example, a sequence in which a glass falls from a table and 
shatters into small fragments on the floor. If wc saw a motion 

178 Force, inertia, and motion 




l j 





Fig. 6-8 (a) Strohoscopic photograph ofan object 
moving vertically under gravily. Which way is i t moving — 
up, or down? (b) Slroboscopic photograph ofan elaslic 
collision. lis time sequence is lo all intents and purposes 
completely reversible. (From PSSC Physics, D. C. 
Heath, Lexinglon, Massachusells, 1965.) 

179 Ncwton's law and time reversal 

picture in which the fragments gathered themselves together into 
a whole glass, which then jumped up onto the table, this would 
clearly be unbelievable— nature doesn't act like that. Yet a 
"micromovie" of the individual atomic encounters at every stage 
of the process ought to be perfectly time-reversible. 

Thus we are faced with a puzzle: Newton's law implies that 
the fundamental dynamical behavior of an individual particle is 
reversible in time, but when one takes a system of very large 
numbers of particlcs, apparently the behavior ceases to be time- 
reversible. The resolution of this mystery is found in the detailed 
statistical analysis of many-particle systems — the subject known 
as statistical mechanics. As long as we are dealing, as we shall 
be here, with systems of only a few particles, the problems 
associated with time rcvcrsal do not arise and we shall not con- 
sider them further. 


It will probably have become apparent to you during the course 
of this chapter that the foundation of classical mechanics, as 
represented by Newton's second law, is a complex and in many 
respects subtle matter. The precise content of the law is still a 
matter for debate, nearly three centuries after Newton stated 
the first version of it. In a fine diseussion entitled "The Origin " 
and Nature of Newton's Laws of Motion," one author (Brian 
Ellis) says: "But what of Newton's second law of motion? What 
is the logical status of this law? Is it a definition of foree? Of 
mass? Or is it an empirical proposition relating foree, mass, and 
acceleration?" 1 Ellis argucs that it is something of all of these: 

Consider how Newton's second law is actually used. In some 
fields it is unqueslionably truc that Newton's second law is used 
to define a seale of foree. How else, for example, can we mea- 
sure interplanetary gravitational forees? But it is also un- 
questionably true that Newton's second law is sometimes used 
to define a scale of mass. Consider, for example, the use of the 
mass spectrograph. And in yet other fields, where foree, mass, 
and acceleration are all easily and independently measurable, 
Newton's second law of motion funetions as an empirical cor- 
relation between these three quantities. Consider, for example, 

'Published in a colleclion of essays, Beyond the Edge ofCeriainly (Robert G. 
Colodny, ed.), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1965. 

180 Foree, inertia, and motion 


the application of Newton 's second law in ballistics and rock- 
etry . . . To suppose that Newton's second law of motion, or 
any law for that matter, must have a unique role that we can 
describe generally and call the logical status is an unfounded 
and unjustifiable supposition. 

Since forcc and mass are both abstract concepts and not 
objective realities, we might conceive of a description of nature 
in which we dispensed with both of them. But, as one physicist 
(D. H. Frisch) has remarked, "Whatever we think about ultimate 
reality it is convenient to follow Newton and split the description 
of our observations into 'forces,' which are what make masses 
accelerate, and 'masses,' which are what forces make accelerate. 
This would be just tautology were it not that the observed phe- 
nomena can best be classified as the result of different forces 
acting on the sameset of masses." Ellis spells out this same idea 
in more detail : 

Now there are, in fact, many and various procedures by which 
the magnitudes of the individual forces acting on a given system 
may be determined — electrostatic forces by charge and distance 
measurements, elastic forces by measurement of strain, magnetic 
forces by current and distance determinations, gravitational 
forces by mass and distance measurements, and so on. And it is 
an empirical fact that when all such foree measurements are 
made and the magnitude of the resultant foree determined, then 
the rate of change of momentum of the system under considera- 
tion is found to be proportional to the magnitude of this re- 
sultant foree. 

And so it is that we obtain an immensely fruitful and accurate 
description of a very large part of our whole experience of 
objects in motion, through the simple and compaet statement 
of Newton's second law. ' 

6-1 Make a graphical analysis of the data represented by the strobo- 
scopic photograph of Fig. 6-2(a) to test whether this is indeed ac- 
celeration under a constant foree. 

J For further diseussion of these questions, the American Journal of Physics 
is a perennial source. See, for example, the following artieles: L. Eisenbud, 
"On the Ciassical Laws of Motion," Am. J. P/iys., 26, 144 (1958); N. Austern, 
"Presentation of Newtonian Mechanics," Am. J. Phys., 29, 617 (1961); 
R. Weinstock, "Laws of Ciassical Motion: What's F? What's ml What's 
a?", Am. J. Phys., 29, 698 (1961). 

181 Problem-, 

6-2 A cabin cruiser of mass 15 metric tons drifts in toward a dock 
at a speed of 0.3 m/scc after its engines have been cut. (A metric ton 
is 10 :i kg.) A man on the dock is able to touch the boat when it is 1 m 
from the dock, and thereafter he pushes on it with a force of 700 N to 
try to stop it. Can he bring the boat to rest before it touches the dock? 

6-3 (a) A man of mass 80 kg jumps down to a concrete patio from 
a window ledge only 0.5 m above the ground. He neglects to bend 
his knees on landing, so that his motion is arrested in a distance of 
about 2 cm. With what average force does this jar his bone structure ? 
(b) If the man jumps from a ledge 1.5 m above the ground but 
bends his knees so that his centcr of gravity descends an additional 
distance h after his feet touch the ground, what must h be so that the 
average force exerted on him by the ground is only three times his 
normal weight ? 

6-4 An object of mass 2 kg is acled upon by the following combina- 
tion of forces in the xy plane: 5 N at 6 = 0, 10 N at 6 = jt/4, and 
20 N at 8 = 47r/3. The direction 6 = corresponds to the +x direc- 
tion. At t = the object is at the point j;=-6m and y = 3 m and has 
velocity components v x = 2 m/sec and v y = 4 m/sec. Find the 
object's velocity and position at t = 2 sec. 

6-5 The graphs shown give information regarding the motion in the 
xy plane of three different particles. In diagrams (a) and (b) the small 




° (Vertical lines 
equally spaced) 


,of motion 


/ = 


182 Force, inertia, and motion 

dots indicate the positions at equal intervals of time. For each case, 
write equations that describe the force components F x and F„. 

6-6 An observer first measures the velocity of an approaching object 
to be 10~ 2 m/sec and then, 1 sec later, to be 2 X 10 -2 m/sec. No 
intermediate readings are possible because the observer's instruments 
take a full second to determine a velocity. If the object has a mass 
of 5 g, what conclusions can the observer make about 

(a) The size of the force that had been aeting? 

(b) The impulse supplicd by the force? 

(c) The work donc by the force? 

6-7 A partiele of mass 2 kg oscillates along the x axis according to 
the equation 


x = 0.2 sin 1 5/ 

where x is in meters and / in seconds. 

(a) What is the force aeting on the partiele at / = 0? 

(b) What is the maximum force that acts on the partiele? 

6-8 A car of mass 10 3 kg is traveling at 28 m/sec (a little over 
60 mph) along a horizontal straight road when the driver suddenly 
sees a fallen tree blocking the road 100 m ahead. The driver applies 
the brakes as soon as his reaetion time (0.75 sec) allows and comes to 
rest 9 m short of the trec. 

(a) Assuming constant deceleration caused by the brakes, what 
is the decelerating force? What fraetion is it of the weight of the car 
(take g = 9.8 m/sec 2 )? 

(b) If the car had been on a downward grade of sin -1 ^) with 
the brakes supplying the same decelerating force as before, with what 
speed would the car have hit the tree ? 

6-9 A partiele of mass m follows a path in the xy plane that is de- 
seribed by the following equations: 

x = A(at — sin a*) 

y = A(l — cos at) 

(a) Sketch this path. 

(b) Find the time-dependent force veetor that causes this motion. 
Can you suggest a way of producing such a situation in praclice? 

6-70 A piece of string of Iength /, which can support a maximum 
tension T, is used to whirl a partiele of mass m in a cireular path. 
What is the maximum speed with which the partiele may be whirled 
if the circle is (a) horizontal; (b) vertical? 

183 Pro b lem s 

Part II 

at work 

Does the engineer ever predict the acceleration of a given 
bodyfrom a knowledge of its mass and of the forces acting 
upon it ? Of course. Does the chemist ever measure the 
mass of an atom by measuring its acceleration in a given 
field offorce? Yes. Does the physicist ever determine the 
strength of a field by measuring the acceleration of a known 
mass in t ha t field? Certainly. Why then, should any one 
of these roles be singled out as the role of Newton's second 
law ofmotion? Thefact is that it has a variety of roles. 

brian ellis, The Origin and Nature 
of Newton's Laws of Motion (1961) 

Using Newton's law 

rr is worth reemphasizing the fact that Newton's law may be 
used in two primary ways: 

1. Given a knowledge of all the forces acting on a body, 
we can calculate its motion. 

2. Given a knowledge of the motion, we can infer what 
force or forces must be acting. ' 

This may seem like a very obvious and quite trivial separa- 
tion, but it is not. The first category represents a purely deductive 
activity — using known laws of force and making clearly defined 
predictions therefrom. The second category includes the in- 
duclive, exploratory use of mechanics — making use of observed 
motions to learn about hitherto unknown features of the inter- 
actions between objects. Skill in the deductive use of Newton's 
law is of course basi c to successful analytical and design work 
in physics and engineering and can bring great intellectual 
satisfaction. But, for the physicist, the real thrill comes from the 
inductive process of probing the forces of nature through the 
study of motions. It was in this way that Newton discovered 
the law of universal gravitation, that Rutherford discovered the 
atomic nucleus, and that the particle physicists explore the struc- 
ture of nucleons (although, to be sure, this last fleld requires 
analysis in terms of quantum mechanics rather than Newtonian 

■If the law of force is also known, this can be used to obtain information 
about an unknown mass. The quotation opposite treats this as a third 




= do + at 

equations : 

> s = so + eot + W 2 

(Constant acceleration only) 

d 2 = do 2 + 2a(s — so) 

In Chapter 8 we shall have something to say about the way in 
which Newton arrived at his insight into gravitational forces 
from the study of planetary motions. But first we shall discuss 
how onc goes about calculating motions from given forces. 
There will be a certain lack of glamour about some of this initial 
work — but that is an inescapable aspect of science, as of every- 
thing else. And some systematic groundwork at the beginning 
will pay rich dividends later. We shall restrict ourselves at first 
to cases in which the forces are constant. Thus we shall be able 
to use the kinematic equations for constant acceleration [Eq. 
(3-10)]. For convenience, we quote the equations again here: 


In any given problem our procedure will be first to identify 
all the forces acting on an object and, from F nct = ma, to cal- 
culate the resultant acceleration. We can then use the kinematic 
equations to describe the subsequent motion. Generally, this 
latter step is merely an exercise in mathematics; the real "physics" 
of the situation lies in the analysis of what forces are present. 
Do not be misled by the apparently trivial nature of these in- 
troductory problems. Taken at face value, they are, indeed, 
uninteresting and inconsequential. But the method of analysis is 
of salient importance— exactly the same approach is used in far 
more sophisticated problems. We purposely begin by choosing 
rather elementary systems to clarify the procedure, so the prob- 
lems are trite. But keep your eye on the method— it is powerful. 

Examp!e 1: Block on a smooth table. By a "smooth" surface 
we mean one that is incapable of exerting any force tangential 
to itself. No such surface exists but some come close enough for 
this to be a useful idealization. 

Consider a block of mass m pulled horizontally along a 
frictionless surface. Question: What is the motion of the block? ' 

Wc first must dctcrmine what forces act on the block. To 
assist the analysis, mentally "isolate the block" with an imag- 

■In this and succeeding cxamplcs we make the assumption that an object at 
rest rclative to the earth's surface has zero acceleration. This is only approxi- 
mately true— see Chapter 12 for a full diseussion. 

188 Usine Newton's law 

Fig. 7-1 (a) BIock 
pulled horizontally on 
a perfeclly smooth 
surface. (b) Same 
block with a slring 
puli in g in an arbitrary 

inary boundary surface [see Fig. 7-1 (a)] and draw a sketch 
showing all the forces that act from outside through this surface 
on the block. 1 They are 

F„ = force of gravity 
T = tension in the string (a contact force) 

N = contact force the table exerts on the block; this force is 
normal to the surface, hence our choice of the letter N 

We have introduced vector symbols here because clearly forces 
acting in more than one direction are involved. The complete 
statement of Newton's law for this case is thus T + N + F„ = 
ma. Since we assume that the block has no acceleration in the 
vertical direction, we conclude that N and F„ are equal and 
opposite vectors; i n other words, 

N + F„ = 

Expressing this a diflferent way, we can say that the magnitude 
F of F„ is equal to the magnitude A' of N, because the mag- 
nitude of a vector, without regard to its direction, is defined as a 
positive quantity. The condition of zero net force component 
along y can then be stated in the equation N — F„ = 0. The 
sum of the forces on the block— the "net" force— is thus (by 
vector addition) equal to T, and hence we have T = ma (with 
both T and a horizontal). 

'We shall, in these examples, treat each object as if it were a point particle, 
with all forces accordingly acting through a single point. 

189 Some introductory cxamples 


The problem becomes somewhat more substantial if we 
suppose that the puli of the string is not horizontal [Fig. 7-1 (b)]. 
The initial vector statement of Newton's law is of the samc form 
as before, but the analysis of it into vertical and horizontal 
components now gives us the following equations: 

Vertically : 
Horizontally : 

N + Tsind - F„ = 
Tcosf? = ma 

The first equation tells us the magnitude of N'. 

N = F g - Tsmd 

(The vertical component of the tension in the string hclps to 
support the block, and so A' becomes less than F g .) The second 
equation tells us directly the magnitude of the horizontal ac- 

We notice that there is a physical limitation on this analysis. 
Unless the table can puli downward on the block, as well as 
being able to push upward on it to support its weight, the force N 
is necessarily upward, as shown in the diagram, and the scalar N 
is necessarily positive. Thus, if Tsin > F„, we cannot satisfy 
the assumed conditions. What happens then? 

Example 2: Block on a rough table. As in Example 1, we 
shall suppose that the block is pulled by a string with a force T, 
and we shall, for simplicity, take the puli to be horizontal (see 
Fig. 7-2). Although this is certainly not a difficult problem, we 
cannot say what will happen unless we have some information 
about the properties of the frictional force 3\ If it is "dry fric- 
tion," we can put 5 < fiN, where /* is the coefficient of friction. 
The value of A' is cqual to F a in this case, and so, writing F B as 
equal to m times the gravitational acceleration g, we have 
9 < nmg. The inequality expresses the ability of the frictional 
force to adjust itself, up to a certain limit, to balance the force T. 

Fig. 7-2 Block 
pulled horizontally 
on a rough surface. 

190 Using Newton's law 

Thus the equation T + JF = ma, which defines the horizontal 
acceleration, leads to two separate statements: 

If T < nmg: 7 - ff = 
If T > nmg: T — nmg = ma 

(and hence a = 0) 

[and hence a = (T/m) — fig] 

We shall not consider in detail what would happen if T were 
applied at an angle to the horizontal. But one can see that this 
will modify the value of N and hence, in turn, the limiting value 
of 5F. You should analyze this case for yourself. 

Example 3: Block on a smooth incline. Two forces act on 
the block (Fig. 7-3): the force N normal to the (frictionless) 
surface and the gravitational force F„. These are in different 
directions, they are bound to have a nonzero resultant, and the 
block must accelerate. We could, if we wished, introduce hori- 
zontal and vertical coordinates x and y and write equations for 
F = ma that would define the components a z and a y of the 
vector acceleration a : 

Ncosd — F„ = ma„ 
N siri 6 = ma x 

It is clear, however, that a is parallel to the slope, and it is simpler 
in this case to introduce the coordinate s representing distance 
along the slope in the downward direction. Resolving the forces 
along and perpendicular to 5, we have 

F„ sin 6 = ma 
N - F cos 6 = 

If we write the magnitude of the gravitational force as equal to 
m times the gravitational acceleration g, the first of these equa- 
tions gives us 

a = g sin d 

Fig. 7-3 Forces acting on a 
block on a perfectly smooth 

191 Some introductory examples 

Fig. 7-4 BIock at resi with 
respect to an accelerating elevator; 
the spring scale records its 
apparent weight. 

Example 4: BIock in an elevator. A block sits on a package 
scale (a spring scale!) in an elevator (Fig. 7-4). Question: What 
does the scale read as the elevator moves up and down? 

Mentally isolating the block, we recognize that only two 
forces act on it. They are: 

V a = the force of gravity (downward) 

N = the contact force (upward) exerted by the scale on the block 

The package scale records the magnitude of N, because, by the 
equality of action and reaction for objects in contact, the force 
exerted on the scale is —N. The value of this reading, under any 
conditions, is what we shall call the measwed weight {W) of the 

If the elevator (and the block and scale with it) has an 
acceleration a, measured as positive upward, then Newton's 
la w requires 

Thus, if the elevator is stationary or is moving with constant 
velocity upward or downward, the reading of the scale is equal to 
the gravitational force on the block. But if the elevator has a 
positive acceleration (upward), then we have 

N = m(g + a) 

In this case the weight of the block, as measured by the scale, 
is greater than the gravitational force on it. One will often 

192 Using Newton's Iaw 

notice this effect personally, as an increased force on the soles 
of the feet, when riding an elevator in two situations: (a) when 
the elevator is picking up speed, going upward, and (b) when it 
is slowing down, going downward. Both of these involve upward 
acceleration . Similarly, if the elevator is slowing down in its 
upward motion or just beginning its downward motion, a is 
downward, so that the measured weight is less than F„. (Inci- 
dentally, the internal discomfort that one sometimes feels in an 
elevator can be linked directly to Newton's law. If the elevator 
acquires a positive (upward) acceleration, onc's heart and 
stomach must — literally — sink a little before they experience 
extra forces from the surrounding tissues to supply the accelera- 
tion called for. 

Example 5 : Two connected masses. Here is a simple example 
designed to illustrate the important point that one is free to 
isolate, in one's imagination, any part of a complete system, and 
apply F = ma to it alone. Figure 7-5 shows two masses con- 
nected by a light (massless) string on a smooth (frictionless) 
surface. A horizontal force, P, pulls at the right-hand mass. 
What can we deduce about the situation? 

First, we can imagine an isolation boundary drawn around 
both m, and m 2 and the string that connects them. The only 
external horizontal force applied to this system is P, and the 
total mass is rtii plus m 2 - Hence we have 

P = (mi + mi)a 

This at once tells us the acceleration that is common to both 
masses. Next, we can imagine an isolation boundary surrounding 
the connecting string alone. In Fig. 7-5 we indicate the forces 
T! and T 2 with which the string pulls on the masses; by the 
equality of aetion and reaetion, the string has forces equal to 
— Ti and — T 2 applied to its ends. The sum of these forces must 
equal the mass of the string times its acceleration a. Assuming 

Fig. 7-5 Two con- 
nected blocks pulled 
horizontal/y on a per- 
fectly smooth surface. 
Newton's law must 
apply to any part of 
the system that one 
chooses to consider. 

193 Some introduetory examples 

the mass of the string to be negligible, this means that T] and T 2 
would have the same magnitude, T, which we call the tension in 
the string. (This idealized result is, of course, rather obvious; 
what is worth noting is that, in any real situation, there would 
have to be enough differencc of tcnsions at the ends of the string 
to supply the requisitc accelerative force to the mass of the 
string itself.) 

Finally, we can imagine drawing isolation boundaries around 
m x and m 2 separately, and applying Newton's law to the hori- 
zontal motion of each: 

T = m\a 
P — T = mza 

Adding these equations, we arrive at the equation of motion of 
the total system once again. But if we take either equation alone, 
substitution of the already determined value of a will give the 
value of the tension T in terms of P and the masses. 

Once again we shall acknowledge the simple character of 
these problems. But if they are studied in the spirit in which they 
are offered— not for their own sake, but for the way in which 
they exemplify the systematic use of Newton's law — they will be 
found to suggest a sound approach to almost any problem that 
involves a direct application of F = mz. 


Ali the examples in the last section dealt with motion along one 
dimension only. This is not a serious limitation because, thanks 
to the "independence of motions," we can always analyze a 
situation at any given instant in terms of the components of 
force and acccleration along separate coordinate directions. The 
simplest case of this occurs when the acceleration a is a constant 
vector. It is then very convenient to choose the direction of a 
itself as one coordinate; along any direction perpendicular to 
this the acceleration component is, by definition, zero, and the 
velocity component must be constant. Probably the most familiar 
example of this procedure is the analysis of motion under gravity 
in the idealization that air resistance can be ignorcd. We con- 
sidered this as a purely kinematic problem in Chapter 3. Another 
example, with the additional feature that we have control over 

194 Using Newton's law 



Focusing anode - 








Glasswallof tube 

Vertical deflection 
plates (simplified) 





from central 


Fig. 7-6 (a) Diagram of the main features ofa simple 
cathode-ray tube. (b) Simplified diagram ofelectrical 
connections and electron trajectory. 

the applied force, is the motion of an electron beam in a cathode- 
ray tube. Let us consider this as a dynamical problem. ' 

Figure 7-6(a) shows a sketch of a cathode-ray tube, and 
Fig. 7-6(b) is a schematic diagram of some principal features. 
A well-focused beam from an electron gun passes between two 
pairs of deflection plates which, if appropriately charged, will 
deflect the beam transversely away from the central axis so as to 
strike any particular point on the fluorescent screen. We shall 
call the central axis the z direetion, so that the direetions of 
transverse deflection, perpendicular to z and to one another, 
can be called x and y, just as in a real oscilloscope. 

The electron gun accelerates the electrons through a po- 

'We shall make use of certain results concerning the effects of electric forees. 
If these are not already familiar to you, see, for example, PSSC, Physics 
(2nd ed.), Part IV, Heath, Boston, 1965. 

195 Motion in two dimensions 

tential difference K . This gives to each electron a kinetic energy 
eV (where e is the elementary charge) so that it acquires a lon- 
gitudinal velocity component v 2 given by 

j»n?, fi = eVo (7-2) 


After leaving the gun, the electron is not subjected to further 
acceleration or decelcration along the z direction, so its z co- 
ordinate continues to change at the rate v z . 

We shall suppose that a potential difference V is applied 
between the upper and lower ^-deflection plates. This means that 
if an electron were to travel all the way from one plate to another, 
it would acquire an energy eV in consequence of the work done 
on it by the transverse electric force F y . If we suppose the plates 
to be parallel and spaced by a distance d that is small compared 
to their length, the force F v would have the same value at all 
points between the plates, so that the gain of energy would also 
be given by F v d. Hence we have 

F =^ 

* . d 

Given this value of F v the electron will, throughout its passage 
between the plates, have an upward acceleration given by 

* m md 

How far vertically will the electron be deflected? This will 
depend on the amount of time it spends between the deflection 
plates. If the horizontal extent of the plates is /, and the hori- 
zontal component of the electron's velocity has the constant 
value v z , the time is given simply by 

= ]_ 


From Eq. (7-1) we cari determine the transverse displacement y 
that occurs during the time this upward force acts: 

s y = vo v t + \a y t 

y = + 

2 md\vj 

196 Using Newton's law 

But from Eq. (7-2), mv z 2 /e is just 2V , so we obtain 

, = IL (7-3) 

This expression gives the transverse displacement of the electron 
as it emerges from the deflection plates. The resultant displace- 
ment away from the central axis of the spot on the fluorescent 
screen may bc found from trigonometric considerations. The z and 
y components of the displacement of the electron while between 
the plates are given by 

z = o, t 

y = W 2 
Eliminating t from these equations shows that y is proportional 
to z 2 , and the trajectory is therefore a parabola. 

Once the electron leaves the region between the plates, there 
is no further force on it and it travcls in a straight line at an 
angle equal to arctan (o„/o,), where v u is its transverse velocity 
component upon leaving the plates. Now we have 

eV i 

v y = aj = — ■% — 

v„ eVI VI 

v z mdo? IV ad 

The additional transverse deflection Y as the electron travels the 
distance D from the deflector plates to the screen is thus given by 

r-*?-g£ (7-4) 

v, 2Vod 

If D » /, as is usually the case in practice, most of the total 
transverse deflection is contained in Y, and we can use Eq. (7-4) 
to estimate the approximate sensitivity of an actual oscilloscope 
[sensitivity = (spot deflection)/(deflection voltage).] 

We may note in passing a striking feature of Eqs. (7-3) and 
(7-4). AU distinguishing characteristics of the particle as an 
electron have disappeared. Any negatively charged particle, with 
any charge or any mass, could in principle pass through the 
system and end up at the same spot on the screen. 

In a real oscilloscope, as Fig. 7-6(a) indicates, the deflector 
plates are not flat and parallel; thus Eqs. (7-3) and (7-4) do not 
strictly apply. It remains true, however, that these equations 
indicate the way in which the deflection depends on the ac- 
celerating and deflecting voltages, and also, in a less specific way, 

197 Molion in two dimensions 

on the characteristic dimensions of the tube. 


The problem of circular motion is often presented as though it 
were separate from the kinds of applications of Newton's law 
that we have discussed so far. It may therefore be worth em- 
phasizing that it involves a completely straightforward use of 
F = wa. The only special feature is that the radial component 
of the acceleration is uniquely related to the radius of the path 
and the instantaneous speed. 

Consider first the simplest case, in which we suppose that 
an object of mass m is traveling around a circle of radius r at a 
constant speed v (Fig. 7-7). Such a motion can be set up, for 
example, by tethering a puck, by means of a taut string, to a 
fixed peg on a very smooth horizontal surface (e.g., an air table) 
and giving the puck an arbitrary velocity at right angles to the 
string. Then, as wc saw in Chapter 3, the acceleration of the 
object is purely toward the center of the circle and is of mag- 
nitude o' 2 /r. We know that the production of this "centripetal" 
acceleration necessitates the existencc of a corresponding force: 

F = ma = 


In the hypothetical case that we have described, this force would 
have to be supplied by the tension T in the tethering string. And 
if the string is not strong enough to supply a force of the required 
magnitude, it will break and the object, being now free of forces 
(at least in the plane of the motion), will fly off along a tangent. 

Fig. 7-7 Basic dynamical situa- 
tion for a parlicle traveling in a 
circle at constant speed. 


Using Newton's law 

\ y 


\ \ 

S* > 

j To center 
of curve 

\ 1 

u «e 

/ ~^j 
/ / 
/ / 

v y 




Rjf. 7-5 (a) View ofa curve in a road, as seenfrom 
vertically ocerhead. (b) Car on the banked curve, as seen 
front directly behind or m front. 

The motion ofa car on a banked curve presents an important 
practical problem of this type. Suppose that a road has a radius 
of curvature r (measured in a horizontal plane), as indicated in 
Fig. 7-8(a) and is banked at an angle a as shown in Fig. 7-8(b). 
A car, traveling into or out of the plane of the latter diagram 
with speed v, has a centripetal acceleration v 2 /r. The purpose 
of banking is to make it possible for the car, traveling at some 
reasonable speed, to be held in this curved path by a force exerted 
on it purely normal to the road surface — i.e., thcre would be no 
tangential force, as there would have to be if the road surface 
were horizontal. (And the inability of the road-tire contact to 
supply such a tangential force would rcsult in skidding.) 

Consider, then, the ideal case as shown in Fig. 7-8(b). 
Resolving the forces vertically and horizontally, and applying 
F = wa, we have 

Nsina = 



Ncosa - F„ = 

Replacing F a by mg, and solving for a, we find that 

tana = — 


which defines the correct angle of banking for given values of v 

199 Motion in a circlc 

and r. Altematively, given r and a, Eq. (7-7) defines the speed 
at which the curve should be taken. The situations that arise if 
greater or lesser values of v are used will require the introduction 
of a frictional force J perpendicular to N (and of limiting mag- 
nitude ij.N) acting inward or outward along the slope of the 
banked surface (see Problem 7-17). 


If a particle changes its speed as it travels along a circular path, 
it has, in addition to the centripetal acceleration toward the 
center of the curvature, a component of acceleration tangent to 
the path. This tangential acceleration component represents the 
rate of change of the magnitude of the vclocity vector. (This is in 
contrast to the centripetal acceleration component, which de- 
pends upon the rate of change of the direction of the velocity 
vector.) We derivcd the relevant results in Chapter 3 [Eq. (3-18)]. 
The situation is most easily handled by considering the two 
components separately: 

radial component of 
acceleration (at right J = a, = - 
angles to the path) 1 j 

(r is the radius of 
r curvature) 

transverse acceleration) ,- £o do [note that this is 

} = a$ = lim — = — « 

(tangent to the path)| a<-.o Al di the change of 

magnitude (only) 

of the velocity 



With only slight rcinterpretation, we may apply these results 
to the case of motion along any arbitrary curvilinear path. For 
every point along such a path, therc is a center of curvature and 
an associatcd radius of curvature (both of which change as one 
movcs along the path). Provided that we interpret the symbols 
r and u to mean the instantaneous values of the radius of curvature 
and the speed, the above expressions are perfectly general. They 
give the instantaneous acceleration components — tangent to the 

' In our formal diseussion of coordinate systems in Chapter 2 we defined the 
outward radial direction as positive. We are introducing here the symbol a, 
to denote the acceleration component along this direction. The minus sign 
indicates that this acceleration is in faet toward the center (i.e., centripetal), 
as we have diseussed. Sce also the diseussion on pp. 106-108. 

200 Using Nevvton's law 

Arbitrary path 

Fig. 7-9 Acceleration componenls at a poinl on 
an arbitrarily curved palh. 

path, and normal to the path — for the general curvilinear motion. 
In this case Fig. 7-9 indicates a more appropriate notation for 
these acceleration components. 

A particle of dust that rides, without slipping, on a phono- 
graph turntable as it starts up provides a simple and familiar 
example of a particle possessing both radial and tangential ac- 
celeration components. Its total acceleration a (Fig. 7-10) is the 
combination of a r and o» at right angles: a = (a r 2 + a» 2 ) 1 ' 2 . 
The net horizontal force applied to the particle by the turntable 
must be in the direction of a and of magnitude ma. If the contact 
between the turntable and the particle cannot supply a force 
of this magnitude, such circular motion is not possible and the 
particle will slip relative to the surface. 

If we analyze the process of whirling an object at the end 
of a string, so as to bring it from rest up to some high speed of 
circular motion (as, for example, in the athletic event "throwing 
the hammer") we see that the string must perform two functions: 
(1) supply the tangential force to increase the speed of the object, 
and (2) supply the force of the appropriate magnitude mv 2 /r 

Fig. 7-10 Net acceleration 
vector ofa particle attached to 
a disk ifthe angular velocity of 
the disk is changing. 

201 Curvilinear motion with changing speed 

Fig. 7-11 Pari ide tracels i n a 
circular path about O. To in- 
crease its speed, the slring PO' 
must provide a force com- 
ponent langenlial to the circle. 

toward the center of the circle. To fiil this dual role, the puli 
supplied by the string must "lead" the object, so that the tension 
supplied by it has a tangential component, as shown in Fig. 7-11. 
This can be maintained if the inner end, O', of the string is con- 
tinually moved around in a circular path, as indicated. This is 
the kind of thing we do more or less instinctively in practice. 


One of the most important examples of circular motion is the 
behavior of electrically charged particles in magnetic fields. 
The separate section on pp. 205-206 summarizes the properties of 
the magnetic force and describes how this force is in general 
given by the following equation: 

F mag = W X B 


where q is the electric charge of the particle (positive or negative). 
Let us now imagine a charged particle of (positive) charge 
q, moving in the plane of this page, in a region in which the 
magnetic fieid B points perpendicularly down into the paper. 
Then from Eq. (7-9) we have 

F = qvB 


This is a pure deflccting force, always at right angles to the 
particle's motion. Hence the magnitude of the velocity v cannot 
change, but its direction changes uniformly with time. Thus, 
although there is no center of force in the usual sense, the par- 
ticle describes a circular path of radius r with center O [Fig. 

202 Using Newton's law 



Fig. 7-12 (a) Charged parlicle following a circular path 
in a uniform magnelicfield. (b) Magnelicalty curved 
tracks ofelectrons and posilrons in a cloud chamber. 
The main fealure is the pai h ofan eleclron of inilial 
energy 30 MeV going through a succession ofalmosl 
circular orbils ofdecreasing radius as U loses energy. 
(Courtesy oflhe Unicersily of California Lawrence 
Radiation Laboralory, Berkeley.) 

7-1 2(a)]. The centripetal acceleration is v 2 /r, and so by Newton's 
law we have 

qvB = 




Thus the radius of the circle is a mcasure of the momentum mv 

203 Charged particles in uniform magnetic ftelds 

of a particle of given charge in a given magnetic field. This fact 
underlies the nuclear physicist's method for determining the 
momenta of charged particles in a cloud or bubble chamber 
[see Fig. 7-1 2(b)]. From the radius of the circular track which 
a charged particle generates in a cloud chamber placed between 
the poles of a magnet the momentum can be readily found if the 
charge of the particle is known. To get the period T (or the 
angular velocity), wc write 

qvB = mwv 


o> = % = 1 B (7-12) 

which is independent of the particle's spced. The angular fre- 
quency given by Eq. (7-12) is called the "cyclotron" frequency 
and depends, for a fixed magnetic field, only on the ratio of charge 
to mass of the particle. It was the recognition of this by E. O. 
Lawrence that led him in 1929 to design the first cyclotron, in 
which protons could be raiscd to high energies by the application 
of an alternating electric field of constant frequency. The hold- 
ing of charged particles in an orbit of a given radius by means 
of a magnetic field is an essential feature of most high-energy 
nuclear accelerators. 

Having the velocity in a plane perpendicular to B is, of 
course, a very special case. But if this condition is not satisfied, 
we can imagine v to be resolved into one component perpendic- 
ular to B and a second component parallel to B. The latter, by 
Eq. (7-9), has no magnetic forcc associated with it; the former 

Fig. 7-13 Helical 
path of charged par- 
ticle having a velocity 
component parallel 
t o a magnetic field. 

v s = const. 

204 (Jsing Newton's lavv 

changes with time in precisely the way described above. Thus 
the resultant motion is a helix, whose projection on the plane 
perpendicular to B is a fixed circle, as shown in Fig. 7-13. 


It is a matter of experimental fact that an electrically charged 
particle may, at a givcn point in space, experience a force when 
it is moving which is abscnt if it is at the same point but sta- 
tionary. The cxistence of such a force depends on the presence 
somewhere in the neighborhood (although perhaps quite far 
away) of magnets or electric currents. Detailed observations 
reveal the following featurcs [cf. Fig. 7-14]: 

1 . The force is always exerted at right angles to the direction 
of the velocity v of the particle. The force is reversed if the 
direction of the velocity is reversed. 

2. The force is proportional to the amount of charge, q, 
carried by the particle. The force reverses if the sign of the 
charge is reversed. 

3. For a given value of q and a given direction of v, the size 
of the force is proportional to the magnitude of v. 

4. For motion parallel to one certain direction at a given 
point, the force is zero. This direction coincides with the direc- 
tion in which a compass needle placed there would align itself. 
It is called the direction of the magnetic _/?e W at that point. 

5. For any other direction of motion, the direction of the 

Fig. 7-14 (o) Situa- 
tions of zero force 
and maximum force 
for a charged par- 
ticle moving in a 
magnet ic field. 
(b) General veetor 
relationship of veloc- 
ity, magnetic field, 
and magnetic force. 

Field direction 

Field direction 


205 Charged particle in a magnetic field 

force is perpendicular to the plane formed by v and the field 

6. The magnitude of the force is proportional, for given 
values of q and v and for a fixed magnetic field arrangement, to 
the sine of the angle between v and the field direction. 

Ali the above results can be summarized in a very compaet 
mathematical statement. We are going to intro'duce a quantitative 
measure of the magnetic field strength and denote it by the 
veetor symbol B, in such a way that Fig. 7-14 shows the relation 
of the direetions of qv, B, and F for a charged partiele. (Note 
that q may be of either sign and that F is normal to the plane 
containing v and B.) Then the value of F, in both magnitude and 
direction, is given by the following equation, involving the cross 
produet of veetors (see p. 127): 

F = «vXB 

We can then use this equation to define the quantitative measure 
of the magnetic field strength, such that a field of unit strength, 
applied at right angles (sin 6 = 1) to a charge of 1 C moving 
with a speed of 1 m/sec, would produce a force of 1 N. 


The charaeteristie curvature of a partiele of given q/m in a 
magnetic field provides the basis of nearly all methods of obtain- 
ing precise relative values of atomic and isotopic masses. Such 
devices often make use of the magnetic force in two ways, first 
as a velocity selector and second in the manner deseribed in the 
last seetion. The velocity selection takes advantage of the faet 
that the magnetic force on a charged partiele is proportional to 
v, whercas the electric force is not. If a beam of charged partieles 
travels between parallel plates a distance d apart, with voltage 
difference V, the electric force is given by 

F a = ^ (7-13) 

But the magnetic force is given by Eq. (7-10), 

fmag = $<-'£ 
These forees can be arrangcd to be in opposite direetions by 

206 Using Newton's law 

Fig. 7-15 (a) Schematic design ofa simpleform ofmass 
spectrometer. (b) Exampfe ofisolopic separalion and 
mass analysisfor isolopes of xenon with a spectrometer 
like that in (a). [After A. O. Nier, Phys. Rev., 52, 933 

207 Mass spcctrographs 

applying the magnetic field at right angles to the electric field. 
There is then only one speed at which particles can travel through 
these "crossed fields" undeflected: 



Figure 7-15(a) is a diagram of a simple mass spectrograph 
that uses a velocity filter of this type, followed by a region in 
which the chargcd particles (ions) travel in a semicircular path 
under the influence of the magnetic field alone. Figure 7— 15(b) 
shows an example of the separation of isotopes by such a device. 


The question of the stresses set up in a rotating object, and the 
possibility of fracture i f they bccome excessive, provides another 
good example of Newton's law applied to uniform circular 
motion. Whenever an object such as a wheel is rotating, every 
portion of it has an acceleration toward the axis of rotation, and 
a corresponding accelcrative force is required. Suppose, for 
example, that a thin wheel or hoop of radius r is rotating about 
its axis at n revolutions per second (rps) [see Fig. 7-1 6 (a)]. Then 
any small section of the hoop, such as the one shown shaded, 
must be supplied with a forcc cqual to its mass, m, multiplied 
by its centripetal acceleration v 2 /r. In this case the magnitude 
of the angular velocity w is defined by the equation 

to = 2irn 

Fig. 7-16 (a) Rotat- 
ing hoop. (i) Forces 
aeting on a small ele- 
men! of the hoop. 

208 Using Newton's law 

Thus the instantaneous specd is given by 

v = ar = lirrn (7-15) 

If we make an isolation diagram [Fig. 7-16(b)] for the small 
portion of material shown shaded in Fig. 7-16(a), it is clear 
that the forces acting on it must be supplied via its contact with 
adjacent material of the rim. ' These forces must, by symmetry, 
be tangential to the rim at each point. (For example, if the force 
exerted on Am at one end had a component radially outward, 
then by the equality of action and reaction the portion of ma- 
terial with which it was in contact would be subjected to a force 
with a component radially inward. But in a uniform hoop, all 
portions such as Am are equivalent; there is no basis for any 
asymmetries of this kind.) Thus we can picture the small portion 
of the rim being acted on by a force of magnitude T at each end. 
If the length of arc represented by this portion is As, it subtends 
an angle A0, equal to As/r, at the center O, and each force has a 
component equal to Tsin(A0/2) along the bisector of AS. Thus 
by Newton's law we have 

o 2 
27"sin(A0/2) = Am — 

Putting sin(A0/2) « A0/2, this then gives us 


7"A0 ^ Am — 



T — ~ Am — 

r r 


7" A.? = o 2 Am (7-16) 

Let us now express the mass Am in terms of the density, p, 
of the material and the volume of the piece of the rim. If the 
cross-sectional area o f the rim is A, we have 

Am = pAAs 

'We shall assume that the spokcs of the wheel serve primarily to give just a 
geometrical connection between the rim and the axis and have almost negli- 
gible strength. 

209 The fraeture of rapidly rotating objects 

Substituting this into Eq. (7-16) and substituting o = lirrn from 
Eq. (7-15), we obtain the following result: 

T = 4t¥rV< CM7) 

Now, it is an cxperimental fact that a bar or rod of a given 
material will fracture under tension if the ratio of the applied 
force to the cross-sectional area exceeds a certain critical value — 
the ultimate tensile strength, S. Thus we can infer from Eq. (7-17) 
that a hoop of the kind we have bcen discussing has a critical 
ratc of rotation, above which it will burst. We have, in fact, 

Wmox = iw 



Suppose, for cxample, that we have a steel hoop of radius 1 ft 
(i.e., about 0.3 m). The density of steel is about 7600 kg/m 3 , 
and its ultimate strength is about 10° N/m 2 . These values lead 
to a value of n max of about 500 rps, or 30,000 rpm— much faster 
than any such wheel would normally be driven. However, the 
rotors of ultracentrifuges arc, in fact, driven at speeds of this 
order, up to a significant fraetion of the bursting speed for their 
particular radius (sec p. 513). 


We shall now consider an important class of problems in which 
an object is subjected to a constant driving force, F , but has its 
motion opposed by a resistive force, R, that always acts in a 
direetion opposite to the instantaneous velocity. Typical of such 
forees are the frictional resistance as an object is pulled along a 
solid surface, or the air resistance to falling raindrops, moving 
cars, and so on. In general this resistive force is a funetion of 
speed, so that the statement of Newton's law must be written 
as follows: 

F - R(o) = m j (7-19) 

As we saw in Chaptcr 5, the resistive force of dry frietion is 
in fact nearly independent of u, as indicated in Fig. 7-1 7(a), so 
that we can put 

R(c) -= 5 ~ const. 
210 Usili»; Newton's la w 

Fig. 7-17 (o) Dric- 
mg and resistive 
forces for an object 
resisted by dryfric- 
lion. (b) Dricing and 
resistive forces for an 
object resisted by 
fluid friction. 


force RW 

Driving force 


Driving force / 


Frictional force 






Equation (7-19) then reduces to the simplc case of acceleration 
undcr a constant net force, as dcscribed by the kinematics of 
Eqs. (7-1). The situation is very different in the case of fluid 
resistance, for which R(o) increases monotonically with o, as 
indicated in Fig. 7-1 7(b) and as described [Eq. (5-4)] by the 

R(c) = Ac + Bv 2 


In this case, if we consider an object starting out from rest under 
the force F , the initial acceleration is FJm, but the net driving 
force is immediately rcduced to a value below F , because as soon 
as the object has any appreciable velocity it is exposed, in its 
own frame of reference, to a wind or flow of fluid past it at the 
speed v. The statement of Newton's law as it applies to this 
problem must now be written 

m— = Fq — Av — Bu 


(In this equation F , A, B, and v are all taken to be positive. 
One must be careful to consider what is the appropriate state- 
ment of Newton's law for this system if the direetion of v is 

The solving of Eq. (7-21) is not at all such a simple matter 
as our familiar problems involving constant forces or forces 
perpendicular to the velocity. Wc are now faced with finding the 
solution to an awkward differential equation. We do not intend 
to plunge into all the formal mathematies of this problem. In- 
stead, this is a suitable moment to point to the value of ap- 

211 Motion against resistive forces 

proximate numerical methods— in other words, the method of 
the digital computer, using finitely small intervals. We outlined 
the principle of the method in Chapter 3 [Eq. (3-11)]; here we 
have a good case for using it. First, however, let us consider 
some individual features of the solution: 

1. For some rangc of small values of v, the acceleration will 
be almost constant and o will start off as a linear funetion of t 
with slope F /m. 

2. As c increases, a decreases monotonically, giving a steadily 
decreasing slope in the graph of v versus t (Fig. 7-18). 

3. There is a limiling speed, v m , under any given applied 
foree. It is the speed at which the graph of R(v) versus v is inter- 
seeted by a horizontal line at the ordinate equal to F [see Fig. 
7-17(b)]. Algebraically, it is the positive root of the quadratic 

B v* 

Ao - F = 

(What is the status of the negative root, and why is it to be 

Notice the contrast between the sharply defined value of v„, 
in the graph of R(v) versus o, and the gradual manner in which 
this velocity is approached (and in principle never quite reached) 
if one considers u as a funetion of time (Fig. 7-18). 

It is well worth taking a moment to consider the dynamical 
situation represented by v = v,„. It is a motion with zero ac- 
celeration under zero net foree, but it seems a far cry from the 
unacceleratcd motion of objects moving under no foree at all; 
and it is ccrtainly not an application of what we understand by 
the principle of inertia. But let us emphasize that, like static 
equilibrium, it is a case of ZF = 0. Every time we see a car 

Fig. 7-18 Asymplolic approach 
lo terminal speed for object in a 
fluid resislice medium. 

212 Using Newton's law 

hurtling along a straight road at a steady 80 mph, or a jet plane 
racing through the air at a constant 600 mph, we are seeing objects 
traveling under zero net force. This basic dynamical fact tends to 
be obscured because what matters in practical terms is the large 
value of the driving force F needed to maintain the steady 
motion once it has been established. 


In order to see how Newton's law for resisted motion [Eq. (7-21)] 
works in practice we need to introduce one additional feature 
already describcd in Chapter 5 — that the two terms in the rc- 
sistive force differ not only in their dependcncc on d but also in 
their dependence on the linear dimensions of the object (see 
Fig. 7-19). Specifically, for a sphere of radius r we have 

A = C\r 
B = C 2 r' 2 

and thus 

R(v) = C\ro + C2'V 


The two terms in the resistance thus become equal at a critical 
speed, v c , defined by the formula 

V c = 

c 2 r 


We know that the term proportional to v will dominate the 
picture if v is sufficiently small (since Bv 2 /Av ~ v), but we know 

Fig. 7-19 (a) Linear 
and quadratic terms 
influid resistance for 
a small object, with 
viscous resistance 
(b) Similar graphfor 
a large object, for 
which the v 2 term 
predominates at a/l 
except low speeds. 

213 Dciailcd analvsis of resisted motion 

equally that for speeds much in excess of v c (say v > 10u c ) the 
quadratic term takes over. If the resistive medium is air, the 
coeffkients c t and c 2 have the following approximate values: 

ci = 3.1 X 10- 4 kgm- 1 sec _1 
c 2 = 0.87 kg/m 3 

Thus, if r is expressed in meters, we have 

... 3.6 X 10~ 4 ,, ... 

v c (m/sec) = (7-24) 

This means that for an object such as a small pebble, with 
r » 1 cm, the value of v c is only a few centimeters per second; a 
speed equal to 10 times this (say 0.5 m/sec) would be acquired 
in free fail under gravity within a time of about 0.05 sec and a 
distance of about 0.5 in. (Check thcsc numbers!) Thus for most 
problems of practical interest (we shall consider an exception in 
the next section) the motion under a constant applied force in a 
resisting medium can be extremely well described with the help 
of the following simplified version of Eq. (7-21): 

m ^ « F - B 2 (7-25) 


The resistive term, Bv 2 , is quite important in the motion of 
ordinary objects falling through the air under gravity. This 
becomes very apparent if we calculate the terminal speed, v t , by 
putting dv/dt = in Eq. (7-25), with F set equal to the gravita- 
tional force, mg. Take, for example, the case of our pebble of 
radius 1 cm. The density of stone or rock is about 2.5 times that 
of water, i.e., about 2500 kg/m :! , so we have 

m = ^ pr :s « 4(2.5 X 10 a ) X (10" 2 ) 3 « 10" 2 kg 

The value of F is thus about 0.1 N. The value of the coef- 
ficient B (= c 2 r 2 ) for an object of this size is about 10 -4 kg/m. 
Substituting these values in the equation 

F - Bu, 2 = 
we find 

Vi « 30 m/sec 
Under the assumptions of genuinely free fail, this speed would 

214 Using Ncwton's law 

be attained in a time of about 3 sec and a vertical distance of 
about 150 ft. We can be sure, then, that the effects of the re- 
sistance become quite significant within times and distances 
appreciably Iess than these. This means that many of the ideal- 
ized problems of free fail under gravity, of the sort that everyone 
meets in his first encounter with mechanics, do not correspond 
very well with reality. 

Let us now consider the computer procedure for solving 
these problems. Given a computer, it is almost as little trouble 
to handle the full equation [Eq. (7-21)] as it is to use the ap- 
proximation represented by Eq. (7-25). But for the purposes 
of discussing the method, we shall use the simpler, approximate 

We choose some convenient small increment of time, A/, 
and will measure time from t = in terms of integral multiples 
(n) of Af. In the simplest approach, we assume that the accelera- 
tion during each small interval remains constant at the value 
calculated for the beginning of that interval. Thus, for an initial 
velocity equal to zero, the acceleration during the first At is set 
equal to a (= F J m). The velocity Vi at the end of this interval 
is thus given by 

ci = + aoA/ 

Using this velocity, we calculate the acceleration d\ at / = At: 

B 2 

a i = tfo Cl 


Applying this acceleration to the next interval, the velocity at 
t = 2 At is given by 

02 = vi + fli At 

We know that the first step in the calculation, as performed in 
this way, leads to an overestimate of Pj, but we see that in this 
particular problem the error is in some measure compensated by 
leading in turn to an underestimate of a%. The calculated values 
of a in successive time intervals are as indicated in Fig. 7-20(a). 
Applying an exactly similar treatment to the changes of position 
(jt„) we would take our set of values of velocities, as given by the 
above calculation and represented graphically in Fig. 7-21 (a), 
and would use the following formula : 

x„ +i = x„ + v„At 

215 Detailed analysis of resisted motion 

Fig. 7-20 (d) Basis 
ofsimple ealculation 
of acceleration versus 
time for objecl start- 
ingfrom resi i n a 
resistive medium. 
The acceleration is 
calculaied from the 
speed al the begin- 
ning ofeach time in- 
terval. {b)lmproved 
approach to the same 
problem, using ac- 
celeration calculated 
from speed at mid- 
point ofeach time 

Thus we should have 

x\ = ro A/ = (clearly an underestimate) 
X2 = x\ + oi At = vi At 

X3 = X2 + CiAt 

Our graph of x versus t would be the result of summing the areas 
of the rectangles in Fig. 7-21 (a) up to successively greater values 
of n. 

A more sophisticated analysis takes account of the fact that 
a better average value of the acceleration or velocity during a 
given time interval is provided by the instantaneous value at the 
midpoint of that interval. Thus the acceleration between n At and 
(n + 1) At is set equal to the instantaneous value at (n + -J) At. 
This Ieads to the following formulas: 

Fig. 7-21 (a) Veloc- 
ity-time graph based 
on velocities at the 
beginnings of the suc- 
cessive time intervals. 
(b) Improved graph 
based on velocities 
evaluated at mid- 
points of the time 

216 Using Newton's law 

v n +i = c„ + a n+ i /2 A/ 

*»+l = X„ + Vn+i /2 &l 


This looks fine, but we now run into a slight snag when we try 
to get the calculation started. To find v u the velocity at the cnd 
of the first interval, we now need v (= 0) and a ll2 . The lattcr, 
however, by Eq. (7-25), depends on a knowledge of v U2 , which 
we do not yet know. (Noticc that in the first, crude method, we 
were able to start out directly from the initial conditions v 
and a .) We are thus forced to compromise a little, although we 

Fig. 7-22 (a) Com- 
parison ofidealized 
(resistanceless) and 
aclual dependence of 
speed on lime for a 
falling pebble of 
radius l cm. 
(b) Idealized and 
aclual dislances fallen I 
by such a pebble. 

217 Detailcd analysis of resistcd motion 

are still Ieft with a better treatment than before. What we do is 
to calculate an approximate value of vn 2 from the equation 

V112 » «o -z (7-27) 

and then we are under way. Figures 7-20(b) and 7-21 (b) show 
what this method means in terms of graphs of a and v against 

Figure 7-22 shows graphs of the actual calculated variation 
of speed and distance with time for our 1-cm-radius pebble falling 
in air, under gravity; the idcalizcd frce-fall curves are given 
for comparison. 


If we are dealing with microscopic or near-microscopic objects, 
such as particlcs of dust, then, in contrast to the situations dis- 
cussed above, the resistance is due almost entirely to the viscous 
term, Av, up to quite high values of v. If, for cxample, we con- 
sider a tiny particle of radius 1 m (= 10 -6 m), then Eq. (7-24) 
tells us that the critical spccd, v c , at which the contributions Av 
and Bo 2 bccome equal, is 360 m/sec. This implies a wide range 
of lower speeds for which the motion is controlled by viscous 
resistance alone, and the statcmcnt of Newton's law can be 
writtcn, without any appreciable error, in the following form: 

m *° mFo -Ao (7-28) 



A = c\r 

Motion under these conditions played the central role in 
R. A. Millikan's cclebrated "oil-drop" experiment to determine 
the elcmentary electric charge. The basic idea was to measure 
the electric foree exerted on a small charged object by finding the 
terminal spced of the object in air. If the radius of the particle is 
known, the resistive foree is completely determined, and the 
driving foree must be equal and opposite to it at v = v t . 

In Millikan's original experiments the charged partieles 
were tiny droplets of oil in the mist of vapor from an "atomizer." 
Such droplets havc a high probability of carrying a net electric 

218 Using Newton's law 

d q 

Fig. 7-23 Basic paratlel-plate arrangement in Millikan 

charge of either sign when they are produced. In order to apply 
electric forces to them, Millikan used the arrangement shown 
schematically in Fig. 7-23. Two parallel metal plates, spaced by 
a small fraction of their diameter, are connected to the terminals 
of a battery. ' The force on a particle of charge q anywhere be- 
tween these plates is given by 

_ v 


where V is the voltage difference applied to the plates and d is 
their separation in meters. If q is measured in coulombs, F is 
given in newtons by this equation. (See also our discussion of the 
cathode-ray oscilloscope, p. 195.) Thus if a dynamic balance 
were set up between this electric driving force and the resistive 
force Av-, we should have 

q-j= Ad, = ciru, 

The droplets randomly produced in a mist of oil vapor are 
of various sizes. The ones that Millikan found most suitable for 
his experiments were the smallest (partially because they had the 
lowest terminal speed under their own weight). But these drop- 
lets were so tiny that even through a medium-power microscope 
they appeared against a dark background merely as points of 
light; no direct measurement could be made of their size. 
Millikan, however, used the clever trick of exploiting the law of 
viscous resistance a second time by applying it to the fail of a 
droplet under the gravitational force alone, with no voltage 
between the plates. Under these conditions we have 

Fo = mg = y pr g 

where p is the density of oil (about 800 kg/m 3 ). The terminal 
speed of fail under gravity is then given by 

■Millikan himself used plates about 20 cm across and 1 cm apart and several 
thousand volts. Most modern versions of the apparatus use smaller values 
of all three quantities. 

219 Motion governed by viscosity 

4jt a 

y pr g = cirD B 

(Gravitational) u„ = y — r 2 (7-30) 

Putting in the approximate numcrical values we find 
(Gravitational) i?„ ~ 10 r 2 (u ( in m/sec, /• in m) 

Putting r « lju = 10 -0 m, we have 
f « 10 -4 m/sec = 0.1 mm/sec 

Such a droplet would take over 1 min to fail 1 cm in air under 
its own weight, thus allowing prccision measurements of its speed. 
(It is clear, incidentally, that for such motions as this the re- 
sistive term Bo 2 is utterly negligible.) 

It is worth noting the dynamical stability of this system, 
and indeed of any situation involving a constant driving force 
and a resistive force that increases monotonically with speed. If 
by chance the droplet should slow down a little, there is a net 
force that will speed it up. Conversely, if it should speed up, it is 
subjected to a net retarding force. If one could observe the 
motion of a falling droplet in sufficient detail, this behavior would 
doubtless be found, because the air, being made up of individual 
molecules, does not behave as a perfectly homogeneous fluid. In 
other words, the speed of the droplet would fluetuate about some 
average value, although the fluetuations would be exceedingly 

In the Millikan experiment proper, the vertical motion of 
the charged droplets is studied with the electric force either aiding 
or opposing the gravitational force. Thus if we measure velocities 
as positive downward, the terminal velocity in both magnitude 
and sign will be defined by the equation 

mg + *r- cm, (7-31) 

where V is the voltage of the upper plate relative to the lower 
and q is the net charge on the drop (positive or negative). Al- 
though in principle the terminal velocity is approached but never 
quite reached (see Fig. 7-18), the small droplets under the con- 
ditions of the Millikan experimcnt do, in effect, reach this speed 
within a very short time — much less than 1 msec in most cases 
(see the next seetion). 

Millikan was able to follow the motion of a given droplet 

220 Using Ncwton's lavv 

for many hours on end, using its electric charge as a handle by 
which to puli it up or down at will. In the course of such pro- 
tracted observations the charge on the drop would often change 
spontaneously, and several different values of v, would be ob- 
tained. The crucial observation was that in any such experiment, 
with a given value of the voltage V, the speed v t was limited to a 
set of sharp and distinct values, implying that the electric charge 
itself comes in discrete units. But Millikan went further and 
obtained the first precise value of the absolute magnitude of the 
elementary charge. ' 

You might wonder why Millikan used such a roundabout 
method to measure the electric force exerted on a charged 
particle. After all, it would in principle be possible to hang such 
an electrified particle on a balance and measure the force in a 
static arrangement. However, in practice, when only a few 
elementary charges are involved, the forces are extremely weak 
and such a method is not feasible. For example, the force on a 
particle with a net charge of 10 elementary units, between plates 
1 cm apart with 500 V between them, is only about 10~ 13 N, 
equal to the gravitational force on only 10 ,upg! 


We have seen how the velocity under a constant force in a 
resistive fluid medium rises asymptotically toward the terminal 
value. What happens if the driving force is suddenly removed? 
We can guess that the velocity will decay away toward zero in a 
similar asymptotic way, as indicated in Fig. 7-24. If the initial 
speed is small enough, the whole decay depends on viscous re- 
sistance alone and is governed by a special, simplified form of 
Eq. (7-28) in which F is set equal to zero: 

m— = — Av 

or (7-32) 


— = — at) 

where a = A/m. 

'For his own full and interesting account (and much other good physics), 
see R. A. Millikan, The Electron (J. W. M. Du Mond, ed.), University of 
Chicago Press (Phoenix Series), Chicago, 1963. 

221 Growth and decay of rcsisted motion 

Fig. 7-24 Growth 
and decay of the 
velocity ofa parlicle 
controlled by a vis- 
cous resistiue force 
proportional to v. 

You may recognizc Eq. (7-32) as the basic differential 
equation of all forms of exponential decay. Whether you do or 
not, you may like to see how this equation can be solved by what 
is in effect just arithmetic, using the approach of numerical 
analysis and digital-computer techniques. We divide up the time 
into a large number of equal intervals Al, and interpret Eq. (7-32) 
as telling us that the changc of v between t = n At and t = 
(n + 1)A/ is proportional to the mean velocity during that 

Au = v n+ i 



Solving this, we have 

t;„ + i 1 - aAt/2 _ 

1 + a Al/2 

where/is a constant ratio, less than unity. The velocities at equal 
intervals of time thus decrease in geometric proportion. If the 
initial velocity is u , the velocity at time t (= k Al) is given by 

Substituting the expression for / from the preceding equation 
and putting k = t/At, we thus get 



1 - aAr/2 \ 
1 + a At/l) 


We shall now consider what happens to this expression as we 
imagine the intervals At to be made shorter and shorter, and their 
number correspondingly greater. To simplify the discussion, we 
shall put 

aAt = - 


222 Using Newton's law 

The quantity z is then a large number that we shall allow to 
approach infinity. 

Besides substituting oi/= l/z in the above equation for 
u(l), we shall also replace the exponent t/At by its equivalent 
quantity, azt. Thus we have 

/l - \/2z\ a " 


\i -r i/^z/ 


o (0 «» tfO/> 

Let us look at the behavior of p(z) as z is made larger and 
larger (Table 7-1). As z increases, the number p is clearly ap- 

TABLE 7-1 



Decimal value of p 




(3/5) 2 
(9/1 l) 5 

0.3333 . . . 








proaching a limiting value; this value is 0.367879 . . . and is the 
reciprocal of the famous number e (= 2.71828 . . .), which forms 
the base of natural or Napierian logarithms. Thus in Eq. (7-32) 
we can put 

lim p(z) = 0.367879 . . . = e -1 

Z— *X 

and hence we have the following expression, now exact, for the 
value of v(i): 

v(t) = v e~°' (7-34) 

The reciprocal of a in Eq. (7-34) is of the dimension of time 

223 Growth and decay of resisteci molion 

and represents a characteristic time constant, t, for the ex- 
ponential decay pjocess. I n the particular case of small spheres 
moving through the air, r is defined by the equation 

_ m m_ 0. 

A ar 

We can express this in much more vivid terms by introducing the 
terminal velocity of fail under gravity, v g . For from Eq. (7-30) 
we have 



It follows that we have 

r = 2» • (7-35) 


Thus t is equal to the time that a particle would take to reach 
a velocity equal to the terminal Velocity under conditions of 
free fail. For an oil drop of radius 1 /j., with v„ » 0.1 mm/sec, 
this time would be only about 10 -5 sec (= 10/tsec). 

In a time equal to any substantial multiple of t, the value 
of v(t) as given by Eq. (7-34) falls to a very small fraction of vo- 
For example, if we take the basic equation 

v(t) = voe-' ir . (7-36) 

and put t = 10r, then the value of v becomes less than 10 -4 of 
v , which for many purposes can be taken to be effectively zero. 
It is more or less intuitively clear that the growth of velocity 
toward its limiting value, after a particle starts from rest under 
the action of a suddenly applied driving force, must be a kind 
of upside-down version of the decay curve (see Fig. 7-24). In 
fact, if the terminal velocity is o«, the approach to it, under these 
conditions of viscous rcsistance, is described by 

v(l) = o Al - e-" T ) (7-37) 

If one chooses to write this in the form 

■ t v — lir 

v, — u(0 - »( e 

one can see explicitly how closely the growth and decay curves 
are related. Indeed, one could almost deduce Eq. (7-37) from 
Eq. (7-36) plus the recognition of this symmetry. 

224 Using "New lon's law 


When Galileo put forward the proposition that the motion of a 
projectile could be analyzed into separate horizontal and vertical 
* parts, with a constant velocity horizontally and a constant ac- 

celeration under gravity vertically, he made a great contribution 
to the conceptual basis of mechanics. It may be worth pointing 
out, however, that this "independence of motions" breaks down 
if one takes into account the resistive force exerted on objects 
of ordinary size. We have seen how for such objects the magnitude 
of the resistive force is proportional to the square of the speed. 
Consider an object moving in a vertical plane (Fig. 7-25). 
At a given instant let its velocity v be directed at an angle 6 above 
the horizontal, as shown." The object is then subjected to the 
gravitational force, F„, and a resistive force R(u), of magnitude 
Bv 2 , in a direction opposite to v. Newton's law applied to the 
x and y components of the motion at any instant, thus gives us 

m d -^= -R z = -Bo 2 cose 

■ dCy _ 2 • n 

m-^ = —mg — Bu sin 6 

Since v cos 6 = v z , and v sin 6 = v u , we can rewrite these equa- 
tions as folio ws: 

do * la \ 

m — = - {BojOm 

m-— = -mg - (flOPy 

Thus the equation governing each separate component of the 
velocity involves a knowledge of the magnitude of the total 
velocity and hence of what is happening at each instant along the 
other coordinate direction. The larger the magnitude of v, 
the more important does this cross connection between the dif- 
( a ) ferent components of the motion become. Thus we really cannot 

caleulate the vertical motion of a falling body without reference 

Fig. 7-25 Resistive and gravitational force vectorsfor a 
partiele moving in a vertical plane. 

225 Air resistance and "independence of motions" 

to the horizontal component. Recognition of this fact may be 
salutary for those who are accustomed to taking for granted the 
idealized equations of falling objects. In the folklore of physics 
there is the story of the impecunious student who would make 
money off his nonscientific acquaintances by a bet. He asked 
them to consider two identical objects. One is dropped from 
rest at a certain height above the ground; the other is fired off 
horizontally at the same instant. Which one will reach the ground 
first? The victim (poor ignoramus!) would often have some 
vague idea that the fast horizontal motion of the second object 
must somehow keep it in the air longer. But of course that is 
demonstrably false, isn't it?— look at the analysis of motion 
under gravity in Chapter 3. And even a direct test would appear 
to prove the poin t if the velocities were kept small. But the 
complete equations, as written above, show that a large initial 
horizontal velocity would increase the time taken to descend a 
given vertical distance. Moral: Beware of facile idealizations. 
Notice that if the resistance is purely viscous, varying as the 
first power of v, then the x and y components of the motion can 
be handled entirely separately, even though the problem is not 
that of idealized free fail. Thus, although one can always take 
a statement of Newton's law as the starting point of any problem 
of a particle exposed to forces, the way of proceeding from there 
to the analysis of the complete motion may depend critically on 
the precise nature of the individual problem. 


One of the most important of all dynamical problems is that 
of a mass attracted toward a given point by a force proportional 
to its distance from that point. If the motion is assumed to be 
confined to the x axis we have 

F(x) = -kx ( 7 ~ 38 ) 

A good approximation to this situation is provided by an object 
on a very smooth horizontal table (e.g., with air suspension) and 
a horizontal coiled spring, as shown in Fig. 7-26(a). The object 
would normally rest at a position in which the spring is neither 
compressed nor extended. The force brought into play by a 
slight displacement of the mass in either direction is then well 
described by Eq. (7-38). The constant k is called the spring 

226 Using Newton's law 



Fig. 7-26 (a) Mass-spring sysiem on a frictionless 
horizontal surface. (b) Mass hanging front a vertical 
spring. (c) Graph of force versus displacement with a 
linear force law; the equilibrium silualions O and O' 
correspond to (a) and (b), respeclivety. 

constant and is measured in newtons per meter. This linear force 
law for a spring was discovered by Robert Hooke in 1676 and is 
named after him. ' An even simpler arrangement in practice, 
although slightly more complicated theoretically, is to suspend 
a mass at the bottom end of a vertical spring, as in Fig. 7-26(b). 
In this case the normal resting situation already involves an 
extension of the spring, sufficient to support the weight of the 
object. A further displacement up or down from this equilibrium 
position leads, however, to a net restoring force exactly of the 
form of Eq. (7-38). This is indicated in Fig. 7-26(c), which shows 
the magnitude of the force exerted by the spring as a funetion 
of its extension y. If one takes as a new origin of this graph the 
point O', then one has a net restoring force (F — mg) propor- 
tional to the extra displacement (y — ya). 

The great importance of this dynamical problem of a mass 
on a spring is that the behavior of very many physical systems 
under small displacements from equilibrium obeys the same basic 
equation as Eq. (7-38). We shall diseuss this in more detail in 
Chapter 10; for the present we shall just concern ourselves with 
solving the problem as such. 

J He first announced it in a famous anagram— ceiiinosssttuv— which 2 years 
later he revealed as a Latin sentence, "ut tensio, sic vis" ("as. the cxtension, 
so the force"). By this device (popular in his day) Hooke could claim prior 
publication for his discovery without actually telling his competitors what 
it was! 

227 Simple harmonic motion 

This makes a good case in which to begin with the computer 
method of solution rather than with formal mathematics. The 
basic equation of motion, expressed in the form ma = F, is as 

d\ . 


Rewriting this as 

d 2 x k 

dfi m X 

we recognize that k/m is a constant, of dimension (time) 2 . 
Denoting this by w 2 , our basic equation thus becomes 


= —W X 


We can read this as a direct statement of the way in which dx/dt 
is changing with time and can proceed to calculate the ap- 
proximate change of dx/dt in a small interval of time At : 

i( i) - - 

di \<//^ 

and so 

(f)~- w! 




This is the reverse of the process by which d 2 x/dt 2 was originally 
defined (cf. Chapter 3). 

Fig. 7-27 Displace- 
ment versus time in 
simple harmonic 

228 Using Newton's law 

Suppose, to be specific, that we start out at f = with 
x = x and v (= dx/di) = v both positive, as shown in Fig. 
7-27. Then at time / = A/ we have 

x *» xo + f o Ar 

rfx 2 » 

— « i>o - w A;oAr 

The displacement is a little bigger, the slope a little less. Using 
these new values, we take another step of A/, and so on. Several 
features can be read from Eq. (7-41): 

1. As long as x is positive, the slope dx/dt decreases when 
we go from t to / + A/. That is, \idx/dt is positive it gets smaller; 
if dx/dt is negative it becomes more negative. 

2. The rate of change of dx/dt is proportional to x. The 
graph has its greatest curvature at the largest x, and as x — ► it 
becomes almost a straight line. 

3. As soon as x becomes negative, dx/dt becomes less 
negative or more positive with each time increment A/. 

Using these considerations, we can construct the picture of 
a curve that is always curving toward the line x = (i.e., the 
t axis), necessarily forming a repetitive wavy pattern. 

Now anyone who has ever drawn graphs of trigonometric 
functions will recognize that Fig. 7-27 looks remarkably like a 
sine or cosine curve. More specifically, it suggests a comparison 
with the following analytic expression for the distance x as a 
function of time : 

x = A sin(af + ^o) 

where A is the maximum value attained by x during the motion, 
a a constant with the dimension (time) -1 , and <p an adjustable 
angle that allows us to fit the value of x at t = 0. 

Testing this trial function against the original differential 
equation of motion [Eq. (7-40)] requires differentiating x twice 
with respect to /: 

v = — = aA cos(atf + <^o) 


a = -— = —oc A sin(a/ + <f>o) — — a x 
at 2 

We see that the solution does indeed fit, provided that we put 
a = w. This then brings us to the following final result: 

229 Simple harmonic motion 

„v 1/2 

x(t ) = A sin(w/ + *?o) where w = I — J (7-42a) 


Equation (7-42a) is the characteristic equation of what is 
called simple harmonic motion (SHM), and any system that obeys 
this equation of motion is called a harmonic oscillator. The 
constant A is the amplitude of the motion, and v>o (Gk: phi) is 
what is called the initial phase (at / = 0). The complete argument, 
at + ip , of the sine function is called just "the phase" of the 
motion at any given instant. The result represented by Eq. (7-42a) 
could be equally well expressed by writing x as a cosine function, 
rather than a sine function, of /: 

x(l) = A cos(at + <p' ) (7-42b) 

with an appropriate value of the constant <p' . This form of the 
solution is found more convenient for some purposes. 

The harmonic motion is characterized by its period, T, which 
defines successive equal intervals of time at the end of which 
the state of the motion reproduces itself exactly in both dis- 
placement and velocity. The value of T is readily obtained from 
Eqs. (7-42) by noting that each time the phase angle (at + ip ) 
changes by 2w, both x and v have passed through a complete 
cycle of variation. Thus we can put 

<pi = uti + </>o 
tpi + 2vr = o>(/i + T) + vo 

Therefore, by subtraction, 

2w = 10T 

/' (r) ' (7-43) 


The form of this result corresponds to one's commonsense 
knowledge that if m gets bigger the oscillation goes more slowly, 
and if the spring is madc stiffcr (largcr k) the oscillation becomes 
more rapid. 

Example. A spring of negligible mass hangs vertically from 
a fixed point. When a mass of 2 kg is hung from the bottom end 
of the spring, the spring is stretched by 3 cm. What is the period 
of simple harmonic vibration of this system? 

First we calculatc the foree constant k. The gravitational 

230 Using Newton's law 

force on the mass is 2 X 9.8 N = 19.6 N. This force causes an 
extension of 0.03 m; therefore, k = 19.6/0.03 = 653 N/m. 
Using Eq. (7-43) we then have 

. 1/2 

"" sec 

'-*(&) =°- 35! 

(You might like to note that we need not have specified the mass. 
Any spring that extends 3 cm when a certain mass is hung on it 
will have a vibration period of 0.35 sec with this same mass. 


Fitting the initial conditions 

We have come to recognize, both as a general principle and 
through various examples, that the complete solution of any 
problem in the use of Newton's law requires not only a knowledge 
of the force law but also the speciflcation of two independent 
quantities that correspond to the constants of integration intro- 
duced as we go from a (= d 2 x/dt 2 ) to x. Most commonly we 
have talked of giving the initial position, x , and the initial 
velocity, v . Here, in our analysis of the motion of a harmonic 
oscillator, we also need initial conditions or their equivalent. 
Actually they appear as the two constants A and <p >n Eq- (7-42). 
We have already identified A as the amplitude of the motion and 
<p as the initial phase. If we are given the values of x and v we 
can readily solve for A and <po as follows: 
From Eq. (7-42a), 

x = A sin(co/ + ifio) 

= ^ = wA cos(o>/ + *>o) (7-44) 



xo = A sin v>o 
Vq = o>A cos v>o 

It follows that 




tan^o = 


231 More about simple harmonic motion 

A geometrical representation of SHM 

There is a very basic connection between simple harmonic 
motion and uniform motion in a circular path. This fact leads to 
a particularly simple way of displaying and visualizing SHM. 
Imagine that a horizontal disk, of radius A, rotates with constant 
angular speed u about a vertical axis through its center. Suppose 
that a peg P is mounted on the rim of the disk as shown in Fig. 
7-28(a). Then, if the disk is viewed edge on (horizontally) the 
peg will seem to move back and forth along a horizontal straight 
line [Fig. 7-28(b)]. Its motion along this line will correspond 
exactly to Eq. (7-42a) if the angular position of the peg at t = 
is correctly chosen so that the angle SOP in Fig. 7-28(c) is equal 
to ut + <pq. In this representation the quantity w is seen as the 
actual angular velocity of P as it travels around the circle. The 
peg has a velocity v that changes direction but always has the 
magnitude u A. Resolving v parallel to Ox at once gives Eq. 
(7-44). Thus the motion of the point B in Fig. 7-28(c) corre- 

Fig. 7-28 (a) Peg on 
a uniformly rotating 
disk. (b) Displace- 
ment of the peg as 
viewed in a plane con- 
laining the disk. 
(c) Detailed relation 
of circular motion to 
simple harmonic 

232 Using Newton's !aw 

sponds in every respect to that of a particle performing SHM 
along the x axis. 

Dynamical relation between SHM and circular motion 

Although the analysis just described is a purely geometrical one, 
it suggests a close dynamical connection, also, between the actual 
linear motion of a harmonic oscillator and the projection of a 
uniform circular motion. The acceptance of F = ma means that 
the same motion implies the same force causing it, whatever the 
particular origin of the force may be. This equivalence can be 
understood with the help of Fig. 7-29. A particle of mass m is 
kept moving in a circle of radius A by means of a string attached 
to a fixed support at the center of the circle, O. If the particle 
has a constant speed, v, the tension, T, in the string must be 
given by 

T = 


Here v 2 / 'A is the magnitude of the instantaneous acceleration, 
a„ of m toward the center of the circle. 

Now the total force and the total acceleration at any instant 
can be resolved into their x and y components in a rectangular 
coordinate system. (Normally we would not be interested in 
doing this, because T and a, have well-defined constant mag- 

Fig. 7-29 Dynamical 
relationship between 
circular motion and 
linear harmonic 

233 More about simple harmonic motion 


nitudes.) Taking the x components alone, we have 



F x = - T cos e = — cos e 




a x = r cos 8 


Thus the x component of the complete vector equation, F = ma, 
is F x = ma x , with the values of F x and a x stated above. 

In order to display the dynamical identity of this component 
motion with SHM, we can take the expressions for F x and a x 
separately, introducing the angular velocity « and putting v = 
uA. We then have 

F x - —mco 2 Acosd = —mw 2 x 
a x = —u 2 Acos8 = — u 2 x 

The first of these equations defines a restoring force proportional 
to displacement, exactly in accord with our initial statement of 
Hooke's law [Eq. (7-38)]. The second corresponds exactly to 
the equation [Eq. (7-40)] that was our starting point for the 
kinematic analysis of the problem: 

d x 2 

Thus we see that the dynamical correspondence is complete in 
every respect. It tells us, moreover, that we could, if we wished, 
go the other way and treat a uniform circular motion as a super- 
position of two simple harmonic motions at right angles. This 
is, in fact, an extremely important and useful procedure in some 
contexts, although we shall not take time to follow it up here 
and now. 

7-1 Two identical gliders, each of mass m, are being towed through 
the air in tandem, as shown. Initially they are traveling at a constant 
speed and the tension in the tow rope A is 7"o. The tow plane then 
begins to accelerate with an acceleration a. What are the tensions in 
A and B immediately aftcr this acceleration begins? 

234 Using Newton's law 


7-2 Two blocks, of masses M = 3 kg and m = 2 kg, are in contact 
on a horizontal table. A constant horizontal force F = 5 N is applied 
to block M as shown. There is a constant frictional force of 2 N be- 
tween the table and the block m but no frictional force between the 
table and the first block M . 

(a) Calculate the acceleration of the two blocks. 

(b) Calculate the force of contact between the blocks. 

7-3 A sled of mass m is pulled by a force of magnitude P at angle 8 
to the horizontal (see the figure). The sled slides over a horizontal 
surface of snow. It experiences a tangential resistive force equal to 
M times the perpcndicular force W exerted on the sled by the snow. 

(a) Draw an isolation diagram showing all the forces exerted 
on the sled. 

(b) Write the equations corresponding to F = ma for the 
horizontal and vertical components of the motion. 

(c) Obtain an expression for the horizontal acceleration in 
terms of P, 6, m, n, and g. 

(d) For a given magnitude of P, find what value of 6 gives the 
biggest acceleration. 

7-4 A block of mass mi rests on a frictionless horizontal surface; 
it is connected by a massless string, passing through a frictionless 
eyelet, to a second block of mass mi that rests on a frictionless incline 
(see the figure). 

(a) Draw isolation diagrams for the masses and write the equa- 
tion of motion for each one separately. 

(b) Find the tension in the string and the acceleration of mi. 

(c) Verify that, for 6 = jt/2, your answers reducc to the ex- 
pected results. 

7-5 In the figure, P is a pulley of negligible mass. An external force 
F acts on it as indicated. 

(a) Find the relation between the tensions on the right-hand 
and left-hand sides of the pulley. Find also the relation between F 
and the tensions. 

(b) What relation among the motions of m. M, and P is pro- 
vided by the prescncc of the string? 

(c) Use the above results and Newton's law as applied to each 
block to find the accelerations of m, M, and P in terms of m. M, g, 
and F. Check that the results make sense for various specialized or 
simplified situations. 

7-6 A man is raising himsclf and the platform on which he stands 
with a uniform acceleration of 5 m/sec 2 by means of the rope-and- 
pulley arrangement shown. The man has mass 100 kg and the plat- 
form is 50 kg. Assumc that the pulley and rope are massless and 
move without frietion, and neglect any tilting effects of the platform. 

235 Problems 

Assume g = 10m/sec 2 . 

(a) What are the tensions in the ropes A, B, and C? 

(b) Draw isolation diagrams for the man and the platform and 
draw a separate force diagram for each, showing all the forces acting 
on them. Label each force and clearly indicate its direction. 

(c) What is the force of contact exerted on the man by the 
platform ? 

7-7 In an equal-arm arrangement, a mass 5/no is balanced by the 
masses 3mo and 2mo, which are connected by a string over a pulley 
of negligible mass and prevented from moving by the string A (see 
the figure). Analyze what happens if the string A is suddenly severed, 
e.g., by means of a lighted match. 

"S - 




7-8 A prisoner in jail decides to escape by sliding to freedom down 
a rope provided by an accomplice. He attaches the top end of the 
rope to a hook outside his window; the bottom end of the rope hangs 
clear of the ground. The rope has a mass of 10 kg, and the prisoner 
has a mass of 70 kg. The hook can stand a puli of 600 N without 
giving way. If the prisoner's window is 15 m above the ground, what 
is the least velocity with which he can reach the ground, starting from 
rest at the top end of the rope? 

7-9 (a) Suppose that a uniform rope of length L, resting on a fric- 
tionless horizontal surface, is accelerated along the direction of its 
length by means of a force F pulling it at one end. Derive an expression 
for the tension T in the rope as a function of position along its length. 
How is the expression for Tchanged if the rope is accelerated vertically 
in a constant gravitational field ? 

(b) A mass M is accelerated by the rope in part (a). Assuming 
the mass of the rope to be w, calculate the tension for the horizontal 
and vertical cases. 

7-10 In 1931 F. Kirchner performed an experiment to determine the 
charge-to-mass ratio, e/m, for electrons. An electron gun (see the 
figure) produced a beam of electrons that passed through two "gates," 
each gate consisting of a pair of parallel plates with the upper plates 
connected to an alternating voltage source. Electrons could pass 

236 Using Newton's law 


-K o- 


straight through a gate only if the voltage on the upper plate were 
momentarily zerc. Wilh the gates separated by a distance / equal to 
50.35 cm, and with a gate voltage varying sinusoidally at a frequency 
/ equal to 2.449 X 10 7 Hz (1 Hz = 1 cycle/sec), Kirchner found that 
electrons could pass completely undeflected through both gates when 
the initial accelerating voltage (K ) was set at 1735 V. Under these 
conditions the flight-time between the gates corresponded to one 
half-cycle of the alternating voltage. 

(a) What was the electron speed, deduced directly from / and /? 

(b) What value of e I m is implied by the data ? 

(c) Were corrections due to special relativity significant? 
[For Kirchner's original paper, see Ann. Physik, 8, 975 (1931).] 

7-11 A certain loaded car is known to have its center of gravity half- 
way between the front and rear axles. It is found that the drive wheels 
(at the rear) start slipping when the car is driven up a 20° incline. 
How far back must the load (weighing a quarter the weight of the 
empty car) be shifted for the car to get up a 25° slope? (The distance 
between the axles is 10 ft.) 

7-12 A child sleds down a snowy hillside, starting from rest. The 
hill has a 15° slope, with a long stretch of level field at the foot. The 
child starts 50 ft up the slope and continues for 100 ft on the level 
field before coming to a complete stop. Find the coefficient of friction 
between the sled and the snow, assuming that it is constant throughout 
the ride. Neglect air resistance. 

7-13 A beam of electrons from an electron gun passes between two 
parallel plates, 3 mm apart and 2 cm long. After leaving the plates 
the electrons travel to form a spot on a fluorescent screen 25 cm 
farther on. It is desired to get the spot to deflect vertically through 
3 cm when 100 V are applied to the deflector plates. What must be 
the accelerating voltage Vo on the electron gun? (Show first, in 
general, that if the linear displacement caused by the deflector plates 
can be neglected, the required voltage is given by V o = V(lD/2Yd), 
where Y is the linear displacement of the spot on the screen. The 
notation is that used on p. 197.) 

237 Problem s 

7-14 A ball of mass m is attached to one end of a string of length /. 
It is known that the string will break if pulled with a force equal to 
nine times the weight of the ball. The ball, supported by a frictionless 
table, is made to travel a horizontal circular path, the other end of the 
string being attached to a fixed point O. What is the largest number 
of revolutions per unit time that the mass can make without breaking 
the string? 

7-75 A mass of 100 g is attached to one end of a very light rigid rod 
20 cm long. The other end of the rod is attached to the shaft of a 
motor so that the rod and the mass are caused to rotate in a vertical 
circle with a constant angular velocity of 7 rad/sec. 

(a) Draw a force diagram showing all the forces acting on the 
mass for an arbitrary angle of the rod to the downward vertical. 

(b) What are the magnitude and the direction of the force exerted 
by the rod on the mass when'the rod points in a horizontal direction, 
i.e., at0 = 90°? 

7-16 You are fiying along in your Sopwith Camel at 60 mph and 
2000-ft altitude in the vicinity of Saint Michel when suddenly you 
notice that the Red Baron is just 300 ft behind you fiying at 90 mph. 
Recalling from captured medical data that the Red Baron can with- 
stand only 4 g's of acceleration before blacking out, whereas you can 
withstand 5 g's, you decide on the following plan. You dive straight 
down at full power, then level out by fiying in a circular are that comes 
out horizontally just above the ground. Assume that your speed is 
constant after you start to puli out and that the acceleration you 
experience in the are is 5 g's. Since you know that the Red Baron 
will follow you, you are assured he will black out and crash. Assuming 
that both planes dive with 2 g's ucceleration from the same initial 
point (but with initial speeds given above), to what altitude must you 
deseend so that the Red Baron, in trying to follow your subsequent 
are, must either crash or black out? Assuming that the Red Baron 
is a poor shot and must get within 100 ft of your plane to shoot you 
down, will your plan succeed ? After starting down you recall reading 
that the wings of your plane will fail off if you excced 300 mph. Is 
your plan sound in view of this limitation on your plane? 

7-17 A curve of 300 m radius on a level road is banked for a speed 
of 25 m/sec (« 55 mph) so that the force exerted on a car by the road 
is normal to the surface at this speed. 

(a) What is the angle of bank ? 

(b) The frietion between tires and road can provide a maximum 
tangential force equal to 0.4 of the force normal to the road surface. 
What is the highest speed at which the car can takc this curve without 

7-18 A large mass M hangs (stationary) at the end of a string that 

238 Using Ncwton's law 

passes through a smooth tube to a small mass m that whirls around 
in a circular path of radius / sin 6, where / is the length of the string 
from m to the top end of the tube (see the figure). Write down the 
dynamical equations that apply to each mass and show that m must 
complete one orbit in a time of 2ir(lm/gM) v2 . Consider whether 
there is any restriction on the value of the angle 6 in this motion. 
7-19 A model rocket rests on a frictionless horizontal surface and is 
joined by a string of length / to a fixed point so that the rocket moves 
in a horizontal circular path of radius /. The string will break if its 
tension exceeds a value T. The rocket engine provides a thrust F of 
constant magnitude along the rocket's direction of motion. The 
rocket has a mass m that does not decrease appreciably with time. 

(a) Starting from rcst at / = 0, at what later time / 1 is the rocket 
traveling so fast that the string breaks ? Ignore air resistance. 

(b) What was the magnitude of the rocket's instantaneous net 
acceleration at time 1 1/2? Obtain the answer in terms of F, T, and m. 

(c) What distance does the rocket travel between the time t\ 
when the string breaks and the time 2/i? The rocket engine continues 
to operate after the string breaks. 

7-20 It has been suggested that the biggest nuclear accelerator we 
are likely to make will be an evacuated pipe running around the 
earth's equator. The strength of the earth's magnetic field at the 
equator is about 0.3 G or 3 X 10 -5 MKS units (N-sec/C-m). With 
what speed would an atom of lead (at. wt. 207), singly ionized (i.e., 
carrying one elementary charge), have to move around such an orbit 
so that the magnetic force provided the correct centripetal acceleration? 
(e = 1.6 X 10~ 10 C.) Through what voltage would a singly ionized 
lead atom have to be accelerated to give it this correct orbital speed ? 

7-21 A trick cyclist rides his bike around a "wali of death" in the 
form of a vertical cylinder (see the figure). The maximum frictional 
force parallel to the surface of the cylinder is equal to a fraction n of 
the normal force exerted on the bike by the wali. 

(a) At what speed must the cyclist go to avoid slipping down? 

239 Problems 

(b) At what angle (<p) to the horizontal must he be inclined? 

(c) If m ~ 0.6 (typical of rubber tires on dry roads) and the 
radius of the cylinder is 5 m, at what minimum speed must the cyclist 
ride, and what angle does he make with the horizontal? 

7-22 The following expression gives the resistive force exerted on a 
sphere of radius r moving at speed v through air. It is valid over a 
very wide range of speeds. 

R(c) = 3.1 X 10 -4 r«J + 0.87/-V 

where R is in N, r in m, and v in m/sec. Consider water drops falling 
under their own weight and reaching a terminal speed. 

(a) For what range of values of small r is the terminal speed 
determined within 1% by the first term alone in the expression for 

(b) For what range of values of Iarger r is the terminal speed 
determined within 1% by the second term alone? 

(c) Calculate the terminal speed of a raindrop of radius 2 mm. 
If there were no air resistance, from what height would it fail from 
rest before reaching this speed? 

7-23 An experiment is performed with the Millikan oil-drop ap- 
paratus. The plates are 8 mm apart. The expcriment is done with 
oil droplets of density 896 kg/m 3 . The droplets are timed between 
two horizontal lines that are 2.58 mm apart. With the plates un- 
charged, a droplet is observed to take 23.6 sec to fail from one line to 
the other. When the upper plate is made 1100 V positive with respect 
to the lower, the droplet rises and takes 22.0 sec to cover the same 
distance. Assume that the resistive force is 3.1 X 10~ 4 n; (MKS units). 

(a) What is the radius of the droplet? 

(b) What is its net charge, measured as a number of elementary 
charges? (e = 1.6 X 10" 19 C.) 

(c) What voltage would hold the droplet stationary? [Use the 
precise value of the charge deduccd in part (b)]. 

7-24 Two solid plastic spheres of the same material but of different 
radii, R and 2R, are used in a Millikan expcriment. The spheres carry 
equal charges q. The Iarger sphere is observed to reach terminal 
speeds as follows: (1) plates uncharged: terminal speed = vo (down- 
ward), and (2) plates charged: terminal speed = lm (upward). As- 
suming that the resistive force on a sphere of radius r at speed o is 
ciro, find, in terms of i>o and vi, the corresponding terminal speeds 
for the smaller sphere. 

7-25 Analyze in retrospect the legcndary Galilean experiment that 
took place at the leaning tower of Pisa. Imagine such an experiment 
done with two iron spheres, of radii 2 and 10 cm, respectively, dropped 
simultaneously from a height of about 15 m. Make caleulations to 

240 Using Ncwion's lavv 

r rn: n _L 

2 m 


determine, approximately, the difference in the times at which they 
hit the ground. Do you think this could be detected without special 
mcasuringdevices? (Density of iron « 7500 kg/m 3 .) 

7-26 Estimate the terminal speed of fail (in air) of an air-filled toy 
balloon, with a diameter of 30 cm and a mass (not counting the air 
inside) of about 0.5 g. About how long would it take for the balloon 
to come to within a few percent of this terminal speed? Try making 
some real observations of balloons inflated to different sizes. 

7-27 A spring that obeys Hooke's law in both extension and com- 
pression is extended by 10 cm when a mass of 2 kg is hung from it. 

(a) What is the spring constant k ? 

(b) The spring and the 2-kg mass are placed on a smooth table. 
The mass is pulled so as to extend the spring by 5 cm and is then 
released at / = 0. What is the equation of the ensuing motion? 

(c) I f, instead of being released from rest, the mass were started 
off at x = 5 cm with a speed of 1 m/sec in the direetion of increasing 
x, what would be the equation of motion? 

7-28 When the mass is doubled in diagram (a), the end of the spring 
deseends an additional distance //. What is the frequency of oscillation 
for the arrangement in diagram (b)? AH individual springs shown 
are identical. 

7-29 Any object, parlially or wholly submerged in a fluid, is buoyed 
up by a foree equal to the weight of the displaced fluid. A uniform 
cylinder of density p and length / is floating with its axis vertical, in a 
fluid of density po. What is the frequency of small-amplitude vertical 
oscillations of the cylinder? 

7-30 (a) A small bead of mass m is attached to the midpoint of a 
string (itself of negligible mass). The string is of length L and is under 
constant tension T. Find the frequency of the SHM that the mass 
deseribes when given a slight transverse displacement. 

(b) Find the frequency in the case where the mass is attached 
at a distance D from one end instead of the midpoint. 

7-31 A block rests on a tabletop that is undergoing simple harmonic 
motion of amplitude A and period T. 

(a) If the oscillation is vertical, what is the maximum value of A 
that will allow the block to remain always in contaet with the table? 

(b) If the oscillatior. is horizontal, and the coefficient of frietion 
betwcen block and tabletop is p., what is the maximum value of A that 
will allow the block to remain on the surface without slipping? 

7-32 The springs of a car of mass 1 200 kg give it a period when empty 
of 0.5 sec for small vertical oscillations. 

(a) How far does the car sink down when a driver and three 
passengers, each of mass 75 kg, get into the car? 

241 Problems 

(b) The car with its passengers is traveling along a horizontal 
road whcn it suddenly runs onto a piece of new road surface, raised 
2 in. above the old surface. Assume that this suddenly raises the 
wheels and the bottom ends of the springs through 2 in. before the 
body of the car begins to movc upward. In the ensuing rebound, are 
the passengers thrown clear of their seats? Consider the maximum 
acceleration of the resulting simple harmonic motion. 

242 Using Newton's law 

If it universally appears, by experiments and astronomical 
obseruations, that all bodies about the earth gravitate 
towards the earth . . . in proportion to the auantity of matter 
that they severally contain; that the moon likewise . . . 
gravitates towards the earth . . . and all the planets one 
towards another; and the comets in like manner towards 
the sun; we must, in conseauence of this rule, universally 
allow that all bodies whatsoever are endowed with a principle 
of mutual gravitation. 

newton, Principia (1686) 


Universal gravitation 


in chapters 6 and 7 we have built up the kind of foundation in 
dynamics that Newton himself was the first to establish. In a 
nutshell, it is the quantitative identification of force as the cause 
of acceleration, coupled with the purely kinematic problem of 
relating accelerations to velocities and displacements. We shall 
now consider, as a topic i n its own right, the first and most 
splendid example of how a law of force was deduced from the 
study of motions. 

It is convcnient, and historically not unrcasonable, to con- 
sider separately three aspects of this great discovery: 

1. The analysis o f the data concerning the orbits of the 
planets around the sun, to the approximation that these orbits 
are circular with the sun at the center. Several people besides 
Newton were closely associated with this problem. 

2. The proof that gravitation is universal, in the sense that 
the law of force that governs the motion of objects near the 
earth's surface is also the law that controls the motion of celestial 
bodies. It seems clcar that Newton was the true discoverer of this 
result, through his analysis of the motion of the moon. 

3. The proof that the true planetary orbits, which are 
ellipses rather than circles, are explained by an inverse-square 
law of force. This achievement, certainly, was the product of 
Newton's genius alone. 

In the present chapter we shall be able to discuss the first 
of these questions quitc fully, using only our basic results in the 


kinematics and dynamics of particles. The second question 
requires us to learn (as Newton himself originally had to) how 
to analyze the gravitating properties of a body, like the earth, 
which is so obviously not a geometrical point when viewed from 
close to its surface. We shall present one approach to the prob- 
lem here and complcte the story in Chapter 11, where this special 
feature of the gravitational problem is discussed. The third 
question, concerning the exact mathematical description of the 
orbits, is something that we shall not go into at all at this stage; 
such orbit problems will be the exclusive concern of Chapter 13. 


We have described in Chapter 2 how the knowledge of the 
motions of the classical planets — Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, 
and Saturn — was already exceedingly well developed by the time 
of the astronomer Ptolemy around 150 a.d. By this we mean 
that the angular positions of these planets as a function of time 
had been catalogucd with remarkable accuracy and over a long 
enough span for their periodic returns to the same position in 
the sky to bc cxtremely well known. We have pointed out pre- 
viously, however, that the interpretation of such results depends 
on the model of the solar system that one uses. Let us now look 
more carefully at the original observational data and the con- 
clusions that can be drawn from them. 

The first thing to recognize is that, whether or not one 
accepts the earth as the real center of the universe, it is the 
center as far as all primary observations are concerned. From 
this vantage point, the motion of each planet can be described, 
to a first approximation, as a small circle (the epicycle) whose 
center moves around a larger circle (the deferent). Now there 
are some facts about the motions of two particular planets— 
Mercury and Venus— that point the way to some far-reaching 
conclusions. These are 

1. That for these two planets, the time for the center C 
of the epicycle [Fig. 8-1 (a)] to travel once around the deferent 
is exactly 1 solar year — i.e., the same time that it takes the sun 
to complcte one circuit around the ecliptic. 

2. The planets Mercury and Venus never get far from the 
sun. They are always found within a limited angular range from 
the line joining the earth to the sun (about ±22J° for Mercury, 

246 Universal gravitation 

Fig. 8-1 (a) Motions 
of .'/.'(■ sun and Venus 
as seen from the 
earlh. Venus always 
lies within the angular 
range ±$ m of the 
sun' s direction. 
(6) Heliocentric 
picture of the same 

±46° for Venus). Both of these facts are beautifully accounted 
for if we go over to the heliocentric, Copernican system [Fig. 
8— l(b)]. We see that the larger circle of Fig. 8-l(a) corresponds 
in this case to the earth's own orbit around the sun, of radius rs, 
and the smaller circle — the epicycle — represents the orbit of the 
other planet (Venus or Mercury, as the case may be). Given 
this interpretation, we can proceed to make quantitative in- 
ferences about the radii of the planetary orbits themselves. This 
is a crucial advance of the Copernican scheme over the Ptolemaic. 
Although Ptolemy had excellent data, they were for him just the 
source of purely geometric parameters, but with Copernicus we 
arrive at the basis of a truly physical model. Thus in Fig. 8-1 (b) 
the maximum angular deviation, d m , of the planet P from the 
earth-sun line ES defines the planet's orbit radius r by the 

— = sin i 

(r B > r) 


The radius of the earth's orbit is clearly a natural unit for mea- 
suring other astronom ical distances, and has long been used 
for this purpose: 

1 astronomical unit (AU) 

mean distance from earth to sun 
(1.496 X 10" m) 

In terms of this unit, we then have 

247 The orbits of the planets 

For Mercury: r « sin 225° 
For Venus: r « sin 46° 

0.38 AU 
0.72 AU 

When it comes to the other planets (Mars, Jupiter, and 
Saturn) the tables are turned. These planets are not closely 
linked to the sun's position; they progress through the full 360° 
with respect to the earth-sun line. This can be readily explained 
if we interchange the roles of the two component circular motions, 
so that the large primary circle (the deferent) is taken to be the 
orbit of the planet, now larger than that of the earth, and the 
epicycle is seen as the expression of the earth 's orbit around the 
sun. In the case of Jupiter, for example, the Ptolemaic picture is 
represented by Fig. 8-2(a) and the Copernican picture by Fig. 
8-2(b). Thus the periodic angular swing, ±0 m , of the epicycle is 
now related to the ratio of orbital radii through the equation 


(r B < r) 

(8-1 b) 

in which the roles of r and r B are reversed with respect to Eq. 
(8-la). Ptolemy's recorded values of 6 m for Mars, Jupiter, and 
Saturn were about 41°, 1 1°, and 6°, respectively. These would 
then lead to the following results: 

For Mars: r « esc 41° « 1.5 AU 
For Jupiter: r « esc 11° « 5.2 AU 
For Saturn: r « esc 6° ~ 9.5 AU 

Thus with the Copernican seheme (and this was its great triumph) 
it became possible to use the long-established data to construct 

Fig. 8-2 (a) Motions 
of the sun and 
Jupiter as seen from 
the earth. The 
angle 8 m here 
charaeterizes the 
magnitude of the 
retrograde (epicyclic) 
motion. (6) Helio- 
centric picture of the 
same situation. 

248 Universal gravitation 

Fig. 8-3 Universe 
according lo 
(Reproduced from 
his hisloric work, 
De Revolutionibus.) 

a picture of the planets in their orbits in order of their increasing 
distance from the sun. Figure 8-3 is a reproduction of the 
historic diagram by which Copernicus displayed the results in 
his book {De Revolutionibus) in 1543. 

The data with which Copernicus worked (and Ptolemy, too, 
1400 years before him) were actually far too good to permit a 
simple picture of the planets describing circular paths at con- 
stant speed around a common center. Thus Copernicus carried 
out a detailed analysis to find out how far the center of the 
orbit of each planet was offset from the sun. But even with this 
adjustment, the detailed change with time of the angular positions 
of the planets could not be fitted unless the motion around the 
orbit was made nonuniform. Copernicus, like Ptolemy before 
him, introduced auxiliary circular motions to deal with the 
problem, but this, as we now know, was not the answer and we 
shall not discuss its compIexities. For the moment we shall use 
the basic idealization of uniform circular orbits and set aside 
until later the rcfincmcnts that were first mastered by Kepler 
when he recognized the planctary paths as being ellipses. 


The problem of determining the periodicities of the planets, like 
that of finding the shapes of their orbits, must begin with what 

249 Planctary pcriods 

Fig. &-4 (a) Relative 
posilions of the sun, 
the earth, and Jupiter 
at the beginning 
(SEiJi) and end 
(SE2J2) ofone 
synodic period. 
(b) Comparable dia- 
gram for the sun, the 
earth, and Venus, 
allowing for the fact 
that Venus must be 
offset from the line 
between sun and earth 
ifit is to be visible. 

E t 




*£ 2 

\ / 
\ / 
\ / 1 

i v > / 






E x 





can be observed from the moving platform that is our earth. 
The recurring situation that can be most easily recognized is the 
one in which the sun, the earth, and another planet return, after 
some characteristic time, to the same positions relative to one 
another. The length of this recurrence time is known as the 
synodic period of the planet in question. In terms of a helio- 
centric model of the solar system, this is easily related to the 
true (sidereal) period of one complete orbit of the planet around 
the sun. 

Consider first the case of one of the outer planets, say 
Jupiter. Figure 8-4(a) shows a situation that can be observed 
from time to time. The positions of the sun, the earth, and 
Jupiter lie in a straight line. Observationally this could be 
established by finding the date on which Jupiter passes aeross 
the celestial meridian at midnight, thus placing it 180° away 
from the sun. ' 

Now if one such alignment is represented by the positions 
Ei and J t of the earth and Jupiter, the next one will oecur rather 
more than 1 ycar later, when the earth has gained one whole 
revolution on Jupiter. This is shown by the positions E 2 and J 2 . 
Jupiter has traveled through the angular distance 9 while the 
earth goes through 2k + 6. Both Ptolemy and Copernicus knew 

"The celestial meridian is the projection, on the celestial sphere, of a plane 
containing the earth's axis and the point on the earth's surface where the 
observer is located. It is thus a great cirele on the celestial sphere, running 
from north to south through the observer's zenith point, vertically above him. 
Noon is the instant at which the sun crosses this celestial meridian in its 
daily journey from cast to west. 

250 Universal gravitation 

that the length of the synodic period separating these two con- 
figurations is close to 399 days. Let us denote the synodic period 
in general by the symbol r. Then if the earth makes ns complete 
revolutions per unit time and Jupiter makes nj revolutions per 
unit time, we have 

H£r = rtjr + 1 

But n E and tij are the reciprocals of the periods of revolution 
T e and Tj of the two planets. Thus we have 

and solving this for Tj we have 

Tj = - T i. (8-2a) 

1 - T e /t 

Putting Tb/t ~ 365/399 w 0.915, we thus find that 

The same type of observation and calculation can be applied 
to Mars and Saturn and the other outer planets that we now know. 
When we come to Venus and Mercury, however, the situation, 
as with the determination of orbital radii, is a little different. 
First is the practical difficulty that we cannot, at least with the 
naked eye, see these planets when they are in line with the sun, 
because it would rcquire looking directly toward the sun to do 
so. We can easily get around this by considering any other 
situation [see Fig. 8-4(b)] in which the angle between the direc- 
tions ES and EV is measured. This particular diagram shows 
Venus as a morning star, appearing above the horizon 1 hr or so 
before the sun as the earth rotates from west to east. The same 
value of the angle a will recur after one synodic period. This 
takes over l^yr — about 583 days, to be more precise. In this 
case, however, it is Venus that has gaincd one revolution on the 
earth. Thus instead of the form of the equation that applies to 
the outer planets, we now have 

tivr = ngt + 1 
leading to the result 

1 + Tb/t 

251 Planetary periods 

Putting T E /r « 365/583 « 0.627, we find that 

7V« ^»224 days 

It is a curious fact that Copernicus, in the introductory 
general account of his model of the solar system, quotes values 
of the planetary periods which are so rough that some of them 
could even be called wrong. These values are marked on his 
diagram (Fig. 8-3) and are repeated in his text: Saturn, 30 yr; 
Jupiter, 12yr; Mars, 2yr; Venus, 9 months; Mercury, 80 days. 
The worst cases are Mars (2 yr instead of about I i) and Venus 
(9 months instead of about 7$). This seems to havc led some 
peoplc to think that Copernicus had only a crude knowledge of 
the facts, which was certainly not the case. Perhaps he was 
careless about quoting the periods because his real interest was 
in the geometrical details of the planetary orbits and distances. 
The truth of the matter, in any event, is that his quantitative 
knowledge of both periods and radii, as spelled out in detail 
later in his book, was so good that the best modern values do 
not, for the most part, differ significantly from the ones he 
quoted. This is shown in Table 8-1, which lists both the Copern- 
ican and the modern data on the classical planets. (Incidentally, 
the values to be extracted from Ptolemy's data are almost iden- 


Orbital radius, AU 

Synodic period, days 

Sidereal period 











87.97 days 

87.97 days 





224.70 days 

224.70 days 





365.26 days 

365.26 days 





1.882 yr 

1.881 yr 





11.87 yr 

11.862 yr 





29.44 yr 

29.457 yr 

tical with those of Copernicus, an astonishing tribute to those 
astronomers whose measurements, from about 750 b.c. up to 
the time of Ptolemy's own observations around 130 a.d., pro- 
vided the basis of his analysis.) 


The data of Table 8-1 point clearly to a systematic relationship 
between the planetary periods and distances. This is displayed 

252 Universal gravitation 

Fig. 8-5 Smooth 
curue relating the 
periods and the orbital 
radii of the planets. 

graphically in Fig. 8-5. The precise form of the relationship was 
first discovered by Johann Kepler in 1618 and published by him 
the following year in his book The Harmonies of the World. 
In it he triumphantly wrote: "I first believed I was dreaming . . . 
But it is absolutely certain and exact that the ratio which exists 
between the periodic times of any two planets is precisely the 
ratio of the ^th powers of the mean distances . . . ." Table 8-2 



Radius r of 

orbit of planet, 


Period T, r s /T 2 , 

days (AU)' i /(dayy 2 X 10" 

























shows the data used by Kepler and a test of the near constaney 
of the ratio r 3 /T 2 . Figure 8-6 is a different presentation of the 
planetary data (actually in this case the data of Copernicus from 
Table 8-1) plotted in modern fashion on log-log graph paper so 
as to show this relationship: 

T~ r 3 ' 2 (8-3) 

This is known as Kepler's third law, having been preceded, 10 
years earlier, by the statement of his two great discoveries (quoted 

253 Kepler's third law 


Fig. 8-6 Log-log 
plot of planetary 
period T versus orbit 
radius r, using data 
guoted by Copernicus. 
The graph shows that 
T is proporlional to 
r 3 '" (Kepler's third 

in the Prologue) concerning the elliptical paths of the individual 

The dynamical expIanation of Kepler's third law had to 
await Newton's discussion of such problems in the Principia. 
A very simple analysis of it is possible if we again use the sim- 
plified picture of the planetary orbits as circles with the sun at 
the center. It then becomes apparent that Eq. (8-3) implies that 
an inverse-square law of force is at work. For in a circular orbit 
of radius r we have 

Expressing v in terms of the known quantities, r and T, we have 

v = 


254 Universal gravitation 

4 Z 
a r = ==- (toward the center) (8-4) 

From Newton's law, then, we infer that the force on a mass in a 
circular orbit must be given by 

F r =ma r =- *&£ (8-5) 

From Kepler's third law, however, we have the relation 

Y 2 = K (8-6) 

where K might be called Kepler's constant — the same value of it 
applies to all the planets traveling around the sun. From Eq. (8-6) 
we thus have l/T 2 = K/r z , and substituting this in Eq. (8-5) 
gives us 

Fr = - ^ (8-7) 

The implication of Kepler's third law, therefore, when 
analyzed in terms of Newton's dynamics, is that the force on a 
planet is proportional to its inertial mass m and inversely pro- 
portional to the square of its distance from the sun. Newton's 
contemporaries Halley, Hooke, and Huygens all appear to have 
arrived at some kind of formulation of an inverse-square law in 
the planetary problem, although Newton's, in terms of his 
deflnite concept of forces acting on masses, seems to have been 
the most clear-cut. The general idea of an influence falling off 
as l/r 2 was probably not a great novelty, for it is the most 
natural-seeming of all conceivable effects — something spreading 
out and having to cover spheres of larger and larger area, in 
proportion to r 2 , so that the intensity (as with light from a source) 
gets weaker according to an inverse-square relationship. 

The proportionality of the force to the attracted mass, as 
required by Eq. (8-7), was a feature of which only Newton 
appreciated the full significance. With his grasp of the concept 
of intcractions exerted mutually between pairs of objects, Newton 
saw that the reciprocity in the gravitational interaction must 
mean that the force is proportional to the mass of the attracting 
object just as it is to the mass of the attracted. Each object is 
the attracting agent as far as the other one is concerned. Hence 
the magnitudo of the force exerted on either one of a mutually 

255 Kepler's third law 

gravitating pair of particles must be expressed in the famous 
mathematical statement of universal gravitation : 

F _ _ Gmxm2 (8 _ g) 

where G is a constant to be found by experiment, and m, and m 2 
are the inertial masses of the particles. We shall return to the 
matter of determining G in practice, but first we shall discuss 
the famous problem that led Newton toward some of his greatest 
discoveries concerning gravitation. 


It is an old story, but still an enthralling one, of how Newton, 
as a young man of 23, came to think about the motion of the 
moon in a way that nobody had ever done before. The path of 
the moon through space, as referred to the "fixed" stars, is a 
line of varying curvature (always, however, bcnding toward the 
sun), which crosses and recrosses the earth's orbit. But of course 
there is a much more striking way of looking at it — the familiar 
earth-centered view, which shows the moon describing an ap- 
proximatcly circular orbit around the earth. To this extent it is 
quitc like the planetary-orbit problem that we have just been 
discussing. But Newton, with his extraordinary insight, con- 
structed an intellectual bridge between this motion and the 
behavior of falling objects— the latter being such a commonplace 
phenomenon that it needed a genius to rccognize its relevance. 
He saw the moon as being just an object falling toward the earth 
like any other— as, for example, an apple dropping off a tree in 
his garden. A very special case, to be sure, because the moon was 
so much farther away than any other falling object in our ex- 
perience. But perhaps i t was all part of the same pattern. 

As Newton himself described it, ' he began in 1665 or 1666 
to think of the earth's gravity as extending out to the moon's 
orbit, with an inverse-square relationship already suggested by 
Kepler's third law. We could of course just restate the cen- 
tripetal acceleration formula and apply it to the moon, but it is 
illuminating to trace the course of Newton's own way of dis- 
cussing the problem. In effect hc said this: Imagine the moon 
at any point A in its orbit (Fig. 8-7). If freed of all forces, it 

'See the Prologue of this book. 

256 Universal gravitation 

Fig. 8-7 Geometry ofa small 
portion ofa circular orbit, show- 
ing the deviation y from the 
tangential straiglu-line displace- 
ment AB ( = x) lltat would be 
followed in the absence of gracity. 

would travel along a straight line AB, tangent to the orbit at A. 
Instead, it follows the arc AP. If O is the center of the earth, 
the moon has in effect "fallen" the distance BP toward O, even 
though its radial distance r is unehanged. Let us caleulate how 
far the moon falls, in this sense, in 1 sec, and compare it with 
the distance of about 16 ft that an object projected horizontally 
near the earth's surface would fail in that same time. 

First, a bit of analytic geometry. If we denote the distance 
AB as x, and the distance BP as y, it will be an exceedingly good 
approximation to put 

y ~2r 


One way of obtaining this result is to consider the right triangle 
ONP, in which we have 

ON = r - y NP = x OP = r 

Hence, by Pythagoras' theorem, 

(r - y) 2 + x 2 = r 2 

x 2 = 2ry - y 2 

Since y « r for any small value of the angle d, Eq. (8-9) follows 
as a good approximation. Furthermore, since (again for small d) 
the arc length AP (= s) is almost equal to the distance A B, we 
can equally well put 

257 The moon and the apple 

y « *- (8-10) 

In order to put numbers into this formula we need to know 
both the radius and the period of the moon's orbital motion. 
The distance to the moon, as known to Newton, depended on the 
two-step process devised by the ancient astronomers— finding 
the earth's radius and finding the moon's distance as a multiple 
of the earth's radius. A rcminder of these classic measurements 
is given in Figs. 8-8 and 8-9 and the accompanying discussion 
(pp. 259-261). The final result, familiar to everyone, is that the 
moon's orbit radius r is about 240,000 miles ~ 3.8 X 10 8 m. 
Its period T is 27.3 days « 2.4 X 10 fi sec. Therefore, in 1 sec it 
travels a distance along its orbit given by 

r , s 2ttX 3.8 X 1 0* _ |WM 

(m 1 sec) s = 2A x 1Q| - - « 1000 m 

During this same time it falls a vertical distance, which we will 
denote y>i to identify it, given [via Eq. (8-10)] by 

(ini sec) >-i«7: 6 -^lo« =1 - 3X,0 ~ 3m 

In other words, in 1 sec, while traveling "horizontally" through 
a distance of 1 km, the moon falls vertically through just over 
1 mm, or about 5 V in.; its deviation from a straight-line path is 
indeed slight. On the other hand, for an object near the earth's 
surface, projected horizontally, the vertical displacement in 
1 sec is given by 

y2 = yr- = 4.9 m 

'i - « x 'O"'' - m 

Newton knew that the radius of the moon's orbit was about 
60 times the radius of the earth itself, as the ancient Greeks 
had first shown. And with an inverse-square law, if it applied 
equally well at all radial distances from the earth's center, we 
would expect yjy* to be about 1/3600. It must bc right! 
And yet, what an astounding result. Even granted an inverse- 
square law of attraction between objccts separated by many 
times their diamctcrs, one still has the task of proving that an 

258 Universal gravitation 

object a few feet above the earth's surface is attracted as though 
the whole mass of the earth were concentrated at a point 4000 
miles below the ground. Newton did not prove this result until 
1685, nearly 20 years after his first great insight into the problem. 
He published nothing, either, until it all came out, perfect and 
complete, in the Principia in 1687. One way of solving the problem 
follows on p. 262 (after the special section below). 

The earth's radius 

About 225 B. c. Eratosthenes, who lived and worked at Alexandria 
near the mouth of the Nile, reported on measurements made on 
the shadows cast by the sun at noon on midsummer day. At 
Alexandria (marked A in Fig. 8-8) the sun's rays made an angle 
of 7.2° to the local vertical, whereas corresponding measurements 
made 500 miles farther south at Syene (now the site of the 
Aswan Dam) showed the sun to be exactly overhead at noon. 
(In other words, Syene lay almost exactly on the Tropic of 
Cancer.) It follows at once from these figures that the arc AS, 
of length 500 miles, subtends an angle of 7.2° or g rad at the 
center of the earth. Hcnce 

500 _ 1 
Re ~ 8 


Re ~ 4000 miles 

Fig. 8-8 Basis of the 
method useci by 
Eratosthenes to find 
the earth's radius. 
When the midday sun 
was exactly overhead 
at Syene (S) its rays 
fell at 7.2° to the verti- 
cal at Alexandria (A). 

259 Finding the distance lo the moon 

The moon's distance measured in earth radii 

Hipparchus, a Grcek astronomer who lived mostly on the island 
of Rhodes, made observations in about 130 B.c. from which he 
obtained a remarkably accurate estimate of the moon's distance. 
His method was one suggested by another great astronomer, 
Aristarchus, about 150 years earlier. 

The method involves a clear understanding of the positional 
relationships of sun, earth, and moon. We know that sun and 
moon subtend almost exactly the same angle a. at the earth. 
Hipparchus measured this angle to be 0.553° (« 1/103.5 rad); he 
also knew what Aristarchus before him had found — that the 
sun is far more distant than the moon. Hipparchus used this 
knowledge in an analysis of an eclipse of the moon by the earth 
(Fig. 8-9). The shaded region indicates the area that is in com- 
plete shadow; its boundary lines PA and QB make an angle a 
with one another, because this is the angle between rays coming 
from the extreme edges of the sun. The moon passes through the 
shadowed region, and from the measured time that this passage 
took, Hipparchus deduced that the angle subtended at the earth 
by the arc BA was 2.5 times that subtended by the moon itself. 
Thus Z AOB « 2.5a. 

Let us now do some geometry. If the distance from the 
earth's center to the moon is D, the length of the arc BA is very 
nearly equal to the earth's diameter PQ diminished by the 
amount aD: 

AB « 2R B - aD 

Fig. 8-9 Basis of the method used by Hipparchus tofind 
the moon's distance. The method depended on obseroing 
the duration {and hence the augular widtli) of the moon's 
total eclipse in the shadow of the earth, as represented by 
the arc AB. 

260 Universal gravitation 

But we also have 

AB _ 
D ~ 



AB « 


Substituting this in the first 





i» 2R F , 


D _ 


Since a «s 

1/103.5 rad, 



Z) _ 


Combining this with the value of .Re itself, we have 
D » 236,000 miles 

Modern methods 

Refined triangulation techniques give a mean value of 3,422.6", 
or 0.951°, for the angle subtended at the moon by the earth's 
radius. Using the modern value of the earth's radius 

(Re = 6378 km = 3986 miles) 

one obtains almost exactly 240,000 miles for the moon's mean 
distance. Such traditional methods, however, are far surpassed 
by the technique of making a precision measurement of the time 
for a radar echo or laser reflection to return to earth. The fiight 
time of such signals (only about 2.5 sec for the roundtrip) can 
be measured to a fraction of a microsecond, giving range deter- 
minations that are not only of unprecedcntcd accuracy but are 
also effectively instantaneous. 


It has long been suggested that Newton's failure to publicize 
his discovery about an invcrse-square law of the earth's gravity 

261 The gravitational attraction of a large sphere 

extcnding to the moon was due primarily tO an actual numerical 
discrepancy, resulting from his use of an erroneous value for the 
earth's radius. This would, via Eq. (8-10), falsify the value of 
the moon's distance of fail, since /• (the radius of the moon's 
orbit) was calculated, according to the method discovered by 
Hipparchus, in tcrms of the earth's radius. When Newton first 
did the calculation he was home in the countryside, out of reach 
of reference books, and it is reliably recorded that he calculated 
the earth's radius by assuming that 1° of latitude is 60 miles, 
instead of the correct figurc of nearly 70 miles. Be this as it may, 
it remains almost certain that Newton, with his outstandingly 
thorough and critical approach to problems, would never have 
regarded the theory as complete until he had solved the problem 
of gravitation by large objects. Let us now consider a way of 
analyzing this problem. (In Chapter 1 1 we shall tackle it again 
in a more sophisticated way.) 

Suppose we have a large solid sphere, of radius R , as shown 
in Fig. 8-10(a), and wish to calculate the force with which it at- 
tracts a small object of mass m at an arbitrary point P. We shall 
assume that the density of the material of the sphere may vary 
with distance from the ccnter (as is the case for the earth, to a 
very marked degree) but that the density is the same at all points 
equidistant from the center. We can then consider the solid 
sphere to be built up of a very large number of thin uniform 

Fig. 8-10 (a) A solid sphere can be regarded as built 
up ofa set ofthin concentric splierieal shells. (b) The 
gravitational effect of an individual shell can befound 
by treating it as an assembtage ofeireular zones. 

262 Universal gravitation 

spherical shells, like thc successive layers of an onion. The total 
gravitational effect of the sphere can be calculated as the super- 
position of the effects of all these individual shells. Thus the 
basic problem becomes that of calculating the force exerted by a 
thin spherical shell of arbitrary radius, assuming that the funda- 
mental law of force is that of the inverse square between point 

In Fig. 8-10(b) we show a shell of mass M, radius R, of 
negligible thickness, with a particle of mass m at a distance r 
from the center of the shell. If we consider a small piece of the 
shell, near point A, the force that it exerts on m is along the line 
AP. It is clear from the symmetry of the system, howcver, that 
the resultant force due to the whole shell must be along the line 
OP; any component of force transverse to OP due to material 
near A will be canceled by an equal and opposite contribution 
from material near A'. Thus if we have an element of mass dM 
near A, we need only consider its contribution to the force along 
OP, i. e., the radial direction from the center of the shell to m. 
Hence we have 


s 2 

Let us now consider a complete belt or zone of the shell, shown 
shaded in the diagram. It represents the portion of the shell that 
is contained between the directions and 6 + dd to the axis OP, 
and the same mean values of s and <p apply to every part of it. 
Thus, if we calculate its mass, we can substitute this value as 
dM in Eq. (8-11) to obtain the contribution of the whole belt to 
the resultant gravitational force along OP. Now the width of 
the belt is R dd and its circumference is 2irR sin 9; thus its area 
is 2irR 2 sin 6 dd. The area of the whole shell is 4irR 2 ; hence the 
mass of the belt is given by 

_. 2TrR 2 sm6d6 .. M . Q „ 
dM = — — M = — sin d6 

Thus Eq. (8-11) gives us 

GMm co s f sin 9 dd .. ,. 

OFr = j Ti (o-lZ) 

Our task now is to sum the contributions such as dF r over the 
263 The gravitational attraction of a largc sphere 

whole of the shell, i.e., over thc whole range of values of .?, <p, 
and e. This looks like a formidable task, but with the help of a 
little calculus (another of Newton's inventions!) the solution 
turns out to be surprisingly straightforward. 

From the geometry of the situation [Fig. 8-10(b)], it is 
possible to exprcss both of the angles and <p in terms of two 
fixed distances, r and R, and the variable distance s. By two 
separate applications of the cosine rule we have 

,»+ *»- l r 2 + s 2 - R 2 

cose = - -uar "* v =~ ~^T 

From the first of these, by differentiation, we have 

• „ , n sds 

sin 6 dd = — -- 


Hence, substituting the values of cos <p and sin 6 dd in Eq. (8-12), 
we obtain 

GMm (r 2 + s 2 - R 2 )ds 
dFr = " ~4^R ^ 

The total force is found by integrating this expression from the 
minimum value of s (= r — R) to its maximum value (r + R). 
Thus we have 

"--^ir d± 4^- 

'f - 

The integral is just the sum of two elementary forms; we have 

r 2 -R 2 

Inserting the limits, we then find that 


r+B 2 J. 2 _ » 2 

f "*"% — ds m [(r + R)- (r - R)] 

T-R S* 

_ ( r 2 - R 2 _ r 2 - R 2 \ 
\r+ R " r- R J 
= 2R - (r- R) + (r + R) 
= 4R 

264 Universal gravitation 

Substituting this value of the definite integral in Eq. (8-13) we 

F r = - ^ (8-14) 

What a wonderful result! It is of extraordinary simplicity, and 
the radius R of the shell does not appear at all. It is uniquely a 
consequence of an inverse-square law of force between particles; 
no other force law would yield such a simple result for the net 
effect of an extended spherical object. 

Once we have Eq. (8-14), the total effect of a solid sphere 
follows at once. Regardless of the particular way in which the 
density varies between the center and the surface (provided that 
it depends only on R) the complete sphere does indeed act as 
though its total mass were concentrated at its center. It does 
not matter how close the attracted particle P is to the surface 
of the sphere, as long as it is in fact outside. Take a moment to 
consider what a truly remarkable result this is. Ask yourself: Is 
it obvious that an object a few feet above the apparently fiat 
ground should be attracted as though the whole mass of the 
earth (all 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 tons of it!) were con- 
centrated at a point (the earth's center) 4000 miles down? It is 
about as far from obvious as could be, and there can be little 
doubt that Newton had to convince himself of this result before 
hc could establish, to his own satisfaction, the grand connection 
between terrestrial gravity and the motion of the moon and 
other celestial objects. 


Newton's thinking quite explicitly embraced the possibility — at 
least theoretically — of having other satellites of the earth. Figure 
8—1 1 is an illustration from Newton's book, The System of the 
World (which is incorporated in the Principia); it shows the 
transition from the effectively parabolic trajectories of short- 
range projectiles (although the apparent parabolas are really 
small parts of ellipses) to a perfectly cireular orbit and then to 
other elliptic orbits of arbitrary dimensions. 

Let us derive the formulas for the required velocity v and 
the period T of a satellite launehed horizontally in a cireular 
orbit at a distance r from the center of the earth. The necessary 

265 Other satellites of the earth 

Fig. 8-11 Newlon's 
diagram showing the 
transit ion front normal 
parabolic trajectories 
to complete orbits 
encircling the earth. 
(From The System of 
the World.) 

force to maintain circular motion is provided by gravitational 



= G 


where Mg is the mass of the earth, m the mass of the satellite, 
and G the universal gravitational constant. Solving for v, 



It is often convenient to express this result in terms of more 
familiar quantities. We can do this by noticing that, for an 
object of mass m at the earth 's surface, the gravitational force 
on it, by Eq. (8-8), is 

F. - 

Re 2 

But this is the force that can be set equal to mg for the mass in 
question. Hence we have 

mg = 


Rs 2 


GM E = gR E 
Substituting this in Eq. (8-15), we get 

266 Universal gravitation 

v 1/2 


The period, T, of the satellite is then given by 

2xr _ 2^ /2 
v g ll2 R E 


Putting g = 9.8 m/sec 2 , /?g = 6.4 X 10° m, we have a nu- 
merical formula for the period of any satellite in a circular orbit 
of radius r around the earth: 

(Earth satellites) T w 3.14 X 10~ 7 r 3/2 


where T is in seconds and r in meters. 

For example, a satellite at minimum practicable altitude 
(about 200 km, say), has r « 6.6 X 10° m, and hence 

T « 5.3 X 10 ;i sec w 90 min 

The first man-made satellite, Sputnik I (October 1957) had 
an orbit as shown in Fig. 8-1 2(a). Its maximum and minimum 
distances from the earth's surface were initially 228 and 947 km, 
respectively, giving a mean value of r equal to about 6950 km. 

Fig. 8-12 (a) Orbit of Sputnik I, the first man-made 
satellite (October 1957). (A) Synchronous satellite com- 
munication System. Orbital diameter in relation to 
earth's diameter is approximately to scale. 

267 Othcr satellites of the earth 

With this value of r, Eq. (8-17) gives an orbital period of about 
96 min, which agrees closely with the observed figure. 

Particular interest attaches to synchronous satellites that 
have an orbital period equal to the period of the earth's rotation 
on its axis. If placed in orbit in the earth's equatorial plane, such 
satellites will remain above the same spot on the earth's surface, 
and a set of three of them, ideally in a regular triangular array 
as shown in Fig. 8-12(b), can provide the basis of a worldwide 
Communications system with no blind spots. Putting T = 1 day 
in Eq. (8-17), one finds r « 42,000 km or 26,000 miles. Thus 
such satellites must be about 22,000 miles above the earth's sur- 
face, i. e., about 5£ earth radii overhead. The first such satellite 
to be successfully launched was Syncom II in July 1963. 

Equation (8-16), on which the above calculations are based, 
has a very noteworthy feature. A satellite traveling in a circular 
orbit of a given radius has a period independent of the mass of 
the satellite. Thus a massive spaceship of many tons will, for 
the same value of r, have precisely the same orbital period as a 
flimsy object such as one of the Echo balloons, with a mass of only 
about 100 kg — or, for that matter, a small piece of interplanetary 
debris with a mass of only a few kilograms. This result is a 
direct consequence of the fact that the gravitational force on 
any object is strictly proportional to its own mass. 


Although the result expressed by Eq. (8-14) was obtained by 
considering a large sphere and a small particle, one can quickly 
convince oneself that it is also the correct statement of the force 
between any two spherical objects whose centers are a distance 
r apart. For suppose that we have two such spheres, as shown 
in Fig. 8-1 3(a). The calculation that we have carried out shows 
that one sphere (say the one on the left) attracts every particle 
of the other as if the left-hand mass were a point [Fig. 8-1 3(b)]. 
This therefore reduces the problem to the mutual gravitational 
attraction between a sphere (the right-hand sphere, of mass m) 
and a point particle of mass M. But now we can apply the result 
of the Iast section a second time. Thus we arrive at Fig. 8-1 3(c), 
with two point masses separated by a distance r, as a rigorously 
correct basis for calculating the force of attraction between the 
two extended masses shown in Fig. 8-1 3(a). 

The above result is important in the analysis of the experi- 
ment, already described in Chapter 5, for finding the universal 

268 Universal gravitation 

Fig. 8-13 (a) Two gracilaiing spheres at small separa- 

lion. (b) Effect ofone spliere (M) can be calculated by 

treating it as a poinl mass. (c) The argumen! can be 

repeated, so thal the attraction between the spheres can 

be calculated as lhougli bolh were poinl masses. 

gravitation constant. G, from the measured force between two 
spheres of known masses. In order to get the biggest possible 
effect with an interaction that is so extremely weak, it is usual 
to arrange things so that the centers of the spheres are separated 
by only a little more than the sum of the radii. It is then a great 
convenience to be able to calculate the force, even under these 
conditions, on the basis of Eq. (8-14). Notice, however, that 
the result holds only for spheres. Some of the measurements to 
determine G have made use of cylindrical masses, because of the 
greater ease of machining them to high precision. In such cases 
it becomes necessary to calculate the net force by an explicit 
integration over the spatial distribution of material. 

The prescntly accepted value of G, as obtained from labora- 
tory measurements of the force exerted between two known 
masses, is (as already quoted in Chapter 5): 

G = 6.670 X 10-" m : 7kg-sec 2 (8-18) 

Newton himself did not know the value of G, although he made 
a celebrated guess a t the mean density of the earth, from which 
he could have obtained a conjectural figure. In Book III of the 
Principia, he remarks at one point as follows : "Since ... the 
common matter of our earth on the surface thereof is about 
twice as heavy as water, and a little lower, in mines, is found 
about three, or four, or even five times heavier, it is probable 
that the quantity of the whole matter of the earth may be five 
or six times greater than if it consisted all of water . . . ." 

If we denote the mean density of the earth as p and its radius 
as R, the gravitational force exerted on a partiele of mass m just 
at the earth's surface is given by 

269 The value of G', and ihc mass of ihc earth 

F = 9Mn (8-19) 

R 2 




F = -- (GpR)m 

Since, however, this is just the force that gives the particle an 
acceleration g in free fail, we also have 

F = mg 

It follows, then, that 

g = ^GpR (8-20) 

If in this cquation we put g « 9.8 m/sec 2 , R ~ 6.37 X 10° m, 
and (using Newton's estimate) p ~ 5000 to 6000 kg/m 3 , we 
find that 

G « (6.7 ± 0.6) X 10-" m :, /kg-sec 2 

Thus Newton's estimate was almost exactly on target. In prac- 
tice, of course, the calculation is done the other way around. 
Given the directly determined value of G [Eq. (8-18)] we sub- 
stitute in Eqs. (8-19) and (8-20) to find the mass and the mean 
density of the earth. The result of these substitutions (with 
R = 6.37 X 10° m) is 

M = 5.97 X 10 24 kg 
p = 5.52 X 10 3 kg/m 3 


If we take the idealization of a perfectly spherical, symmetrical 
earth, then the gravitational force on an object of mass m at a 
distance h above the surface is given by 

F = 

(R + A)2 

270 Universal gravitaiion 

If we identify F with m times the value of g at the point in ques- 
tion, we have 

■» - m (8 - 2,) 

For /i « R, this would imply an almost exactly linear decrease 
of g with height. Using the binomial theorem, we can rewrite 
Eq. (8-21) as follows: 

,,, GM(.,h\— 

m \ * * 2 ~ 7 

Hence, for small h, we have 

gCA)-w(l-f) (8-22) 

where g = GM/R 2 , the value of g at points extremely close to 
the earth's surface. [Alternatively, we can use a calculus method 
that can be extremely useful whenever we want to consider the 
fractional variation of a quantity. It is based on the fact that the 
differentiation of the natural logarithm of a quantity leads at 
once to the fractional variation. In the present case we have 

.. GM 
«W = -^T 


ln g = const. — 2 ln r 


As k _ 2 Ar 
g r 

Hence, putting r = R, g = go, and Ar = h, we have 

Ag ^ - 2go - 

which leads us back to Eq. (8-22). Notice how this method 
frees us of the need to concern ourselves with the values of any 
multiplicative constants that appear in the original equation — 
e.g., the value of GM in the equation for g. A recognition of this 
fact can enable one to avoid a lot of unnecessary arithmetic in 

271 Local variations ofg 

the computation of small changes of one quantity that depends 
upon another according to some well-defined functional re- 

Newton's contcmporary, Robert Hooke, made several 
efforts to detect a variation of the gravitational attraction with 
height. He did this by looking for any changes in the measured 
weights of objects at the tops of church towers and the bottoms 
of deep wells. Not surprisingly, he was unable to find any dif- 
ference. By Eq. (8-22) one would have to ascend to a point 
about 1000 ft above ground (e. g., the top of the Empire State 
Building) before the decrease of g was even as great as I part in 
10,000. As we shall see in a moment, however, such variations 
are detected with the greatest of ease by modern techniques. 

Superimposed on the systematic variations of the gravita- 
tional force with height are the variations produced by in- 
homogeneities in the material of the earth's crust. For example, 
if one is standing above a subterranean deposit of salt or sand, 
much lower in density than ordinary rocks, one would expect the 
value of g to be reduced. Such changes, although extremely 
small, can be measured with remarkable accuracy by modern 
instruments and have become a very valuable tool in geophysical 

Almost all modern gravity meters are static instruments, in 
which a mass is in equilibrium under the combined action of 
gravity and an elastic restoring force supplied by a spring. In 
other words, it is just a very sensitive spring balance. A change 
in g as the instrument is moved from one point to another leads 
to a minute change in the equilibrium position, and this is de- 
tected by sensitive optical methods or electrically by, for ex- 
ample, making the suspended mass part of a tuned circuit whose 
capacitance, and hencc frequency, is changed by the slight 
displaccment. To be useful, such instruments must be capable 
of detecting fractional changes of g of 10 -7 or less. Figure 
8-14(a) shows the basic construetion of one such device. With 
it one can trace out contours of constant g over a region of 
interest. Figure 8-14(b) shows the results of such a survey, after 
allowance has been made for effects due to varying altitude, 
surface features, and so on. Such contours can give good in- 
dications of ore concentrations. The primary unit of mcasure- 
ment in these gravity surveys is known as the gal (after Galileo): 

1 gal = 1 cm/sec 2 « \Q~* g 

272 Universal gra vital ion 


Fig. 8-14 ia) Sketch of basic features ofa sensitiue 
grammeter, made offused quarlz. The arm marked W 
acts as the main weight. U is picoied al A and B and 
carries a pointer P. The restoring force is provided by a 
control spring S\ and a null reading can be oblained 
wilh the help ofthe ca/ibrajed spring 5 2 . (.b) Example 
ofa gravity surcey ouer an area about 400 by 500 m, 
with contours of conslant g indicating an ore deposit. 
(After a survey made by the Boliden Mining Co., 
Sweden, and reproduced in D. S. Parasnis, Mining 
Geophysics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1960.) 

273 Local varialions of g 

This is far too large for convenience, so most surveys, like that 
of Fig. 8-14(b), show contours labeled in terms of milligals 
(1 mgal = 10 -3 cmsec 2 « 10~"g). Under the best conditions, 
relativc mcasurements accurate to 0.01 mgal may be achievable. 
One can appreciate how impressive this is by noting that a 
change of g by 0.01 mgal (1 part in 10 8 ) corresponds to a change 
in elevation of only about 3 cm at the earth's surface! 


Let us return to the simple picture of the solar system in which 
each planet deseribes a cireular orbit about a fixed central sun 
(Fig. 8-15). We have seen, in the diseussion of Kepler's third 
law, how the use of Newton's Iaw of motion implies that the 
foree on the planet is given, in terms of its mass, orbital radius, 
and period, by the following equation [Eq. (8-5)]: 

F r = - 

. 2 
4tt mr 


According to the basic law of the foree, however, as exprcssed 
by Newton's law of universal gravitation [Eq. (8-8)], the value 
of F r is given by the equation 

F r = - 


where M is the mass of the sun. From the equality of these two 
expressions, we obtain the following result: 




We may again note the feature, already commented on in con- 

Fig. 8-15 Planelary orbit approxi- 
maled by a cirele wiih the sun at the 

274 l Iniversal gravitation 

nection with earth satellites, that the period is independent of the 
mass of the orbiting object, in this case the earth itself or some 
other planet. What does matter is the mass of the sun, and if we 
turn Eq. (8-23) around, we have an equation that tells us the 
value of this mass, M, in terms of observable quantities: 

*-££ <H4> 

Kepler's third law expresses the fact that the value of r 3 /T 2 is 
indeed the same for a U the planets. The statement of this result 
does not, however, rcquire the use of absolute values of r — or, 
for that matter, of T either. It is sufficient to know the values 
of r and T for the various planets as multiples or fractions of the 
earth's orbital radius and period. In order to deduce the mass 
of the sun from Eq. (8-24), however, the use of absolute values is 
essential. We have seen, earlier in this chapter, how the length 
of the earth's year has been known with great accuracy since the 
days of antiquity. A knowledge of the distance from the earth 
to the sun is, however, rather recent. The development of this 
knowledge makes an interesting story, which is summarized in 
the special seetion following. The final result, expressed as a 
mean distance in meters, can be substituted as the value of r in 
Eq. (8-24), along with the other necessary quantities as folio ws: 

r*** 1.50 XlO H m 
T K ~ 3.17 X 10 7 sec 
G = 6.67 X 10-" m 3 /kg-sec 2 

We then find that 

M„ m «■ 2.0 X 10 30 kg 


The first attempt to estimate the distance of the sun was made 
by the great Greek astronomer, Aristarchus, in the third century 
B.c, and he arrived at a result which, although quite erroneous, 
held the field for many centuries. His method, sound in principle 
but made ineffectual by the great remoteness of the sun, is in- 
dicated in Fig. 8-16(a). He knew that one half of the moon was 
illuminated by the sun and that the phases of the moon were 
the result of viewing this illuminated hemisphere from the earth. 

275 Findina the distance to ihc sun 



Fig. 8-16 (a) Melhod allempied by Arislarchus to find 
Ihe sun's dislance by measuring ihe angle SEM at half- 
moon. (b) Triangutation melhod of cslablishing the 
scale of ihe solar sysiem by finding ihe dislance o/ 
Mars, iising Ihe earth' s radius as a base line. (c) Direel 
delerminalion of ihe sun's dislance by obserc'mg Ihe 
transit of Venus front differenl poinls on Ihe earth. 

When the moon is exactly half full, the angle SME is 90°. If, in 
this situation, an exact measurement can bc made of the angle d, 
the difference in directions of the sun and moon as seen from a 
point on the earth, we can deduce the angle a (= 90° - 6) 
subtcnded at the sun by the earth-moon distance r m- Aristarchus 
judged to be about 87°, which gives a ~ 3° ~ 55 rad and 
hcnce /\s « 20/\u. Since, however, the measured angle is 9 and 
not a, the error in the final result may be (and is) very great. 
Our present knowledge tells us that the value of in the situation 
represented by Fig. 8-16(a) is actually about 89.8° instead of 
87°; this relatively small change in 6 raises the ratio r s /r M to 
several hundred instead of 20. 

A complctcly different attack on the problem was initiated 
by Kcpler, although its full exploitation was not possible until 
much later. Even so it at once becamc clear that the sun is 
more distant than Aristachus had concluded. The basis of the 
method is indicated in Fig. 8-16(b). It involves observations on 

276 Universal gravitation 

the planet Mars. When Mars is closest to the earth, it lies on a 
line joining both planets to the sun. Under these conditions the 
distance between them is the difference between their orbital 
radii. Now if Mars is viewed from two different points on the 
earth, it should appear in slightly different directions with respect 
to the vastly more distant background of "fixed" stars. The 
particular angular difference, S, for observers placed at A and B 
is called the parallax; it is the angle subtended by the earth's 
radius at the position of Mars. To measure this angle one does 
not need to have observers at two different points on the earth; 
the rotation of the earth itself would carry an observer from A. 
to B in about 6 hr during a given night. Now Kepler was able 
to deduce from the very careful observations of his master, 
Tycho Brahe, that the value of S must be less than 3 minutes of 
arc, which is about 1/1200 rad; he could conclude that the 
distance to Mars in this configuration must be greater than 1200 
earth radii or about 5 million miles. Then, using the known 
relatioe values of orbital radii from the Copernican seheme 
(Table 8-1), it follows that the distance of the sun from the earth 
is more than 2400 earth radii, i.e., more than 10 million miles. 

John Flamsteed, a contemporary of Newton to whose 
observations Newton owed a great deal (he was Astronomer 
Royal from 1675 to 1720), reduced the upper limit on the parallax 
of Mars to about 25 seconds of arc, and concluded that the sun's 
distance was at least 80 million miles. An Italian astronomer, 
Cassini, arrived at a specific value of about 87 million miles at 
about the same time, using observations made by himself in 
Europe and by a French astronomer, Richer, at Cayenne in 
South America. Another contemporary of Newton's — Edmund 
Halley 1 — proposed a method that finally led, 100 years later, to 
the first precision measurements of the sun's distance. The method 
involved what is known as a transit of Venus, i.e., a passage of 
Venus aeross the sun's disk, as seen from the earth. Figure 
8-16(c) illustrates the basis of the method. As it passes aeross 
the sun, Venus looks like a small black dot. Its apparent path, 
and also the times at which the transit begins or ends, depend on 
the position of the observer on earth. Since the motion of Venus 

■Edmund Halley, best known for the comet named after him, succeeded 
Flamsteed in 1720 as Astronomer Royal. Long before this, however, he had 
been very active in physics and astronomy. He became a devoted friend and 
admirer of Newton, and it was largely through his help and persuasion that 
the Principia was published, 

277 Finding the distance to the sun 

is accurately known, the timing of the transit can be used to 
yield accurate measures of the differences in angular positions 
of Venus as seen by observers at different positions. From such 
observations the parallax of Venus can be inferred, after which 
one can use an analysis just like that for Mars. These transits 
arc fairly rare, because the orbits of the earth and Venus are not 
in the same plane, but Halley pointed out that a pair of them 
would occur in 1761 and 1769, and again in 1874 and 1882, and 
then in 2004 and 2012. From the first two of these (both occurring 
long after Halley 's own death) the solar parallax was found to be 
dcfinitely between about 8.5 and 9.0 seconds of arc, correspond- 
ing to a distance of between about 92 and 97 million miles. Thus 
the currently accepted result was approached. (The best mea- 
surements of this type have been made on the asteroid Eros at 
its elosest approach to the earth.) 

Further refinements came with the observations made in 
the late nineteenth century. One of the most notable of these 
was the use of an accurately known value of the speed of light 
to deduce the diameter of the earth's orbit from the accumulated 
time lag, over a period of 6 months, in the observed eclipses 
of the moons of Jupiter. The situation is indicated in Fig. 8-17. 
While the earth moves from E x to E 2 , Jupiter moves only from 
J, to J \. This introduces an extra transit time of about 16 min 
for the light that tells us that one of Jupiter's moons has, for 
example, just appeared from behind the planet. Knowing that 
the speed of light is 186,000 miles/sec in empty space, we can 
deduce that the earth's orbital radius is equal to this speed times 
about 480 sec, or about 90 million miles. (The caleulation was 
originally donc just the other way around, by the Danish astron- 
omer Roemer in 1675. Using an approximate value of the 
distance from earth to sun, he made the first quantitative estimate 
of the speed of light.) 

Fig. 8-17 Measure- 
ment of the diameter 
of the earth's orbit by 
observing the eclipses 
of Jupiter's moons 
and the apparent 
delays due to the 
travel time of light 
through space. 

278 Universal gravitation 

Although the modern measurements of the sun's distance 
are of great accuraey, we must still reckon with the fact that 
this distance varies diiring the course of a year. If we ignore this 
relatively small variation, however, we can make use of the 
average value, already quoted near the beginning of this chapter: 

r E = 1 AU = 1.496 X 10 n m 


Perhaps the most profound contribution that Newton made to 
science was the fundamental connection that he recognized be- 
tween the inertial mass of an object and the earth's gravitational 
force on it — a force roughly equal to the measured weight of the 
object. (Remember, we have defined weight as the magnitude 
of the force, as measured for example on a spring balance, that 
holds the object at rest relative to the earth's surface.) 

It had been known since Galileo's time that all objects near 
the earth fail with about the same acceleration, g. Until Newton 
it was just a kinematic fact. But in terms of Newton's law it 
took on a much deeper significance. If an object is observed to 
have this acceleration, there must be a force F„ acting on it given 
by F = ma, i.e., 

F, = mg (8-25) 

It then becomes a vitally significant dynamical fact that, since 
the acceleration g is the same for all objects, the force F, causing 
it is strictly proportional to the inertial mass. To appreciate how 
remarkable this result is, imagine starting from serateh to in- 
vestigate the force of attraction between two objects in a purely 
static experiment. One measures the force by balancing it with 
a springlike device — a torsion fiber. One finds a quantity, which 
might be called (by analogy with electrical interaetions) a gravita- 
tional charge, q g . This "charge" is charaeteristie of any object 
and has, as far as these experiments are concerned, nothing at all 
to do with the inertial mass, which is defined solely in terms of 
acceleration (under the aetion of forees produced, for example, by 
stretehed springs). One cxperiments with objects of all sorts of 
materials, in different states of aggregation, and so on. It then 
turns out that, in each and every instance, the gravitational 
charge is strictly proportional to an independently established 
quantity, the inertial mass. Is this just a remarkable coincidence, 

279 Mass and weieht 

or does it point to something very fundamental? For a long time 
this apparent coincidence was regarded as one of the unexplained 
mysteries of nature. It took the sagacity of an Einstein to suspect 
that gravitation may, in a sense, be equioalenI to acceleration. 
Einstcin's "postulate of equivalence," that the gravitational 
charge q and the inertial mass m are measures of the same 
quantity, provided the basis of his own theory of gravitation as 
embodied in the general theory of relativity. We shall come back 
to this in Chapter 12, when we discuss noninertial frames of 

We are quite accustomcd to exploiting the proportionality 
of F„ to m in our use of the equal-arm balance [Fig. 8-1 8(a)]. 
What we are doing is balancing the torques of two forces, but 
what we are actually interested in is the equality of the amounts 
of material. We make use of the fact that, to very high accuracy, 
the valuc of g is the same at the positions of both masses, and 
we do not need to bother about what its particular value is. 
Thanks to the proportionality of gravitational force to mass, we 
could, with an equal-arm balance and a set of Standard weights, 
measure out a requircd quantity of any substance equally well 
on the earth, the moon, or Mars. The spring balance [Fig. 
8-1 8(b)], on the other hand, has a calibration that depends 
directly on a particular value of g. Its readings are in effect 
readings of force, even though we use them as a basis for mea- 
suring out required amounts of mass. We might find it con- 
venient to use a spring balance for this purpose on the moon, 
but if its scale were marked in kilograms, we should have to 
mask this out and attach a fresh calibration with the help of 
Standard masses. 

Fig. 8-18 (a) Weigh- 
ing with an egual-arm 
balance — in effect a 
direct comparison of 
masses, valid whatever 
the value of g. 
(b) Weighing with a 
spring balance — a 
measurement of the 
gravitational force, 
directly dependent on 
the value of g. 

280 Universal gravitation 

Fig. 8-19 Forces acling on the bob ofa simple 

Newton himself recognized that the strict proportionality 
of the gravitational force to the inertial mass, as evidenced by the 
identical local acceleration of falling objects, was a key feature 
in his own statement of universal gravitation as expressed in 
Eq. (8-8). He therefore made a series of very careful pendulum 
experiments to test whether a pendulum of a given length, but 
with a variety of objects used as the bob, always had the same 
period. To see how this works, consider an object of inertial 
mass m hung on a string (Fig. 8-19). The two forces on it (ignor- 
ing air resistancc) are the tension T and the gravitational force F„. 
The tension T is at every instant pcrpendicular to the path of the 
pendulum bob and so has no effect on the tangential acceleration 
a$. The tangential acceleration is due to the tangential com- 
ponent of F„. From Fig. 8-19, 

Fe = ma» = —F a smd 

from which 

a« = — (Fg/m)sin 9 


At every angle 6 the acceleration ag depends on the ratio F„/m. 
Therefore — for given initial conditions — the vehcity of the bob 
at every angle 6 will be determined by this ratio. So also the 
period for one completc round trip will depend upon the ratio 
(F s /m). Newton observed the periods of pcndulums with dif- 
ferent bobs but with equal lengths. From his observation that 
the periods of all such pendulums were equal within his experi- 
mental error, Newton concluded that F was proportional to m 
to better than 1 part in 1000. 

More recent experiments (beginning with Baron Eiitvos in 
Budapest in the nineteenth century) have made use of a very 
clever idca that permits a static measurement. It depends on 
recognizing that an object hanging at rest relatioe to the earth i n 
fact has an acceleration toward the earth's axis because, by 
virtue of the earth's rotation, it is traveling in a circular path of 
radius r = R cos \, whcrc X is the latitudc (see Fig. 8-20). This 
means that a net force of magnitude mu 2 r must be acting on it, 
where m is the inertial mass. How is this force provided? The 
answer is that, when a body hangs on a string ncar the earth's 
surface, the string, exerting a force T, is not in quite the same 

281 Mass and weight 

Fig.8-20 Basis of the Eotvos 
methodfor comparing the inerlial 
mass and the gravitational mass of 
mi object that is at rest relatice to 
the earth and hence is being aceeler- 
ated toward the earth' s axis. 

Fig. 8-21 Principle 
oftlte Eoluos lorsion- 
balance measurement : 
(o) Two approximately 
egual masses hang 
from a torsion bar. 
(b) I f the objects do 
not have identical 
ratios of inerlial to 
gracitational mass, the 
lensions in the sus- 
pending strings must 
be in slightly different 
directions. In eguilib- 
rium, the direction of 
the main supporting 
fiber must be interme- 
diate between the 
directions ofTi and 
T 2 . (c) This implies 
the possibility of a net 
torque that twists the 
torsion bar abotit a 
vertical axis. 

direction as the gravitational force F„. And if F„ is not strictly 
proportional to m, the angle between T and F„ will be different 
for different objects. To search for any such variations, a very 
sensitive torsion balance is used, carrying dissimilar objects at 
the two ends of a horizontal bar [Fig. 8-21 (a)]. If the directions 
of the tensions T, and T a are different [Fig. 8-21 (b)], there will 
be small horizontal components [Fig. 8-21(c)] that act in op- 
posite directions with respect to the horizontal bar but that givc 
torques in the same sense. On the other hand, if the directions 
of T! and T 2 are identical, even if their magnitudes are not 
quite the same, there is no net torque tending to twist the torsion 
fiber. To test for the existence of any such torque, Eotvos placed 
the whole apparatus i n a case that could be rotated. The hori- 



T, sin B 



r, sin i* 


282 Universal eravitation 

Fig. 8-22 To see 
whether a net torque 
exisls in the Eotvos 
experiment, the whole 
apparatus is turned 
through 180". This 
would recerse the 
sense ofthe torque. 

zontal beam carrying the two masses was aligned in an east-west 
direction [Fig. 8-22(a)] and a reading was taken of its position 
with respect to the case. The whole system was then rotated 
through 180°, as inFig. 8-22(b). If you analyze both situations 
on the basis of Fig. 8-21, you will find that, with respect to the 
center line of the case, the angle of twist would be reversed by 
this operation; hence, if any net torque existed, its existence 
would be revealed. 

More recently, some elegant modernized experiments of 
this type have been performed by R. H. Dicke and his collab- 
orators. ' By such experiments it has been shown that the strict 
proportionality of F B to m holds to 1 part in 10 10 or better. 

The description of the above experiments points to a closely 
related phenomenon — a systematic variation with latitude of the 
measured weight of an object. If we take the idealization of a 
perfectly spherical earth (Fig. 8-23), the equilibrium of the object 
is maintained by applying a force of magnitude W at an angle a 
to the radius such that the following conditions are satisfied: 

Wsina = moi 2 rsin\ 
F„ — Jfcosa = mui 2 rcos\ 

where r = R cos X. Since a is certainly a very small angle, it is 
justifiable to put cos « « 1 in the second equation, thus giving 
the result 

W « F g - mo> 2 R cos 2 X 
'See R. H. Dicke, Sci. Am., 205, 84 (Dec. 1961). 

283 Mass and weight 

Fig. 8-23 The force needed to 
balance the weiglil of an object is 
different 'm bolh direction and magni- 
tude from t he force of gravity. 

It follows that 

W(\) « Wo + mu 2 R sin 2 X 

where W is the measured weight on the equator. Putting 
iy = mgo, we can also obtain a corresponding expression for 
the latitude dependence of g: 

l?(X) = 80 + <* 2 R sin 2 X 

If in this expression we substitute w = 27r/86,400sec -1 and 
R = 6.4 X 10° m, we find w 2 /? « 3.4 X 10~ 2 m/sec 2 , which 
with g « 9.8 m/sec 2 gives us 

g(\) « 9.8(1 + 0.0035 sin 2 X) m/sec 2 

This formula is more successful than it deserves to be, for we 
have no right to ignore the significant flattening of the earth, 
due again to the rotation, which makes the equatorial radius 
of the earth about 1 part in 300 greater than the polar radius. 
This eliipticity has two consequences: It puts a point on the 
equator farther away from the earth's center than it otherwise 
would bc, but it also in effect adds an extra belt of gravitating 
material around the equatorial region. The resultant value of g 
at sea level, taking these effects into account, is quite well de- 
scribed by the following formula: 

g(\) = 9.7805(1 + 0.00529 sin 2 X) 


Thus our simplc calculation has the correct form, but its value 
for the numerical coefRcient of the latitude-dependent correction 
is only about two thirds of the true figure. 

284 Universal gravitation 


It is appropriate, after thc detailed discussion of the relations 
among mass, gravitational force, and weight, to devote a few 
words to the propcrty that is called weightlessness. The very 
explicit distinction that we have drawn between the gravitational 
force on an object and its measured weight makes use of what is 
called an operational definition of the latter quantity. The weight, 
as we have defined i t, is the magnitude of the force that will 
hold an object at rest relative to the earth. Our definition of 
weightlessness derives very naturally from this: An object is 
weight less whenever i t is in a state of completely free fail. In this 
state each part of the object undergocs the same acceleration, 
of whatcvcr value corresponds to the strcngth of gravity at its 
location. (In saying this we assume that g does not change ap- 
preciably over the linear extent of the object.) An object that 
is prevented from falling, by being restrained or supported, 
inevitably has internal stresses and deformations in its equi- 
librium state. This may become very obvious, as when a drop 
of mercury flattens somewhat when it rests on a horizontal sur- 
face. Ali such stresses and deformations are removed in the 
weightless state of free fail. The mercury drop, for cxample, is 
free to take on a perfectly spherical shape. 

The above definition of weightlessness can be applied in 
any gravitational environment, and this is the way it should be. 
The bizarre dynamical phenomena of life in a space capsule do 
not depend on getting into regions far from the earth, where the 
gravitational forces are much reduced, but simply on the fact that 
the capsule, and everything in it, is falling freely with the same 
acceleration, which in consequence goes undetected. For ex- 
ample, if a spacecraft is in orbit around the earth, 200 km above 
the earth's surface, the gravitational force on the spacecraft, 
and on everything iri it, is still about 95% of what one would 
measure at sea level, but the phenomena associated with what 
we call weightlessness are just as pronounced under these con- 
ditions as they are in another spacecraft 200,000 miles from earth, 
where the earth's gravitational attraction is down to j^Vo of that 
at the earth's surface. In both situations an object released inside 
the spacecraft will remain poised in midair. The same would 
be true in a spacecraft that was simply falling radially toward 
the earth's center rather than pursuing a cireular or elliptical 
orbit around the earth. When viewcd in these terms the phe- 

285 Weightlessness 

nomena of weightlessness are not in the least mysterious, al- 
though they are still startling because they conflict so strongly 
with our normal experience. 


The recognition of the universality of gravitation gives us a 
powerful tool for obtaining Information about planets other 
than the earth, and indeed about celestial objects in general. In 
particular, if a planet has satellites of its own, we can find its 
mass by an analysis exactly similar to the one we used for de- 
ducing the mass of the sun from the motions of the planets 
themselves. This provides the simplest way of finding the mass 
of any planet that has satellites. Such satellites, if a planet has 
more than one of them, also provide a further test of Kepler's 
third law, taking the planet itself as the central gravitating body. 

Newton himself applied an analysis of this kind to Jupiter, 
using data for its four most prominent satellites. These were 
the satellites (or "moons") that made history when Galileo dis- 
covered them with his new astronomical telescope in 1610 (see 
pp. 287-290). Figure 8-24(a) shows their changing positions as 
seen through a modern telescope, and Fig. 8-24(b) reproduces a 
few of the sketches that Galileo himself made, night after night, 
over a period of many months. Figure 8-24(c) is a graph con- 
structed from Galileo's quantitative records, using the readings 
that can be unambiguously associated with the outermost of the 
four satellites. A period of about 16 days can be inferred. Galileo 
had no hesitation in interpreting his observations in terms of the 
four satellites following circular orbits that were seen edgewise — 
giving, as we would describe it, the appearance of simple harmonic 
motion at right angles to our line of sight. On the basis of further 
measurements Galileo arrived at rather accurate values of the 
orbital periods of all four satellites and at moderately good values 
of the orbital radii expressed as multiples of the radius of Jupiter 

Newton, in the Principia, used similar data of greater pre- 
cision, obtained by his contemporary John Flamsteed. Table 8-3 
(p. 290) lists these data, and in Fig. 8-25 they are plotted loga- 
rithmically (cf. Fig. 8-6) in such a way as to show how they give 
another demonstration of the correctness of Kepler's third law. 
The slope is accurately f. 

The use of Jupiter's radius as a unit for measuring the 
orbital radii was not merely a convenience. As we have already 

286 Universal gravitation 

noted in our discussion of the mass of the suri, the absolute scale 
of the solar system was not known with any great certainty in 
Newton's day. It is interesting, however, that using the data as 
presented in Table 8-3, without absolute values of the radii, 
one can deduce the mean density, pj, of Jupiter. By analogy 
with our analysis of earth satellites [p. 266, and in particular 
Eq. (8-15)], we have 

2xr (GMj\ 



M j = — 


Mj = ^ Pj Rj 3 

we get 

i '■> 
_ 3t n 

Substituting n*/T 2 ~ 7.5 X 10 -9 sec -2 , and G - 6.67 X 
10- n m 3 /kg-sec 2 , wefind 

pj m 1050 kg/m 3 

i.e., about the same density as water. 

If a planet does not have satellites of its own, the magnitude 
of its mass may be inferable from a detailed analysis of the tiny 
disturbing effects — called perturbations — that planets exert on 
one another's orbits. This technique has been used for Mercury 
and Venus. The unraveling of these mutual interactions is a 
complicated and difficult matter, however, and in at least one 
case it posed a problem that was not adequately answered for a 
long time. This was the interaction between the two most 
massive planets, Jupiter and Saturn, which caused irregularities 
of a very puzzling kind in the orbits of both. It was even con- 
sidered possible that the basic law of gravitation would need to 
be modified slightly away from a precise inverse-square relation- 
ship. The solution to the mystery was finally achieved, almost a 
century after the publication of the Principia, by the Frcnch 
mathematician Laplace, building on work by his great fellow 

287 Learning about othcr planels 

The moons of Jupiter 

In 1608 Hans Lippershey, in Holland, patented what may hace been the first 
successful lelescope. Galileo learned of this, and soon made lelescopes of his 
own design. His Ihird instrumen!, of more than 30 diamelers' magnification, 
led him lo a dramalic discouery, as recounted by him in his book, The Slarry 

"On the secenth day of January in this prcsenl year 1610, al Ihe first 
hour of Ihe night, when I was ciewing ihe heavenly bodies with a teleseope, 
Jupiter presented itself lo me, and . . . I perceiced that beside Ihe planet 
there were three small starlets, small indeed, bui cery bright. Though I 
belieced them lo be among Ihe hosl offixed stars, they aroused my curiosily 
somewhat by appearing lo lie in an exacl straight line parallel t o the ecliplic 
. . . I paid no attenlion to the distances between them and Jupiter, for at Ihe 
oulsel l thoughl them lo be fixed stars, as l hace said. Bui returning lo the 
same incestigalion on January eighth — ledby what, l do not know — I found 
a uery different arrangemenl. . . ." 

Afew more night s ofobseruation were enough lo concince Galileo what he was 
seeing: "I hadnow [by January 11] decided beyond all question thal there exisled 
in Ihe heavens three stars wandering aboul Jupiter as do Venus and Mercury 
about the sun. . . . Nor were there just three such stars; four wanderers complele 
their revolutions aboul Jupiter. ... Also I measured the distances between them 
by means of the teleseope. . . . Moreocer I recorded the times of the observa- 
tions . ..for the revolutions ofthese planet s are so speedily completed that i t is 
usually possible t o lake eien their hourly varialions." 

Fig. 8~24(a) Jupiter 
and its four mosi 
prominent salellites as 
seen through a modern 
teleseope. The first 
and second photo- 
graphs illustrale 
Galileo's observa- 
tion that noticeable 
changes oecur within a 
single night. ( Yerkes 
Obsercatory photo- 

288 Universal gravitation 

4-S-A»? i 




d -7- M r. *^_^>D^ 



■ #r>_ 


jf * 

T' .=: 

<a.6?M/ *■ 

<-* r- tf- r V 


Kr. W 

4- «' o v*—* «"'*•' 

0***-* + 

Fig. 8-24(b) Facsimile of a page of Golileo's own 
handwritten records ofhis observations diiring the later 
months (July-October) of 1610. 

Fig. 8-24(c) A graph 
conslrucied from 
Galileo's own records, 
showing the periodic 
mol ion ofCallisto, the 
outermost of the four 
satellites visible to 
Mm. The period of 
about 16 3/4 days is 
clearly exhibited. 

M " *" '° " " * 

289 The raoons of Jupiter 

countryman Lagrange. It turned out that a curious kind of 
resonance effect was at work, resulting from the fact that the 
periods of Jupiter and Saturn are almost in a simple arithmetic 


Satellile n = r/Rj 

Period (T) 

n 3 /T 2 , sec~ 2 





5.578 1.7699 days « 1.53 X 10 5 sec 7.4 X 10-° 

8.876 3.5541 days « 3.07 X 10 5 sec 7.5 X 10~ 9 

14.159 7.1650 days « 6.19 X 10 5 sec 7.5X10-° 

24.903 16.7536 days « 1.45 X 10 6 sec 7.4 X IO" 9 

Fig. 8-25 A log-log 
grapli displaying the 
applicabilily of 
Kepler's thitd law IO 
the Galilean satellites 
of Jupiter. It may be 
seen that Calileo's 
results are little dif- 
ferent from those ob- 
tained by John Flam- 
steed nearly 100 years 

"Thcse same data have been presented in a striking way in Eric Rogers, 
Physicsfor the Inauiring Mind, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 
N.J., 1960: 




T 2 , 

(hours) 2 


1.803 X 10" 

1.803 X 10 3 


7.261 X 10 10 

7.264 X 10 3 


29.473 X 10 lfl 

29.484 X 10 3 


160.440 X 10 16 

160.430 X 10 3 

How would you convince your friends that this close numerical coin- 
cidencc is not evidence of a new fundamental law? 

290 Universal gravitation 

relationship (5Tj » 2T S )- This made large an otherwise negligible 
term in the perturbation, with a repetition period so long 
(~900 yr) that it seemed to be increasing without limit. When 
the mystery was finally resolved the belief in Newton's theory 
was, of course, strengthened still further. 


Probably the most vivid illustration of the power of the gravita- 
tional theory has been the prediction and discovery of planets 
whose very existence had not previously been suspected. It is 
noteworthy that' the number of known planets remained un- 
changed from the days of antiquity until long after Newton. 
Then, in 1781, William Herschel noticed the object that we now 
know as Uranus. He was engaged in a systematic survey of the 
stars, and his only clue to start with was that the object seemed 
slightly less pointlike than the neighboring stars. Then, having 
a telescope with various degrees of magnification, he confirmed 
that the size of the image increased with magnification, which 
is not true for the stars — they remain below the limit of resolution 
of even the biggest telescopes, and always produce images in- 
distinguishable from those due to ideal point sources. 

Once his attention had been drawn to the object, Herschel 
returned to it night after night and confirmed that it was moving 
with respect to the other stars. Also, as has happened in various 
other cases, it was found that the existence of the object had in 
fact been recorded i n earlier star maps (first by John Flamsteed 
in 1690). These old data suddenly became extremely valuable, 
because they were a ready-made record of the object's move- 
ments dating back through nearly a century. When combined 
with new measurements carried out over many months, they 
showed that the object (finally to be called Uranus) was indeed 
a member of our solar system, following an almost circular orbit 
with a mean radius of 19.2 AU and a period of 84 years. 

This is where our main story begins. Once it was discovered, 
Uranus and its motions became the subject of a continuing study, 
and cvidence began to accumulate that there were some ex- 
tremely small irregularities in its motion that could not be 
aseribed to perturbing effects from any known source. Figure 
8-26(a), a tribute to the wonderful precision of astronomical 
observation, shows the anomaly as a funetion of time since 1690. 
The suspicion began to grow that perhaps there was yet another 

291 The discovery of Neptune 

Fig. 8-26 (a) Unexplained residual devialions in the 
observed positions of Uranus between 1690 and 1840. 
(b) Basis ofascribing the devialions lo the influence of 
an extra planet. The arrows indicate the relalive mag- 
nitude of the perturbing force a t dijferent times. 

planet beyond Uranus, unknown in mass, period, or distance. 
Two men — J. C. Adams in England and U. J. LeVerrier in 
Francc — indepcndcntly workcd on the problem. Both men used 

292 Universal gravitation 

as a starting point the assumption that the orbital radius of the 
unknown planet was almost exactly twice that of Uranus. The 
basis of this was a curious empirical relation, known as Bode's 
law (actually discovered by J. D. Titius in 1772, but publicized 
by J. Bode), which expresses the fact that the orbital radii of the 
known planets can be roughly fitted by the following formula: 

R„ (AU) = 0.4 + (0.3X2") 

where n is an appropriate integer for each planet. Putting n = 0, 
1, 2, we get the approximate radii for Venus, earth, and Mars 
(Mercury requires n = — cc, which is hard to defend). Using 
n = 4, 5, and 6 one gets quite good values for Jupiter, Saturn, 
and Uranus. (The missing integer, n = 3, corresponds to the 
asteroid belt.) Figure 8-27 shows this relation of orbital radii 
with the help of a semilog plot; it is clear that a simple exponential 
relation (linear on this graph) works almost as well, but if one 
accepts Bode's law, then n = 7 gives r = 38.8 AU, and this is 
what Adams and LeVerrier used. 

Fig. 8-27 Graph for 
predicting the orbital 
radius of the new 
planet with the help of 
Bode's law. 

293 The discovery of Neplune 

Given the radius, the period is automatically defined by 
Kepler's third law, and then it becomes possible to construct a 
definite picture, as shown in Fig. 8-26(b), of the way in which 
the new planet could alternately accelerate and retard Uranus 
in its orbital motion, depending on their relative positions. With 
the help of laborious analysis, onc can then deduce where in its 
orbit the new planet should be on a particular date. Adams 
supplied such information in October 1845 to the British Astron- 
omer Royal, G. B. Airy, who acknowledged Adams' letter, 
raised a question of detail, but otherwise did nothing. LeVerrier 
did not complete his own calculations until August 1846, but 
the astronomer to whom he wrote (J. G. Galle, in Germany) 
made an immediate search and identified the new planet 
(Neptune) on his very first night of observation. It was only 
about a degree from the predicted position (see Fig. 8-28). The 
next night it had visibly shifted, thereby confirming its planetary 

Although the discovery of Neptune is in some respects a 
great success story, it is also a story of luck, both good and bad, 
and of human frailty. Adams was really first in the field, but he 
received no support from his seniors (he was fresh from his 
bachelor's degree when he bcgan his calculations). Airy missed 

Fig. 8-28 Star map 
showing the discovery 
of Neptune, September 
23, 1846. (From 
Herbert Hal/ Turner, 
Astronomical Dis- 
covery, Edward 
Arnold, London, 

• -. 


O . 

« *. 

' • 

f -, -■ . 
■m m » a 


i • • 4 l t r • 

• (•••«« • 

294 Universal gravitation 

the credit, which he might readily have won, of being the man 
who first identified Neptune. But the locations that both Adams 
and LeVerrier predicted might well have been hopclessly mis- 
leading, for in their reliance on Bode's law they used an orbital 
radius (and hence a period) that was far from correct. The true 
value is about 30 AU instead of nearly 40 as they had assumed, 
which means that they overestimated the period by nearly 50%. ' 
It was therefore largely a lucky accident that the planet was so 
near to its predicted position on the particular date that Galle 
sought and found it. But let this not be taken as disparagement. 
A great discovery was made, with the help of the laws of motion 
and the gravitational foree law, and it remains as the most 
triumphant confirmation of the dynamical model of the universe 
that Newton invented. 2 The discovery of Pluto by C. Tombaugh 
in 1930, on the basis of a detailed record of the irregularities of 
Neptune's own motion, provided an echo of the original achieve- 


When Newton wrote his System of the World, nothing was 
known about the distances or possible motions of the stars. 
They simply provided a seemingly fixed background against which 
the dynamics of the solar system proceeded. There were ex- 
ceptions. A few prominent stars— e.g., Sirius— known since 
antiquity by naked-eye astronomy, were found to have shifted 
position within historic time. But the serious and systematic 
investigation of stellar motions was begun by William Herschel. 
His observations, continued and refined by his son John Her- 
schel and by other astronomers, revealed two classes of results. 
The first was the continuing apparent displacement of individual 
stars in a way that suggested that the solar system is itself in- 
volvcd in a general movement of the stars in our neighborhood, 
at a speed of the order of 10 miles/sec (comparable to the earth's 
own orbital speed around the sun). This, as it stood, was just 
an empirical faet. But the second type of result pointed directly 

■This also means that they overestimated the mass necessary to produce the 
observed perturbations of Uranus. LeVerrier gave a figure of about 35 times 
the mass of the earth; the currently accepted value is about half this. 
2 For a detailed account of the whole matler, see H. H. Turner, Astronomku! 
Discovery, Edward Arnold, London, 1904. A shorter but more readily 
accessible account may be found in an essay entitled "John Couch Adams 
and the Discovery of Neptune," by Sir H. Spencer Jones, in The World of 
Mathemaiks (J. R. Newman, ed.), Simon and Schuster, New York, 1956. 

295 Gravitation outside the solar system 

Scale (secondsof arc) 

Fig. 8-29 Varialion 
willi lime oflhe rela- 
live position vector of 
the members ofa 
double-star syslem. 
(After Arthur Berry, 
A Short History of 
Astronomy, 1898; 
reprinted by Dover 
Publications, New 
York, 1961.) 


1864 /*" 






•l84o" * 1895 

• 1890 

to the operation of Newton's dynamics. For the Herschels 
discovered numerous pairs of stars that were evidently orbiting 
around one another as binary systems. Figure 8-29 shows one 
of the best documented early examplcs, and the first to be sub- 
jccted to a detailed analysis in terms of Kepler's laws. (It is 
£-Ursae, in one of the hind paws of the constellation known as 
the Grcat Bear.) 

The period of a binary star depends on the total mass of the 
system, not on the individual masses. This is easily proved in 
the case in which the orbits are assumed to be circles around the 
common center of mass [see Fig. 8-30(a)]. ' The individual 
stars are always at opposite ends of a straight line passing through 
the center, C. If we write the statement of F = ma for one of the 
stars, say mi, we have 

, /W2WI1 
(r. + r 2 )2 


= miu r\ 

where w (= 2tt/T) is the angular velocity common to both stars. 


CO = 


ri(ri + r 2 ) 2 
■For a full discussion of the concept of center of mass, sce Ch. 9, p. 337. 

296 Universal gravitation 


Fig. 8-30 (a) Motion 
ofthe members of a 
binary star system 
with respect to the 
center of mass. C, for 
the case ofcircular 
orbits. (b) Direct 
visual euidence of the 
motion of a binary 
system — Krueger 60, 
photographed by E. E. 
Barnard. (Yerkes 
Obseroatory photo- 


However, by the definition of the center of mass, we have 

'i = 

mi + rri2 


r = n + ri 
It follows at once that 

2 G(m\ + m 2 ) 

03 = r, 

Thus if the distance r between the stars can be obtained by 
direct astronomical observation (e.g., starting from a knowledge 
of their angular scparation), the sum of the masses is at once 
determined. Finding the individual masses entails the somewhat 
harder job of measuring the motion of each star in absolute 
terms against the background ofthe "fixed" stars. Figure 8-30(b) 
shows convincing direct evidence of the orbital motion of an 
actual binary system. 

297 Gravitation outside the solar system 

Fig. 8-31 Rotating 
galaxy (spiral galaxy 
NGC 5194 in the 
constellation Canes 
Venatici). (Photo- 
graph from the Hale 

With the development of modern astronomy, the systematic 
motions of our sun and its neighbors came to be seen as part 
of a greater scheme of movements controlled by gravity. AU 
around us throughout the universe were the immense stellar 
systems— the galaxies— most of them vividly suggesting a state 
of general rotation, as i n Fig. 8-31, for example. The most 
difficult structurc to elucidate was the onc in which we ourselves 
are embedded, i.e., the Milky Way galaxy. It finally became 
clear, however, that its basic structure is very much like that of 
Fig. 8-31, and that in it our sun is describing some kind of orbit 
around the center, with a radius of about 3 X 10 20 m (= 30,000 
light-years) and an estimated period of about 250 million years 
(=» 8 X 10 ,5 sec). Using these figures we can infer the ap- 

298 Universal gravitation 

proximate gravitating mass, inside the orbit, that would define 
this motion. From Eq. (8-24) we have 


With G = 7 X 10~" m 3 /kg-sec 2 , we find that 

m ~ 40 v 3 X1 ° G1 « 3 x 10 41 ke 

Since the mass of the sun (a typical star) is about 2 X 10 30 kg, 
we see that a core of about 10" stars is implied. This is not 
really a figure that can be independently checked. It is a kind 
of ultimate tribute to our belief in the universality of the gravita- 
tional law that it is confidently used to draw conclusions like 
those above concerning masses of galactic systems. 


We have described carlier how Newton rccognized that the 
proportionality of weight to inertial mass is a fact of fundamental 
significance; it played a central role in leading him to the con- 
clusion that his law of gravitation must be a general law of 
nature. For Newton this was a strictly dynamical result, ex- 
pressing the basic properties of the force law. But Albert Einstein, 
in 1915, looked at the situation through new eyes. For him the 
fact that all objects fail toward the earth with the same accelera- 
tion g, whatcver their size or physical state or composition, 
implied that this must be in some truly profound way a kinematic 
or geometrical result, not a dynamical one. He regarded it as 
being on a par with Galileo's law of inertia, which expressed the 
tendeney of objects to persist in straight-line motion. 

Building on these ideas, Einstein developed the theory that 
a planet (for example) follows its charaeteristie path around the 
sun because in so doing it is traveling along what is called a 
geodesic line — that is to say, the most economical way of getting 
from one point to another. His proposition was that although 
in the absence of massive objects the geodesic path is a straight 
line in the Euclidean sense, the presence of an extremely massive 
object such as the sun modifies the geometry locally so that the 
geodesies become curved lines. The state of affairs in the vicinity 

299 Einsteirrs theorv o! gravitation 

of a massive object is, in this view, to be interpreted not in terms 
of a gravitational field of force but in terms of a "curvature of 
space" — a facile phrase that covers an abstract and mathe- 
matically complex description of non-Euclidean geometries. 

For the most part the Einstein theory of gravitation gives 
results indistinguishable from Ncwton's; the grounds for pre- 
ferring it might seem to be conceptual rather than practical. 
But in one celebrated instance of planetary motions there is a 
real discrepancy that favors Einstein's theory. This is in the 
so-called "precession of the perihelion" of Mercury. The phe- 
nomenon is that the orbit of Mercury, which is distinctly el- 
liptical in shapc, very gradually rotates or precesses in its own 
planc, so that the major axis is along a slightly different direction 
at the end of each complete revolution. Most of this precession 
(amounting to about 10 minutes of arc per century) can be 
understood in terms of the disturbing effects of the other planets 
according to Newton's law of gravitation. ' But there remains a 
tiny, obstinate residual rotation equal to 43 seconds of arc per 
century. The attempts to explain it on Newtonian theory — for 
example by postulating an unobserved planet inside Mercury's 
own orbit — all came to grief by conflicting with other facts of 
observation concerning the solar system. Einstein's theory, on 
the other hand, without the use of any adjustable parameters, 
led to a calculated precession rate that agreed exactly with 
observation. It corresponded, in effect, to the existence of a very 
small force with a different dependence on distance than the 
dominant l/r 2 force of Newton's theory. The way in which a 
disturbing effect of this kind causes the orbit to precess is dis- 
cussed in Chapter 13. Other cmpirical modifications of the 
basic law of gravitation — small departures from the inverse- 
square law — had been tried before Einstein developed his theory, 
but apart from their arbitrary character they also led to false 
predictions for the other planets. In Einstein's theory, however, 
it emerged automatically that the size of the disturbing term was 
proportional to the square of the angular velocity of the planet 
and hence was much more important for Mercury, with its 
short period, than for any of the other planets. 

■The apparent amount of precession as viewed from the earth is aclually 
about 1.5° per century, but most of this is due to the continuous change in 
the direction of the earth's own axis (the precession of the equinoxes — see 
Chapter 14). 

300 Universal gravitation 


8-1 Given a knowledge of Kepler's third law as it applies to the 
solar system, together with the knowledge that the disk of the sun 
subtends an angle of about £° at the earth, deduce the period of a 
hypothetical planet in a circular orbit that skims the surface of the sun. 

8-2 It is well known that the gap between the four inner planets and 
the five outer planets is occupied by the asteroid belt instead of by a 
tenth planet. This asteroid belt extends over a range of orbital radii 
from about 2.5 to 3.0 AU. Calculate the corresponding range of 
periods, expressed as multiples of the earth's year. 

8-3 It is proposed to put up an earth satellite in a circular orbit with 
a period of 2 hr. 

(a) How high above the earth's surface would it have to be? 

(b) If its orbit were in the plane of the earth's equator and in 
the same direction as the earth's rotation, for how long would it be 
continuously visible from a given place on the equator at sea level? 

8-4 A satellite is to be placed in synchronous circular orbit around 
the planet Jupiter to study the famous "red spot" in Jupiter's lower 
atmosphere. How high above the surface of Jupiter will the satellite 
be? The rotation period of Jupiter is 9.9 hr, its mass Mj is about 
320 times the earth's mass, and its radius Rj is about 11 times that 
of the earth. You may find it convenient to calculate first the gravita- 
tional acceleration gj at Jupiter's surface as a multiple of g, using the 
above values of Mj and R Jt and then use a relationship analogous to 
that developed in the text for earth satellites [Eq. (8-16) or (8-17)]. 

8-5 A satellite is to be placed in a circular orbit 10 km above the 
surface of the moon. What must be its orbital speed and what is the 
period of revolution ? 

8-6 A satellite is to be placed in synchronous circular earth orbit. 
The satellite's power supply is expected to last 10 years. If the maxi- 
mum acceptable eastward or westward drift in the longitude of the 
satellite during its lifetime is 10°, what is the margin of error in the 
radius of its orbit? 

8-7 The springs found in retractable ballpoint pens have a relaxed 
length of about 3 cm and a spring constant of perhaps 0.05 N/mm. 
Imagine that two lead spheres, each of 10,000 kg, are placed on a 
frictionless surface so that onc of thesc springs just fits, in its un- 
compressed state, between their nearcst points. 

(a) How much would the spring be compressed by the mutual 
gravitational attraction of the two spheres? The density of lead is 
about 1 1,000 kg/m 3 . 

301 Problcms 

(b) Let the system be rotatcd in the horizontal plane. At what 
frequency of rotation would the presencc of the spring become ir- 
relevant to the separation of the masses? 

8-8 During the cighteenth century, an ingenious attempt to find the 
mass of the earth was made by the British Astronomer Royal, Nevil 
Maskelyne. He observed the extent to which a plumbline was pulled 
out of true by the gravitational attraction of a mountain. The figure 
illustrates the principle of the method. The change of direction of the 
plumbline was measured between the two sides of the mountain. 

(This was donc by sighting on stars.) After allowance had been made 
for the change in direction of the local vertical because of the curvature 
of the earth, the residual angular difference a was given by 2Fm/Fb, 
where ±Fm is the horizontal force on the plumb-bob due to the moun- 
tain, and Fe = GM E m/RE^. (m is the mass of the plumb-bob.) 

The value of a is about 10 seconds of arc for measurements on 
opposite sides of the base of a mountain about 2000 m high. Suppose 
that the mountain can be approximated by a cone of rock (of density 
2.5 times that of water) whose radius at the base is equal to the height 
and whose mass can be considered to be concentrated at the center 
of the base. Deduce an approximate value of the earth's mass from 
these figures. (The true answer is about 6 X 10 24 kg.) Compare the 
gravitational deflection a to the change of direction associated with 
the earth's curvature in this experiment. 

8-9 Imagine that in a certain region of the ocean floor there is a 
roughly cone-shaped mound of granite 250 m high and 1 km in diam- 
eter. The surrounding floor is relatively flat for tens of kilometers in 
all directions. The ocean depth in the region is 5 km and the density 
of the granite is 3000 kg/m 3 . Could the mound's prcscnce be de- 
tected by a surface vessel equipped with a gravity meter that can 
detect a change in g of 0.1 mgal? 

(Hint: Assume that the field produced by the mound at the 
surface can be approximated by the field of a mass point of the same 
total mass locatcd at the level of the surrounding floor. Note that in 
calculating the change in g you must keep in mind that the mound 
has displaccd its own volume of water. The density of water, even at 
such depths, can be taken as about equal to its surface value of about 
1000 kg/m 3 . 

302 Universal gravitation 

8-10 Show that the period of a particle that moves in a circular orbit 
close to the surface of a sphere depends only on G and the mean 
density of the sphere. Deduce what this period would be for any 
sphere having a mean density equal to the density of water. (Jupiter 
almost corresponds to this case.) 

8-11 Calculate the mean density of the sun, given a knowledge of G, 
the length of the earth's year, and the fact that the sun's diameter 
subtends an angle of about 0.55° at the earth. 

8-12 An astronaut who can lift 50 kg on earth is exploring a planetoid 
(roughly spherical) of 10 km diameter and density 3500 kg/m 3 . 

(a) How large a rock can he pick up from the planetoid's surface, 
assuming that he finds a well-placed handle? 

(b) The astronaut observes a rock falling from a cliff. The 
rock's radius is only 1 m and as it approaches the surface its velocity 
is 1 m/sec. Should he try to catch it? (This is obviously a fanciful 
problem. One would not expect a planetoid to have cliffs or loose 
rocks, even if an astronaut were to get there in the first place.) 

8-13 It is pointed out in the text that a person can properly be termed 
"weightless" when he is in a satellite circling the earth. The moon is a 
satellite, yet it is noted in many discussions that we would weigh | of 
our normal weight there. Is there a contradiction here? 

8-14 A dedicated scientist performs the following experiment. After 
installing a huge spring at the bottom of a 20-story-high elevator shaft, 
he takes the elevator to the top, positions himself on a bathroom scale 
inside the airtight car with a stopwatch and with pad and pencil to 
record the scale reading, and directs an assistant to cut the car's 
support cable at I = 0. Presuming that the scientist survives the 
first encounter with the spring, sketch a graph of his measured weight 
versus time from / = up to the beginning of the second bounce. 
(Note: Twenty stories is ample distance for the elevator to acquire 
terminal velocity.) 

8-15 A planet of mass M and a single satellite of mass M/10 revolve 
in circular orbits about their stationary center of mass, being held 
together by their gravitational attraction. The distance between their 
centers is D. 

(a) What is the period of this orbital motion? 

(b) What fraction of the total kinetic energy rcsides in the 

(Ignore any spin of planet and satellite about their own axes.) 

8-16 We have considered the problem of the moon's orbit around 
the earth as if the earth's center represented a fixed point about which 
the motion takes place. In fact, however, the earth and the moon 
revolve about their common center of mass. 

303 Problems 

(a) Calculate the position of the center of mass, given that the 
earth's mass is 81 limes that of the moon and that the distance be- 
tween their centers is 60 earth radii. 

(b) How much longer would the month be if the moon were of 
negligible mass compared to the earth ? 

8-17 The sun appears to be moving at a speed of about 250km/sec 
in a circular orbit of radius about 25,000 light-years around the center 
of our galaxy. (One light-year^ 10 10 m.) The earth takes 1 year to 
describe an almost circular orbit of radius about 1.5 X 10" m around 
the sun. What do these facts imply about the total mass responsible 
for keeping the sun in its orbit? Obtain this mass as a multiple of the 
sun's mass M. (Note that you do not need to introduce the numerical 
value of G to obtain the answer.) 

8—18 (A good problem for discussion.) In 1747 Georges Louis Lesage 
explained the inverse-square law of gravitation by postulating that 
vast numbers of invisible particles were flying through space in all 
directions at high speeds. Objects like the sun and planets block these 
particles, leading to a shadowing effect that has the same quantitative 
result as a gravitational attraction. Consider the arguments for and 
against this theory. 

(Suggestion: First consider a theory in which opaque objects 
block the particles completely. This proposal is fairly easy to refute. 
Next consider a theory in which the attenuation of the particles by 
objecls is incomplete or even vcry small. This theory is much harder 
to dismiss.) 

8-19 The continuous output of energy by the sun corresponds (through 
Einstein's relation E = Mc 2 ) to a steady decrease in its mass M, at 
the rate of about 4 X 10° tons/sec. This implies a progressive in- 
crease in the orbital periods of the planets, because for an orbit of a 
given radius we have T~ A/ - " 2 [cf Eq. (8-23)]. 

A precise analysis of the effect must take into account the fact 
that as M decreases the orbital radius itself increases — the planets 
gradually spiral away from the sun. However, one can get an order- 
of-magnitude estimate of the size of the effect, albeit a little bit on the 
low side, by assuming that r remains constant. (See Problem 13-21 
for a more rigorous treatment.) 

Using the simplifying assumption of constant r, estimate the 
approximate increasc in the length of the year resulting from the sun's 
decrease in mass over the timc span of accurate astronomical ob- 
servations— about 2500 years. 

8-20 It is mentioned at the end of the chapter how Einstein's theory 
of gravitation leads to a small correetion term on top of the basic 
Newtonian foree of gravitation. For a planet of mass m, traveling at 
speed o in a circular orbit of radius r, the gravitational foree becomes 

304 Universal gravitation 

in effect the following: 
_ GMm 



where c is the speed of light. (Correction terms of the order of v 2 /c 2 
are typical of relativistic effects.) 

(a) Show that, if the period under a pure Newtonian force 
GMm/r 2 is denoted by 7"o, the modified period T is given approxi- 
mately by 


(Treat the relativistic correction as representing, in effect, a small 
fractional increase in the value of G, and use the value of v corre- 
sponding to the Newtonian orbit.) 

(b) Hence show that, in each revolution, a planet in a circular 
orbit would travel through an angle greater by about 24T 3 r 2 /c 2 To 2 
than under the pure Newtonian force, and that this is also expressible 
as 6irGM/c 2 r, where M is the mass of the sun. 

(c) Apply these results to the planet Mercury and verify that 
the accumulated advance in angle amounts to about 43 seconds of 
arc per century. This corresponds to what is called the precession 
of its orbit. 

305 Problcms 

God . . . created matter with motion and rest in its parts, 
and . . . now conserves in the universe, by His ordinary 
operations, as much of motion and of rest as He originally 

rene descartes, Principia Philosophiae (1644) 


Collisions and 
conservation laws 

in this chapter we shall be discussing some concepts and results 
that are at the very heart of mechanics. They are rooted in the 
fact that it takes at least two particles to make a dynamical 
system. Until now we have rather glossed over that fact, by 
talking in terms of individual particles subjected to forces of 
various kinds. Thus, for example, the motion of a planet around 
the sun, or of an electron between the deflection plates of a 
cathode-ray tube, was discussed as the problem of a single par- 
ticle exposed to the force supplied by some completely immovable 
body or structure. But this is a very special way of looking at 
things and is not in general justified. The sun pulls on a planet 
and gives it an acceleration, to be sure, but the law of gravitation 
doesn't play favorites — it has a completely symmetrical form — 
and the planet pulls back on the sun with an equal and opposite 
force. So the sun must accelerate, too, and will follow some kind 
of path under the combined action of all the planets. It happens 
that the sun is hundreds of times more massive than the rest of 
the solar system put together, so that to a first approximation 
we can ignore its wanderings. But this is only an accident of 
disparity. The basic dynamical system is made up of two inter- 
acting particles, the motions of both of which must be con- 
sidered. The experimental study of such systems, via collision 
processes, was in fact the true starting point of dynamics. The 
study of collisions has lost none of its importance to physics in 


the 300 years since it first became a subject of exact investigation ; 
let us then consider it with care. 


In 1668 the Royal Society of London 1 put out a request for the 
experimental clarification of collision phenomena. Contribu- 
tions were submitted shortly afterward by John Wallis (mathe- 
matician), Sir Christopher Wren (architect), and Christian 
Huygens (physicist, and Newton's great Dutch contemporary). 
The results embody what we are familiar with today as the rules 
governing exchanges of momentum and energy in the collision 
between two objects. Most importantly, they involve at one 
stroke the concept of inertial mass and the principle of con- 
servation of linear momentum. 

These experiments revealed that the decisive quantity in a 
collision is what Newton called "the quantity of motion," defined 
as the product of the velocity of a body and the quantity of matter 
in it— this latter being what we have called the inertial mass. 
We have already (in Chapter 6) discussed Newton's straight- 
forward concept of mass: how he was quite ready to assume that 
the total mass of two objects together is just the sum of their 
separate masses, and how he took it for granted that the masses of 
difierently sized portions of a homogeneous material are pro- 
portional to their volumes. You will recall from our earlier 
diseussion that these assumptions, however reasonable they may 
seem, are not always strictly justified. On the other hand, their 
use does not lead to detectable inconsistencies in the dynamics 
of ordinary objects. And what Newton and his contemporaries 
found was that, if these commonsense ideas were accepted as a 
quantitative basis for relating masses, then a very simple de- 
seription of all collisions could be made, which expressed mathe- 
matically is as follows: 

m\u\ + m-iu-i = mwi + /M2t"2 (9-1) 

wherc M] and u t are the velocities before impaet, and v x and v 2 
are the velocities after impaet (a one-dimensional motion is 
assumed). This is a very powerful generalization, because it 

'The Society was formally chartered in 1662. (Newton was its President 
from 1703 until his death in 1727.) Several other great European seientific 
academies came into existence at about the same period. 

308 Collisions and conservalion Uiws 

applies to quite different sorts of collisions— those with almost 
perfect rebound, such as occur between two glass spheres, down 
to thosc with no rebound at all, as between two lumps of putty. 
Qualitatively, collisions can be described in terms of their degree 
of elasticity— i.e., bounciness. A quantitative but purely em- 
pirical measure of this, used by Newton and others, is the ratio 
of v 2 — v y (the relative velocity after impact) to Ui — u> (the 
relative velocity before impact). If this ratio is zero, the collision 
is called completely inelastic. If the ratio is unity, the collision is 
called elastic (somctimes, more vividly, "perfectly elastic"). A 
hardened steel ball is much more elastic than a rubber ball in 
this sense. In the early investigations Wallis confined his studies 
to completely inelastic collisions, Wren and Huygens to almost 
perfectly elastic objects, and Newton, some time later, added 
experiments on objects of intermediate elasticity. 


The physicist is always on the lookout for quantities that remain 
conserued (i.e., unehanged) in physical processes. Once he has 
discovered such quantities, they become powerful tools in his 
analysis of phenomena. They start out by being just an aid in 
codifying pasi experience. But as they are found to be applicable 
to more and more new instances, their value grows and one begins 
to make confident predielions with their help. The statement 
about conservation of a particular quantity is promoted to the 
status of a conservation law. If in some new instance the con- 
servation law appears to break down, one's faith in the law may 
be so great that one hunts around for the missing piece. Should 
it be found, the conservation law is strengthened still further. 
Thus, for example, the law of conservation of mass in chemical 
reaetions is accepted as a guide to all possible measurements on 
the masses of the reaeting materials. When the chemical balance 
was first applied to the study of chemical reaetions, it appeared 
that in some processes mass was gained, in some it was Iost, and 
in some it remained unehanged. But when Lavoisier proved, 
through numerous examples, that mass was merely transferred, 
and that in a elosed system it was conserved, the whole seheme 
became clear. Chemists could then exp]oit the conservation law. 
For example, they could confidently infer the mass of a gaseous 
produet (eseaping from an unclosed system) from easily made 
measurements on solid and Iiquid reactants. 

309 The conservation of linear momentum 

Some of the most powerful aspects of our physical descrip- 
tion of the world are embodied in statements about conserved 
quantities. In mechanics the law of conservation of linear mo- 
mentum is such a statement — one might even claim that it is 
the most important single principle in dynamics. It is based 
directly on the results of the experiments on impact as sum- 
marized in Eq. (9-1). If, for a given particle, we introduce the 
single word momentum to describe the product mv, then we have 
a compact statement: 

Tbe total momentum of the system of two colliding particles re- 
mains unchanged by the collision, i. e., the total linear momentum 
is a conserved quantity. 

Underlying this generalization concerning two-particle col- 
lisions is the tacit assumption that the system is effectively isolated 
— the particles interact with each other but not with anything 
else. In the experiments of Newton and others this was achieved 
by hanging the colliding objects on long strings, so that they 
swung as pendulums and collided at the lowest point of their 
swing. In the brief duration of the impact, therefore, the objects 
were essentially free of all horizontal forces except those provided 
by their mutual interaction. 

Since the momentum carried by an object is given, in 
Newton's words, by "the velocity and the quantity of matter 
conjointly," — i.e., by the value of the product mv and not by the 
values of m and v separately 1 — it is convenient to introduce a 
single symbol, p, to represent the momentum of a mass m moving 
along a given line with velocity v. The relation 

Pi + P'i = const. (9-2) 

then describes the conservation of momentum in two-body 
collisions of the type studied by Newton and his contemporaries. 


We have based our discussion so far on one-dimensional col- 
lisions. It is important to appreciate, however, that — as is 
apparent from its definition — the momentum of a particle is a 
vector quantity having the same direction as the velocity of the 

■So that, for example, a body of mass \m traveling with velocity 2v has the 
same momentum as m traveling with v. 

310 Collisions and conservation laws 

particle. Thus our statement of the conservation of linear mo- 
mentum in a collision between two bodies should really be 
written as follows: 

Pli + P2i = pi/ + P2/ (9-3) 

where the subscripts i and / are used to denote initial and final 
values, respectively (i.e., precollision and postcollision). 

This single vector equation defines the magnitude and the 
direction of any one of the momentum vectors if the other three 
are known. It will very often be convenient to separate Eq. (9-3) 
into three equations in terms of the resolved parts of the vectors 
along three mutually orthogonal axes (x, y, z). Each of these 
component equations must then be separately satisfied. Thus, for 
example, if two bodies, of masses m i and m 2 , have initial and 
final velocities U|, u 2 and Vi, v 2 , Eq. (9-3) becomes 

«mi + m2U2 = mivi + /H2V2 (9-4) 

which contains the following three independen! statements: 

m\u\ x + nt2U2r = fltiPia + m 2 D 2 z 

miui,, + nt2U 2 y = miviy + m 2 02 V (9-5) 

ntiui, + JW2«2. = mivi, + /W202. 

In carrying out actual numerical calculations this resolution of 
the vectors will often be necessary. But manipulations involving 
unspecified masses and velocities are best made in terms of the 
unresolved equations (9-3) or (9-4), without reference to any 
particular coordinate system. This is, indeed, one of the main 
strengths (and economies) of using vector notation. 

Example. An object of mass 5 kg, traveling horizontally on 
a frictionless surface at 16 m/sec, strikes a stationary object of 
mass 3 kg. After the collision, the 5-kg object is observed to 
have a velocity of magnitude 1 2 m/sec at 30° to its original 
direction of motion, as shown in Fig. 9-1. What is the velocity 
of the 3-kg object? We can choose an xy plane that contains 
all the velocity vectors. Let the +x axis lie along the original 
direction of motion of the 5-kg object (particle 1). Let us denote 
the initial momentum of the 5-kg object as p u, and the final 
momenta as pi/ and p 2 /. Then we have 

Pii : = Pi/ + P2/ (sincep 2 , = 0) 

P2/ = Pl. - Pl/ = Pli + ( — Pl/) 

311 Momentum as a vector quantity 

Fig. 9-1 Conserva- | 
t ion ofthe total vector | 
momentum 'm a sim- 
ple collision. 

Figure 9-1 shows the vector construction by which p 2 / can be 
found. The length of p h represcnts, on some appropriate scale, 
the initial momentum of 80 kg-m/sec. The length of — Pi/ is 
60 kg-m/sec, and its direction is as shown. The length and 
direction of p 2 / can be found directly from the vector triangle, 
and v 2 / is found as p 2 /Aw 2 . 

Alternatively, we can write down the momentum conserva- 
tion in component form. First, let us list the known quantities: 

m\ = 5 kg W2 = 3 kg 
u\ z = 16 m/sec «2x = 

«1„ = K2„ = 

v\ x = 6\/3 m/sec 
i;i„ = 6 m/sec 

Thus we have [using Eq. (9-5)] 

Along x: 80 = 30\/3 + 3t> 2 , 
Along^: = 30 + 3l>2» 


U2l = (80 - 30\/3)/3 « 9.3 m/sec 

l- 2 „ = — 10.0 m/sec 

f 2 = [(9.3) 2 + (10.0) 2 ]" 2 « 13.6 m/sec 

The direction of v 2 is at an angle d to the x axis such that 

„ V2 U 10.0 

tan 5 = -S = - — :- 
«2x 9.3 

9 « -47° 

312 Collisions and conservation laws 

Notice that this result has been obtained through momentum 
conservation alone; it requires no knowledge of the detailed 
interaction between the objects. Relating the momentum changes 
of the individual objects to the forces acting on them during the 
collision will, however, be our next concern. 



No. 1 

We shall begin this discussion with an analysis along the lines 
that Newton himself used. Later we shall draw attention to a 
somewhat different approach, which can be more readily adapted 
to relativistic dynamics, although it is in harmony with Ncwton's 
analysis within the confines of classical mechanics. 

Newton interpreted the collision experiments from the stand- 
point that the concept of inertial mass of an individual object is 
already established by experiments and arguments like those we 
made use of in Chapter 6. In that case, Eq. (9-4) is a summary 
of the actual experimental observations; the *'quantity of motion" 
is conserved. One can then, by using F = ma, draw conclusions 
about the forces acting during the collision. A collision is a 
process involving two objects, each of which exerts a force on 
the other. Object 1 exerts a force Fi 2 on object 2; object 2 exerts 
a force F 2 i on object 1 (Fig. 9-2). We make no assumptions 
about the relationship between the two forces, except that they 
act for equal times. This last assumption is certainly reasonable, 
because we recognize that the forces come into being as a result 
of the collision, and surely the duration of the collision must be 
the same for both objects. ' We can then take the statement of 
F = ma as it applies to each object separately: 

F21 = miai F12 = »1282 


F21 F12 
ai = &2 = 

Fig. 9-2 Inferring the equalily of action and reaction 
forces from the fact of momentum conservation. 


■Yet this is anolher of those intuitively "obvious" conditions that is not bind- 
ing and indeed has to bc qualified in some of the collision problems that re- 
quire the use of special relativity. 

313 Action, reaction, and impulse 

Suppose, to simplify this present argument, that each force re- 
mains constant throughout a collision that lasts for a time At. 
Then we have 

Tl = ui + — A/ v 2 - u 2 + — At (9-7) 

mi rri2 

where Ui and a 2 are the initial velocities of the two objects and 
?i and v 2 are their final velocities. From these equations we 
therefore have 

mivi = /miui + F2jA/ 

W2V2 = W2U2 + F\2At 

Adding these two, we thus get 

/KlVl + WJ2V2 = /MlUl + /M2U2 + (F21 + Fi2>A/ (9-8) 

Experimentally, however, we have Eq. (9-4). We deduce, there- 
fore, that 

F21 + F J2 = 


F21 = -F12 (9-9) 

This is, of course, the famous statement known usually as 
Newton's third law, that "action and reaction are equal and 

We have already made extensive use of this result, tacitly 
or explicitly, earlier in this book, and in Chapter 4 we indicated 
the kind of experimental support that one can supply for it in 
static equilibrium situations. Newton, in developing the result 
for dynamic situations, with forces changing from instant to 
instant, made it quite clear that he regarded Eq. (9-9) as an in- 
ference from observattons. In the Principia he describes an 
experiment in which he floated a magnet and a piece of iron on 
water, and released them from rest. He noted that there was no 
motion of the combined mass after the magnetic attraction had 
pulled them together, and took this as a demonstration of what 
he himself called the third law of motion. His description of his 
pendulum collision cxperiments, also in the Principia, is couched 
in the same terms. 

Kaving introduced these forces of interaction, we can now 
relate them to the changes of momentum of the individual 

314 Collisions and conservation laws 

objects in a collision. Thus, if At is the duration of the collision 
and F 2 i is a constant force exerted by particle 2 on particle 1, 
the change of momentum Api of particle 1 in the collision is 
given by 

F21A/ = Api 

More generally, if any constant force F acts on a particle for 
some short time interval A/, the change of momentum that it 
generates is given by 

FA/ = Ap 

As we noted in Chapter 6, Newton's own approach to dynamics 
was rooted in this equation rather than in F = ma. We also 
introduced the terminology by which the product F At is called 
the impulse of the force in A/. If F is varying in magnitude and/or 
direction during the time span At, one can proceed to the limit 
of vanishingly small time and so obtain the following equation: 

(Newton's law reformulated) F = — (9-10) 


This eguation, written on the assumption that F is the net force 
acting on a particle, then becomes the basic statement of Newtonian 
dynamics. It is, in a sense, broader in scope than F = ma, or 
at least a more emcient statement of it. For example, a given 
force applied in turn to a number of different masses causes the 
same rate of change of momentum in each but not the same 
acceleration. In short, we come to recognize that momentum is 
a valuable single quantity to be accepted in its own right and 
most importantly for its property of being conserued in an isolated 
system of interacting particles. 

In our earlier discussion of the collision problem, we took 
the forces of interaction as being constant in time. In most cases 
that would be quite unrealistic. It is easy to see, however, that 
through the integration of Eq. (9-10) we obtain the net mo- 
mentum change caused by a varying force. Thus, for example, if 
a force has some arbitrary variation between / = and / = At, 
the momentum change that it generates is given by 

Ap = / Fdt (9-11) 


In a two-body collision, the duration of which is Ar, all that 
315 Action, rcaction. and impulse 

we actually observe is that the total momentum after the collision 
is equal to the total momentum before the collision. In terms 
of the impulses Api and Ap 2 given to the separate objects this 
result is expressed by the condition 

Api + Ap 2 = 

From this we infer that 

/ F 2 i dt = - / Pu 


In principle, Fi a and F 2 i could have quite unrelated values at 
any particular instant, as long as the above integrals are equal. 
However, failing any evidence to the contrary we assume that 
they are equal and opposite at each and every instant. Thus in 
a one-dimensional collision the graphs of these forces as a func- 
tion of time, whatever their exact form, are taken to be mirror 
images of each other as shown in Fig. 9-3. It is important to 
realize, however, that this is a postulate. And it is not always 
true! There is no difficulty as far as "contact" collisions between 
ordinary objects are concerned. But in situations in which objects 
influence one another at a distance, as for example through the 
long-range forces of electricity or gravitation, Newton's third 
law may cease to apply. For no interaction is transmitted in- 
stantaneously, and if the propagation time cannot be ignored in 
comparison with the time scale of the motion, the concept of 
instantaneous action and reaction can no longer be used. A 
simple mechanical model of such a delayed interaction is sug- 

Fig. 9-3 Corresponding variatioiis of 
action and reaction forces during the 
course of a collision. 






316 Collisions and conservation laws 

Fig. 9-4 Interaction wilh a time delay, mediated by 
particles trauersing the gap between two separated 

gested in Fig. 9-4. A cart, A, carries a gun that fires off a stream 
of bullets with speed V. At a distance L away there is a second 
cart, B, carrying a block in which the bullets are caught. Suppose 
that the bullets carry plenty of momentum, thanks to a large 
value of V, but are so Iight that they represent a negligible transfer 
of mass from the first cart to the second. Suppose further that 
they are invisible to an observer standing some distance away. 
(We might make them extremely small, or perhaps paint them 
black and set up a dark background.) Then if a brief burst of 
bullets is fired off from A, we see this cart begin to recoil, ap- 
parently spontaneously, whilc B remains at rest. Not until a 
time L/V later does B begin to recoil in the opposite direction. 
There is, in effect, a breakdown of the equality between action 
and reaction in such a case. By the time the whole interaction 
has been completed, with all the bullets reabsorbed in B, we 
recognize that momentum has ultimately been conserved, but if 
one restricts attention to the carts it does not appear to be con- 
served, instant by instant, during the interaction. 

The above example may seem artificial because, after all, 
we could save the action-reaction principle by looking more 
closely and observing the bullets at the instant of leaving A or 
striking B. Nevertheless, it offers an interesting parallel to what 
are probably the most important delayed interactions — those 
of electromagnetism. We know that the interaction between two 
separated charges takcs place via the electromagnetic field, and 
the propagation of such a field takes place at a speed which, 
although extremely large, is still finite— the speed of light. The 
transfer of momentum from one charge to another (resulting, 
let us say, from a sudden movement of the first charge) involves 
a time lag equal to the distance between them divided by c. If we 
looked at the charged particles alone, we would see a sudden 
change in the momentum of the first charge without an equal and 

317 Action, reaction. and impulse 

opposite change in the momentum of the other at the same time. l 
There would thus appear to bc a failure of momentum conserva- 
tion, instant by instant, unless we associate some momentum 
with the electromagnetic field that carries the interaction. And 
that is precisely what electromagnetic theory suggests. The 
picture becomes even more vivid when we introduce the quantiza- 
tion of the electromagnetic field and recognize that radiation is 
carried in the form of photons, or light quanta. By the time we 
have associated a momentum and an energy with each photon 
individually, we are remarkably close to our mechanical model. 
There is even a well-developed theoretical description of the 
static interaction between electric charges in terms of a continual 
exchange of so-called "virtual photons." In this case, however, 
since the forces are constant in time, the equality of action and 
reaction holds good at every instant, and the existence of a finite 
time for propagating the interaction ceases to be apparent. 


It is perhaps worth amplifying the remarks of the last section a 
little. We have seen how, in Newton's view, the law of conserva- 
tion of momentum is closely tied in with the action-reaction idea. 
There is, however, an alternative approach to simple collisions 
which loosens this connection and eases the transition to non- 
Newtonian mechanics. 

This approach can be defined in terms of a question : What 
do we actually observe in a collision experiment? The answer is 
that our observations are purely kinematic ones — measurements 
of the velocities of the two objects before and after impact. 
Suppose that two objects, A and B, with initial velocities n,, and 
u 2 , respectively, collide with one another and afterward have 
velocities Vj and v 2 - In any individual collision of this type, it is 
always possible to find a set of four scalar multiples (a) that 
permit one to write an equation of the following form: 

<*iui + a2U2 = «:»vi + a 4 \2 (9-12) 

'In circumstances where such elfects are important, the very concept of "the 
same time" — i.e., simultaneity — comes into question. It is just here that 
Newtonian mechanics itself ceases to be adequate and the revised formulation 
of dynamics according to special relativity becomes essential. 
2 This section may be omitled without destroying the continuity, but it is 
recommended if you want to see how the bases of classical mechanics can be 
approached in more than one way. 

318 Collisions and conservation laws 

This as it stands is a quite uninteresting statement. But experi- 
ments for all sorts of values of u x and u 2 reveal the remarkable 
result that in every such collision, for two given objects, we can 
obtain a vector identity by putting <*! = a 3 = a A (a scalar 
property of A) and a 2 = on = a B (a corresponding scalar prop- 
erty of B). In other words, the purely kinematic observations on 
a collision process permit us to introduce a unique dynamical 
property of each object. Notice that this simple situation ceases 
to hold if any of the velocities involved become comparable to 
that of light. In that case it is still possible to construct a vector 
balance equation in the form of Eq. (9-12), but only if the 
parameters a are made explicit functions of speed. In fact, we 
arrive at the relativistic formula for the variation of mass with 
speed [Eq. (6-3)]. • 

Let us return now to the results of experiments on collisions 
at low velocities. The basic statement of these results is that, in 
the impact of any two given objects, the velocity change of one 
always bears a constant, negative ratio to the velocity change of 
the other: 

V2 — u 2 = — const(vi — m) (9-13) 

It is precisely because this ratio of velocity changes is found to 
come out to the same value, whatever the type, strength, or 
duration of the interaction between the objects, that we can infer 
that it provides a measure of some intrinsic property of the 
objects themselves. We define this property as the inertial mass. 
One can set up an inertial mass scale for a number of objects 
1, 2, 3, ... by finding the velocity changes pairwise in such inter- 
action processes and defining the inertial mass ratio, let us say 
of objects 1 and 2, by 

m m |Av[i 

«II |Av|2 

Similarly for objects 1 and 3, 

rm _ |Av'|i 
m\ |Av'|.3 

and so on. If m t is the Standard kilogram, we then have an 
operation to determine the inertial masses of any other objects. 

'For further discussion, see the volume Special Relaliciry in this series. 

319 Exlending ihe principle of momentum conservation 

We must however, do more. If we let objects 2 and 3 interact, 
then the ratio 

m 3 _ |AT"| a 

m 2 |Av"| 3 

must be consistent with the same ratio obtained from the first 
two measurements. In fact it is, and this internal experimental 
consistency then allows us to use the values m 2 , m z , ... as mea- 
sures of the inertial masses of the respective objects. 

Having set up a consistent measure of inertial mass in this 
way, we can then rewrite Eq. (9-13) in the form 

v i ~ »i El (9-14) 

V2 — U2 mi 

which when rearranged gives us 

mim + wi2U2 - mm + »I2V2 (9-15) 

Thus an equation identical in appearance with the usual mo- 
mentum-conservation relation emerges, but notice how this con- 
trasts with the Newtonian analysis. We have used the collision 
processes themselves to define mass ratios through Eq. (9-13). 
Once this has been done, the terms in Eq. (9-15) automatically 
add up to the same total before and after the collision. 

What we have done here, in effect, is to give primacy of 
place to momentum conservation. The question as to whether or 
not action equals reaction does not arise. And this can be very 
valuable. For when one is confronted with non-Newtonian 
interactions (i.e., those for which action and reaction are not 
equal opposite forces at each instant) one faces the problem of 
how to incorporate them into physics— whether to abandon the 
law of momentum conservation in its limited form or to extend 
the idea of momentum and retain the conservation law. The 
momentum-conservation principle has proved so extremely 
powerful that the latter course has been chosen, and conservation 
of linear momentum is a central feature of relativistic dynamics. 

This way of analyzing the basic results of collision pro- 
cesses exposes the very intimate relation that exists between 
kinematics and dynamics. If we changc our description of space, 
time, and motion, then we can expect that our dynamics must be 
changed also. This is, in fact, precisely the situation as we make 
the transition from the kinematics of Galileo and Newton to the 
kinematics of Einstein's special theory of relativity. 

320 Collisions and conservation laws 


The impact of a stream of particles or fluid on a solid surface 
provides an instructive application of the laws of collision and 
the conservation of linear momentum. Suppose that a stream 
of particles, each having mass m and speed v, strikes a block of 
mass M [Fig. 9-5(a)] and that the particles all lodge in the block. 
Let the rate (i.e., number per second) at which particles pass 
through an imaginary fixed plane at right angles to the stream 
be denoted by R. 

We know that momentum must be conserved, although if the 
block were extremely massive one might, in watching the process, 
receive the impression that the momentum brought in by the 
particles was simply destroyed, because the velocity acquired is 
unnoticeably small. Suppose, for example, that the block is 
stationary when the first particle hits it. At the end of a short 
time At the number of particles that has arrived is RAt, each 
carrying momentum mv. If the stream were cut off at this instant, 
the block and the particles together would continue to move with 
some constant velocity u (we are assuming that the block is not 
restrained in any way as far as its horizontal motion is con- 
cerned). By conservation of linear momentum and mass we then 

RmvAt = (M + AM)u 

AM = Rm At 

Fig. 9-5 (o) Stream of individual particles striking a 
massive object. (b) Initial phase ofbuilding up to a 
constant average force produced by the particle stream. 

321 The forec cxerted by a stream of particles 

Letting At approach zero, we arrive at two equations that describe 
the acceleration and the rate of increase of mass of the block: 

d -§ - Rm - M (9-17) 


where we introduce the single symbol n to denote the mean rate 
of transport of mass in the beam. Clearly, if M is sufficiently 
large, the block will appear to remain at rest; its displacement 
and its increase of velocity can remain negligible for some time. 
But in any event, if the block is stationary at some instant, the 
force F exerted on it at that instant must be equal to M du/dt. 
Hence from Eq. (9-16) we have 

F =* M~r- Rme - po (9-18) 


Thus a strcam of particles striking a stationary surface 
exerts an average fo'rce on it given by Eq. (9-18). The word 
"average" should be emphasized. Our calculation treats the 
stream as truly continuous, in the sense that we let At — * in 
calculating F. But this is a purely mathematical step that does 
not correspond to the physical reality. The force is produced by 
the impact of individual discrete particles, and on a sufficiently 
short time scale we might be able to detect this. Figure 9-5(b) 
is an attempt to portray the hypothetical results of such observa- 
tions on the basis of the following very simple model. Suppose 
that each individual particle, upon striking the surface, undergoes 
a constant deceleration that brings it to rest in a time T. During 
this time it must be subjected to a force,/, given by 

S- T 

If the force exerted on the block as a result of the arrival of one 
particle were plotted as a function of time, it would then be a 
rectangle of height/and width T, as indicated by the small shaded 
area in Fig. 9-5(b). The force would suddenly come into existence 
at a certain instant and, a time T later, it would suddenly fail 
to zero. Suppose now that we consider what happens as a func- 
tion of time after the beam of particles is first turned on (e.g., by 

'The correctness of Eqs. (9-16) and (9-17) depends, in fact, on this condition. 
If the block has a speed u, the rate at which the particles strike it is reduced 
from R to R{\ — u/6), and the values of du/dt and dM/dt are reduced 
accordingly — see Problem 9-13. 

322 Collisions and conservation laws 

opening a shutter that was previously preventing them from 
reaching the block). Then as successive particles arrive, each 
adds its contribution / to the total force, which thus rises in an 
irregular stepwise fashion. However, at a time T after arrival 
of the first particle, the latter's contribution to the total force 
would vanish. Thereafter there would be no net increase in the 
total force, because on the average the earlier particles drop aut 
of the picture as fast as the new ones appear. The total force 
thus levels off at some value F but will exhibit statistical fluctua- 
tions about that mean value. The force will appear to be almost 
constant if the effects of the individual particles overlap con- 
siderably in time, as shown in the figure. This corresponds to 
making the average time interval between successive particles 
very short compared to the average time that it takes for an 
individual particle to be brought to rest. 

We can use the above microscopic picture to recalculate 
the total force F. It is equal to the force per particle,/, multiplied 
by the number of particles that are effective at any one instant. 
This number is equal to the total number of particles that arrive 
within one deceleration period, T. [Figure 9-5(b) should make 
this clear.] Since the rate of arrival is R, this number is just RT. 
Thus we can put 

F„ = {RT) f = RT™ 


F = Rmu 

as before. 

It is noteworthy that the average force the beam exerts 
against the plate (and hence also the average force the plate 
exerts against the beam of atoms) is quite independent of the 
actual magnitude of the deceleration that each atom undergoes. 
The average force is simply equal to the rate of change of mo- 
mentum of the beam. 

This force exerted by a stream of particles has been ex- 
ploited by W. Paul and G. Wessel to measure the average speed 
of a beam of silver atoms. ' A beam of atoms, evaporated from 
an "oven," was directed downward onto the pan of a very delicate 
balance. The force exerted on the balance pan was thus made 
up of two parts: a steady force, as given by Eq. (9-18), and a 

'W. Paul and G. Wessel, Z. Phys. 124, 691 (1948). 

323 The force exerted by a stream of particles 

Force on 
balance pan 

Fig. 9-6 Time dependence of 
a total force due t o the mo- 
mentum transfer and the 
tveight of a stream ofpar- 
ticles striking an object. 



Beamturned on 
at this instant 

force increasing linearly with time, due to the increasing mass as 
given by Eq. (9-17) (see Fig. 9-6): 

^total = V» + M' 

The forces involved were equivalent to the weight of a small 
number of micrograms. The experimental values for an oven 
temperature of 1363°K (= 1090°C) were approximately as 

tiv = 3.4 X 10- 7 N 
M = 5.6 X 10- ,0 kg/sec 

leading to a value for the average speed, v, of silver atoms at 

v «= 600 m/sec 


Just as the impact of a stream of particles on a surface produces 
a push, so the production of such a stream in the first place must 
cause a force of reaction on the system that gives the stream its 
momentum. In a normal jet of liquid or gas, the basic granularity 
of the stream is too fine to be noticed, and any device that sends 
out such a jet will experience a steady force of reaction, as given 
by Eq. (9-18). Thus if we imagine a bench test of a rocket engine, 
for example, with the engine clamped to a rigid structure, then 
the burnt fuel is thrown out backward with speed vq, as shown 
in Fig. 9-7(a), and the forward push, P, exerted on the rocket is 
given by 

324 Collisions and conservation laws 

Fig. 9-7 Sehemat ic diagrams o/a lest-bed arrange- 
ment of(a) a roeket englne and (b) a jet engine with air 
intake at the front. 

P = l*VO 

One sees this same principle at work on a smaller scale in garden 
sprinklers, fire hoses, and so on. 

A jet engine of an aireraft presents a somewhat more com- 
plicated application of these dynamical results. In this case the 
air that enters at the front of the engine, and leaves as part of the 
exhaust gases at the rear, plays an important role in the over-all 
process of momentum transfer. The main funetion of the fuel 
that is carried with the plane is to give the ejected gases a high 
speed with respect to the plane, and most of the moving mass is 
supplied by the air. It is very convenient to analyze the dynamics 
of this system from the standpoint of a reference frame in which 
the engine is instantaneously at rest. If the plane is traveling 
forward at a velocity v, the air is seen as entering the engine at 
the front with an equal and opposite velocity, as shown in 
Fig. 9-7(b). Then, at the rear, all the ejected material has a back- 
ward velocity v a in this frame. Thus, if air is being carried 
through the engine at the rate /x ftir (kg/sec) and fuel is being burnt 
at the rate /x fucI , the total rate of change of momentum defines a 
total forward foree on the engine according to the following 

P = Wuel»0 + H\t{O0 ~ ") 


Example. A jet aireraft is traveling at a speed of 250 m/sec. 
Each of its engines takes in 100 m 3 of air per second, correspond- 
ing to a mass of 50 kg of air per second at the plane's flying 
altitude. The air is used to burn 3 kg of fuel per second, and all 
the gases coming from the combustion chamber are ejected with 
a speed of 500 m/sec relative to the aireraft. What is the thrust 
of each engine? Substituting directly in Eq. (9-19) wc have 

325 Reaction from a fluid jet 

P = 3 X 500 + 50(500 - 250) 
= 1.4 X 10 4 N 

Four engincs of this type would thus give a total driving force 
of about 12,000 lb, a more or less realistic figure. 

The most spectacular manifestation of these reaction forces, 
at least in man-made systems, is of course the initial thrust from 
the rocket engincs in a launching at Cape Kennedy (Fig. 9-8). 

Fig. 9-8 Launching 
of a Saturn V rocket. 
(N.A.S.A. photo- 

326 Collisions and conscrvalion laws 

The following approximate figurcs are based on published data 1 
on the first stage of the Saturn V system: 

Rate of burning 15tons/sec = 1.4 X 10 4 kg/sec 

Total thrust 7.6 X 10 6 lb = 3.4 X 10 7 N 

Total mass at liftoff 3100 tons = 2.8 X 10 6 kg 

Burntime 2.5 min =150sec 

One can infer from thesc figures that the speed of the ejected 
gases is about 2500 m/sec and that the initial acceleration is 
about 2 m/sec 2 . (Remember that in a vcrtical liftoff one must 
first overcome the downward gravitational puli on the rocket!) 
By the end of the first-stagc burn, about 2250 tons of fuel have 
been consumed, and the total mass is down to only about a 
quarter of the initial value. The analysis of the accelerative 
process itself, as mass is continually lost, is the subject of the 
next section. 


This has bccome such a very large subject in recent years that 
it is clear that we shall do no morc than touch upon the under- 
lying dynamical principles. For anything like a substantial dis- 
cussion you should look elsewhere. 2 The fact remains, however, 
that the operation of any rocket does depend on the basic laws of 
conservation of momentum, as applied to a system made up of the 
rocket and its ejected fuel. For simplicity, let us consider the 
motion of a rocket out i n a region of space where the effects of 
gravity are sufficiently small to be ignored in the first approxima- 
tion. Under this assumption, the only force acting on the body 
of the rocket is the thrust from the ejected fuel. Suppose that the 
burnt fuel has a speed v n relative to the rocket. Between time t 
and time l + At, a mass Am of fuel is burnt and becomes sep- 
arated from the rocket. The situations before and after ejection 
are shown in Fig. 9-9, where m is the total mass of the rocket 
plus its remaining fuel at / + At, and o is its velocity at time t. 

■NASA Facts: Space Launch Vehicles. 

2 Scc, for cxamplc, M. Barrere et al., Rocket Propuhion, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 
1960; S. L. Bragg, Rocket Engines, Geo. Newnes, London, 1962; G. P. 
Sulton, Rocket Propuhion Elements, Wiley, New York, 1963. 

327 Rocket propulsion 



■i'» time i 


f/g. 9-9 Situalions jusi before and jusi after the ejec- 
tion of an element Am ofmass by a rocket. 

The ejection of the fuel is a kind of inelastic collision in 
reverse, since initially the masses m and Am have the same 
velocity. By conservation of linear momentum we have 

(w + Am)u = m(v + Av) + Am(v — vo) 

mo + u Am = mo + mAv + o Am — voAm 

mAv = voAm 

Ao = v — (9-20) 


This equation is not quite exact. (Why?) But as we let At ap- 
proach zero, the error approaches zero. As long as Au/t?o is 
much less than unity, Eq. (9-20) is an excellent approximation. 
Given the initial total mass w, of the rocket plus fuel, and the 
final mass w/ of the rocket at burnout, the velocity gained by the 
rocket can be evaluated. If the initial and final velocities of 
the rocket are i\ and v f , Eq. (9-20) tells us that 

V — Vi » »o 2 ~ Am 

The answer could be obtained numerically, by drawing a graph 
(Fig. 9-10) of l/m against m, and finding the area (shaded) 
between the limits m/ and m,. This is a pure number, which 
when multiplied by v gives the increase of velocity. Analytically, 
if m is used to denote the mass of the rocket (plus its remaining 
fuel) at any instant, it is more satisfactory to interpret dm as the 

328 Collisions and conservation lavvs 

Fig. 9-10 Craph of l/m versus m. The 
shaded area giues a relatlve measure of 
Ihe gain of velocity resulling from a 
given mass ehange. 

change of mass of the rocket in a time di. Defined in this way, 
dm is actually a negative quantity, which when integrated from 
the beginning to the end of the burning process gives the value 
of m; - rrii(< 0). In these terms the change of velocity can be 
written as the following integral in closed form: 


f dm . (m.\ 

— Vi = — 00 / — = Poin i — i 

J mi m \m f J 


You should satisfy yourself that this is indeed equivalent to the 
final result of the numerical-graphical method described above. 

Notice that the time does not enter into the calculation at 
all, although of course it would do so if we wanted to consider 
the rate of increase of v or the magnitude of the thrust. 

Notice also that we would be entitled, at each and every 
instant, to look at the situation from the frame of reference of 
the rocket itself. In this frame the velocity of the ejected fuel is 
always just — v , and Eq. (9-20) follows immediately. 

It is worth examining some of the implications of Eq. (9-21). 
The first thing to notice is that the gain of velocity is directly 
proportional to the speed of the ejected gases. Thus it pays to 
make v as great as possible. The highest values of v attainable 
through chemical burning processes are of the order of 
5000 m/sec, and in practice, because of incomplete burning and 
other losses, it is hard to do better than about 50% of the ideal 
theoretical value for a given fuel (cf. the figure of 2500 m/sec for 
the LOX-kerosene mixture of Saturn V, first stage). These 
velocities are, of course, very high in ordinary terms, but they are 
small compared to the velocities that can be given to charged 

329 Rocket propulsion 

particles by electrical acceleration. Hence the interest in develop- 
ing ion-gun engines, or even using the highest available speed 
(that of light) by making an exhaust jet of radiation. The trouble 
with both of these, however, is the very small rate of ejection of 
mass, which makes the attainable thrust very small. 

The other main feature of Eq. (9-21) is the way in which 
the increase of velocity varies logarithmically with the mass 
ratio. This places rapidly increasing demands on the amount of 
fuel needed to confer larger and larger final velocities on a given 
payload. Suppose, for example, that we wanted to attain a 
velocity equal to the exhaust velocity v , starting from rest. 
Then, by Eq. (9-21) we have 

v/ — V( = vo = foln 



»-. -2.718... 

But to attain twice this velocity, we need to have 

-fe) " 2 


Uli 2 - . 

— = e «7.4 

Table 9-1 presents the results of such calculations in more con- 
venient form. The last column represents the extra mass needed, 

TABLE 9-1 

v, - v t 



- m,)/m f 













as a multiple of the payload. The practical problems of producing 
very large mass ratios are prohibitive, but the use of multistage 
rockets (which also have other advantages) avoids this difficulty 
(see Problem 9-12, p. 359). 

330 Collisions and conservation laws 

A result that may seem surprising at first sight is that there 
is nothing, in principle, to prevent us from giving a rocket a 
forward velocity that is considerably greater than the speed v 
of the exhaust gases. Thus at a late stage in the motion one 
would see both the rocket and the ejected material moving for- 
ward with respect to the frame in which the rocket started out 
from rest. No violation of dynamical principles would be in- 
volved, and if one made a detailed accounting of the motion 
of all the material that was in the rocket initially, one would find 
that the total momentum of the system had remained at zero 
(as long as the effects of external forces, including gravity, could 
be ignored). It should of course be emphasized that our whole 
analysis would hold good, as it stands, only in the absence of 
gravity and of resistive forces due to the air. 


The seventeenth-century investigations of collision processes, by 
which momentum conservation was established, were chiefly 
experimental. But one of the men involved — Christian Huygens — 
applied the spirit of twentieth-century physics in a brilliant 
analysis of the particular case of two objects with perfect re- 
bound. He based his argument on symmetry and on the equiv- 
alence of frames related by a constant velocity. The analysis is 
simple but of great intrinsic interest. 

Figure 9-1 1 1 provides a suitably seventeenth-century back- 
ground to the situation. But though the picture may appear 
quaint and archaic, the thinking is sharp and fresh. Huygens 
imagines two equal elastic masses, colliding with equal and 
opposite speeds ±u. He assumes that they rebound so that each 
velocity is exactly reversed; this is a symmetry argument. Next, 
Huygens imagines a precisely similar collision to take place on a 
boat that is itself moving with speed v relative to the shore. This 
collision, viewed by a man on terra firma, appears as a stationary 
mass being struck by a mass with velocity 2v. After the impact, 

■From Ernst Mach, The Science of Mechanics, trans. T. J. McCormack, Open 
Court Publishing Co., La Salle, 111., 1960. The original figure comes from 
Huygens' Ireatise on impact (ca. 1700). Mach's book (which is extremely 
readable and uses a minimum of mathematics) is itself a landmark in the 
discussion of the fundamental principles of physics. His speculations on the 
origin of inertia were a significant part of the background to Einstein's think- 
ing about general relativity and cosmology (see Chapter 12). 

331 Collisions and frames of rcfcrcnce 

— m* m i u n i L 

Fig. 9-11 Huygens' 
visualization of a n 
elaslic collision be- 
tween two equal 
masses, as shown 'm 
his book, De Motu 
Corporum ex Per- 
cussione (1703). 
(Reprinled in Vol. 16 
ofC. Huygens, 
Oeuvres Completes, 
Marlinus Nijhoff, The 
Hague, Netherlands, 




the first mass has acquired the velocity 2v, and the second mass 
is stationary. 

More generally, if the boat has a speed u, different from v, 
the velocities exchange as follows: 

Body 1 Body 2 

Before impact: u + v u — d 

Afler impact: u — o u + v 

Thus Huygens predicts, on theoretical grounds, the results of all 
possible one-dimensional experiments on the perfectly elastic 
collision of two identical masses. The feature common to all 
of them is that the magnitude of the relative velocity has the 
same value after the collision as it had before the collision. 

Huygens went even further. Again using a kind of symmetry 
argument, he deduced a general property of perfectly elastic 
collisions between unegual masses. If a moving object A strikes 
an unequal stationary object B, then after the collision they will 
be moving with velocities v and w as indicated in Fig. 9-12(a). 
Imagine that this is viewed from a boat moving to the right with 
velocity w/2. Then before collision the object B is seen moving 
to the left, with velocity — w/2, as shown in Fig. 9-12(b). Huygens 
argues that the exact reversal of the motion of B, as seen from 
this second frame, must also imply the exact reversal of the motion 
of A in this perfectly elastic process. Thus the final velocity of A 
must be — (m — w/2) i n this frame. But this velocity is also 
equal to v — w/2, because the final velocity of A as seen from 

332 Collisions and conservation laws 

Fig.9-12 Elastic 
collision between two 
unequal objects as 
seen (d) from the 
laboratory frame, and 
{b) from a frame in 
which both celocities 
are simply reversed. 



Seen from 
the shore 

Seen from 
the boat 












or: v - -x 




the shore is v. Hence we have 

- (u - w/2) = v - w/2 
w — v = u 


Thus Huygens concludes that in the elastic collision of any two 
objects whatsoever, the magnitude of the relatioe velocity remains 
unaltered. Notice, however, that something beyond the con- 
servation of linear momentum is involved here. The extra some- 
thing is what we have learned to call kinetic energy, and its 
conservation defines a very special class of collisions. Let us 
consider this further. 


Suppose that a one-dimensional collision takes place as shown 
in Fig. 9-1 3(a). If this system is effectively free of external in- 
fluences we have conservation of linear momentum: 

m\U\. + W2«2 = WlJ-'l + »12 1-" 2 

Suppose further that the collision is perfectly elastic, in the sense 
defined by Eq. (9-22). In the present problem this implies the 
following relationship: 

Ml — M2 = t>2 — Di 

We can solve these two equations for the final velocities, v y and 
v 2 . The results are 

»11 — »12 , 2»I2 

"i = — — r— "i + r - — «2 

1$ = 

»11 + »»2 

»11 + IW2 

«I - 

»11 + »12 

mi — mi 

»n + »12 


333 Kinetic energy in collisions 

Using these values of Vi and v 2 , it is a straightforward piece of 
algebra to arrive at the following result: 

mivi 2 + W2^2 2 = miui 2 + /W2W2 2 (9-23) 

You will recognize that this equation, apart from the absence of 
factors of \ throughout, corresponds to a statement that the 
total kinetic energy after the collision is equal to the kinetic 
energy initially. We have arrived at this result on the basis of 
symmetry considerations and without any explicit mention 
of forces or work. We shall bring these latter concepts into the 
picture in Chapter 10, but for the moment we do not need them. 
Some of the early workers in mcchanics recognized the con- 
servation property represented by Eq. (9-23) for perfectly elastic 
collisions, and referred to the quantity mv 2 as the "living force" 
(Latin, vis vioa) of a moving object. 

Having, in effect, introduced kinetic energy into the de- 
scription of collision processes, we shall now develop an impor- 
tant result that holds good whether or not the total kinetic energy 
is conserved. Suppose that Fig. 9-13(a) represents an arbitrary 
one-dimensional collision as observed in a reference frame S. 
Let us consider this same collision from the standpoint of another 
frame S' that has the velocity v with respect to S. (In other 
words, 5 and S' are related by the Galilean transformations.) 
We then have 

u\ = «i — V U2 = U2 — v 

v\ = Pl — B PJ = V2 — o 

We shall now show that the change of kinetic energy between 
initial and final states is an invariant — i. e., it has the same value 
in both frames. 

In S: 

^initial = h m > u l 2 + 4"»2«2 2 = i'Wlfl 2 + £'M2U2 2 

AK =K,- Ki = (imim 2 + im 2 (.-2 2 ) 

- (^wiwi 2 + Jm2«2 2 ) 

In S': 

■^'initial = i«l(Ml - V) 2 + \tm(M2 •- V) 2 
^'final = i«l(d - V) 2 + im 2 (V2 - v) 2 

AK' = (%mivi 2 + fffttoa 2 ) — (2"»i«i 2 + i"J2«2 2 ) 

- VftmiVl + W2f2> — (miUi + 7M2«2)] 

334 Collisions and conservation laws 

Fig. 9-13 Arbilrary 
one-dimensional col- 
lision as seen in two 
different f rames 
related by a velocity v. 

(a) InS: 


ms'-. fW o*r 0*r 

By momentum conservation, for a«;> kind of collision, the com- 
bination of terms in squarc brackets in AK' is zero. It follows that 

AK' = AK 

Thus, if the change of kinetic energy for a given collision process 
is specified in one frame, it has the same value in all frames. 
Given a knowledge of this quantity, and the fact of momentum 
conservation, we can predict the values of u, and v> in any one- 
dimensional collision process for which the initial velocities w i 
and u> are specified. The value of AK may be positive, negative, 
or zero. The first of these corresponds to an explosive process, 
in which extra kinetic energy is given to the separating particles 
as a result of the interaction. The second and third possibilities 
correspond to inelastic and elastic collisions, respectively, in the 
sense in which we have already been using these terms. 


The momentum of a particle or of a system of particles is not 
an invariant; it depends on the frame of reference in which one 
observes the motion. If, however, one compares the descriptions 
of the motion in two different inertial frames, related by a con- 
stant velocity, the difference between the measured values of the 
momentum of a particle is always a constant vector of magnitude 
m\, where m is the mass of the particle and v is the velocity of one 
frame relative to the other. One can always find a reference 
frame in which the total momentum of any particle vanishes; it 
is evidently a frame in which the particle is at rest at the instant 
of time one determines its momentum. One can likewise find a 
reference frame in which the total momentum of any system of 
particles is zero, and this zero-momentum frame of reference is of 
great importance, not only as a convenience for looking at col- 
lisions and interaetions in general but also, as we shall show 

335 The zero-momentum frame 

Fig. 9-14 Basis of 
defining the zero- 
momenlum {center-of- 
mass) reference frame. 

shortly, for its dynamical implications. To see how we identify 
this zero-momentum framc, let us start with a simple example; 
two particles /n, and m 2 move along the x axis with constant 
velocities t>i and v% in a frame of reference S (Fig. 9-14). Our 
task is to find the velocity D of a reference frame S' relative to S 
such that in S' the total momentum m\v\ + m-iv'i ' s ec l ua ' to 

Let O' be the origin of S' moving with velocity v relative to 
O. From Fig. 9-14 we see that the velocities of tn^ and m 2 
relative to O are given by 

v\ = c\ — v 
v'2 = 02 — u 

Hence the momentum of the two particles in S' is 

miv'i + /M2C2 = miL-i — rrtiU + /W202 — mzv 
and if this is to be zero, we must have 

(/Ml + m2)v = /Hl»l + OT2l>2 (9-24) 

Equation (9-24) fixes the velocity of the reference frame S' 
relative to S but leaves the choice of the position (x) of O' arbi- 
trary. We use this freedom to choose the location of O' relative 
to the positions of m, and m 2 as simply as possible. If werewrite 
Eq. (9-24) in the equivalent form 

or better as 

— [(mi + m 2 )x] = — [mixi + m 2 X2] 
dt di 

evidently the simplest way of satisfying this is to equate the two 

336 Collisions and conscrvalion laws 


Fig. 9-15 Basis ofdefining the cenler of granit y, not 
necessarily identical tvilli tJte center ofmass. 

sets of square brackets. The difference between them must be a 
m *t constant and we choose the constant equal to zero. We then have 
for the position of O' in S, 

_ = misi + m 2 x 2 (9 _ 25) 

mi + m 2 

The origin of a zero-momentum reference frame chosen in 
this way is called the center of mass of the two-particle system 
made up of W] and m 2 . You will recognize that Eq. (9-25) also 
defines what we are accustomed to calling the center of gravity 
of two objects (cf. Fig. 9-15). In principle, however, these need 
not be identical points. The center of gravity is literally the point 
through which a single force, equal to the sum of the gravitational 
forces on the separate objects, effectively acts. If the values of g 
at the positions of the two objects were not quite identical, then 
the forces F gi and F g2 would not be strictly proportional to m! 
and m 2 , in which case the center of gravity and the center of 
mass would not quite coincide. The difference is negligible for 
ordinary purposes, but it should be recognized that the center of 
mass, as given by Eq. (9-25), is defined without reference to the 
uniformity or even the existence of gravitational forces. Perhaps 
you recognized that we have already used the zero-momentum 
frame in our earlier section on collisions and frames of reference. 
When Huygens wanted to apply symmetry arguments to col- 
lisions, this was the frame he started with. But now we have 
identified it in a much more explicit fashion. 

The introduction of the zero-momentum or center-of-mass 
(CM) frame leads to a very important and immensely useful way 
of analyzing the dynamics of a system of particles. To develop 
the essential idea in the simplest possible way we shall again 
consider a one-dimensional system of two particles. In frame S 
(let us suppose that this is the frame defined by our laboratory) 
the particles have velocities Vi and v 2 . In the zero-momentum 
frame (S') they have velocities v[ and v' 2 given by 

l/l = D] — v 

V 2 = V 2 — C 

where 15 is defined by Eq. (9-24). Putting m\ + tn% = M, we 
can put 

337 The zero-momentum frame 

» - ^±^ = £ (9-26) 

where P is the total linear momentum, which remains unchanged 
in any collision proccss: 

P = ntyvi + HtaD2 = const. (9-27) 

We now proceed to express thc total kinetic energy K, as mea- 
sured in the laboratory frame, in terms of the center-of-mass 
velocity v and the velocities v[ and v 2 of mi and m 2 relative to 
the CM. We have 

K = ImM + df + im 2 (o' 2 + vf 

= (£wiid'i 2 + JTJttPa ) + (miv'i + m 2 v' 2 )o 

+ Kmi + w 2 )0 2 (9-28) 

Now, by the very definition of the zero-momentum frame, we 

miv'i + miv'y = 

Hence the middle term on the right-hand side of Eq. (9-28) is 
automatically zero! The first term we recognize as the total 
kinetic energy K' of the two individual particles relative to the 
CM; the last term is equal to thc kinetic energy of a single particle 
of mass M moving with the velocity i; of the CM. Thus we can 

K = K' + \Ml n - (9-29) 

This is such an important result that we shall express it in words 

The kinetic energy of a system of two particles is equal to the 
kinetic energy of motion relative to the center of mass of the system 
(the internal kinetic energy), plus the kinetic energy of a single 
particle of mass equal to the total mass of the system moving with 
the center of mass. 

The great importance of this separation of the kinetic energy 
into two parts — and note well that it works only if the new 
reference frame is the zero-momentum frame — is that it opens 
the way to a very powerful and simplifying procedure. We have 
the possibility of analyzing the internal motion of a system {relative 
to the CM) without reference to the bodily motion of the system 
as a whole. (We shall show shortly that the result holds good not 
only for one-dimensional motions, but in general.) 

338 Collisions and conscrvnlion laws 

One of the implications of Eq. (9-29) is that a certain amount 
of kinetic energy is locked up, as it were, in the motion of the 
center of mass. In the absence of external forces the velocity v 
remains constant throughout the course of a collision process, 
and the kinetic energy %Md 2 must Iikewise remain unchanged. 
This means that in the collision of two objects, only a certain 
fraction of their total kinetic energy, as measured in the labora- 
tory, is available for conversion to other purposes. The amount 
of this available kinetic energy is, in fact, identical with K'. We 
can calculate it with the help of Eq. (9-29): 

K' = K- $Mo 2 

= (imivi + \m2v2) — \{m\ + /»2)0 

Substituting for d from Eq. (9-20), this leads by simple algebra 
to the following result: 

K' = \ -22?- (c 2 - Bl f (9-30a) 

2 mi + rri2 

The value of K', as expressed by this equation, is thus the kinetic 
energy of what can be regarded as being effectively a single mass, 
of magnitude m l m 2 /(m l + m 2 ), moving at a velocity equal to 
the relative velocity of the colliding particles. The effective mass 
is called the reducedmass of the system and is given the symbol y.. 
Thus we may write Eq. (9-30a) in the more compact form 


K' = K, 



u = 

mi + ni2 

Prel = 02 — 1>1 = 02 - 


For example, if a moving object of mass 2 units strikes a station- 
ary object of mass 1 unit, two thirds of the initial kinetic energy 
is locked up in center-of-mass motion, and only one third is 
available for the purpose of producing deformations, and so on, 
when the objects collide. 


In general the velocity vectors of two colliding objects define a 
plane, and it is therefore important to extend our analysis of 
collision processes into two-dimensional space. Actually one 

339 Collision processes in two dimcnsions 

Fig. 9-16 (a) Collision 
seen as occurring in 
one dimension. (b) As I 
seen in another refer- I 
ence frame, the colli- I 
sion appears two- 


+.w ■ 


must stand ready to go all the way into three dimensions, because 
the plane defined by the velocity veetors of two partieles after 
a collision may not be the same as that defined by the initial 
velocities. Many collision processes are, however, purely two- 
dimensional, and for simplicity we shall limit ourselves to such 
cases in diseussing specific examples, even though the theory 
applies equally well to three-dimensional problems. 

One thing that is worth recognizing at the outset is that 
the analysis of purely one-dimensional problems, of the type we 
have diseussed so far, can in faet lead to predietions about 
certain types of two-dimensional collisions, because we can turn 
a one-dimensional collision into a two-dimensional one by 
simply changing our point of view. Consider, for example, an 
imperfectly elastic collision between two identical spheres that 
approach one another along the y axis with equal and opposite 
velocities, ±u [see Fig. 9-16(a)]. Suppose that as a result of this 
collision they recoil back along the y axis with reduced velocities 
±o (symmetry requires that these final velocities be equal and 
opposite). Figure 9-16(b) then shows how the same collision 
would appear to an observer who had a velocity — w parallel to 
the x axis. This defines a whole class of oblique collision prob- 
lems, all of which can be solved with reference to the simple 
head-on collision of Fig. 9-16(a). One can go even further yet, 
by viewing the collision of Fig. 9-16(b) from a reference frame 
that has some velocity parallel to the y direetion. This removes 
all the apparent symmetry, yct it is basically the same collision. 
All the collisions for which, at the moment of impaet, the two 
spheres have a relative velocity ofgiven magnitude along the line 
joining their centers are dynamically equivalent. 

340 Collisions and conservation laws 

This suggests a vcry important way of simplifying the 
analysis of collision problems. Imagine yourself in the frame in 
which the collision is most simply described; this will be the 
center-of-mass frame, in which by definition the colliding par- 
ticles approach one another along a straight line with equal and 
opposite momenta. Solve the problem in this CM frame, and 
transfer the result to the laboratory frame by means of a Galilean 

The grcat simplicity of a collision process as viewed in the 
zero-momentum frame is illustrated in Fig. 9-17. Since the 
total momentum in this frame is zero, the particles separate, as 
well as approach, with equal and opposite momenta, as shown in 
Fig. 9-17(a). Also the magnitudes of the final momentum vectors 
are independent of their direction in the CM frame. Thus, as 
shown in Fig. 9-17(b), the vectors p[/ and p' 2 / can be represented 
with their tips lying at opposite ends of the diameter of a circle. 

The relative directions of p{,- and p[/ can be anything, de- 
pending on the details of the interaction. The relative lengths 
of these vectors also depend, of course, on the detailed mechanism. 
In a perfectly elastic collision we have p) = p'i. In a completely 
inelastic collision we have p' f = 0. (In an cxplosive process, for 
example rocket propulsion, we have the converse situation, where 
p'i = 0, p} > 0.) And in atomic, chemical or nuclear reaction 
processes we may find p} less than, equal to, or greater than p\. 
To begin with, let us look at one or two examples of perfectly 
elastic collisions so as to appreciate the beauties of a view from 
the center-of-mass frame. We are defining an elastic collision 

Fig. 9-17 (a) An ar- 
bilrary collision as 
described by equal and 
opposite momentum 
vectors in the CM 
frame. (b) In the CM 
frame, the end poinls 
of the momentum 
vectors lie on circles. 

341 Collision processes in two climcnsions 

here as one in which the magnitude of the relative velocity is 
unchanged by the collision. As we have seen, this is equivalent 
to saying that the total kinetic energy, as well as the momentum, 
is conserved. The definition in terms of kinetic energy conserva- 
tion will later become the dominant one. 


The nuclear physicist livcs in two worlds. One is his laboratory, 
the other is the center-of-mass frame of the particles whose 
collisions and interactions he is studying. By learning to skip 
nimbly from one frame to the other he gets the best of both 
worlds. Let us see how. 

Proton-proton collisions 

Figure 9-18 shows a collision between two protons, as recorded 
in a photographic emulsion. One of the protons belonged to a 
hydrogen atom in the emulsion and was effectively stationary 
before the collision took place; the other entered the emulsion 
with a kinetic energy of about 5 MeV. 

The most notable feature of the collision is that the paths 
of the two protons after collision make an angle of 90° with each 



/ . 

Fig. 9-18 Elastic 
collision between an 
incident proton and an 
initially stationary 
proton in a photo- 
graphic emulsion. 
{From C. F. Powell 
and G.P.S. Occhia- 
lini, Nuclear Physics 
in Photographs, Ox- 
ford Unicersity Press, 
New York, 1947.) 


. ~ «.„.. -%.,..; «...^... 


342 Collisions and conservation laws 

othcr. This is true for all such proton-proton collisions, until 
we get up to energies so high that Newtonian mechanics is no 
longer adequate to describe the situation. By first looking into 
the center-of-mass frame we can readily understand this. Let 
the velocity of the incident proton as observed in the laboratory 
be v. Then the zero-momentum frame has velocity v/2, and in 
this frame the protons approach and recede with equal and 
opposite velocities as shown in Fig. 9-19(a). Suppose one proton 
emerges from the collision in the direction d', so that the other 
is at ir — B' on the other side of the line of approach. To get 
back to the laboratory frame we add the velocity v/2 to each 
proton, parallel to the original line of motion, as shown in 
Fig. 9-I9(b). But the triangles ABC and A EF are both isosceles, 
so the directions 0i and 8 2 of the protons as observed in the 
laboratory are given by 

$i = 6' /2 

02 = (ir - 6')/2 


0i + 6 2 = r/2 

Moreover, we can easily find the laboratory velocities of the two 
protons after the collision, for we have 

ui = 2(y/2)cos0i = ucosfli 
v 2 = 2(u/2)cos0 2 = wsinfli 

Fig. 9-19 (a) Elastic 
collision between two 
eaual masses, as seen 
in the CM frame. 
(b) Transformation to 
the laboratory frame, 
showing a 90° angle 
between the final 

343 Elastic nuclear collisions 

We see that in any such collision the total kinetic energy is con- 
served, because 

Initial KE = \mv 2 

Final KE = £m(t>cosfli) 2 + \m(o cos 2 ) 2 

= £/wt; 2 (cos 2 6i + sin 2 0,) 

= %mv 2 

Figure 9-20 shows a similar collision between equal macroscopic 
objects (billiard balls); it is not perfectly elastic, but it is impres- 
sively close. 

Neutron-nucleus collisions 

In nuclear fission processes, neutrons are ejected with a variety 
of energies, but the average energy is of the order of 1 MeV. 

Fig. 9-20 Slroboscopic pholograph of an almost perfectly elastic 
collision between equal masses. (Front PSSC Physics, D. C. 
Heath, Lexington, Massachusetts, 1965.) 

344 Collisions and conscrvation laws 

These neutrons are however, most effective in causing further 
fissions if they are reduced to energies of the order of 10~ 2 or 
10 -1 eV (thermal energies). Thus an essential feature of every 
slow-neutron reactor is a means of slowing down the neutrons. 
And elastic collisions of neutrons with other nuclei (those com- 
posing the moderator material of the reactor) do most of the job. 
Suppose that a neutron of mass m makes an elastic collision 
with a nucleus of mass M. Let the initial velocity of the neutron 
in the laboratory be v ; in this frame the struck nucleus will be 
assumed stationary. Figure 9-21 (a) shows the collision as seen 
in the center-of-mass frame, which has a velocity v relative to 
the laboratory frame given by Eq. (9-24): 

M + m 



If the collision turns the neutron through an angle d' in the zero- 
momentum frame, its final velocity in the laboratory frame is the 
vector v shown in Fig. 9-21 (b). The magnitudes of the final 
velocities, as measured in the laboratory, for any given value 
of d', are readily calculated. (Exercise: Do this calculation for 
yourself, and verify that in this case, as with two equal masses, 
the total kinetic energy, as measured in the laboratory, remains 
unchanged as a result of the collision.) 

The biggest energy loss for a neutron as seen i n the lab- 
oratory frame occurs if it is scattered straight backward (d' = x). 
In this case we have 

i;(t) = D - (v - B) = -(to - 2v) 

Fig. 9-21 {a) Elastic 
collision between two 
uneaual masses, as 
seen in the CM frame. 
(b) Transformation to 
the laboratory frame; 
the angle between the 
velocities is different 
from 90°. 

345 Elastic nuclear collisions 


M - m 

For e' = the neutron loses no energy at all. (What sort of a 
collision is this?) Thus the kinetic energy of the neutron after 
the collision lies between the following limits: 

K mtiX = ^mvo 

Since K max is independent of the mass M of a moderator nucleus, 
it is the expression for K mKn that tells us what value of M is most 
likely to lead to the greatest reduction of the average neutron 
energy. And we see that M = m makes K min equal to zero; we 
cannot do as well as this for any other value of M, whether it be 
bigger or smaller than m. Thus if no other considerations were 
involved, ordinary hydrogen would make the best moderator, 
since in this case M (the proton mass) is equal to m within about 
1 part in 10 3 . Protons, however, also capture slow neutrons 
rather effectively, thereby making them unavailable for causing 
further fissions, and it turns out that certain other light nuclei 
(e.g., deuterium, beryllium, and carbon) offer a better com- 
promise between moderating and trapping of the fission neutrons. 


We shall turn now to processes in which there may be a net 
loss or gain of kinetic energy as a result of the collision. In 
analyzing such processes, it is important to confirm that the 
change of total kinetic energy is indeed an invariant quantity, 
and that the result we obtained on the basis of a one-dimensional 
collision does hold good in general. In order to show this, we 
first redevelop Eq. (9-29) for two particles moving in arbitrary 
directions. Let the particles have masses m , and m 2 and velocities 
vj and v 2 in the laboratory frame (5). Then the velocity, v, of the 
CM frame (S') is defined by the equation 

_ = wiivi + >"2V2 (9-33) 

mi + mz 

If the velocities of the particles as measured in 5' are v[ and v' 2 , 
346 Collisions and conservation laws 

we then have 

Vl = v 'i + v 
v 2 = v' 2 + v 

We now write down the total kinetic energy in S, using the fact 
that the kinetic energy $mv 2 of a particle can also be expressed 
as Jm(v • y), i.e., in terms of the scalar product of the vector v 
with itself. Thus we have 

K = £mi(vi • vi) + £m 2 (v 2 • v 2 ) 

= }«i(Ti + v) • (v| + v) + $m 2 (v' 2 + v) ■ (v 2 + v) 

Now consider one of these scalar products, using the distributive 
and commutative laws that apply to the dot products of vectors: 

(v'i + v) • (v', + v) = v', ■ vi + 2v'i ■ v + v • v 
= v? + 2v', • v + v 2 

Using this result and its counterpart in the second term of the 
above expression for K, we have 

K = (Jmii/i 8 + im 2 02) + (miT 7 , + m 2 v 2 ) • v + i(m, + m 2 )D 2 

But again we note that, by the definition of the zero-momentum 
frame, the second term on the right is zero, so that we come back 
to the simple result of Eq. (9-29): 

K = K' + £A/B 2 

Applying this to the states of a two-particle system before and 
after collision, we have 

Ki = K'i + iMV 2 
K, = K} + %Md 2 

We assume that the total mass remains unchanged and, in the 
absence of external forces, so does D. Thus we again arrive at 
the result 

K/ - Ki = K} - Ki- Q 

where Q is the amount by which the final kinetic energy exceeds 
(algebraically) the initial kinetic energy. The actual value of Q 
may, of course, be negative. 

The results of the above analysis can be extended, with 
virtually no modification, to such processes as nuclear reactions, 

347 Inelastic and explosive processes 

in which the actual identity of the particies in the final state may 
be quite different from what one has at the beginning. Suppose, 
for example, that there is a collision between two nuclei, of masses 
m 1 and m 2 , which react to produce two different nuclei, of 
masses m 3 and m 4 . Then we can write the following statements 
of conservation : 

Mass: my + /W2 ■» ms + »14 = M 

Momentum: /wivi + W2V2 = W3V3 + mi\4 = Mv 
wiv'i + »i2V2 = W3V3 + mnv'n = 

Thus the initial and final kinetic energies can be written as 

Ki = im^f + \m 2 {o' 2 f + £MD 2 
K f = ImM? + kmiMf + \Mo 2 

with K f - Ki = Q. 

Example: The D — D reaction. One of the most famous 
nuclear reactions (and an important one for the process 
of energy generation by nuclear fusion) is the reaction of two 
nuclei of deuterium (hydrogen 2) to form a helium 3 nucleus and 
a neutron ' : 

?H + ?H -» 2He + i/i + 3.27 MeV 

The 3.27 MeV represents the extra amount of kinetic energy, Q, 
made available because the masses of the product particies (their 
rest masses, to be precise) add up to a little less than the masses 
of the initial particies; the total energy, including mass equiv- 
alents, remains constant, of course. 

Suppose now that a deuteron with a kinetic energy of 1 MeV 
strikes a stationary deuteron. What is the final state of affairs 
as viewed in the CM frame? (See Fig. 9-22.) First, let us cal- 
culate the velocity D. The mass of a deuteron is about 2 amu, or 
about3.34 X 10" 27 kg. Now, 1 MeV = 1.6 X KT 13 J. There- 

D , - (HiJ e 1.0 X 10 7 m/sec 

'In this equation, the subscript before the letter for a given nucleus denotes 
the number of protons and the superscript shows the total number of nucleons. 
D and ?H both stand for a deuteron. 

348 Collisions and conservation laws 





Fig. 9-22 (o) Reac- 
tion process, in which 
the collision ofthe 
particles m i and m 2 
leads to the formation 
oftwo different par- 
ticles, m z and m,. 
(6) Same process as 
seen in the CMframe. 





In Laboratory frame In CM frame 

(a) (b) 

Since m 2 = ffli and m 2 is initially at rest, we have 

D = d i/2 = 0.5 X 10 7 m/sec 

In the CM frame the deuterons have equal and opposite velocities 
of magnitude equal to C. Hence we have 

Kinitial = 2 X %miC 2 = £/HU>l 2 


Kfnitiai = hKx = 0.5 MeV 

[We see here a particular application of Eq. (9-30). If a moving 
object collides with a stationary one of equal mass, only half the 
initial kinetic energy is available for their relative motion in the 
CM frame.] 

Now consider the result of the nuclear reaction. The final 
total kinetic energy i n the CM frame is given by 

Kfinal = Kinitiol + 3.27 McV 

= 3.77 MeV = 6.03 X 10" ,3 J 

This is partitioned between the 3 He and the neutron in such a 
way that the momenta are numerically equal. Denoting the 
masses and velocities ofthe 3 He and the neutron as m 3 and v' 3 and 
m 4 and V4, respectively, we have 

»»3v'j + W4V4 = 

«a ,./ 


349 Inelastic and cxplosivc processes 


= |m 3 (,'3) 2 + ^(^)W 

1 W3( ffl3 + W I4) , , ,.2 

= 2 ^ «> 

Putting m 3 « 3 amu and m 4 « 1 amu, this gives us 

and so U4 (= 3»!) « 2.3 X 10 7 m/sec. 

We thus have a full picture of the final situation as viewed 
in the CM frame for any specified direction 9± of the outgoing 
neutron. To go back to the laboratory frame we have simply to 
add the CM velocity v to each of the vectors V3 and v 4 . 

The great advantage of using the CM frame in this way is 
that, regardless of the final directions as specified by 4 , the 
magnitudes of V3 and v^ always have the same values, whereas in 
the laboratory frame v 3 (and also v 4 ) has a different magnitude 
for each direction. This does not mean, however, that it is always 
desirable or necessary to go into the CM frame. For example, one 
may wish to answer the question: What is the speed of a neutron 
emitted at some given direction 4 in the laboratory with respect 
to the initial direction of a deuteron beam? In such a case it is 
easiest to work directly from the equations for energies and 
momenta as measured in the laboratory: 

ft + Q = * 8 + K< (934) 

Pl = P3 + P4 

(In the first equation Q represents the amount by which AT flnal 
differs from Alitlah so that in the example we have just con- 
sidered we have Q = +3.27 MeV. Q may be positive, negative, 
or zero; the last of these represents an elastic collision.) 

Note that Eq. (9-34) represents three independent equations 
(one for kinetic energy, and two for momentum — treating this as 
a two-dimensional problem). I n the final state there are four 
unknowns: a magnitude and a direction for each of the vectors 
v 3 and v 4 . The situation is indeterminate unless we put in one 
more piece of information, as for example the direction of one of 
the particles. Q is here taken to be a known quantity (as are K x 

350 Collisions and conservation laws 

and p O, but one could deduce it from a complete set of measure- 
ments of v 3 and V4. 


We are so used to associating the word "collision" with some 
abrupt, violent event that it may be well to point out that the 
results we have developed can be applied to other, quite gentle 
interactions. The only essential features are these: 

1. That the interaction is confined, for all practical purposes, 
within some limited interval of time, so that it can be said to have 
a beginning and an end. 

2. That over the duration of the collision, the effect of any 
external forces can be ignored, so that the system behaves as 
though it were isolated. 

Figure 9-23 shows stroboscopic photographs of a collision 
between two frictionless pucks carrying permanent magnets, 
mounted vertically so as to repel each other. There is no contact 
in the usual sense, but this is certainly a collision within the 

Fig. 9-23 (a) A "soft" collision, with no contact in the 
ordinary sense, occurring between two objects (2:1 mass 
ratio) carrying permanent magnets. (b) The identical 
collision photographed by a camera moving with the 
center ofmass of the two objects. (From the PSSC 
film, "Moving with the Center of Mass", by Herman R. 
Branson, Education Development Center Film Sudio, 
Newton, Mass., 1965.) 



351 Whal is a collision? 

physicist's meaning of the term. One can see that the velocities are 
effectively constant in magnitude and direction except over the 
limited region of close approach of the objects. 


Having discussed the conservation of linear momentum, and the 
general relation of force to rate of change of momentum, we can 
now consider the motion of a system of interacting particles that 
are not free of external influence. This is, of course, a very im- 
portant extension of our ideas, because in practice a system is 
never completely isolated from its surroundings. 

It will suffice to look at a two-particle system. The ex- 
tension to any number of particles is quite simple but will be 
deferred to Chapter 14. Let m, and m 2 be the masses of the two 
particles, Fi and F 2 the external forces acting on them, and f 2 i 
and f 12 the internal interaction forces — f 2 i the force exerted on 
particle 1 by particle 2, and f i2 the force exerted on particle 2 
by particle I. 

Newton's law of motion applied to the particles individually 
states that 

Fi + f21 = /wi -7- 

m (9-35) 

t/v 2 

F 2 + fi2 = nt2 —7- 

If the interaetions are Newtonian, and we shall consider this the 
case, then the third law of Newton requires that 

fl2 + f21 = 
Adding the two equations (vectorially), we then get 

Fi + F 2 = mi — + m 2 -j- 


Fi + F 2 = -- (mi vi + /n 2 v 2 ) (9-36) 


in which the internal forces f 1 2 and f 2 1 have disappeared. This 
equation states that the resultant of all the external forces acting 
on the system equals the rate of change of the total veetor mo- 
mentum of the system. 

352 Collisions and conservation laws 

We can express this result in another, very compact way by 
introducing the concept of the center of mass of the system. If 
the individual positions of the two particles are given by the 
vectors r! and ra, drawn from some origin, the position of the 
center of mass is given by 

. _ /rnri + w 2 r 2 (g _ 37) 

m\ + rri2 

This is the three-dimensional analogue of (9-25) and corresponds 
to the vector velocity of the center of mass as already defined by 
Eq. (9-33), so that 

»»lVl + /W2V2 = Mv 

where M (= m\ + m 2 ) is the total mass of the system. Ac- 
cordingly, we have 

F, + F 2 = F = M ^ (9-38) 


and this proves the result we are after: 

The motion of the center of mass of a system of two particles is 
the same as the motion of a single particle of mass equal to the 
total mass of the system acted on by the resultant of all the ex ternal 
forces which act on the individual particles. 

The implications of this result are significant. First, it 
suggests that a fundamental method for treating the motion of a 
system of particles is to analyze its motion as the combination 
of (1) the motion of its center of mass and (2) the motions of the 
particles relative to their center of mass. The latter motion, the 
internal motion of the system, is one of zero momentum, as we 
saw earlier. Furthermore, Eq. (9-38) allows us to treat some 
aspects of the motions of extended objects by the laws of dy- 
namics for a simple particle. In particular, when an extended 
object moves in translation, i.e., when there is no motion of any 
particle in the object relative to the center of mass, Eq. (9-38) 
tells the whole story. We shall return to such questions in Chap- 
ter 14. 

Incidentally, Eqs. (9-36) and (9-38) also provide a basis for 
a criterion as to whether or not a system of colliding particles is 
effectively isolated. The conservation of momentum in a col- 
lision process holds good only to the extent that the effect of any 
external forces can be ignored. If external forces are indeed 
present, the duration A/ of the collision must bc so short that 

353 Intcracting particles subject to cxternal forces 

the product F At is negligible. A different way of stating this 
same condition is that the forces of interaction between the 
colliding particles must be much greater than any external forces 
which may be acting. 


As our last example of collision processes and momentum 
transfers we shall take the calculation of the pressure of a gas, 
on the basis that this is due to the perfectly elastic collisions of 
the molecules of the gas with the atoms that comprise the wali 
of the container. 

We shall assume that the gas is made up of n particles, each 
of mass wi . P er urut volume. The most naive possible calculation 
makes the following assumptions: 

1. Ali the particles have the same speed, v. 

2. The particles can be regarded as though one third of 
them were, at any instant, traveling parallel to a given direction 
in space, with the other two thirds traveling parallel to two other 
directions, perpendicular to each other and to the first direction. 

3. The gas is in a rectangular container with perfectly flat, 
hard walls. 

None of these assumptions is in the least realistic as it stands. 
The first two are certainly false, the choice of a rectangular 
container is very special, and on an atomic scale the walls are 
knobbly and sticky, not flat and hard. Nevertheless, the calcula- 
tion we shall make, using these assumptions, comes very close to 
yielding the correct result. The reason is that, on the average, 
with the huge number of particles present in a sample of gas, 
there is an essential symmetry in the aggregate motion and an 
effectively exact conservation of the total kinetic energy. An 
individual molecule may strike the wali, sit there a short while, 
and jump off again at a different angle with a different speed— 
perhaps faster, perhaps slower. But on the average, we may 
treat the collisions as perfectly elastic because the kinetic energy 
of the gas as a whole neither increases nor decreases with time. 

On this basis, we make the following very simple calculation. 
Consider an element of area AA in one wali of the containing 
vessel (Fig. 9-24). Resolve the motions of the molecules so that 
the normal to AA is one of the three mutually perpendicular 
directions along which the molecules are assumed to move. Any 

354 Collisions and conservalion laws 

[«•— t>Af 



Fig. 9-24 Simplest possible approach to calculating 
the pressure of a gas. D uring a time At the elemen! of 
AA wali AA can be reached only by molecules that lle 

inilially within the cylinder oflengtk v At. 

one molecule approaches the wali with momentum m v and re- 
coils with momentum — m Q v; it thus provides an impulse 2moU. 
How many molecules strike A A in a time Ali If we assume that 
all of them have the same speed v, molecules farther than d At 
from the wali cannot arrive until after the time Ar has elapsed. 
Thus our attention is limited to molecules within a cylinder of 
cross section AA and length v A/. There are n molecules per 
unit volume. Hence 

number of molecules within cylinder = nv Ar AA 

But of these, only one sixth are moving, not just along a line 
perpendicular to AA, but specifically approaching AA instead of 
receding from it. This, then, gives us 

number of impacts with AA in A/ = \no At AA 
total impulse communicated to AA in Ar = 2mov X 5/J0 A; AA 

= $nmov 2 AtAA 

But the average force AF exerted on AA is the impulse divided by 
Ar. Hence 

AF = ^nmov 2 AA 

The mean force per unit area, exerted normal to the containing 
wali, is what we call the pressure, p. ' Thus we arrive at the 

P = ^ = \ nr »o» 2 (9-39) 

Since nm is the total mass of gas per unit volume, which is its 
density p, we can alternatively put 

P = hpv 2 




'In this section, p always refers to pressure, not momentum. 

355 The pressure of a gas 

Thus, if our calculation is justified, we can infer the speed of 
the invisible molecules from perfectly straightforward measure- 
ments of the bulk properties of the gas. Takung nitrogen at 
ordinary atmospheric pressure and room temperature, for ex- 
ample, we have 

p w 10 5 N/m 2 = 10 kg/m-sec 2 
p « 1.15 kg/m 3 


v « 500 m/sec 

How defensible is Eq. (9-39)? A more careful calculation 
is clearly called for. We have seen experimental evidence (Chap- 
ter 3) that the molecules of a gas at a given temperature have a 
wide spread of speeds. So the v 2 in our formula should be re- 
placed by some kind of an average squared speed, u 2 ,. And 
certainly we could not, on the strength of our own calculation, 
place much faith in the numerical factor 3 — although the rigorous 
theory confirms it, in fact. An acceptable treatment of the prob- 
lem must investigate the consequences of having molecules 
approaching the wali in quite arbitrary directions; it is only an 
accident that this does not change the result in detail. (It would, 
if we considered the numbers of particles striking AA, instead of 
the force they exert.) Nevertheless, the simple analysis that we 
have presented gives us a remarkably useful beginning for the 
understanding of bulk properties in microscopic terms. And, 
since the detailed kinetic theory of gases is not our present con- 
cern, we shall rest content with that. 


At the beginning of this chapter we pointed out that any con- 
servation law or conservation principle in physics is provisional, 
but that if, in the face of apparent failure, it is finally vindicated, 
then its status may be greatly strengthened. The most dramatic 
success of the conservation laws of dynamics took place in 
connection with the neutrino — that elusive, neutral particle 
emitted in the process of radioactive beta decay. The prediction 
of its existence stemmed from an apparent nonconservation of 
energy and angular momentum, but perhaps the most beautiful 
and direct dynamical evidence for it is furnished by the apparent 
nonconservation of linear momentum. 

356 Collisions and conservation laws 


Fig. 9-25 Evidence for the neutrino. 
The visible tracks of the electron and 
the recoiling lithium 6 nucleus in the 
beta decay of helium 6 in a eloud- 
chamber are not collinear. [Front J. 
Csikai and A. Szalay, Soviet Physics 
JETP, 8, 749 (1959).] 

The situation can be simply stated as follows: It is known 
that the process of beta decay involves the ejection of an electron 
from a nucleus, as a result of which the nuclear charge goes up 
by one unit (if the electron is an ordinary negative electron). If 
no other particles were involved, the process could be written 

A-»B + e~ 

where A is the initial nucleus and B the final nucleus. If A were 
effectively isolated, and initially stationary, our belief in linear 
momentum conservation would lead us to predict that, whatever 
the direction (or energy) of the ejected electron, the nucleus B 
would inevitably recoil in the opposite direction. Any departure 
from this, regardless of all other details, would demand the 
involvement of another particle. 

Figure 9-25 shows a cloud-chamber photograph of the beta 
decay of helium 6. The decay takes place at the position of the 
sharp knee near the top of the picture. The short stubby track 
pointing in a "northwesterly" direction is the recoiling nucleus 
of lithium 6; the other track is the electron. There must be 
another particle — the neutrino — if the final momentum vectors 
are to add up to have the same resultant — i.e., zero — as the 
initially stationary °He nucleus. It fails to reveal itself because 
its lack of charge, or of almost any other interaction, allows it to 
escape unnoticed — so readily, in fact, that the chance would be 
only about 1 in 10 12 of its interacting with any matter in passing 
right through the earth. 

9-1 A particle of mass m, traveling with vclocity vq, makes a com- 
pletely inelastic collision with an initially stationary particle of mass 

357 Problcms 

M. Make a graph of the final velocity o as a function of the ratio 
m/ M from m/ M = to m/ M = 10. 

9-2 Consider how conscrvation of linear momentum applies to a 
ball bouncing off a wali. 

9-3 A mouse is put into a small closed box that is placed upon a 
table. Could a clever mouse control the movements of the box over 
the table? Just what maneuvers could the mouse make the box per- 
form? If you were such a mouse, and your object were to elude 
pursuers, would you prefer that the table have a large, small, or 
negligible coefficient of friction? 

9-4 In the Phncipia, Newton mentions that in one set of collision 
experiments he found that the relative velocity of separation of two 
objects of a certain kind of material was five ninths of their relative 
velocity of approach. Suppose that an initially stationary object, of 
mass 3wo, of this material was struck by a similar object of mass 2/wo, 
traveling with an initial velocity Do- Find the final velocities of both 

9-5 A particle of mass mo, traveling at speed do. strikes a stationary 
particle of mass 2mo. As a result, the particle of mass mo is deflected 
through 45° and has a final speed of uo/2. Find the speed and direc- 
tion of the particle of mass 2/wo after this collision. Was kinetic energy 
conserved ? 

9-6 Two skaters (A and B), both of mass 70 kg, are approaching 
one another, each with a speed of 1 m/sec. A carries a bowling ball 
with a mass of 10 kg. Both skaters can toss the ball at 5 m/sec relative 
to themselves. To avoid collision they start tossing the ball back and 
forth when they are 10 m apart. Is one toss enough? How about 
two tosses, i. e., A gets the ball back? If the ball weighs half as much 
but they can throw twice as fast, how many tosses do they need? Plot 
the entire incident on a time versus displacement graph, in which the 
positions of the skaters are marked along the abseissa, and the advance 
of time is represented by the increasing value of the ordinate. (Mark 
the initial positions of the skaters at x = ±5 m, and include the 
space-time record of the ball's motion in the diagram.) This situation 
serves as a simple model of the present view of interaetions (repulsive, 
in the above examplc) between elementary particles. An attractive 
interaetion can be simulated by supposing that the skaters exchange 
a boomerang instead of a ball. [Thcse theorctical models were pre- 
sented by F. Reines and J. P. F. Sellschop in an artiele entitled 
"Neutrinos from the Atmosphere and Beyond," Sci. Am., 214, 40 
(Fcb. 1966).] 

9-7 Find the average recoil foree on a machine gun firing 240 rounds 
(shots) per minute, if the mass of each bullet is 10 g and the muzzle 
velocity is 900 m/sec. 

358 Collisions and conservation laws 

9-8 Water emerges in a vertical jet from a nozzle mounted on one 
end of a long horizontal metal tube, clamped at its other end and 
thin enough to be rather flexible. The jet rises to a height of 2.5 m 
above the nozzle, and the rate of water flow is 2 liter/min. It has 
been previously found by static experiments that the nozzle is de- 
pressed vertically by an amount proportional to the applied force, 
and that a mass of 10 g, hung upon it, causes a depression of 1 cm. 
How far is the nozzle depressed by the reaction force from the water jet ? 
[This problem is based on a demonstration experiment described by 
E. F. Schrader, Am. J. Phys., 33, 784 (1965).] 

9-9 A "standard fire stream" employed by a city fire department 
delivers 250 gallons of water per minute and can attain a height of 
70 ft on a building whose base is 63 ft from the nozzle. Neglecting 
air resistance: 

(a) What is the nozzle velocity of the stream? 

(b) If directed horizontally against a vertical wali, what force 
would the stream exert? (Assume that the water sprcads out over the 
surface of the wali without any rebound, so that the collision is ef- 
fectively inelastic.) 

9-10 A helicopter has a total mass M. Its main rotor blade sweeps 
out a circle of radius R, and air over this whole circular area is pulled 
in from above the rotor and driven vertically downward with a speed 
i>o- The density of air is p. 

(a) If the helicopter hovers at some fixed height, what must be 
the value of to? 

(b) One of the largest helicopters of the type described above 
weighs about 10 tons and has R ^ 10 m. What is to for hovering in 
thiscasc? Take p = 1.3 kg/m 3 . 

9-11 A rockct of initial mass Mo ejects its burnt fuel at a constant 
rate \dM/dt\ = y. and at a speed po relative to the rocket. 

(a) Calculate the initial acceleration of the rocket if it starts 
vertically upward from its launch pad. 

(b) If vo = 2000 m/sec, how many kilograms of fuel must be 
ejected per second to give such a rocket, of mass 1000 tons, an initial 
upward acceleration equal to 0.5 g? 

9-12 This rather complicated problem is designed to illustrate the 
advantage that can be obtained by the use of multiple-stage instead 
of single-stage rockets as launching vehicles. Suppose that the pay- 
load (e.g., a space capsule) has mass m and is mounted on a two-stage 
rocket (see the figure). The total mass — both rockets fully fueled, plus 
the payload — is Nm. The mass of the second-stage rocket plus the 
payload, after first-stagc burnout and separation, is nm. In each 
stage the ratio of burnout mass (casing) to initial mass (casing plus 
fuel) is r, and the exhaust speed is vo- 

(a) Show that the velocity i»j gained from first-stage burn, 

359 Problem* 





starting from rest (and ignoring gravity), is given by 

vi = v ln 


r /V + «(1 - r). 

(b) Obtain a corresponding expression for the additional velocity, 
V2, gained from thc second-stage burn. 

(c) Adding u i and i>2, you have the payload velocity v in terms 
of N, n, and r. Taking A' and r as constants, find the value of n for 
which f is a maximum. 

(d) Show that the condition for v to be a maximum corresponds 
to having equal gains of velocity in the two stages. Find the maximum 
value of o, and verify that it makes sense for the limiting cases de- 
scribed by r = and r = 1 . 

(e) Find an expression for the payload velocity of a single-stage 
rocket with the same values of A', r, and vo- 

(f) Suppose that it is desired to obtain a payload velocity of 
10 km/sec, using rockets for which vo = 2.5 km/sec and r = 0.1. 
Show that the job can be done with a two-stage rocket but is im- 
possible, however large the value of N, with a single-stage rocket. 

(g) If you are ambitious, try extending the analysis to an arbi- 
trary number of stages. It is possible to show that once again the 
greatest payload velocity for a given total initial mass is obtained if the 
stages are so designcd that the velocity increment contributed by each 
stage is the same. 

9-13 A block of mass m, initially at rest on a frictionless surface, is 
bombarded by a succession of particles each of mass bm (<<C m) and 
of initial speed t>o in the positive x direction. The collisions are per- 
fectly elastic and each particle bounces back in the negative x direction. 
Show that the speed acquired by the block after the «th particle has 
struck it is given very nearly by v = i>o(l — e" an ), wherea = 2Sm/m. 
Consider the validity of this result for an « 1 as well as for an — » oo . 

9-14 Newton calculated the resistive force for an object traveling 
through a fluid by supposing that the particles of the fluid (supposedly 
initially stationary) rebounded elastically when struck by the object. 

(a) On this model, the resistive force would vary as some power, 
n, of the speed o of the object. What is the value of n'! 

(b) Suppose that a flat-ended object of cross-sectional area A is 
moving at speed v through a fluid of density p. By picturing the fluid 

360 Collisions and conservation laws 

as composed of n particles, each of mass m, per unit volume (such 
that nm = p), obtain an explicit expression for the resistive force if 
each particle that is struck by the object recoils elastically from it. 

(c) If the object, instead of being flat-ended, were a massive 
sphere of radius r, traveling at speed v through a medium of density p, 
what would the magnitude of the resistive force be? The whole cal- 
culation can be carried out from the standpoint of a frame attached 
to the sphere, so that the fluid particles approach it with the velocity 
-v. Assume that in this frame the fluid particles are reflected as by a 
mirror— angle of reflection equals angle of incidence (see the figure). 
You must consider the surface of the sphere as divided up into circular 
zones corresponding to small angular increments dd at the various 
possible valucs of 0. 

9-15 A particle of mass mi and initial velocity «i strikes a stationary 
particle of mass mi. The collision is perfectly elastic. It is observed 
that after the collision the particles have equal and opposite velocities. 

(a) The ratio 012/011. 

(b) The velocity of the center of mass. 

(c) The total kinetic energy of the two particles in the center 
of mass frame expressed as a fraction of %m\Ui 2 . 

(d) The final kinetic energy of 011 in the lab frame. 

9-16 A mass /«1 collides with a mass 012. Define relative velocity 
as the velocity of 011 observed in the rest frame of 0*2. Show the 
equivalence of the following two statements : 

(1) Total kinetic energy is conserved. 

(2) The magnitude of the relative velocity is unchanged. 

(It is suggested that you solve the problem for a one-dimensional 
collision, at least in the first instance.) 

9-17 A collision appa ratus is made of a set of n graded masses sus- 
pended so that they are in a horizontal line and not quite in contact 
with one another (see the figure). The first mass is jmo, the second is 
f 2 mo, the third / 3 0!o, and so on, so that the last mass hfma. The 
first mass is struck by a particle of mass 010 traveling at a speed vo. 
This produccs a succession of collisions along the line of masses. 

361 Problem s 


O o6666666ii A 

m fm„ fm„ 

(a) Assuming that all the collisions are perfectly elastic, show 
that the last mass flies off with a speed o„ given by 

1 + /, 


(b) Hence show that, if / is close to unity, so that it can be 
written as 1 ± e (with e <JC 1), this system can be used to transfer 
virtually all the kinetic energy of the incident mass to the last one, 
even for large n. 

(c) For / = 0.9, n = 20, calculate the mass, speed, and kinetic 
energy of the last mass in the line in terms of the mass, speed, and 
kinetic energy of the incident particle. Compare this with the result 
of a direct collision between the incident mass and the last mass in 
the line. 

9-18 A 2-kg and an 8-kg mass collide elastically, compressing a 
spring bumper on one of them; the bumper returns to its original 
length as the masses separate. Assume that the collision takes place 
along a single line and that you can cause the collision to occur in 
different ways, each having the same initial energy: 
Case A: The 8-kg mass has 16 J of kinetic energy and hits the sta- 

tionary 2-kg mass. 
Case B: The 2-kg mass has 16 J of kinetic energy and hits the sta- 

tionary 8-kg mass. 

(a) Which way of causing the collision to occur will result i n 
the greater compression of the spring? Arrive at your choice without 
actually solving for the compression of the spring. 

(b) Keeping the condition of a total initial kinetic energy of 
16 J, how should this energy be divided between the two masses to 
obtain the greatest possible compression of the spring? 

9-19 In a certain road accident (this is based on an actual case) a car 
of mass 2000 kg, traveling south, collided in the middle of an inter- 
section with a truck of mass 6000 kg, traveling west. The vehicles 
locked and skidded off the road along a line pointing almost exactly 
Southwest. A witness claimed that the truck had entered the inter- 
section at 50 mph. 

(a) Do you believe the witness? 

(b) Whether or not you believe him, what fraction of the total 

362 Collisions and conservation laws 

initial kinetic energy was converted into other forms of energy by 

9-20 A nucleus A of mass 2m, traveling with a velocity u, collides 
with a stationary nucleus of mass 10/w. The collision results in a change 
of the total kinetic energy. After collision the nucleus A is observed 
to be traveling with speed Pi at 90° to its original direction of motion, 
and B is traveling with speed Da at angle 8 (sin 6 = 3/5) to the original 
direction of motion of A. 

(a) What are the magnitudes of vi and U2? 

(b) What fraction of the initial kinetic energy is gained or lost 
as a result of the interaction? 

9-21 A particle of mass m and initial velocity u collides elastically 
with a particle of mass M initially at rest. As a result of the collision 
the particle of mass m is deflected through 90° and its speed is reduced 
to «/\/3. The particle of mass M recoils with speed p at an angle 6 to 
the original direction of m. (Ali speeds and angles are those observed 
in the laboratory system.) 

(a) Find M in terms of m, and v in terms of u. Find also the 
angle 0. 

(b) At what angles are the particles deflected in the center-of- 
mass system? 

9-22 Make measurements on the stroboscopic photographs of a col- 
lision of two magnetized pucks (Fig. 9-23) to test the conservation 
of linear momentum and total kinetic energy between the initial state 
(first three time units) and the final state (last three time units). 

9-23 A particle of mass 2m and of velocity u strikes a second particle 
of mass 2m initially at rest. As a result of the collision, a particle of 
mass m is produced which moves off at 45° with respect to the initial 
direction of the incident particle. The other product of this rearrange- 
ment collision is a particle of mass 3m. Assuming that this collision 
involves no significant change of total kinetic energy, calculate the 
speed and direction of the particle of mass 3/w in the Lab and in the 
CM frame. 

9-24 In a historic piecc of research, James Chadwick in 1932 obtained 
a value for the mass of the neutron by studying elastic collisions of 
fast neutrons with nuclei of hydrogen and nitrogen. He found that 
the maximum recoil velocity of hydrogen nuclei (initially stationary) 
was 3.3 X 10 7 m/sec, and that the maximum recoil velocity of nitrogen 
14 nuclei was 4.7 X 10 u m/sec with an uncertainty of ±10%. What 
does this tell you about 

(a) The mass of a neutron ? 

(b) The initial velocity of the neutrons used? 

(Take the uncertainty of the nitrogen measurement into account. 
Take the mass of an H nucleus as 1 amu and the mass of a nitrogen 14 

363 Problems 

nucleus as 14 amu.) 

9-25 A cloud-chamber photograph showed an alpha particle of mass 
4 amu with an initial velocity of 1.90 X 10 7 m/sec colliding with a 
nucleus in the gas of the chamber. The collision changed the direction 
of motion of the alpha particle by 12° and reduced its speed to 1.18 X 
10 7 m/sec. The other particle, initially stationary, acquired a velocity 
of 2.98 X 10 7 m/sec at 18° with respect to the initial forward direc- 
tion of the alpha particle. What was this second particle ? Was the 
collision elastic? (In interpreting your results, take account of the 
fact that these cloud-chamber measurements of speeds and angles are 
subject to errors of up to a few percent.) 

9-26 A nuclear reactor has a moderator of graphite. The carbon 
nuclei in the atoms of this crystal lattice can be regarded as effectively 
free to recoil if struck by fast neutrons, although they cannot be 
knocked out of place by thermal neutrons. A fast neutron, of kinetic 
energy 1 MeV, collides elastically with a stationary carbon 12 nucleus. 

(a) What is the initial speed of each particle in the center of 
mass frame? 

(b) As measured in the center-of-mass frame, the velocity of the 
carbon nucleus is turned through 135° by the collision. What are the 
final speed and direction of the neutron as measured in the lab frame? 

(c) About how many elastic collisions, involving random 
changes of direction, must a neutron make with carbon nuclei if its 
kinetic energy is to be reduced from 1 MeV to 1 keV? Assume that 
the mean energy loss is midway between maximum and minimum 

9-27 (a) A moving particle of mass M collides perfectly elastically 
with a stationary particle of mass m < M. Show that the maximum 
possible angle through which the incident particle can be deflected is 
sin -1 (/w/M). (Use of the vector diagrams of the collision in Lab and 
CM systems will be found helpful.) 

(b) A particle of mass m collides perfectly elastically with a 
stationary particle of mass M > m. The incident particle is deflected 
through 90°. At what angle d with the original direction of m does the 
more massive particle recoil? 

9-28 The text (p. 348) gives an examplc of the analysis of the dynamics 
of a nuclear reaction between two deuterons. Another possible reac- 
tion is the following: 

?H + fH -♦ !H + ]H + 4.0 MeV 

In this case the reaction products are a proton and a triton (the latter 
being the nucleus of the unstable isotope hydrogen 3 or tritium). 
Suppose that a stationary deuteron is struck by an incident deuteron 
of kinetic energy 5 MeV. 

364 Collisions and conscrvation laws 

(a) What are the maximum and minimum possible values of the 
kinetic energy of the proton produced in this reaction? 

(b) What is the maximum angle (as observed in the laboratory) 
that the direction of the triton can make with the direction of the 
incident deuteron? What is its kinetic energy as measured in the lab- 
oratory when it is emitted in this direction? (This problem can be 
conveniently handled with the use of amu and MeV as units through- 

9-29 A boat of mass M and length L is floating in the water, sta- 
tionary; a man of mass m is sitting at the bow. The man stands up, 
walks to the stern of the boat, and sits down again. 

(a) If the water is assumed to offer no resistance at all to motion 
of the boat, how far does the boat move as a result of the man's trip 
from bow to stern? 

(b) More realistically, assume that the water offers a viscous 
resistance given by —kv, where A: is a constant and o is the velocity 
of the boat. Show that in this case one has the remarkable result that 
the boat should eventually return to its initial position. 

(c) Consider the paradox presented by the fact that, according 
to (b), any nonzero value of k, however small, implies that the boat 
ends up at its starting point, but a strictly zero value implies that it 
ends up somewhere else. How do you explain this discontinuous jump 
in the final position when the variation of k can be imagined as con- 
tinuous, down to zero? For enlightenment see the short and clear 
analysis by D. Tilley. Am. J. Phys., 35, 546 (1967). 

365 Problcms 

Conservation of Energy as a principle . . . has played a 
fundamental role, the most fundamental as some would say, 
in the last half-century of classical physics, and since then 
in quantum mechanics. . . . Yet it is a curiosity that this, 
which is thefirst law of thermodynamics, should have so 
fruitfully watered the stonier, the more austere terrain of 

C. G. GILLISPIE, The Edge of Objedivity (1960) 

It may be thought strange that we have brought our 
discussion of the foundations of mechanics sofar with 
hardly a mention ofenergy. . . . We have indeed had no 
desire to slight the significance of this concept, but have 
wished to emphasize that the logical foundation of mechanics 
is quite possible without it. . . . The guestion at once 
arises: why then should it have been introduced at all? 
This is what we wish to discuss. 


Foundations of Physics (1936) 


Energy conservation in 
dynamics; vibrational 


of all the physical concepts, that of energy is perhaps the most 
far-reaching. Everyone, whether a scientist or not, has an aware- 
ness of energy and what it means. Energy is what we have to pay 
for in order to get things done. The word itself may remain in 
the background, but we recognize that each gallon of gasoline, 
each Btu of heating gas, each kilowatt-hour of electricity, each 
car battery, each calorie of food value, represents, in one way or 
another, the wherewithal for doing what we call work. We do 
not think in terms of paying for force, or acceleration, or momen- 
tum. Energy is the universal currency that exists in apparently 
countless denominations; and physical processes represent a 
conversion from one denomination to another. 

The above remarks do not really define energy. No matter. 
It is worth recalling once more the opinion that H. A. Kramers 
expressed: "The most important and most fruitful concepts are 
those to which it is impossible to attach a well-defined meaning." ' 
The clue to the immense value of energy as a concept lies in its 
transformation. It is consewed— that is the point. Although we 
may not be able to define energy in general, that does not mean 

'See p. 62, where we quoted Kramers' remark in connection with our dis- 
cussion ofi the concept of time. 


that it is only a vague, qualitative idea. We have set up quantita- 
tive measures of various specific kinds of energy: gravitational, 
electrical, magnetic, elastic, kinetic, and so on. And whenever a 
situation has arisen in which it seemed that energy had disap- 
peared, it has always been possible to recognize and define a new 
form of energy that permits us to save the conservation law. And 
conservation laws, as we remarked at the beginning of Chapter 9, 
represent one of the physicist's most powerful tools for organizing 
his description of nature. 

In this book we shall be dealing only with the two main cate- 
gories of energy that are relevant to classical mechanics — the 
kinetic energy associated with the bodily motion of objects, and 
the potential energy associated with elastic deformations, grav- 
itational attractions, electrical interactions, and the like. If energy 
should be transferred from one or another of these forms into 
Chemical energy, radiation, or the random molecular and atomic 
motion we call heat, then from the standpoint of mechanics it is 
lost. This is a very important feature, because it means that, if we 
restrict our attention to the purely mechanical aspects, the con- 
servation of energy is not binding; it must not be blindly assumed. 
Nevertheless, as we shall see, there are many physical situations 
for which the conservation of the total mechanical energy holds 
good, and in such contexts it is of enormous value in the analysis 
of physical problems. 

It is an interesting historical sidelight that in pursuing the 
subject of energy we are temporarily parting company with New- 
ton, although not with what we may properly call Newtonian 
mechanics. In the whole of the Principia, with its awe-inspiring 
elucidation of the dynamics of the universe, the concept of energy 
is never once used or even referred to! ' For Newton, F = ma 
was enough. But we shall see how the energy concept, although 
rooted in F = ma, has its own special contributions to make. We 
shall begin with the quantitative connection between work and 
kinetic energy. 


In Chapter 6 we briefly presented the basic notion of the work 

'As we remarked in Chapter 9, however, some of Newton's contemporaries, 
particularly Huygens and Leibnitz, did recognize the importance of an energy- 
like quantity— the "vis viva" mo 2 —\a certain contexts, such as collisions and 
pendulum motions. 

368 Energy conservation in dynamics 

done by a force acting on an object, producing a corresponding 
increase in the kinetic energy of the object. We shall now return 
to this topic and develop it considerably further. 

Let us again take, for a start, the simple and familiar case of 
an object of mass m acted on by a constant force F (we shall begin 
by assuming a straight-line motion for which vector symbols are 
unnecessary). Then by Newton's law we have 

do do 

F = — = m — — ma 
di dt 

Let the force act for a time t during which the velocity changes 
from Vi to v 2 - Then we have 

Fl = mal = m(o 2 - ui) (10-la) 

This expresses the fact that the impulse of F is equal to the change 
of linear momentum. But suppose we multiply the force by the 
distance over which it acts, instead of by the time. In this case we 

VI + V2 . 
Fx = max = ma — / 

= £m(ar)(Di + u 2 ) 

= im(v 2 - ui)(ui + Wl) 


Fx = \mv2 2 - J/wi 2 00-2a) 

This expresses the fact that the work done by F is equal to the 
change of kinetic energy. We have no reason to declare a prefer- 
ence between Eqs. (10-la) and (10-2a) as statements of the effect 
of the force. In fact, they will in general tell us different things. 
But before amplifying that last remark, let us note that the 
restriction to constant force and constant acceleration is unneces- 
sary. For we have 

F- m d ° 

Multiplying by dt and integrating gives us 


'2 r »2 

F di = m do = m(o 2 - ci) (10-lb) 

J Vl 

Multiplying by dx and integrating gives us 
369 Integrals of motion 

£ '*—£%* 


dv dx 

—rdx — —rdo = vav 

di dt 






vdv = £j»((?2 — Ci ) 


The left-hand side of Eq. (10-1 b) is the total impulse of the force, 
and the left-hand side of Eq. (10-2b) is of course defined as the 
total work done by the force. Each of these integrals can be repre- 
sented as the area under the appropriate graph of F against / or 
x between ccrtain limits (see Fig. 10-1). 

The general similarity of Eqs. (10-lb) and (10-2b) is, however, 
deceptive, because force, displacement, and velocity are vector 
quantities. The result of applying a force of a given magnitude 
depends very much on its direction relative to the direction of 
motion of the object on which it acts. Thus in circular motion, as 
we have seen, a net force is continually applied to an object, the 
momentum (also a vector) changes continuously, but the mag- 
nitude of the velocity docs not change at all. 

The situation becomes clear if we return to the proper 
vector statement of Newton's law: 

F = m — 


It is still possible to integrate directly with respect to /: 

Fig. 10-1 (a) Force 
that varies linearly 
with time. The area 
under the curve mea- 
sures the total impulse. 
(b) The same force 
plotted as afunction of 
displacement. The 
area under the curve 
measures the total 

370 Energy conservation in dynamics 

¥dt = m(v2 — vi) 

The left-hand side of the expression is an instruction that, if the 
direction of the force changes with time, we must form the appro- 
priate vector sum of all the small impulses F A/ applied in suc- 
cessive time intervals At between t\ and / 2 . That is exactly how 
Newton himself conceived the action of the varying force to which 
a planet, for example, finds itself exposed as it moves along its 
orbit around the sun (cf. Chapter 13). But what about integrating 
F over the elements of distance along a path, where these elements 
(Ar) are themselves vectors? This is essentially a physical question, 
not a mathematical one. We are asking: What is the effect of 
applying a force at some arbitrary direction to the motion of an 
object? Figure 10-2 helps to supply the answer. If a force F! 
is applied at right angles to v for some very short time At, it 
changes the direction of the velocity without appreciably changing 
its magnitude. If a force F 2 is applied along the direction of v, 
it changes the magnitude of v without changing the direction. 
Thus if we want to fix our attention on changes in the magnitude 
of v, we should restrict ourselves to forces or force components 
along the direction of v. If the net force F acts at an angle d to v, 
we have its component along v given by 

|F| cos 6 = m 

|Av| cos d 

where Av is the vector change in v, equal to ¥ At/m [cf. Fig. 
10-2(c)]. The element of distance traveled during At is given by 

Ar = vA/ 

Fig. 10-2 (a) Velocity change due to an impulse perpendicular to v. (b) Velocity 
change due to an impulse parallel to v. (c) Velocity change due to an arbitrary 

371 Integrals of motion 

by the definition of the vclocity vector. Hence the force com- 
ponent along v, multiplicd by the displacement, is given by 

|F| [Ar| cos d = m |v| |Av| cos 6 

The above is a scalar equation; we have suppressed all reference 
to the effect of F in changing the direction of v and are left with 
information about the magnitude only. To express this more 
neatly we use the notation of the "dot product" (or scalar product) 
of two vectors : 

a • b = |a; |b| cos e = ab cos e 

In this notation, we have 

F • Ar = m(y ■ Av) 

But we can now play a neat (and valuable) trick. Consider the 
quantity v • v. This is a scalar, and its magnitude is just the square 
of |v|, i.e., o 2 simply. But since 

v 2 = v • v 

we have, by differentiation, 

A(u 2 ) = Av ■ v + v - Av = 2v • Av 

(This last step is possible because the scalar product of two 
vectors is indepcndent of the order in which the factors come — 
i.e., the commutative law holds.) Hence 

v • Av = J A(u 2 ) 

It follows that we have 

F-Ar = Jmift) 2 ) 

So now, integrating over any path that the body may have fol- 
lowed under the aetion of the force, we find the relation 

W = \ F- Jt = lm(02 2 - d') (10-3) 

-' r i 

which deseribes in general terms the relation between the work 
done and the change of kinetic energy. 

Figure 10-3 illustrates what is involved in evaluating the 
work integral of Eq. (10-3), in going from a point A (r0 to a 
point B (r 2) in a two-dimcnsional displacement. 

372 Enerev conservalion in dynamies 

Fig. 10-3 Calcula- 
tion of work done 
along a given path. 

Equation (10-3) displays the most important property of 
work and energy: They are scalar quantities. An object moving 
vertically with a speed v has cxactly the same kinetic energy as 
if it were traveling horizontally at this same speed, although its 
vector momentum would be quite different. This scalar property 
of energy will be exp!oited repeatedly in our future work. 


This chapter is chiefly conccrned with dcveloping some general 
dynamical methods based upon the concepts of work and me- 
chanical energy. The practical use of these methods will, however, 
involve numerical measures of these quantities in terms of appro- 
priate units. The purpose of this section is to introduce some 
of these units for future reference. 

Our basic unit, already introduced in Chapter 6, will be the 
unit of work or energy in the MKS system — the joule: 

1 J = 1 N-m = 1 kg-m 2 /sec 2 

If the CGS system of units is uscd, the unit of energy is the erg: 

1 erg = 1 dyn-cm = 10 -7 J 

Before going any further, wc shall introduce a seeming diversion 
— the concept of power, defined as the rate of doing work: 



(For a mechanical system, putting dW = F • t/r, we have power = 
F ■ v.) Power is a concept (and a quantity) of great practical 
importance, because the time that it takes to perform some given 

373 Work, energy, and power 

amount of work may be a vital consideration. For example, a 
small electric motor may be just as capable of driving a hoist as a 
big one (given, perhaps, a few extra gear wheels), but it may be 
quite unacceptable because the job would take far too long. 
Power is essentially a practical engineering concept ; we shall not 
be using it in our development of the principles of dynamics. But 
one of our accepted measures of work is often expressed in terms 
of a unit of power — the watt. In terms of mechanical quantities, 

1 W = 1 J/sec 


1 W-sec = 1 J 

The most familiar use of the watt is, of course, electrical, through 
the relation watts = volts X amperes, but it is important to 
realize that it is not a specifically electrical quantity. ' A con- 
venient energy unit for domestic purposes (especially one's 
electricity bill) is the kilowatt-hour (kWh): 

lkWh = 3.6 X 10 6 J 

In chemical and thermal calculations the Standard unit is the 
Calorie, defined as the amount of energy required to raise 1 kg 
ofwaterfrom 15 to 16°C: 

1 Cal = 4.2 X 10 :i J 

In atomic and nuclear physics, energy measurements are usually 
expressed in terms of the electron volt (eV) or its related units 
keV (10 3 ), MeV (10 G ), and GeV (10 9 ). The electron volt is 
the amount of energy required to raise one elementary charge 
through 1 V of electric potential difference: 

leV = 1.6 X 10- 19 J 

Finally, as Einstein first suggested and as innumerable observa- 

'The other familiar unit of power is of course the horsepower. About this 
we shall say only that 1 hp = 746 W, so that (as a very rough rule of thumb) 
one can say that it takes about 1 kw to drive a 1 hp electric motor. 

Most of the power levels of practical importance can be conveniently 
described using power units based on the watt— microwatts (10 " 6 W, 
typical of very weak radio signals), milliwatts (10~ 3 W), kilowatts (10 3 W), 
and megawatts (10° W, useful as a unit in generating-plant specifications). 
It is worth noticing, for comparison, that the sun's power output is about 
3.8 X 10" W! 

374 Energy conservation in dynamics 


- - 10" J 

- - io^J 

- - I0»>J 


- - I0"J 


--io-"> J 



Energy equivalenl of sun's mass (fi = mc') 

Daily cncrgy oulpui of our galaxy 

Kinelic energy of earth* orbital molion (relalive lo sun) 

Daily energy oulpui of sun 

Kinelic energy of moon's orbital motion (relalive lo earth) 

Solar energy received per day on earth 

World uscof cncrgy in 1950 <I0 M J/y) 

Kinelic energy of a eyelone 

Daily energy oulput of Hoover Dam 

Solar energy per day on 2 square miles 

Burning of 7000 tons of coal 

Energy released in complete fission of I kg of U 05 

Energy equivalent (£ ■ m< *) of I g of malter 

Energy of explosion of I ton of TNT 

Energy conlenl of average daily diet 

One kilowatt-hour 

Kinelic energy of rifle bullet 


Energy cquivalcnt (K — («<•') of one atomic mass unil 

Energy produced by fission (slow neutrons) of one nueleus of U or Pu 

Energy equivalent (£" = »i< ■*) of one cleclron mass 

Average energy lo produce one ion pair in air ( - 35 e V) 
Energy lo break a DNA molecule in two (-0.1 eV) 

Kinetic energy per molecule ai room temperature (0.025 eV) 

Energy of a photon a I radio broadeast frequencies 
Kinetic energy of an electron moving al I m/sec 

tions have confirmed, there is an equivalence between what we 
customarily call mass and what we customarily call energy. In 
classical mcchanics thcsc arc trcated as entirely separate concepts, 
but it is perhaps worth quoting this equivalence here, so that we 
have our selection of energy measures all in one place: 

1 kg of mass is cquivalent to 9 X 10 16 J 

For the sake of interest, we show in Table 10-1 some repre- 
sentative physical cxamplcs involving different orders of magni- 
tude of energy, all expressed in terms of our basic mechanical 
unit, the joule. 


Wc shall begin with a simple and very familiar problem. An object 
has been thrown vertically upward and is moving under gravity, 
losing speed as it goes higher. Let us take a y axis, positive up- 
ward, and suppose that the object passes the horizontal level 
y = yi with velocity u t and reaches y = y 2 with velocity v 2 
(Fig. 10-4). Thcn the purely kinematic deseription of the motion 
is given by 

v 2 2 = m 2 + 2a0> 2 - .yi) 

a- -g 
leading to the familiar result 1 

.„2 _ ,,,2 


= v\ 2 — 2g(yz - yi) 

Now let us consider this in terms of work and energy. The changc 
of the kinetie energy (K) between >>i and y 2 is given by 

K 2 — K\ = Jmi>2 a — \mv\ z 
Using the preceding kinematic equation this can be written 

K 2 — K\ = — mgiyz — yi) 
Now the quantity — mg is just the constant gravitational foree, 

■Remember, we have defined g as a positice number equal to ihe magnilude 
of the local gravitational acceleration in any units that may be chosen. 

376 Energy conservalion in dynamics 




Fig. 10-4 Velocity change associated with vertkal 
motion under gramty. 

F„, that acts on the object as it moves up from y\ to y 2 (see Fig. 
10-4). Thus we see that the change of K is precisely equal to the 
work donc by the gravitational force, in conformity with the 
general rcsult expressed by Eq. (10-3): 

K 2 - K x = F,0» 2 - yi) 

We are going to rewrite this equation in a different way, 
such that the quantities referring to the position y = y\ appear 
on one side, and the quantities referring to the position y = y 2 
appear on the other. We shall express the result in what may seem 
at first to be a clumsy fashion, but the reason will quickly appear. 
Our new statement of the rcsult is 

K 2 + (-F„y 2 ) -Xi + (.-F yi) (10-4) 

What we have done here is to deliberately frame the mathe- 
matical statement in such a way that the sum of two quantities has 
the same valuc at two different positions. That is the formal basis 
of the statement of conscrvation of cnergy. We define the potential 
energy U(y) at any given value of y through the cquation 

l/GO = -F,y G0-5) 

(thus making U = at y = 0). ' Notice particularly that U(y) is 
the negalive of the work done by the gravitational force. Sub- 
stituting this definition of the potential energy into Eq. (10-4) 
we thus gct 

E = K 2 + U 2 = tf , + Ui (10-6) 

where E is the total mechanical energy. Putting F e — —mg in 
Eq. (10-5), we have the well-known result 

£/(/,) = mgh 

for an object at height h above the ground (or other horizontal 
level that is defined as the zero of potential energy). For this case 

'We shall use the symbol U for potential energy throughout this book. The 
symbol V is widely uscd also, but we shall avoid it here because we so often 
use t's (large and small) to denote velocities. 

377 Gravitational potentiaJ energy 

Fig. 10-5 Energy 
diagram for vertical 
motion above a hori- 
zontal surface. 

the energy-conservation statement can be simply represented as 
in Fig. 10-5. We shall have more to say about such graphs shortly. 
You will undoubtedly be familiar with another way of inter- 
preting a potential encrgy such as U(h) in the last equation. It 
represents exactly the amount of work that we would have to do 
in order to raise an object through a distance h, against the gravi- 
tational puli, without giving it any kinetic energy. In order to 
achieve this, we must supply an exlernal force, F ext ; if this is 
insignificantly greater than mg, the object will move upward with 
negligibly small acceleration (F nct « 0), thus arriving at some 
higher level (Fig. 10-6) with almost zero velocity. 1 If the object 

Fig. 10-6 Use ofan exterrtal 
force to move an object in the 
direction of increasing gravita- 
tionai potential energy. 

'To make it even more precise, wc could apply a force just a shade bigger 
than mg for a brief time at the beginning, to get the object moving, then 
change to F„ t exactly equal to mg for most of the trip (the object thus con- 
tinuing to move upward at constant velocity under zero net force), and 
finally let F„, become a shade less than mg for a brief time just before the 
end, so that the object finishes up at rest at height /i above its starting point. 

378 Energy conservation in clynamics 

is subsequently released, then the work done on it by the gravi- 
tational force is given to the object as kinetic energy (corre- 
sponding to traveling from y = h to y = in Fig. 10-5). Many 
devices (pile drivers are a particularly clear example) operate in 
precisely this way. 


K 2 - Ki = I F(x)dx (10-7) 

Equation (10-6) is a compact statement of the conservation of 
total mechanical energy in any one-dimensional problem for which 
the force acting on an object, due to its environment, depends 
only on the object's position. To derive this energy-conservation 
result more generally, suppose that the environment supplies a 
force F(x) that varies with position x in any arbitrary way — but 
has a unique value at any given value of x. The work done by this 
force as an object moves from xi to x 2 is given by 

W= \ F(x)dx 
Equating this work to the change of kinetic energy, we have 

In order to cast this into the form of a conservation statement, 
we introduce an arbitrary reference point x and express the work 
integral as follows: 

r*i r 'z r 'i 

/ F(x)dx = / F{x)dx- / F(x)dx (10-8) 

y i, J x J x 

Substituting this in Eq. (10-7), we have 

K 2 + \-J F(x) dx - Ki + 1 - / F(x) dx\ 

We then define the potential energy U(x) at any point x by the 
following equation: 

U(x) - U(x ) = - / F(x)dx (10-9) 


Notice once again the minus sign on the right. The potential 
energy at a point, relative to the reference point, is always defined 

379 More about one-dimensional situations 

as the negatioe of the work done by the force as the object moves 
from the reference point to the point considered. The value of 
U(x ), the potential energy at the reference point itself, can be 
set equal to zero if we please, because in any actual problem we 
are concerned only with differences of potential energy between 
one point and another, and the associated changes of kinetic 

In obtaining Eq. (10-9) we took the force as the primary 
quantity and the potential energy as the secondary one. Increas- 
ingly, however, as one goes deeper into mechanics, potential 
energy takcs over the primary role, and force becomes the derived 
quantity— literally so, indeed, because by differentiation of both 
sides of Eq. (10-9) with respect to x, we obtain 

F(x) = - ^ (10-10) 

This inversion of the roles is not just a formal one (although it 
does prove to be valuable theoretically) for there are many 
physical situations in which one's only measurements are of 
energy differences between two very distinct states, and in which 
one has no direct knowledge of the forces acting. The electronic 
work function of a metal, for example, and the dissociation 
energy of a molecule, represent the only directly observable 
quantities in these processes of removing a particle to infinity 
from some initial location. How the force varies from point to 
point may not be known well — perhaps not at all. 

We shall often be spelling out the kinetic energy K in terms 
of m and v, so that the equation of energy conservation in one 
dimension is written as follows: 

$mv 2 + U(x) = E (10-11) 

Suppose we choose any particular value of x. Then Eq. (10-11) 
becomes a quadratic equation for v with two equal and opposite 

D(x) = ± (^^)" 2 dO-12) 

This is the expression of a familiar result, which we can discuss 
in terms of motion under gravity. If an object were observed to 
pass a certain point, traveling vertically upward with speed v, 
then (to the approximation that air resistance could be ignored) 
it would be observed, a little later, to pass the same point, traveling 

380 Energy conservation in dynamics 

downward at the same speed v. The direction of the velocity has 
been reversed, but there has becn no loss or gain of kinetic energy. 
In such a case the force is said to be conseruatiue. We can see 
from Eq. (10-12) that this result will hold as long as U(x) is a 
unique function of x. It means that a particle, after passing 
through any given point at any speed, will be found to have the 
same kinetic energy every time it passes through that point again. 

Under what conditions does the force have this conservative 
property? It will certainly not be conservative if F(x) depends 
on the direction of motion of the object to which it is applied. 
Consider, for example, the addition of a resistive force to the 
gravitational force in the vertical motion of an object. As the 
object goes upward through a certain point, the net force on it 
(downward) is greater than F„. After it reaches its highest point 
and begins moving down, the net force on it (again downward) 
is less than F„. Hence the net negative work done on it as it rises is 
numerically greater than the net positive work as it desccnds. 
Thus on balance negative work has been done and the kinetic 
energy as the object passes back through the designated point is 
less than initially. The crucial feature is, indeed, that the net work 
done by F(x) should be zero over any journey beginning and 
ending at any given value of x\ only if this condition is satisfied 
can one define a potential-energy function. It might seem that an 
equivalent condition is that F be a unique function of position. 
In one-dimensional situations this is correct. In two- and three- 
dimensional situations, howevcr, as we shall see later (Chapter 
1 1), the condition that F be a single-valued function of r is neces- 
sary but not sufficient. The condition of zero net work over any 
closed path defines a conservative force in all circumstances and 
should be remembered as a basic definition. 


The use of energy diagrams, such as that of Fig. 10-5, provides 
an excellent way of obtaining a complete, although pcrhaps quali- 
tative, picture of possible motions in a one-dimensional system. 
Frequently the information so obtained suffices for obtaining 
physical insight into situations for which analytic solutions are 
complicated or even unobtainable. In fact, even when analytic 
solutions can be obtained in terms of unfamiliar functions, they 
often are of little help in revealing the essential physical charac- 
teristics of the motion. The general scheme is as follows: We 

381 The energy meihocl for one-dimensional motions 

i. i ,— , — . 


:■< c 6 I„ «, 

X <f 

Fig. 10-7 Hypothetical energy diagram for a one-dimen- 
sional system. 

plot U(x) as a function of x, and on the same plot draw horizontal 
lines corresponding to different total energies. In Fig. 10-7 is 
shown such a potential-energy curve and several values of the 
total energy. 

The kinetic energy K of a particle is equal to (E — U), i.e., 
to the vertical distance from one of the lines of constant energy 
to the curve U(x) at any point x. For a low energy E u U(x) is 
greater than E for all values of x; this would simply imply a 
negative value of K and hence an imaginary value of v. Such a 
situation has no place in classical mechanics — although it must 
not be discarded so lightly when one comes to atomic and nuclear 
systems requiring the use of quantum mechanics. For a higher 
total energy E 2 , the motion can occur in two regions, between x% 
and x 4 or between x 7 and x&. These represent two quite separate 
situations, because a particle cannot escape from one region to the 
other as long as its energy is held at the value E 2 . One way of 
seeing this is, of course, in terms of the impossible negative value 
of K between x 4 and x 7 . But there is another way which is valu- 
able as an example of how one "reads" such an energy diagram. 

Suppose that our particle, with total energy £ 2 , is at the 
point x = x 3 at some instant. Its potential energy U(x 3 ) at this 
point is equal to the total energy, for this is where the curve 
of U(x) and the line E = E 2 intersect. Thus the particle has zero 

382 Energy conservation in dynami.cs 

kinetic energy and hence is instantaneously at rest. However, 
there is a force on it: 

At x = x 3 , dU/dx is negative and hence F(x 3 ) is positive — i.e., 
in the +x direction. Thus the particle accelerates to the right. 
The force on it, and hence its acceleration, decreases as the slope 
of the U(x) curve decreases, falling to zero at the value of x at 
which U(x) is minimum. At this point the speed of the particle 
is a maximum, and as it moves further in the +x direction (with 
d(J/dx > 0) it now experiences a force in the — x direction. The 
diagram displays all this information before us, and shows the 
kinetic energy £ 2 — V continuing to decrease as the particle 
approaches x 4 . Finally, at x 4 itself, the velocity has fallen to zero 
— but there is still a force acting in the -x direction. What hap- 
pens? The particle picks up speed again, traveling to the left, until 
it reaches x 3 with its velocity reduced to zero. This whole cycle 
of motion will continue to repeat itself indefinitely as long as the 
total energy does not decrease. We have, in short, a periodic 
motion, of which we can discern many of the principal features 
without solving a single equation— just by seeing what the 
energy diagram has to tell us. The motion between x 7 and x 8 
is likewise periodic. 

We can dispose of the other possibilities more briefly, having 
indicated the method. For a still higher energy E 3 , two kinds of 
motion are possible; either a periodic motion between X2 and x 5 , 
or the unbounded motion of a particle coming in from large 
values of x, speeding up as it passes x s , then slowing down and 
reversing its direction of motion at x 6 , moving ofT to the right and 
duplicating all the changes of speed on the way in. Finally, for 
the still larger energy E 4 , the only possible motion is unbounded; 
a particle coming in from large values of x, speeding up, slowing 
down, speeding up, slowing down again, and reversing its direc- 
tion of motion at x lt after which it proceeds inexorab!y in the 
direction of ever-increasing x. For each of these motions, the 
speed at any point can be obtained graphically by measuring the 
vertical distance from the appropriate line of constant energy to 
the corresponding point on the potential-energy curve. 

Caution: The curve of U(x) in Fig. 10-7 is almost too graphic. 
It tends to conjure up a picture of a particle sliding down the 
slopes and up the peak Iike a roller coaster. Do not forget that 

383 The energy method for one-dimensional motions 

it is a one-dimensional motion that is the subject of the analysis. 
The vertical scale is energy, and has nothing necessarily to do 
with altitude. 

After this general introduction, let us consider some specific 
examples of one-dimensional motions as analyzed by the energy 


Bouncing ball 

Suppose that a ball, moving along a vertical line, bounces re- 
peatedly on a horizontal floor. Let us first imagine that there is no 
dissipation (loss) of mechanical energy, so that this energy 
remains constant at some value E. 

We shall use>> to denote the position of the center of gravity 
(CG) of the ball, and take y = to be defined by the first contaet 
of the ball with the floor. We shall take this configuration to 
correspond to U = 0. For y > the potential energy of the ball 
is given by 

U(y) = mgy {y > 0) 

Now y = does not, in any real physical situation, represent the 

Fig. 10-8 (a) Energy diagram for a ball bouncing ver- 
lically. (b) Idealizalion of(a) 10 represent a situation in 
wliicli the impaet at y = is completely rigid bu t in 
wlrich there is some dissipation of energy at each bounce. 

384 Energy conservation in dynamics 

lowest point rcached by the CG of the ball. The floor does not 
exert any force on the ball until it (the floor) has been compressed 
slightly. An equivalent remark can be made about the ball. Thus 
the ball certainly moves into the region y < 0. As it does this, 
however, it experiences a positive (upward) force that increases 
extremely rapidly as y becomes more negative, and completely 
overwhelms the (negative) gravitational force that exists, of course, 
at all values of y. This large positive force gives rise to a very steep. 
increase of U(y) with y for y < [see Fig. 10-8(a)]. 

For any given value of the total energy, therefore, the ball 
oscillates between positions y t and y-i as shown in the figure. 
The motion is periodic — that is, there is some well-defined time T 
between successive passages in the same direction of the ball 
through any given point. 

Now in practice y x may be numerically very small compared 
to y 2 - For instance, if a steel ball bounces on a glass plate, we 
might easily have y x of the order of 0.01 cm and y 2 of the order 
of 10 cm. Thus for many purposes we can approximate the plot of 
U(y) against y for y < by a vertical line, coinciding with the 
energy axis of Fig. 10-8(a). This represents the physically unreal 
property of perfect rigidity — an arbitrarily large force is called 
into play for zero deformation. However, if we can justifiably 
use this approximation, then we have a simple quantitative 
description of the situation. The motion is confined to y > 
and is defined by 

i/w, 2 + mgy = E (y> 0) (10-13) 

The maximum height h is, of course, defined by putting v u = 0: 

h = — (10-14) 


To find the period T of the motion we can calculate the time 
for the ball to travel from y = to y = h and then double it. 
That is, we have the following relation : 

[ a / dy 

2 J »=0 Vy 


because the elementary contribution dt to the time of flight is 
equal to dy divided by the speed v y at any given point. 
Now from Eq. (10-13) we have 

385 Some cxamples of the energy mcthod 

O U = ± 

2(£ - mgy) "' 



Taking the positive root, to correspond to upward motion, we 
have, from Eq. (10-15), 

/o L2(£ - ««Oj 

r* r Ti/a 

r=2/ Us-2 — J * 


g7o m/ mg)- y]»« 

We can simplify this by noting that £/wg is just the maximum 
height h [Eq. (10-14)]. Thus we have 

r- J*' * 

/Wo (A->-) 1/2 

This is an elementary integral (change the variable to w = h - y) 
yielding the result 

You will, of course, recognize the correctness of this result from 
the simple kinematic problem of an object falling with constant 
acceleration, and could reasonably object that this is another 
of those cases in which we have used a sledgehammer to kill a 
fly. But it is the method that you should focus attention on, and 
perhaps the use of a familiar example will facilitate this. It 
should not be forgotten that most motions involve varying accel- 
erations, so that the Standard kinematic formulas for motion with 
constant acceleration do not apply. But Eq. (10-15), in which v 
is defined at any point by the energy equation, can be used for any 
one-dimensional motion and can be integrated numerically if 

Before leaving this example, let us use it to illustrate one 
other instructive feature of the energy diagram. We know that 
the total mechanical energy of a bouncing ball does not in fact 
stay constant but decreases quite rapidly. Although there is 
little loss of energy while the ball is in flight, there is a substantial 
loss at each bounce. Figure 10-8(b) shows how this behavior 
can be displayed on the energy diagram. Starting at the point A, 
the history of the whole motion is obtained by following the 
arrows. The successive decreases in the maximum height of 

386 Energy conservation in dynamics 

bounce, and the inevitable death of the motion at y = 0, are quite 
apparent by inspection of the figure. 

Mass on a spring 

There are very many physical systems— not just ordinary me- 
chanical systems, but also atomic systems, and even electrical 
ones— that can be analyzed by analogy with a mass on a spring. 
The reason for this lies in two features: 

1. A mass typifies the property of inertia, which has its 
analogues in diverse systems and which acts as a repository of 
kinetic energy. 

2. A spring represents a means of storing potential energy 
according to a particular law of force that has its counterparts 
in all kinds of physical interactions. 

We have already studied this problem — the problem of the 
harmonic oscillator — in some detail (in Chapter7) as an application 
of Newton's law, but it is well worth analyzing the problem again 
from the standpoint of energy conservation — in part as an illus- 
tration of this method but chiefly because the description in terms 
of energy opens the way to a far wider range of situations. Not 
only does it provide a pattern for the handling of more complex 
oscillatory problems in classical mechanics; it also supplies the 
foundation for formulating equivalent problems in quantum 

Our starting point will again be the restoring force of an 
ideal spring as described by Hooke's law: 

F = -kx (10-16) 

where x is the position of the free end of the spring relative to its 
relaxed position, k the "force constant" of the spring, measurable 
in N/m, and the negative sign gives the direction of the force, 
opposite to the displacement of the free end. No real spring 
obeys this law over more than a limited range. The propertics of a 
real spring can be exprcssed by a graph such as Fig. 10-9(a), 
which represents the force F (x) exerted by the spring as a function 
of its extension x. Within the linear range the potential energy 
stored in the spring is, according to Eq. (10-9), 


0- - j o F{x)dx= + J kxdx = '^- (10-17) 

387 Sonic cxamplcs of the energy melhod 

Fig. 10-9 (a) Restor- 
ing force versus dis- 
placement for a 
spring. (b) Potential- 
energy diagram asso- 
ciated with (a). 
(c) Graph ofapplied 
force versus extension 
in a stalic deformalion 
ofa spring. 

where wc havc chosen U = for x = 0, i.e., when the spring is 
relaxed. Figure 10-9(b) shows this potential energy plotted against 
x. Since the potential-energy change can be calculated as the 
work done by a force F CKl just sufficient to overcome the spring 
force itself, the increase of potential energy in the spring for any 
given increase of extension can be obtained as the area, between 
given limits, under a graph of F cxt against x [sec Fig. 10-9(c)]. 
F^t can be mcasurcd as the force needed to maintain the spring 
at constant extension for various values of x. Outsidc the linear 
region (whose boundaries arc indicated by dashed lines) F(x) can 
be integrated graphically so as to obtain numerically the potential 

388 Energy conservalion in dynamics 


Fig. 10-10 Mechanical hysteresis. 

energy for an arbitrary displacement. 

Before we examine motion under this spring force, let us 
consider briefly what would happen if the spring employcd in our 
example were made of lead, for example. As we compress such a 
spring from its original length, it will exert a force that behaves 
very much in the way shown in Fig. 10-9(a) and by the line OQ 
in Fig. 10-10. However, if we now remove the extcrnal agency, 
the spring will not return to its original length but will acquire a 
permanent deformation represented by point x r in Fig. 10-10. 
Clearly, such a spring exerts a force that is not conservative. 
The value of the force depends not only on the compression but 
also on the past history. At the value x x of the compression in 
Fig. 10-10, we find two values of the force, one as the spring is 
shortened and the other as it is released. This type of behavior 
is called hysteresis and results in dissipation of mechanical energy. 

Let us now consider in more detail the way in which the use of 
the energy diagram helps us to analyze the straight-line motion of 
a harmonic oscillator. In Fig. 10-11 are shown the potential 
energy U = \kx 2 plotted against x, and two different total ener- 
gies, Ei and E 2 . 

For a given energy E\, as we have already discussed, tne 
vertical distance from the horizontal line E x to the curve U = 
%kx 2 for any value of a: is equal to the kinetic energy of the particle 

Fig. 10-11 Energy 
diagram for a spring 
that obeys Hooke's 

389 Somc examplcs of the energy method 

at x. This is maximum at x = 0; at this point all the energy is 
kinetic and the particle attains its maximum speed. The kinetic 
energy and hence the particle speed decreases for positions on 
either side of the equilibrium position O and is reduced to zero 
at the points x = ±.A\. For values of x to the right of +A x or 
to the Ieft of — A i , (Ei — U) becomes negative ; v 2 is negative and 
there exists no real value of v. This is the region into which the 
particle never moves (at least in classical mechanics); thus the 
positions x = ±A i are turning points of the motion, which is 
clearly oscillatory. 

The amplitude A i of the motion is determined by the total 
energy E\. Since the kinetic energy Ki (=£1 — U) is zero at 
x = ±Au we have 

$kAi2 = Ei 


- - (f 

J (10-18) 

For a larger energy, E 2 , the amplitude is larger in the ratio 
(E2/E1) " 2 , but the qualitative features of the motion are the 

It is interesting to note that the general character of the 
motion as inferred from the energy diagram would be the same for 
any potential-energy curve that has a minimum at x = and is 
symmetrical about the vertical axis through this point. All mo- 
tions of this sort are periodic but differ one from the other in 
detail, e.g., the dependence of speed on position and the de- 
pendence of the period on amplitude. Suppose that the period of 
the motion is T. Then for any symmetrical potential-energy dia- 
gram, we can imagine this time divided up into four equal por- 
tions, any one of which contains the essential information about 
the motion. For suppose that, at t = 0, the particle is traveling 
through the point x = in the positive x direction. Let its 
velocity at this instant be called v m — it is the biggest velocity the 
particle will have during its motion. At / = T/4 the particle is 
at its maximum positive displacement (x = +A in Fig. 10-11), 
and u = 0. It then retraces its steps, rcaching* = after a further 
time T/4 and passing through this point with v = — v m . In two 
further intervals T/4 it goes to its extreme negative displacement 
(x = —A) and at / = T is once again passing through the point 

390 Energy conservation in dynarnics 

Fig. 10-12 Sinus- 
oidal variation of 
velocity with timefor 
a particle subjected to 
a restoring force 
proportional to dis- 
placement. The mo- 
tion during the first 
quarter-period suffices 
to define the rest of 
the curve. 

x = O with v = v m . This sequence will repeat itself indefinitely. 
Furthermore, knowing the symmetry of the problem, we could 
construct the complete graph of v against t from a detailed graph 
for the first quarter-period alone (see Fig. 10-12, in which the 
basic quarter period is drawn with a heavier line than the rest). 

In the next section we shall go beyond this rather general 
examination of the mass-spring system, including nonlinear 
restoring forces, and shall redevelop the rest of the detailed 
results that apply to the ideal harmonic oscillator. Before doing 
that, however, we shall consider one more simple example that 
illustrates the usefulness of the energy method. 

Dynamics of a catapult 

The catapult is an ancient and effective device for launching stones 
or other missiles with quite high velocities, by converting the 
potential energy of a stretched elastic cord into the kinetic energy 
of a mass. I n Fig. 10-13(a) we show the essentials of the arrange- 

Fig. 10-13 (a) Initial 
and final stages o f the 
launching of an object 
by a catapult, (b) In- 
termediale state, 
showing the instan- 
taneous force acting. 

391 Somc examples of the energy method 

ment. An elastic cord, of natural (unstretched) length 2/ , is 
attached to fixed supports at the points A and D (A C = CD = 
/ ). An object of mass m is placed at the midpoint of the cord 
and drawn back to point B. When it is released, the object 
travels along the line BC, and at the point C it begins its free 
flight with speed o. 

Let us assume that the cord develops a tension proportional 
to its increase of length. Then we can use Eq. (10-17) to calculate 
the stored energy when the mass is at the initial position, B.- 
Remembering that there arc two segments of cord, each of initial 
length / and stretched length l x , we have 

U = 2 X i*(/i - /o) 2 = Wi - /o) 2 

In the idealization that the cord has negligible mass and thus 
does not drain off any of the elastic energy for its own motion, 
we can equate the final kinetic energy of the projectile to the 
initial potential energy as given above. Thus we have 

\mv* = /c(/i - /o) 2 
and so 



(/i - /o) 

This example displays particularly well the advantage of 
making the calculation with the help of the scalar quantity, energy, 
instead of the vector quantity, force. For suppose we wanted to 
calculate the final velocity of the mass by direct application of 
F = ma. Then, as indicated in Fig. 10-1 3(b), we should have to 
consider the state of affairs at an arbitrary instant when the mass 
was at some point P between B and C such that AP = I. The ten- 
sion in each half of the cord would be k(l - / ), and the instan- 
taneous acceleration would be obtained by resolving these 
tension forces along the line BC: 

m^- = F x = 2k(l - /o) cos d 

This equation for do/dt would then have to be integrated 
between the points B and C. Or, alternatively, we could calculate 
the total work done by the varying force F x along the path BC. In 
either case, this is a far harder road to the final result than is the 
direct application of conservation of mechanical energy. 

392 Energy conservation in dynamics 


We shall now return to the analysis of the oscillatory motion of 
an object attached to a spring that obeys Hooke's law. The 
basic energy equation for a mass on a spring with a restoring 
forcc proportional to displaccmcnt is 

£/»w 2 + \kx 2 = E (10-19) 

where E is some constant value of the total energy. Since v = 
dx/dt, this can be rcwritten as 

hm (4j?\ + £**2 = E (!0-20) 

Equation (10-19) already gives us v as a function of x, but to 
have a full description of the motion we must solve Eq. (10-20) 
so as to obtain x (and hence v) as functions of r. 

Our way of dealing with Eq. (10-20) will appeal to the 
knowledge of trigonometric functions and their derivatives that 
one develops at an early stage of any calculus course. We start 
out by dividing the equation throughout by E. Then we get 

ni (dx\ 2 k_ 
2E\dt/ + 2E 

x2 = 1 (10-21) 

We notice that this is a sum of two terms involving the square of 
a variable (x) and the square of its derivative (with respect to t). 
The sum is equal to 1 . Now we can relate this to a very familiar 
relationship involving trigonometric functions: If 5 = sin •/>, then 



+ s2 = cos2 <p + sin2 p = 1 (10-22) 

Equations (10-21) and (10-22) are exactly similar in form! We 
must be able to match them, term by term: 

2E\dt) W/ 


The second of these is satisfied by putting 

393 The harmonic oscillator by the energy meihod 

X = 

(t)""' - (t)"'*** '">-*> 

What is ^s? We can find it by evaluating dx/dt by differentiation 
of both sides of Eq. (10-24) with respect to t: 

dx = /2EV 
dt \k) 


But the first equation of (10-23) is satisfied by putting 

* m (2g\ V ** m (2£\ U * QM 

dt \m/ d(f> \m) 

Comparing these two expressions for dx/dt we find the following 
condition on <p: 

J = (* Y" - u (10-25) 

dt \m/ 

where w is the angular velocity (also called the circular frequency) 
that we met in our previous solution of the harmonic oscillator 
problem (Ch. 7, p. 226), starting from F = ma. 

Integrating the last equation with respect to t we thus get 

(p = wt + ipo 

where <po is the initial phase. Substituting this expression for <p 
back into Eq. (10-24) then gives us 

x = fejtj sin (co/ + w>) (10-26) 

If we note that (2E/k) u2 is equal to the amplitude A of the motion 
[Eq. (10-18)] we arrive finally at the same equation for x(t) that 
we found in Chapter 7 [Eq. (7-42)]. 

[If you have some prior knowledge of differential equations, 
you may regard our method of solution above as being rather 
cumbersome. You may prefer to proceed at once to the recogni- 
tion that Eq. (10-20) leads to the relationship 



and hence to the following solution by direct integration: 

dx ,2 2.1/2 

di'"* 4 ~ X) 

394 Energy conscrvation in clynamics 



(4» - x2)I/2 

ut + (po = sin -1 i -J 

and so x = A sin (ut + <p ) as before.] 

Equations (10-25) and (10-26) tell us something very remark- 
able indeed: The period of a harmonic oscillalor, as typified by a 
mass on a spring, is complelely independen! ofthe energy or ampli- 
lude ofthe motion — a result that is not true of periodic oscillations 
under any other force law. The physical consequences of this are 
tremendously important. We depend heavily on the use of vibrat- 
ing systems. If the frequency v (defined as the number of complete 
oscillations per second, i.e., l/7"or u/2v) varied significantly with 
the amplitude for a given system, the situation would become 
vastly more complicated. Yet most vibrating systems behave, to 
some approximation, as harmonic oscillators with properties as 
described above. Let us see why. 


There are many situations in which an object is in what we call 
stable equi1ibrium. It is at rest at some point — under no net 
force — but if displaced in any direction it experiences a force 
tending to return it to its original position. Such a force, unless 
it has pathological properties (such as a discontinuous jump in 
value for some negligible displacement) will have the kind of 
variation with position shown in Fig. 10-14(a). The normal 
resting position is marked as x . This force function can be inte- 
grated to give the potential-cnergy graph of Fig. 10-14(b). One 

Fig. 10-14 (a) Varia- 
tion of force with dis- 
placement on either 
side of the equilibrium 
position in a one- 
dimensional system. 
(o) Potential-energy 
curve associated 
with (a). 

395 Small oscillations in general 


Fig. 10-15 Potential-energy curve ofFig. 10-14(b) 
referred to cm origin located at the equilibrium position. 

can then form a mental picture of the object sitting at the bottom, 
as it were, of the potential-energy hollow, the minimum of which 
is at x = x . 

Now wc can fit any curve with a polynomial expansion. Let 
us do this with the potential-energy funetion — but let us do it 
with reference to a new origin chosen at the point x , by putting 

x = xo + s 

where 5 is the displacement from equilibrium. The potential- 
energy curve, now appearing as in Fig. 10-15, can be fitted by 
the following expansion : 

U(s) = U + as + ic 2 s 2 + %c 3 s 3 + 


(The numerical faetors are inserted for a reason that will appear 
almost immediately.) 

The foree as a funetion of s is obtained from the general rela- 

m = _ _ 

so that we have 

F(s) = —Cl — C2S — css 2 ■ ■ ■ 

However, by definition, F(s) = at 5 = 0; this is the equilibrium 
position. Hence c { = 0, and so our equation for F becomes 

F(s) = — C2S — C3S 2 


Now, whatever the relative values of the constants c 2 and c 3 , there 
will always be a rangc of values of s for which the term in s 2 is 
much less than the term in 5, for the ratio of the two is equal to 
Czs/ci, which can be made as small as we please by choosing s 
small enough. A similar argument applies, even more strongly, 
to all the higher terms in the expansion. Hence, unless our po- 
tential-energy funetion has some very special properties (such as 
having c 2 = 0) we can be sure that for sufficicntly small oscilla- 
tions it will be just like the potential-energy funetion of a spring 
that obeys Hookc's law. We can write 

396 Energy conservation in dynamics 

U(s) m %c 2 s 2 (• 0-29) 

which means that the effective spring constant A; for the motion is 
equal to the constant c 2 . We shall discuss a specific application 
of this analysis — molecular vibration — later in this chapter. 


So far, in all our discussions of potential energy, we have analyzed 
the problems as though we had a single object exposed to given 
forces. A statement of our calculation on an object near the earth's 
surface could well be in the form: The polen tial energy ofan object 
of mass m raised to a height h above the earth's surface is mgh. 
Such a statement is perfectly legitimate for situations in which 
the mass of a particle is very small compared to the mass of the 
object (or objects) with which it interacts. In such a case, the center 
of mass of the system is effectively determined by the position of 
the larger mass. A frame of reference anchored to this larger 
mass is both a zero-momentum frame and a fixed frame of refer- 
ence. This is the case for the earth and an ordinary object moving 
near its surface. It is also the case for interactions between 
any two objects if one of them is rigidly attached to the earth. 
One must remember, however, that, strictly speaking, one is 
analyzing a two-body system (the earth and the object which is 
raised): mgh is the increase of potential energy of the system when 
the separation between the earth and the object of mass m is 
increased by an amount h. I n other words, the potential energy is 
a property of the two objects jointly ; it cannot be associated with 
one or the other individually. If one has two interacting particles 
of comparable mass, both will accelerate and gain or lose kinetic 
energy as a result of the interaction between them. It is to this 
basic two-body aspect of the potential-energy problem that we 
now turn. 

Suppose that we have two particles, of masses m, and m 2 , 
connected by a spring of negligible mass aligned parallel to the x 
axis (Fig. 10-16). Let the particles be at positions x t and x 2 , as 
shown, referred to some origin O. If the spring is effectively 
massless, the forces on it at its two ends must be equal and oppo- 
site (otherwise it would have infinite acceleration) and hence, 
accepting the equality of action and reaction in the contacts 
between the masses and the spring, the forces exerted on the 
masses are also equal and oppositc. Thus, denoting the force 

397 The linear oscillator as a two-body problem 

Fig. 10-16 System 
of two masses con- 
nected by a spring, 
showing ihe separale 
coordinates and 





m 2 

F, 2 









exerted on mass 2 by the spring as F x 2 , the force F 2 i exerted on 
mass 1 by the spring is equal to — F 12 . 

We shall relate the changes in kinetic energy of the masses 
to the changes in stored potential energy in the spring. 

The potential energy of the spring 

First, suppose that m i moves a distance dx\ while m 2 moves dx 2 - 
The work done by the spring is given by 

dW = Fi2dx2 + F2 1 dx\ 

= Fi2(dx2 — dx\) (sinceF2i = — Fia) 

- Fi 2 d(,X2 - Xl) 

Clearly the difference x 2 — x x , rather than x x and x 2 separately, 
defines the elongation of the spring (and hence the energy stored 
in it). Let us introduce a special coordinate, r, to denote this: 

r = X2 — x\ 


dW = F 12 dr (work done by spring) 


The change of potential energy of the spring is equal to —dW. 
Introducing the potential energy function U(r) we have 

dU = - F12 dr 

(r)= - J F 12 dr 


The kinetic energy of the masses 

Our discussion of two-body systems in Chapter 9 suggests clearly 
that we should introduce the ccntcr of mass of the system and 
refer the motions of the individual masses to it. This allows us, 
as we have seen, to consider the dynamics in the CM frame with- 

398 Energy conscrvalion in dynamics 

out reference to the motion of the system as a whole. By Eq. 
(9-29) we have 

K = K' + £A/£5 2 

where K' is the total kinetic energy of the two masses as measured 
in the CM frame. Denoting the velocities relative to the CM by 
v[ and u' 2 as usual, we have 

K' = imivf + \mv£ (10-32) 

We have seen (pp. 338-339) that it is very convenient to express 
K' in terms of the relative velocity, v„ and the reduced mass, y., 
of the two particles: 

V r = V2 — f'l 


M = 

From the definition of the CM (zero-momentum) frame, we have 

mio'i + /«2^2 = 

Using this, together with the equation for v T , we find 

, w»2 , mi 

m = ; v, 02 = 

; U T f 2 = "r 

m\ + n\2 "'i + "i2 

Substituting these values into Eq. (10-32) one arrives once again 
at the result expressed by Eq. (9-30a): 

r.JJHL«l-i P»r* 00-33) 

2mi + n\2 

We shall be considering the changes of kinetic energy of the 
masses as related to the work done on them by the spring. On 
the assumption that no external forces are acting, we have B = 
const., in which case 

dK = dK' 

The motions 

At this point we can assemble the foregoing results and equate 
the change of kinetic energy to the work done by the spring. We 
evaluated dW [in Eq. (10-30)] in terms of laboratory coordinates, 
although, as we saw (and could have predicted), the result depends 
only onxa — Xi, which is equal to x' 2 — x[ — both being equal 

399 The linear oscillator as a two-body problem 

to the relative coordinate r. Likewise, as we have just seen, 
dK = dK'. We can, in fact, put 

dK' = F\zdr (work done by spring) 


K' = / F l2 dr + const. 

And now, with the help of Eq. (10-31), we can write this as a 
statement of the total mechanical energy E' in the CM frame: 

K' + U(r) = E' (10-34) 

For the specific case of a spring of spring constant k and natural 
length r , we can put 

r = r + s 
U(s) = $ks2 


dr ds 

Thus the equation of conservation of energy [Eq. (10-34)] 

J* (f) +ito8-i? 00-35) 



M = 

mi + m 2 

This is exactly of the form of the linear oscillator equation; its 
angular frequcncy w and its period T are given by 

-- ($)"* r - 2 *(?r (, °- 36) 

It is to be noted that the reduced mass /x is less than either of the 
individual masses, so that for a given spring the period is shorter i n 
free oscillation than if one of the masses is clamped tight. 


With the help of the analysis developed in the last section, we can 

400 Energy conservation in dynamics 

gain further insight into certain inelastic or explosive collisions 
of the type discussed in Chapter 9. 

We shall introduce the problem by imagining a little me- 
chanical gadget that could be constructed without much trouble. 
The gadget is a spring equipped with a buffer that slides along a 
guide and becomes lockcd iri place if the spring is compressed by 
more than a certain amount [see Fig. 10-17(a)]. Suppose that 
this device (assumed to be of negligible mass) is attached to an 
object of mass m 2 , and that an object of mass m t collides with it. 
For simplicity, let us take m 2 to be initially stationary, and let 
mi approach it with a speed «i. 

If Mi is small, the collision is perfectly elastic. The spring 
will be compressed a little when m^ strikes it, but it will return 
to its original unstretched condition, and at this instant the col- 
lision process comes to an end. Throughout the time that the 
spring is at all compressed, the mass m 2 is subjected to an accelera- 
tive force to the right and m i is subjected to a decelerative force 
to the left. A certain positive amount of work is done onm 2 
and an equal amount of negative work is done on m\. The total 
kinetic energy is the same after the collision as beforehand, but 
it has been reapportioned. 

If ui is increased, the situation is finally reached in which 
the maximum compression of the spring just brings it to the 
locking position. At this instant mi and m 2 are at rest relative 
to one another, and because the spring is prevented from pushing 
them apart again, this is the way they remain. In other words, 
they would continue to move on as a single composite object of 
mass mi + m 2 ; the collision has suddenly become completely 

Fig. 10-17 (a) Collision inooking one object with an 
energy-storage device. (b) Same collision in the center- 
of-mass frame. The collision is elastic if the total ki- 
netic energy in this frame is less than the work needed 
to compress the spring by the crilical amount. 

401 Collision processes involving energy storage 

What defines the critical condition at which the collision 
changes from elastic to inelastic? We can most easily discuss this 
from the standpoint of the CM frame [Fig. 10-17(b)]. In this 
frame the masses have a total kinetic energy given (cf. the previous 
section) by 

K' = ivu> T 2 


u = - — — v T = — "i (because uz = 0) 

m\ + n\2 

If we denote the initial kinetic energy of m x in the Lab frame 
as Ku we can put 

mi + m2 

Now at the critical value of K x all the energy K' is used up in 
compressing the spring to the Iocking position; this requires a 
well-defined amount of work equal to the energy, U , stored in 
the spring in this configuration. Thus we can put 

K' = m 2 K, = f/o 


_ mi + m 2 Uq (10 _ 37) 


If U is given, the above equation defines a threshold value ofKu 
at which inelastic collisions become possible and below which 
the collisions can only be elastic. 

If we consider still higher values of K u we obtain situations 
in which the spring is compressed beyond its Iocking point but 
then returns to that critical length and stops. During this partial 
reextension it pushes m i and m 2 apart, giving them a final relative 
velocity and a kinetic energy of relative motion in the CM frame. 
The collision is still inelastic but only partially so. A well-defined 
amount (C/ ) of the originally kinetic energy of the colliding 
masses has been locked up in the spring, and the dynamics of the 
collision can be analyzed in these terms. Our analysis in Chapter 9 
of inelastic and explosive collisions was, in fact, made precisely 
in this way. The quantity Q, representing the value of K/ - K 
that we introduced there (p. 347) is in this case simply equal to 

402 Energy conservation jn dynamics 

The purely classical dynamical situation described above is 
closely paralleled by many collision processes in atomic and 
nuclear physics, in which an incident particle (e.g., an electron 
or a proton) strikes a stationary target particle that has various 
sharply defined states of higher internal energy than its normal 
"ground state." The sharpness and discreteness of these charac- 
teristic states is understood in terms of quantum theory, but all 
that we need here is the knowledge of their existence. If a study 
is made of the distribution of kinetic energies of the electrons or 
protons after they have collided with target particles of a given 
species, the results give information about the excited energy 
levels involved. Some examples of this kind of analysis are shown 
in Fig. 10-18. The higher the bombarding energy of the incident 
particle, the larger the number of excited states that can be stim- 
ulated and detected in this way. Figure 10-18(a) shows data 
from the scattering of electrons by helium atoms, and Fig. 
10— 18(b) shows some results for the scattering of protons by the 
nucleus boron 10. In the former case the target particle is so 
massive that the available kinetic energy in the CM (K') is 
insignificantly different from the electron energy K\. In the 
latter case, however, the center-of-mass effect is considerable 
and one must use Eq. (10-37) to infer the excitation energy U 
from the threshold value of Ki> One important difference between 
these atomic or nuclear scattering processes and the classical 
ones is that perfectly elastic collisions may still occur, with a 
certain probability, even after the threshold energy for inelastic 
processes has been exceeded. This is an example of the general 
feature of quantum mechanics that one only has relative proba- 
bilities of events when several outcomes are possible. 

To return briefly to the classical situations once again, one 
can of course imagine mechanisms that would provide for an 
increase rather than a decrease of kinetic energy as the result of a 
collision. One could, for example, have a spring already com- 
pressed that would be released if a trip mechanism were activated 
by the initial impact. Such a process — an explosive collision — 
would, like the inelastic collision with energy storage, require a 
certain minimum threshold energy to make it go. Something very 
comparable to this happens with chemical explosive systems that 
require the firing of a detonator. It is possible to do a quantitative 
experiment in which a simple percussion cap (as used in a child's 
toy pistol) is mounted on a mass that is free to recoil, and is deto- 
nated by the impact of an incident object (e.g., on an air track). 

403 Collision processes involving energy storage 

180 190 

Scattered electron energy, e' 


">B<0.72 MeV) 

Elastic scattering peak • 
w B*(2.15MeV) 

•"B*(1.74 MeV) 




~ nJll 

250 300 

Relative proton momentum, units of Br 


Fig. 10-18 Experimental resulls on elastic and inelastic collision pro- 
cesses, showing Ihe production of characteristic excited states ofsharply 
defined energy: (a) Scattering of electrons by neutral helium atoms. 
[AfterL. C. Van Alta, Phys. Rev., 38, 876 (1931).] (b) Scattering of 
protons by nuclei of boron 10. Some carbon was also present as an 
unavoidable contaminant. [After C. K. Bockelman, C. P. Browne, 
W. W. Buechner, and A. Sperdmo, Phys. Rcv., 92, 665 (1953).] 

404 Energy conservation in dynainics 

The threshold kinetic energy required under these conditions is 
significantly greater than if the cap is mounted on an unyielding 


The diatomic molecule, as typified by such molecules as HC1 
or Cl 2 , is a system to which the methods developed in this chapter 
can be very effectively applied. In such molecules, the atomic 
nuclei play the role of point masses (which of course they are to 
an extremely good approximation, being so tiny in comparison 
to an atomic diameter) and the outer clectron structure of the 
atoms plays the role of a spring system that can store potential 
energy. We thus have the physical basis for characteristic vibra- 
tions of the nuclei along the line joining them, and this will be a 
possible mode of internal motion of the molecule. Before discussing 
the oscillations as such, we must considcr the shape and energy 
scale of the potential energy curve for a molecule of this type. 

We begin with the knowledge that in a diatomic molecule 
there is a fairly well defined distance betwecn the nuclei of the 
two atoms. This is called the bond length and is always of the 
order of 1 angstrom (10 -10 m). The fact that such an equilibrium 
distance exists implies that the potential-energy function U(r) 
has a minimum at the separation r equal to the bond length. 
One way of defining such a potential, while still leaving plenty 
of room for empirical adjustment of the constants to experi- 
mental data, is to assume the following potential-energy function: 

U(r) = d _ * (10-38) 

where A and B are positivc constants, and a and b are suitably 
chosen positive exponents with a > b. The term A/r" is a 
positive potential energy that falls away rapidly with increasing 
distance and represents a rcpulsive force. The term - B/r 6 is a 
negative potential energy, also falling off with increasing r but less 
rapidly than the first term, and it represents an attractive force. 
These funetions, and the U(r) curve obtained by adding them, 
are shown in Fig. 10-19. 

Now from Eq. (10-38) we can define the equilibrium dis- 

■The remainder of this chapter can be omitled without loss of continuity, 
but it does introduce some quile interesting fcatures in addition to the atomic 
physics as such. 

405 The diatomic molecule 

Fig. 10-19 Simple 
model oflhe potential- 
energy diagram ofa 
dialomic molecule, 
defining an eguilib- 
rium separation ro of 
the nuclei. 

tance; it is the distance at which dU/dr = 0: 


aA bB 

f<>+\ ' fi + 1 

At r = r , we have 



r " 



If r o is experimentally known, this defines one connection between 
the parameters A, B, a, and b. Also, at r = r , the potential 
energy is given by 

and substituting for A/r a from Eq. (10-40), this gives 


The energy U(r ) is a measurable quantity, for if we are to 
dissociate the molecule completely we must add a quantity of 
energy, the dissociation energy D, equal and opposite to U(r ) 
(cf. Fig. 10-19). It is typically a few eV. Thus we can put 

406 Energy conservaiion in dynamics 



Equations (10-40) and (10-41) can be used to narrow down 
the choice of parameters — we have two equations and four 
unknowns. Clearly, however, we must either appeal to some 
further, independent information, or make some specific assump- 
tions, or both, to have a quantitatively defined situation. 

The molecular spring constant 

The quantity we really need to know, for the purpose of con- 
sidering molecular vibrations, is the effective spring constant of 
the molecule for small displacements from equilibrium. We dis- 
cussed this situation in general terms earlier in this chapter 
(p. 395), and arrived at the result [Eq. (10-29)] 

t/(s) « \C2S 2 


s = r — ro 

The constant c 2 can be identified with spring constant k and can 
be deduced from the given form of U (r): 


Applying this to the present problem, we shall differentiate both 
sides of Eq. (10-39) with respect to r: 

d 2 U _ a(a+\)A b(b + \)B 

d r 2 ~ r o+2 r 6+2 UW"«J 

This Iooks complicated, but for the particular value r = r 
we can reduce it to one term with the help of Eq. (10-40): 

(d 2 V\ = a+ 1 bB _ 6(AJ 

+ \)B 


This still looks rather forbidding, but if you compare Eq. (10-44) 
407 The diatomic molecule 

with Eq. (10-41) you will see that the equation for the dissociation 
energy D contains a very similar combination of factors, and 
taking D as known we can greatly simplify our statement of the 
value of k, as follows. From Eq. (10-41) we have 

(a - b)B 

= aD 

Substituting this result in Eq. (10-44) we find 

k = 


ro 2 


Beyond this point we cannot go, even with a knowledge of 
D and r , without assigning a value to the product ab which can 
be taken to play the role of a single adjustable parameter, so that 
we content oursclves with a final semiempirical equation: 

k = C- 

r 2 


where C is an empirical constant (=ab) greater than unity. 

Fig. 10-20 Empirical potential-energy diagram for the 
molecule HCI, based on the Morse potential, with ener- 
gies expressed in wave numbers (cm~ '). 

408 Energy conscrvaiion in dynamics 

Actually a quite different analytic form of the potential 
function finds favor with spectroscopists. It is known as the 
Morse potential (after P. M. Morse). It has the same general 
features as the one we have used (see Fig. 10-20) but is based on a 
difference of exponentials rather than of simple powers of r. 
Like the one we have used, it has adjustable constants that can be 
deduced from spectroscopic data. Indeed, once the theory of 
molecular vibrations has been set up, one uses observations to 
feed back the numerical values into the theoretical formulas. 
It is a two-way traffic, in other words. Notice the unfamiliar 
units (cm -1 ) on the ordinate of Fig. 10-20; we shall be coming 
back to them shortly. 

The molecular vibrations 

The period of vibration of a diatomic molecule with atoms of 
masses /«i and m 2 is given by combining Eqs. (10-36) and 


T=2xr (-£-) (10-46) 

where/i = reduced mass = m\m%l(jn\ + m 2 ). The frequency v, 
in vibrations per second, proves to be a more interesting quantity: 


Let us see what this equation might suggest with an actual mole- 
cule. We shall take carbon monoxide (CO) for which the follow- 
ing data apply: 

/m( l2 C) = 12amu = 2.0 X 10- 2C kg 
m 2 ( lc O) = 16amu = 2.7 X 10 -26 kg 

r « 1.1 A- 1.1 X lO-^m 1 

D« lOeV = 1.6 X K) -18 ^ 

First we have 

_ _m 1 m 3 _ _ 12 x 2? x ]0 _ 20kg _ j 16 x 1() _ 2 o kg 

/Mi ■+- M»2 ^o 

'These values come from a tabulation of molecular constants in the 
Smithsonian Physical Tables (published by the Smithsonian Institution, 
Washington, D.C.) 

409 Tlic diatomic molecule 


D I y. « 1.4 X 10 8 m 2 /sec 2 

j- « 1.7 X lO^C'^sec- 1 
If we ignored the factor C 1 ' 2 , we would have 

► *1.7X 10 13 sec-' 

Since molecular vibrations are studied mainly through spectros- 
copy and the measurement of wavelengths of absorbed or emitted 
radiation, let us calculate the wavelength X corresponding to v: 

The visible spectrum extends from about 4.5 X 10 -7 m to 
7 X 10 -7 m, so the wavelength we have calculated would be well 
into the infrared. That is exactly where we find the spectral lines 
associated with molecular vibrations. Actually there is a funda- 
mental vibrational line of CO with a wavelength of about 4.7 X 
10 -6 m— about one quarter of the value we have just calculated. 
We would have obtained this value by putting C" 2 = 4 in 
Eq. (10-47). This value of C could correspond, for example, to 
having a = 5 and b = 3 in the original expression for U(r) 
[Eq. (10-38)]. This specific form of potential would result from 
a short-range repulsive force varying as l/r°, and a longer-range 
attractive force varying as l/r 4 . We should emphasize, however, 
that our model of the potential is a very crude one and should not 
be regarded as a source of precise information about intramolecu- 
lar forces. Our purpose in introducing it is simply to illustrate 
the general way in which vibrations about an equilibrium con- 
figuration can be analyzed. 

There is a feature — a vital feature — that we have ignored; 
this is that molecular vibration, and the radiation associated 
with it, is quantized. The energy of a quantum of the radiation 
is hv (where h is Planck's constant) and is provided by a transition 
between two sharply defined energy states of the molecule: 

hv = Ex - E 2 (10-48) 

We shall not go into this here, except to point out that the smallest 
possible jump between successive vibrational energy levels does, 

410 Energy conservation in dynamics 

as it happens, correspond exactly to the classical oscillator fre- 
quency we have calculated. It is the basic quantum nature of the 
process, as expressed in Eq. (10-48), that makes the frequency v 
rather than the wavelength X the important quantity. Since, 
however, spectroscopists measure wavelengths in the first instance, 
and since v is inversely proportional to X, there is a custom of 
giving results in terms of X - 1 simply. To convert this to an equiva- 
lent energy measurement we must use the relation, applying 
to any photon, that 

E = hv = hc\~ l 

This scheme of units has been extended still further, and used 
in spectroscopy as a measure of energies generally, whether or 
not photon emission is involved. For example, in Fig. 10-20, 
the dissociation energy D of HC1 is given as 

D = 36,300 cm- 1 = 3.63 X 10 6 m" 1 

Using the above relation, and substituting h 
J-sec, we have in this case 

D = (6.62 X 10" 34 )(3 X 10 8 )(3.63 X 10°) 
= 7.2 X 10- "J 
= 4.5 eV (approx.) 

6.62 X 10- 34 


10 — / A particle of mass m, at rest at t = 0, is subjected to a force 
F whose value at / = is Fq and which decreases linearly with time, 
becoming zero at t = T. What is the kinetic energy of the particle 
at t = r? 

10-2 An object of mass 5 kg is acted on by a force that varies with 
the position of the object as shown. If the object starts out from rest 
at the point x = 0, what is its speed (a) at x = 25 m, and (b) at 
x = 50 m? 

41 1 Problems 

10-3 (a) A particle of mass m, initially at rest, is acted upon by a 
force F which increases linearly with time: F = Cl. Deduce the 
relationship between F and the particle's position x, and graph your 

(b) How is the graph of F versus x altered if the particle has 
initial velocity uo? 

10-4 (a) Since antiquity man has made use of the "mechanical 
advantage" of simple machines, defined as the ratio of the load that 
is to be raised to the applied force that can raise it. By analyzing the 
work-energy relation dW = F • t/s, and appealing to conservation of 
energy, give a reasoned definition of "mechanical advantage." 

(b) In terms of your definition, calculate the particular "me- 
chanical advantage" offered by each of the devices shown. 

Radius b 

10-5 (a) The Stanford linear accelerator ("SLAC") delivers energy 
to electrons at the rate of approximately 200 IceV/ft. How does this 
compare to the energy per unit length imparted to electrons by a 
cathode-ray tube? By a television tube? 

(b) The effects of relativity are extremely pronounced in this 
examplc (after 2 miles of travel, the electrons in SLAC attain a velocity 
that is within 10 _7 % that of light). How far would the electrons 
travel in attaining the speed of light if their kinetic energy were given 
by the classical value KE = £mo 2 ? 

10-6 A railroad car is loaded with 20 tons of coal in a time of 2 sec 
while it travels through a distance of 10 m beneath a hopper from 
which the coal is dischargcd. 

412 Energy conservation in dynamics 

(a) What average extra force must be applied to the car during 
this loading process to keep it moving at constant speed? 

(b) How much work does this force perform? 

(c) What is the increase in kinetic energy of the coal? 

(d) Explain the discrepancy between (b) and (c). 

10-7 A car is being driven along a straight road at constant speed v. 
A passenger in the car hurls a ball straight ahead so that it leaves 
his hand with a speed u relatiue to him. 

(a) What is the gain of energy of the ball as measured in the 
reference frame of the car? Of the road? 

(b) Relate the answers in (a) to the work done by the passenger 
and by the car. Satisfy yourself that you understand exactly what 
forces are acting on what objects, over what distances. 

10-8 A common device for measuring the power output of an engine 
at a given rate of revolution is known as an absorption dynamometer. 
A small friction brake, called a Prony brake, is clamped to the output 
shaft of the engine (as shown), allowing the shaft to rotate, and is 
held in position by a spring scale a known distance R away. 

(a) Derive an expression for the horsepower of the engine in 
terms of the quantities R, F (the force recordcd at the spring scale), 
and 03 (the angular velocity of the shaft). 

(b) You will recognize the product of the force F times its lever 
arm R as the torque exerted by the engine. Does your relation between 
torque and horsepower agree with the data published for automobile 
engines? Explain why there may be discrepancies. 

10-9 An electric pump is used to empty a flooded basemcnt which 
measures 30 by 20 ft and is 15 ft high. In a rainstorm, the basement 
collected water to a depth of 4 ft. 

(a) Find the work necessary to pump the water out to ground 

(b) Supposing that the pump was driven by a 1-hp motor with 
a 50% efficiency, how Iong did the operation take? 

(c) If the depth of basement below ground werc 50 ft instead 
of 15 ft, how much work would be required of the pump, again for 
a 4-ft flood? 

413 Problems 

10-10 (a) Look up the current world records for shot put, discus, 
and javelin. The masses of these objects are 7.15, 2.0, and 0.8 kg, 
respectively. Ignoring air resistance, calculate the minimum possible 
kinetic energy imparted to each of these objects to achieve these 
record throws. 

(b) What force, exertcd over a distance of 2 m, would be re- 
quired to impart these energies? 

(c) Do you think that the answers imply that air resistance 
imposes a serious limitation in any of these events? 

10-11 A perverse traveler walks down an ascending escalator, so as 
to remain always at the same vertical level. Does the motor driving 
the escalator have to do more work than if the man were not there? 
Analyze the dynamics of this situation as fully as you can. 

10-12 The Great Pyramid of Gizeh when first erected (it has since 
lost a certain amount of its outermost layer) was about 150 m high 
and had a square base of edge length 230 m. It is effectively a solid 
block of stone of density about 2500 kg/m 3 . 

(a) What is the total gravitational potential energy of the 
pyramid, taking as zero the potential energy of the stone at ground 

(b) Assume that a slave employed in the construction of the 
pyramid had a food intake of about 1500Cal/day and that about 
10% of this energy was available as useful work. How many man-days 
would have been required, at a minimum, to construct the pyramid? 
(The Greek historian Herodotus reported that the job involved 
100,000 men and took 20 years. If so, it was not very efficient.) 

10-13 It is claimed that a rocket would rise to a greater height if, 
instead of being ignited at ground level (A), it were ignited at a lower 
level (B) after it had been allowed to slide from rest down a friction- 
less chute — see the figure. To analyze this claim, consider a simplified 
model in which the body of the rocket is represented by a mass M, 
the fuel is represented by a mass m, and the chemical energy released 
in the burning of the fuel is represented by a compressed spring be- 
tween M and m which stores a definite amount of potential energy, U, 
sufficient to eject m suddenly with a velocity V relative to M. (This 

414 Energy corrservation. in dynamics 

corresponds to instantaneous burning and ejection of all the fuel — 
i.e., an explosion.) Then proceed as follows: 

(a) Assuming a value of g independent of height, calculate 
how high the rocket would rise if fired directly upward from rest at A. 

(b) Let B be at a distance h vertically lower than A, and suppose 
that the rocket is fired at B after sliding down the frictionless chute. 
What is the velocity of the rocket at B just before the spring is re- 
leased? just after the spring is released? 

(c) To what height above A will the rocket rise now? Is this 
higher than the earlier case? By how much? 

(d) Remembering energy conservation, can you answer a 
skeptic who claimed that someone had been cheated of some energy? 

(e) If you are ambitious, consider a more realistic case in which 
the ejection of the fuel is spread out over some appreciable time. 
Assume a constant rate of ejection during this time. 

10-14 A neutral hydrogen atom falls from rest through 100 m in 
vacuum. What is the order of magnitude of its kinetic energy in 
electron oolts at the bottom? (1 eV = 1.6 X 10 -19 J. Avogadro's 
number = 6 X 10 23 .) 

10-15 A spring exerts a restoring force given by 

F(x) = -kiX- k 2 x* 

where x is the deviation from its unstretched length. The spring rests 
on a frictionless surface, and a frictionless block of mass m and initial 
velocity v hits a spike on the end of the spring and sticks (see the 
figure). How far does the mass travel, after being impaled, before it 
comes to rest? (Assume that the mass of the spring is negligible.) 

10-16 A particle moves along the x axis. Its potential energy as a 
function of position is as shown in the figure. Make a careful freehand 
sketch of the force F(x) as a function of x for this potential-energy 
curve. Indicate on your graph significant features and relationships. 

415 Problcms 



/0-77 A uniform rope of mass M and length L is draped symmet- 
rically ovcr a frictionless horizontal peg of radius R. It is thcn dis- 
turbed slightly and begins to slide off the peg. Find the speed of the 
rope at the instant it leaves the peg completely. 

10-18 Two masses are connected by a massless spring as shown. 

(a) Find the minimum downward force that must be exerted 
on m\ such that the entire assembly will barely leave the table when 
this force is suddenly removed. 

(b) Consider this problem in the time-reversed situation: Let 
the assembly bc supported abovc the table by supports attached tonil. 
Lower the system until m z barely touches the table and then release 
the supports. How far will m\ drop bcfore coming to a stop? Does 
knowledge of this distance help you solve the original problem? 

(c) Now that you have the answer, check it against your in- 
tuilion by (1) letting mz be zero and (2) letting mi be zero. Espccially 
in the second case, does the theoretical answer agree with your common 
sense? If not, discuss possible sources of error. 

10-19 A particle moves in a region where the potential energy is 
given by 

U(x) = 3x 2 - x 3 (x in m, U in J) 

(a) Sketch a freehand graph of the potential for both positive 
and negative values of x. 

(b) What is the maximum value of the total mechanical energy 
such that oscillatory motion is possible? 

(c) In what range(s) of values of x is the force on the particle 
in the positive x direetion ? 

10-20 A highly elastic ball (e.g., a "Superball") is released from rest 
a distance // above the ground and bounces up and down. With each 
bounce a fraelion /of its kinetic energy just before the bounce is lost. 
Estimate the length of time the ball will continue to bounce if h = 5 m 
and / = rtf. 

10-21 The elastic cord of the catapult shown in the diagram has a 
total relaxed length of 2/ ; its ends are attached to fixed supports a 
distance 2b apart. 

416 Energy conservation in dynamics 

(a) Show that if the tcnsion developed in the cord is propor- 
tional to the increase in its length, the component of force in the x 
direction is 

F» = 2kb \-}— n - -r-sr J cos 
\sin 6 sin O / 

(b) Noting that the position of the stone in the catapult is 
given by x = —b cot 6, derive the expression for the work done in 
moving a distance dx. Then integrate this expression between do and 9 
to find the total work done in extending the catapult and compare 
with the result that is obtainable directly by considering the energy 
stored in the strctched cord (p. 392). (After carrying out the calculation 
in the way prescribed above, you will better appreciate the advantages 
that may come from the use of energy conservation instead of a work 
integral that involves the force explicitly.) 

10-22 A perfectly rigid ball of mass M and radius r is dropped upon 
a deformable floor which exerts a force proportional to the distance 
of deformation, F = ky. 

(a) Make a graph of the potential energy of the ball as a func- 
tion of height y. (Take y = as the undisturbed floor level.) 

(b) What is the equilibrium position of the center of the ball 
when the ball is simply resting on the floor? (Note that this corre- 
sponds to the minimum of the potential-energy curve.) 

(c) By how much is the period of M increased over its period 
of bouncing on a perfectly rigid floor? 

10-23 A particle of mass m = 2 kg on a frictionless table is at rest 
at time f = at position x = 0. A force of magnitude F x = 4 sin(ir/) 
newtons acts on the particle from / = to t = 2 sec. 

(a) Plot the resulting acceleration a x , velocity o„ and position 
x as functions of t in this period. 

(b) What is the total work done by the force during the period 
t = Otot = 1 sec? 

10-24 A spring of negligible mass exerts a restoring force given by 

F(x) = -kix + k 2 x 2 

(a) Calculate the potential energy stored in the spring for a 
displacement x. Take U = at x = 0. 

(b) It is found that the stored energy for x = — b is twice the 
stored energy for x = +b. What is ki in terms of Ari and bt 

(c) Sketch the potential-energy diagram for the spring as defined 
in (b). 

(d) The spring lies on a smooth horizontal surface, with one 
end fixed. A mass m is attached to the other end and sets out at x = 
in the positive x direction with kinetic energy equal to k ib' 2 /2. How 

417 Problems 





fast is it moving at x = +6? 

(e) What are the values of x at the extreme ends of (he range 
of oscillation? [Use your graph from part (c) for this.] 

10-25 An object of mass m, moving from the region of negative x, 
arrives at the point x = with speed vo. For x > it experiences a 
force given by 

F(x) = -ax 2 

How far along the +x axis does it get? 

10-26 The potential energy of a particle of mass m as a function of 
its position along the x axis is as shown. (The discontinuous jumps in 
the value of U are not physically realistic but may be assumed to 
approximate a real situation.) Calculate the period of one complete 
oscillation if the particle has a total mechanical energy E equal to 

2t/„ — i 


10-27 Consider an object of mass m constrained to travel on the x axis 
(perhaps by a frictionless guide wire or frictionless tracks), atlached 
to a spring of relaxed length /o and spring constant k which has its 
other end fixed at x = 0, y ■ / (see the figure). 

(a) Show that the force exerted on m in the x direction is 

~- kx [ l -( l+ $) 

(b) For small displacements (x « /o), show that the force is 
proportional to x 8 and hence 

U{x) ~ Ax* (x « /o) 

What is A in terms of the above constants? 

(c) The period of a simple harmonic oscillator is independent 
of its amplitude. How do you think the period of oscillation of the 
above motion will depend on the amplitude? (An energy diagram 
may be helpful.) 

10-28 Consider a particle of mass m moving along the x axis in a 

418 Energy conservation in dynamics 

force field for which the potenlial energy of the particle is given by 
U = Ax 2 + Bx* (A > 0, B > 0). Draw the potential-energy curve 
and, arguing from the graph, determine something about the de- 
pendence of the period of oscillation T upon the amplitude xo- Show 
that, for amplitudes sufficiently small so that Bx A is always very small 
compared to Ax i , the approximate dependence of period upon ampli- 
tude is given by 

,_ A (i-g„) 

10-29 A particle of mass m and energy E is bouncing back and forth 
between vertical walls as shown, i.e., over a region where U = 0. 
The potential energy is slightly changed by introducing a tiny rec- 
tangular hump of height AU (« E) and width Ax. Show that the 
period of oscillation is changed by approximately (m/2£ 3 ) 1/2 (Ai/AAr). 
[It is worth noting that the effect of the small irregularity in potential 
energy depends simply on the product of AU and Ax, not on the 
individual values of these quantities. This is typical of such small 
disturbing effects — known technically as perturbations.] 

U t - 

U = 

10-30 Two blocks of masses m and 2m rest on a frictionless horizontal 
table. They are connected by a spring of negligible mass, equilibrium 
length L, and spring constant k. By means of a massless thread 
connecting the blocks the spring is held compressed at a length L/2. 
The whole system is moving with speed y in a direction perpendicular 
to the length of the spring. The thread is then burned. In terms of m, 
L, k, and o find 

(a) The total mechanical energy of the system. 

(b) The speed of the center of mass. 

(c) The maximum relative speed of the two blocks. 

(d) The period of vibration of the system. 

How do the quantities of parts (a) through (d) change if the initial 
velocity c is along, rather than perpendicular to, the length of the 

10-31 The mutual potential energy of a Li + ion and an I - ion as a 
function of their separation r is expressed fairly well by the equation 

419 Problems 

-Ke 2 . A 

£/(,) = __ + __ 

where the first term arises from the Coulomb interaction, and the 
values of its constants in MKS units are 

K = 9 X 10 9 N-m 2 /C 2 , e = 1.6 X KT 19 C 

The equilibrium distance ro between the centers of these ions in the 
Lil molecule is about 2.4 A. On the basis of this information, 

(a) How much work (in eV) must be done to tear these ions 
completely away from each other? 

(b) Taking the I - ion to be fixed (because it is so massive), 
what is the frequency v (i n Hz) of the Li + ion in vibrations of very 
small amplitude? (Calculate the effective spring constant k as the 
value of d 2 U/dr 2 at r = ro — see p. 407. Take the mass of the Li + 
as 10- 26 kg.) 

10-32 (a) If in addition to the van der Waals attractive force, which 
varies as r -7 , two identical atoms of mass M experience a repulsive 
force proportional to r - ' with / > 7, show that 

"W-7T + I <" >6 > 

and graph your result versus r. 

(b) Calculate the equilibrium separation ro in this molecule in 
terms of the constants by requiring 




(c) The dissociation energy D of the molecule should be equal to 
— t/(r ). What is its value in terms of A, n, and r ? 

(d) Calculate the frequency of small vibrations of the molecule 
about the equilibrium separation r . Show that it is given by the mass 
M, the constant n, the equilibrium separation, and the dissociation 
energy of the molecule, as follows: 

„ \2nD 

10-33 The potential energy of an ion in a crystal lattice of alternatcly 
charged ions may be written 

where A, B, and n are constants, e is the elementary charge, and r is 
the distance between closest neighbors in the lattice, called the lattice 
constant. This potential arises from the l/r 2 force of electrostatic 

420 Energy conservation in dynamics 

attraction, together with a short-range repulsive force as two adjacent 
ions are brought close together. 

(a) Make a graph of U(r) versus r. Making sure to identify r 
correctly, what can you say about the stability of the crystal structure? 

(b) Calculate the lattice constant ro in terms of A, B, e, and n, 
from the equilibrium condition 



(This defines the inter-ionic distance for which the energy of the lattice 
as a whole is minimized.) 

(c) Show that the binding energy per mole of molecules is 

u = —NolKro) N o = Avogadro's number 
~6 X 10 23 mole -1 

Using the result of part (b), determine u in terms of r . 

(d) For NaCl crystal, the equilibrium lattice spacing ro is 
2.8 A, and the exponent n is about 10. The constant A is equal to 
1.7 (dimensionless) if r is expressed in centimeters and e is given in 
esu (e = 4.8 X 10 -10 esu). Using these values, calculate a theoretical 
value for u and compare with the experimental value of 183 kcal/mole. 

421 Problems 

A technique succeeds in mathematical physics, not by a 
clever trick, or a happy accident, but because it expresses 
some aspect ofa physical truth. 

o. G. sutton, Mathematics in Action (1954) 


Conservative forces and 
motion in space 


throughout chapter 10 we consistently applied one important 
simplification or restriction, by confining our discussion to 
motion in one dimension only. This clearly prevented us from 
studying some of the most interesting and important problems 
i n dynamics. In the course of the present chapter we shall free 
ourselves of this restriction and in the process show the energy 
method of analysis to still greater advantage. 

To begin the discussion, let us consider a problem in motion 
under gravity near the earth's surface. Suppose we have two 
very smooth tubes connecting two points, A and B, at different 
levels in the same vertical plane (Fig. 11-1). A small particle, 
placed in either of these tubes and released from rest at A, slides 
down and emerges at B. If the tubes are effectively frictionless, 
the forces exerted by them on the particle are always at right 
angles to the particle's motion. Hence these forces do no work 


Fig. 11-1 Alternatice paths between Path 1 

two gtoen points f or motion in a 
vertical plane. 


on the particle ; whatever changes may occur in its kinetic energy 
cannot be ascribed to them. What these forces do achieve is to 
compel the particle to follow a particular path so that it emerges 
at B traveling in a designated direction. If it follows path 1, it 
emerges with a velocity v t as shown; if it follows path 2, it 
emerges with a velocity v 2 . Of course the energy of the particle 
does change as it moves along either tube; the gravitational 
force is doing work on it. But we observe a very interesting fact: 
Although the directions of the velocities Vi and v 2 are quite 
different, their magnitudes are the same. The kinetic energy 
given to the particle by the gravitational force is the same for all 
paths beginning at A and ending at B. 

How does this come about? It is not difhcult to see. As 
the particle travels through some clement of displacement ds the 
work dW done on it is given by 

dW = |F„| \ds\ cos 6 = F„ • ds 

where B is the angle between the directions of F„ and ds. But 
the force F„ is a constant force (i.e., the same at any position) 
with the following components: 

Fx = F„= -mg 

(we take the y axis as positive upward). The element of dis- 
placement has components (dx, dy). Now from the basic defini- 
tion of dW as |F| \ds\ cos 6 we have 

dW = F x dx + F„ dy 

To see this, consider any two vectors A and B in the xy plane, 
making angles a and /3, respectively, with the x axis (Fig. 11-2). 
Then if the angle between them is 6 we have, by a Standard 
trigonometric theorem, that 

cos 6 = cos(/3 — a) = cos /3 cos a + sin/3sina 

The scalar product 5 (= A • B) is thus given by 

S = |A| |B| (cos /3 cos a + sin/3sina) 

Fig. 11-2 Basis for obtainiiiR the scalar product A • B 
in terms of individual components, as may be convenient 
in calculaling the work F • ds in an arbilrary displace- 

424 Conscrvative forces and molion in space 


|A| cosa = A x |A| sina = A„ 
and similarly for the components of B. Thus we have 

A • B = A X B X + A u By (two dimensions only) 
More generally, if the vectors also have nonzero z components, 

A • B = A X B X + A y B u + A,B, 
Thus in general we shall have 

dW = F • ds = F x dx + Fydy + F, dz (11-1) 

In the present two-dimensional problem, with F x = and 
F y = —mg, this gives us 

dW = —mgdy 

Hence for a change of vertical coordinate from y\ to y 2, regard- 
less of the change of x coordinate or of the particular path taken, 
we have a change of kinetic energy given by 

— /. 

K 2 -K l = JdW= -mg(y 2 - yi ) (11-2) 

which exactly reproduces the result that we derived in Chapter 10 
for purely vertical motion and which permits us again to define 
a gravitational potential energy U(y) equal to mgy. 

This result makes for a great extension of our energy methods 
to situations wherc, in addition to gravity, we have so-called 
"forces of constraint," which control the path of an object but, 
because they act always at right angles to its motion, do nothing 
to change its energy. Let us consider some specific examples. 


We shall begin with a problem which, if tacklcd by the dircct 
application of Newton's laws, requires us to write a statement 
of F = wa for each of two objects separately. The problem is to 
find the magnitude of the acceleration of two connected masses, 
mi and m 2 , moving on smooth planes as shown in Fig. 11-3. 
The accelerations of the masses are different vectors, a! and a 2 , 

425 Acceleration of two connected masses 

Fig. 1 1-3 Motion ofiwo coimected 
masses — a simple example of the use 
of energy-conseruation methods. 

even though they have the same magnitude a. Thus a single 
statement of F = ma will not suffice. Using the scalar quantity 
energy, however, we can exploit the fact that the magnitudes 
of the displacements and their time derivatives are common to 
both masses. Thus we have |vi| = [v 2 | = v, so that the total 
kinetic energy of the system is given simply by 

K= J(mi +m 2 )v 2 

and its change in a time dt is given by 

dK = («u + mi)odv 
= {m\ + mi)oadt 

Now u dt is the distance moved by each mass parallel to the 
surface on which it rides, and for m 2 the distance v dt down the 
slope means a change dy in vertical coordinate equal to —v dt sin d 
(y positive upward), The associated change dU in gravitational 
potential energy is thus 

dU = -m2gvdtsin6 

But, given conservation of total mechanical energy, assuming 
friction to be absent, we have 

dK + dU - 


(mi + m£)va dt — m2go dt sin 6 = 

whence the familiar result 

m\ + /712 



Suppose that a particle P of mass m is attached to one end 
of a rod of negligible mass and length /, the other end of which 

426 Conservative forces and motion in space 







Fig. 11-4 Mo t ion ofa simple 

pendulum. ^- ^ ' r "~ a y = O 

is pivoted freely at a fixed center C. Let us take an origin O at 
the normal resting position of the object (Fig. 1 1-4). Then the 
position of the object is conveniently described in terms of the 
single angular coordinate B, or, if we prefer, by the displacement 
5 along the circular arc of its path from O (assuming the rod to 
be of invariable length). ' 

If the angular displacement is B, the y coordinate of the 
object is given by 

y = /(1 - cos 0) 
and hence its potential energy by 

1/(0) = mgl(\ - cos 8) (11-3) 

Using our basic energy-conservation statement we have 

Ki + t/i = K 2 + U 2 

for any two points on the path. Substituting for K in terms of m 
and v and for U by Eq. (11-3), we have 

\mui 2 + mgl(l - cosfli) = \mv 2 2 + mgl(\ - cos 02) 

V2 2 = oi 2 + 2gl(cosB 2 - cos 0,) (11-4) 

Clearly, if 8 2 > 6 U then v 2 < V\, 

If the object were started out at the lowest point with a 
velocity v , we should have 

■In a sense, therefore, the motion is one-dimensional, even though the one 
dimension is not a straight line. But we shall not stress this aspect of such a 
system at this point. 

427 Object moving in a vertical circle 

02* = P0* - 2^/(1 -COS0 2 ) 

With the help of this result we can answer such questions as: 
What initial velocity is needed for the object to reach the top 
of the circle? and: What position does it reach if started out with 
less than this velocity? 

Notice the great advantage that the energy method has 
over the direct use of F = ma in this problem. The velocity of 
the object is changing in both magnitude and direction, it has 
radial and transverse components of acceleration, there is an 
unknown push or puli on the object from the rod — yet none of 
these things need be considered in calculating the speed v at any 
given (or y). Once v has been found by Eq. (1 1^) [or perhaps 
by going back to Eq. (11-2) if that is more convenient], then 
one can proceed to deduce the acceleration components and 
other things. 

There may be subtleties in such problems, however. Sup- 
pose, for example, that instead of a more or less rigid rod we had 
a string to constrain the object. This is now a constraint that 
works only one way; it can puli radially inward but it cannot 
push radially outward. One may have a situation in which the 
velocity is not great enough to take the object to the top of the 

Fig. Jl-5 (a) Path o f the bob of a simple pendulum 
launched with insufficient velocity to maintain a tension 
in the string Up to = w. (b) Stroboscopie photograph of 
a bati falling away from a circular channel at the point 
where the contact force becomes zero. (Photograph 
by Jon Rosenfeld, Edueation Research Cenler, M.l.T.) 



428 Conservalive l'orccs and molion in spacc 

circle (although it might be possible with a rigid rod); the object 
will fail away in a parabolic path [Fig. 1 l-5(a)]. The breakaway 
point is reached when the tension in the string just falls to zero 
and the component of F„ along the radius of the circle is just 
equal to the mass m times the requisite centripetal acceleration 
v 2 /L An exactly similar situation can arise if an object moves 
along a circular track made of grooved metal, and Fig. ll-5(b) 
shows a stroboscopic photograph of an object falling away from 
such a track at the point where the normal reaction supplied 
by the track has fallen to zero. The angular position, m , at 
which this occurs [cf . Fig. 1 l-5(a)] is defined by a statement of 
Newton's law : 

< r 

mg cos(tt 

- <L) = ' 








u* = vo 2 

- 2*/(l - 

■ cos 


This leads to the result 

COS0 m = 

2 oo 2 

3 3gl 

We can thus deduce that a particle that starts out from O with 
o less than VJgl will fail to reach the top of the circle, whereas 
with a rigid rod to support it an initial speed of 2\/gl would 
suffice. Notice, therefore, that the energy-conservation principle 
should not be used blindly; one must always be on the alert as 
to whether Newton's law can be satisfied at every stage with the 
particular constraining forces available. 


It was Galileo, in his Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences 
(1638), who first clearly stated the result that the speed attained 
by an object descending under gravity depends only on the 
vertical distance traveled. He applied this result to the uniformly 
accelerated motion of an object down smooth plancs of different 
slopes, as indicated in Fig. 1 l-6(a), which is based on a diagram 
from Galileo's own book. He could not, however, directly 
demonstrate the corrcctness of this proposition using inclined 
planes as such; instead, he performed a very clever experiment 

429 An experiment by Galileo 

Fig. 11-6 (a) Speed atlained by a block sliding down a 
frictionless plane depends only on the verlica! disiance 
traveled, not on the slope. (b) Galileo's pendulum ex- 
periment to demonstrate the properties ofmotion on 
idealized inclined planes. 

with a mass swinging in a circular arc, and applied his remarkable 
scientific insight to what he observed in this situation. Here is 
an account of the experiment, taken with only minor changes 
of notation from Galileo's own description; the clarity and 
modernity of his presentation is quite striking: 

Imagine this page to represent a vertical wali, with a nail driven 
into it; and from the nail let there be suspended a lead bullet 
of one or two ounces by means of a fine vertical thread, OB, say 
from four to six feet long [see Fig. ll-6(b), based on Galileo's 
own sketch]. On this wali draw a horizontal line AA', at right- 
angles to the vertical thread OB (which hangs about two finger- 
breadths in front of the wali). Now bring the thread OB with 
the attached ball into position OA and set it free; first it will be 
observed to descend along the arc ABA' . . . till it almost reaches 
the horizontal AA', a slight shortage being caused by the re- 
sistance of the air and the string. From this we may rightly 
infer that the ball in its dcscent through the arc AB acquired a 
momentum on reaching B which was just sufficient to carry it 
through a similar arc BA' to the same height. 

Having repeated this cxperiment many times, let us now 
drive a nail into the wali close to the perpendicular OB, say at 
N, so that it projects out some five or six finger-breadths in 
order that the thread, again carrying the bullet through the arc 
AB, may strike upon the nail N when the bullet reaches B, and 
thus compel it to traverse the arc BC, described about N as 

430 Conservative forccs and motion in space 

center . . . Now, gentlemen, you will observe with pleasure that 
thc ball swings to the point C in the horizontal line AA', and 
you would see the same thing happen if the obstacle were placed 
at some lower point. . . . ' 

In this way Galileo convinced himself that the speed ac- 
quired by an object in descending any vertical distance is suf- 
ficient to carry it up through an equal vertical distance by a 
different path. He then added to this the reversibility of the 
motion along any given arc and could reach his main conclusion 
that the speed attained by his suspended object must be the same 
whether it descends along the arc A B or the arc C B, or any other 
arc beginning on the level A A' and with its lowest point at B. 
Finally, he could visualize such motion as taking place on a 
continuous succession of inclined planes of different slopes, and 
so formulate his proposition about uniformly accelerated motion 
along different inclines. This was an enormously important 
result, because he was then able to make inferences about free 
fail under gravity by observing the motion of an object rolling 
down an inclined plane with a very gentle slope. This per- 
mitted him to stretch thc time scale of the whole phenomenon 
(a = gsin 6!) and make quantitative measurements of distance 
against time, using as his clock a watcr-filled container with a 
hole in it that he could open and close with his finger— a bril- 
liantly simple device. 


Suppose we bend a piece of very smooth metal track so that it 
has the shape of a parabola curving symmetrically upward with 
its vertex at point O (Fig. 1 1-7). Let the equation of the parabola 

y = JCx 2 (11-5) 

where C is a constant. 

Imagine an object of mass m, free to slide along the track 
with negligible friction. Its gravitational potential energy, re- 
ferred to an arbitrary zero at O, is given by 

U(y) = mgy 

■Quoted from the English translation of Dialogues Concerning Two New 
Sciences (H. Crcw and A. de Salvio, translators), Dover l'ublications, New 

431 Mass on a parabolic track 

Fig. 11-7 Motion of a 
particle on a parabolic 
track in a vertical plane. 

which, by Eq. (1 1-5), we can alternatively write as a function of x: 

U(x) = \mgCx 2 = \kx 2 (11-6) 

where k is a constant of the same dimensions (newtons per meter) 
as a spring constant. At any point {x, y) the mass has a speed v, 
necessarily along the track, and by conservation of energy we 

\mv 2 + U = E (= const.) 

Denoting the x and y components of v by v x and u„, and using 
Eq. (11-6), we have 

%mv x 2 + Imv,* + ikx 2 = E 


This has a marked resemblance to the energy-conservation 
equation of the linear harmonic oscillator. Only the presence 
of the term \mo y 2 spoils things. This suggests to us that if we 
had a situation in which v y were very small compared to v x , the 
motion of the mass on this track would closely approximate 
that of a harmonic oscillator. What do we need to achieve this? 
Common sense tells us more or less immediately that if the track 
is only very slightly curved, so that y « x at each point, the 
vertical motion is very small compared to the horizontal and 
approximately harmonic motion will occur. 

Such motion can be achieved and beautifully demonstrated 
with a "linear air track" 1 in which a metal glider rides on a 
cushion of air blown up through holes in the track. Because of 
the low friction, the oscillation can take place even if the curvature 
is extremely small. To take an example, here is a specification 
of the shape of the track in an actual demonstration (the setting 
was by machine screws at 1-ft spacings; hence the lapse from 

'R. B. Runk, J. L. Slull, and O. L. Anderson, Am. J. Phys., 31, 915 (1963). 

432 Conservativc forces and motion in space 

X, ft 

















Taking any pair of these values, one establishes the value of the 
constant C in Eq. (11-5), e.g., 

x = 4ft = 1.22 m 

y - i in. = 6.35 X 10"» m 


C = 2y/x 2 = 8.55 X K)- 3 m" 1 

What would be the cxpected period of the motion? For 
mass m and "spring" constant k, we have T = 2r(m/ky 12 , and, 
from Eq. (11-6), k = mgC. Therefore, 

m/ k = (gC)"' « 11.9sec 2 
7"- 2»vTT9« 21.6 sec 

The measured period was within a few tenths of a second of 
this and independent of amplitude to the accuracy of the mea- 

In this example (and the others of motion under gravity) 
the moving object, i n its two-dimcnsional motion, really does 
ride a contour that corresponds in form to the graph of U(x) 
against x. These are truc two-dimensional motions; they arc 
physically distinct from the onc-dimensional situations discussed 
in Chapter 10. To appreciate the difference between them, 
consider two quite realizable physical systems. The first one 
[Fig. ll-8(a)] is a mass m attached to a horizontal spring and 
resting on a smooth table. The second [Fig. ll-8(b)] is an equal 

Fig. 11-8 (o) Mass 
attached to a horizon- 
tal spring. (b) Same 
mass on a smooth 
parabolic track. 
(c) Arrangements (a) 
and (b) can be made 
to have identical varia- 
tions ofpotential 
energy with x, bui the 
motions are different. 

433 Mass on a parabolic track 

mass m free to slide on a parabolic track. The strength of the 
spring and the curvature of the track are adjusted so that the 
systems have the same parabolic potential energy curve of U(x) 
against x, as shown in Fig. ll-8(c). If projccted horizontally 
from the origin with the same speed v , both masses will have 
the same magnitude of velocity at any other value of x. If set 
into oscillation, both systems will be periodic. But their periods 
will be different. The mass on the spring will have the same 
period at all amplitudes ; the other system will show a progressive 
change of period with amplitude (which way do you think it 
will be?). It is only in special situations, such as that with the 
very slightly curved track, that the two motions become essentially 
the same. 


In diseussing the simple pendulum, we are returning to the 
problem of an object moving in a vertical circle. This time, 
howevcr, we shall go into it more carefully. It is an important 
type of physical system, over and above its use in eloeks, and it 
is not quite so simple as its traditional name implies. The sim- 
plicity is primarily in its structure — idealized as a point mass on 
a massless, rigid rod. 

As we saw earlier [Eq. (11-3)], the potential energy, U(6), 
expressed in terms of the angle that the supporting rod makes 
with the vertical, can be written in the form 

U = mgl(l - cos 0) = 2mg/sin 2 I "- 


Ifwe plot this expression for U as a funetion of d, we get Fig. 11-9. 

Fig. 11-9 Energy 
diagram for a rigid 
pendulum, using the 
angle 6 as the coor- 
dinate. The pendulum 
is trapped in oseil/a- 
tory motion about 
6 = Oi/Eis/ess 
than 2mgl. 

434 Conservative forees and motion i n space 

In Fig. 1 1-9, 6 can take all values from — oo to + cc . How- 
ever, all positions of the pendulum in space are described by 
values of 6 between —t and -\-k. Any value of d outside this 
range corresponds to one and only one angle 6 inside the range. 
The latter is obtained by adding to or subtracting from the 
former a whole-number multiple of 2r. 

Two kinds of motion are possible, depending on whether E 
is less than or greater than 2mgl (referred to a zero of energy 
defined by an object at rest at the lowest position of the pen- 
dulum bob). 

If the total energy is sufficiently great (e.g., as for E 2 in the 
figure), there are no turning points in the motion; 8 increases 
(or decreases) without limit, corresponding to continucd rotation 
of the pendulum rather than oscillation. The speed of the pen- 
dulum bob is maximum at = (or ±2ir, ±4ir, etc.) and 
minimum at 6 = ±tt (or ±3tt, ±5ir, etc.). It is clear from Fig. 
11-9 that to produce such rotational motion the pendulum must 
have a kinetic energy at least equal to 2mgl at the lowest point 
of the swing. 

If E < 2mgl, say E y, the motion is oscillatory and the 
angle B changes from +6q to — 6q and back again (Fig. 11-9). 
However, the motion is not harmonic except for sufficiently small 
amplitudes. In the neighborhood of O, one can very nearly 
match the potential-encrgy curve of Fig. 11-9 by a parabola 
(Fig. 11-10), so that for these small amplitudes the oscillations 
are just those of the linear oscillator. One way of justifying this 
statement is to recall the general argument, made in Chapter 10, 
that almost any symmetrical potential-energy curve can be 
approximated by a parabola over some limited range of small 
displacements. Another way is to note that in Eq. (1 1-8), if d 

Fig. 11-10 Potential- 
energy diagram of a 
simple pendulum. 

435 The simple pendulum 

is small, one can set sin(0/2) approximately equal to 0/2, so that 
we have 

U(8) « Imgie 1 


A third way depends upon using the same approximation that 
Newton used when he described the moon as a falling object. 
Applying it to the present problem, and taking the origin at O, 
the circular path is given by the equation 

x 2 + (l - y) 2 = / a 

(seeFig. 11-11). Therefore, 

y 2 - 2ly + x 2 = 
y = /-(/ 2 -* 2 )" 2 

= / 



If x 2 <5C l 2 , we can use the binomial expansion to yield the 
approximate result 

1 £ 

2 l 


[Compare this with Eq. (11-5); you will then realize what the 
constant C in that equation represents. In the actual experiment 
described, the motion was like that of a simple pendulum nearly 

Equation (11-10) suggests a somewhat different approxima- 
tion for small oscillations of the pendulum, describing its motion 
in terms of its horizontal displacement instead of its angular one. 
But whatever analysis we adopt, it is clear that the period must 
depend on the amplitude. We can also argue qualitatively which 
way it varies. Looking at Fig. 11-10, we can say that the curve 

Fig. 11-11 Geomelry ofilisplace- 
ments of a simple pendulum. 


436 Conservalive forccs and motion in spacc 

of U(6) for the pendulum describes a kind of spring that gets 
"softer" at large extensions. Compared to the parabolic behavior 
that would hold for an ideal spring, the restoring force is rela- 
tively less at larger displacements. Thus one might guess that 
the motion becomes more sluggish and hence that the period 
increases. Certainly there is one extreme case that leaves" no 
room for doubt. If the energy is such that the pendulum just 
exactly arrives at n = jr, there is no restoring force at all; the 
pendulum would sit upside down indefinitely — although in 
practice this is of course an unstable equilibrium. Even at 
amplitudes short of this the increase of period is drastic. If you 
are interested, the section after next describes the analysis of 
larger-amplitude motion. But first we shall make a detailed 
study of the small-angle approximation. 


The speed of the pendulum bob at any point is equal to / dd/dt, 
so that the cncrgy-conservation cquation is 


5^/ 2 (^) + U{6) = E (exact) 

Using the approximate expression for U(6) from Eq. (11-9), we 

iml 2 {^) + $mgl0 2 = E (approx.) 



Tt) + ]° 2 ° const - (n-u) 

By now we have met this form of equation scveral times and 
can identify (g/l) 1 ' 2 as being the quantity w that defines the 
period of the oscillation: 




[Caution: It is the angular displacement itself that undergoes 
a simple harmonic variation, described by the equation 

0(0 = O sin(oo/ 4- v,,) (11-13) 

437 The pendulurrms a harmonic oseiliator 

This can be confusing; the actual angular displaccment of the 
pendulum is deseribed in terms of the sine of the purely mathe- 
matical phase angle (w/ + <p ), The actual angular velocity of 
the pendulum is dB/dt— not the w in (ut + <p ), which serves 
merely to define the periodicity.] 

The behavior of the simple pendulum as a elose approxima- 
tion to a harmonic oscillator is so important that we shall com- 
ment on it further. First, let us take a moment to consider the 
derivation of its equation of motion by a direct application of 
Newton's law. We can do this in two different ways, according 
to whether we analyze the problem in terms of linear or angular 

Linear motion 

We consider the horizontal foree aeting on the pendulum bob 
when it is a horizontal distance x from its equilibrium position 
[Fig. 1 1— 12(a)]. If the tension in the suspending string is F T , 
we have 


m— = -F r sin0 = -F T -. 
at* I 

If the vertical component of acceleration of the bob is negligibly 
small, we can, however, put 

Ft cos 6 « F a = mg 

For small angles 6, cos 8 ~ 1 - d 2 /2 w I, SO that F T « mg 
and the equation of horizontal motion becomes 

Fig. 11-12 Basis for 
analyzing the motion 
of a simple pendulum 
(a) in terms of hori- 
zontal displacements, 
and (b) in terms of 
angular displacements. 

438 Conservalive forees and motion in space 

J 2 

d x mg 

m W~~T x 

leading once again to Eq. (11-12) for the period T. 

Angular motion 

In this case we consider the transverse acceleration a e 
(= l d 2 8/dt 2 ), which is produced by the component of F„ in the 
direction of the tangent to the circular arc along which the pen- 
dulum bob moves (see Fig. ll-12b). The magnitude of the 
tension force F^ (which actually varies with time) does not enter 
into this treatment of the problem. We have, simply, 

rf 2 
w/—- = — F„sin0 = — mg s'm 6 

For small 0, sin « 9, and so we have 

which leads to Eq. (1 1-13) for as a function of time. It can be 
seen that the analysis in terms of the angular variables is a 
"cleaner" treatment than the other, involving only the one ap- 
proximation sin 9 « 9. 

The isochronous behavior of the simple pendulum — the fact 
that its period is almost completely independent of amplitude 
over a wide range — provides a striking example of this remark- 
able and unique property of systems governed by restoring 
forces proportional to the displacement from equilibrium. Sup- 
pose we had two identical pendulums, each with a string of 
length 30 ft, suspended from a high support. Each would have 
a period of about 6 sec. And if we set one swinging with an 
amplitude of only an inch or two, so that its motion was almost 
imperceptible, and set the other swinging with an amplitude of 
5 ft, so that it swept through the central position at a speed of 
about 5 ft/sec, the difference in their periods would be too small 
to put them significantly out of step in less than a hundred swings 
or so. 

This same isochronous property of the pendulum was of 
great and perhaps crucial help to Newton, Huygens, et al. when 
they made their fundamental experiments on collision phenomena 
(cf. Chapter 9). AH these experiments were done with masses 
suspended from equal strings. As long as the small-amplitude 

439 The pendulum as a liarmonic oscillatoi 


Fig. 11-13 (a) Two pendulums ofeqnal Icngth are re- 
leasedfrom arbitrary posltions al ihe same instan/, 
(b) The isochronous properly of ihe pendulum ensures 
that ihe collision occurs w/ien bolh masses are al Ihe 
boltom politis of iheir swing. 

approximation is valid, two masses released at the same instant 
from arbitrary positions [Fig. ll-13(a)] will rcach thcir lowcst 
points at thc same instant [Fig. ll-13(b)], so that the collision 
occurs when each mass is traveling horizontally with its maximum 
vclocity— thc magnitude of which is given by the equations of 
simplc harmonic motion. ' Even for angular amplitudes that are 
large enough to require the use of the exact equation for p m „ , 

t'Lx = 2gl{\ - cos O ) 

the colliding masses will reach their lowest points at almost the 
same instant as long as O is less than 90°, which it would have 
to be for an object attached to a string rather than to a rigid rod. 
The next section briefly discusses the detailed dependence of 
period on amplitude for a simple pendulum. 


To find how the period of a simple pendulum departs from 
its ideal small-amplitude value, we write the equation for con- 
servation of energy in the exact form 


+ 2<oo 2 (l - cos 0) = 2coo 2 (l - cos 8 ) 


where w,, 2 = g/l and #o > s tne maximum angle of dcflcction from 
the vertical. 

The period of oscillation is thcn given by 

7X0,,) = 



fs/2 J-t (co$8 - cos<?o) 



'You can easily vcrify that the magnitude of this velocity is proportional, in 
thc small-amplitude approximation, to the horizontal distance through which 
a mass is initially drawn aside before bcing released. This makes analysis of 
thc cxperiments very simple. 
2 This section may be omitted without loss of continuity. 

440 Conservative forces and motion in space 

Fig. 11-14 Precise 
measuremenls on the 
period of a simple 
pendulum, showing the 
quadratic increase of 
period wilh amplitude, 
and the close approach 
to isochronism ob- 
tained by damping 
the top endofthe 
supporting wire be- 
tween cycloidal jaws, 
so that the free length 
shortens as the ampli- 
tude increases. 

For small amplitudes, we of course have a period T equal to 
2w/(j)o, as discussed iri the previous section. The integral of 
Eq. (11-15) cannot be carried out exactly; one has to resort to 
numerical methods or to a series expansion of the integrand 
which gives, as a next approximation to the period, the following 

7tyo)« To 1 +£sin 



If O is not too large, another acceptable form of this result, in 
terms of the horizontal amplitude A (= /sin 6 ) is the formula 

T(A) « To 



Figure 11-14 shows the results of some precision measurements 
that verify Eq. (11-17). 1 The pendulum had a length of about 
3 m, and the greatest amplitude used was about 0.5 m, so that 
values of 6 up to about 10° (« 0.17 rad) are represented. It is 
worth noting that the over-all change of T from the least to the 
greatest values of d studied is less than 2 parts in 1000; the in- 
dividual points are accurate to about 1 part in 10 5 , and the 
validity of Eq. (11-17) is very nicely demonstrated over this 
range of O - The graph also shows the results of using a special 

'M. K. Smith, Am. J. Pftys., 32, 632 (1964). 

441 The pendulum with larger amplitude 

pendulum support that shortens the pendulum as 6 increases, in 
such a way that the tendency for T to increase with O >s almost 
completely compensated. Ideally, the support should be shaped 
so that the path of the pendulum is a portion of a cycloid curve. 
(Incidentally, the method of making an exactly isochronous 
pendulum, through the use of a cycloidal suspension, was first 
discovered by Huygens. In 1673 he published a great book, the 
HoroJogium Oscillatoriwn, in which many important dynamical 
results were first presented within the framework of the very 
practical problems of clock design.) 


The problems of energy conservation that we have discussed so 
far have involved only the familiar force of gravity near the 
earth's surface— a force which, as experienced by any given 
object, has effectively the same magnitude and the same direction 
in a given locality, regardless of horizontal or vertical displace- 
ments (within wide limits). 1 But, as we know, the basic gravita- 
tional interaction is a force varying as the inverse square of the 
distance between two particles and exerted along the line joining 
their centers. It is an example of the vcry important class of 
forces— central forces— which are purcly radial with respect to a 
given point, the "center of force". It has the further property 
of being sphcrically symmetric; that is, the magnitude of the 
force depends only on the radial distance from the center of force, 
and not on the direction. We shall show that all such spherically 
symmetric central forces are conservative, and shall then con- 
sider the special features of the l/r 2 force that holds for gravita- 
tion and electrostaties. 

If a partiele is exposed to a central force, the force veetor F 
aeting on it has only one component, F T . If the force is also 
spherically symmetric, then F r can be written as a funetion of r 

F r =/(r) (11-18) 

We shall prove that any such sphcrically symmetric central force 
is conservative by showing that the work done by the force on a 

•Recall, howcvcr, that small local variations are in Tacl detectable by sensitive 
gravity survey instruments, as deseribed in Chapter 8. 

442 Conservative forces and motion in space 

__M— _______ 



7%. 77-75 (a) Diagram for eonsideration ofpotential- 
energy changes in a Central force field. (b) Analysis 
of an arbitrary pai h into radial elements along which 
work is done, and transverse elements along which no 
work is done. (c) Closed path in a conservative central 
force field. 

test particle, as the latter changes its position from a point A to 
another point B [Fig. II-I5(a)], does not depend on the par- 
ticular path connecting A and 73, but only on these end points. 
If this result holds, then it will be true that the particle, if it went 
from A to B by this path, and returned from B to A by any other 
path, would have no net work done on it by the central force 
and would (if no work were done on it by other forces) return 
to A with the same kinetic energy that it had to start with. This 
then corresponds exactly to the conservative property as defined 
for one-dimensional motions. 

Let the center of force be at O [Fig. ll-15(a)], and consider 
the work done by the central force F on the test particle as it 
undergoes a displacement ds along the path as shown. This 
work is given by 

dW = F • ds = F ds cos a 


where a is the angle between the direction of F, i.e., the direction 
of r, and the direction of ds. From the figure, however, we see 

ds cos a = dr 

where dr is the change of distance from O, resulting from the 
displacement ds. Inserting this value of ds cos a into Eq. (1 1-19), 
we have 

dW = Fdr 

443 Universal gravitation: a conservative central force 

where the magnitude of the force [F = /(/■)] depends only on r 
as indicated in Eq. (1 1-18). We then have for the work done by 
F on the test object as it moves from A to B, 

r 'b 
W= / f(r)dr (11-20) 

•> 'A 

Because this integral has a value that depends only on its limits 
and not on the path, we can conclude that the spherically sym- 
metric central force is conservative. This result can be arrived 
at in slightly different terms by picturing the actual path as being 
built up from a succession of small steps, as shown in Fig. 
ll-15(b). One component of each step is motion along an arc 
at constant r, so that the force is perpendicular to the displace- 
ment and the contribution to W is zero, and the other component 
is a purely radial displacement so that the force and the dis- 
placement are in the same direction, resulting in the amount of 
work F dr by the central force. 

[A converse to the result we have just derived is the following 
important proposition : 

A central force fleld that is also conservative must be spherically 

To show this, suppose that a center of force exists at the point O 
in Fig. ll-15(c). Imagine a closed path ABCD, formed by very 
short portions of two radial lines drawn from O, and by the two 
circular arcs BC and DA. Since, by definition, the force is purely 
central, it has no component perpendicular to the radial direction 
from O at any point. Thus, if we imagine a particle carried 
around ABCD, it cxperiences no force along BC and D A. The 
condition that the force be conservative thus requires equal and 
opposite amounts of work along AB and CD. Since these lines 
are of equal length, the mean magnitude of the force must be 
the same on each. If we imagine the lengths of these elements 
of path to become arbitrarily small, we conclude that the value 
of the force at a particular scalar value of r is independent of the 
direction in which the vector r is drawn. The most important 
sources of such spherically symmetric force fields are spherically 
symmetric distributions of mass or electric charge.] 

It is important to realize that a force may be conservative 
without being central or spherically symmetric. For example, 
the combined gravitational effcct of a pair of concentrated un- 
equal masses, separated by some distance, has a complicated 

444 Conservative forces and motion in space 

dependence on position and direction, but we know that it is 
conservative because it is the superposition of two individually 
conservative force fields of thc separate masses. 

Given the rcsult expressed by Eq. (11-20), we can proceed 
to define a potential energy U(r) for any object exposed to a 
spherically symmetric central force: 

r 'd 
= - / f (r) 

J 'A 

V B - U a = - / f(r)dr (11-21) 

If the kinetic energy of the object at points A and B has the values 
K A and K B , respectivcly, then (if no work is done by other 
forces) we have 

Kg - Ka = W 


Ka + U A - K B + Ub - B (11-22) 

Thus we have established an energy-conservation statement for 
an object moving under the action of any central force. 
For an inverse-square force, we have 

F(r) = ^ 2 dl-23) 

In such a case, therefore, Eq. (11-21) gives us 

r 'n 
U B - U a C r" 2 dr 

J 'A 

from which we get . 

Vb r a) 

Ub- Ua- Cl — -— J (11-24) 

Vb r a) 

There remains only the choice of the zero of potential energy. 
It is convenient to set U = for r = ao, i.e., at points infinitely 
far from the source at O, since thc force vanishes at these points, 
and in colloquial terms one can say that the existencc of either 
particle is of no consequence to the other one under these con- 
ditions. We now apply Eq. (11-24) to the case where r A = y-, 
U A = 0, and the potential energy of thc test particle becomcs 
Ub = C/rji — or, if we drop the now redundant subscript B, 
there follows 

445 Universal gravitation; a conservative central force 

V(r) = - f (11-25) 

for the potential energy of a test particle as a function of its 

Equation (11-25) is valid for either an attractive or a re- 
pulsive force, the constant C being negative for attractive forces 
and positive for repulsive forces. In particular, for a particle of 
mass m under the gravitational attraction of a point mass M 
(which we shall suppose to be fixed at the origin O) we have 

F(r)=-^ (.1-26) 

DW--2? 01-27) 

Note that these last two equations refer only to the inter- 
action between two objects that can be regarded as though they 
were points — i.e., their linear dimensions are small compared to 
their separation. As we saw in Chapter 8, however, some of the 
most interesting and important gravitational problems concern 
the gravitational forces exerted by large spherical objects such 
as the earth or the sun. In our earlier discussion of such prob- 
lems, we saw that the basic problem is the interaction between 
a point particle and a thin spherical shell of material. In Chapter 
8 we presented a frontal attack on this problem, going directly 
to an evaluation of an integral over all contributions to*the net 
force. Now we shall approach the problem by way of a con- 
sideration of potential energies, and in the process we shall see 
the great value of the potential energy concept in such cal- 


Suppose, as in our earlier treatment of the problem, that we have 
a thin, uniform shell of matter, of radius R and mass M (Fig. 
11-16). Let a particle of mass m be placed at some point P a 
distance r from the center of the shell. If we deal directly in 
terms of forces, then, as we saw, the force from material in the 
vicinity of a point such as A must be resolved along the line OP. 
In other words, a vector sum of all the force contributions is 
necessary. If we deal in terms of potential energy, however, we 
can cxploit its most important propcrty: Potential energy is a 

446 Conservative forces and motion in space 

Fig. 11-16 Diagram 
for considering the 
gravitational potential 
energy due to a cir- 
cular zone ofa thin 
spherical shell of 

scalar guantity. We can just add up the contributions to U from 
all parts of the shell. The force on m is then obtained simply 
from the relation 

F --™ 
tr dr 


As in our direct calculation of the force, we take advantage 
of the symmetry of the system by considering the zone of material 
marked off on the sphere between the angles B and B + dB 
(Fig. 11-16). For this zone we have 

area = 2ir R sin B dd 
2wR 2 sm9d6 





dM = iMsinddd 

All of this material in dM is at the same distance, s, from P. 
Thus the contribution that dM makes to U is given, according 
toEq. (11-27), by 

dU = - 


GMm sin 6 dB 

s 2 s 

The total potential energy of m is thus 

... . GMm f sin 6 dB 

U(r) = - 


2 J s 
This integral is to be evaluated, keeping R and r constant, by 

447 A «ravilating spherical shell 

allowing to sweep from zero to ir (s changing accordingly) so 
as to include the contributions of all parts of the shell. The 
calculation is made simple by the fact that, in the triangle AOP, 
we have 

s 2 = R 2 + r 2 - 2Rrcos0 

Differentiating both sides with respect to 0, remembering that R 
and r are constants for the purpose of the integration in Eq. 
(11-29), wehave 

2*^- = 2Rrsin6 

sin 6 dd 


But the left-hand side of this is just the integrand of Eq. (1 1-29), 
which thus becomes 

U(r) = - 

2Rr 7»-o 



Equalion (11-30) is the key result in cakulating gravitational 
potenlial energies andforces due lo spherkal objecls. In evaluating 

Fig. 11-17 (o) Gravi- 
tational potential 
energy of a point 
parlicle as a function 
of its distancc from 
the center of a thin 
splierical shell of 
radius R. (b) Varia- 
tion of F with r, de- 
riaed from (a). 

448 Conscrvative forces and motion in space 

the integral of ds, however, we must distinguish two cases: 

Case 1. Point P outside the shell (i.e., r > R, as in Fig. 
11-16). The limits on s are defined as follows: 

= giving s,„i n = r — R 
= 7r giving s mnx = r + R 


Smnx Anln = 2*1 

U(j.)--2MH (point o«to<fe shell) (11-31) 2. Point P inside the shell (i.e., r < R). The limits 
now become 

8 = giving s mi „ = /? - r 

9 = x giving s msx = /? + r 


U(r) = - ^^ (point inside shell) (11-32) 

These two results are disarmingly alike. The forces derived 
from them are, however, quite different. If we proceed now to 
calculate the forces from Eq. (11-28), we must remember that R 
(the radius of the shell) is a constant. It is only r, the distance 
of the mass m from O, that can vary. Hence we have 

Case 1. 

F r = j— (point outside shell) (11-33) 

Case 2. 

F r = (point inside shell) (11-34) 

In Fig. 11-17 we show the graphs of potential energy and 
forcc as functions of the radial distance r of the test mass m from 
the center of the shell. The discontinuities at r = R are easily 

Once we have obtained these results, it is a simple matter 
to consider a solid sphere of material. 

449 A gravitaling spherical shell 


Our primary assumption is that the sphere can be regarded as 
made up of a whole succession of uniform spherical shells, even 
though the density may vary with radial distance from the center. 
Granted this assumption of symmetry, we can at once draw 
some conclusions about the gravitational force cxerted by such 
a sphere, of total mass M and radius R. 

Case 1. Observation point oulside the sphere (r > R). Since 
each component spherical shell acts as though its whole mass 
were at the center, the same can be said for the sphere as a 
whole. Regardless of the way in which the density of the ma- 
terial varies with radius, we have 

F(r) = — (point oulside sphere) (11-35) 

This is the result that we have already used in Chapter 8 in 
discussing Newton's famous comparison of the gravitational 
accelerations of the moon and the apple. 

Case 2. Observation point inside sphere (r < R). Here we 
must be more careful, but we can at once make two clear state- 

a. For all the spherical shells lying oulside the observation 
point, the contribution to the force is zero, by Eq. (1 1-34). 

b. For all shells lying inside the radius defined by the ob- 
servation point, the mass is effectively concentrated at the center, 
byEq. (11-33). 

To specify the force in this case, therefore, we must know 
how much mass is enclosed within the sphere of radius r drawn 
through the observation point. 

Case l', (special) The same as case 2, but with the extra 
proviso that the density of the sphere is the same for all r — the 
sphere is homogeneous. In this case, we know that the fraction 
of the mass contained within radius r is equal to r 3 /R 3 , because 
this is the ratio of the partial volume to the whole volume. Hence 
the amount of mass to be considered is equal to Mr 3 /R 3 , effec- 
tively at the center, i.e., a distance r from the position of the test 
mass. This then gives us 

F ^ = W r (P°' nt inside homogeneous sphere) 


450 Conservative forces and mol ion in space 

Fig. 11-18 (a) Force 
on a poinl particle as 
a function of ils dis- 
lancefrom the center 
ofa uniform solid 
sphere of radius R. 
{b) Variation of 
mutual polential 
energy with r, obtained 
front {a) by integra- 
tion. The approxi- 
mately linear increase 
ofU with r jusi ouiside 
r = R corresponds to 
gravily as observed 
near the earih's sur- 

The combined results of Eqs. (11-35) and (11-36) for a homo- 
geneous sphere are shown in Fig. ll-18(a). One can also con- 
struct the graph of potential energy versus r for all values of the 
distance of a particle of mass m from the center of the sphere. 
This is shown in Fig. ll-18(b). For interior points (r < R) we 



(R2 - r2) 

But we already know, by putting r = R in Eq. (11-31), that 

U(R) = - 

Thus we get 


(r<R) </(,)= -^(3K2-,2) 

In particular, at r = 0, we have 


451 A gravitating sphere 

1/(0) = - 


If one imagines starting out from r = 0, then, as Fig. ll-18(b) 
shows, the potential energy increases parabolically with distance 
up to r = R and then goes over smoothly into the continued 
increase of U with r that is described by Eq. (11-31). 

The variations of F(f) and U(r) for r > R in Fig. 1 1-18 hold 
good, as wc have seen, for any spherically symmetrical distribu- 
tion of matter; there is no requirement that the sphere should 
be homogeneous. On the other hand, one must be careful to 
remember that Eqs. (11-36) and (11-37), for r < R, refer only 
to the special case of a sphere of the same density throughout. 
Thus it does not correctly describe the variation of gravitational 
force with radial distance inside such objects as the earth and 
the sun, which have drastic variations of density with r (see 
Fig. 11-19). This invalidates a favorite textbook cxercise: "Show 
that a particle would execute simple harmonic motion in a tunnel 
bored along a diameter of the earth." The practical impossibility 
of making such a tunnel may, however, be considered as a far 
more powerful objection. 

If one is used to thinking that the potential energy of an 
object of mass m, a distance h above the earth's surface, is given 

Fig. 11-19 (a) Radial variation of density inside the 
earth. (After E. C. Bullard.) (b) Calculated variation 
of density wiih radial distance inside the sun (I. Iben and 
Z. Abraham, M.I.T.). 

452 Conservative forces and motion i n spacc 

by the formula U = mgh, it may seem hard to reconcile this 
result with the result expressed by Eq. (11-31): 

U(r)=-™^ (r>R) 

There is really no difficulty, however, once one recognizes that 
the zero of potential energy is arbitrary and that the simple 
linear formula applies only to objects raised through distances 
that are exceedingly small compared to the earth's radius. We 
have, in fact, from the more general formula [i.e., Eq. (11-31)], 

U(R + h)-U(R)=-^- + ^- 
R + h R 




Since, however, G Mm/ R 2 is the gravitational force mg exerted 
on m, this gives us 

U(R + h) - U(R) « mgh 

By putting U(R) = as an arbitrary reference level of potential 
energy, we see that U = mgh is an acceptable approximation 
that applies to small displacements near the earth's surface. This 
approximatcly linear increase of potential energy with distance 
just outside a sphere is indicated on Fig. ll-18(b). 


Suppose we have an object at the surface of a large gravitating 
sphere, such as a planet, and we want to shoot the object off into 
outer space so that it never returns. What speed must we give it? 
This problem is easily considered in terms of energy conservation. 
At the surface of the planet (r = R) the potential energy is given 

U(R) = _ ^ 

At r = co we have U = 0. The particle, to reach /■=<», must 
survive to this distance with some kinetic energy .K(oo). Thus at 
launch it must have a kinetic energy K(R) defined through the 
conservation equation 

453 Escape velocities 





The critical condition is reached if we take the equality in the 
above statcmcnt; the object would then just reach infinity with 
zero residual speed. The minimum escape speed at radius R is 
thus given by 

, , GMm 


* = ^ (11-38) 

In calculating the escape velocity from the earth's surface, it 
may be convenient to state the result of Eq. (11-38) in another 
form that makes use of our knowledge that the gravitational 
force on a mass m at r = Re can be set equal to the magnitude 
of w times the local acceleration due to gravity, g: 

~R^ =mg 



and so, from Eq. (11-38), we have 

DO = VgR E ) v2 (H-39) 

Putting in the familiar values g ~ 9.8 m/sec 2 , R E ~ 6.4 X 
10 G m, we have 

bo « 11 .2 km/sec 

Notice once again the remarkable implications of energy con- 
servation. For the purpose of calculating complete escape, wc 
need spccify nothing about the direetion in which the eseaping 
object is fired. It could be radially outward, or tangentially, or 
anything in between ; the same value of v u applics to all cases 
[Fig. ll-20(a)]. 

It is interesting that the magnitude of the escape speed v a 
is exactly \/2 times as great as the orbital speed that a partiele 

454 Conservative forees and motion in space 

Fig. 11-20 (a) The 
possibility ofescape 
from a gravitating 
sphere depends on the 
magnitude of the 
velocity, not on its 
direction. (b) The 
escape speedfrom a 
double-star system 
depends on the position 
o f the start ing point P. 

would have if it could skim around the earth's surface in a 
circular orbit of radius Rj,;. 

The preceding calculation assumes that the object from 
which the escape takes place is isolated from all other objects. 
More complicated escape problems would arise if, for example, 
we wanted to calculatc the escape velocity from the surface of 
one member of a double-star system [Fig. 1 l-20(b)]. We should 
then have to consider where the Iaunching point P was in relation 
to the centers O t and 2 of the two stars. But still the scalar 
property of potential energy makes the calculation relatively 
simple. The potential energy of a mass m at P is just the straight- 
forward sum of the potential energies due to the two stars sep- 
arately. And again the direction of launeh for complete escape 
at the critical velocity is immaterial (as long as the trajectory 
misses the other star!) 

A particularly important example of this last type of system 
is, of course, the earth-moon combination. This is shown 
schematically in Fig. 11-21 (a). If we consider a partiele of 
mass m, its potential energy as a funetion of position along a 
straight line joining the centers of earth and moon is as shown 
by the full line in Fig. ll-21(b). Mathematically it is given by 
the formula 

U(r) = - 

GMf.iti GM.\ r m 
r ' D- r 


where D is the distance between the centers of earth and moon 
and r is the distance of the partiele from the center of the earth. 
This potential energy is simply the sum of the separate con- 
tributions from earth and moon. 

455 Escape velocilies 

Effi ■;[.-''■■- 'v BBS 

Fig. 11-21 (a) Sche- 
malic diagram of the 
earth-moon system. 
(b) Form ofvariation 
Ofthe total potential 
energy of a particle 
along Ihe line joining 
the centers of earth 
and moon. 


The maximum value of U(f) occurs at the point r = r„, 
where (dU/dr) rm = 0. This is clearly also the point at which 
the attractive forccs due to earth and moon are equal and op- 
posite, so that we can put 

GMp.m CMsttn 

(.D - r m y 

This gives 

1 + Wm/Mk) 11 * 

Now the value of M M /M E is about S V. so that r m w 0.90D. 
This represents a point about 24,000 milcs from the moon's 
center. The value of U(r) at this value of r is given, according to 
Eq. (11-40), by 

U(r,„) = - 

GM K m GM M m 


G Me>» 

1. 23GM E m 


+ 3 1 ) 

If a spacecraft is to reach the moon from the earth along the 

456 Conservative forccs and motion in spacc 

direct line considered, it would have to surmount this potential 
energy hump. If, further, this were to be done by simply coasting 
after an initial rocket blast at the point of departure from the 
earth's surface, the necessary minimum initial speed at the earth 
would be defined by the following equation: 

, GM E m ... l.23GM B m 

fwoo 2 ^— = U(r m ) = 

Uh D 

This then gives us 

2GMk ( l.23R K \ 

The factor 2GMe/Re «s just the square of the speed needed for 
complete escape from the earth, as given by Eq. (11-39) and 
evaluated numerically as I1.2km/sec. Putting R E /D ~ g\y in 
the above expression for v 2 , one finds u « 11.1 km/sec. At 
this minimum velocity the traveling object would just barely 
surmount the potential "hill" between earth and moon and 
would then fail toward the moon, reaching its surface with a 
speed of about 2.3 km/sec. (You should check thesc results 
for yourself.) 


In our discussions of forces and potential energy, we have 
pointed out that the fundamental criterion for a force to be 
conservative is that the net work done by the force be zero over 
any closed path. As an aside we pointed out that in one-dimen- 
sional problems, but only in one-dimensional problems, this 
condition is automatically met if the force is a unique function 
of position. We shall now give a simple example to illustrate 
how, in two dimensions, this latter condition is not sufficient. 
A force F(x, y) that is a unique function of x and y may never- 
theless be nonconservative. 

Our example is this: Suppose that a particle, at any point 
in the xy plane, finds itself exposed to a force F given by 

F x = -ky 
F„ = +kx 

where k is a constant and x and y are the coordinates of the 
'This section may be omitted without loss of continuity. 

457 More about ihc critcria for conservative forces 

Fig. 11-22 (a) Rectangular path in a plane. (b) Smooth tube shaped to 
force a parlicle tofollow the palit shown in (a), (c) Closed path made 

up oftwo different paths between llte giuen points A and B. If the 
force is conservalive, the net work is zero. 

particle. Such a force evidently dcpends only on the position of 
the particle. Now let us calculate the work done by this force 
on the particle if the latter moves counterclockwise around the 
closed path shown in Fig. ll-22(a). It may well be objected. 
that the particle would never follow this path under the action 
of the force F and nothing else, but (as we did in our first approach 
to potential energy at the beginning of Chapter 10) we can 
imagine that F is exactly balanced by another force, supplied for 
example by a spring, so that the object can be freely moved 
around without any net work being donc. Or, alternatively, we 
can imagine a very smooth pipe, as in Fig. 1 l-22(b), which com- 
pels the particle to travel along the sides of a rectangle and yet 
does no work on the particle because the force exerted by the 
pipeis always at right angles to the particle's motion. We should 
also add the proviso, in this case, that the particle has enough 
kinetic energy to carry it around the path even ifFistaking energy 
away from it. Now for the caleulation. 

Starting at O, let the particle move along the x axis a distance 
a to the point P with coordinates x = a, y = 0. The work done 
by F during this motion is 

W\ = / F x dx = -ky j dx = 

since y = everywhere on this portion of the closed path. Next, 
the particle moves from P to Q{x = a, y = b). The work done 
by F along this path is 

458 Conservative forees and motion in space 

= / F y dy = +ka dy = kab 

Jv-0 Jo 



For the path from Q to R (0, b), the work done is 
W 3 = / F x dx = -kb / dx = +kab 

and finally, the work W 4 done as the particle moves from R 
back to the origin O is zero, since x and hence F v is zero every- 
where on this path : 

W 4 = 

The total work done in the round trip is therefore 

W = W\ + W% + Ws + W a = Ikab * 

and the force F given by Eq. (1 1-41) is not conservative, although 
it depends only on position. If k were positive, the kinetic energy 
of the particle would be increased by 2kab for each complete 
circuit taken in this direction. On the other hand, if the particle 
traveled clockwise, its kinetic energy would be decreased by this 
amount each time. This may seem — and indeed is — a very 
artificial example; nevertheless, forces having precisely this non- 
conservative property [although not the same analytic forms as 
described by Eq. (1 1-40)] play an important role in physics, 
especially in electromagnetism. 

There is another way of looking at the analysis of such a 
situation. The physical criterion for the force to be conservative 
is that it should do no net work, either positive or negative, as 
the particle to which it is applied makes a complete circuit 
around the path of Fig. ll-22(a) in either direction. Let us 
consider a more general situation [Fig. ll-22(c)] in which a 
particle travels from a point A to a point B along one path and 
returns from B to A along a dirferent path (again imagine that 
constraining forces, doing no work, are applied as necessary). 
We shall assume that the force we are studying (i.e., not including 
any constraining forces) is a function of the position of the par- 
ticle only. If this force is conservative, we then have 

W = j F-ds+ F-ds = 

Path l P«th 2 

459 More about the critcria for conservative forces 

It follows from this that 

/ F • ds = - / F ■ cis 

Path 1 Path 2 

But now, if the force is a function only of position, we can inter- 
change the limits of the integral on the right and reverse its sign. 
Hence, if F is conservative, we must have 

•B r B 


Path 1 Path 2 

Path 1 Pi 

If this condition is satisfied we can put 

Wab=I Fds (ll-42a) 

without reference to the particular path. And if W AB is the 
same for all paths from A to B, we can conclude that the force is 
conservative and that the potential-energy function can be defined 
through the equation 

V b -Ua--J a 

F ds (ll-42b) 

In evaluating work integrals such as that in Eq. (ll-42a), 
one may wish to resolve the force F into its components F x and 
F„, and resolve the element of path ds into its components dx 
and dy, thus getting (for a two-dimensional problem) 


\ F,dx+ F„dy 

If one uses this equation, however, one should always remember 
that, basically, the integrals are defined as being taken along an 
actual designated path of the particle. This might seem to be 
obvious, because the force must necessarily be applied wherever 
the particle is. However, there are many situations in which an 
object experiences a force wherever it happens to be (gravitational 
force, for example). One can then set up a purely mat hemat ical 
statement that defines a value of F for any given x and y. In 
general each component of F is a function of both x and y. And 
unless one already knows that the force is conservative, it is 

460 Conservative forees and motion in ^pace 


Fig. 11-23 Consideration of 
work done dong a specified path 
between two points. 

essential to f'ollow the given path, as in Fig. 11-23, and not take 
the simpler but perhaps unjustified course of (for example) 
finding the integral of F x from jci to x 2 along the line AC 
(y — y\ = const.), followed by the integral of F y from y>\ to y 2 
along the line CB (x = x 2 = const.). 

It is perhaps worth ending this discussion with the remark 
that, in many situations, one may usc the concept of potential 
energy even when additional nonconscrvative forces act on the 
particle. For example, a satellite moving in the gravitational 
field of the earth may be subject to the frictional drag of the 
earth's upper atmosphere. This drag is a dissipative force, non- 
conservative, and the total mechanical energy of the motion 
will not be constant but will decrease as the motion proceeds. 
Nevertheless, one may still properly talk of the gravitational 
potential energy that the satellite possesses at any given point. 

The forces that we have labeled gravitational, electric, and 
magnetic are "action-at-a-distance" forces. No apparent physical 
contact between interacting objects comes into play. For this 
kind of interaction, the idea of a field of force is most useful. 
To introduce this concept, consider the gravitational attraction 
of the earth for a particle outside it. The puli of the earth depends 
both on the mass of the attracted particle and on its location 
relative to the centcr of the earth. This attractive force divided 
by the mass of the particle being pulled depends only on the 
earth and the location of the attracted object. We can therefore 
assign to each point of space a vector, of magnitude equal to 

■This section may bc omitted without loss of continuity. 

461 Fielcis 

the earth's puli on a particle divided by its mass, and of direction 
identical with that of the attractive force. Thus we imagine a 
collection of vectors throughout space, in general different in 
magnitude and direction at each point of space, which define 
the gravitational attraction of the earth for a test particle located 
at any arbitrary position. The totality of such vectors is called 
a field, and the vectors themselves are called the field strengths 
or intensities of the field. 

In this example, the gravitational field strength g at a point 


The magnitude of this field is measured in units of acceleration 
(e.g., m/sec 2 ) and is given explicitly by the law of gravitation as 

g ._ C £E»_ 6 £e r (11 _43) 

where M is the mass of the earth, r the position vector of the 
point P relative to the center of the earth, and e r the unit vector 
in the direction of r. Equation (11-43) is valid at all points out- 
side the surface of an ideal spherical earth. 

One can generalize this for the field produced by an arbitrary 
distribution of matter, for which the field strength g as a func- 
tion of position describes quantitatively the gravitational field. 
The gravitational force exerted on an object of mass m by this 
field is then given by F = mg. 

This field description of forces is especially useful in specify- 
ing electromagnetic forces. The electric field produced by a 
charged particle or by a collection of such charged particles is 
described by the electric field strength or intensity S, where 

Z = * 

F is the vector force acting on a positive test charge of magnitude 
q, and £ depends on position. For electric fields produced by 
charges at rest, the situation is similar to the gravitational case. 
As an aid to visualizing the character of a force field, use is 
frequently made of the concept of a field line. Starting from an 
arbitrary point, we draw an infinitesimal line element in the 
direction of the field at that point. Being thus brought to a 
neighboring point in the field, we draw another line element in 

462 Conservative forces and motion in space 

the direction of the field at the new point, and so on. In the 
limit of making the line elements vanishingly short, we obtain 
a smooth curve, the tangent to which, at any point, is the direc- 
tion of the field at that point. This construct— which is the field 
line— has no real existence, but a vivid picture of the properties 
of a force field can be obtained by drawing a whole collection 
of such lines. 

Hand-in-hand with the concept of a line of force goes that 
of a line or surface of constant potential energy. We shall there- 
fore discuss this briefly in the next section. 


Besides its utility in connection with the dynamics of conservative 
systems, the concept of potential energy enables us to describe 
conservative fields of force quantitatively in a relatively simple 
fashion. The reason is that we can use the simple scalar field of 
potential energy to calculate the relatively complicated vector 
field of force. This calculation proceeds as follows. Suppose 
we know the potential energy U of a test particle at each point 
of space; i.e., we have a relation of the form U =f(x,y,z), 
where the single-valued function f(x, y, z) depends on the par- 
ticular field of force under consideration. If we wish to know at 
what points of space the test particle will have a given value of 
potential energy, say £/ , we set U = U and obtain an equation 
of the form 

f(x, y, z) = const. = Uo 

This is the equation of a surface, and this surface is called 
an energy eguipotenlial surface. There exists a whole family of 
these equipotential surfaces, one for each value of U(,. Since, 
by definition, it requires no work to move our test particle from 
one point to another on the same equipotential surface, it follows 
that the lines of force are everywhere perpendicular to the equi- 

We should draw attention to a distinction between two 
quantities here. Just as we define field as the force per unit mass 
(or charge, etc.) so we define potential (<p) as the potential energy 
per unit mass (or charge, etc). To take the specific case of gravi- 

■This section may be omilled without loss of continuity. 

463 Equipotential surfaces; poiential-encrgy gradicnts 

tation, we thus have the following paired quantities: gravitational 
force F (newtons) with gravitational potential energy U (joules), 
and gravitational field g (m/sec 2 ) with gravitational potential <p 
(mVsec 2 ). 

The complete array of field lincs and cquipotential surfaces 
(or, in two dimensions, equipotential lines) provides a graphic 
picture of a complete field pattern. In two dimensions we see 
two sets of curves which, however complicated their appearance 
may be, are everywhere orthogonal to one another. The gravita- 
tional field of a spherical object has a simple pattern, in which 
the field lines are radial lines and the equipotentials are a set of 
concentric spheres [Fig. ll-24(a)]. The field pattern due to 
two spheres close together is far less simple [see Fig. ll-24(b)]. 
(For one way of constructing such a diagram, see Problem 1 1-26.) 
In making drawings of the equipotentials, it is often convenient 

Fig. 1 1-24 (a) Equipotenlials and field lines due t o a sphere with a \/r 2 
force law. (b) Eauipolenlials and field lines due lo a syslem oflwo nearby 
spheres, of masses 2 M and M. 

464 Conservative forces and motion in space 

to draw them for equal successive increments of the potential 
(or potential energy); this makes the picture very informative, 
just like a contour map — which in effect it is (see Fig. 11-24). 

To obtain a complete specification of the force field, we 
must be able to get the magnitude of the force vector, as well 
as its direction, at every point of space. Consider a test particle 
at a point P and let it be displaced an amount ds to a neighboring 
point. Its potential energy will change by an amount 

dU = -F-ds F,ds 

This may be written in the form 

F* - - ~ (11-44) 


In words, the component of the force F in any direction 
equals the negative rate of change of potential energy with 
position in that direction. The spatial derivative on the right- 
hand side of Eq. (1 1-44) is called a direclional derivative, because 
its value depends on the direction in which ds is chosen at the 
point P. (Strictly speaking, we should be using the notation of 
partial derivatives: F, = —dU/ds.) If we move from P to a 
neighboring point on the same equipotential surface as that on 
which P lies, then dU/ds is zero for this direction. If, however, 
we move to a neighboring point not on the same equipotential 
surface as that containing P, dU/ds will be different from zero. 
That particular direction for which dU/ds has its maximum 
value at a given point defines the direction of the line of force 
at that point, and the magnitude of this maximum value of 
dU/ds is the magnitude of the vector force at the point in question. 

This maximum value of dU/ds, together with its associated 
direction, is called the gradient of the potential energy; it is a 
vector directed at right angles to the equipotential surface. In 
symbols, we write 

F = -grad U (11-45) 

To help clarify the idea of the gradient, consider a con- 
servative field in two dimensions. Here the equipotentials are 
lines, rather than surfaces as they would be in three dimensions. 
In Fig. 1 1-25 we show two equipotentials, one for U = U and 
one for U = l/ -f AU. Starting at P on U , we can move to the 
equipotential U + M/ by any of an infinite number of dis- 

465 Equipotential surfaces; potential-encrgy gradienls 

Fig. 11-25 Different 
paths between two 
neighboring equipo- 


StAT^l^' 1 



placements. However, for a given change of potential energy AU, 
one moves along a line of force to attain this change in the 
shortest possible displacement As. The rate of change of po- 
tential energy with position is maximum for this direction and 
this is the direction of the gradient of potential energy. This is 
indicated in Fig. 1 1-25, where three directions from P are shown. 
It is clear that As is shorter in length than either As! or As 2 and 
hence that AU/As is larger than AU/As x or AU/As 2 . 


We now turn our attention to the problem of the motion of 
particles in a conservative field of force. We have of course 
already discussed a number of problems involving motion under 
gravity, but here we shall try to indicate the value of the energy 
method as it applies to more complex situations. 

If the only force acting on a particle is that due to the field, 
the law of conservation of mechanical energy provides a first 
step in solving for the motion. This law, expressed as 

$mo 2 + U(x,y,z) = E 


where v 2 = v x 2 + v u 2 + v, 2 , does not, however, contain the 
whole story. It is the result of combining three statements of 
Newton's law as applied to the three independent coordinate 
directions, and the synthesis of these three vector equations into 
one scalar equation involves the discarding of information that 
in principle is still available to us. Given that U is a conservative 
potential, we can always find its gradient and hence the vector 
force [Eq. (I l— 45)]. With this, plus the initial conditions (values 
of r and v at t = 0) everything that one needs for a solution 
of the problem is provided. 

Our interest here, however, lics in taking advantage of the 

Conservative forees and motion i n. spacc 

energy-conservation equation as far as possible, and supple- 
menting it with whatever other information may be necessary. 
This extra information may take the form of the explicit use of 
one or two of the Newton's Iaw statements, as we shall see in 
the example about to be discussed. Or it may, in suitable cir- 
cumstances, be contained in a conservation law for quantities 
besides energy — in particular, angular momentum. The ex- 
ploitation of this latter property is one of the principal concerns 
of Chapter 13. 

As a good example of the methods we shall consider the 
motion of a charged particle in a combined electric and magnetic 
field. Suppose we have a pair of parallel metal plates mounted 
inside an evacuated tube and connected to a battery as shown in 
Fig. 11-26, so that a uniform electric field 8 (= V/d) exists 
between the plates. The plates are placed between the poles of a 
magnet that produces a uniform magnetic field B in a direction 
perpendicular to the page. We shall assume that electrons start 
out with negligible energy and velocity from the lower plate. 
This could, for example, be arranged by giving the lower plate a 
photosensitive coating and shining light onto it, as in a com- 
mercial phototube. 

Consider one electron of charge q = — e emitted at O. It 
will be accelerated vertically by a constant force equal to eV/d 
directed along the positive y axis, and will be deflected into the 
path indicated in the figure. Since the magnetic deflecting force, 
always acting perpendicular to the particle's velocity, does no 
work and hence does not directly affect the particle's energy, the 
statement of energy conservation can be written simply as follows: 

Fig. 11-26 Motion of an electron in vacuum under the 
combined action of electric and magnetic fields. 

Adi Motion in conservative fields 

B into 
the page 


Fig. 11-27 Analysis ofthe 
magnelic force into compo- 
nenlS associated with the 
separate x and y components 


where we have chosen V [= — (eV/d)y] equal to zero for y = O, 
i.e., at the bottom plate where the kinetic energy at y = O is 

As statcd at the beginning of this section, we need more 
information to determine the motion. Since the electric force is 
directed along the y axis, the only x component of force on the 
electron is the x component of the magnetic force. To evaluate 
this force, think of the velocity vector of the electron at some 
point of its path resolved into x and y components (Fig. 11-27). 
The component of magnetic force associated with v x in this 
situation is parallel to the y axis and does not concern us here, 
but the velocity component v u gives rise to a magnetic force 
component F x given by 

and Newton's law of motion for the x component of motion is 

ev v B=m^ (11-48) 

Equations (11-47) and (11-48) can be solved for the motion of 
the particle, as follows: 

Since v„ = dy/dt, Eq. (11-48) can be written as 

eB dy = m do x 

or, integrated, 

mv x = eBy (\\-49) 

since v x = O when y = 0. Now we use the value of v x from 
Eq. (11-49) in the energy equation (11-47) and get 

468 Conservative forees and mol ion in space 

nwy2 + 



y = 


This is of the form of the energy equation in one dimension; 
the total energy is zero and the effective potential energy U'(y) 
is given by 

U'(y) = - e -jy + hm 


This effective potential-energy curve is shown in Fig. 11-28. It 
is precisely of the form of a harmonic oscillator potential (centered 
on a point at a certain positive value of y) and its characteristic 
angular frequency co is given by 


O) = — 


This implies a very interesting result. Equation (11-50) and 
Fig. 1 1-28 show that, as y increases from zero, the kinetic energy 
of the electron increases to some maximum value and then de- 
creases again. Mathematically, Eq. (11-50) defines a maximum 
value of y given by putting v u = 0: 

m V 

y»** - eB 2d 

If this is less than the separation d between the plates (a con- 
dition that can be obtained, as the above equation shows, by 
making B large enough), the y displacement of the electron will 
perform simple harmonic motion with the angular frequency w 
and with an amplitude A equal to £.y max . Taking t = at the 
instant the electron leaves the lower plate, we can put 

Fig. 11-28 Effective 
potential-energy curve 
for the y component 
of motion in the 
arrangement of Fig. 

469 Mol ion in conscrvativc fields 

Fig. 11-29 Cycloidal 
path ofelectron be- 
tween charged parallel 
plates in a magnetic 

y = /1(1 - cosco/) 


What about the x component of the motion? If we look at 
Eq. (1 1-49), we see that v x is proportional to y. Since y is always 
positive, v z is always in the positive x direction. When one 
couples this with the harmonic oscillation along y, one sees that 
the path of the electron is a succession of rabbit-like hops, as 
shown in Fig. 11-29. Specifically, we have, from Eq. (11-49), 

dx eB 

— y 

d t m y 


where w is the same angular frequency, eB/m, that we introduced 
earlier. Thus, substituting the explicit expression for y from 
Eq. (ll-51a), we have 



= a>/4(l — cos tor) 

Integrating this and putting x = O at f = O we then find that 

.v = A(ut - sinwr) (11-51 b) 

Equations (11-5 la) and (ll-51b), taken together, show that the 
path of the electron is in fact a cycloid— just as if it were on the 
rim of a wheel of radius A rolling along the x axis. 


We mentioned earlier how the conservative properties of a force 
field may be useful even in circumstances in which dissipative 
forces are also present. The slow decay of the orbits of artificial 
earth satellites provides a particularly interesting example of this. 
We all know that a satellite placed in orbit a few hundred 
miles above the earth's surface will eventually come down. The 

470 Conservative forces and motion in spacc 

Fig. 11-30 (a) Earth 
satellite spiraling 
inward as it loses 
energy. (b) Small 
element of the path 
sliown in (a). 

descent is, however, spread over many thousands of revolutions. 
Thus, although the actual path is a continuous inward spiral, 
as shown in Fig. 1 l-30(a), the motion during a single revolution 
is very nearly a closcd orbit, which we will take to be circular 
for simpiicity. The statement of Newton's law at any stage is 
thus given, with extremely little error, by the usual equation for 
uniform circular motion: 

F = 

GMm _ mo 

r* r 

Thus the kinetic energy at any particular value of r is given by 


„ . 2 G Mm 

K = %mu = 


This exposes a very curious feature. As the orbital radius gets 
smaller, the kinetic energy increases — in other words, the satellite 
speeds up. This happens in spite of the fact that the motion of 
the satellite is continually opposed by a resistive force. If there 
were no such force the orbital radius and the speed would re- 
main constant. 

We know, however, that the satellite must have lost energy, 
and the amount of this loss is well defined. This becomes clear 
when we consider the potential energy: 

U= - 


471 The eflcct of dissipative forccs 

The total energy, E, when the orbit radius is r, is given by 

E-K+V--^ (11-53) 

As r decreases, E becomes more strongly negative. We may note 
the following relationships in any such circular orbit: 

E= -K=\U (11-54) 

But still one may wonder: Why does the satellite accelerate in 
the face of a resistive force? Figure 1 l-30(b) suggests the answer. 
The line AB represents a small segment, of length As, of the path 
of the satellite. The starting point A lies on a circle of radius r; 
the end point B lies on a circle of radius r + Ar (Ar being actually 
negative). We greatly exaggerate the magnitude of Ar, for the 
sake of clarity. We then see that as the satellite travels from 
A to B, it feels a component of the gravitational attraction along 
its path. If the resistive force is R(p), the total force acting on 
the satellite in the direction of As is given by 

_ GMm 

F = — — cos a — R(v) 

Thus, in the distance As, the gain of kinetic energy, equal to the 
work F As, is given by 

AK = F As = ^^Ascosa - R(v)As 

In the first term on the right, we can substitute 

As cos a = — Ar 
In the second term on the right, we can substitute 

As = v Al 

If we also put AK = mu Av, we arrivc at the following equation: 

GMm . „, . , 

»10 Ao = — Ar — R(u)u At 

However, by diffcrcntiation of both sides of Eq. (1 1-52) we have 

GMm . 
nwAv = - -2rT~ Ar 

Usingthisresult, wecan substitute for the value of —(GMm/r 2 )Ar 

472 ( onscrvairvc forees and motion in space 

in the previous equation, and we get 

nwAv = 2mv&o — R(v)vAt 

Ao = R(v) 
At m 

This is a most intriguing result. The positive sign is not an error. 
The rate of increase of speed of the satellite is directly propor- 
tional to the magnitude of the resistive force that opposes its 
motion! The seeming paradox is resolved when we recognize 
that the resistance, by changing the orbital path from a circle to 
an inward spiral, acts as an agent that allows the gravitational 
force to do positioe work on the satellite, the amount of which is 
numerically twice as great as the amount of negative work done 
by the resistive force itself. 


The particular case of the inverse-square field of force due to a 
point mass or charge is so important that we will append here a 
brief discussion of Gauss's Iaw, which is a compact and powerful 
statement of the inverse-square law. Since we are primarily con- 
cerned with mechanies here, we shall diseuss the problem in 
terms of the gravitational rather than the electric field. We 
begin with a very elementary observation. As we have seen, the 
gravitational field g due to a point mass M is given by the equation 

.. GM 

This field acts at every point of the surface of a sphere of radius r 
centered on M. If we use the convention that the positive direc- 
tion is radially outward, then the radial component of g multi- 
plied by the total surface area of the sphere gives us a quantity <f> 
defined as follows: 

<t> = 47rr 2 £ r = -4irGM 

We shall call <t> the flux of the gravitational field g through the 
surface of the sphere. 

■This seetion may be omitted without loss of continuity. 

473 Gauss's law 

Fig. 11-31 (a) Gaussian surface enclosing a parlicle of 
mass M. There is a net gravitational ftux due to M. 
(b) Gaussian surface nol enclosing M'. The net flux 
due to M' is zero. 

Now a noteworthy property of <j> is that it is indcpcndent 
of r. If we had two spheres of different radii, r x and r 2 , centered 
on M, the flux of g would bc the same through both. We can 
extend this result to the case of a closed surface of any shape 
surrounding the mass [Fig. 11-31 (a)]. If at an arbitrary point 
on this surface the outward normal to the surface makes an angle 
B with r, as shown, we can rcsolve g into orthogonal components, 
parallel to the surface and along the normal. If we think of the 
flux literally as a kind of flow of the g field aeross the surface, it 
is only the normal component that contributes. Multiplying 
this by the element of area dS, we thus have 

d<$, = - — cos e dS 

Now dS cos 6 can be equated to the projection of dS perpen- 
dicular to r, and the quoticnt dS cos O/r 2 is the element of solid 
angle, dil, subtended at M by dS. Thus we can put 

d<f> = -GMcKl 

The total flux of g through the surface, as defined in this way, 
is then obtained by integrating over all the contributions dQ. 
But this means simply including the complete solid angle, Air. 
Thus we have 

-- I ,','o -GM dtt = -4irGM 

474 Conservative forees and motion in spacc 

exactly as for a sphere. If we consider the situation for a point 
mass M' outside the surface, the result is quite different. This 
time a cone of small angle dti intersects the surface twice; the 
contribution to the flux is given by 

d<t> = -G M' 

'dSi cos 6i dS 2 cos 2 



It is not hard to verify that the two terms inside the parentheses 
are equal to — dQ and -\-dQ, respectively, so that d<t> = 0, from 
which it follows that the total flux <f> is also zero in this case. 

One can formalize these calculations a little by representing 
an element of surface area as a vector, dS, with a magnitude equal 
to dS and a direction along the outward normal, as shown in 
Fig. 11-31. The element of flux, d<f>, is then defined as equal 
to the scalar product g • dS. It is then apparent that, in Fig. 
11-31 (b), gi • dSi and g 2 • dS 2 are of opposite sign. 

Suppose now that we have a number of masses, mu m 2< 
mz, . . ■ , inside a surface of some kind, as in Fig. 1 l-32(a). 
Their gravitational fields combine to produce a resultant gravita- 
tional field g at any point P: 

g = gi + g2 + g3 -\ 

The total gravitational flux is then given by 

<t> = J g • dS 

and we see that this is simply the sum of the contributions from 
the individual masses: 

Fig. 11-32 (a) Basis 
of calculating the 
gravitational flux due 
to an arbitrary collec- 
tion of masses inside a 
given surface. (b) The 
addition of external 
masses does not 
change the net flux, 
although it will alter 
the local field intensi- 

475 Gauss's law 

■ / gi • dS + I g 2 • dS H- / g 3 • rfS + 

= —4irG(mi + ntz + t»i + • • •) 

Thus this total flux depends only on the total enclosed mass, 
regardless of how it may be distributed : 

<t> = — 4irG A/ to t a i 


If, as in Fig. ll-32(b), we suppose that additional masses m[, 

m' 2 are placed outside the surface, our previous calculation 

shows that these contribute nothing to the total gravltational 
flux through the surface. Thus Eq. (11-55) emerges as a com- 
pletely general result; it is known as Gauss's law (or theorem), 
and its validity depends completely on the fact that the law of 
force is an exact inverse-square law. An exact parallel to it 
holds for electrostatics, in which context Gauss, in fact, first 
developed it. 

If a physical system has certain obvious symmetries, Gauss's 
theorem leads at once to important conclusions about field 
strengths. We shall consider a few examples, some of which we 
have already treated by other methods. 

Field outside a sphere 

Suppose we want to know the gravitational field at a point P, 
outside an isolated sphere of mass M at a distance r from its 
center [Fig. 1 1— 33(a)]. If the mass distribution within the sphere 

Fig. 1 1-33 Use of 
Gauss's law to calcu- 
lale the gracitalional 
field of a solid sphere 
(a) at exterior points, 
and (b) at interior 

476 Conservative forccs and motion in space 

is symmetrical— i.c, if the density of matter is the same at all 
points at the same distance from the center of the sphere— then 
the gravitational field g itself has the same strength at all points 
on a spherical surface of radius r. Thus, if we draw a "Gaussian 
surface" in the form of a sphere of radius r, the total gravita- 
tional flux is given by 

# = 4irr 2 g r = -A-kGM 


g r = - -5- at once 

The result is of course entirely familiar, but the point to notice 
is that, once we have Gauss's general theorem, the process of 
carrying out an explicit integration over the mass distribution, 
as we did in Chapter 8, becomes unnecessary. 

Field inside a sphere 

An exactly similar treatment holds for the other familiar problem 
of the gravitational field inside a spherically symmetric mass 
distribution [Fig. 11— 33(b)]. Gauss's theorem tells us at once 
that, if we imagine a spherical surface of radius r < R, the 
material outside this surface contributes nothing to the flux of g 
through the surface. Thus, if the mass enclosed within the 
surface of radius r is m(r), we can at once deduce that 


The assumption of spherical symmetry throughout the system, 
outside as well as inside the radius r, is, however, essential. 
Otherwise the value of g may be different at different points on a 
spherical surface, and even though the total flux still has no 
contribution from exterior material, the field strength at in- 
dividual points will be affected. Thus we must assume, as in the 
first example, that the sphere is effectively isolated, i.e., far from 
any outside masses. 

Field due to afiat sheet 

Suppose we have an infinite sheet of matter, of surface density <r 
(mass per unit area). Symmetry in this case tells us that the field 
must be everywhere normal to the sheet and that it has the same 

477 Applications of Gauss's theorem 

Fig. 11-34 Use ofGauss's law to calculate the gravi- 
talional field ofaftat sheet ofmatler. 

magnitude on the two sides (Fig. 11-34). We can construct a 
Gaussian surface for this problem in the form of a right cylinder, 
with ends of arbitrary shape but the same area A. Then there 
is no flux of g through the curved sides of the cylinder. The 
enclosed mass is just a A, so the total gravitational flux passing 
through the surface is — AtrGaA. But, by Gauss's theorem, this 
is equal to the field strength g multiplied by the total area of the 
two ends. Thus we have 

2 Ag = -A-kGiA 


g = — 2ttGV 


The strength of the field is thus entirely independent of the 
distance from the sheet of matter, assuming this to be indeed 
of unlimited extent. 

In terms of gravitational systems, this example is not very 
realistic. But the result is highly relevant in electrostatics, where 
distributions of electric charge over large plane areas are fre- 
quently met. The parallel-plate capacitor is a prime example, 
and the constant field at all points between the charged plates 
in the Millikan experiment, for example, can at once be under- 
stood in the light of the above calculation. 


11-1 A particle of mass m slides without friction on a wire that is 
curved into a vertical circle (see the figure). The position of the particle 
can be described in lerms of 0, or in terms of the arc length s, or by 
the vertical distance h that it has fallen. 

(a) Consider the force that acts on the particle along the direc- 
tion of its path at any point, and show that the work done on the 
particle as it moves through an arc length ds is given by 

dW = F t ds = mgR sin d dd 

(b) By integrating this expression from d = to 6 = do, show 
that the work done is W = mgR(\ — cos 0o), and express this result 
in terms of the vertical distance h that the particle has descended. 

11-2 Two blocks, of masses m and 2m, rest on two frictionless planes 

478 Conservative forccs and motion in space 

inclined at angles of 60° and 30°, respectively, and are connected by a 
string through an eyelet of negligible friction (see the figure). Using 
energy methods, find the magnitude of the acceleration of the masses, 
and deduce the tension in the connecting string. 

11-3 Show that if a mass on the end of a string is allowed to swing 
down in a circular arc from a position in which the string is initially 
horizontal (and the mass is at rest), then at the lowest point of the 
swing the tension in the string is three times as great as when the mass 
simply hangs there. (This result is quoted by Huygens at the end of 
his book on pendulum clocks, published in 1673.) 

11-4 A pendulum bob of mass m, at the end of a string of length /, 
starts from rest at the position shown in the figure, with the string at 
60° to the vertical. At the lowest point of the arc the bob strikes a 
previously stationary block, of mass nm, that is on a frictionless hori- 
zontal surface. The collision is perfectly elastic. 

(a) What is the specd of the bob just before the impact occurs? 

(b) What is the tension in the string at this instant? 

(c) What velocity is given to the block by the impact ? 

(d) In the oscillations of the pendulum after the collision, 
what maximum angle 6 to the vertical does the string make? (Obtain 
your answer in the form cos 6 = • • • .) 

11-5 A student is assigned a "conservation of momentum" experi- 
ment in which two masses, mi and m% are suspended from strings 
of length /. Mass m\ is pulled aside a horizontal distance Xi and 
released. It strikes m? and sticks to it, after which the combined mass 
swings out to some final position x/. The student objects that mo- 
mentum is obviously not conserved in this proccss. It is zero initially, 
increases, and then decreases again to zero. The student also claims 
that energy is not conserved. Analyze carefully what actually goes on 
in this experiment, so that you are in a position to answer the student's 

11-6 A small ball of putty, of mass m, is attached to a string of 
length / fastened to an upright on a wooden board resting on a hori- 
zontal table (see the figure). The combined mass of the board and 
upright is M. The friction coefficient between the board and the table 

479 Problems 

is fi. The ball is released from rest with the string in a horizontal 
position. It hits the upright in a completely inelastic collision. While 
the ball swings down, the board does not move. 

(a) How far does the board move after the collision? 

(b) What is the minimum value that n must have to prevent the 
board from moving to the lcft while the ball swings down? Assume 
that m <3C M, which gives the critical condition at 6 ~ 45°. 

11-7 An object of mass m slides on a frictionless loop-the-loop 
apparatus. The object is released from rest at a height h above the 
top of the loop (see the figure). 

(a) What is the magnitude and direction of the force exerted on 
the object by the track as the object passes through the point A ? 

(b) Draw an isolation diagram showing the forces acting on 
the object at point B, and find the magnitude of the radial acceleration 
at that point. 

(c) Show that the object must start from h > r/2 to success- 
fully complete the loop. 

(d) For h < r/2 the object will begin to fail away from the 
track before reaching the top of the circle. Show that this happens at 
a position such that 3 cosa = 2 -|- 2h/r, where a is the angular dis- 
tance from the (upward) vertical. 

11-8 A ball of mass m hangs at the end of a string of length /. It is 
struck so as to start out horizontally from this position with a speed vo- 

(a) What must Do be if the ball is just able to travel through a 
complete circular path ? 

(b) If l-o = \/4g/ (so that the ball could just rise through the 
height 2/ if projected vertically), what angle does the string make with 
the vertical when the ball begins to fail away from its circular path? 

(c) In situation (b), analyze the subsequent motion, assuming 
no losses of total mechanical energy. 

11-9 A mass slides down a very smooth curved chute as shown. At 
what horizontal distance from the end of the chute does it hit the 
ground ? 

480 Conservativc forces and motion in spacc 

11-10 A daredevil astronomer stands at the top of his observatory 
dome (see figure) wearing roller skates, and starts with negligible 
velocity to coast down over thc dome surface. 

(a) Neglecting friction, at what angle does he leave the dome's 

(b) If he were to start with an initial velocity t»o, at what angle 
would he leave the dome ? 

(c) For thc observatory shown, how far from thc base should 
his assistant position a net to break his fail, in situation (a)? Evaluate 
your answer for R = 8 m, and use g =* 10 m/sec 2 . 

11-11 A pendulum of length L is held at an angle a from the vertical. 
A peg is located in the path of swing of the string as shown in the 
figure. The pendulum is released from rest. 

(a) Ifa = 60°,/3 = 30°, and r = Ly/3/4, what is the maximum 
angle with the vertical that the bob will reach ? 

(b) Show that the string will bucklc during thc bob's aseent 
when < (rcos/3 — Lcosa) < 3(L — r)/2. At what angle B does 
this buckling oecur? 

481 Problcms 



(c) A carnival skill game involves such a pendulum and peg 
apparatus. A prize is awarded for causing the bob to strike the peg. 
In the game, L, r, and are fixed ; the contestant releases the bob from 
rest at any desired a. Find the value of a for which a prize will be won. 
(Express your answer in the form cosor = • • • .) 

11-12 A frictionless airtrack is deformed into the parabolic shape 
y = \Cx 2 . An object oscillates along the track in almost perfect 
simple harmonic motion. 

(a) If the period is 30sec, by what distance is the track at 
x = ±2 m higher than at x = 0? 

(b) If the amplitude of oscillation is 2 m, how long does it 
take for the object to pass from x = —0.5 m to x = +1.5 m traveling 
in the positive x direction ? (The description of SHM as a projection 
of uniform circular motion is useful for this.) 

11-13 A pendulum clock keeps perfect time at ground level. Ap- 
proximately how many seconds per week would it gain or lose at a 
height of 20 m above this level? (Assume a simple pendulum, with 
T = 2Tr\/I/g. Earth's radius = 6.4 X 10 6 m. 1 week ~ 6 X 10 5 sec.) 

11-14 Two identical, and equally charged, ping-pong balls are hung 
from the same point by strings of length L (see the figure). 

(a) Given that the mass of each is m and that the equilibrium 
position is as shown in the figure, what is the charge on each? (Recall 
that the electrostatic force between two charges at a separation r is 
given by F = kqiq2/r' 2 .) 

(b) Suppose that the balls are displaced slightly toward each 
other by the same amount. Make appropriatc approximations and 
describe the subsequent motion. Find an expression for the frequency 
of oscillations. 

(c) On the other hand, if the ping-pong balls are displaced 
slightly in the same direction and by the same amount, what will the 
subsequent motion be? In this second case, does it matter whether 
they are charged or mcrely held apart by a massless rod? 

11-15 (a) Show that free fail in the earth's gravitational field from 
infinity results in the same velocity at the surface of the earth that 
would be achieved by a free fail from a height H = R B (= radius of 

482 Conservative forces and motion in space 

earth) under a constant acceleration equal to the value of g at the earth's 

(b) Show that the speed at the earth's surface of an object 
dropped from height,/; (/i « R K ) is given approximately by 

| = v - (2*A)i« 

H i) 

(c) Verify the statement in the text (p. 454) that the speed 
needed for escape from the surface of a gravitating sphere is t'o\/2, 
where co is the speed of a particle skimming the surface of the sphere 
in circular orbit. 

11-16 A physicist plans to determine the mass of the earth by ob- 
serving the changc in period of a pendulum as he deseends a mine 
shaft. He knows the radius R of the earth, and he measures the den- 
sity p s of the crustal material that he penetrates, the distance h he 
deseends, and the fractional change (AT/T) in the pendulum's period. 

(a) What is the mass of the earth in terms of these measure- 
ments and the earth's radius? 

(b) Suppose that the mean over-all density of the earth is twice 
the mean density of the portion above 3 km. (This supposition is 
actually rather accurate.) How many seconds per day would a pendulum 
clock at the bottom of a deep mine (3 km) gain, if it had kept time 
accurately at the surface? 

11-17 The figure shovvs a system of two uniform, thin-walled, con- 
centric spherical shells. The smaller shell has radius R and mass M, 
the larger has radius 2/? and mass 2M, and the point P is their common 
center. A point mass m is situated at a distance r from P. 

(a) What is the gravitational foree F(r) these shells exert on m 
in each of the three ranges of r: < r < R, R < r < 2R, r > 2R? 

(b) What is the gravitational potential energy of the point 
mass m when it is at P? (Take the potential energv to be zero when m 
is infinitely far from P.) 

(c) If the particle is released from rest very far away from the 
spheres, what is its speed when it reaches P'! (Assume that the particle 
can pass freely through the walls of the shells.) 

11-18 Assume the moon to be a sphere of uniform density with 
radius 1740 km and mass 7.3 X 10 22 kg. Imagine that a straight 
smooth tunnel is bored through the moon so as to connect any two 

483 Problems 

points on its surface. 

(a) Show that the motion of objects along this tunnel under 
the action of gravity would be simple harmonic. 

(b) Calculate the period of oscillation. 

(c) Compare this with the period of a satellite traveling around 
the moon i n a circular orbit at the moon's surface. 

11-19 The escape specd from the surface of a sphere of mass M and 
radius R is v e = (2GM/R) 1 ' 2 ; the mean speed v of gas molecules of 
mass m at temperature T is about (3kT/m) l/2 , where k (= 1.38 X 
10 -23 J/°K) is Boltzmann's constant. Detailed calculation shows that 
a planetary atmosphere can retain for astronomical times (10 9 ycars) 
only those gases for which D J$ 0.2y e . Using the data below, find 
which, if any, of the gases H2, NH3, N2, and CO2 could be retained 
for such periods by the earth; by the moon; by Mars. M E = 
6.0 X 10 24 kg, R E = 6.4 X 10 3 km, T B = 250°K. For the moon, 
M = Mu/Si, R = 0.27Rn, and T = T K . For Mars, M = O.llAfe, 
R = 0.53* s , and T - 0.8T E . 

11-20 A double-star system consists of two stars, of masses M and 
2M, separatcd by a distance D center to center. Draw a graph showing 
how the gravitational potential energy of a particle would vary with 
position along a straight line that passes through the centers of both 
stars. What can you infer about the possible motions of a particle 
along this line? 

11-21 A double-star system is composed of two identical stars, each 
of mass M and radius R, the centers of which are separated by a 
distance of 5R. A particle leaves the surface of one star at the point 
nearest to the other star and escapes to an effectively infinite distance. 

(a) Ignoring the orbital motion of the two stars about one 
another, calculate the escape speed of the particle. 

(b) Assuming that the stars always present the same face to 
one another (like the moon to the earth), calculate the orbital speed 
of the point from which the particle is emitted. How would the exis- 
tence of this orbital motion affect the escape problem? 

11-22 The earth and the moon are separated by a distance D = 
3.84 X 10 8 m. Ignoring their motion about their common center of 
mass, but taking into account both of their gravitational fields, answer 
the following questions: 

(a) How much work must be done on a 100-kg payload for it 
to reach a height 1000 km above the earth's surface in the direction 
of the moon ? 

(b) Calculate the diiTerence in potential energy for this mass 
between the moon's surface and the earth's surface. 

(c) Calculate the necessary initial kinetic energy to get the 
payload to the moon. It must be greater than the potential difference 

484 Conservalivc forces and motion in space 

given in (b) because the payload must overcome a "potential hill." 
Find the location of the top of this hill and compute the potential 
difference from the earth to it. 

11-23 Two stars, each of mass M, orbit about their center of mass. 
The radius of their common orbit is r (their separation is 2r). A 
planetoid of mass m (« M) happens to move along the axis of the 
system (the line perpendicular to the orbital plane which intersects 
the center of mass), as shown in the figure. 

(a) Calculate directly the force exerted on the planetoid if it is 
displaced a distance z from the center of mass. 

(b) Calculate the gravitational potential energy as a function of 
this displacement z and use it to verify the result of part (a). 

(c) Find approximate expressions for the potential energy and 
the force in the cases zy> r and z « r. 

(d) Show that if the planetoid is displaced slightly from the 
center of mass, simple harmonic motion occurs. Compare the period 
T P of this oscillation with the orbital period 7"o of the binary system. 

11-24 A frictionless wire is stretched between the origin and the point 
x = a, y = b in a horizontal plane. A bead on the wire starts out 
from the origin and moves under the action of a force that varies with 
position. Find the kinetic energy with which the bead arrives at the 
point (a, b) if 

(a) The components of the force are F x = k\x, F y = kiy- 

(b) The components of the force are F x = kiy, F„ = A: 2* 
(with ki, *2 >0). 

In one case the force is conservative, in the other case it is not. By 
considering a different path — e. g., from (0, 0) to (a, 0) and then from 
(a, 0) to (a, b) — verify which is which. 

11-25 The nuclear pari of the interaction of two nucleons (protons or 
neutrons) is described pretty well by a potential V(r) = —\e~ r/r o/r 
when the separation r is greatcr than 1 F (1 F = 10~ ls m). In this 
expression, /-o = 1.4 F and X = 70 MeV-F. (The potential was 
proposed by H. Yukawa and is named after him.) 

(a) Find an expression for the nuclear force that acts on 
(each of) two nucleons separated by r > 1 F. 

(b) Evaluate this force for two protons 1.4 F apart, and com- 
pare this with the repulsive Coulomb force at that separation. 

(c) Estimate the separation at which the nuclear force has 

485 Problem s 

dropped to 1% of its value a t r = 1.4 F. What is the Couiomb force 
at this separation? 

(d) The last result indicates why the Yukawa potential is not 
part of our macroscopic experience. Note that ro characterizes the 
range of distance over which the interaction is important. In contrast 
to the nuclear force, gravitational and Couiomb forces have been 
called forces of infinite range. Indicate why such a description is 

11-26 In Fig. ll-24(b) is shown a plot of gravitational equipotentia!s 
and field lines for two spheres of masses 2M and M. One way of 
developing this diagram is as follows. We know that the gravitational 
potential at any point P is given by 

G(2M) G(M) 

where n and r 2 are measurcd from the centers of the spheres. An 
equipotential is defined by <pp = constant. In order to construct 
such equipotcntials, draw a set of circles, with the sphere of mass M 
as center, such that the values of 1/ra are in arithmetic progression — 

e.g., IA2 = 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5 Then with the sphere of mass 

2M as center, draw a set of circles with radii r\ twice as great as the 
values of r 2 . Since <p P ~ (2/n) + (IA2), the corresponding circles 
in each pair represent equal contributions to <p by 2M and M. The 
two sets of circles have a number of intersections, and each intersection 
corresponds to a well-defined value of <fp. For instance, with 10r2 = 
2.85 units and 10n = 10 units, we have <pe ~ (2/1.0) + (1/0.285) = 
5.5. But <pp ~ 5.5 is obtained also at the intersections of other pairs 
of circles as follows: r 2 = 0.33, n = 0.80; r 2 = 0.40, n = 0.67; 
/•2 = 0.67, n = 0.50. Joining these intersections having the same 
value of (2/n) + (1/ra) gives us an equipotential, and other equi- 
potentials can be constructed in the same way. Once the equipo- 
tentials are obtained, the field lines can be drawn as lines everywhere 
normal to the equipotentials. 

11-27 A science fiction story concerned a space probe that was re- 
trieved after passing near a neutron star. The unfortunate monkey 
that rode in the probe was found to be dismembered. The conclusion 
reached was that the strong gravity gradient (dg/dr) which the probe 
had experienced had pulled the monkey apart. Given that the probe 
had passed within 200 km of the surface of a neutron star of mass 
10 33 g (about half the sun's mass) and radius 10 km, was this explana- 
tion reasonable? (The probe was in free fail at the time.) 

11-28 A straight chute is to be used to transport articles a given 
horizontal distance /. The vertical drop of the chute can be freely 
chosen. The articles are to arrivc at the top of the chute with negligiblc 

486 Conservativc forces and motion in. space 

velocity and the chute is to be chosen such that the transit time is a 

(a) If the surfacc is frictionless, what is the angle of the chute 
for which the time is minimized? 

(b) What is the corresponding angle if the coefficient of fric- 
tion is m? 

(c) If a playground slide were designed to give minimum dura- 
tion of ride for given horizontal displacement, and if the coefficient 
of friction of the child-slide surface is 0.2, what angle would the slide 
make with the horizontal? (Ignore the curved portion at the lower 
end of the slide.) 

(d) If the optimizaiion problem of (a) is encountered and if 
curved chutcs are allowed, can you guess roughly what form the best 
design would have? 

11-29 The magnetic force exerted on a particle of charge q and mass m 
traveling in a uniform magnetic field B (which is constant in time) is 
given by F = kqs X B (where the constant k = 1 in the MKS system). 

(a) Show that the work done by such a force on the particle is 
zero for arbitrary particle motion. 

(b) Situations arise in which a moving charged particle is 
slowed by a force of constant magnitude F D and of direction opposite 
to the instantaneous velocity. (For example, the ionization of atoms 
along the track of a charged particle produces an almost constant 
energy loss per unit distance, corresponding to a constant retarding 
force.) Show that if a particle has speed eo at / = 0, thcn for / > 
its speed will be given by u(t) = vo — Fnt/tn until t = /huo/Fd, after 
which time the particle will remain motionless. Note that the presence 
of a magnetic field will not affect this result. 

(c) Under the action of a magnetic force alone, a particle with 
an initial velocity vo (normal to B) describes a circle of radius r = 
moo/kgB with a circular frequency o = kgB/m. Show that a particle 
subject also to the force described in (b) moves inward along a spiral 
and that the number of circuits it makes in the spiral before it comes 
to rest is given by {kqBoa/2irFti). 

11-30 (a) Obtain an expression for the gravitational field due to a 
thin disk (thickncss d, radius R, and density p) at a distance h above 
the center of mass of the disk. In calculating the field, assume the 
surface density a = pel to be concentrated in a disk of negligible 
thickness a distance h beneath the test point. This will give an accurate 
result whenever h^> d, and reduces the complexity of the caleulation. 
Note that for R — * « , the caleulation agrees with the predietion of 
Gauss's theorem, as it must. 

(b) Express the field obtained in part (a) as a fraetion of 2irGcr 
for the cases R = 2h, R = 5h, and R = 25h. 

(c) How many seconds per year would a pendulum clock gain 

487 Problcms 

when suspended with the bob 5 cm above a lead floor 1 cm thick, if it 
keeps correct time in the absence of the floor? 

11-31 Any mass of mattcr has a gravitational "self-energy" arising 
from the gravitational attraction among its parts. 

(a) Show that the gravitational self-energy of a uniform sphere 
of mass M and radius R is equal to -3GM 2 /5R. You can do this 
either by calculating the potential energy of the sphere directly, inte- 
grating over the interactions between all possible pairs of thin spherical 
shells within the sphere (and remembering that each shell is counted 
twice in this calculation) or, perhaps more simply, by imagining the 
sphere to be built up from scratch by the addition of successive layers 
of matter brought in from infinity. 

(b) Calculate the order of magnitude of the gravitational self- 
energy of the earth. Check where this lies on the scale of energies 
displayed in Table 10-1. 

488 Conservativc forces and motion in space 

Part III 

Some special topics 

Whenfirst studying mechanics one has the impression that 
everything in this branch ofscience is simple, fundamental 
and sett/edfor all time. One would hardly suspect the 
existence ofan important clue which no one noticedfor 
three hundred years. The neglected clue is connected with 
one of the fundamental concepts of mechanics — that ofmass. 


The Evolution ofPhysics (1938) 


Inertial forces and 
noninertial frames 

imagine that you are sitting in a car on a very smooth road. 
You are holding a heavy package. The car is moving, but you 
cannot see the speedometer from where you sit. Ali at once you 
get the feeling that the package, instead of being just a dead 
weight on your knees, has begun to push backward horizontally 
on you as well. Even though the package is not in contact with 
anything except yourself, the effect is as if a force were being 
applied to it and transmitted to you as you hold it still with 
respect to yourself and the car. If you did not restrain the package 
in this way, it would in fact be pushed backward. You notice 
that this is what happens to a mascot that has been hanging at 
the end of a previously vertical string attached to the roof of 
the car. 

How do you intcrpret these observations? If you have any 
previous experience of such phenomena, you will have no hesita- 
tion in saying that they are associated with an increase of velocity 
of the car — i.e., with a positive acceleration. Even if this were 
your first experience of this type, but if you had a well-developed 
acquaintance with Newton's laws, you could reach the same 
conclusion. An acceleration of the car calls for an acceleration 
of everything connected with it; the acceleration of the package 
requires, through F = ma, a force of the appropriate size supplied 
by your hands. Nonetheless, it does feel just as if the package 
itself is somehow subjected to an extra force— a "force of in- 


ertia" — that comes into play whenever the effort is made to 
change the state of motion of an object. 

These extra forces form an important class. They can be 
held responsible for such phenomena as the motion of a Foucault 
pendulum, the effects in a high-speed centrifuge, the so-called 
g forces on an astronaut during launching, and the preferred 
direction of rotation of cyclones in the northern and southern 
hemispheres. These forces are unique, however, in the sense 
that one cannot trace their origins to some other physical system, 
as was possible for all the forces previously considered. Gravita- 
tional, electromagnctic, and contact forces, for example, have 
their origins in other masses, other charges, or the "contact" of 
another object. But the additional forces that make their ap- 
pearance when an object is being accelerated have no such 
physical objects as sources. Are these inertial forces real or not? 
That question, and the answer to it, is bound up with the choice 
of reference frame with respect to which we are analyzing the 
motion. Let us, therefore, begin this analysis with a feminder 
of dynamics from the standpoint of an unaccelerated frame. 


An unaccelerated reference frame belongs to the class of reference 
frames that we have called inertial. We saw, in developing the 
basic ideas of dynamics in Chapter 6, that a unique importance 
and interest attaches to these frames, in which Galileo's law of 
inertia holds. We have seen how, if one such frame has been 
identified, any other frame having an arbitrary constant velocity 
relative to the first is also inertial, and our inferences about the 
forces aeting on an object are the same in both. 

To a good first approximation, as we know, the surface of 
the earth defines an inertial frame. So also, therefore, does any 
system moving at constant speed over the earth. Galileo himself 
was the first person to present a elear recognition of this faet, 
and one aspect of it that he diseussed is useful as a starting point 
for us now. In his Dialogue Concerning the Two World Systems, 
in which he advocated the Copernican view of the solar system 
in preference to the Ptolemaic, Galileo pointed out that a rock, 
dropped from the top of the mast of a ship, always lands just at 
the foot of the mast, whether or not the ship is moving. Galileo 
argued from this that the vertical path of a falling object does 
not compel one to the conclusion that the earth is stationary. 

494 Inertial forces and nonineriial frames 

Fig. 12-1 (a) Para- 
bolic trajectory under 
grauity, as observed 
in the eanh's reference 
frame. The initial 
velocily v o is hori- 
zontal, (b) Same 
motion observed from 
a frame wilh a hori- 
zontal velocity greater 
than vo. (c) Same 
motion observed from 
a frame having bot h 
horizontal and vertical 
velocily components. 

The comparison here is between an object falling from rest relative 
to the earth and another object falling from rest relative to the 
ship. If we considered only an object that starts from rest rela- 
tive to a moving shtp, its path would be vertical in the ship's 
frame and parabolic in the earth's frame. More generally, if we 
considered an object projected with some arbitrary velocity 
relative to the earth, its subsequent path would have diverse 
shapes as viewed from different inertial frames (see Fig. 12-1) 
but all of them would be parabolic, and all of them, when ana- 
lyzed, would show that the falling object had the vertical ac- 
celeration, g, resulting from the one force F„ (= mg) due to 
gravity. Let us now contrast this with what one finds if the 
reference frame itself has an acceleration. 


Suppose that an object is released from rest in a reference frame 
that has a constant horizontal acceleration with respect to the 
earth's surface. Let us consider the subsequent motion as it 
appears with respect to the earth and with respect to the ac- 
celerating frame. We shall take the direction of the positive x 
axis in the direction of the acceleration and will set up two 
rectangular coordinate systems: system S, at rest relative to the 
earth, and S', fixed i n the accelerating frame (Fig. 12-2). Take 

+ v 

Fig. 12-2 Relationship of co- 
ordinales ofa particle in iwo 
frames that are in accel- 
erated relative motion. 



(relative to 5) 



495 Motion observed from an accelerated frame 

the origins of the frames to coincide at t = 0, and suppose that 
the velocity of S' with respect to S at this instant is equal to Vo- 
The vertical axes of the two systems are taken as positive upward, 
and the object is released at t = from a point for which x = 
x' = 0, y = / = h. 

What will the trajectories in S and S' look like? For an 
observer in S, we already know the answer. To him, the object 
is undergoing free fail with initial horizontal velocity v [Fig. 
12-3(a)]. Thus we have 

(As observed i n S) 

{x = vot 
y- h- i** 2 

These two equations uniquely define the position of the object 
at time t, but to describe the motion as observed in S' we must 
express the results i n terms of the coordinates x' and y' as mea- 
sured in S'. To transform to the S' frame, we substitute 

x = x — x, 

y = y 

where x s is the separation along the x axis of the origins of S 
and S' (see Fig. 12-2). We know that 

x, = vot + §at 2 
Substituting these values we find 

.au a- ca K = Vot " ( " ' + % a,2) = ~% a ' 2 
(As observed in S') \ , „ 

W = h - \gi- 

Thus the path of the particlc as observed in S' is a straight line 
given by the equation 

x'= -"{h- y') 

Fig. 12-3 (a) Para- 
bolic trajectory of a 
particle under gravily, 
as observed in the 
earlh's reference 
frame S. (b) Same 
motion observed in a 
frame S' that has a 
constant horizontal 

. . . . : 







Seen in S 

496 Inertial forces and noninertial frames 

This is shown in Fig. 12-3(b). In the accelerated frame, the 
object appears to have not only a constant downward component 
of acceleration due to gravity, but also a constant horizontal 
component of acceleration in the — x direction which causes the 
particle to follow a nonvertical straight-line path. [A similar 
simple example is the monkey-shooting drama described in 
Chapter 3 (p. 104). The outcome becomes almost self-evident if 
we choose to describe the events in the rest frame of the falling 
monkey. In this frame the bullet just follows a straight-line path 
directly toward the monkey, while the ground accelerates up- 
ward at 9.8 m/sec 2 .] 

There is no mystery about the unfamiliar motion repre- 
sented by Fig. 12-3(b). It is a direct kinematic consequence 
of describing the normal free-fall motion from a frame that is 
itself accelerated. We could perfectly well use this path, de- 
scribed by measurements made entirely within S', to discover 
the acceleration of this frame, provided that the direction of the 
true vertical were already known. However, a greater interest 
attaches to learning about the acceleration through dynamic 
methods. That is the concern of the next section. 


From what has bcen said, it is clear that inertial frames have a 
very special status. AU inertial frames are eguivalent in the sense 
that it is impossible by means of dynamical experiments to dis- 
cover their motions in any absolute sense— only their relative 
motions are significant. Out of this dynamical equivalence 
comes what is called the Newtonian principle of relativity: 

There is no dynamical observation that leads us to prefer one 
inertial frame to another. Hence, no dynamical experiment will 
tell us whether we have a constant velocity through space. 

As we have just seen, however, a relative acceleration between 
two frames is dynamically detectable. As observed in accelerating 
frames, objects have unexpected accelerations. It follows at once, 
since Newton's law establishes a link between force and ac- 
celeration, that we have a quantitative basis for calculating the 
magnitude of the inertial force associated with a measured 
acceleration. Conversely, and more importantly, we have a 
dynamical basis for inferring the magnitude of an acceleration 
from the inertial force associated with it. This is the underlying 

497 Accelerated frames and inertial forees 

principle of all the instruments known as accelerometers. They 
function because of the inertial property of some physical mass. 
To makc the analysis explicit, consider the motion of a 
particle P with respect to two reference frames like those con- 
sidered in the last section and shown in Fig. 12-2: an inertial 
frame S and an accelcrated frame S'. We then have, once again, 

x = X 1 + x, 

y = y' 

The velocity components of P as measured in the two frames are 
thus given by 

where v s = dx s /dt at any particular instant. If S' has a constant 
acccleration a, we can put d s = v + at, but the condition of 
constant acceleration is not at all necessary to our analysis. 

Taking the time derivatives of the instantaneous velocity 
components, we then get 

a z = a' x + a, 
Oy = a' y 

where a, is the instantaneous acceleration of the frame S'. 
Although we have chosen to introduce the calculation in terms 
of Cartesian components, it is clear that a single vector statement 
relates the acceleration a of P, as measured in S, to its accelera- 
tion a' as measured in S' together with the acceleration a, of S' 

a = a' 


Multiplying Eq. (12-1) throughout by m, we recognize the left- 
hand side as giving the real (net) foree, F, that is aeting on the 
particle, since this defines the true cause of its acceleration as 
measured in an inertial frame. That is, in the S frame, 

F = «n (12-2) 

but, using Eq. (12-1), this gives us 

F = »ra' + ma, (12-3) 

We now come to the crucial question: How do we interpret 
Eq. (12-3) from the standpoint of observations made within the 

498 Inertial forees and noninertial frames 

accelerated frame S' itself? 

Newton's viewpoint — that the net force on an object is the 
cause of accelerated motion (F nct = ma)- is so deeply ingrained 
in our thinking that we are strongly motivated to preserve this 
relationship at all times. When we observe an object accelerating, 
we interpret this as due to the action of a net force on the object. 
Can we achieve a mathematical format that has the appearance 
°f Fnct = wa f° r tne present case of an accelerated frame of 
reference? Yes. By transferring all terms but ma' to the left 
and treating these terms as forces that act on m, and have a 
resultant F', which is of the correct magnitude to produce just 
the observed acceleration a' : 

F' = F - ma, = ma' (12-4) 

The net force in the S' frame is thus made up of two parts: a 
"real" force, F, with components F x and F y , and a "fictitious" 
force equal to —ma s , which has its origin in the fact that the 
frame of reference itself has the acceleration +a„. An important 
special case of Eq. (12-4) is that in which the "real" force F is 
zero, in which case the particle, as observed in S', moves under 
the action of the inertial force — ma s alone. 

The result expressed by Eq. (12-4) is not mercly a mathe- 
matical trick. From the standpoint of an observer in the ac- 
celerating frame, the inertial force is actually present. If one 
took steps to keep an object "at rest" in S', by tying it down 
with springs, these springs would be observed to elongate or 
contract in such a way as to provide a counteracting force to 
balance the inertial force. To describe such a force as "fictitious" 
is therefore somewhat misleading. One would like to have some 
convenient label that distinguishes inertial forces from forces 
that arise from truc physical interactions, and the term "pseudo- 
force" is oftcn used. Even this, however, does not do justice to 
such forces as experienced by someone who is actually in the 
accelerating frame. Probably the original, strictly technical 
name, "inertial force," which is free of any questionable over- 
tones, remains the best description. 

As an illustration of the way in which the same dynamical 
situation may be described from the different standpoints of an 
inertial frame, on the one hand, and an accelerated frame, on 
the other, consider a simple pendulum suspended from the roof 
of a car. The mass of the bob is m. In applying F = ma from the 
standpoint of a frame of reference S attached to the earth 

499 Accelerated l'rames and inertial forces 

Fig. 12-4 Forces 
acting on a suspended 
mass in (a) a slation- 
ary car, (b) a car 
moving al consianl 
velocity, and (c) a car 
imdergoing a posiliue 

(assumed nonrotating), one can draw isolation diagrams for the 
possible motions of the car as shown in Fig. 12-4. In each case, 
there are just two (real) forces acting on the bob: F„, the foree 
of gravity, and T, the tension in the string. Cases (a) and (b) do 
not involve acceleration and the application of F = ma is trivial. 
In (c), the bob undcrgoes acceleration toward the right and the 
string hangs at an angle with some increase in its tension (from 
rto 7",). The isolation diagram of Fig. 12-5 (a) leads us to apply 
F = ma as follows: 

Horizontal component: 7"i sin0 = ma 

Vertical component : Ty cos 6 — mg = 

In the S' frame, however, because of the acceleration of the 
frame, there will be an additional foree of magnitude ma in the 
direetion opposite to the acceleration of the frame. Figure 
12-5(b) shows an isolation diagram for the bob as seen in S'. 
The bob is in equilibrium. Here, application of F' = ma' gives 
(because a' = 0): 

Fig. 12-5 Forces on 
an object thai is al 
resi relaliue lo an 
acceleraled car (a) as 
judged in an inerlial 
frame, and (b) as 
judged in the acceler- 
aled frame. 

500 Inerlial forces and noninertial frames 

Ti sin S - ma = O 
7"i cos 8 — mg = 

Thus the equilibrium inclination of the pendulum is defined by 
the condition 

tan 9 = - 



Ffe. /2-5 (a) Tie 
hanging in equilib- 
rium within an 
accelerated cehicle. 
(h) Quantitatwe ac- 
celerometer based on 
measuring the eguilib- 
rium angle of a simple 
plumbline. (c) Car- 
penter's level (in Ihis 
case a pivoted marker 
immersed in liquid of 
greater densily) can 
be used as an acceler- 
omeler. (d) A bubble 
irapped in a curved 
tube of liguid gices 
direct readings of 
acceleralion. Tliis 
form of accelerometer 
was deuised by W. V. 
Walton (Edueation 
Research Center, 
M.I.T.). Figure 12-7 
shows an example of 
its use. 

The result expressed by Eq. (12-5) provides the theoretical basis 
for a simple accelerometer. If we have first established the true 
vertical direction, representing e = 0, the observation of the 
angle of inclination of a pendulum at any subsequent time tells 
us the value of a through the equation 

a = g tan d 

For example, if a passenger in an airplane lets his tie, or a key- 
chain, hang freely from his fingers during the takeoff run, he 
can make a rough estimate of the acceleration, which is usually 
almost constant [Fig. 12-6(a)]. If he also records the time from 
the beginning of the run to the instant of takeoff, he can obtain 

501 Accelerometer* 

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 

/, sec 

Fig. 12-7 (a) Record obtaimd with the accelerometer ofFig. 12-6(rf) before 
and afler takeoffofa commercial jet aircraft. The accelerometer was held se- 
as to record the horizontal component of acceleration only. Not e the sharp 
decrease in a at takeoff. (b) Graph ofvelocity versus time, obtained by 
graphical integration of(a). (c) Graph of distance versus time, obtained by 
graphical integration of(b). 

a fairly good estimate of the length of the run and the takeoff 
speed. If he is more ambitious, he can go armed with a card, as 
in Fig. 12-6(b), already marked out as a goniometer (= angle 
measurer) or even directly calibrated in terms of acceleration 
measured in convenient units (e.g., mph per second). ' Another 
simple accelerometer is obtainable readymade in the form of a 
carpenter's level made of a small pivoted float that is completely 
immersed in a liquid [Fig. 12-6(c)]. AH these devices make use 
of the fact that the natural direction of a plumbline in an ac- 
celerated frame is defined by the combination of the gravitational 
acceleration vector g and the negative of the acceleration a of 
the frame itself. 

A quite sensitive accelerometer of this same basic type, with 
the further advantages of a quick response and a quick attain- 
ment of equilibrium (without much overshoot or oscillation) 
can be made by curving a piece of plastic tubing into a circular 
arc and filling it with water or acetone until only a small bubble 
remains [see Fig. 12-6(a)]. Figure 12-7 (a) shows the record of 
acceleration versus time as obtained with such an accelerometer 
during the takeoff of a jet aircraft. Figures 12-7(b) and (c) show 
the results of numerically integrating this record so as to obtain 
the speed and the total distance traveled. 

Accelerometers of a vastly more sophisticated kind can be 
made by using very sensitive strain gauges, with electrical mea- 
suring techniques, to record in minute detail the deformations 
of elastic systems to which a mass is attached. Figure 12-8 
shows in schematic form the design of such an instrument. If 
the object on which the accelerometer is mounted undergoes an 
acceleration, the inertial force experienced by the pendulum bob 
begins to deflect it. This, however, unbalances slightly an elec- 
trical capacitance bridge in which the pendulum forms part of 
two of the capacitors, as shown. An error signal is obtained 
which is used both to provide a measure of the acceleration and 
to drive a coil that applies a restoring force to the pendulum. 
Such an accelerometer unit may have a useful range from about 
10 -5 "g" to more than 10 g. 

'A book entitled Science for the Alrplane Passenger by Elizabeth A. Wood 
(Ballantine, New York, 1969) has such a goniometer on its back cover and a 
discussion of its use in the text. The book also describes a host of other ways 
in which airplane passengers can discover or apply scientific principles during 
their travels. 

503 Accelerometers 



Fig. 12-8 Electro- 
mechanical acceler- 
omeler system. 






In all our discussions of accelerated frames, we have assumed 
that the observers know "which way is up" — i.e., they know the 
direction and magnitude of the force of gravity and treat it 
(as we have done) as a real force, whose source is the gravitating 
mass of the earth. But suppose our frame of reference to be a 
completely enclosed room with no access to the external sur- 
roundings. What can one then deduce about gravity and inertial 
forces through dynamical experiments wholly within the room? 
We shall suppose once again that there is an observer in a 
frame, S, attachcd to the earth. This observer is not isolated; 
he is able to verify that the downward acceleration of a particle 
dropped from rest is along a line perpendicular to the earth's 
surface and hence is directed toward the center of the earth. ' He 
is able to draw the orthodox conclusion that this acceleration is 
due to the gravitational attraction from the Iarge mass of the 
earth. Our second observer is shut up in a room that defines the 
frame S'. Initially it is known that the fioor of his room is 

■We are slill ignoring the rolation of the earth, which causes this statement to 
be not quite correct. A falling object does nol fail exactly parallel to a plumb- 
line. We shall come back to this when we diseuss rotating reference frames. 


Incrlial 101 

•ccs and non inertial frames' 

horizontal and that its walls are vertical. In subsequent mea- 
suremcnts, however, the observer in S' finds that a plumbline 
hangs at an angle to what he had previously taken to be the 
vertical, and that objects dropped from rest travel parallel to 
his plumbline. The observers in S and S' report their findings to 
one another by radio. The observer in S' then concludes that 
he has three alternative ways of accounting for the component 
of force, parallel to the floor, that is now exerted on all particles 
as observed in his frame: 

1 . In addition to the gravitational force, there is an inertial 
force in the — x direction due to the acceleration of his frame in 
the +x direction. 

2. His frame is not accelerating, but a large massive object 
has been set down in the — x direction outside his closed room, 
thus excrting an additional gravitational force on all masses in 
his frame. 

3. His room has been tilted through an angle e and an extra 
mass has been placed beneath the room to increase the net 
gravitational force. (This is close to being just a variant of 
alternative 2.) 

In supposing that all three hypotheses work equally well to 
explain what happens in S', we must assume that the additional 
massive object, postulated in alternatives 2 and 3, produccs an 
effectively uniform gravitational field throughout the room. 

From dynamical experiments made entirely within the closed 
room, there is no way to distinguish among these hypotheses. 
The acceleration of the frame of reference produces effects that 
are identical to those of gravitational attraction. Inertial and 
gravitational forces are both proportional to the mass of the 
object under examination. The procedures for detecting and 
measuring them are identical. Moreover, they are both de- 
scribablc i n tcrms of the properties of a field (an acceleration 
field) that has a certain strength and direction at any given point. 
An object placed in this field experiences a certain force without 
benefit of any contaet with its surroundings. Is all this just an 
interesting parallel, or does it have a deeper significance? 

Einstein, after pondering these questions, concluded that 
there was indecd somcthing fundamental here. In particular, the 
completely exact proportionality (as far as could be determincd) 
between gravitational force and inertial mass suggested to him 
that no physical distinetion could be drawn, at least within a 

505 Accelerating frames and eravity 



Fig. 12-9 (a) Apple falling inside a box t ha I rests on 
Ihe earth. (b) Indistinguishable molion when Ihe apple 
is inside an acceleraled box i n ouler space. 

limited region, between a gravitational field and a general ac- 
celeration of the reference frame (see Fig. 12-9). He announced 
this— his famous principle of equivalence— in 191 1. 1 The propor- 
tionality of gravitational force to inertial mass now becomes an 
exact necessity, not a n empirical and inevitably approximate 
result. It is also implied that anything traversing a gravitational 
field must follow a curved path, because such a curvature would 
appear on purely kinematic and geometrical grounds if we re- 
placed the gravitational field by the equivalent acceleration of our 
own reference frame. I n particular, this should happen with 
rays of light (see Fig. 12-10). With the help of these ideas Einstein 
proceeded to construct his general theory of relativity, which 
(as we pointed out in Chaptcr 8) is primarily a geometrical theory 
of gravitation. 

Fig. 12-10 Successive stages in ihe path of a hori- 
zontally Iraveling object as observed within an enclosure 
acceleraling certically upward. This illustrates ihe 
eauicalence ofgraviiy and a general acceleration of the 
reference frame. 

'A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. (4) 35, 898 (1911), reprinted in translated form in 
The Principle of Relaticiiy (W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffery, translators), Methuen, 
London, 1923 and Dover, New York, 1958. 

506 Inertial forces and noninertial frames 


We shall now consider a particular kind of inertial force that 
always appears if the motion of a particle is described and 
analyzed from the standpoint of a rotating reference frame. This 
force — the centrifugal force — is familiar to us as the force with 
which, for example, an object appears to puli on us if we whirl 
it around at the end of a string. ' To introduce it, we shall consider 
a situation of just this kind. 

Suppose that a "tether ball" is being whirled around in 
horizontal circular motion with constant speed (Fig. 12-11). 
We shall analyze the motion of the ball as seen from two view- 
points: a stationary frame S, and a rotating frame S' that rotates 
with the same (constant) rotational speed as the ball. For con- 
venience, we align the coordinate systems with their z and z' axes 
(as well as origins) coincident. The rotational speed of S' relative 
to S will be designated w (in rad/sec). Figure 12-11 shows the 
analysis with respect to these two frames. The essential con- 
clusions are these: 

1. From the standpoint of the stationary (inertial) frame, 
the ball has an acceleration (— w 2 r) toward the axis of rotation. 
The force, F r , to cause this acceleration is supplied by the tether- 
ing cord, and we must have 

(In S) F, = —mo>-r 

2. From the standpoint of a frame that rotates so as to kcep 
exact pace with the ball, the acceleration of the ball is zero. We 
can maintain the validity of Newton's law in the rotating frame 
if, in addition to the force F r , the ball experiences an inertial 
force Fi, equal and opposite to F r , and so direeted radially 
outward : 

^{«-A + ft-O 

[Fi = m<i> 2 r 

The force Fi is then what we call the centrifugal force. 

The magnitude of the centrifugal force can be cstablishcd 
experimentally by an observer in the rotating frame S'. Let him 
hold a mass m stationary (as secn in his rotating frame) by 

•The name "centrifugal" comes from ihe Latin: cenlrum, the center, and 
fugere, to ffee. 

507 Centrifugal force 


Viewed from stationary frame S 

Viewed from rotating frame i" 



A \^ 

r . 

— a 

— -*— -S 

Pictorial sketch of 

h ' - 



Bali is observed to move with 
speed u in a circle of radius r 
(angular speed u<) 

Boy turns around at the same 
angular speed o> as the ball; 
from his point of view, the ball 
is at rest 

"Isolate fhe body." Draw 
all forces that act on 
the ball 


T \>1 

, nng 

T = tension in cord 
mg = force of gravity 
F, = inertial force due to viewing 
the problem from a rotating 

For ease of calculation 
we resolve forces into 

T sin $ 


T cos e 

r sin 9 

T cos e 

components in 
mutually perpendicu- 
lar directions 

1 1 mg 

Vertical Direction 

Vertical Direction 

We now analyze the 
problem in terms of 
F = ma 

Because there is no vertical ac- 
celeration, we conclude that 
the net vertical force must be 
zero; hence 

T cos - mg 

Because there is no vertical 
acceleration, we conclude that 
the net vertical force must be 
zero; hence; 

T cos n = mg 

Horizontal Direction 

Horizontal Direction 

The object is t' 
therefore acc 
force (i.e.. th 
forces) is hor 
center of the 
be equal in n 

T sin e - 

This force is di 

aveling in a circle. 

elerating: the net 

B sum of all three 
zontal toward the 
circle, and must 

lagnitude to mv*lr; 

rected radially 

The object is "at rest," therefore 
the sum of all the forces on it 
must be zero; hence F, is equal 
in magnitude to T sin A From 
the analysis in the left column. 
it is given by 

,. mv 2 . 
t i = — — = m<u'r 

and is directed outward. 
We call F, the centrifugal force 

Fig. 12-11 Mol ion of a suspended ball, which is traveling in a horizontal 
circle, as analyzed from the earth's reference frame and from a frame rotating 
with the ball. 

508 Inertial forces and noninerlial frames 

Spring balance fastened 
to the axis of rotation, 
which is perpendicular 
to the plane of the paper- 

Fig. 12-12 Measurement of the W \^1>1)00000 t>~- A-. 

force needed to hold an object at 
rest in a rotating reference frame. 

attaching it to a spring balance (Fig. 12-12). If the mass is at 
any location except on the axis of rotation, the spring balance 
will show that it is exerting on the mass an inward force propor- 
tional to m and r. If the observer in S' is informed that his frame 
is rotating at the rate of w rad/sec, he can confirm that this force 
is equal to mwV. The observer explains the extension of the spring 
by saying that it is counteracting the outward centrifugal force 
on m which is present in the rotating frame. Furthermore, if the 
spring breaks, then the net force on the mass is just the centri- 
fugal force and the object will at that instant have an outward 
acceleration of u 2 r in response to this so-called "fictitious" 
force. Once again the inertial force is "there" by every eriterion 
we can apply (except our inability to find another physical system 
as its source). 

The magnitude of the centrifugal force is given, as we have 
seen, by the equation 


Fccntrifugai = m— = mw 2 r (radially outward) (12-6) 

A nice example of our almost intuitive use of this force, under 
conditions in which there is nothing to balance it, is provided 
by situations such as the following: We have been washing a 
piece of straight tubing, and we want to get it dry on the inside. 
As a first step we get rid of the larger drops of water that are 
sitting on the inside walls. And we do this, not by shaking the 
tube longitudinally, but by whirling it in a circular arc [Fig. 
12-13(a)]. The analysis of what happens as we begin this rotation 
gives a particularly elear picture of the difference between the 
deseriptions of the process in stationary and rotating frames. It 
also provides us with a different way of deriving the formula for 
the centrifugal force itself. 

Suppose that a drop, of mass m, is sitting on the inner wali 
of the tube at a point A [Fig. 12-13(b)], a distance r from the 
axis of rotation. Assume that the tube is very smooth, so that 

509 Centrifugal force 

Fig. 12-13 (a) Shak- 
ing a drop ofwater oul 
ofa tube. (A) Analysis 
of initial motion in 
lerms of centrifugal 

the drop encountcrs no resistance if it moves along the tube. 
The drop must, however, be carried along in any transverse 
movement of the tube resulting from the rotation. Then if the 
tube is suddenly set into motion and rotated through a small 
angle A0, the drop, receiving an impulse normal to the wali of 
the tube at A, moves along the straight line AC. This, however, 
means that it is now further from the axis of rotation than if it 
had been fixcd to the tube and had traveled along the circular 
arc AB. We have, in fact, 

BC = r sec A0 - r 


sec AS = (cosA0)-' « [1 - KAfl) 2 ]" 1 
« 1 + KA<0 2 


BC ~ £r(A0) 2 

We can, however, exprcss A0 in terms of the angular velocity w 
and the time Al: A0 = u A/. Thus we have 

BC = iw 2 r(Af) 2 

This is then recognizable as the radial displacement that occurs 
in time Ar under an acceleration u 2 r. Hence we can put 

"ccntrifiiciil — °> r 

and so 

fcentrifuRal = "'W 2 /" 

510 inertial forces and noninertial frames 


Notice, then, that what is, in fact, a small transverse displace- 
ment in a straight line, with no real force in the radial direction, 
appears in the frame of the tube as a small, purely radial dis- 
placement under an unbalanced centrifugal force. The physical 
fact that the drop i s moved outward along the tube is readily 
understood in terms of either description. (We should add, how- 
ever, that our analysis as it stands does only apply to the initial 
step of the motion. Once the drop has acquired an appreciable 
radial velocity, things become more complicated.) 

The term "centrifugal force" is frequently used incorrectly. 
For example, one may read such statements as "The satellite 
does not fail down as it moves around the earth because the 
centrifugal force just counteracts the force of gravity and hence 
there is no net force to make it fail." Any such statement flouts 
Newton's first law — A body with no net force on it travels in a 
straight line. . . . For if the satellite is described as moving in 
a curved path around the earth, it must also have an unbalanced 
force on it. The only frame in which the centrifugal force does 
balance the gravitational force is the frame in which the satellite 
appears not to move at all. One can, of course, consider the 
description of such motions with respect to a reference frame 
rotating at some arbitrary rate different from that of the orbiting 
object itself. In this case, however, the centrifugal contribution 
to the inertial forces represents only a part of the story, and the 
simple balancing of "real" and centrifugal forces does not apply. 
In particular, let us reemphasize that in a nonrotating frame of 
reference there is no such thing as centrifugal force. The long- 
standing confusion that leads people to use the term "centrifugal 
force" incorrectly has driven at least one author to extreme 
vexation. In an otherwise sober and quite formal text the author 
writes: "There is no answer to these people. Some of them are 
good citizens. They vote the ticket of the party that is responsible 
for the prosperity of the country; they belong to the only true 
church; they subscribe to the Red Cross drive — but they have 
no place in the Temple of Science; they profane it." ' 

The laboratory centrifuge represents an immensely important 
and direct application of the dynamical principle of centrifugal 
force. The basic arrangement of a simple type of centrifuge is 

'W. F. Osgood, Mechanics, Macmillan, New York, 1937. 

511 C?cntrifuacs 

Fig. 12-14 (a) Ver- 
lical section through 
a simple centrifuge. 
(b) Analysis of radial 
sedimenlation in 
terms of cenirifugal 

shown in Fig. 12-14(a). Carefully balanced tubes of liquid are 
suspended on smooth pivots from a rotor. When the rotor is 
made to spin at high speed, the tubes swing upward and outward 
into almost horizontal positions and may be maintained in this 
orientation for many hours on end. At any point P in one of the 
tubes [Fig. 12— 14(b)], distance r from the axis of rotation, there 
is an effective gravitational field of magnitude w 2 r, which may 
be made very much greater than g. For example, if r = 15 cm 
and the rotor spins at 25 rps (co = 50* sec -1 ), the value of w 2 r 
is about 4000m/sec 2 or 400 g. Small particles in suspension in 
the liquid will be driven toward the outward (bottom) end of the 
tube much more quickly than they would ever be under the action 
of gravity alone. 

The basis for calculating the drift speed is the formula for 
the resistive force to motion through a fluid at low speeds, which 
we first met in Chapter 5. For a spherical particle of radius r 
and speed v, this force is proportional to the product ro. If the 
medium is water, the approximate magnitude of the force is 
given by 

R(v) « 0.02rv 

where R is in newtons, r in meters, and v in m/sec. A steady 
value of v is attained when this force just balances the driving 
force associated with the effective gravitational field strength, g'. 
In calculating this driving force it is important to allow for 
buoyancy effects — i.e., Archimedes' principle. If the density of 
the particle is p p and the density of the liquid is p ( , the driving 
force is given by 


512 Inertial forces and noninertial (rames 

This can be more simply expressed if we introduce the true 
mass m of the particle (= 4irp p r 3 /3), in which case we can put 

To take a specific example, suppose that we have an aqueous 
suspension of bacterial particles of radius 1 p., each with a mass 
of about 5 X 10 -15 kg and a density about 1.1 times that of 
water. If w6 take for g' the value 400 g calculated earlier, we find 

F« 2 X 10~ 12 N 

We thus obtain a drift speed given by 

2 X 10~ 12 ]n _ 4 , 

^ 2X10-^10-» a '° m/S6C 

This represents a settling rate of several centimeters per hour, 
which makes for effective separation in reasonable times, whereas 
under the normal gravity force alone one would have only a 
millimeter or two per day. 

The above example represents what one may regard as a 
more or less routine type of centrifugation, but in 1925 the 
Swedish chemist T. Svedberg opened up a whole new field of 
research when, by achieving centrifugal fields thousands of times 
stronger than g, he succccded in measuring the molecular weights 
of proteins by studying their radial sedimentation. The type of 
machine he developed for this purpose was appropriately named 
the ultracenlrifuge, and Svedberg succeeded in producing centri- 
fugal fields as high as about 50,000 g. The physicist J. W. Beams 
has taken the technique even further through his development 
of magnetic suspensions, in vacuum, that dispense with me- 
chanical bearings altogether. The rotor simply spins in empty 
space, with carefully controlled magnetic fields to hold it at a 
constant vertical level against the normal puli of gravity. By 
such methods Beams has produced centrifugal fields equivalcnt 
to about 10° g in a usable centrifuge and fields as high as 10 9 # 
in tiny objects (e.g., spheres of 0.001-in. diameter). The limita- 
tion is set by the bursting speed of the rotor; this defines a maxi- 
mum value of u proportional to l/r (see Chapter 7, p. 208). 
Since the centrifugal field g' is equal to u 2 r, and the limiting 
speed sets an upper limit to ur, it may be seen that the attainable 
value of g' varies as l/r. 

The techniquc of ultracentrifuge methods has been brought 

513 Centrifuees 

to an extraordinary pitch of refinement. It has become possible 
to determine molecular weights to a precision of bettcr than 1% 
over a range from about 10 8 (virus particles) down to as low as 
about 50. The possibitity of measuring the very low molecular 
weights by this method is particularly impressive. Beams has 
pointed out that in a solution of sucrose in water, the calculatcd 
rate of descent of an individual sucrose molecule, of mass about 
340 amu and radius about 5 A, would (according to the kind of 
analysis we gave earlier) be less than 1 mm in 100 years under 
normal gravity. (A rate as slow as this becomes in fact mean- 
ingless because, as Beams points out, it would be completely 
swamped by random thermal motions.) If a field of 10 5 g is 
available, howevcr, the time constant of the sedimentation 
process is reduced to the order of 1 day or less, which brings the 
measurement well within the range of possibility. ! 

This whole subject of centrifuges and centrifugation is a 
particularly good application of the concept of inertial force, 
because the phenomena are so appropriately described in terms 
of static or quasistatic equilibrium in the rotating frame. 


We have seen how the centrifugal force, mo> 2 r, exerted on a 
particle of a givcn mass m in a frame rotating at a given angular 
velocity w, depends only on the distance r of the particle from 
the axis of rotation. In general, however, another inertial force 
appears in a rotating frame. This is the Coriolis force, 2 and it 
depends only on the velocity of the particle (not on its position). 
We shall introduce this force in a simple way for some specific 
situations. Later, by introducing vector expressions for rotational 
motion, we shall develop a succinct notation that gives both the 
centrifugal and Coriolis forces in a form valid in three dimensions 
using any type of coordinate system. 

The need to introduce the Coriolis force is easily shown by 
comparing the straight-line motion of a particle in an inertial 
frame S with the motion of the same particle as seen in a rotating 
frame S'. 

■For further reading on this extremely interesting subject, see T. Svedberg 

and K. O. Pedersen, The Ulrracentrifuge, Oxford University Press, New York, 

1960, and J. W. Beams, "High Centrifugal Fields," Physics Teacher 1, 103 


2 G. Coriolis, J. de VEcole Polytechnique, Cahier 24, 142 (1835). 

514 Inertial forces and nonincrtial irames 

Suppose that S' is a coordinate system attached to a hori- 
zontal circular table that rotates with constant angular speed w. 
Let the vertical axis of rotation define the z' axis and suppose 
that the table surface (in the x'y' plane) has no frietion. A string 
fastened to the origin holds a partiele on the y' coordinate axis 
at a radial distance r' a from the axis of rotation. Thus, in the S' 
frame, the partiele is at rest in equilibrium under the combined 
forees of the tension in the string and the centrifugal foree. (The 
vertical foree of gravity and the normal foree of the table surface 
always add to zero and need not concern us further.) 

The same partiele is viewed from an inertial frame S which 
coincides with S' at f = 0. In this stationary frame, the partiele 
travels with uniform speed ve = ov" in a cirele of constant 
radius r (= r' ) under the single unbalanced foree of the tension 
in the string. There is, of course, no centrifugal foree in this 
inertial frame. 

At / = the string breaks. In S the partiele then travels 

Fig. 12-15 Two different deseriptions of the molion of 
an object that is initially tethered on a rotating disk and 
begins molion under no forees at t = 0. 

0, the string breaks. The dots 
indicate the positions of the partiele 
at successive equal time intervals 

0, 1, 2, 3 At the same time instants 

the rotating y' axis has the positions 
shownby(O), (1), (2), (3),.... 

As seen in the rotating S' frame 

The partiele is initially at rest. After the 
string breaks, it begins to move radially 
outward, but as soon as it acquires some 
speed, it veers toward the right of the 
y' axis. 

515 Coriolis forees 

in a straight line with constant speed v = u>r Q as shown in Fig. 
12-15(a). To find the motion in S', we compare in the stationary 
frame the positions of the y' axis and the corresponding locations 
of the particle at successive equally-spaced times. We discover 
that the particle, as observed in S', not only moves radially 
outward, but also moves farther and farther to the right of the 
single radial line formed by the rotating / axis. This result is 
plotted in Fig. 12— 15(b). To explain this motion as observed 
in the rotating frame, it is necessary to postulate, in addition to 
the centrifugal force, a sideways deflecting force. This deflecting 
force is the Coriolis force. In the course of the following dis- 
cussion, we shall determine its magnitude and show that it 
always acts at right anglcs to any velocity v' in the S' frame. 

We can find the magnitude of the Coriolis force by in- 
vestigating another simple motion in these two frames. Suppose 
that, instead of the situation just described, we make a particle 
follow a radially outward path in the rotating frame at constant 
velocity v' r . In this frame there must be no net force on the 
particle. Hence we shall have to supply some real (inward) force 
to counteraet the varying (outward) centrifugal force as the 
particle moves. We shall not concern ourselves with these radial 
components but will concentrate our attention only on the 
transverse-foree components. In this way we can remove from 
consideration the distortion of the trajectory by the centrifugal 
force, which is purely radial. 

How does the motion appear in the two frames? Figure 
12— I6(b) shows the straight-line path of the object in the rotating 
frame. But the path of the object in the stationary frame is a 
curved line AB as shown in Fig. 12-16(a). In S the transverse 
velocity vg (= ur) is greater at B than at A, because the radial 
distance from the axis is greater at B. Hence there must be a 
real transverse force to produce this increase of velocity seen in 
the stationary frame. This real force might be provided, for 
example, by a spring balance. 

What does this motion look like in the rotating frame? In 
S' the object moves outward with constant speed and hence has 
no acceleration [see Fig. 12-16(b)]. This means, as we have 
said, that there can be no net force on the object in the rotating 
frame. But since an observer in S' sees the spring balance exert- 
ing a real sideways force on the object in the +6 direetion, he 
infers that there is a counteraeting inertial force in the — diree- 
tion to balance it. This is the Coriolis force. 

516 Inertial forees and noninertial frames 

Fig. 12-16 (a) Lab- 
oratory view of the 
path of a particle that 
moves radially out- 
ward on a rotaling 
table. (b) The motion 
as it appears in the 
rotaling frame itself. 


As seen in the stationary 
s frame 

The mass point foilows the 
curved path frorrr A to 8. 

As seen in the rotating 
S' frame 

The mass point moves radially 
outward with constant speed. 

co(r + 8r) 

To determine its magnitude, let O A and OB in Fig. 12-17 
be successive positions of the same radial line at times separated 
by A/. Let OC be the bisector of the angle A0. The velocity 
perpendicular to OC changes by the amount Avg during At, where 

Av e = [co(r + Ar) cos(A0/2) + v T sin(A0/2)] 

- [tar cos(A0/2) - v, sin(A0/2)] 

For small angles we can put the cosine equal to 1 and the sine 
equal to the angle, which leads to the following very simple 
expression for Ao$ : 

Avb a» coAr + v r A6 
The transverse acceleration ao is thus given by 

a 6 = ai(Ar/Al) + u r (A0/Al) 

Ar/Al = c r and A6/At = o> 


at = 2uv, 
Ft = 2mwo r 

Fig. 12-17 Basis of calculaling the Coriolis force for 
a particle mocing radially at constant speed with re- 
spect to a rotating tahle. 

517 Coriolis forces 

This gives us the real force needed to cause the real acceleration 
as judged in S. But as observed in the rotating frame S', there 
is no acceleration and no net force. Hence the existence of the 
Coriolis force, equal to — 2mcov' T , is inferred. (Note that v T — Vr.) 
This inertial force is i n the negative B' direction, opposite to the 
spring force, and is at right angles to the direction of motion 
of the particle : 

Fs'(Coriolis) = -2mwo' r (12-7) 

An important feature, which you should verify for yourself, 
is that if we had considered a radially inward motion (v' r negative), 
then we would have inferred the existence of a Coriolis force 
acting in the positive B' direction. In both cases, therefore, the 
Coriolis force acts to deflect the object in the same way with 
respect to the direction of the velocity v' itself— to the right if 
the frame S' is rotating counterclockwise, as we have assumed, 
or to the left if S' rotates clockwise. It turns out, in fact, as we 
shall prove later, that even in the case of motion in an arbitrary 
direction the Coriolis force is always a deflecting force, exerted 
at right angles to the direction of motion as observed in the 
rotating frame. 

The Coriolis force is very real from the viewpoint of the 
rotating frame of reference. If you want toconvince yourself of 
the reality of this "fictitious" force, ride a rotating merry-go- 
round and try walking a radial line outward or inward. (Proceed 
cautiously — the Coriolis force is so unexpected and surprising 
that it is easy to lose one's balance!) 


As we have just mentioned, the behavior of objects in motion 
within a rotating reference frame can run strongly counter to 
one's intuitions. It is not too hard to get used to the existence 
of the centrifugal force acting on an object at rest with respect 
to the rotating frame, but the combination of centrifugal and 
Coriolis effects that appear when the object is set in motion can 
be quitc bewildering, and somctimes entertaining. Suppose, for 
example, that a man stands at point A on & merry-go-round 
[Fig. 12-18(a)] and tries to throw a ball to someone at B (or 
perhaps aims for the bull's-eye of a dart board placed there). 
Then the thrown object mystcriously veers to the right and 
misses its target every time. One can blame part of this, of course, 
on the centrifugal force itself. Howevcr, it is to be noted that 

518 Inertial forccs and nonincrlial framcs 

Fig. 12-18 (a) Tra- 
jectories ofobjects as 
lliey appear to ob- 
servers on a rotating 
lable. (b) An object 
projected on afriction- 
less rotating table can 
return to its starting 

since the magnitude of the centrifugal force is mu 2 r and that of 
the Coriolis force is 2mwv', the ratio of these two forces is pro- 
portional to v'fur. Thus if v' is made much greater than the actual 
peripheral speed of the merry-go-round, the peculiarities of the 
motion are governed almost entirely by the Coriolis effects. If 
this condition holds, the net deflection of a moving object will 
always be to the right with respect to v' on a merry-go-round 
rotating counterclockwise. Thus if the positions A and B in 
Fig. 12-18(a) are occupied by two people trying to throw a ball 
back and forth, each will have to aim to the left in order to make 
a good throw. 

An extrcme case of this kind of behavior can cause an 
object to follow a continuously curved path that brings it back 
to its starting point, although it is not subjected to any real 
forces at all. This phcnomenon has been demonstrated in the 
highly entertaining and instructive film, Frames of Reference. 1 
A dry-ice puck, launched at point A on a tabletop of plate glass 
[Fig. 12-18(b)], can be caused by a skilled operator to follow a 
trajectory of the kind indicated. 


The goal of this discussion will be to relate the time derivatives 
of the displacement of a moving object as observed in a sta- 

'" Frames of Reference," by J. N. P. Humc and D. G. Ivey, Education Develop- 
ment Center, Newton, Mass., 1960. 

2 This section may be omitted by a reader who is willing to take on trust its 
final results — that the total inertial force in a rotating frame is the combination 
of the centrifugal force with a Coriolis force corresponding to a generalized 
formof Eq. (12-7). 

519 General equation of motion in a rotating frame 

Fig. 12-19 Use of 
angular velocity as a 
vector to define the 
linear velocity ofa 
parlicle on a roiating 
lable: v = to X r. 

tionary frame S' and in a rotating frame 5'. To set the stage, we 
shall introduce the idca that angular velocity may be represented 
as a vector. 

Consider first a point P on a rotating disk [Fig. 12-19(a)]. 
It has a purely tangential velocity, v$, in a direction at right 
angles to the radius OP. We can describe this velocity, in both 
magnitude and direction, if we define a vector according to the 
same convention that we introduced for torque in Chapter 4. 
That is, if the fingcrs of the right hand are curled around in the 
sense of rotation, keeping the thumb extended as shown in 
the figure, then w is represented as a vector, of length propor- 
tional to the angular speed, in the direction in which the thumb 
points. Thus with to pointing along the positive z direction, one 
is defining a rotation that carries each point such as P from the 
positive x direction toward the positive y direction. The rotation 
of the disk is in this case counterclockwise as seen from above. 

The velocity of P is now given by the vector (cross) produet 
of to with the radius vector r: 

v = to X r 


This veetor-produet exprcssion is valid in three dimensions also, 
if the position vector r of P is measured from any point on the 
axis of rotation, as shown in Fig. 12-19(b). The radius of the 
cirele in which P moves is R = r sin e. Thus we have v = vg = 
cor sin 6, in a direction perpendicular to the plane defined by to 
and r. That is precisely what Eq. (12-8) gives us. 

Next, we consider how the change of any vector during a 

520 Inertial forees and nonincrtial frames 

Fig. 12-20 (a) Change 
of a vector, analyzed 
in terms ofits change 
as measured on a 
rotaling lable, to- 
gel/ier with the change I 
due lo rolalion of the 
lable iiself. (6) Sim- 
ilar analysisfor an 
arbitrary veclor 
referred to any origin 
on the axis ofrotation. 

small time interval At can be exprcssed as the vector sum of two 

1. The change that would occur if it were simply a vector 
of constant length embedded in the rotating frame S'. 

2. The further change described by its change of length and 
direction as observed in S'. 

In Fig. 12-20(a) we show this analysis for motion confined 
to a plane. The vector A at time / is represented by the line CD. 
If it remains fixed with respect to a rotating table, its direction 
at time t + At is given by the line CE, where A8 = w At. Thus 
its change due to the rotation alone would be represented by 
DE, where DE = A Ad = Au At. From the standpoint of 
frame S' this change would not be observed. There might, how- 
ever, be a change represented by the line EF; we shall denote 
this as AA S — the change of A as observed in S'. The vector 
sum of DE and EF, i. e., the line DF, then represents the true 
change of A as observed in 5. We therefore denote this as AX S . 

In Fig. 12-20(b) we show the corresponding analysis for 
three dimensions. The length of DE is now equal to A sin 6 Aip; 
its direction is perpendicular to the plane defined by w and A. 
Since A<p = u At, we can put 

vector displacement DE = (u X A) A/ 

The displacement A A s- may be in any direction with respect to 
DE, but the two again combine to give a net displacement DF 
which is to be identified with A As. Thus we have 

521 General eqnalion of motion in a rotating frame 

AA S = AA S ' + (w X A)Af 

We can at once proceed from this to a relation between the ratcs 
of change of A as observed in S and S', respectively: 

\drjs \ di J s- 

+ « X A (12-9) 

This is a very powerful relation because A can be any vector 
we please. 

First, we shall choose A to be the position vector r. Then 
(d\/dt)s is the true velocity, v, as observed in S, and (dA/dt)g> is 
the apparent velocity, v', as observed in S'. Thus we immediately 

v = v' + « X r (12-10) 

Next, we shall choose A to be the velocity v: 

Now (dv/dt)s is the true acceleration, a, as observed in S. The 
quantity (d\/dt) s - is, however, a sort of hybrid — it is the rate of 
change in S' of the velocity as observed in S. We can make more 
sense of this if we substitute for v from Eq. (12-10); we then have 

®, -(& + •*$„ 

The two terms on the right of this equation are now quite recog- 
nizable; (d\'/dl)s- is the acceleration, a', as observed in S', and 
(dr/dt)s> is just v'. Thus we have 

(£), = •*- 

X v' 

Substituting this in Eq. (12-11) we thus get 

a = a'+«Xv' + «Xv 

We do not need to have both v and v' on the right-hand side, 
and we shall again substitute for v from Eq. (12-10). This gives 
us finally 

a = a' + 2u X v' + u X (w X r) (12-12) 

A remark is in order regarding the last term, which involves 

522 Inerlial fbrees and noninertial Frames 

the cross product of three vectors. According to the rules of 
vector algebra, the cross product inside the parentheses is to be 
taken first, then the other cross product performed. A nonzero 
answer will result for all cases where the angle formed by u and r 
is other than 0° or 180°. Performing the cross products in the 
reverse (incorrect) order, however, would result in zero for all 
cases, regardless of the angle between these vectors. 

Multiplying Eq. (12-12) throughout by the mass m of the 
object, we recognize the left side as the net external force on 
the mass as seen in the stationary system. 

ma = F nct = m»' + 2m(w X v') + m[u X (<o X r)] 

In the rotating frame of reference, the object m has the accelera- 
tion a'. We may preserve the format of Newton's second law in 
this accelerated frame of reference by rearranging the above 
equation, so as to be able to write 

Fi* = roa' 




= F net - 2m(« X v') - m[u X (to X r)] 

"real" Coriolis centrifugal 






The mathematical form of Eq. (12-13b) shows that both the 
Coriolis force and the centrifugal force are in a direction at 
right angles to the axis of rotation defined by u. The centrifugal 
force, in particular, is always radially outward from the axis, as 
is clear if one considers the geometrical relationships of the 
vectors involved in the product — u X (w X r), as shown in 
Fig. 12-21. The equation also shows that the Coriolis force 


Fig. 12-21 Relalion of the vectors in- 
volved informing the centrifugal accelera- 
tion — c» X (w X r). 


-» x (u x r) 

523 General equation of motion in a rotating frame 

would reverse if thc direction of u were reversed, but the direction 
of the centrifugal force would remain unchanged. 

The specification of F' in Eq. (12-13) can be made entirely 
on the basis of measurements of position, velocity, and accelera- 
tion as observed within the rotating fratne itself. The centrifugal 
term, involving the vector r, might seem to contradict this, but 
we could just as well put r' instead of r, because observers in 
the two frames do agree on the vector position of a moving object 
at a given instant, granted that they use the same choice of origin. 

To summarize, we have established by the above calculation 
that the dynamics of motion as observed in a uniformly rotating 
frame of reference may be analyzed in terms of the following 
three categories of forces: 

"Real": F nnt 

-2m(oi X v') 

This is the sum of all the "real" forces on 
the object such as forces of contaet, tensions 
in strings, the force of gravity, electrical 
forces, magnetic forces, and so on. Only 
these forces are seen in a stationary frame of 

The Coriolis force is a deflecting force always 
at right angles to the velocity v' of the mass 
m. If the object has no velocity in the 
rotating frame of reference, there is no 
Coriolis force. It is an inertial force nol seen 
in a stationary frame of reference. Note 
minus sign. 

The centrifugal force depends on position 

only and is always radially outward. It is an 

< inertial force not seen in a stationary frame 

I of reference. We could equally well write it 

(as — m[o> X (<•> X r')]. Note the minus sign. 


In this seetion we shall consider a few examples of the way in 
which the earth's rotation affects the dynamical processes oc- 
curring on it. 

The local value of g 

If a partiele P is at rest at latitude X near the earth's surface, 
then as judged in the earth's frame it is subjected to the gravita- 

524 Inertial forces and noninertial frames 

Fig. 12-22 (a) Forces on an objecl at rest Ott the earth, 
as interpreted in a reference frame that roiates wilh l/ie 
eart/i. (b) An objecl falling from rest relalive to Ihe 
earth undergoes an eastward displacement. (c) The fall- 
ing motion of (b), as seen from a frame thal does nol 
roiale wilh ihe earth. 

tional force F„ and the centrifugal force F ccnt shown in Fig. 
12-22(a). The magnitude of the latter is given, according to 
Eq. (12-13b), by the equation 

^cent = rnu> 2 R sin 9 = mu R cosX 

where R is the earth's radius. We have already discussed in 
Chapter 8 the way in which this centrifugal term reduces the 
local magnitude of g and also modifies the Iocal direction of the 
vertical as dcfined by a plumbline. The analysis is in fact much 
simpler and clearer from the standpoint of our natural reference 
frame as defined by the earth itself. We have, as Fig. 12-22(a) 
shows, the following relations: 

F a — moi Rcos X 

Fr = F, - Fccnt COS X 

F$ = Fcnt sin X = mu R sin X cos X 
Deviation offreelyfalling objects 


If a particle is releascd from rest at a point such as P in Fig. 
12-22(a), it begins to accelerate downward under the action of a 
net force F' whose components are given by Eq. (12-14). As 

525 The earth as a rotating reference frame 

soon as it has any appreciable velocity, however, it also expe- 
riences a Coriolis force given by the equation 

Fcorioiu = -2mn X v' (12-15) 

Now the velocity v' is i n the plane PON containing the earth's 
axis. The Coriolis force must be perpendicular to this plane, and 
a consideration of the actual directions of u and v' shows that 
it is eastward. Thus if we set up a local coordinate system defined 
by the local plumbline vertical and the local easterly direction, 
as in Fig. 12-22(b), the falling object deviates eastward from a 
plumbline AB and hits the ground at a point C. The effect is 
very small but has been detected and measured in careful ex- 
periments (see Problem 12-24). 

To calculate what the deflection should be for an object 
falling from a given height h, we use the fact that the value of v' 
to be inserted in Eq. (12-15) is extremely well approximated by 
the simple equation of free vertical fail : 

v' = gt 

where v' is measured as positive downward. Thus if we label the 
eastward direction as x', we have 

m— r-r- = (2mu> cos X)gt 

Integrating this twice with respect to t, we have 

x' = $gwt a cos X (12-16) 

For a total distance of vertical fail equal to h, we have t = 
(2h/g) U2 , which thus gives us 

X ,_2V|«C<|X A 3,2 (121?) 

Inserting approximate numcrical values (w = 2xday -1 ~7X 
10 -5 sec -1 ), one finds 

x' ~ 2 X 10- 5 A 3/2 cos X (x' and h in m) 

Thus, for example, with h = 50 m at latitude 45°, one has 
x" « 5 mm, or about ? in. 

It is perhaps worth reminding oneself that the effects of 
inertial forces can always be calculated, if one wishes, from the 

526 Inertial forces and noninertial frames 

standpoint of an inertial frame in which these forces simply do 
not exist. In the present case, one can begin by recognizing that 
a particle held at a distance h above the ground has a higher 
eastward velocity than a point on the ground below. For sim- 
plicity, let us consider how this operates at the equator (X = 0). 
Figure I2-22(c) shows the trajectory of the falling object as 
seen in a nonrotating frame. The object has an initial horizontal 
velocity given by 

DO, = o>(R + h) 

After a time t it has traveled a horizontal distance x given, very 
nearly, by coRt. With the object now at P (see the figure) the 
gravitational force acting on it has a very small component in 
the negative x direction. We have, in fact, 

F x *» — jf ( « —mgmt 


Integrating once, we have 

dx , 2 

■j t ~ "o*- is°» 

Substituting the value v Qx = w(R + h), this gives, as a very 
good approximation, 

d f t = co(« + /o - iga 2 

Integrating a second time, we have 

x - «(* + h)i - \gut 3 

However, the point O at the earth's surface is also moving, with 
a constant speed of coR. Thus, when the falling object hits the 
ground at C, the point O has reached O', where 00' = uRl. 
Hence we have 

x' = O'C w oj/>/ - i*cor 3 

If we substitute h = \gt 2 , we at once obtain the result given by 

527 The cari h as a rotating reference frame 

Fig. J 2-23 Format ion ofa cyclone In the 
northern hemisphere, under the aclion of 
Coriolis forces on the moving air masses. 


Eq. (12-16) for X = 0. [Or, of course, we can substitute t = 
V2h/g and arrive at Eq. (12-17)]. 

Patterns of atmospheric circulation 

Because of the Coriolis effect, air masses being driven radially 
inward toward a low-pressure region, or outward away from a 
high-pressure region, are also subject to deflecting forces. This 
causes most cyclones to be in a counterclockwise direction in the 
northern hemisphere and clockwise in the southern hemisphere. 
The origin of these preferred rotational directions may be seen 
in Fig. 12-23, which shows the motions of air in the northern 
hemisphere moving toward a region of low pressure. The hori- 
zontal components of the Coriolis force deflect these motions 

Fig. 12-24 Tiros satellite photo- 
graph of a cyclone. (Courtesy of 
Charles W. C. Rogers and N.A.S.A.) 


BJty.\~ -— 31 I 

^fl ^^^-*" 







RJ— «.'— 



V' - 


528 Inertial forces and noninerlial frames 

toward the right. Thus, as the air masses converge on the center 
of the low-pressure region, they produce a net counterclockwise 
rotation. For air moving north or south over the earth's surface 
the Coriolis force is due east or due west, parallel to the earth's 
surface. If we consider a 1-kg mass of air at a wind velocity of 
10 m/sec (about 22 mph) at 45° north latitude, a direct applica- 
tion of Eq. (12-15) gives us 

, Fcorioii, - 2mui/ sin X « (2)(1)(2tt X lO" 5 ) 

X (10)(0.707) w 10" 3 N 

If we had considered air flowing in from east or west, the Coriolis 
forces would not be parallel to the earth's surface, but their 
components parallel to the surface would be given by the same 
equation as that used above. (Verify this.) 

The approximate radius of curvature of the resultant motion 
may be obtained from 





R = m — ^ « 1 X -r^r-r. = 10' 5 m (about 60 miles) 

rCorioli. 10 •» 

As air masses move over hundreds of miles on the earth's sur- 
face, they often form huge vortices — as is dramatically shown 
in the Tiros weather satellite photograph in Fig. 12-24. 

Occasionally one reads that water draining out of a basin 
also circulates in a preferred direction because of the Coriolis 
force. In most cases, the Coriolis force on the flowing water is 
negligible compared with other larger forces which are present; 
however, if extremely precise and careful expcriments are per- 
formed, the effect cari be demonstrated. 1 

The Foucault pendulum 

No account of Coriolis forces would be complete without some 
mention of the famous pendulum experiment named after the 
French physicist J. B. L. Foucault, who first demonstrated in 
1851 how the slow rotation of the plane of vibration of a pen- 

'See, for example, the film "Balhtub Vortex," an exccrpt from "Vorticity," 
by A. H. Shapiro, National Council on Fluid Mechanics, 1962. 

529 The earth as a rotating reference frame 

Fig. 12-25 (a) A 
pendulum swinging 
along a north-south 
line at lalilude X. 
(b) Palh of pendulum 
bob, as seenfrom 
above. (The change 
ofdireclion per swing 
is, however, grossly 

dulum could be used as evidence of the earth's own rotation. 

It is easy, but rather too glib, to say that of course we are 
simply seeing the effect of the earth turning beneath the pendulum. 
This description might properly be used for a pendulum sus- 
pended at the north or south pole. One can even press things a 
little further and say that at a given latitude, X [see Fig. 12-25(a)] 
the earth's angular velocity vector has a component w sin X along 
the local vertical. This would indeed lead to the correct result— 
that the plane of the pendulum rotates at a rate corresponding 
to one complete rotation in a time 7"(X) given by 

HX) = 



24 esc X hours 


But the pendulum is, after all, connected to the earth via its 
suspending wire, and both the tension in the wire and the gravita- 
tional force on the bob lie in the vertical plane in which the 
pendulum is first set swinging. (So, too, is the air resistance, if 
this needs to be considered.) It is the Coriolis force that can be 
invoked to give a more cxplicit basis for the rotation. For a 
pendulum swinging in the northern hemisphere, the Coriolis 
force acts always to curve the path of the swinging bob to the 
right, as indicatcd in exaggerated form in Fig. 12-25(b). As 
with the Coriolis force on moving air, the effect does not depend 
on the direction of swing— contrary to the intuition most of us 
probably have that the rotation is likely to be more marked 
when the pendulum swings along a north-south line than whcn 
it swings east-west. 

530 Inertial forces and noninertial frames 


Fig. 12-26 (a) Double 
tidal bulge as it 
would be if the earlh's 
rotation did not dis- 
place it. The size of 
the bulge is enor- 
mously exaggerated. 
(b) Approximate true 
orientation ofthe 
tidal bulges, carried 
eastwardby the earth's 

As everyone knows, the production of ocean tides is basically 
the consequence of the gravitational action of the moon — and, 
to a lesser extent, the sun. Thus we could have discussed this as 
an example of universal gravitation in Chapter 8. The analysis 
of the phenomenon is, however, considerably helped by intro- 
ducing the concept of inertial forces as developed in the present 

The feature that probably causes the most puzzlement when 
one first learns about the tides is the fact that there are, at most 
places on the earth's surface, two high tides every day rather 
than just one. This corresponds to the fact that, at any instant, 
the general distribution of ocean levels around the earth has two 
bulges. On the simple model that we shall discuss, these bulges 
would be highest at the places on the earth's surface nearest to 
and farthest from the moon [Fig. 12-26(a)]. While the earth 
performs its rotation during 24 hr, the positions of the bulges 
would remain almost stationary, being defined by the almost 
constant position of the moon. Thus, if one could imagine the 
earth completely girdled by water, the depth of the water as 
measured from a point fixed to the earth's solid surface would 
pass through two maxima and two minima in each revolution. 
A better approximation to the observed facts is obtained by con- 
sidering the bulges to be dragged eastward by friction from the 
land and the ocean floor, so that their equilibrium positions with 
respect to the moon are more nearly as indicated in Fig. 12-26(b). 

To conclude these preliminary remarks, we may point out 
that the bulges are, in fact, also being carried slowly eastward 
all the time by the moon's own motion around the earth. This 
motion (one complete orbit relative to the fixed stars every 

531 The tides 

27.3 days) has the consequence that it takes more than 24 hr for 
a given point on the earth to make successive passages past a 
particular tidal bulge. Specifically, this causes the theoretical 
time interval between successive high tides at a given place to be 
close to 12 hr 25 min instead of precisely 12 hr (see Problem 2-15). 
For example, if a high tide is observed to occur at 4 p.m. one 
day, its counterpart next day would be expected to occur at about 
4:50 p.m. 

Now let us consider the dynamical situation. The first 
point to appreciate is the manner in which the earth as a whole 
is being accelerated toward the moon by virtue of the gravita- 
tional attraction between them. With respect to the CM of the 
earth-moon system (inside the earth, at about 3000 miles from 
the earth's center), the earth's center of mass has an acceleration 
of magnitude a c given by Newton's laws: 

MrOc = 


r m 2 


ac = 

GM m 


where M m and r„, are the moon's mass and distance. What may 
not be immediately apparent is that every point in the earth 
receives this same acceleration from the moon's attraction. If 

Flg. 12-27 The or- 
bital motion ofthe 
earth about the moon 
does not by itselfin- 
volce any rotation of 
the earth; the line 
AiBi is carried into 
the parallel configura- 
tion A2B2. 

532 Inertial forces and noninertial frames 

one draws a sketch, as shown in Fig. 12-27, of the arcs along 
which the earth's center and the moon travel in a certain span 
of time, one is tempted to think of the earth-moon system as a 
kind of rigid dumbbell that rotates as a unit about the center of 
mass, O. It is true that the moon, for its part, does move so that 
it presents always the same face toward the earth, but with the 
earth itself things are different. If the earth were not rotating on 
its axis, every point on it would follow a circular arc identical in 
size and direction to the arc C X C 2 traced out by the earth's 
center. The line AiBy would be translated into the parallel line 
A 2 B 2 . The earth's intrinsic rotation about its axis is simply 
superposed on this general displacement and the associated 

This is where noninertial frames come into the picture. 
The dynamical consequences of the earth's orbital motion around 
the CM of the earth-moon system can be correctly described in 
terms of an inertial force, —mac, experienced by a particle of 
mass m wherever it may be, in or on the earth. This force is 
then added to all the other forces that may be acting on the 

In the model that we are using — corresponding to what is 
called the equilibrium theory of the tides — the water around the 
earth simply moves until it attains an equilibrium configuration 
that remains stationary from the viewpoint of an observer on 
the moon. Now we know that for a particle at the earth's center, 
the centrifugal force and the moon's gravitational attraction are 
equal and opposite. If, however, we consider a particle on the 
earth's surface at the nearest point to the moon [point A in 
Fig. 12-28(a)], the gravitational force on it is greater than the 
centrifugal force by an amount that we shall call/ : 

Fig. 12-28 (a) Dif- 
ference belween cen- 
trifugal force and the 
earth's gravity at the 
points nearest to and 
farthest from the 
moon. (b) Tide- 
producing force at an 
arbitrary point P, 
showing existence of a 
transverse component. 

533 The tides 

GM m m _ GM m m 

Since R E « r m (R E « r m /60), we can approximate this expres- 
sion as follows: 

/o = 

GM m m 


/„«H™^*, (12 _ 20) 

By an exactly similar calculation, we find that the tide-producing 
force on a particle of mass m at the farthest point from the moon 
[point B in Fig. 12-28(a)] is equal to —f ; hence we recognize 
the tendency for the water to be pulled or pushed away from a 
midplane drawn through the earth's center (see the figure). 

By going just a little further we can get a much better in- 
sight into the problem. Consider now a particle of water at an 
arbitrary point P [Fig. 12-28(b)]. Relative to the earth's center, 
C, it has coordinates (x, y), with x = R E cos 6, y = R E sin 6. 
The tidal force on it in the x direction is given by a calculation 
just like those above: 

m IGM^n x _ IGM^n ^ cqs g (]2 _ 21) 

This yiclds the results already obtained for the points A and B 
if we put d = or ir. In addition to this force parallel to the 
line joining the centers of the earth and the moon there is also, 
however, a transverse force, because the line from P to the moon's 
center makes a small angle, a, with the x axis, and the net gravita- 
tional force, GM m m/r' 2 , has a small component perpendicular to 
x, given by 

GM m m . , ... , 

/„ = j— sin a (with r = r*) 

Now we have 


tana = 

Since a is a very small angle [<tan ■ (/?/.;//•„,), which is about 1°] 
wc can safely approximate the above exprcssion: 

534 Inertial forces and noninerlial frames 

Fig. 12-29 Pattern 
of tide-producing 
forces around the 
earlh. The circular 
dashed line shows 
where the undisturbed 
waler surface would 

y_ _ R E sin d 
r m r- 

The component/„ of the tidal force is then given by 

GM m m GM m m 
f v » 5— y = 5— Re sin 


We see that this transverse force is greatest at d = ir/2, at which 
point it is equal to half the maximum value (/ ) of f x . Using 
Eqs. (12-21) and (12-22) together, we can develop an over-all 
picture of the tide-producing forces, as shown in Fig. 12-29. 
This shows much more convincingly how the forces act in such 
directions as to cause the water to flow and redistribute itself in 
the manner already qualitatively described. 


How high ought the equilibrium tidal bulge to be? If you are 
familiar with actual tidal variations you may be surprised at the 

'This section goes well beyond the scope of the chapter as a whole but is 
added for the interest that it may have. 

535 Tidal heights; eflect of the sial 

result. The equilibrium tide would be a rise and fail of less than 
2 ft. We can calculate this by considering that the work done 
by the tidal force in moving a particle of water from D to A 
(Fig. 12-29) is equivalent to the increase of gravitational po- 
tential energy needed to raise the water through a height h 
against the earth's normal gravitational puli. ' The distance h is 
the difference of water levels between A and D. Now, using 
Eqs. (12-21) and (12-22) we have 

dW = f z dx + f„dy 

GM m m ,_ , . 

= ir~ (2xdx - ydy) 


r r R E r° 

GM m m 
Wda = 

2x dx — / ydy 

r m 3 U o Jr b 

3GM m m 2 

Setting this amount of work equal to the gain of gravitational 
potential energy, mgh, we have 

_ 3GM m R B 2 (12 _ 23) 

2gr m a 

The numerical values of the relevant quantities are as follows: 

G = 6.67 X 10~ n m 3 /kg-sec 2 

M m = 7.34 X 10 22 kg 

r m = 3.84 X 10 8 m 

R E = 6.37 X 10° m 

g = 9.80 m/sec 2 

Substituting these in Eq. (12-23) we find 

A « 0.54 m « 21 in. 

The great excess over this calculated value in many places (by 
factors of 10 or even more) can only be explained by considering 
the problem in detailed dynamical terms, in which the accumula- 
tion of water in narrow estuaries, and resonance effects, can 
completely alter the scale of the phenomenon. The value that 
we have calculated should bc approximated in the open sea. 

The last point that we shall consider here is the effect of the 
sun. Its mass and distance are as follows: 

■Technically, this condition corrcsponds to the water surface being an energy 

536 Incrlial forces and noninertial irames 

M, = 1.99 X 10 30 kg 
r„ = 1.49X10" m 

If we directly compare the gravitational forces exerted by the 
sun and the moon on a particle on the earth, we discover that the 
sun wins by a large factor: 

F, MJr? M.(r m \\ 

F„ M m /r m 2~ Mm \r.) ° 

What matters, however, for tide production is the amount by 
which these forces change from point to point over the earth. 
This is expressed in terms of the gradient of the gravitational 
force: • 

m = 2p 

/=AF=-^Ar (,2-24) 

Putting M = M m , r = r m , and Ar = ±R E , we obtain the forces 
±/ corresponding to Eq. (12-20). 

We now see that the comparative tide-producing forces due 
to the sun and the moon are given, according to Eq. (12-24), by 
the following ratio: 

Substituting the numerical values, one finds 
fy « 0.465 


This means that the tide-raising ability of the moon exceeds that 
of the sun by a factor of about 2.15. The effects of the two 
combine linearly— and, of course, vectorially, depending on the 
relative angular positions of the moon and the sun. When they 
are on the same line through the earth (whether on the same side 
or on opposite sides) there should be a maximum tide equal to 
1.465 times that due to the moon alone. This should happen 
once every 2 weeks, approximately, when the moon is new or 
full. At intermediate times (half-moon) when the angular posi- 
tions of sun and moon are separated by 90°, the tidal amplitude 
should fail to a minimum value equal to 0.535 times that of the 
moon. The ratio of maximum to minimum values is thus 
about 2.7. 

537 Tidal heights; efl'cct of the sun 


The phenomena that we have discussed in this chapter seem to 
leave us in no doubt that the acceleration of one's frame of 
reference can be dctected by dynamical means. They suggest 
that a very special status does indeed attach to inertial frames. 
But how can we be sure that we have identified a true inertial 
frame in which Galileo's law of inertia holds exactly? 

We saw at the very beginning of our discussion of dynamics 
that the earth itself represents a good approximation to such a 
frame for many purposes, especially for dynamical phenomena 
whose scale in distance and time is small. But we have now seen 
* abundant evidence that a laboratory on the earth's surface is 
accelerated. If the laboratory is at latitude X (see Fig. 12-30), 
each point in it is accelerating toward the earth's axis of rotation 
with an acceleration given by 

a\ = oi 2 R cos X 


01 = 27r/86,400sec- 1 
R = 6.4 X 10 6 m 

This gives 

a\ = 3.4 X 10- 2 cosXm/sec 2 

This acceleration of a frame of reference tied to the earth is, 
as we know, not the simplest case of an accelerated frame. The 
linearly accelerated frames with which we began this chapter are 
much more readily analyzed. It was, however, the phenomena 
associated with rotating frames that led Newton to his belief in 
absolute space and in the absolute character of accelerations. 
Near the beginning of the Principia he describes a celebrated 

Fig. 12-30 Acceleration toward ihe earth's 
axis by virtue ofits rotation. 

538 Inertial Corces and noninertiai frames 

Bucket rotating 
water stationary 

Bucket and 

water rotating 


Bucket stationary 
water rotating 

Fig. 12-31 Main features ofllie experiment that 
Newton guolecl as evidence oflhe absolute character of 
rotation and the associated acceleration. 

experiment that he made with a bucket of water. It is ari experi- 
ment that anyone may readily repeat for himself. The bucket is 
hung on a strongly twisted rope and is then released. There are 
three key observations, depicted in Fig. 12-31: 

1. At first the bucket spins rapidly, but the water remain's 
almost at rest, before the viscous forces have had time to set it 
rotating. The water surface is flat, just as it was before the bucket 
was released. 

2. The water and the bucket are rotating together; the 
water surface has become concave (see Problem 12-18). 

3. The bucket is suddenly stopped, but the body of water 
continues to rotate, and its surface remains curved. ' 

Clearly, said Newton, the relative motion of the bucket and 
the water is not the factor that determines the curvature of the 
water surface. It must be the absolute rotation of the water in 
space, and its attendant acceleration, that is at the bottom of 
the phenomenon. And with the help of F = ma, we can account 
for it quantitatively. 

Newton's argument is a powerful one. He could point to 
further evidence in support of his views in the bulging of the 
earth itself by virtue of its rotation. The equatorial diameter 
of the earth is greater than the polar diameter by about 1 part 
in 300. It seems almost obvious, even without detailed calcula- 
tion, that this is closely tied to the fact that a^/g is about g£t5 at 
the equator and is zero at the poles (although the detailed cal- 
culation is, in fact, a bit messy). 

Newton did not stop here, of course, He held the key of 
universal gravitation. Even a nonrotating earth would not be 
an inertial frame, because the whole earth is accelerating toward 
the sun. 

For this system we have 

a> = 2ir/(3.l6 X lO^sec- 1 
R = 1.49 X 10 n m 
a 2 = o) 2 /? = 5.9 X 10- 3 m/sec 2 

Newton does not suggest that he actually performed this third step, but it 
represents a natural completion of the experiment as one might perform it 
for oneself. 

539 The search for a fundamental inertial frame 

If we could conceive of an object that was immune to the gravita- 
tional attraction of the sun, it would not obey the law of inertia 
as observed from a reference frame attached to the earth. From 
Newton's standpoint the acceleration is real and absolute and is 
linked to the existence of a well-defined gravitational force pro- 
vided by the sun. 

That was about the end of the road as far as Newton was 
concerned. For him the system of the stars provided the arena in 
which the motions that he so brilliantly analyzed took place. 
A reference frame attached to these fixed stars could be taken to 
constitute a true inertial system, even though it might not coin- 
cide with the absolute space in which he believed. 

Today, thanks to the work of astronomers, we know a good 
deal about the motions of some of those "fixed" stars. We have 
come to be aware of our involvement in a general rotation of our 
Galaxy. The sun would appear to be making a complete circuit 
of the Galaxy in about 2.5 X 10 8 years at a radial distance of 
about 2.5 X 10 4 light-years from the center. For this motion 
we would have 

co~ 2tt/(8 X 10 15 )sec-' 
«« 2.4 X 10 20 m 
a 3 « 10- 10 m/sec 2 

It looks as though this acceleration can be reasonably accounted 
for by means of Newton's law of universal gravitation, if we 
regard the solar system as having a centripetal acceleration under 
the attraction of all the stars lying within its orbit. But no 
dynamical experiments that we do on earth require us to take 
into account this extremely minute effect — or, even, for most 
purposes, the revolution of the earth about the sun. (The rotation 
of the earth on its own axis is, however, an important con- 
sideration — and indeed an important aid in such matters as 
gyroscopic navigation.) Figure 12-32 schematizes the three 
rotating frames in which we find ourselves (we ignore here the 
acceleration caused by the moon). 

But we still have not found an unaccelerated object to which 
we can attach our inertial frame of reference. In fact, we could 
extend this tantalizing search even further. There is some evi- 
dence that galaxies themselves tend to cluster together in groups 
containing a few galaxies to perhaps thousands. Our local group 
consists of about 10 galaxies. Although individual galaxies 
could have rather complex motions with respect to each other, 

540 Inertial force* and non inertial frames 

Fig. 12-32 Accelera- | 
tions ofany laboratory 
reference frame at- 
tached to the earth's 

this group is believed to have a more or less common motion 
through space. 

So where are the "fixed" stars or other astronomical objects 
to which we can attach our inertial frame of reference? It ap- 
pears that referring to the "fued stars" is not a solution and 
contains an uncomfortable element of metaphysics (although we 
frequently usc this phrasc as a shorthand designation for the 
establishment of an inertial frame). This does not mean that 
the astronomical search for an inertial frame has been without 
value. For, at lcast up to the galactic level, it would seem that 
apparent departures from the law of inertia can be traced to 
identifiable accelerations of the reference frame in which motions 
are observed. However, the quest is incomplete, and so it seems 
likely to remain. Ultimatcly, therefore, we rely on an operational 

541 Tho search for a fundamental inertial frame 

definition based upon local dynamical experiments and observa- 
tion. We define an inertial frame to be one in which, experi- 
mentally, Galileo's law of inertia holds. The very existence of the 
inertial property remains, however, a deep and fascinating prob- 
lem, and we shall end the chapter with a few remarks about this 
most fundamental feature of dynamics. 


Not everyone accepted Newton's view that the phenomena 
associated with rotating objects demonstrated the absolute 
character of acceleration. The philosopher-bishop, George 
Berkeley, was perhaps the first person to argue 1 that all motions, 
including rotational ones, only have meaning as motions relative 
to other objects. The circling of two spheres around their center 
of mass could not, he said, be imagined in a space that was 
otherwise empty. Only when we introduce the background 
represented by the stars do we have a basis for recognizing the 
existence of such motion. 

About 150 years later (in 1872) the German philosopher 
Ernst Mach presented the same idea in much more cogent form. 
He wrote: 

For mc, only relative motions exist . . . and I can see, in this 
regard, no distinction between rotation and translation. Ob- 
viously it does not matter if we think of the earth as turning 
round on its axis, or at rest while the fixed stars revolve around 
it . . . But if we think of the earth at rest and the fixed stars 
revolving around it, there is no flattening of the earth, no 
Foucault's experiment and so on— at least according to our 
usual conception of the law of inertia. Now one can solve the 
difflculty in two ways. Either all motion is absolute, or our law 
of inertia is wrongly expressed ... I prefer the second way. 
The law of inertia must be so conceived that exactly the same 
thing results from the second supposition as from the first. By 
this it will be evident that in its expression, regard must be paid 
to the masses of the universe. 2 

■In his iraet De Moiu, written in 1717, 30 years after the publication of 
Newton's Principia. 

2 E. Mach, Hislory and Rool of the Principle of the Consercation of Energy, 
(2nd ed.), Barth, Leipzig (1909). English translation of the 2nd edition by 
P. Jourdain, Open Court Publishing Co., London, 1911. Actually the first 
sentence of the quolation is taken from Mach's classic book, The Science of 
Mechanics, first published in 1883. 

542 Inertial forees and nonincrtial frames 

Thus was born the profound and novel idea — subsequently to 
become famous as Mach's principle — that the inertial property 
of any given object depends upon the presence and the distribu- 
tion of other masses. Einstein himself accepted this idea and 
took it as a central principle of cosmology. 

If one admits the validity of this point of view, then one 
sees that the whole basis of dynamics is involved. For consider 
the method that we described in Chapter 9 (p. 319) for finding 
the ratio of the inertial masses of two objects. This ratio is given 
as the negative inverse ratio of the accelerations that they produce 
by their mutual interaction: 

/Ml _ (22 

W2 O i 

This looks very simple and straightforward, but it is clear that 
our ability to attach specific values to the individual accelera- 
tions, as distinct from the total relative acceleration, depends 
completely on our having identified a reference frame in which 
these accelerations can be measured. For this purpose the 
physical background provided by other objects is essential. 

In looking critically at the phenomena of rotational motion, 
Mach attacked some intuitive notions that are much more deep- 
seated than any that we have in connection with straight-line 
motion. He considered the evidence provided by Newton's 
rotating-bucket experiment which we discussed in the last section. 
It is quite clear that the curvature of the water surface is related 
overwhelmingly to the cxistence of rotation relative to the vast 
amount of distant matter of the universe. When that relative 
rotation is stopped, the water surface becomes fiat. When the 
bucket rotates and the water remains still (both relative to the 
fixed stars), the shape of the water surface remains unaffected. 
But, said Mach, that may bc only a matter of degree. "No one," 
he wrote, "is competent to say how the experiment would turn 
out if the sides of the vessel increased in thickness and mass 
until they were ultimately several leagues thick." His own belief 
was that this rotation of a monster bucket would in fact generate 
the equivalent of centrifugal forces on the water insidc it, even 
though this water had no rotational motion in the accepted sense. 

This is a startling idea indced. Let us prcsent it in a slightly 
dirTerent context. We know that the act of giving an object an 
acceleration a, with respcct to the inertial frame defined by the 
fixed stars, calls into play an inertial force, equal to — /wa, that 
expresses the resistance of the object to being accelerated. In 

543 Spcculations on the origin of inertia 

Mach's view we are equally entitled (indeed, compelled) to 
accept a description of the phenomenon in a frame always 
attached to the object itself. In this frame the rest of the universe 
has the acceleration a' (= —a) and the inertial force ma' that 
the object experiences must be ascribable to the acceleration of 
the other masses. 

This then brings us to the quantitative question: If a mass 
M, at distance r, is given the acceleration a relative to a given 
object, what contribution does it make to the total inertial force 
ma that the object experiences? Since we know that the force is 
proportional to m, we can argue on the grounds of symmetry 
and relativity that it must be proportional to M also. But at 
this point we entcr a more speculative realm. A very suggestive 
analogy is provided by electromagnetic interactions. If two 
electric charges, q t and q it are separated by a distance r, we 
know that the static force exerted by q x on q 2 is given by 

_ fr?l<?2 

where k is a constant that depends on the particular choice of 
units. If, however, the charge q x is given the acceleration a there 
is an additional force that comes into play, directly proportional 
to a and inversely proportional to the distance: 

, kq x q 2 a 

ri2 = 5 — 

c 2 r 

where c is the speed of light. Since this force falls off more slowly 
with distance than the static interaction, it can survive in ap- 
preciable magnitude at distances at which the static l/r 2 force 
has become negligible. This is, in fact, the basis of the electro- 
magnetic radiation field by which signals can be transmitted 
over large distances. 

Suppose now that we assume an analogous situation for 
gravitational interactions. The basic static law of force is known 
to be 


The force on m associated with an acceleration of M would then 
be given by 

, GMma n . ,,., 

Fl2 = ~&T ( } 

544 Inertial forces and noninerlial framcs 

On this basis we can estimate the relative magnitudes of the 
contributions from various masses of interest — the earth, the 
sun, our own Galaxy, and the rest of the universe. Ali we have 
to do is to calculate the values of M/r for these objects. The 
results are shown in Table 12-1, using numbers to the nearest 
power of 10 only. (The value of M for the universe as a whole 
is the somewhat speculative value quoted in Chapter 1.) We 


Source M, kg r, m M/ 'r, kg/m M/r (relative) 


10 25 

10 7 

10 18 

10- 8 


10 3O 

10 11 

10 19 

io- 7 

Our Galaxy 

10* l 


10 20 



] 52 

10 2G 

10 2e 


see that, according to this theory, the effect of a nearby object, 
even one as massive as the earth itself, would be negligible com- 
pared to the effect of the universe at large. 

The total inertial force called into existence if everything in 
the universe acquires an acceleration a with respect to a given 
object would be obtained by summing the forces F' l2 of Eq. 
(12-26) over all masses other than m itself: 

_ ^GM 

«"inertial = ma £_, — — 


This, however, should be identical with what we know to be the 
magnitude of the inertial force as directly given by the value of 
ma. Thus the theory would require the following identity to hold: 

Ef-1 02-27) 

universe u ' 

It is clear from Table 12-1 that even such a large local mass as 
our Galaxy represents only a minor contribution ; what we are 
invoived with is a summation over the approximately uniform 
distribution of matter represented by the universe as a whole. 
If we regard it as a sphere, centered on ourselves, of mean density 
p and radius R v (« 10 10 light-years = 10 26 m), we would have 

univerao ' «'O » 

545 Speculations on the oriain of inertia 


The total mass is however given by 

Mu = — pRu 

Thus we have, on this simple picture (based on Euclidean 

E M 3 Mu ,-20 1 / 
— = - — « 10 kg/m 

universe ** 

Using the values G m 10 -10 N-m 2 /kg 2 and c 2 m 10 17 m 2 /sec 2 , 
we would then have 

E^-io- 1 

f — c&r 

universe " 

Taking into account the uncertainties in our knowledge of the 
distribution of matter throughout space, many would say that 
the factor of about 10 that separates the above empirical value 
from the theoretical value (unity) called for by Eq. (12-27) is 
not significant. The result is intriguing, to say the least, and many 
cosmologists have accepted as fundamentally correct this develop- 
ment from the primary ideas espoused by Mach and Einstein. ' 

12-1 A single-engine airplane flies horizontally at a constant speed v. 
In the frame of the aircraft, each tip of the propeller sweeps out a 
circle of radius R at the rate of n revolutions per second. Obtain an 
equation for the path of a tip of the propeller as viewed from the earth. 

12-2 A person observes the position of a post from the origin of a 
reference frame (S') rigidly attached to the rim of a merry-go-round, 
as shown in the figure. The merry-go-round (of radius R) is rotating 
with angular velocity u, the distance of the post from the axis of the 
merry-go-round is D, and at / = 0, the coordinates of P in 5' are 
x' = D - R,y' = (equivalently, r' = D - R, d' = 0). 

(a) Find the coordinates r'(i), 6'(t) of the post; also give the 
corresponding *'(/) and y'(t). 

•For further reading on this fascinating topic, see, for example, R. H. Dicke, 
"The Many Faces of Mach," in Gracitation and Relalicily (ed. H.-Y. Chin 
and W. F. Hoffmann, eds.), W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1964; N. R. Hanson, 
"Newton's First Law," and P. Morrison, "The Physics of the Large," both 
in Beyond the Edge of Cenainly (R. G. Colodny, ed.), Prentice-Hall, Engle- 
wood Cliffs, N.J., 1965; D. W. Sciama, The Unity ofihe Unicerse, Doubleday, 
New York, 1961, and The Physical Foundaiions of General Relalicily, 
Doubleday, New York, 1969. 

546 Inertial forccs and noninertial frames 

(b) By differentiating the results of (a), obtain the velocity and 
acceleration of the post in both Cartesian and polar coordinates. 

(c) Make a plot of the path of the post in S'. 

12-3 A boy is riding on a railroad flatcar, on level ground, that has 
an acceleration a in the direction of its motion. At what angle with 
the vertical should he toss a ball so that he can catch it without shift- 
ing his position on the car? 

12-4 A railroad train traveling on a straight track at a speed of 
20 m/sec begins to slow down uniformly as it enters a station and comes 
to a stop in 100 m. A suitcase of mass 10 kg having a coefficient of 
sliding friction n = 0.15 with the train's floor slides down the aisle 
diiring this deccleration period. 

(a) What is the acceleration of the suitcase (with respect to the 
ground) during this time? 

(b) What is the velocity of the suitcase just as the train comes 

(c) The suitcase continues sliding for a period after the train 
has stopped. When it comes to rest, how far is it displaced from its 
original position on the floor of the train? 

12-5 A man weighs himself on a spring balance calibrated in newtons 
which indicates his weight as mg = 700 N. What will he read if he 
repeats the observation while riding an elevator from the first to the 
twelfth floors in the following manner? 

(a) Belween the first and third floors the elevator accelerates at 
the rate of 2 m/sec 2 . 

(b) Between the third and tenth floors the elevator travels with 
the constant velocity of 7 m/sec. 

(c) Between the tenth and twelfth floors the elevator decelerates 
at the rate of 2 m/sec 2 . 

(d) He then makes a similar trip down again. 

(e) If on another trip the balance reads 500 N, what can you 
say of his motion? Which way is he moving? 

12-6 If the cocHicient of friction between a box and the bed of a 
truck is /x, what is the maximum acceleration with which the truck can 

547 Problems 

climb a hill, making an angle 6 with the horizontal, without the box's 
slipping on the truck bed ? 

12-7 A block of mass 2 kg rests on a frictionless platform. It is 
attached to a horizontal spring of spring constant 8 N/m, as shown 
in the figure. Initially the whole system is stationary, but at t = the 
platform begins to move to the right with a constant acceleration of 
2 m/sec. 2 As a result the block begins to oscillate horizontally relative 
to the platform. 


8 N/m 




2 m/sec 2 

(a) What is the amplitude of the oscillation? 

(b) At t = 2v/3 sec, by what amount is the spring longer than 
it was in its initial unstretched condition? 

12-8 A plane surface inclined 37° (sin -1 f) from the horizontal is 
accelerated horizontally to the left (see the figure). The magnitude of 
the acceleration is gradually increased until a block of mass m, orig- 
inally at rest with respect to the plane, just starts to slip up the plane. 
The static friction force at the block-plane surface is characterized by 

(a) Draw a diagram showing the forces acting on the block, 
just before it slips, in an inertial frame fbced to the floor. 

(b) Find the acceleration at which the block begins to slip. 

(c) Repeat part (a) in the noninertial frame moving along with 
the block. 

12-9 A nervous passenger in an airplane at takeoff removes his tie 
and lets it hang loosely from his fingers. He observes that during the 
takeoff run, which lasts 30 sec, the tie makes an angle of 15° with 
the vertical. What is the speed of the plane at takeoff, and how much 
runway is needed ? Assume that the runway is level. 

12-10 A uniform steel rod (density = 7500 kg/m 3 , ultimate tensile 
strength 5 X 10 8 N/m 2 ) of length 1 m is accelerated along the direc- 
tion of its length by a constant force applied to one end and directed 
away from the center of mass of the rod. What is the maximum 
allowable acceleration if the rod is not to break? If this acceleration 
is exceeded, where will the rod break? 

12-11 (a) A train slowed with deceleration a. What angle would the 
liquid level of a bowl of soup in the dining car have made with the 
horizontal ? A child dropped an apple from a height h and a distance d 
from the front wali of the dining car. What path did the apple take as 
observed by the child ? Under what conditions would the apple have 
hit the ground? The front wali ? 

548 Tncrtial forces and noninertial frames 




(b) As a reward for making the above observations, the parents 
bought the child a helium-filled balloon at the next stop. For fun, 
they asked him what would happen to the balloon if the train left the 
station with acceleration a'. Subsequently, they were surprised to 
find his predictions corrcct. What did the precocious child answer? 

12-12 An elevator has a downward acceleration equal to g/3. Inside 
the elevator is mounted a pulley, of negligible friction and inertia, 
over which passes a string carrying two objects, of masses m and 3»i, 
respectively (see the figure). 

(a) Calculate the acceleration of the object of mass 3m relatice 
to the elevator. 

(b) Calculate the force exerted on the pulley by the rod that 
joins it to the roof of the elevator. 

(c) How could an observer, completely isolated inside the 
elevator, explain the acceleration of m in terms of forces that he him- 
self could measure with the help of a spring balance? 

12-13 In each of the following cases, find the equilibrium position as 
well as the period of small oscillations of a pendulum of length L: 

(1) In a train moving with acceleration a on level tracks. 

(2) In a train free-wheeling on tracks making an angle 6 with the 

(3) In an elevator falling with acceleration a. 

12-14 The world record for the 16-lb hammer throw is about 70 m. 
Assuming that the hammer is whirled around in a circle of radius 
about 2 m before being let fly, estimate the magnitude of the puli 
that the thrower must be able to withstand. 

12-15 (a) A man rides in an elevator with vertical acceleration a. 
He swings a bucket of water in a vertical circle of radius R. With 
what angular velocity must he swing the bucket so that no water spills? 
(b) With what angular frequency must the bucket be swung if 
the man is on a train with horizontal acceleration a? (The plane of 
the circle is again vertical and contains the direetion of the train's 

12-16 Consider a thin rod of material of density p rotating with con- 
stant angular velocity a> about an axis perpendicular to its length. 

(a) Show that i f the rod is to have a constant stress 5 (tensile 
force per unit area of cross seetion) along its length, the cross-sectional 
area must deercase exponentialIy with the square of the distance 
from the axis: 

— frr a 2 

A = Aue where k = po>~/2S 

[Consider a small segment of the rod between r and r -f Ar, having a 
mass im = pA(r) Ar, and notice that the differcnce in tensions at its 
ends is AT = A(SA).] 

549 Problem s 

(b) What is ihe maximum angular velocity o) max in terms of p, 
5 m ax, and A:? 

(c) The ultimate tcnsilc strength of steel is about 10 9 N/m 2 . 
Estimate the maximum possible number of rpm of a steel rotor for 
which the "taper constant" k = 100 m~ 2 (p = 7500 kg/m 3 ). 

12-17 A spherically shaped influenza virus particle, of mass 6 X 
10 -16 g and diameter 10 -5 cm, is in a water suspension in an ultra- 
centrifuge. It is 4 cm from the vertical axis of rotation, and the speed 
of rotation is 10 3 rps. The density of the virus particle is 1.1 times that 
of water. 

(a) From the standpoint of a rcference frame rotating with the 
centrifuge, what is the effective value of 'V ? 

(b) Again from the standpoint of the rotating reference frame, 
what is the net centrifugal force acting on the virus particle? 

(c) Because of this centrifugal force, the particle moves radially 
outward at a small speed o. The motion is resisted by a viscous force 
given by F rcs = Jnrr\vd, where d is the diameter of the particle and t\ is 
the viscosity of water, equal to 10~- cgs units (g/cm/sec). What is cl 

(d) Describe the situation from the standpoint of an inertial 
frame attached to the laboratory. 

[In (b) and (c), account must be taken of buoyancy effects. Think 
of the ordinary hydrostatics problem of a body completely immersed 
in a fluid of different density.] 

12-18 (a) Show that the equilibrium form of the surface of a rotating 
body of liquid is parabolic (or, strictly, a paraboloid of revolution). 
This problem is most simply considered from the standpoint of the 
rotating frame, given that a liquid cannot withstand forees tangential 
to its surface and will tend toward a configuration in which such forees 
disappear. It is instructive to consider the situation from the stand- 
point of an inertial frame also. 

(b) It has been proposed that a parabolic mirror for an astro- 
nomical teleseope might be formed from a rotating pool of mercury. 
What rate of rotation (rpm) would make a mirror of focal length 20 m? 

12-19 To a first approximation, an object released anywhere within 
an orbiting spacecraft will remain in the same place relative to the 
spacecraft. More accurately, however, it experiences a net force 
proportional to its distance from the center of mass of the spacecraft. 
This force, as measured in the noninertial frame of the craft, arises 
from the small variations in both the gravitational force and the 
centrifugal force due to the change of distance from the earth's center. 
Obtain an expression for this force as a funetion of the mass, m, of the 
object, its distance AR from the center of the spacecraft, the radius R 
of the spacecraft's orbit around the earth, and the gravitational ac- 
celeration gR at the distance R from the earth's center. 

550 Inertial forees and noninertial frames 

12-20 A circular platform of radius 5 m rotates with an angular 
velocity w = 0.2 rad/sec. A man of mass 100 kg walks with constant 
velocity v' = 1 m/sec along a diameter of the platform. At time 
t = he crosses the center and at time t = 5 sec he jumps off the edge 
of the platform. 

(a) Draw a graph of the centrifugal force felt by the man as a 
function of time in the interval / = to t = 5 sec. 

(b) Draw a similar graph of the Coriolis force. For both 
diagrams, give the correct vertical scale (in newtons). 

(c) Show on a sketch the direction of these forces, assuming 
the platform to rotate in a clockwise direction as seen from above. 

12-21 On a long-playing record (33 rpm, 12 in.) an insect starts to 
crawl toward the rim. Assume that the coefficient of friction between 
its legs and the record is 0.1. Does it reach the edge by crawling or 
otherwise ? 

12-22 A child sits on the ground near a rotating merry-go-round. 
With respect to a reference frame attached to the earth the child has 
no acceleration (accept this as being approximately true) and ex- 
periences no force. With respect to polar coordinates fixed to the 
merry-go-round, with origin at its center: 

(a) What is the motion of the child? 

(b) What is his acceleration? 

(c) Account for this acceleration, as measured in the rotating 
frame, in terms of the centrifugal and Coriolis forces judged to be 
acting on the child. 

12-23 The text (p. 516) derives the Coriolis force in the transverse (8) 
direction by considering the motion of an object along a radial line 
in the rotating frame. Correspondingly, if one considers an object 
that is moving transversely in the rotating frame, one can obtain the 
net radial force due to Coriolis and centrifugal effects. Consider a 
particle on a frictionless turntable rotating with angular velocity w. 
The particle is initially at rest relative to the turntable, at a distance r 
from the axis of rotation. 

(a) Set up a fixed coordinate system S with axes x transversely 
and y radially and with its origin O at the position of the particle at 
t = (see the figure). Set up another coordinate system S', with 
origin O' and axes x' and y', which rotates with the turntable and 
which coincides with S at / = 0. Show that at a later time / the co- 
ordinates of a given point as measured in S' and S are related by the 
following equations, where 8 = wt: 

x' = x cos 8 + y sin 8 + r sin 8 

y' = y cos 8 — x sin 8 — r(l — cos 8) 

(b) Suppose that, at / = 0, the particle is given a velocity v' 
551 Problcms 

relative to O' in the x' direction. Its subsequent motion will be along 
the x direction at the constant velocity o' — tar relative to O. Use 
this to obtain its coordinates x' and / at a later time /. 

(c) Making the approximations for the case wt « 1, show that 
for small values of t one can put y' ~ %a' r i 2 , where a' T = co 2 r — Tmvf , 
This corresponds to the required combination of centrifugal and 
Coriolis accelerations. 

(d) If you are feeling ambitious, apply the same kind of analysis 
for an initial velocity in an arbitrary direction. 

12-24 In an article entitled "Do Objects fail South?" [Phys. Rev., 
16, 246 (1903)], Edwin Hall reported the results of nearly 1000 trials 
in which he allowed an object to fail through a vertical distance of 
23 m at Cambridge, Mass. (lat. 42° N). He found, on the average, an 
eastward deflection of 0.149 cm and a southerly deflection of 0.0045 cm. 

(a) Comparc the easterly deflection with what would be ex- 
pected from Eq. (12-17). 

(b) Consider the fact that the development of an eastward 
component of motion relative to the earth would indeed lead in turn 
to a southerly component of Coriolis force. Without attempting any 
detailed analysis, estimate the order of magnitudc of the ratio of the 
resulting southerly deflection to the predominant easterly deflection. 
Do you think that an explanation of HalPs results on southerly de- 
flection can be achieved in these terms? 

12-25 Calculate the Coriolis acceleration of a satellite in a circular 
polar orbit as observed by someone on the rotating earth. Obtain the 
direction of this acceleration throughout the orbit, thereby explaining 
why the satellite always passes through the poles even though it is 
subjected to the Coriolis force. Is there a similar force on a satellite 
in an equatorial orbit? 

12-26 Imagine that a frictionless horizontal table, circular in shape 
and of radius R, is fitted with a perfectly elastic rim, and that a dry-ice 

552 Inertial forces and nonincrtial frames 

puck is launchcd from a point on the rim toward the center. The 
puck bounccs back and forth across the table at constant speed v, but 
because of the Coriolis force it does not quite follow a straight-line 
path along a diameter. Consider the rate at which the path of the 
puck gradually turns with respect to the table, and compare the result 
with that for a Foucault pendulum at the same latitude, X. 

12-27 In the text (p. 536) the height of the equilibrium tide is cal- 
culated by considering the work done by the tide-producing force in 
carrying a particle of water from point D to point A (see the figure). 

By considering the work from D to an intermediate point P, one can 
obtain a general expression for the elevation or depression h{6) of the 
water at an arbitrary point, relative to what the water level would be 
in the absence of the tide-producing force. The calculation involves 
two parts, as follows: 

(a) Evaluate the work integral of the tide-producing force from 
D(x = 0, y = Re) to P(x = Re cos 0, y = Re sin d) for a particle of 
water of mass m. Equating this to the difference of gravitational 
potential energies, mg(iip — ho), one gets an expression for the dif- 
ference hp — ho- 

(b) The total volume of water is a constant. Hence, if ho 
represents the water depth in the absence of the tide-producing force, 
we must havc 


r/ 2 

2TR K -[h(6) - ho]sinddd = 

Putting the results of (a) and (b) together, you should be able to 
verify that the deviation of the water level from its undisturbed state 
is proportional to 3 cos 2 — 1 . 

553 Problem s 

What makes planet s go around the sun ? At the time of 
Kepler some people answered this problem by saying that 
there were angels behind them beating their wings and 
pushing the planet s around an orbit. As you will see, the 
answer is not very far front the truth. The only difference 
is that the angels sit in a different direction and their wings 
push inwards. 

R. P. feynman, The Character of Physical Law (1965) 

Motion under 
central forces 

we have already seen, especially in Chapter 8, how the motion 
of objects under the action of forces directed toward some well- 
defined center is one of the richest areas of study in mechanics. 
Twice in the history of physics the analysis of such motions has 
been linked with fundamental advances in our understanding of 
nature — through the explanation of planetary motions, on the 
macroscopic scale, and through Rutherford's studies of alpha- 
particle scattering, which gave man his first clear view of the 
subatomic world. Up until this point we have limited ourselves 
to the study of circular orbits, and it is remarkable how much 
can be learned on that basis. But now we shall begin a more 
general analysis of motion under the action of central forces. 


As we saw in Chapter 1 1 (p. 444), a central force field that is also 
conservative must be spherically symmetric, and some of the most 
important fields in nature (notably electrical and gravitational) 
are precisely of this type. The frequent occurrence of spherically 
symmetric models to describe physical reality is closely linked to 
the basic assumption that space is isotropic and is the intuitively 
natural starting point in building theoretical models of various 
kinds of dynamical systems. 

We shall begin with the specific problem of the motion of a 
single particle of mass w in a spherically symmetric central field 


Fig. 13-1 (a) Unit 
veciors associated 
with radial and trans- 
verse directions in a 
plane polar coordinale 
system. (b) Radial 
and transverse com- 
ponents ofan ele- 
mentary vector 
displacement Ar. 

of force. Initially, at least, we shall assume that the object re- 
sponsible for this central ficld is so massive that it can be regarded 
as a fixed center that defines a convenient origin of coordinates 
for the analysis of the motion. 

The first thing to notice is that the path of the moving par- 
ticle will lie in a fixed plane that passes through the center of 
force. This plane is defined by the initial velocity vector v of the 
particle and the initial vector position r of the particle with re- 
spect to the center of force. Since the force acting on the particle 
is in this plane, and sincc thcrc is no component of initial velocity 
perpendicular to it, the motion must remain confined to this 
plane of r and v . To analyze the motion we must first pick an 
appropriate coordinate system. Because the force F is a function 
of the scalar